Acta Bot 2023
Acta Bot 2023
2023
EDITORIAL BOARD
Editor-in-Chief
Anastasiu Paulina
Deputy/ Managing Editor
Camen-Comănescu Petronela
Editorial Advisory Board
Cristea Vasile, University „Babeş - Bolyai”, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Janauer Georg, University of Wien, Austria
Popescu Ioana, Drury University, Springfield, United States of America
Shevera Myroslav, M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Tănase Cătălin, University „Al. I. Cuza”, Iaşi, Romania
Uludag Ahmet, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, Turkey
Vladimirov Vladimir, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria
Editors
Plant morphology & anatomy: Sârbu Anca
Systematic botany & vegetation: Anastasiu Paulina
Plants, algae and fungi biodiversity: Şesan Tatiana Eugenia, Anastasiu Paulina
Plant physiology and biochemistry: Lazăr Daniela
Plant genetics and biotechnology: Simon-Gruiţă Alexandra, Stoica Ileana
Plant pathology: Şesan Tatiana Eugenia
Horticulture: Iliescu Ana-Felicia
Journal Secretary
Urziceanu Mihaela, University of Bucharest, Romania
Sîrbu Ioana Minodora, University of Bucharest, Romania
Technical Editors
Pogonariu Meri, University of Bucharest, Romania
Acta Horti Botanici Bucurestiensis (text and summaries in English) is published once a
year by the Botanic Garden “D. Brandza”, University of Bucharest (Şoseaua Cotroceni
32, 060114, Bucureşti, România) and it is available for exchange. The current volume is
also available online at: http://ahbb.unibuc.ro
Abstract: In recent years, there has been a growing interest in alien plant species because
of their substantial impact on biological diversity, ecosystems, and economy. These
species are often characterized by their capacity to rapidly colonize diverse habitats.
Symphyotrichum squamatum, an alien species for Romanian flora, displays invasive
tendencies in various European countries, showing adaptability to a wide range of
habitats, particularly those with high soil moisture. While previous research has focused
on aspects of its invasiveness, limited information is available regarding the anatomical
structure of its vegetative organs. Our study aims to identify the structural characteristics
that may explain the species’ environmental preferences and adaptability to various
habitat types. The results showed the presence of aeriferous tissues in the root and stem
suggesting an affinity for humid conditions, while the lamina’s structure enhances light
capturing efficiency and adaptability to salinity. These anatomical investigations provide
valuable insights into understanding species’ environmental requirements and resilience,
contributing to a better understanding of its adaptability to various habitats and potential
impact on local ecosystems.
Keywords: invasive species, anatomy, structural adaptations, environmental requirements
Introduction
In the last two decades, the interest in alien species has grown considerably,
driven by research findings that have highlighted their substantial impact on biological
diversity, ecosystem functioning, and the economy (Mack et al. 2000; Mooney &
Hobbs 2000; Pyšek & Richardson 2006; Hulme et al. 2008; Vilà et al. 2009). These
studies aimed to identify the major invasive species, analyze invasion patterns and
dynamics in large regions, assess the impact of invaders, and develop management
strategies for invaded ecosystems (Pyšek et al. 1995; Daehler & Carino 2000; Lloret et
al. 2004; Křivánek & Pyšek 2006; Richardson & Pyšek 2006).
The invasive plants are typically defined as naturalized species capable of
producing a large number of reproductive offspring over considerable distances from their
parent plants, enabling them to spread rapidly across extensive areas (Pyšek & Richardson
2006). Identifying the traits associated with invasiveness is a challenging task that requires
comprehensive comparative studies based on extensive data (Alpert et al. 2000; Pyšek &
Richardson 2006). Among these traits, one of the most important factor correlated with a
plant’s ability to colonize new habitats is its reproductive characteristics, particularly those
related to seed production (e.g size and number of seeds) and their dispersal (Moravcova
1
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Biology, Department of Botany and Microbiology, 1-3 Intr. Portocalelor,
Bucharest, Romania
*Correspondance: mioara.dumitrascu@bio.unibuc.ro
6 DUMITRAȘCU M., SÂRBU A., CÎȘLARIU A.G.
et al. 2010). Furthermore, the species’ ability to establish in diverse environments was
considered as an indicator of its invasive potential (Arianoutsou et al. 2010).
Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G.L. Nesom was first reported as an alien
species in the Romanian flora in 2016 (Camen-Comănescu et al. 2016). This species
belongs to the Asteraceae (Compositae) family and is native to South America (Nesom
1994, Greuter 2003, Nesom 2005, Hind 2011). Currently, Symphyotrichum squamatum
is widely naturalized in the Mediterranean region and is recognized as invasive in many
European countries, including Italy, France, Portugal, Slovenia, Greece, Malta (Pace &
Tammaro 2001; Bernez et al. 2006; Celesti-Grapow et al. 2009, Zelnik 2012, Stešević
& Caković 2013, EPPO 2016).
The species’ native distribution includes subtropical regions, often in proximity
to beaches, ballast dumps (Nesom 2005), and salt marshes (Šajna et al. 2014). Nesom
(2005) documented the species’s native habitats as typically moist to wet, rarely saline.
In the areas where it has been introduced, Symphyotrichum squamatum has been
observed in a variety of environments, including semi-natural habitats such as halophyte
communities, marshlands, and degraded streams, particularly near coastlines. However,
it has been predominantly reported from disturbed areas such as wet crops, waste
grounds, the bases of walls, roadsides, abandoned gardens, ruins, harbors, ditches, rice
fields, heaps, coastal grasslands, or arable land located farther from the sea (Fenwick
2001; Nesom 2005; Green 2007; Šajna et al. 2014; Invasive Plants in Portugal 2016).
Symphyotrichum squamatum is a ubiquitous, weedy species with a high salt
tolerance, capable of thriving in various habitats and soil types (loamy soil, peaty sand,
deep white sand, granite, laterite, basalt), as long as soil moisture is assured (Schembri
& Laufranco 1996; Invasive Plants in Portugal 2016; https://florabase.dbca.wa.gov.au/).
The analyzed species has a prolonged flowering period from June to October,
with fruiting extending until November. A single plant exceeding 110 cm in height, can
produce up to 70,000 seeds (Šajna et al. 2014), which, along with its substantial salt
tolerance and adaptability to nutrient-poor soils (low in nitrogen and phosphorus), most
likely contribute to its ability to colonize a wide range of habitats (Šajna et al. 2014,
Tripathi & Sharma 2019).
While many research and projects at the European level have focused on the
study of the alien species Symphyotrichum squamatum (Pace & Tammaro 2001; Bernez
et al. 2006; Celesti-Grapow et al. 2009; Zelnik 2012; Stešević & Caković 2013; EPPO
2016), including investigations on its reproductive potential (Šajna et al. 2014), there is
limited information regarding the structure of its vegetative organs. Therefore, this
paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the vegetative body structure of
Symphyotrichum squamatum in order to identify the histo-anatomical characteristics
that may explain its environmental preferences and adaptability to various habitat types.
numerous ray florets (21-28(-38)) with filiform, erect (non- coiling) corollas, which are
shorter (1.3-2 mm long) than the mature pappus (Nesom 2005).
The fruits are pubescent, 3-5-nerved achenes with a 1-seriate, accrescent pappus.
The pappus hairs can reach lengths of 4-5 mm, being longer than the ray corollas
(Camen-Comănescu et al. 2016).
Methodology. The biological material consisted of roots, stems and leaves from
Symphyotrichum squamatum plants collected in 2022 from Bucharest (Șos. Cotroceni,
nr. 32) and preserved in 70% alcohol during handling.
For the structural analysis, the vegetative organs were manually cross-sectioned
at different levels: the root was sectioned in the median third, the stem in the lower, and
superior third, and the lamina in the median third.
The cross sections were treated with two differential stains: Iodine Green and
Carmine Alum, following the double staining technique as described by Şerbănescu-
Jitariu et al. (1983). Additionally, for the analysis of stomata, paradermal sections were
prepared from the leaves.
To examine and document the histo-anatomical features of Symphyotrichum
squamatum’s vegetative organs, microscopic analysis and micro-photographs were
conducted using the DOCUVAL optical microscope.
Stem. The cross sections performed at the two levels of the stem (lower and
upper third) showed a secondary structure characterized by an annual growth ring in the
lower part and a fasciculate disposition in the upper part (Fig. 4).
The stem’s epidermis is unistratified, with isodiametric cells, and a cuticle that
differentiates cuticular ridges. A few stomata (anomocytic) were noticed between the
epidermal cells. The structure of the cortex exhibits variation at different stem levels. In
the lower part, the cortex is parenchymatous, lacking the palisade tissue, while in the
upper parts, assimilative parenchyma is present with a discontinuous disposition
(Fig. 5). Similar to the root, the aeriferous parenchyma with large channels is well
differentiated along the stem. The surface of the cortical aerenchyma decreases slightly
from the lower to the upper part of the stem.
The vascular cylinder lacks a pericycle. The vascular bundles are open collateral
and have a circular disposition, with phloem outward, covered by a cap of lignified
sclerenchymatous fibers (Fig. 4, 5). A total number of 17-18 vascular bundles of
different sizes, marked by medullary rays, were observed in the cross sections. The
surface of the secondary xylem decreases from the base of the stem to the top. The
center of the vascular cylinder is filled with a parenchymatous, meatic pith formed of
large, polygonal cells (Fig. 4).
the plant’s overall robustness and competivity with other plant species. The presence of
well-differentiated aeriferous tissues in the stem, similar to those observed in the root,
highlights the plant’s adaptability to various wet environmental conditions.
The lamina of Symphyotrichum squamatum is bifacial with an ecvifacial
structure. In cross section, the lamina features a semi-circular contour with a flat adaxial
face and a more rounded, proeminent abaxial face, particularly noticeable around the
midbrid (Fig. 6). Both faces are covered by a cuticle which differentiates cuticular
ridges (Fig. 7).
The epidermis consists of isodiametric cells, with thicker cell walls on the outer
surface. The lamina is amphystomatic, with stomata located at a higher level than the
epidermal cells. In paradermal sections, it has been observed that the epidermis features
an anomocytic type of stomata and an occasional paracytic type of stomata (Fig. 8).
The mesophyll comprises 2-3 layers of palisade cells located under both the
upper and lower epidermis. In the central area, a dense lacunose tissue containing two
layers of isodiametric cells with small gaps is present (Fig. 9).
The vascular tissues are organized into closed collateral vascular bundles with a
primary structure. The vascular bundle from the median level of the lamina is larger
than the others and is supported by a mechanical tissue consisting of an angular
collenchyma (Fig. 6).
12 DUMITRAȘCU M., SÂRBU A., CÎȘLARIU A.G.
Conclusions
The adaptive traits identified in Symphyotrichum squamatum highlight its
ecological resilience and versatility in thriving across diverse habitats. The robust
vegetative body highlights the taxon’s ability to withstand environmental variations and
underscores its potential for widespread colonization. The presence of aerenchyma from
root and stem, further supports the species’ ability to grow in humid habitats, as
documented for native plants in the literature. Although its current distribution in
Romania does not include wet habitats, the species has the structural potential to thrive
in such environments.
The current work contributes to a better understanding of the adaptive capacity
of this species to colonize various habitats, with significant implications for the
management of ecosystems affected by this alien plant species. The histo-anatomical
characteristics of Symphyotrichum squamatum’s vegetative organs can serve as a
valuable tool for assessing its adaptability and potential invasiveness. Nevertheless,
further research and monitoring are very important in determining the impact of this
potentially invasive species on local ecosystems.
References
Alpert, P., Bone, E. & Holzapfel, C. (2000). Invasiveness, Invasibility and the Role of
Environmental Stress in the Spread of Non-Native Plants. Perspectives in Plant
Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 3, 52-66.
14 DUMITRAȘCU M., SÂRBU A., CÎȘLARIU A.G.
Arianoutsou, M., Bazos, I., Delipetrou, P. & Kokkoris, Y. (2010). The alien flora of
Greece: taxonomy, life traits and habitat preferences. Biological Invasions,
12(10), 3525-3549.
Bernez, I., Aguiar, F., Violle, C. & Ferreira, T. (2006). Invasive river plants from
Portuguese floodplains: What can species attributes tell us?, Hydrobiologia,
570(1), 3-9.
Celesti-Grapow, L., Alessandrini, A., Arrigoni, P.V., Banfi, E., Bernardo, L., Bovio,
M., Brundu, G., Cagiotti, M.R., Camarda, I., Carli, E., Conti, F., Fascetti, S.,
Galasso, G., Gubellini, L., La Valva, V., Lucchese, F., Marchiori, S., Mazzola,
P., Peccenini, S., Poldini, L., Pretto, F., Prosser, F., Siniscalco, C., Villani, M.C.,
Viegi, L., Wilhalm, T. & Blasi, C. (2009). Inventory of the non-native flora of
Italy. Plant Biosystems, 143 (2), 386-430.
DAISIE (2009). Handbook of alien species in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
Camen-Comănescu, P., Negrean, G., Nagodă, E. & Anastasiu, P. (2016). Symphyotrichum
squamatum - a new alien plant in Romania. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 43, 79-84.
Ciocârlan, V. (2009). Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta. Ed.
III. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres.
Daehler, C.C. & Carino, D. A. (2000). Predicting invasive plants: prospects for a
general screening system based on current regional models. Biological Invasions,
2, 93-102.
EPPO (2016). EPPO Global Database. Retrieved November 11, 2016 from:
https://gd.eppo.int.
Fenwick, T. (2001). Tides of change: New themes and questions in workplace learning.
New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 92, 3-18.
Green, P.R. (2007). Aster squamatus could be on its way to you. A new alien for Ireland
and England. BSBI News, 105, 31-32.
Greuter, W. (2003). The Euro+Med treatment of Astereae (Compositae) – generic
concepts and required new names. Willdenowia, 33, 45-47.
Hind, D.J.N. (2011). An annotated preliminary checklist of the Compositae of Bolivia.
