Madhu Ps et al Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.
com
ISSN : 2248-9622, Vol. 4, Issue 5( Version 3), May 2014, pp.06-10
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS
Static Analysis, Design Modification and Modal Analysis of
Structural Chassis Frame
Madhu Ps1 and Venugopal T R 2
1
M Tech student Mechanical Department, NMAM Institute of Technology, Nitte-574110. India
2
Assistant Professor Mechanical Engineering, NMAM Institute of Technology, Nitte-574110. India
ABSTRACT
The chassis frame is an important part in a truck and it carries the whole load acting on the truck as well as
different parts of the automobile. So it must be strong enough to resist the shock, twist, vibration and other
stresses. Maximum stress and maximum deflection are important criteria for design of the chassis. The objective
of present is to determine the maximum stress, maximum deflection and to recognize critical regions under
static loading condition. Static structural analysis of the chassis frame is carried out by FEA Method. The
structural chassis frame is modeled using PRO-E wildfire 4.0 software. The Pre-processing has done with
HYPERMESH software; then the problem has been solved through RADIOSS and the post processing was done
by HYPERVIEW. The results obtained like maximum shear stress, Von-mises stress and maximum deflections
are used for improving design modification. Modal analysis of the chassis frame done using ANSYS
WORKBENCH. Through modal analysis, natural frequencies and corresponding vibration mode shapes of the
structure are obtained.
Keywords - Static Analysis; Finite Element Model; ladder chassis frame; allowable stress; resonance
I. INTRODUCTION Ladder chassis frame has been modeled according to
The chassis frame plays a vital role in the the dimension using PRO-E Wildfire.4 Cad software.
truck. All most all components weight is acting on
the chassis frame, thus chassis subjected to static,
dynamic and cyclic loading condition on the road,
therefore chassis must be rigid enough to resist this
loads. Static stress analysis is an important to point
out critical (highest stress) regions in the frame.
These critical regions may cause fatigue failures [1].
In this study, ladder type chassis frame is
analysed. The Chassis consists of side members Fig.1 Chassis frame CAD model
attached with a series of cross members to complete
the ladder like structure, thus its name [5]. They were 2.1 Meshing of geometry:
designed for functionality and provided little HYPERMESH software (made for meshing)
torsional stiffness. The FEM is a common tool for from Altair is used mesh the solid model. Cad model
stress analysis. FEM with required boundary which is in IGES format is imported to
conditions was used to determine critical regions in HYPERMESH. To mesh the geometry use the
the chassis frame. surface first and then solid. While meshing some of
Static structural analysis is performed to the quality parameters as to be maintained, those are
identify critical regions and based on the results aspect ratio, skew, jacobian, minimum element size,
obtained design modification has been done. warpage.
The modal analysis of the chassis frame is Element type used: Hexahedron; Number of
carried out to determine the natural frequency and elements generated: 126266; Number of nodes
mode shapes of the system. The rigidity of the system generated: 260857.
was analysed and their resonance could be avoided.
II. FE ANALYSIS OF CHASSIS
FRAME
A vehicle chassis is designed to carry the
payload, weights of other structural components
mounted on it [4]. For carrying out the FE analysis of
www.ijera.com 6|P age
Madhu Ps et al Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN : 2248-9622, Vol. 4, Issue 5( Version 3), May 2014, pp.06-10
Fig. 4 Forces and constraints in the frame
The total load (123851.25 N) is applied over
Fig.2 Flow chart of FEA process the top of the chassis frame, which contains 14576
nodes. So load on each node is given by
Force on each node present at top surface of side
rail= (total load)/ (number of nodes)
Force on each node = 123851.25/14576
Force per node=8.49N
III. FEA RESULTS
After applying boundary condition, the file
is imported to the solver. RADIOSS is used as solver
here for the analysis. Finally the post-process is done
by using HYPERVIEW software.
Fig.3 Meshed chassis frame The location of maximum Von Mises stress
and maximum shear stress are just near the supports
2.2 Material property: and at the joining portion of connecting plates and
TABLLE 1 side rail. The maximum Von mises stress is about
MATERIAL PROPERTY 181.69 MPa and the maximum deflection is about
Material used Carbon steel, AISI 1080 5.65 mm.
(tempered @ 205 C, oil
quenched)
Young’s 215 GPa
modulus (E)
Yield strength 800 MPa
Poisons ratio 0.285
Density 7800kg/m^3
Composition C=0.74-0.88% Fe=98.13- Fig.5 Maximum von-mises stress
98.66% Mn=0.6-0.9% P=
0.0-0.04% S=0.0-0.05%
2.3 Boundary conditions:
Static analysis is used to determine the
displacements, stresses, strains, and forces in
structures or components caused by steady loads that
do not induce significant inertia and damping effects
[2]. Boundary condition involves application of load
and defining constraints in the model. In our study Fig.6 Maximum displacement
Model is fixed in all degrees of freedom near the
supports; Rigids are applied at side rail, connecting IV. DESIGN MODIFICATION
plates, cross bars. Rigids applied at the side rail The Design modification (Re-design) is the
which is shown in figure 4. process of achieving some desired set of specification
which minimises the critical factors of model. While
modifying the model, the designer must have the
knowledge about model, behaviour of the model
under given loading condition, and also some
www.ijera.com 7|P age
Madhu Ps et al Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN : 2248-9622, Vol. 4, Issue 5( Version 3), May 2014, pp.06-10
experience in similar projects and also previous 4.2 Iteration 2:
results of existing model. In the second iteration we are going to add a
cross member for the 1st iteration model.
