CNR Module-2 Notes Continuation
CNR Module-2 Notes Continuation
Continuation…
The International Hydrological Program (IHP) has introduced five criteria for justifying or
rejecting IBWT projects.
These criteria are:
        1. The area of delivery must face a substantial deficit.
        2. The future development of the area of origin must not be substantially constrained by
           water scarcity.
        3. A comprehensive environmental impact assessment must indicate that the project will
           not substantially degrade environmental quality within the area of origin or area of
           delivery.
        4. A comprehensive assessment of socio-cultural impacts must indicate a reasonable
           degree of certainty that it will not cause substantial socio-cultural disruption in the area
           of origin or area of water delivery.
        5. The net benefits from the transfer must be shared equitably between the area of origin
           and the area of water delivery.
Therefore, any IBWT project should be evaluated based on these five criteria.
Existing Inter Basin Water Transfer Projects in India and Other Countries:
Examples of Inter basin water transfer in India
        1. Periyar – Vaigai project (Kerala state 1985)
        2. Kurnool – Cuddapah Canal (Andhra Pradesh 1863-1870)
        3. Parambikulam – Aliyar project (1962-82)
        4. Telugu – Ganga project
        5. Beas – Sutlej Link (1983)
        6. Indira Gandhi Nahar project (Rajasthan canal, 1958)
        7. Sarada – ahayak Project (1960)
        8. Ramganga – Ganga Link (1978)
        9. Tungabhadra – Pennar project
        10. Mahi project
        11. Tehri Multipurpose project
In other countries
Many large-scale water transfer schemes have been planned and implemented in other countries
also.
   Hence for a uniform distribution of the existing waters, interlinked basins have been
    deployed in some parts of India connecting the peninsular and Himalayan rivers. Similarly,
    in China, a multi infrastructure project, under the name of South.
   The initial plan to interlink India’s rivers came in 1858 from a British irrigation engineer,
    Sir Arthur Thomas Cotton.
   This idea was revisited in 1960 by the then Minister of State for Energy and Irrigation, KL
    Rao, who proposed to link rivers Ganga and Cauvery.
   In 1977 Captain Dastur proposed Garland of canal around the Himalayan, Central and
    Peninsular India.
   The interlinking of river (ILR) was introduced in 1982; it was actively taken up during Atal
    Bihari Vajpayee’s tenure as Prime Minister during 1999–2004.
   In 2002, the Supreme Court asked the government to finalize a plan for interlinking rivers
    by 2003 and execute it by 2016.
   In response to this order, the Government of India appointed a Task Force and scientists,
    engineers, ecologists, biologists and policy makers started to deliberate over the technical,
    economic and eco-friendly feasibility of this gigantic project.
   Since 2015, Indian Government has implemented river interlinking projects in several
    segments such as the Godavari-Krishna river interlining in Andhra Pradesh and the Ken-
    Betwa rivers interlink in Madhya Pradesh.
   These projects are built with aims that it will enhance annual per capita water availability for
    increasing population of the country.
   The Godavari-Krishna rivers interlinking projects also envisions an area more than twice the
    size of Andhra Pradesh receiving extra water for irrigation and to even out the unwarranted
    swings between droughts and floods.
   Later, Ministry of Water Resources and Central Water Commission formulated a National
    Perspective Plan (NPP) in 1980 to study water resources development in the country and
    transfer of water from surplus basin to deficit one to minimize regional imbalance.
   NWDA (National Water Development Agency) was formed under NPP to further
    investigate and explore the possibilities of interlinking of rivers.
   As per NWDA, Inter basin water transfer is proposed in two components namely Himalayan
    component and Peninsular component. Both the components together have 30 river-linking
    projects.
Major advantages of ILR:
  1. Create the potential to increase agricultural production by an additional 100 per cent over
      the next five years.
  2. Avoid the losses of the type that occurred in 2002 to the extent of $550 million by the loss
      of crops because of extreme draught or flood condition.