Vers. 2. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from: http://www.kew.org/science/
tropamerica/boliviacompositae/checklist.pdf.
Hulme, P.E., Bacher, S., Kenis, M., Klotz, S., Kühn, I., Minchin, D., Nentwig, W.,
Olenin, S., Panov, V., Pergl, J., Pyšek, P., Roques, A., Sol, D., Solarz, W. &
Vilà, M. (2008). Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for
integrating pathways into policy. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 403- 414.
Invasive Plants in Portugal (2013). Aster squamatus (annual saltmarsh aster). Retrieved
October 10, 2023, from: Aster squamatus | Plantas Invasoras em Portugal.
Křivánek, M. & Pyšek, P. (2006). Predicting invasions by woody species in a temperate
zone: a test of three risk assessment schemes in the Czech Republic (Central
Europe). Diversity and Distributions, 12, 319- 327.
Lloret, F., Siscart, D & Dalmases, C. (2004). Canopy recovery after drought dieback in
holm-oak Mediterranean forests of Catalonia (NE Spain). Glob Chang Biol 10,
2092–2099.
Mack, R.N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W.M., Evans, H., Clout, M. & Bazzaz, F.A.
(2000). Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and
control. Ecological Applications 10(3), 689-710.
The anatomical structure of Symphyotrichum squamatum, an alien plant in Romanian Flora 15
Mooney, H.A. & Hobbs, R.J. (2000). Invasive species in a changing world.
Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Moravcova, L., Pyšek, P., Pergl, J., Perglova, I. & Jarošik, V. (2006). Seasonal pattern
of germination and seed longevity in the invasive species Heracleum
mantegazzianum. Preslia, 78, 287-301.
Nesom, G.L. (1994). Review of the taxonomy of Aster sensu lato (Asteraceae;
Astereae), emphasizing the New World species. Phytologia, 77, 141-297.
Nesom, G.L. (2005). Taxonomy of the Symphyotrichum (Aster) subulatum group and
Symphyotrichum (Aster) tenuifolium (Asteraceae: Astereae). Sida, 21, 2125-2140.
Pace, L. & Tammaro, F. (2001). The Main Invasive Alien Plants in the Protected Areas
in Central Italy (Abruzzo). In Visconti G. et al., Global change and protected
areas. Advances in Global Change Research, 9, 495-504. Kluwer academic publ.
Pyšek, P., Prach, K. & Smilauer, P. (1995). Relating invasion success to plant traits: an
analysis of the Czech alien flora. In: Pyšek, P., Prach, K., Rejma´nek, M., Wade,
M. (Eds.), Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special Problems. SPB
Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, 39–60.
Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D.M. (2006). The biogeography of naturalization in alien
plants. J. Biogeogr. 33, 2040-2050.
Richardson, D.M. & Pyšek, P. (2006). Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species
invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 30, 409-431.
Sârbu, A. & Smarandache, D. (2015). Symphyotrichum ciliatum an Invasive Species in
the Romanian Flora - Contributions to the Knowledge of the Vegetative Organs
Structure. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest., 42, 5-22.
Sârbu, A. (1999). Biologie vegetală. Bucureşti: Edit. Universităţii din Bucureşti.
Šajna, N., Kaligarič, M. & Ivajnšič, D. (2014). Reproduction biology of an alien
invasive plant: a case of drought-tolerant Aster squamatus on the Northern
Adriatic seacoast, Slovenia. In Rannow, S., Neubert, M., (eds.). Managing
protected areas in Central and Eastern Europe under climate change (Advances
in global change research 58). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schembri, P.J. & Lanfranco, E. (1996). Introduced species in the Maltese Islands. p. 29-54.
In: Introduction of alien species of flora & fauna. Proceedings of seminar held at
Qawra, Malta, A.E. Baldacchino & A. Pizzuto (Eds), Floriana, Malta,
Environment Protection Department.
Sîrbu, C. (coord.) & Oprea, A. (2011). Plante adventive în flora României. Iaşi: Edit.
“Ion Ionescu de la Brad”.
Stešević, D. & Caković, D. (2013). Contribution to the alien flora of Montenegro and
Supplementum to the Preliminary list of plant invaders. Biologica Nyssana,
4(1-2), 1-7.
Şerbănescu-Jitariu, G., Andrei, M., Rădulescu-Mitroiu, N. & Petria, E. (1983).
Practicum de biologie vegetală. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres.
Toma, C. & Gostin, I. (2000). Histologie vegetală. Iaşi: Edit. Junimea.
Tripathi, A.K & Sharma, J.K (2019). Occurrence of Symphyotrichum squamatum
(Spreng.) G.L. Nesom in Uttar Pradesh, India: a new record. Modern
Phytomorphology. 13, 26-29.
16 DUMITRAȘCU M., SÂRBU A., CÎȘLARIU A.G.
Vilà, M., Basnou, C., Pyšek, P., Josefsson, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Nentwig, W.,
Olenin, S., Roques, A., Roy, D., Hulme, P.E., DAISIE partners (2009). How
well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystem services? A pan
European cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Environ 8, 135-144
Zelnik, I. (2012). The presence of invasive alien plant species in different habitats: case
study from Slovenia. Acta Biol. Slov., 55, 25-38.
*Taxon Profile of Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G.L.Nesom | Florabase
(dbca.wa.gov.au)
Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 2023, 49: 17-24
KHELOUFI Abdenour1*
Abstract: We report the first sighting of Colchicum triphyllum Kunze, from the Belezma
National Park (BNP, Batna, Northeastern Algeria) at 1802 m a.s.l. (Latitude 35°33′ N,
Longitude 5°58′ E). C. triphyllum is known to be present in the North of Algeria, but its
presence had not been confirmed at high altitudes. The observation of a population of 139
flowering individuals and 47 individuals at vegetative growth had taken place in April
2023 while conducting ecological surveys. The species is suggested to be distributed at
elevations ranging from sea level to 1500 m a.s.l. This finding of a population of
C. triphyllum at 1802 m a.s.l. in the BNP represents a new high-altitude register for this
species. The paper describes its distribution, biology, morphology, ecology, phenology,
and also its medicinal properties. Conservation efforts may be necessary to protect and
increase the population size of this rare species.
Keywords: Colchicum triphyllum, Belezma National Park, Distribution, Ecology, Conservation
Introduction
Colchicum belongs to the family Colchicaceae and is a genus consisting of
perennial plants. These particular plants are widely recognized as autumn crocuses,
meadow saffrons, or naked ladies. The genus encompasses approximately 160 species,
naturally occurring in Europe, Asia, and North Africa. Certain species of Colchicum
have additionally been introduced to various regions outside their native range,
including North America, South America, and Australia, where they may have
established themselves as naturalized plants (Chacón et al. 2014).
Among the Liliales, the Colchicaceae family holds the position of being the third
largest family, following the Liliaceae and Smilacaceae families (Vinnersten &
Manning 2007). The genus Colchicum is renowned for its notable anti-inflammatory
and analgesic properties, which are primarily attributed to the presence of the alkaloid
colchicine (Vinnersten & Larsson 2010). Colchicum has a long history of traditional use
as a remedy for gout, effectively reducing the frequency and severity of gout attacks.
Nevertheless, it is important to note that the genus contains various toxic alkaloids,
including colchicine. Ingesting large quantities of these alkaloids can lead to severe
poisoning (Nuki 2008, Larsson & Ronsted, 2014, Mykhailenko et al. 2022). Despite the
inherent toxicity, certain species of Colchicum are cultivated for their ornamental value
due to their captivating flowers, which exhibit a range of attractive colors.
The genus is most diverse in the eastern Mediterranean region, where the highest
number of species is found. According to the Catalogue of Life (2023), a
comprehensive online database of all known species, there are currently 35 species of
Colchicum that are native to the Mediterranean region, with 16 species listed in North
1
Department of Ecology and Environment, University of Batna 2, 05078 Batna, Algeria
* Correspondence: a.kheloufi@univ-batna2.dz
18 KHELOUFI A.
perianth is petaloid, fused at the base into a pedunculate tube and spread at the top into 6
divisions, forming a funnel-shaped structure. The flowers are usually pale pink or white,
although they can also be tinged with purple. Each flower has six petals that are fused at
the base to form a narrow tube, which opens into a wide, flat corolla with a diameter of
2-4 cm. The flowers have a characteristic sweet fragrance and are pollinated by insects.
There are 6 stamens with dorsifixed anthers. The ovary has 3 multiovulate chambers.
The capsule is septicidal. The fruit of C. triphyllum is a three-chambered capsule that
contains numerous small, black seeds. The seeds are dispersed by ants and small
mammals. The seeds are numerous and subglobose. It has two linear or linear-lanceolate
leaves. The leaf blade is divided and measures 12-25 mm in length, with only 5-7 veins.
The anthers are linear. The capsule has carpels contracted into a short beak. The bulb
has brown tunics. It blooms from October to December in clearings, sandy areas,
pastures, and alluvial zones.
state during the dry season. The flowering period of C. triphyllum typically spans from
February to April, contingent upon location and elevation. During this time, the plant
produces one to three flowers that rely on insect pollination. In Mediterranean
ecosystems, C. triphyllum holds significant ecological importance by providing
sustenance and habitat for insects and other small animals. Its presence contributes to
the diversity and stability of these ecosystems (Lentini & Raimondo 1984, Düşen &
Sümbül 2007).
The phenology of C. triphyllum displays variability based on its specific location
and environmental conditions. As a general pattern, the plant initiates growth in late
winter or early spring, typically between the months of February and March. However,
the precise timing of growth initiation is subject to variation, influenced by factors such
as the plant's geographical location and elevation (Malo & Shuka 2013). C. triphyllum
exhibits a distinct flowering period spanning from September to March. The plant's
leaves emerge during the spring season and undergo withering as summer approaches.
C. triphyllum develops fruit capsules that mature and disperse their seeds in late spring
or early summer. During the hot and dry summer months, the plant enters a dormant
state, with the corms remaining underground until the subsequent growing season
(Samaniego & Velasco-Negueruela 1984).
In Algeria, studies have shown that the phenology of C. triphyllum is influenced
by local environmental conditions, such as temperature and rainfall. For example, in the
Tlemcen (NW-Algeria), the plant has been observed to grow and flower earlier in years
with higher spring rainfall (Babali et al. 2018). The plant has a preference for soils that
are rich in organic matter, and it has been reported to grow in soils with a pH range of
6.5 to 7.5. At the sampling site where C. triphyllum was found, the chemical
characteristics of the soil were as follows: pH (1:1 water) 7.36, electrical conductivity
(1:5 soil/water) 232.1 µS.cm−1. This soil is calcareous (48.4% total limestone) and very
rich in organic matter (8.52%).
Medicinal properties. Plants within the Colchicaceae family are primarily
employed in pharmaceutical applications due to their therapeutic properties, including
anti-inflammatory and antitumor activities. These beneficial effects are attributed to the
presence of colchicinoids, a group of alkaloids that includes colchicine and demecolcine
(Alali et al. 2007, Cocco et al. 2010, Toplan et al. 2016). C. triphyllum holds a history
of utilization in traditional medicine for diverse purposes, such as addressing gout,
rheumatism, and edema. It is recognized that C. triphyllum contains multiple alkaloids,
including colchicine and its derivatives, which possess toxicity towards both humans
and animals (Terkeltaub et al. 2010). These compounds are thought to serve as
protective mechanisms for the plant, shielding it against herbivores and pathogens.
Furthermore, the pharmaceutical industry utilizes these alkaloids to develop drugs
aimed at treating conditions such as gout, rheumatism, and cancer (Siddiqui et al. 2022).
According to Senizza et al. (2020), in vitro studies have demonstrated that C.
triphyllum leaf extracts exhibit robust antioxidant capacity. Additionally, each
methanolic extract of C. triphyllum tested exhibited activity against the enzyme
tyrosinase. Significant correlations were observed between the plant's phytochemical
profiles, primarily lignans and tyrosol equivalents, and the observed activities. Despite
the presence of toxic alkaloids, such as colchicine, this research supports the use of
various extraction methods to produce extracts that are rich in (poly)phenols and
alkaloids. These extracts contribute significantly to antioxidant properties and other
First record of Colchicum triphyllum (Colchicaceae) from high altitude in Northeastern Algeria 23
Conclusions
Colchicum triphyllum has previously been documented in North Africa and
several parts of Europe. However, the present study marks a significant milestone as it
offers the first recorded instance of Colchicum triphyllum Kunze thriving at high
altitudes in Northeastern Algeria. This groundbreaking discovery underscores the
importance of conducting further research on this species to gain deeper insights into its
distribution and ecology within the country. In contrast to other known populations of
C. triphyllum in Algeria and across the globe, it becomes evident that the population
discovered within the Belezma National Park is relatively small in size. This
observation raises questions about the factors influencing its structure and ecological
dynamics, especially when compared to more established populations in other regions.
References
Colchicum L. in Catalogue of Life (2023). Checklist dataset accessed via
catalogueoflife.org on 2023-05-01.
Alali, F.Q., Tawaha, K. & El-Elimat, T. (2007). Determination of (-)-demecolcine and
(-)-colchicine content in selected Jordanian Colchicum species. International
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 62, 739-742.
Babali, B., Bouazza, M. & Merzouk, A. (2018). La diversité végétale de la forêt de
Moutas-Tlemcen. Revue Ecologie-Environnement, 14, 2.
Düşen, O. D. & Sümbül, H. (2007). A morphological investigation of Colchicum
L.(Liliaceae) species in the Mediterranean region in Turkey. Turkish Journal of
Botany, 31(5), 373-419.
Chacón, J., Cusimano, N. & Renner, S. S. (2014). The evolution of Colchicaceae, with a
focus on chromosome numbers. Systematic Botany, 39(2), 415-427.
Cocco, G., Chu, D.C. & Pandolfi, S. (2010). Colchicine in Clinical Medicine. A Guide
for Internists. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 21, 503–508.
Dobignard, A. & Chatelain, C. (2010). Index synonymique de la flore d’Afrique du
Nord, volume 1, Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae, Monocotyledoneae. Editions des
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève.