Fig.10 iteration 2 displacements
Fig.7 Flow chart for design modification process
In this study, the allowable stress is less than
the yield strength, so stresses are not a critical issue,
but deflection of chassis frame is about 5.64 mm.
Deflection of chassis frame has different standard
values for different vehicle frames and also has Fig.11 iteration 2 von-mises stress
different values for different type of analysis. Still it
is possible to minimize the deflection of chassis 4.3 Iteration 3:
frame without increase the stresses. In the 3rd iteration we are going to add 6th
cross member to the existing model.
4.1 Iteration 1:
As mentioned earlier, to minimize deflection
we have to study geometry and assembly of the
model. Ensure while redesign stresses must within
the yield strength or nearer to existing model.
By looking at the geometry of the chassis
frame shown in fig.1 can be modified by shifting 3rd
cross member away from 2nd, so we are moving the
3rd cross member about 65 mm(away from 2nd cross
member). So repeat the previous analysis process to Fig.12 iteration 3rd displacements
achieve results.
Fig.8 iteration 1 displacements
Fig.13 iteration 3rd von-mises stress
TABLE II
DESIGN MODIFICATION RESULTS
Iteration Von-mises stress in Displacement
MPA in mm
1 190.9 5.921
2 190.596 3.720
3 190.112 3.706
Fig.9 iteration 1 von-mises stress
www.ijera.com 8|P age
Madhu Ps et al Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN : 2248-9622, Vol. 4, Issue 5( Version 3), May 2014, pp.06-10
V. MODAL ANALYSIS
The modal analysis is the most basic and
important part of analysis of dynamic character [3].
This modern method used find the natural frequency
and mode shapes of the structures. The rigidity could
be analyzed and the resonance vibration could be
avoided. The main characteristics of each mode of
the structure can be figured out through the modal
analysis, and the actual vibration response under this
frequency range can be predicted. The results from
modal analysis can be used as reference value for
other dynamic analysis like random analysis,
harmonic analysis, etc.
In the paper, 3-D FE analysis is carried out Fig.14 mode shape1
on the modal analysis of chassis frame. And the FME
software ANSYS WORKBENCH was used to
simulate the modal analysis. The results of natural
frequencies and mode shape were obtained.
The first 14th-order natural frequencies of a
structural frame are extracted. The first, second third
and fourth modes are shown in below figures.
TABLE III
NATURAL FREQUENCIES
Mode Frequency(Hz)
01 3.7377
02 9.5166
03 29.896
04 36.22 Fig.15 mode shape 2
05 40.948
06 42.923
07 58.683
08 60.392
09 62.354
10 72.43
11 73.982
12 78.002
13 87.675
14 95.788
Each natural frequency of respective mode
shapes is listed in the table no 3. If any one of the
natural frequency matches with excitation frequency Fig.16 mode shape 3
the frame doesn’t satisfies the dynamic
characteristics. Out of 14 mode shapes the seventh
mode shape with natural frequency 58.683Hz is
critical and it will produce maximum stresses under
dynamic condition.
Fig.17 mode shape 4
www.ijera.com 9|P age
Madhu Ps et al Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications www.ijera.com
ISSN : 2248-9622, Vol. 4, Issue 5( Version 3), May 2014, pp.06-10
VI. CONCLUSION
In this paper static analysis, modification of
chassis frame based on results and modal analysis of
structure is achieved. First modelling of structure
done by PRO-E wildfire-4 and static analysis is
carried out using following software HYPERMESH,
RADIOSS, HYPERVIEW. Results indicate von-
mises stress below yield strength of the material,
which satisfies the design and deflection is about
5.648mm. Modification of design is carried out to
reduce deflection of structure. Deflection of the
modified structure is 3.706mm. Therefore chassis
frame deflection has been reduced from5.921mm to
3.706mm by modification. Finally the natural
frequency and corresponding vibration modes of
modified structure are found by modal analysis. Out
of all modes shapes seventh mode shape with natural
frequency 58.683 Hz is critical.
VII. Acknowledgements
The research work was supported by Merritt
Innovative Solution India Pvt Ltd Bangalore (Title:
“Static Analysis, Design Modification and Modal
Analysis of Structural Chassis Frame”) is gratefully
acknowledged.
References
Journal Papers:
[1] Hemant B.Patil, Sharad D.Kachave, Eknath
R.Deore “Stress Analysis of Automotive
Chassis with Various Thicknesses”, IOSR
Journal of Mechanical and Civil
Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) Vol. 6 Issue 1,
2013,pp 44-49.
[2] Tulasiram Nasikai. Charyulu T.N,"Design
and Analysis of Vehicle Chassis
Frame", Indian Streams Research Journal,
West Godavari Aug 2012, Volume 2, Issue.
7,
[3] Shan Xue, Guohua Cao, Qiongying Lv,
Hongji Xu" Modal Analysis and
Optimization of Novel External Rotor Radar
Stabilized Platform", International
Conference on Electronic & Mechanical
Engineering and Information Technology,
2011, pp 2729- 2733
[4]J. M.Biradar, B.V.Vijay, Kailash
Jat,.“Automotive Chassis Sizing
Optimisation for Modal and Distortion
Criteria” SASTech - Technical Journal,
2008, Volume 7, Issue 2,
[5] Patel Vijaykumar V, Prof. R. I. Patel,
“Structural Analysis of Automotive Chassis
Frame and Design Modification for Weight
Reduction” International Journal of
Engineering Research & Technology
(IJERT) 2012, Vol. 1 Issue 3
www.ijera.com 10 | P a g e