  3. Save $ 565215000 a year in foreign exchange by avoiding importing oil.
  4. Unify the country by involving every Panchayat as a share holder and implement agency.
  5. Provide for enhancing the security of the country by an additional waterline of defense.
  6. Provide employment to the 10 lakh people for the next 10 years.
  7. Eradicate the flooding problems which occur again in the north-east and the north every
      year.
  8. Solve the water crisis situation by providing alternative, perennial water resources.
  9. The large canals linking the rivers are also expected to facilitate inland navigation too.
  10. Increasing food production from about 200m tones a year to 500m.
  11. Boost the annual average income of farmers, from the present $40 per acre of land to over
      $500.
Major disadvantages of ILR:
  1. Environmental costs (deforestation, soil erosion, etc.)
  2. Rehabilitation: not an easy task
  3. Social unrest/Psychological damage due to forced resettlement of local people (for
      example, Sardar Sarovar Project)
  4. Political effects: strained relationship with neighbors (Pakistan, Bangladesh)
Benefits of River Interlinking:
There are many benefits that the proposed interlinking projects will bring about. They are
discussed below:
   1. Interlinking rivers is a way to transfer excess water from the regions which receive a lot
       of rainfall to the areas that are drought-prone. This way, it can control both floods and
       droughts.
   2. This will also help solve the water crisis in many parts of the country.
   3. The project will also help in hydropower generation. This project envisages the building
       of many dams and reservoirs. This can generate about 34000 MW of electricity if the
       whole project is executed.
   4. The project will help in dry weather flow augmentation. That is when there is a dry
       season, surplus water stored in the reservoirs can be released. This will enable a
       minimum amount of water flow in the rivers. This will greatly help in the control of
       pollution, in navigation, forests, fisheries, wildlife protection, etc.
   5. Indian agriculture is primarily monsoon-dependent. This leads to problems in agricultural
       output when the monsoons behave unexpectedly. This can be solved when irrigation
       facilities improve. The project will provide irrigation facilities in water-deficient places.
   6. The project will also help commercially because of the betterment of the inland
       waterways transport system. Moreover, the rural areas will have an alternate source of
       income in the form of fish farming, etc.
   7. The project will also increase the defence and security of the country through the
       additional waterline defence.
through Subernarekha and Mahanadi is also envisaged. For this link high dams are proposed at
Manas and Sankosh with storage capacities of 8.75 BCM and 4.93 BCM, respectively (Singh
2002). A substantial part of the cost of these dams will be allocated to hydropower generation.
The 114 km long link canal between Manas and Sankosh will have a discharge capacity of 3,725
m3/s. Beyond Sankosh and up to the Teesta barrage, the link canal is 137 km long with a capacity
of 1,092 m3/s. Clearly, this will be a huge canal which will cross major drainages. The MSTG
link passes through the narrow chicken neck in West Bengal (north of Bangladesh) and may
have security aspects.
2. Ghaghra-Yamuna Link
The Ghagra-Yamuna link project is an inter-dependent link under the Himalayan Component of
NPP. A study reveals that the Ghagra River (known as Karnali in Nepal) at the proposed the
Chisapani dam site has surplus water. It is proposed that the existing requirement of water for the
Sarda Sahayak Pariyojna, Saryu Nahar Pariyojna and various pump canals would be met from
the proposed Gandak - Ganga link project and the water saved thereby could be diverted from
the proposed Chisapani reservoir through the Ghagra - Yamuna link canal. The height of
proposed dam is 175 m. A regulating dam downstream of the Chisapani dam is proposed with a
full reservoir level of 200 m and a minimum drawdown level 193 m. The link canal shall join
Yamuna River in Etawah district of Uttar Pradesh. The total length of the link canal would be
about 417 km with its depth varying from 8 m in the head reach to 5 m in the tail reach and the
width varying from 85.5 m in the head reach to 18 m towards the tail end.