Larsson, S. & Ronsted, N. (2014). Reviewing Colchicaceae alkaloids–perspectives of
evolution on medicinal chemistry. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry,
14(2), 274-289.
Lentini, F. & Raimondo, F. M. (1984). Contribution à la connaissance du genre
Colchicum L. en Sicile. Webbia, 38(1), 747-755.
Nuki, G. (2008). Colchicine: its mechanism of action and efficacy in crystal-induced
inflammation. Current Rheumatology Reports, 10(3), 218-227.
Malo, S. & Shuka, L. (2013). Distribution of Colchicum doerfleri Halácsy, Colchicum
triphyllum Kunze and Colchicum bivonae Guss., in Albania. International
Journal of Ecosystems and Ecology Science, 3(2), 273-278.
24 KHELOUFI A.
Mykhailenko, O., Ivanauskas, L., Bezruk, I., Marksa, M., Borodina, O. & Georgiyants,
V. (2022). Effective and simple approach for colchicine determination in saffron
parts. Food Chemistry, 368, 130862.
Nualart, N., Ibáñez, N., Luque, P., Pedrol, J., Vilar, L. & Guàrdia, R. (2017). Dataset of
herbarium specimens of threatened vascular plants in Catalonia. PhytoKeys, (77), 41.
Quézel, P. & Santa, S. (1962). Nouvelle flore de l'Algérie et des régions désertiques
méridionales. Paris, Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Richard, L. C. (1808). Démonstrations botaniques ou analyse du fruit considéré en
général. Gabon, Librairie, Place de l’Ecole de Médecine, N°2. 111 p.
Samaniego, N. M. & Velasco-Negueruela, A. (1984). “Colchicum triphyllum” en la
provincia de Ciudad Real. Anales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid, 41 (2), 461.
Senizza, B., Rocchetti, G., Okur, M. A., Zengin, G., Yıldıztugay, E., Ak, G.,
Montesano, D. & Lucini, L. (2020). Phytochemical profile and biological
properties of Colchicum triphyllum (Meadow Saffron). Foods, 9(4), 457.
Siddiqui, A. J., Jahan, S., Singh, R., Saxena, J., Ashraf, S.A., Khan, A., Choudhary, R.
K., Balakrishnan, S., Badraoui, R., Bardakci, F. & Adnan, M. (2022). Plants in
anticancer drug discovery: From molecular mechanism to chemoprevention.
BioMed Research International, 18 p., ID 5425485.
Terkeltaub, R. A., Furst, D. E., Bennett, K., Kook, K. A., Crockett, R. S. & Davis, M.
W. (2010). High versus low dosing of oral colchicine for early acute gout flare:
Twenty-four-hour outcome of the first multicenter, randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-comparison colchicine study. Arthritis
& Rheumatology, 62, 1060-1068.
Toplan, G. G., Gurer, C. & Mat, A. (2016). Importance of Colchicum species in modern
therapy and its significance in Turkey. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, 46, 129-144.
Tutiempo (2023). Climate of Batna (Algeria) 2013-2022, Data provided by the weather
station: 604680 (DABT) accessed via https://fr.tutiempo.net/climat/
ws-604680.html on 2023-05-06
Vinnersten, A. & Manning, J. (2007). A new classification of Colchicaceae. Taxon, 56,
171-178.
Vinnersten, A. & Larsson., S. 2010. Colchicine is still a chemical marker for the
expanded Colchicaceae. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 38, 1193-1198.
Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 2023, 49: 25-32
Abstract: Characterised by numerous microclimates that are present from the plain area
and up to the alpine region, the territory of Oltenia previously offered and still manages to
offer surprises from a floristic point of view, as well as from other perspectives.
The recent climate changes have altered the typical habitats of some plants, resulting in
their discovery in areas where, according to the data in the specialized literature, were not
previously known to exist. Among the many species of Poaceae that are present in the
spontaneous flora of Oltenia, there are certain species of sozological and
phytogeographical interest. This is also the case with the species presented in the current
paper, i.e. Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf.
Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf. is an Atlantic-Mediterranean coastal species, found
especially on the western and southern European coastal sands. It is native to northern
Africa, southern and western Europe, western and northern Asia, Japan and the Indian
subcontinent (India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka). The species has been widely
naturalized in southern and eastern Australia, in South Africa, New Zealand, Canada, the
USA, Central and South America, as well as in Hawaii. In Romania, it is known from the
south-eastern part of the country: Tulcea and Constanța counties. In Poiana Brașov and
Vaideeni (Vâlcea County), the species is mentioned as an adventive plant.
The present paper contributes with information regarding the chorology and ecology of
this species.
Keywords: chorology, vulnerable, spontaneous flora, Oltenia, Romania
Introduction
The genus Polypogon belongs to the Poaceae family; in Europe, it is represented
by three species: Polypogon viridis (Gouan) Breistr., P. monspeliensis (L.) Desf. and
P. maritimus Willd (Tutin 1980). The first of these species is perennial, while the last
two are annual plants.
In the spontaneous flora of Romania, Polypogon monspeliensis is the only
species that belongs to the Polypogon genus (Ciocârlan 2000, 2009; Sârbu et al. 2013).
The Romanian botanical literature presents it as a rare plant (Beldie 1979;
Ciocârlan 2000, 2009; Oprea 2005; Sârbu et al. 2013). Certain authors consider that it is
a taxon with uncertain status (Sârbu & Oprea 2011).
In Romania, the species is known from the south-eastern part of the country, i.e.
from Tulcea and Constanța counties (Panțu et al. 1935; Morariu 1957, 1965; Șerbănescu
1972; Dihoru & Negrean 1975; Făgăraș & Gomoiu 2002; Oprea 2005). From Poiana
Brașov, it is mentioned as an adventive species (Dihoru & Negrean 2009; Sârbu et al. 2013).
1
University of Craiova, Faculty of Horticulture, Craiova, Romania
2
University of Craiova, Faculty of Agronomy, Craiova, Romania
* Correspondence: radutoiudaniel@yahoo.com
26 RĂDUȚOIU D., NICULESCU M.
For the territory of Oltenia, the species was firstly mentioned by the co-author of
the present paper, within the Upper Catchment of the Luncavăț river (Niculescu 2009).
Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf. FI. Atl. 1: 67 (1798). (Poaceae) (Şerbănescu
1972, Tutin 1980). [HMR 769 - Săvulescu 1939; FEGL 43 -Todor 1959]. It represents a
vulnerable, coastal, Atlantic-Mediterranean species (Ciocârlan 2009), which is found
especially on the western and southern European coastal sands. According to some
authors, it is considered indigenous on the shores of the Black Sea (Brândză 1898;
Morariu 1965; Șerbănescu, in Săvulescu 1972; Oprea 2005) and in the Danube Delta
(Panțu et al. 1935; Morariu 1965; Șerbănescu, in Săvulescu 1972; Ciocârlan 1994; Sanda
et al. 2008). It is native to northern Africa, southern and western Europe, western and
northern Asia, Japan and the Indian subcontinent (India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka).
The species has been widely naturalized in southern and eastern Australia, in South
Africa, New Zealand, Canada, the USA, Central and South America, as well as in
Hawaii. It is a taxon situated at the north-eastern limit of the typical area (Dihoru &
Negrean 2009).
In the south-eastern part of Romania, where this species has a good
representation, it creates a well-assembled vegetal layer, which is classified by certain
botanists in the association Polypogonetum monspeliensis Morariu 1957 (Morariu 1965;
Sanda et al. 2008). It is also mentioned as an accompanying species, in the
phytocoenoses of the associations Hyppophaë-Salicetum elaeagni Br.-Bl. et Volk 1940
from the Danube Delta (Hanganu et al. 2002), Potentillo supinae – Petunietum
parviflorae Dihoru & Negrean 1975 (Dihoru & Negrean 1976), on Grindul Lupilor
[Sandbank of the Wolves] in Bolboschoenetum maritimi Eggler 1933 (Sârbu et al.
2000) and on Saele – Istria Sandbank in Bassietum hirsutae Șerbănescu 1965 (Ștefan
et al. 2001).
Through this work, we contribute to the knowledge of the chorology of the
Polypogon monspeliensis species, based on data collected from the field, in conjunction
with those existing in herbaria in the country and phytosociological literature.
Due to the climatic conditions in which it grows, this plant can be successfully used for
ornamental purposes, especially in the settlements located in the southern areas of Romania.
The distribution maps were achieved by using the Corolog 2010 program, which
is a product of the Institute of Biology - Bucharest (RoBioAtlas 2003).
The program uses an Access database, with information originating in the
specialized literature, in herbaria and in the field, as well as two types of maps, i.e. the
map of average annual temperatures in Romania (Fig. 5) and the map of average annual
precipitation in Romania (Fig. 6).
Conclusions
The present research contributes with significant information regarding the
chorology of the species Polypogon monspeliensis (L.) Desf. in Romania.
If we consider the extensive areas of sandy lands to the left of the Jiu River, it's
possible that the habitat of this species may expand in the near future. However, when
we analyse the significant impact of zoo-anthropogenic factor in the areas where the
species was found, especially on the sandy lands, along with the recent decrease in
precipitation in this region, it's evident that the species' state is not favourable. This is
why we consider it's essential to protect this species in Romania.
If we consider the fact that the sites where the plant was found belong to the
natural protected area ROSCI0045 Coridorul Jiului, we consider that the presence of the
Polypogon monspeliensis species in this part of the country could be a longstanding one.
30 RĂDUȚOIU D., NICULESCU M.
ROSPA0010 Bistreț and the nature reserves Locul Fosilifer Drănic - 2391 and Pădurea
Zăval [Zăval Forest] - IV.33".
At the same time we want to thank our colleagues Mihai Pușcaș (Babeș Bolyai
University, Cluj Napoca), Irina Irimia (“Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University, Iași) and
Sorin Ștefănuț (Institute of Biology of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest), for their
support in providing the herbarium information.
References
Beldie, A. (1979). Flora României. Determinator ilustrat al plantelor vasculare II.
Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei Române.
Brândză, D. (1898). Flora Dobrogei. Bucureşti, Inst. Arte Graf. Carol Göbl.
Ciocârlan,V. (1994). Flora Deltei Dunării. Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres.
Ciocârlan, V. (2000). Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta
(ed. II). Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres.
Ciocârlan, V. (2009). Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta
(ed. III). Edit. Ceres, Bucureşti.
Dihoru, G. & Negrean, G. (1975). Cenotaxoni noi din Al. Polygonion avicularis. St.
Cerc. Biol. Ser. Biol. Veget., 27(1), 3-8.
Dihoru, G. & Negrean, G. (1976). Sintaxoni specifici Deltei Dunării. Peuce. Muz. Deltei
Dunării. Tulcea, 5, 101-118.
Dihoru, G. & Negrean, G. (2009). Cartea roşie a plantelor vasculare din România.
Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei Române.
Făgăraș, M. & Gomoiu, M.T. (2002). The conspectus of vascular flora from Romanian
Black Sea shore. “Ovidius” University from Constanța. Annals of Natural
Science, Ser. Biol. Ecol., 6, 1-50.
Hanganu, J., Grigoraş, I., Stefan, N., Sârbu, I., Dubyna, D., Zhmud, E., Menke, U. &
Drost, H. (2002). Vegetation of the Biosphere Reserve “Danube Delta” with
Transboundary Vegetation Map. RIZA raport 2002.049.
Morariu, I. (1957). Contribuții la cunoașterea vegetației litoralului Mării Negre. Bul. Șt.
Secț. Biol.-Șt. Agr. (Ser. Bot.). Acad. Română, 9 (4), 361-382.
Morariu, I. (1965). Câteva aspecte din flora litoralului Mării Negre. Agigea, Eforie N,
Eforie S. Stud. Com. Biol., Ser. Bot., 17(4-5), 503-509.
Niculescu, M. (2009). Flora şi vegetaţia bazinului superior al râului Luncavăţ. Craiova:
Edit. Sitech.
Oprea, A. (2005). Lista critică a plantelor vasculare din România. Iaşi: Edit. Univ.
“Al. I. Cuza”.
Panţu, Z., Solacolu, T. & Paucă, A. (1935). Contribuţiuni la flora Deltei Dunării. Mem.
Sect. Şti,. Acad. Rom., ser. III, 11(2), 1-57.
Prodan, I. (1914). Contribuţiune la flora României. Analele Acad. Române, Mem. Sect.
Şti., 36, 249-304.
Prodan, I. (1935). Conspectul florei Dobrogei: partea a I-a. Bul. Acad. Înalte Stud.
Agron., Cluj Napoca, 5(1), 1-170.
Prodan, I.(1939). Flora pentru determinarea şi descrierea plantelor ce cresc în
România Ed. 2., Cluj: Tipografia Cartea Românească.
RoBioAtlas, (2023). Romanian Atlas Web App for Biology - Open Access. Available
online: https://www.teon.ro/robioatlas/index.html (accessed on 2023.3.8)
32 RĂDUȚOIU D., NICULESCU M.
Sanda, V., Öllerer, K. & Burescu, P. (2008). Fitocenozele din România. Sintaxonomie,
structură, dinamică şi evoluţie. București: Edit. Ars Docenti.
Sârbu I., Ştefan N., Oprea A. & Zamfirescu O. (2000). Flora şi vegetaţia rezervaţiei naturale
Grindul Lupilor (Rezervaţia Biosferei Delta Dunării). Bul. Grăd. Bot. Iaşi, 9, 91-124.
Sârbu, I., Ştefan, N. & Oprea, A. (2013). Plante vasculare din România. Bucureşti:
Edit. Victor B Victor.
Sîrbu, C. & Oprea, A. (2011). Plante adventive în flora României. Iaşi: Edit. Ion
Ionescu de la Brad.
Șerbănescu, I. (1972). Polypogon. In Săvulescu Tr. (edit.). Flora României. Vol. XII:
140-143. București: Edit. Academiei Române.