3. Sarda-Yamuna-Rajasthan-Sabarmati Link Canal
This is a continuous link having a combination of three links, viz., the Sarda-Yamuna link, the
Yamuna-Rajasthan link, and the Rajasthan-Sabarmati link. This link canal is planned to divert
17,906 MCM (14.52 MAF) water of Himalayan rivers. Its length will be 1,835 km out of which
75 km will be in Gujarat State. A total of 4 states, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, Rajasthan and
Gujarat, are to be benefited by this link. About 1,627 MCM (1.32 MAF) water has been allocated
to North Gujarat which is only 9% of the total divertible water at the canal head. A total 7.38
lakh ha area is to be irrigated by the Rajasthan-Sabarmati link, out of which 5.35 lakh ha in
Rajasthan and 2.03 lakh ha in Gujarat.
4. Yamuna-Rajasthan Link Canal Project
The Yamuna-Rajasthan link proposal is an extension of the proposed Sarda–Yamuna Link
beyond the Yamuna to provide irrigation to the drought prone areas of Haryana and Rajasthan. It
envisages diversion of 8,657 Mm3 of water from the Sarda basin at Purnagiri. The Yamuna -
Rajasthan link is to take off from the right bank of proposed Yamuna barrage and passes through
the Karnal, Sonipat, Jind, Hisar and Bhiwani districts of Haryana and Churu, Hanumangarh,
Ganganagar, Bikaner, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer districts of Rajasthan and ends on the Jaisalmer-
Hamira-Shri Mohangarh Road at a distance of 4.5 km from village Kanod towards Jaisalmer.
The length of the link canal is 786 km, out of which 196 km lies in Haryana and the rest 590 km
in Rajasthan. The design discharge at head and tail are 572 cumec and 344 cumec, respectively.
The longitudinal slope of the canal is 1:20,000. The full supply depth and bed width of the canal
at head are 7 m and 53 m, respectively. The Yamuna - Rajasthan link will provide an annual
irrigation of 244,200 ha in the districts of Ganganagar, Bikaner, Jodhpur and Jaisalmer of
Rajasthan.
RBC command, 2,265 Mm3 for the Krishna delta as committed under the Godavari Water
Dispute Tribunal award and 1,190 Mm3 for existing ayacut in the Krishna Delta. The proposed
Polavaram Barrage will be used to divert the Godavari water to the existing Prakasam Barrage of
the Krishna River at Vijayawada. The total length of the link canal will be 174 km and head
discharge will be 361 cumec. The canal will operate round the year. The FSL at the head and tail
are 40.23 m and 27.96 m, respectively.
4. Krishna (Srisailam)-Pennar Link
The link has been proposed to divert 2,310 Mm3 of water from the Srisailam reservoir to
Adinimmayapalli Anicut. The water would mostly flow through natural rivers and it is expected
that about 2,095 M m3 would reach the Somasila reservoir. This water is in exchange for surplus
waters of the Mahanadi transferred from the Godavari to the Nagarjunasagar. The total length of
the channel would be 171.30 km and design discharge will be 186 cumec. This channel would
run for 180 days in a year.
5. Pennar (Somasila) - Cauvery (Grand Anicut) Link
The aim of this link is to transfer 8,565 Mm3 of water from the Pennar to the Cauvery. Of this
quantity, 3,170 Mm3 would be used for en-route irrigation, 279 Mm3 for en-route domestic and
industrial uses, 876 Mm3 for the Chennai city water supply and 3,855 Mm3 would be transferred
to the Cauvery River at Grand Anicut. About 385 Mm3 water is likely to be lost during
transmission. The total length of the canal will be 538 km and its design discharge will be 616.38
cumec. The canal will be operated for 365 days in a year.
6. Cauvery (Kattalai Regulator) - Vaigai - Gundar Link
The link has been proposed to transfer 2,252 Mm3 of water from the Cauvery River to the Vaigai
River to provide irrigation to 353,337 ha annually. The FSLs of the 250 km long link canal at the
head and the tail will be 100.75 m and 78.865 m, respectively. This will be a lined canal which
would be operated round the year.
7. Krishna (Almatti) - Pennar Link
The canal linking Krishna (Almatti) with Pennar (587 km long) will take off from right bank of
the Almatti dam across the Krishna River in Karnataka with FSL of 510.00 m. The canal will run
through Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh before joining Maddileru, a tributary of the Pennar near
the Malakavemula village.
increased methane emission from reservoirs are few of the other environmental damages.
3. Impact on society: Building dams and reservoirs will cause the displacement of a lot of
people. This will cause a lot of agony for a lot of people. They will have to be rehabilitated and
adequately compensated.
4. Controlling floods: Some people express doubts, as to the capability of this project to control
floods. Although theoretically, it is possible, India’s experience has been different. There have
been instances where big dams like Hirakud Dam, Damodar Dam, etc. have brought flooding to
Odisha, West Bengal, etc.
5. Inter-state disputes: Many states like Kerala, Sikkim, Andhra Pradesh, etc. have opposed the
river interlinking project.
6. International disputes: In the Himalayan component of the project, the effect of building
dams and interlinking rivers will have an effect on the neighboring countries like Bhutan, Nepal
and Bangladesh. This will have to be factored in while implementing the project. Bangladesh has
opposed the transfer of water from the Brahmaputra to the Ganga.
Ground Water:
     Ground Water it is usually defined as water found underground in the saturated zone
      of rocks, i.e. at depths where the entire void space of the rock is filled with water.
                                                  OR
     Groundwater is the water present in spaces in soil or sands under the earth, or
      between cracks of rocks lying deep inside.
     It is a term used to denote subsurface water that exists at pressure greater than or equal to
      atmospheric pressure.
     As groundwater supplies are limited, they must be properly managed and protected against
      undue exploitation and contamination by pollutants.
     Groundwater is found in two zones. The unsaturated zone, immediately below the land
      surface, contains water and air in the open spaces, or pores. The saturated zone, a zone in
      which all the pores and rock fractures are filled with water, underlies the unsaturated zone.
      The top of the saturated zone is called the water table (Fig-1). The water table may be just
      below or hundreds of feet below the land surface.
     the Pleistocene times, shows a large scale development of fresh water sediments.
 3. Indo-Gangetic alluvium: Coarse sands, gravel and boulders of variable thickness-3 to 60 m.
     Water commonly hard; shallow and deep aquifers interconnected. The exploitation of
     ground water is usually done by using spiral augers hand boring (H.B.) sets, cable tool and
     rotary rigs.
 4. Coastal alluvium-Malabar and Coromandel coastal areas: Depth 15-150 m, yield =12-50
     m3/h; low TDS; water in tertiary aquifer associated with lignite or carbonaceous clay is
     sulphuretted and contains iron > 1 ppm. Extensive saline patches occur in Ramna
     Tirunelveli, Ongole, Nellore and Krishna districts.
 5. Cretaceous sandstones of Kathiawar and Kutch areas: Moderately potential aquifers depth
     100-300 m, water commonly brackish with TDS 2000-5000 ppm.
 6. Mesozoic sandstones of the Lathi region in Rajasthan (Jaisalmer, Barmer, Bikaner):
     Moderately potential aquifers, depths 100-150 m, yield =45-150 m3/hr water is generally
     brackish to saline.
 7. Cavernous limestones of Vindhyan system in Borunda and Ransingaon areas in Jodhpur
     district: Potential aquifers Potable water and fractured up to 150 m.
     Recharge of some arid zones in Haryana and Rajasthan can be done by diverting the flood
     waters of Yamuna river through Saraswathi and Ghaggar rivers by making suitable
     connections.