Ştefan, N., Sarbu, I., Oprea, A. & Zamfirescu, O. (2001). Contribuţii la cunoaşterea
vegetaţiei grindurilor Chituc şi Saele-Istria. Bul. Grăd. Bot. Iaşi, 10, 99-122.
Topographical Map, 1:25,000; Elevation: Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, 30 m.
GIS processing.
Tutin, T.G. (1980). Polypogon. In Tutin T.G., Heywood V.H., Burges N.A., Moore
D.M., Valentine D.H., Walters S.M., Webb D.A. (eds.) (1964-1980). Flora
Europaea, Vol. V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 2023, 49: 33-38
Abstract: The presence of species Allium inaequale in the flora of Moldova (eastern
Romania), has been reported in this paper, based on specimens collected by authors on the
field, as well as on specimens stored in public herbaria. The species has been identified in
arid grasslands of two nature reserves from the Central Moldavian Plateau (Vaslui
County), namely: “Coasta Rupturile” Tanacu and “Movila lui Burcel” Miclești. This is a
very rare plant species in Romania, found at the most western limit of its general range,
and should be included, as vulnerable, in the Romanian Red List of Vascular Plants. We
have also found that the registration of the species A. moschatum in the flora of Moldova
was due to misidentification. Based on the current data, A. moschatum, should be replaced
in the flora of this historical province by A. inaequale.
Keywords: Coasta Rupturile, Movila lui Burcel, Red List of Vascular Plants, section
Scorodon
Introduction
Allium inaequale Janka, Linnaea 30, 603 (1860), is a Central Asian - West
Pontic plant species (Vvedenskii 1968). It is distributed in the Aralo-Caspian basin
(Central Asia) (Vvedenskii 1968; Fedorov 1979), the Southern and Central European
Russia (Vvedenskii 1968; Fedorov 1979; Didukh et al. 2018), Ukraine (Donetsk,
Crimea) (Prokudin et al. 1987), the Republic of Moldova (Fedorov 1979; Negru 2007;
Ghendov & Ciocârlan 2015; Pînzaru & Sîrbu 2016; Cassir et al. 2020) and Romania
(Ciocârlan 1994, 2009; Sârbu et al. 2013).
Towards the western limit of its natural area, A. inaequale is more and more rare
and, as a consequence of isolated populations and the destruction of habitats,
increasingly vulnerable (Ghendov 2014; Ghendov & Ciocârlan 2015). Accordingly, it
has been listed in the IUCN Red List categories of vascular plant species of the
Ukrainian flora: Least-concern (LC) (Onyshchenko et al. 2022); the Red Book of the
Republic of Moldova: Vulnerable (VU) (Ghendov 2014; Ghendov & Ciocârlan 2015;
Cassir et al. 2020), and the European Red List of Vascular Plants: Data deficient (DD)
(Bilz et al. 2011).
Regarding ecological preferences, A. inaequale is known (Sârbu et al. 2013) as
heliophilous, thermophilous, xerophilous and saxicolous (calciphilous) – L9T8U1R8 (see
also Ciocârlan 1994).
Beyond the eastern border of Romania, this species grows on dry rocky steppe
grasslands (on limestone, chalk, and sands) (Vvedenskii 1968; Fedorov 1979; Ghendov
2014; Ghendov & Ciocârlan 2015), as well as in steppe areas with loess soils (Ghendov
1
University of Life Sciences “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, Iaşi, Romania;
2
University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” of Iaşi, Botanical Garden “Anastasie Fătu”, Iaşi, Romania.
*
Correspondence: csirbu@uaiasi.ro
34 SÎRBU C., OPREA A.
2014; Ghendov & Ciocârlan 2015; Cassir et al. 2020). Within the areas of Don and
Volga River basins, A. inaequale is a diagnostic species for the EUNIS Habitat type
R15 – Continental dry rocky steppic grassland and dwarf scrub on chalk outcrops
(Chytrý et al. 2020), with usually open vegetation of the ord. Thymo cretacei-Hyssopetalia
cretacei Didukh 1989 (see Didukh et al. 2018).
In Romania, A. inaequale has been known so far on stony, calcareous places,
from only a few localities in Dobrogea (Constanța and Tulcea Counties) and Muntenia
(Prahova County). Although Zahariadi (1966) stated that it is possible for A. inaequale
to be present in Romania (Dobrogea), evidences were brought only since 1994, when
Ciocârlan first reported A. inaequale in the country, from Baltăgești (Constanța
County), on the Alah Bair Hill (Herb. Inst. Agron. București, no. 22711). According to
the cited author, in this locality A. inaequale is accompanied by other saxicolous species
such as A. saxatile, Agropyron brandzae, Hedysarum grandiflorum, etc. Subsequently,
Negrean (2011) reported A. inaequale in three other localities as follows: Tulcea
County, at Greci (Herb. GN, Măcin Mountains, in saxosis, 08.1963, legit. et det.
G. Negrean, as A. moschatum) and north of Baia (Herb. GN no. 3136, cariera vetusta,
in saxosis calcareis, legit. et det. G. Negrean, 23.08.2002); Prahova County, at Stânca
Tohanilor (Herb. GN, in saxosis calcareis, legit. et det. G. Negrean, as A. moschatum,
03.10.1966 and 06.08.1967). According to Sârbu et al. (2013), in Romania,
A. inaequale is diagnostic for the alliance Pimpinello-Thymion zygioides Dihoru et
Doniță 1970, which includes xerophilous rocky steppic dwarf-shrub rich grasslands on
steep calcareous slopes of Dobrogea and north-eastern Bulgaria (see Coldea 2012 and
Mucina et al. 2016).
Among the 25 indigenous species of Allium reported from Romania so far (Sârbu
et al. 2013), A. inaequale is most similar to A. moschatum L. (a species with a native
range in the Mediterranean region) (Zahariadi 1966; Vvedenskii 1968; Stearn 1980;
Ciocârlan 1994), with which it was actually misidentified, in some cases, as already
shown by Negrean (2011). Related to this, it is worth noting that, according to
Vvedenskii (1968), “The typical A. inaequale occurs beyond the Volga. The form
growing to the west in the southern part of the European USSR displays characteristics
of transition towards A. moschatum, although still closer to A. inaequale". The two
species are the only representatives of sect. Scorodon Koch in the flora of Romania
(Stearn 1980).
The botanical description of both species and the differences between them are
presented (including by identification keys), in numerous relevant references, such as:
Vvedenskii (1968); Fedorov (1979); Stearn (1980); Prokudin et al. (1987); Ciocârlan
(1994, 2009); Sârbu et al. (2013). According to these authors, A. inaequale is
characterized by pedicels of 10-30 (-40) mm, very unequal, (2) 3-6 (-10) times as long
as perianth; tepals of 4-5 (-6) mm long; stamens ca. 2/3-3/4 as long as tepals; leaves
wilting before anthesis (versus pedicels of 10-15 mm, ± equal, up to 2 times longer than
perianth; tepals of 6.5-7.5 mm long; stamens ca. 1/2-2/3 as long as tepals; leaves
persistent nearly to fruiting, in A. moschatum).
The purpose of this paper is to document the presence of A. inaequale in
Moldova (eastern Romania), and to demonstrate that this species has been previously
reported as A. moschatum within THE NAME OF province.
A new registration in the vascular flora of Moldova (Eastern Romania): Allium inaequale 35
Fig. 1. Umbels of: a) Allium inaequale (“Movila lui Burcel” Nature Reserve, Herb.
IASI, no. 18049, legit. et det. C. Sîrbu, 19.08.2018); b) A. moschatum (Ghiaur
Suiciuc-Caliacra, Herb. I, no. 89889; legit. et det. P. Enculescu, 09.09.1934).
Scales are expressed in mm. Photos: C. Sîrbu.
36 SÎRBU C., OPREA A.
to 3.8 times; tepals of 4.3-4.5 mm long; stamens of ca. 3/4 as long as tepals (Fig. 1a);
leaves dried up at flowering. An umbel of A. moschatum is shown for comparison in
Fig. 1b.
Within the above mentioned two nature reserves, the species is represented by
small populations (several tens of individuals), scattered in arid grasslands of ass.
Taraxaco serotini-Festucetum valesiacae (Răvăruț et al. 1956) Sârbu et al. 1999 subass.
bothriochloetosum ischaemi Chifu et al. 2006 (all. Jurineo arachnoideae-Euphorbion
steposae Dobrescu (1971) Coldea & Sârbu 2012; see Coldea 2012), on steep slopes,
with eroded chernozems and exposed loessoid deposits (Habitat type – Nature 2000:
62C0* Ponto-Sarmatic steppes; see Gafta & Mountford 2008).
From the same localities, the closely related species A. moschatum L. was
previously reported, as follows: “Tanacu on the «Coasta Rupturile», in the grassland
with Bothriochloa ischaemum" (Ghișa & Vițălariu 1969); “in stony, strongly eroded
ecotopes, on the south-eastern promontory of the «Movila lui Burcel» Nature Reserve"
(Dobrescu & Leocov 1982). Beldie (1979) also reported A. moschatum from two other
localities, namely Unțești and Satu Nou-Solești (Vaslui County), the second one located
in the vicinity of the “Movila lui Burcel” Nature Reserve.
However, Ciocârlan (2009) suggested the possibility that in the cited localities
from the Vaslui County there is rather A. inaequale instead of A. moschatum. Following
this suggestion, during the year of 2022, we undertook a study in public herbaria
(I, IAGB, IASI, CL, BUC, BUCA), in order to identify possible specimens of A.
moschatum collected from the Vaslui County, and to verify whether the respective
specimens do not actually belong to the species A. inaequale. As a result of this study,
we found a total of five herbarium sheets, with several specimens collected from
“Coasta Rupturile” and “Movila lui Burcel” Nature Reserves, all labelled as A.
moschatum L. All these specimens have the same characteristics as those collected by
us (see above) and consequently undoubtedly fit to A. inaequale. The five herbarium
sheets are as follows:
- Herb. CL, no. 507648: Tanacu (Vaslui County), dry, arid slopes (legit. et det.
Gh. Vițălariu & E. Ghișa, 18.08.1967, as A. moschatum L.; rev. C. Sîrbu, 25.11.2022);
- Herb. I, no. 69029 and 69036: Miclești (Vaslui County), “Movila lui Burcel”
Nature Reserve (legit. et det. C. Dobrescu, 02.08.1972, as A. moschatum L.; rev. C.
Sîrbu, 05.10.2022);
- Herb. I, no. 69017: idem (legit. et det. C. Dobrescu, 04.08.1972, as A.
moschatum L.; rev. C. Sîrbu, 05.10.2022);
- Herb. IAGB, no. 18477: idem (legit. I. Căpălnășan, det. I. Sârbu, 09.08.1973, as
A. moschatum L.; rev. C. Sîrbu & A. Oprea, 05.10.2022).
No specimen of Allium collected from the two localities mentioned by Beldie
(1979) has been identified in the mentioned herbaria. Considering the above, we assume
that Beldie's data must be reported rather to A. inaequale instead of A. moschatum.
Considering the rarity of the species A. inaequale in Romania, at the western
limit of its general range of distribution, the small, isolated populations and the
vulnerable habitats, we consider that it should be included in the Red List/ Book of
vascular plants in Romania, as Vulnerable (VU).
Note. We also found A. inaequale to the west of Palazu Mic Village, Constanța
County (N 44.44375, E 28.51748): xerophilous grassland, on eastern slope, with
calcareous substrate (Herb. IASI, nr. 18051; legit. et det. C. Sîrbu & A. Oprea,
08.08.2021).
A new registration in the vascular flora of Moldova (Eastern Romania): Allium inaequale 37
Conclusions
Based on our own field research and the review of some specimens stored in
public herbaria in Romania, we report in this paper the species A. inaequale for the first
time in the vascular flora of Moldova (eastern Romania).
This is a very rare plant, found here at the western limit of its general range of
distribution, and should be included, as vulnerable, in the Red List of vascular plants in
Romania.
Based on the current data, the species A. moschatum, which has been previously
reported from Moldova as a result of misidentification, must be changed in the flora of
this historical province by A. inaequale.
References
Beldie, Al. (1979). Flora României. Determinator ilustrat al plantelor vasculare,
Vol. 2. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. R. S. România, 406 pp.
Bilz, M., Kell, S.P., Maxted, N. & Lansdown, R.V. (2011). European Red List of
Vascular Plants, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Cassir, P., Izverscaia, T., Ciocârlan, N. & Ghendov, V. (2020). Rare Allium L. species
in steppic habitat of RAMSAR site “Lower Prut Lakes”. Journal of Botany,
12(1, 20), 79-85.
Ciocârlan, V. (1994). Completări la flora României. Stud. Cerc. Biol., ser. Biol. Veget.,
46(2), 113-116.
Ciocârlan, V. (2009). Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta.
București: Edit. Ceres, 1141 pp.
Coldea, Gh. (ed.) (2012). Les associations végétales de Roumanie. Tome 2, Les associations
anthropogènes. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Univ. Clujeană, 482 pp.
Didukh, Y., Chusova, O. & Demina, O. (2018). Syntaxonomy of chalk outcrop
vegetation of the order Thymo cretacei-Hyssopetalia cretacei. Hacquetia, 17(1),
85-109.
Dobrescu, C. & Leocov, M. (1982). Contribuții floristice în rezervația naturală “Movila
lui Burcel” Miclești (jud. Vaslui). Culeg. Stud. Art. Biol., Grăd. Bot. Univ.
“Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Iași, 2, 211-221.
Fedorov, A.A. (ed.) (1979). Flora partis Europaeae U.R.S.S., vol. 4. Leningrad: Nauka,
355 p.p. (in Russian).
Gafta, D. & Mountford, O. (coord.) (2008). Manual de interpretare a habitatelor
Natura 2000 din România. Cluj-Napoca: Risoprint, 101 pp.
Ghendov, V. & Ciocârlan, N. (2015). Allium inaequale Janka, pp. 118. In: Duca, Gh. et
al. (eds), Cartea Roșie a Republicii Moldova. Chișinău: Edit. Ştiinţa.