 8. Doon valley gravels: Boulders, pebbles, gravel, sand and clay possibly of fanglomeratic
     and collovial origin. Major portion of the valley is hilly, sloping ground.
 9. Quaternary alluvium of Narmada, Purna, Tapti, Chambal and Mahanadi rivers: Thickness
     75-150 m (lenses of sand and gravel); tubewell wield 20-150 m³/hr; good quality water
     with TDS 100-500 ppm.
 10. Vesicular basalts in the Deccan trap formations of Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh: Form
     good aquifers; ground water occurs under both confined and unconfined conditions in the
     Satpura range and Malwa plateau; tubewell yields in Indore, Bhopal, Raisen, Vidisha and
     Sagar districts.
 11. Carbonate rocks with solution cavities in Madhya Pradesh: In the Vindhyan, Cuddapah and
     Bijawar region, the carbonate rocks with interconnected solution cavities and caverns form
     good aquifers.
 12. Dharwarian and Bundelkhand granite region of Madhya Pradesh: Igneous and
     metamorphic rocks; the movement of water is mainly through joints and openings. The
     water quality in all regions of MP is generally good, except in the water logged areas of the
     Chambal valley.
 13. Tertiary snadstones and quaternary sand to pebble beds in the Godavari-Krishna
     interstream area: Form potential aquifers with artesian conditions.
 14. Alluvium in Palar and Kortallaiyar-Araniyar rivers in Tamil Nadu: Form potential aquifers:
     water of good quality. Tertiary sediments of Cauvery delta: The tertiary sediments in
     Tanjore and Arcot districts form extensive aquifers up to 200 m depth. Water is of good
     quality;
 15. Granitic gneisses and schists of Karnataka: The principle rock types of Karnataka are
     igneous and metamorphic granites, geneisses and schists of Precambrian age and basalt of
     the Deccan trap of Eocene-Upper Cretaceous age in the extreme northern part of the state.
 16. Upper Gondwana sandstones and the alluvial tract of Orissa: Form potential aquifers.
 17. The Quaternary sediments in the deltaic tract around Digha, district Midnapur, West
     Bengal: These are of depth 140 m and yield fresh water.
 18. The multilayered Lacustrine aquifer in Nepal in the centre of the Kathmandu valley basin:
     It has a depth of sediment of > 450m deposits becoming coarser towards the north where
     most of the catchment is mountainous. The sediment consists of silt, coarse sand and
     cobbles with electrical resistivity ranging from 40-120 ohm-m.
 19. Karstic limestones in the north coastal belt of Sri Lanka: Nine-tenths of the area of the
     island are underlain by the crystalline rocks such as gneisses, schists, quartzites and
     crystalline limestones of the Precambrian basement complex; low yields are obtained from
     the locally developed fissures and fractures. The soil overburden is 2-15 m and large
     diameter dug wells are generally suitable.
 20. Thermal and mineral springs: They are found in many parts of India-Bombay, Punjab,
     Bihar, Assam, in the foothills of Himalayas and Kashmir.
Conjunctive Use:
   3. Efficient water use from well spaced wells due to smaller surface distribution system than
       a canal irrigation scheme.
   4. Water table can be controlled by pumping from wells and prevent water logging in canal
       irrigated areas and reduce land subsidence due to reduced ground water levels
       particularly in confined aquifers.
   5. Both water conservation and flood protection can be achieved simultaneously.
   6. A sub-surface scheme can be developed in a shorter period while it takes 10-15 years for
       the completion of a big surface water project.
   7. No evaporation and percolation losses, thus obviating the construction of expensive storm
       and seepage drains.
   8. In project under conjunctive use of waters, tube well loads can be reduced by releasing
       surface water for irrigation during periods of peak power demand thus resulting in lower
       power costs.
   9. Crop water requirements can be ensured right through the year using surface water during
       the monsoons and ground water supplies when the surface water is not available.
   10. Ground water and surface water can be mixed in proper proportions to obtain a desired
       water quality for irrigating certain crop types when the ground water has a higher salt
       concentration only certain salt tolerant crops can be grown.
   11. Integration of the two types of schemes can be obtained with the existing water resources
       without loss of earlier investment.
  Groundwater Recharge is a (hydrologic) process where the water from the surface of the
     earth seeps downwards and gets collected in aquifers. So, the process is also known as
     deep drainage or deep percolation.
  Recharge occurs both naturally (through the water cycle) and through anthropogenic
     processes (i.e. artificial groundwater recharge), where rainwater and or reclaimed water is
     routed to the subsurface.
The different methods of groundwater recharge are:
1. Spreading Basins
2. Recharge Pits and Shafts
3. Ditches
4. Recharge Wells
5. Harvesting in Cistern from Hill Sides
6. Subsurface Dams
7. Farm Ponds
8. Historical Large Well across Streamlet
9. Check Dams.
1. Spreading Basins: This method involves surface flooding of water in basins that are
excavated in the existing terrain. For effective recharge highly permeable soils are suitable and
maintenance of a layer of water over the highly permeable soil is necessary.
When direct discharge is practiced the amount of water entering the aquifer depends on three
factors the infiltration rate, the percolation rate, and the capacity for horizontal water movement.
At the surface of aquifer, however, clogging occurs by deposition of particles carried by water in
suspension or in solution, by algae growth, colloidal swelling and soil dispersion, microbial
activity, etc. Recharge by spreading basins is most effective where there are layer below the land
surface and the aquifer and where clear water is available for recharge.
2. Recharge Pits and Shafts: The artificial recharge systems such as pits and shafts could be
effective in order to access the dewatered aquifer. The rate of recharge has been being found to
increase as the side slope of the pits increased.
Unfiltered runoff water leaves a thin film of sediments on the sides and bottom of the pits, which
3. Ditches: A ditch is described as a long narrow trench, with its bottom width less than its
depth. A ditch system is designed to suit topographic and geological condition that exists at the
given site.
A layout for a ditch and flooding recharge project could include a series of trenches running
down the topographic slope.
The ditches could terminate in a collection ditch designed to carry away the water that does not
infiltrate in order to avoid ponding and to reduce the accumulation of fine materials.
4. Recharge Wells: Recharge or injection wells are used to directly recharge the deep-water
bearing strata. Recharge wells could be dug through the material overlaying the aquifer and if the
earth materials are unconsolidated, a screen can be placed in the well in zone of injection.
Recharge wells are suitable only in areas where thick impervious layer exists between the surface
of the soil and the aquifer to be replenished. They are also advantageous in areas where land is
scarce. A relatively high rate of recharge can be attained by this method. Clogging of the well
screen or aquifer may lead to excessive buildup of water level in the recharge well.
5. Harvesting in Cistern from Hill Sides: In this method construction of small drains along
contours of hilly area are done so that the runoff in these drains are collected in a cistern, which
is located at the bottom of a hill or a mountain. This water is used for irrigation or for drinking
purpose and the water is of good quality.
6. Subsurface Dams: Ground water moves from higher-pressure head to lower one. This will
help in semi-arid zone regions especially in upper reaches where the ground water velocity is
high. By exploiting more ground water in upper reaches more surface water can be utilized
indirectly, thereby reducing inflow into lower reaches of supply. Ground water is stored either in
natural aquifer materials in sub-surface dams or in artificial sand storage dam.
7. Farm Ponds: These are traditional structures in rain water harvesting. Farm ponds are small
storage structures collecting and storing runoff waste for drinking as well as irrigation purposes.
As per the method of construction and their suitability for different topographic conditions farm
ponds are classified into three categories such as excavated farm ponds suited for flat
topography, embankment ponds suited for hilly and ragged terrains and excavated cum
embankment type ponds.
Selection of location of farm ponds depend on several factors such as rainfall, land topography,
soil type, texture, permeability, water holding capacity, land-use pattern, etc.