Ghendov, V. (2014). Notes on some threatened monocotyledones in the flora of
Republic of Moldova. Mediul Ambiant, 3(75), 1-1.
Ghișa, E. & Vițălariu, Gh. (1969). Plante noi sau rare din bazinul Crasnei (Podișul
Central Moldovenesc). Contrib. Bot. /1969/, 127-136.
Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H. & Barnett, L.C. (1990). Index herbariorum, Part I:
the herbaria of the world (Regnum Veg., vol. 120). New York: New York
Botanical Garden Press.
Mucina, L., Bültmann, H., Dierßen, K., Theurillat, J.-P., Raus, Th. et al. (2016).
Vegetation of Europe: Hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular
38 SÎRBU C., OPREA A.
SÎRBU Culiță1*
Abstract: In this paper, Acalypha rhomboidea (Euphorbiaceae) is reported for the first
time, as a neophyte, in the vascular flora of Romania. We have identified small
populations of this species native to North America, in the central area of the Iași city
(north-eastern Romania), as a weed in a garden of ornamental plants, near the Palace of
Culture. Most likely it has been introduced here accidentally, by importing contaminated
growing medium for gardens. It produces viable seeds and seems to survive here for more
than 10 years despite regular weed control. The morphology of this species is described
based on field and herbarium specimens, and checked on literature data. The paper also
includes some data on general distribution and favourite habitats of this species, as well as
two identification keys.
Keywords: Acalyphoideae, alien plants, Euphorbiaceae, identification keys, neophytes
Introduction
The genus Acalypha L. (Sp. Pl. 2: 1003. 1753) belongs to the family
Euphorbiaceae Juss., subfam. Acalyphoideae Asch., tribe Acalypheae Dumort., subtribe
Acalyphinae Griseb. (Webster 1975, 1994). With ca. 500 species, Acalypha is the third
largest genus of Euphorbiaceae, after Euphorbia L. and Croton L. (Cardiel & Rodriguez
2015; Cardiel et al. 2022; Montero-Muñoz et al. 2021).
The species of Acalypha are distributed in the tropical and subtropical regions
worldwide, with New World as home to around two thirds of them, but some species
are found in temperate regions (Mohlenbrock 1931; Webster 1994; Gordillo et al. 2002;
Cardiel & Rodriguez 2015; Levin 2016; Cardiel et al. 2022).
According to Webster (1994) the combination of characters by which Acalypha
differs from other Euphorbiaceae is as follows: latex absent; leaves alternate, unlobed,
stipulate; inflorescences usually spicate, bisexual or unisexual (when bisexual, pistillate
flowers proximal and staminate distal, rarely vice versa); foliaceous bracts subtending
the pistillate flowers usually enlarged in fruit; staminate flowers with 4 distinct tepals
and 4-8 distinct stamens, with anther sacs pendulous and vermiform and pollen grains
porate, rugulose; pistillate flowers with 3 (-5) distinct tepals, ovary (2-) 3 - locular, with
1 ovule per locule, styles distinct or connate basally, multifid or laciniate (rarely entire);
fruit capsular; seeds ± carunculate. In addition to normal pistillate flowers, some species
produce allomorphic flowers, usually long-pedicelate, ebracteate, with fewer carpels
(usually 1), and the axis of the ovary turned almost 180º so that the style is sub-basal
(Radcliffe-Smith 1973).
Six species of Acalypha have been reported as alien plants in Europe so far, all
of them being monoecious annual herbs, namely:
1
University of Life Sciences “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, Iaşi, Romania;
*Correspondence: csirbu@uaiasi.ro
40 SÎRBU C.
- Acalypha australis L. – native to eastern Asia (Hauxing & Gilbert 2008; Levin
2016): Caucasus (naturalised) (Poyarkova 1974), Ukraine (naturalised) (Poyarkova
1974; Shevera & Kish 2018), Italy (naturalised) (Conti et al. 2005; Celesti-Grapow et
al. 2009, 2010; Galasso et al. 2018a,b), Switzerland (naturalised?) (Mangili et al. 2016),
Bulgaria (naturalised; formerly mistakenly reported as A. virginica) (Petrova 2017), and
Austria (Pilsl 2022); the species has been also reported from Turkey (Duman &
Terzioğlu 2009; Uludağ et al. 2017);
- Acalypha indica L. – native to tropical Asia and Africa (Hauxing & Gilbert
2008; Radcliffe-Smith 2011): ?Caucasus (according to Poyarkova 1974, records from
this area are probably incorrect since all the examined specimens determined as A.
indica should be referred to A. australis); Belgium (casual) (Verloove 2006);
- Acalypha mexicana Müll. Arg. – native from central Mexico to Guatemala
(Steinmann & Felger 1997; Levin 2016): France (naturalized) (Thellung 1912);
however, not mentioned in the Flora Europaea (Tutin 1968);
- Acalypha ostryifolia Riddell – native to North America (Levin 2016): Italy
(casual) (Celesti-Grapow et al. 2009, 2010; Galasso et al. 2018b);
- Acalypha rhomboidea Raf., native to North America (Levin 2016): Portugal
(naturalized) (Almeida & Matos 2006) and Italy (naturalized) (Di Pietro et al. 2021);
- Acalypha virginica L. – native to North America (Levin 2016): France
(naturalized) (Thellung 1912), Italy (naturalized to invasive) (Tutin 1968; Conti et al.
2005; Celesti-Grapow et al. 2009, 2010; Galasso et al. 2018b), Switzerland
(naturalized) (Tutin 1968; Wittenberg 2005), Austria (naturalized) (Tutin 1968; Essl &
Rabitsch 2002; Fischer 2018); however, according to Euro+Med (2006+) this species is
present only in Madeira archipelago, as casual.
Based on data from the literature (Mohlenbrock 1931; Correll & Johhnston 1970;
Poyarkova 1974; Steinmann & Felger 1997; Rhoads & Block 2007; Hauxing & Gilbert
2008; Radcliffe-Smith 2011; Levin 2016), these six species can be distinguished as
follows:
1a. Blade base cordate; inflorescences unisexual ........................................ A. ostryifolia
1b. Blade base cuneate to obtuse; inflorescences bisexual ............................................. 2
2a. Pistillate bracts margins shallowly incised (crenate or repand-dentate) .................... 3
2b. Pistillate bracts margins deeply incised, at least 1/3 of the bract length (lobed) ...... 5
3a. Pistillate bracts usually 1 or 2, (10-) 14-25 mm long, ovate-cordate; allomorphic
pistillate flower usually absent (if present, 2-carpellate); capsule ca. 4 mm in diam.;
seeds smooth ............................................................................................. A. australis
3b. Pistillate bracts 3-9, 5-10 mm long, ovate-cordate or suborbicular; allomorphic
pistillate flowers present, 1 - carpellate, at the inflorescence apex; capsule ca. 2 mm
in diam.; seeds minutely puncticulate ........................................................................ 4
4a. Pistillate bracts ca. 5 mm, margins repand-dentate (teeth not rounded at the apex)
........................................................................................................................ A. indica
4b. Pistillate bracts ca. 10 mm, crenate (teeth rounded at the apex) ............. A. mexicana
5a. Stems hirsute with spreading hairs. Leaves narrowly rhombic to broadly lanceolate.
Pistillate bract abaxial surfaces hirsute, and sometimes stipitate-glandular, with (9-)
10-14 (-16) lobes triangular, 1/4 - 1/2 of bract length; allomorphic pistillate flowers
absent ........................................................................................................ A. virginica
5b. Stems glabrous or with incurved hairs. Leaves ovate to broadly rhombic. Pistillate
bract abaxial surfaces sparsely pubescent, stipitate-glandular, with (5-) 7-9 (-11)
Acalypha rhomboidea in the vascular flora of Romania 41
lobes lanceolate to triangular, 1/3 - 3/4 of bract length; allomorphic pistillate flowers
rare, solitary in axils near base of stem ............................................... A. rhomboidea
None of the Acalypha species has been reported from Romania so far (see
Prodan 1953; Oprea 2005; Ciocârlan 2009; Sârbu et al. 2013). In this paper we report A.
rhomboidea as a new record in the vascular flora of the country.
The above features fit very well with descriptions of A. rhomboidea published
by Mohlenbrock (1931), Correll & Johhnston (1970), Levin (2016) and Rhoads &
Block (2007).
1b. Plants without latex; inflorescences spiciform or paniculate; the staminate flowers
with at least 4 stamens, the pistillate ones with 2-3 carpels; perianth present ........... 2
2a. Leaves palmate lobed; stipules connate into a sheath, deciduous; inflorescence
terminal, paniculate, with cymules of staminate flowers proximal, and pistillate
flowers distal; stamens many, filaments connate into branching fascicles; capsules
large, 13-15 mm; seeds carunculate ................................................................ Ricinus
2b. Leaves not lobed; stipules free, persistent; inflorescences axillary, unisexual or
bisexual, spiciform; stamens not connate into fascicles; capsules much smaller;
seeds carunculate or not ............................................................................................. 3
3a. Plants dioecious; leaves opposite; staminate flowers with 3 tepals and 8-12 stamens;
pistillate flowers 2-carpellate, with 3 tepals, and 2 subulate nectaries, not-subtending
by foliaceous bracts enlarging in fruit; anther-sacs not vermiform; pollen colporate;
seeds carunculate ...................................................................................... Mercurialis
3b. Plants monoecious (as in A. rhomboidea) or dioecious; leaves alternate; staminate
flowers with 4 tepals and 4-8 stamens; pistillate flowers (1-2-)3-carpellate, with 3 tepals
(nectaries absent), subtending by foliaceous bracts enlarging in fruit; anther-sacs
vermiform and pendulous; pollen porate; caruncle minute or absent .....……
………………………………………………………………………………Acalypha
Conclusions
Acalypha rhomboidea, native to North America, is reported here for the first
time in the spontaneous flora of Romania, based on field and herbarium specimens.
It has been identified in the central area of the Iași city (north-eastern Romania),
as a weed in a garden of ornamental plants, near the Palace of Culture.
We suppose that this neophyte was accidentally introduced in north-eastern
Romania through growing medium for ornamental plants from import, contaminated
with weed seeds.
References
Almeida, J.D. & Matos, A.C. (2006). Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. (Euphorbiaceae),
naturalized in Portugal (new for Europe). Stud. Bot., Univ. de Salamanca, 25,
137-138.
Cardiel, J.M. & Rodriguez, P.M. (2015). Synopsis of Acalypha (Euphorbiaceae) of
Argentina, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 101, 384-405.
Cardiel Sanz, J.M. (1994). Revisión taxonómica del género Acalyphá L. (Euphorbtaceae)
en Colombia. Tesis doctoral. Univ. Complutense de Madrid.
Cardiel, J.M., Dorda, E., Muñoz, P. & Pardo de Santayana, M. (2022). Acalypha
Taxonomic Information System (http://www.acalypha.es/; accessed: 08.10.2022).
Cardiel, J.M., Cordeiro de Sousa, A.A., Cordeiro, I., Caruzo, M.B.R., Marques da Silva,
O.L., Muñoz‑Rodriguez, P., López, A. & Montero‑Munoz, I. (2022). Updated
Acalypha rhomboidea in the vascular flora of Romania 45
Hauxing, Q., Gilbert, M.G. (2008). Acalypha L. In Wu, Zy, Raven, P.H. & Deyuan, H.
(eds), vol. 11, pp. 251-255. Science Press, Beijing, & Missouri Bot. Garden
Press, St Louis.
Holmgren, P.K., Holmgren, N.H. & Barnett, L.C. (1990). Index herbariorum, Part I:
The herbaria of the world (Regnum Veg., vol. 120). New York: New York
Botanical Garden Press.
Levin, G.A. (1999). Notes on Acalypha (Euphorbiaceae) in North America. Rhodora,
101, 217-233.
Levin, G.A. (2016). Acalypha Linnaeus (including iconography, by Alonge, B.). In:
Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds) 1993+, Flora of North
America (North of Mexico), Vol. 12. New York & Oxford (http://beta.
floranorthamerica.org/Acalypha; accesed: 08.10.2022).
Mangili, S., Schoenenberger, N. & Frey, D. (2016). Ritrovamento di tre specie vegetali
nuove per la Svizzera e di un taxon raro considerato regionalmente scomparso.
Boll. Soc. Ticinese Sci. Nat., 104, 29-36.
Mohlenbrock, R.H. (1931). The illustrated flora of Illinois. Basswoods to spurges.
Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
Montero-Muñoz, I., Cardiel, J.M. & Levin, G.A. (2018). Nomenclatural review of
Acalypha (Euphorbiaceae) of the Western Indian Ocean Region (Madagascar, the
Comoros Archipelago, the Mascarene Islands and the Seychelles Archipelago).
PhytoKeys, 108, 85-116.
Montero-Muñoz, I., Levin, G.A., Cardiel, J.M. (2020). Four new species of Acalypha L.
(Euphorbiaceae, Acalyphoideae) from the West Indian Ocean Region.
PhytoKeys, 140, 57-73.
Montero-Muñoz, I., Levin, G.A. & Cardiel, J.M. (2021). Four new species of Acalypha
L. (Euphorbiaceae, Acalyphoideae) from Madagascar, with notes about their
conservation status. South African J. Bot., 146, 1-9.
Oprea, A. (2005). Lista critică a plantelor vasculare din România. Iași: Edit. Univ.
“Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, 668 pp.
Oprea, A, Sîrbu, C., Doroftei, M. & Covaliov, S. (2021). New Contributions to the
chorology of some alien plant species in Romania's flora. Acta Horti Bot.
Bucurest., 47, 13-26
Petrova, A.S. (2017). On the identity and distribution of the alien Acalypha species
(Euphorbiaceae) in Bulgaria. Phytologia Balcanica, 23(1), 31-34
Pilsl, P. (2022). Acalypha australis neu für Österreich. Forum Flora Austria.
http://forum.flora-austria.at/viewtopic.php?t=3683&p=21856 (accesed: 28.12.2022)
Poyarkova, A.I. (1974). Acalypha L. In: Komarov, V.L. (ed.), Flora of the USSR. Vol.