8. Historical Large Well across Streamlet: If any historical wells are located near the
streamlet, then allow the water into the well from streamlet by connecting drains. In this case the
historical wells act as a recharge well so that ground water can be improved.
9. Check Dams: Check dams are small barriers built across the direction of water flow on
shallow river and streams for the purpose of rain water harvesting. The small dams retain excess
water flow during monsoon rains in a small catchment area behind the structure.
Pressures created in the catchments area send the impounded water into the ground. The major
environmental benefit is the replenishment of nearby ground water reserves and wells. The most
common case of check dams is to decrease the slope and velocity of a stream to control erosion.
Other naturally occurring substances, such as decaying organic matter, can move in ground water
as particles. Whether any of these substances appears in ground water depends on local
conditions. Some substances may pose a health threat if consumed in excessive quantities; others
may produce an undesirable odor, taste, or color. Ground water that contains unacceptable
concentrations of these substances is not used for drinking water or other domestic water uses
unless it is treated to remove these contaminants.
2. Storage Tanks: May contain gasoline, oil, chemicals, or other types of liquids and they can
either be above or below ground. There are estimated to be over 10 million storage tanks buried
in the United States and over time the tanks can corrode, crack and develop leaks. If the
contaminants leak out and get into the groundwater, serious contamination can occur.
3. Septic Systems: Onsite wastewater disposal systems used by homes, offices or other buildings
that are not connected to a city sewer system. Septic systems are designed to slowly drain away
human waste underground at a slow, harmless rate. An improperly designed, located,
constructed, or maintained septic system can leak bacteria, viruses, household chemicals, and
other contaminants into the groundwater causing serious problems.
4. Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste: In the U.S. today, there are thought to be over 20,000
known abandoned and uncontrolled hazardous waste sites and the numbers grow every year.
Hazardous waste sites can lead to groundwater contamination if there are barrels or other
containers laying around that are full of hazardous materials. If there is a leak, these
contaminants can eventually make their way down through the soil and into the groundwater.
5. Landfills: Landfills are the places that our garbage is taken to be buried. Landfills are
supposed to have a protective bottom layer to prevent contaminants from getting into the water.
However, if there is no layer or it is cracked, contaminants from the landfill (car battery acid,
paint, household cleaners, etc.) can make their way down into the groundwater.
6. Chemicals and Road Salts: The widespread use of chemicals and road salts is another source
of potential groundwater contamination. Chemicals include products used on lawns and farm
fields to kill weeds and insects and to fertilize plants, and other products used in homes and
businesses. When it rains, these chemicals can seep into the ground and eventually into the
water. Road salts are used in the winter time to put melt ice on roads to keep cars from sliding
around. When the ice melts, the salt gets washed off the roads and eventually ends up in the
water.
    in waters and prevent the distribution of oxygen and nutrients and thus harm aquatic life.
   Seawater intrusion which can lead to groundwater quality degradation, including drinking
    water sources, and other consequences.
2. Creating a fresh water ridge near the sea: The method would require the continuous
maintenance of a fresh water ridge in the principal water bearing deposits along the coast
through the application of water by surface spreading or injection wells otherwise both. Effects
of a fresh water ridge or mound on seawater ingression are shown in Figure 5(a) and Figure 5(b)
for unconfined aquifer and confined aquifer, respectively. The actual formation of a ridge along
the coastal segment of a groundwater basin by use of injection wells otherwise surface water
spreading or combination of both would depend on whether free groundwater or pressure
condition exists, as determined by geologic and engineering investigations.
 Figure 5 (a) & (b): An injection ridge seawater barrier and an extraction type of seawater
            barrier in unconfined and confined groundwater basins, respectively.
 Figure 6 (a) & (b): Hydrologic conditions with an extraction type of seawater barrier and
  an injection ridge seawater barrier in an unconfined and confined groundwater basin.