14 (pp. 228-229) (translated from Russian, Leningrad: Izdatelˈstvo Akad. Nauk
SSSR, 1949). Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translation.
Prodan, I. (1953). Fam. Euphorbiaceae J. St. Hill. In: Săvulescu, T. (ed.), Flora R.P.
Române. Vol. 2. (pp. 295-373). Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. R. P. Române.
Radcliffe-Smith, A. (1973). Allomorphic female flowers in the genus Acalypha
(Euphorbiaceae). Kew Bull. 28, 525-529.
Radcliffe-Smith, A. (2011). Acalypha L. In: Flora of Pakistan (edit. com.), Tropicos.org.
Missouri Botanical Garden, http://www.tropicos.org/Name/42000236 (accesed:
30.12.2022).
Acalypha rhomboidea in the vascular flora of Romania 47
Rhoads, A.F. & Block, T.A.( 2007). The plants of Pennsylvania. An illustrated manual,
2nd edit.. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
Sagun, V.G., Levin, G.A. & van Welzen, P.C. (2010). Revision and phylogeny of
Acalypha (Euphorbiaceae) in Malesia. Blumea, 55, 21-60.
Sârbu, I., Ştefan, N. & Oprea, A. (2013). Plante vasculare din România. Determinator
ilustrat de teren. Bucureşti: Edit. Victor B Victor, 1317 pp.
Shevera, M.V., Kish, R.Ya. (2018). Acalyphа australis L. (Euphorbiaceae Juss.) - a new
alien species in the flora of Transcarpathia. Biol. Syst., 10(2): 238-241 (in
Ukrainian).
Sîrbu, C. & Șușnia I. (2018). New records in the alien flora of Romania: Euphorbia
serpens and E. glyptosperma. J. Plant Develop., 25, 135-144.
Steinmann, V.W. & Felger, R.S. (1997). The Euphorbiaceae of Sonora, Mexico. Aliso:
J. Syst. Floristic Bot., 16(1), 1-71.
Thellung, A. (1912). La flore adventice de Montpellier. Mem. Soc. Nation. Sci. Nat.
Math., 38, 57-728.
Tutin, T.G. (1968). Acalypha L. In: Tutin, T.G & al. (eds), Flora Europaea. Vol. 2
(pp. 212). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Uludağ, A., Aksoy, N., Yazlık, A., Arslan, Z.F., Yazmış, E., Üremiş, I., Cossu, T.A.,
Groom, Q., Pergl, J., Pyšek, P. & Brundu, G. (2017). Alien flora of Turkey:
checklist, taxonomic composition and ecological attributes. NeoBiota, 35: 61-85.
Verloove, F. (2006). Catalogue of neophytes in Belgium (1800-2005). Scripta Bot.
Belgica, 39, 1-89.
Webster, G.L. (1975). Conspectus of a new classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Taxon,
24(5/6), 593-601.
Webster, G.L. (1994). Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae.
Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 81, 33-144.
Welzen, P.C. van & Chayamarit K. (2020). Flora of Thailand, Euphorbiaceae. Naturalis
Biodiversity Center, Leiden; Forest Herbarium, National Park, Wildlife and
Plant Conservation Department, Bangkok.
Wittenberg, R. (ed.) (2005). An inventory of alien species and their threat to
biodiversity and economy in Switzerland. CABI Bioscience Switzerland Centre
report to the Swiss Agency for Environment, Forests and Landscape.
Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 2023, 49: 49-76
Abstract: In this paper, we provided the first checklist of alien flora of Buzău County
(Romania). Our study revealed the positive invasion trend during recent years. 110 alien
taxa were recorded, who belong to 36 families of vascular plants, 52 of them being
invasive. The Americas, Asia and the Mediterranean area are the main regions of origin of
the taxa of the inventory. Three species are of European Union concern: Ailanthus
altissima, Asclepias syriaca and Elodea nuttallii. The most alien plant species were
recorded for Buzău and Râmnicu-Sărat cities.
Keywords: allogenous plant species, invasive, Buzău, Romania
Introduction
Biological invasions are a global phenomenon and comparison of geographically
distant regions and their introduced biota is a crucial for elucidation of the determinants
of invasiveness and invasibility (Reichard & White 2003; Pyšek et al. 2004).
European researchers (Pyśek et al. 2012) emphasize the research importance of
the regional alien flora for better understanding the invasion process and for the control
and management of alien species (Wu et al. 2008; Baranovski et al. 2016; Spampinato
et al. 2022). Once introduced and established in a new region, invasive plant species are
extremely difficult to eradicate or control (Andreu & Vilà 2010). This suggests an
urgent need for information regarding the presence and degree of spread of alien
species. Datasets on the floristic state, biological attributes, and the geographic
distribution of alien species are significant tools in plant invasions management (Pyšek
et al. 2002, 2004; Haq et al. 2021). Analysis of alien flora composition and dynamics
are essential elements for assessing infestation degree of different taxa (Pyśek 2003).
The goals of this study are to provide an inventory and background information
on alien plants from Buzău County (South-Eastern Romania). Data on the alien plants
from this area are sporadically reported in a few papers (Sîrbu et al. 2011, 2014; Oprea
et al. 2012a, b). This new and updated data should contribute to filling the knowledge
gap on alien species distribution in Romania.
1
University of Bucharest, Botanic Garden “D. Brandza”, Șos. Cotroceni 32, 060114-București, România.
2
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Biology, 1-3 Aleea Portocalelor, Bucharest – 060110, Romania.
3
University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Bucharest, Romania.
4
University of Life Sciences “Ion Ionescu de la Brad”, Iaşi, Romania.
5
University "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" of Iaşi, Botanical Garden "Anastasie Fătu", Iaşi, Romania.
* Correspondence: petronela.camen-comanescu@unibuc.ro
50 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
The total area of the county is 6,102.6 square kilometers (2.6% of the country's
territory) and over 40% of the total area is arable land. The county occupies the largest
part of the hydrographic basin of the Buzău river, harmoniously encompassing all forms
of relief: mountains in the north, plains in the south, between which lies the
subcarpathian hilly area.
The vegetation presents specific elements for each of the three types of relief: the
steppe and silvosteppe type in the plains, forests in Subcarpathian hills and mountain
area and extensive meadows with grasses and bushes in the subalpine area.
In the steppe, vegetation has been replaced over large areas by cultivated plants.
The lands, except for marshes, valleys and salt marshes, are cultivated with cereals,
sunflowers, legumes and, to a lesser extent, with fruit trees and vines.
In the forest-steppe, in addition to the lands occupied by crops, in smaller areas
there are forests, remnants of the forests from the past.
The area of the subcarpathian hills and the mountain area is covered by forests
(oak forest, beech forest, coniferous forest), woody shrub community and subalpine
meadows.
Methods. This study is based on the authors’field investigations from May to
October inbetween 2019 and 2022. The inventory was done in 130 localities of Buzău
County, covering the entire surface of the county. The data were collected from
abandoned lands, railway station, cemeteries, dumping site, roadsides and some rivers,
cultivated lands and protected areas. The collected data were compared with
information about alien species found in previous research about flora from Buzău
County, published in various scientific papers (Ciocârlan 1966, 1968; Dihoru 1975;
Ştefan 1980, 1993; Mititelu et al. 1980; Anastasiu et al. 2008; Sava et al. 2010;
Georgescu et al. 2015).
A database with alien plants from Buzău County has been done. Archaeophytes
(aliens introduced before 1500 AD), neophytes and cryptogenic taxa (taxa for which the
period of introduction is not known or not very well documented) were considered in
the analyses. Senecio inaequidens is not included in analyses, it was discovered in
November 2023, when the paper was in reviewing process.
The nomenclature of species is according to Plants of the World Online database
(POWO 2023) and Sârbu et al. (2013). In the list of alien flora (Appendix 1), taxa were
listed in alphabetic order. For each taxon we registered and analized: family, life span,
life form (according to Sârbu et al. 2013), origin (according to Erhardt et al. 2008,
Sârbu et al. 2013), way of introduction, residence time, invasive status (according to
Anastasiu et al. 2019) and relative abundance (Aymerich & Sáez 2019). The
terminology used to establish the status of alien plants in our country has been adapted
from Richardson et al. (2000) and Pyšek et al. (2004).
Abbreviations: Life form: Ch – Chamaephytae; G – Geophyte; H – Hemicryptophyte;
HH – Helohydrophyte; PhLi – Liana; PhM – Macrophanerophyte; PhN –
Nanophanerophyte; T – Therophyte; Ht – Hemitherophyte. Origin: Af – Africa; Am –
America; As – Asia; Eu – Europe; Trop – Tropical; Med – Mediterranean; N – North; E
– East; S – South; W – West; C – Centre (central). Way of introduction: a – accidental;
d – deliberate. Residence time: arh – archaeophyte; neo – neophyte; cry – cryptogenic
taxa. Invasive status: c = casual; n = naturalized; i = invasive. Relative abundance:
Rare (R): less than 5 points; Scattered (S): few points (typically <20) and locally scarce;
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 51
Locally abundant (L): few points but locally abundant; Common (C): widespread and
often locally abundant.
Results
Abutilon theophrasti Medik.: Băile Sărata-Monteoru (45.10081°N, 26.70158°E);
Buzău (45.14269°N, 26.84434°E).
Acer negundo L.: Aldeni; Băile Sărata-Monteoru; Beciu; Boldu; Buzău (Crâng
Park, Industriei Boulevard, railway station, Transilvaniei Street); Merei; Râmnicelu;
Râmnicu Sărat (Eternitatea Cemetery, railway station); Săhăteni; Sărata-Monteoru;
Valea Părului; Vintilă Vodă.
Aesculus hippocastanum L.: Băile Sărata-Monteoru (45.14951°N, 26.63066°E).
Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle: Băile; Băile Sărata-Monteoru (halt);
Bălăneşti; Beciu; Boldu; Bozioru; Buda Crăciuneşti; Buzău (Alexandru Marghiloman
Street, Colonel Ion Buzoianu Street, Depoului Street, Industriei Boulevard, Panait
Moşoiu Street, railway station, Transilvaniei Street); Cândeşti; Caragele; Cârlomăneşti;
Cilibia; Ciobănoaia; Ciuta; Cocârceni; Colţi; Costeşti; Dogari; Izvoru Dulce; Largu;
Leiculeşti; Lunca; Merei; Ojasca; Oreavu; Pănătău; Pătârlagele; Pietroasele; Pogoanele;
Policiori, Vulcanii Noroioşi Pâclele Mici; Poşta Câlnău; Răduceşti; Râmnicu Sărat
(Eternitatea Cemetery, Drăgaicii Street, railway station); Ruşeţu; Săhăteni; Săpoca;
Săruleşti; Sătuc; Sibiciu de Sus; Soreşti; Topliceni; Valera Părului; Valea Salciei;
Verneşti; Vintilă Vodă; Vipireşti; Zoreşti.
Alcea rosea L.: Buzău (Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery, Sf. Constantin and Elena
Cemetery); Merei (45.134048°N, 26.662441°E); Topliceni (45.426163°N, 27.004843°E).
Amaranthus albus L.: Buzău (Industriei Boulevard); Râmnicu Sărat (railway
station) (45.37920°N, 27.05817°N).
Amaranthus blitum subsp. emarginatus (Salzm. ex Uline & Bray) Carretero,
Munoz Garm. & Pedrol (Amaranthus emarginatus Salzm. ex Uline & Bray): Gura
Teghii (45.486611°N, 26.423478°E).
Amaranthus caudatus L.: Pogoanele (44.916732°N, 26.990855°E).
Amaranthus cruentus L.: Buzău (Saturn Street 45.141449°N, 26.818844°E);
Muceşti-Dănuleşti (45.513161°N, 26.920114°E).
Amaranthus deflexus L.: Buzău (Marghiloman Park, Alexandru Marghiloman
Street, Colonel Ion Buzioanu Street, Ostrovului Street, Panait Moşoiu Street, Poştei
Street); Râmnicu-Sărat (Drăgaicii Street); Săhăteni.
Amaranthus hybridus L.: Muceşti-Dănuleşti (45.513161°N, 26.920114°E);
Policiori (45.357281°N, 26.679632°E); Podu Muncii (45.434185°N, 26.735361°E).
Amaranthus powellii S. Wats.: Buzău (railway station 45.14269°N,
26.84434°E); Merei (45.124985°N, 26.686115°E); Râmnicelu (45.28673°N,
27.05894°E); Râmnicu Sărat (railway station 45.378700°N, 27.059140°E).
Amaranthus retroflexus L.: Băile; Băile Sărata-Monteoru (halt); Balta Tocila;
Beceni; Beciu; Boldu; Buzău (Depoului Street, Industriei Boulevard, railway station,
Saturn Street, Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery; Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery);
Cândeşti; Cârlomăneşti; Cernăteşti; Cilibia; Cioranca; Cislău; Colţi; Deduleşti; Gura
Câlnăului; Gura Teghii; Instriţa de Jos; Joseni; Leiculeşti; Merei; Mierea; Nehoiu;
Niscov; Ojasca; Păltineni; Păltiniş; Pârscov; Pătârlagele; Pietroasele; Podu Muncii;
Pogoanele; Poşta Câlnău; Potoceni; Râmnicelu; Râmnicu Sărat (Eternitatea Cemetery,
52 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
railway station); Sătuc; Scărişoara (cemetery); Sibicu de Sus; Soreşti; Stâlpu; Topliceni;
Valea Nucului; Valea Salciei (cemetery); Valea Sibicului; Verneşti; Zoreşti.
Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.: Aldeni; Băile Sărata-Monteoru (halt); Balta Tocila;
Bălănești; Beceni; Beciu; Boldu; Buda Crăciuneşti; Buzău (Industriei Boulevard, Privat
Cemetery, railway station, Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery); Cândeşti; Chirleşti; Ciuta;
Dogaru; Gura Teghii; Istriţa de Jos; Joseni; Largu; Limpeziş; Lunca Priporului; Măgura;
Merei; Muceşti-Dănuleşti; Oreavu; Pătârlagele; Pogoanele; Poşta Câlnău; Potârnicheşti;
Râmnicelu; Râmnicu Sărat (railway station); Ruşeţu; Sărata; Siriu; Spătaru; Tisău;
Valea Puţului; Valea Salciei (cemetery); Verneşti; Zărneştii de Slănic.
Amorpha fruticosa L.: Buzău (Crâng Park, Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery);
Cheile Buzăului; Joseni; Lacul Siriu; Lunca Jariştea (downstream of the Siriu lake
dam); Sărata; Săruleşti; Valea Lupului; Stânca Teherău (viaduct); Vipereşti.
Antirrhinum majus L.: Buzău (Panait Moşoiu Street 45.136166°N,
26.830355°E, Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery 45.160266°N, 26.785224°E).
Armoracia rusticana G.Gaertn., B.Mey. & Scherb.: Beceni; Beciu; Buzău
(Industriei Boulevard, Dumitru Filipescu Street); Clondiru de Sus; Cozieni; Greceanca;
Izvoru Dulce; Joseni; Măgura; Merei; Muceşti-Dănuleşti; Ojasca; Păltiniş; Pleşcoi;
Poşta; Săruleşti; Topliceni; Valea Salciei; Vipereşti.
Artemisia annua L.: Băile; Beceni; Buzău (Industriei Boulevard); Cernăteşti;
Pătârlagele; Săpoca.
Asclepias syriaca L.: Lunca Priporului (45.448704°N, 26.295744°E); Scărişoara
(cemetery 45.226198°N, 26.389007°E).
Atriplex hortensis L.: Buda (45.501072°N, 26.911335°E); Valea Salciei
(45.497581°N, 26.836414°E).
Avena sativa L.: Râmnicu Sărat (railway station 45.33427°N, 27.05894°E).
Bassia scoparia (L.) A.J.Scott: Băile; Băile Sărata-Monteoru (halt); Boldu;
Brădeanca; Buzău (Depoului Street, Industriei Boulevard, railway station); Cândeşti;
Cilibia; Cislău; Colţi; Colţu Pietrii; Fulga; Gura Câlnăului; Istriţa de Jos; Nehoiu;
Niscov; Păltinerni; Păltiniş; Pătârlagele; Poşta Câinău; Potârnicheşti; Râmnicu Sărat
(railway station); Valea Sibicului; Verneşti; Zărneştii de Slănic.
Bassia scoparia var. trichophylla (Voss) S.L.Welsh: Blăjani; Buzău (Depoului
Street); Potoceni; Siriu; Topliceni; Valea Sibiciului.
Bidens frondosa L.: Pătârlagele (45.32296°N, 26.36352°E).
Brassica rapa L.: Buzău, (railway station 45.14306°N, 26.83059°E); Râmnicu
Sărat (railway station 45.31004°N, 27.05894°E).
Bromus diandrus Roth: Buzău (railway station 45.14268°N, 26.83123°E).
Calendula officinalis L.: Buzău (Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery, Sf. Constantin
and Elena Cemetery); Lunca Jariştei (cemetery); Râmnicu Sărat (Eternitatea Cemetery).
Campsis radicans (L.) Bureau: Buzău (Marghiloman Park 45.14716°N,
26.84534°E); Pădurenii (45.182907°N, 26.541039°E).
Cannabis sativa L.: Băbeni; Bozioru; Buzău (Industriei Boulevard, railway
station); Cârlomăneşti; Cioranca; Greceanca; Potârnicheşti; Topliceni; Verneşti.
Catalpa bignonioides Walter: Buzău (Obor Street 45.155197°N, 26.8242°E).
Coreopsis grandiflora Hogg ex Sweet: Lunca Jariştei (cemetery 45.483505°N,
26.257868°E).
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 53
Cocârceni; Colţi; Costeşti; Cozieni; Dogaru; Fulga; Grăjdana; Gura Câlnăului; Gura
Teghii; Izvoru Dulce; Leiculeşti; Lopătari; Lunca; Mierea; Muceşti-Dănuleşti; Niscov;
Pădureni; Păltineni; Pănătău; Poru Muncii; Pogoanele, Poşta; Poşta Câlnău; Râmnicelu;
Râmnicu Sărat (Drăgaicii Street, Eternitate cemetery, railway station); Ruşeţu; Şarânga;
Scărişoara (cemetery); Sibiciu de Sus; Soreşti; Spătaru, Spătaru forest; Stâlpu; Valea
Părului; Valea Sălciilor; Verneşti.
Erigeron sumatrensis Retz.: Buzău (railway station 45.14290°N, 26.82873°E).
Euphorbia davidii Subils: Buzău (railway station 45.14269°N, 26.84434°E).
Euphorbia glyptosperma Engelm: Râmnicu Sărat (the north part of the locality
45.39778°N, 27.04790°E).
Euphorbia maculata L.: Buzău (Marghiloman Park 45.14716°N, 26.84534°E,
Privat Cemetery 45.159203°N, 26.783609°E, Transilvaniei Street 45.154545°N,
26.819881°E, railway station 45.14269°N, 26.82354°E).
Euphorbia marginata Pursh: Buzău (Panait Moşoiu Street 45.138542°N,
26.832609°E, Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery 45.160266°N, 26.785224°E; Gura
Teghii (cemetery 45,486611°N, 26,423478°E); Topliceni (45.426163°N, 27.004843°E).
Fallopia aubertii (L. Henry) Holub: between Ziduri and Valea Râmnicului
(45.311825°N, 27.067606°E); Buzău (railway station 45.14269°N, 26.82354°E).
Fraxinus americana L.: Buzău (Colonel Ion Buzoianu Street 45.146774°N,
26.819748°E, Ostrovului Street 45.155087°N, 26.818291°E); Oreavul (45.360512°N,
27.012686°E).
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall: Băile; Balta Albă; between Buzău and
Spătaru; between Policiori and Beciu; Boldu; Buzău (Colonel Ion Buzoianu Street,
railway station); Cilibia; Gura Câlnăului; Mânzăleşti; Policiori (Vulcanii Noroioşi
Pâclele Mici); Râmnicelu; Râmnicu Sărat (railway station).
Gaillardia pulchella Foug.: Buzău (Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery, Sf. Constantin
and Elena Cemetery; Râmnicu Sărat, Eternitate Cemetery); Scărişoara (cemetery);
Valea Nucului.
Galinsoga parviflora Cav.: Beciu (45.37589°N, 26.70709°E); Leiculeşti
(45.18245°N, 26.58228°E); Sibiciu de Sus (45.38806°N, 26.35922°E).
Galinsoga quadriradiata Ruiz & Pav.: Bălănești; Bozioru (45.38166°N,
26.491241°E); Gura Teghii (45.494503°N, 26.433077°E); Păltiniş (45.45396°N,
26.37897°E).
Gleditsia triacanthos L.: Aldeni; Băile Sărata-Monteoru (halt); Balta Albă;
Bozioru; Buzău (Crâng Park, railway station, Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery); Istriţa de
Jos; Limpeziş; Oreavu; Pietroasele; Râmnicu Sărat (railway station); Săhăteni;
Scorţoasa; Soreşti; Stâlpu; Valea Părului; Verneşti.
Helianthus annuus L.: Buzău (railway station 45.14269°N, 26.84434°E);
Râmnicu Sărat (railway station 45.378920°N, 27.058140°E).
Helianthus decapetalus L.: between Vipereşti and Cislău (45.228901°N,
26.423611°E); Mărunţişu (45.286018°N, 26.353696°E).
Helianthus tuberosus L.: Berca; between Pârjoleşti and Lunca Frumoasă;
Bozioru; Buda Crăciuneşti; Buzău (Panait Moşoiu Street, Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery,
Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery); Caragele; Cernăteşti; Cocârceni; Cozieni;
Furtuneşti; Gura Dimienii; Haleş; Izvoru Dulce; Leiculeşti; Lopătari; Lunca Frumoasă;
Mânzăleşti; Păltiniş; Pârscov; Pogoanele; Poşta; Răduceşti; Săpoca; Sărata-Monteoru;
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 55
Pătârlagele; Policiori (Vulcanii noroioşi, Pâclele Mici); Râmnicu Sărat (railway station);
Săpoca; Valea Părului.
Morus nigra L.: Buzău (Marghiloman Park); Fluieraşi; Gura Teghii; Mierea;
Nehoiu; Policiori (Vulcanii noroioşi, Pâclele Mici); Râmnicu Sărat (railway station);
Sibiciu de Sus; Spătaru (the edge of the forest).
Nicotiana alata Link & Otto: Băbeni (45.443275°N, 26.979601°E).
Oenothera biennis L.: Cozieni (45.32576°N, 26.495592°E); Băile Sărata-Monteoru
(45.17034°N, 26.6273°E); Grăjdeana (45.21294°N, 26.63668°E); Gura Teghii (45.48396°N,
26.42029°E); Leiculeşti (45.18245°N, 26.58228°E); Merei (45.13065°N, 26.68018°E).
Oenothera glazioviana Micheli: Băbeni; Bâsca Rozilei; Berca; between
Policiori and Beciu; Bozioru; Buda; Buzău (Panait Moşoiu Street, Sf. Apostol Andrei
Cemetery); Cândeşti; Cernăteşti; Colţi; Fulga; Grajdana; Gura Câlnăului; Gura Teghii;
Lunca Jariştea (cemetery); Mărunţişu; Merei; Niscov; Pătârlagele; Pleşcoi; Râmnicu
Sărat (Eternitatea cemetery); Scărişoara (cemetery); Sibiciu de Sus; Siriu (dam);
Strezeni; Valea Salciei (cemetery); Valea Sibicului; Varlaam (cemetery).
Oenothera macrocarpa subsp. macrocarpa (Oenothera missouriensis Sims):
Scărişoara, cemetery (45.226198°N, 26.389007°E); Varlaam, cemetery (45.501062°N,
26.437818°E).
Oxalis corniculata L.: Buzău, Alexandru Marghiloman Street, Marghiloman
Park, Poştei Street; Gura Teghii, cemetery; Râmnicu Sărat, Drăgaicii Street, Eternitatea
Cemetery; Scărişoara, cemetery.
Oxalis dillenii Jacq.: Bălănești; Buzău (Crâng Park 45.1455°N, 26.79624°E,
railway station 45.14288°N, 26.82737°E).
Oxalis stricta L.: Pătârlagele (45.32301°N, 26.36458°E), Râmnicu Sărat
(45.38554°N, 27.055056°E).
Parthenocissus inserta (A. Kern.) Fritsch: Bălăneşti; Buzău (Industriei
Boulevard, Marghiloman Park, Obor Street, Panait Moşoiu Street, railway station, Sf.
Apostol Andrei Cemetery, Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery, the entrance of the city);
Costeşti; Dogari; Fulga; Gura Dimienii; Gura Teghii; Băile Sărata-Monteoru (halt);
Izvoru Dulce; Luciu; Lunca Priporului; Măgura; Manasia; Merei; Mierea; Nehoiu;
Păltiniş; Pârscov; Pătârlagele; Pogoanele; Râmnicu Sărat (Eternitatea cemetery,
Drăgaicii Street, railway station); Ruşeţu; Săhăteni; Săruleşti; Valea Sibiciului; Verneşti.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch.: Pogoanele (44.916732°N, 26.990855°E).
Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Siebold & Zucc.) Planch.: Buzău (Obor Street
45.155197°N, 26.8242°E).
Paulownia tomentosa (Thunb.) Steud.: Râmnicu Sărat (railway station
45.33427°N, 27.05894°E).
Persicaria orientalis (L.) Spach: Mărăcineni (45.175751°N, 26.823992°E).
Petrosedum ochroleucum (Chaix) Nierderle: Buzău (railway station, Sf.
Apostol Andrei Cemetery, Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery); Gura Teghii
(cemetery); Râmnicu Sărat (Eternitatea Cemetery).
Petunia integrifolia (Hooker) Schinz & Thell.: Buzău (Alexandru
Marghiloman Street 45.14677°N, 26.839054°E, Depoului Street 45.141178°N,
26.836353°E, Saturn Street 45.141449°N, 26.818844°E); Potârnicheşti (45.221481°N,
26.862766°E).
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 57
Phedimus spurium (M. Bieb.) `t Hart: Buzău (Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery
45.158981°N, 26.788837°E, Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery 45.160266°N,
26.785224°E); Gura Teghii (cemetery 45.486611°N, 26.423478°E); Râmnicu Sărat
(Eternitatea Cemetery 45.385834°N, 27.055744°E)
Phytolacca americana L.: Atârnaţi; Buzău (Sf. Apostol Andrei Cemetery);
Clondiru de Sus, Greceanca; Măteşti; Scărişoara (cemetery); Stâlpu.
Populus deltoides subsp. deltoides (Populus carolinensis Moench): Râmnicu
Sărat (railway station 45.33427°N, 27.05894°E).
Portulaca oleracea L.: Buzău (Alexandru Marghiloman Street 45.14677°N,
26.839054°E, Industriei Boulevard 45.133793°N, 26.822111°E, railway station
45.142637°N, 26.826056°E).
Prunus cerasifera Ehrh.: Băile; Băile Sarata Monteoru (halt); Bălănești;
Bâlhacu; Balta Albă; Bâsca Rozilei; Beciu; Bentu; between Buzău and Spătaru;
between Policiori and Beciu; Boldu; Buzău (Alexandru Marghiloman Street, Crâng
Park, Industriei Boulevard, Marghiloman Park); Cândeşti; Chirleşti; Cilibia; Colţi;
Colţu Petrii; Costeşti; Furtuneşti; Gălbinaşi; Grăjdana; Gura Bâscei; Joseni; Leiculeşti;
Lunca; Lunca Proporului; Măgura; Mărunţişu; Mierea; Nehoiu; Nemertea; Niscov,
Păltineni; Păltiniş; Pănătău; Pătârlagele; Poienile; Policiori; Râmnicelu; Râmnicu Sărat
(railway station); Sătuc; Scorţoasa; Sibiciu de Sus; Spătaru; Stâlpu; Valea Sibiciului.
Prunus cerasus (Mill.) A.Gray: Băile; Băile Sărata-Monteoru; Beciu; Berca;
Buzău (railway station); Cândeşti; Chirleşti; Cilibia; Cislău; Gura Bâscei; Gura Teghii;
Joseni; Leiculeşti; Măgura; Mânzu; Mărunţişu; Merei; Niscov; Ojasca; Pătârlagele;
Poienile; Scorţoasa; Sibiciul de Sus; Valea Lupului; Valea Sălciilor.
Reynoutria × bohemica Chetek & Chrtková: Gura Teghii (45.487411°N,
26.425549°E); Furtuneşti (45.45802°N, 26.3944°E); Păltiniş (45.45595°N, 26.37442°E).
Reynoutria japonica Houtt.: Aldeni; Aluniş; Balta Tocila; Bâsca Rozilei;
Beceni; Beciu; Buzău (Sf. Constantin and Elena Cemetery); Gura Dimienii; Leiculeşti;
Manasia; Nehoiaşu; Siriu; Varlaam.
Rhus typhina L.: Buzău (Depoului Street); Ciuta; Fulga; Grăjdana; Izvoru
Dulce; Joseni; Leiculeşti; Niscov; Pietroasele; Râmnicu Sărat; Săpoca; Săruleşti; Sătuc;
Valea Părului; Varlaam; Vipereşti.
Robinia pseudoacacia L.: Aldeni; Băile; Băile Sărata-Monteoru; Bălăneşti;
Bâlhacu; Balta Albă; Bâsca Rozilei; Beciu (Vulcanii Noroioşi); Bentu; between
Policiori and Beciu; Berca; Blăjani; Boldu; Bozioru; Buda; Buzău (Sf. Apostol Andrei
Cemetery, the entrance of the city, railway station); Cândeşti; Caragele; Chirleşti;
Cilibia; Ciobănoaia; Cislău; Ciuta; Cocârceni; Colţi; Colţu Pietrii; Costeşti; Deduleşti;
Fluieraşi; Furtuneşti; Gălbinaşi; Grăjdana; Greceanca; Gura Bâscei; Gura Siriului; Gura
Teghii; Izvoru Dulce; Joseni; Leiculeşti; Limpeziş; Lunca; Lunca Jariştea (downstream
of the Siriu lake dam); Lunca Priporului; Măgura; Mânzu; Mărgăriţi; Mărunţişu; Merei;
Mierea; Nehoiu; Nemertea; Niscov; Ojasca; Oreavu; Păltineni; Păltiniş; Pătârlagele;
Pogoanele; Poienile; Policiori (Vulcanii noroioşi, Pâclele Mici); Răduceşti; Râmnicelu;
Râmnicu Sărat (railway station); Săhăteni; Săpoca; Sărata; Sărata-Monteoru; Sătuc;
Scărişoara (cemetery); Sibiciu de Sus; Soreşti; Stâlpu; Stânca Teherău (viaduct); Valea
Lupului; Valea Salciei; Valea Sălciilor; Valea Sibiciului; Varlaam (cemetery); Vintilă
Vodă; Vipireşti; Vizireni; Zoreşti.
58 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
The analysis of life span shows a close proportion between annuals – 53 species
(48.62%) and perennials – 52 species (47.27%). Biennals are represented by 2 species
(2.46%). Among the identified taxa there are also 3 annual species with a tendency to
perennialize: Antirrhinum majus, Oxalis dillenii and Oxalis stricta.
Although the dominance of annuals is a trend observed in numerous research of
regional flora in the country and abroad (Lambdon et al. 2008; Baranovski et al. 2016;
Burdușel et al. 2020; Răduțoiu & Stan 2013), in this case the presence of a large
number of perennial species is given by the large number of species of introduced for
ornamental purposes. Thus, among the 28 phanerophytes, 23 species are ornamental.
As ornamental trees and shrubs we can list Ailanthus altissima, Catalpa
bignonioides, Fraxinus americana, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Koelreuteria paniculata,
Paulownia tomentosa, Rhus typhina and Robinia viscosa.
Among the 20 perennials hemicryptophytes (Fig. 2), also a high number (16
species) are ornamental and were observed especially in the studied cemeteries. Among
these we mention Asclepias syriaca, Coreopsis lanceolata, Gaillardia pulchella,
Hemerocallis fulva, Lupinus polyphyllus, Rudbeckia hirta.
Perennial hydrophytes are represented by two species: Elodea nuttalii and
Elodea canadensis, invasive plants recorded in a water basin in “Crâng” Park from
Buzău town. The species was probably introduced together with exotic ornamental
water lily species.
The geophytes and chamaephytes have just one representative.
As annual species there are some weeds associated with roadsides or cultivated
land, especially considering that of the total area of the county, over 40% is arable land
(Amaranthus spp., Datura stramonium, Erigeron annuus, Portulaca oleracea, Xanthium
orientale subsp. italicum, Xanthium spinosum).
Sources of annuals are also railway platforms and waste lands associated to the
railways. We mention from here Erigeron sumatrensis, Euphorbia davidii, Lepidium
densiflorum, Lepidium oblongum, some of them found in the county just in Buzău train station.
The greatest contribution to the regional alien flora was made by species
originating from the Americas (67 taxa, 60.90%), among which most originate from
North America (57 taxa) (Fig. 3). The next most frequent areas of origin are: Asia
(26 taxa) and the Mediterranean basin (6 taxa). Three taxa are from South- East Europe
and West Asia. African taxa have just 2 representatives.
Of the total alien taxa, the majority is represented by neophytes (97 taxa –
88.18%) (Appendix 1) and only 9.09%, is represented by archaeophytes. Only two
cryptogenic taxa were found (Abutilon theophrasti, Armoracia rusticana).
Considering the way of introductions, 74 taxa (67.88%) from total taxa were
introduced deliberately and 36 (32.72%) accidentally.
Regarding the introduction pathways of alien flora, ornamental and alimentary
use results to be the main causes of introduction. 56 taxa were introduced as ornamental
plants, horticulture being a major factor of continuous increase in the number of alien
taxa. These represent 21.21% of the total of alien species introduced (264 taxa) for
ornamental purposes in Romania (Urziceanu et al. 2020).
Cemeteries were the main places where some of them were identified: Asclepias
syriaca, Calendula officinalis, Coreopsis lanceolata, Gaillardia pulchella, Hemerocallis
fulva, Lupinus polyphyllus, Oenothera macrocarpa subsp. macrocarpa, Rudbeckia
hirta, Petrosedum ochroleucum, Phedimus spurius, Tagetes erecta. As well, the
presence of a large number of alien plants (37 species) in these places proves that they
are hotspots of potentially invasive plants species.
Regarding the degree of naturalization, almost half of the taxa are invasive (53),
40 are casual aliens and 17 are naturalised. The established aliens (naturalised +
invasive) are 70 (63.63%) of the recorded taxa.
Of this, Ailanthus altissima, Asclepias syriaca and Elodea nuttallii are included
in the updated list of invasive alien species of EU concern (The European Commission
2019). The first species is widely spread over the surface of the county, but the other
two species were identified in one or two localities. The number of Asclepias syriaca
individuals is very low but in case of Elodea nuttallii we mention a very large number
of individuals in the lake in “Crâng” Park, where the water surface of the lake was
invaded.
Fig. 4. The degree of naturalization of alien plant species from Buzău County
Also, from the invasive taxa, 47 are included in the list of the 150 most
widespread alien plant species in Europe (Lambdon et al. 2008).
Analysis of relative abundance of alien plant species from Buzău County show
that species with rare status (53) have the highest presence and were identified in less
than 5 points where the inventory was made. Of these, 24 species are casual, 17 invasive
and 12 naturalized. This shows that a large part of the total alien species registered
(53 species) are in the initial stage of spreading in this county.
27 taxa are common species, having a wide regional distribution and a large
number of individuals). Most of these are invasive plants, widely spread throughout the
country as Ailanthus altissima, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Datura stramonium, Erigeron
annuus, Erigeron canadensis and Helianthus tuberosus.
18 taxa are considered scattered (because were identified in less than 20 points
and are locally scarce), casual species predominating: Alcea rosea, Calendula
officinalis, Petrosedum ochroleucum, Phedimus spurius, Tagetes erecta. These species
are decorative plants present especially in the studied cemeteries. Interesting is the weak
presence of the invasive species Solidago canadensis and Artemisia annua.
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 63
Just 12 taxa are locally abundant (restricted to a few places), mostly in railways
stations and cemeteries, important points for introduction of alien species.
Overall, taxa that have achieved a major implantation in the territory (common +
locally abundant) are 28.39% from total taxa and those that show little colonization
success (rare + scarce) are 70.37 %.
The inventory was made in 130 localities of Buzău County, the greatest number
of alien species being registered in the largest cities of the county, Buzău (77 taxa) and
Râmnicu Sărat (48).
Conclusions
The result of the studies indicates an active invasion of alien plants into the flora
of Buzău County with a dominance of neophytes (97 taxa – 88.18%) and 47 taxa
included in the list of the 150 most widespread alien plant species in Europe. Also, 3
taxa (Ailanthus altissima, Asclepias syriaca and Elodea nuttallii) are included in the
updated list of invasive alien species of EU concern.
Of the 110 reported taxa, 57 taxa have the first report for Buzău County. Most of
the new taxa inventoried in this county are represented by plants that have escaped from
cultivation in cemeteries, confirming the important role of horticulture in the
introduction of alien plants, some of them with invasive potential.
References
Anastasiu, P. (2010). Contributions to chorological data on Romanian flora. Acta Horti
Bot. Bucurest., 37, 45-50.
Anastasiu, P., Pascale, G., & Cristurean, I. (2008). Regarding grasslands between
Sārāţelului valley and Slānicului valley, Buzău County. Analele Universității Din
Craiova, Facultatea de Horticultură Craiova, Ser. Agricult., Montanologie,
Cadastru, 38/B, 22–31.
Anastasiu, P., Sîrbu, C., Urziceanu, M., Camen-Comănescu, P., Oprea, A., Nagodă, E.,
Gavrilidis, A.-A., Miu, I., Memedemin, D., Sîrbu, I., & Manta, N. (2019). Ghid
de inventariere şi cartare a distribuţiei speciilor de plante alogene invazive şi
potenţial invazive din România. Bucureşti: Ministerul Mediului, Apelor şi
Pădurilor & Universitatea din Bucureşti.
Andreu, J., & Vilà, M. (2010). Risk analysis of potential invasive plants in Spain.
Journal for Nature Conservation, 18(1), 34-44.
Aymerich, P., & Sáez, L. (2019). Checklist of the vascular alien flora of Catalonia
(northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Spain). Mediterranean Botany, 40(2), 215-242.
Baranovski, B., Khromykh, N., Karmyzova, L., Ivanko, I., & Lykholat, Y. (2016).
Analysis of the alien flora of Dnipropetrovsk Province. Ukrainian Journal of
Ecology, 6(3), 419-429.
Borza, A. (1947). Conspectus Florae Romaniae, Regionumque affinium. Cluj-Napoca:
Edit. Cartea Românească.
Brândză, D. (1879-1883). Prodromul Florei Române. Bucureşti: Tipogr. Acad. Române.
64 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
Burdușel, M., Anastasiu, P. & Șesan, T.E. (2020). Preliminary study on the alien flora
of the Olteţ River Basin (Romania). Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest., 46, 107-132.
Ciocârlan, V. (1966). Contribuţii floristice asupra Slănicului de Buzău. Stud. Cerc. Biol.
Ser. Bot., 18(2), 119-123.
Ciocârlan, V. (1968). Flora şi vegetaţia bazinului subcarpatic al Slănicului de Buzău.
Teză doctorat. Univ. din Bucureşti.
Ciocârlan, V. (1992). Completări la flora României. Stud. Cerc. Biol., Ser. Biol. veg.,
44(2), 109-113.2
Consiliul Județean Buzău. (2023). Prezentarea județului. Retrieved 15 September 2023,
from https://cjbuzau.ro/prezentare-economica/
Costea, M. (1998). Cercetări monografice asupra genului Amaranthus L. din România.
Teză doctorat. Univ. din Bucureşti.
Dihoru, G. (1975). Învelişul vegetal din muntele Siriu. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. R. S.
România.
Dihoru, G. (2015). Tracheoflora județului Buzău. București: Ars Docendi.
Dihoru, G. & Negrean, G. (2009). Cartea roşie a plantelor vasculare din România.
Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. Române.
Doltu, M. I., Popescu, A., Sanda, V., Nedelcu, G.A. (1984). Analiza cormofitelor din
Câmpia Munteniei. Stud. Com., Muz. Şti. Nat. Brukenthal, Sibiu. 26, 49-124.
Erhardt, W., Götz, E., Bödeker, N. & Seybold, S. (2008). Der grosse Zander
Enzyklöpedie der Pflanzennamen. Band 2. Arten und Sorten Stuttgart (Hohenheim).
Georgescu, M.I., Mușat, M., Radu, A.T., Săvulescu, E., & Dobrescu, E. (2015). Flora
aspects in the Slănicul de Buzău watershed. Scientific Papers-Series A,
Agronomy, 58, 381-387.
Grecescu, D. (1898). Conspectul florei României. Bucureşti: Tipogr. Dreptatea.
Haq, S.M., Hamid, M., Lone, F.A. & Singh, B. (2021) Himalayan hotspot with Alien
Weeds: a case study of biological spectrum, phenology, and diversity of weedy
plants of high-altitude mountains in District Kupwara of J&K Himalaya, India.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B. Biol. Sci. 91, 139–152.
Kanitz, A. (1879-1881). Plantas Romaniae hucusque cognitas. Claudiopoli: Apud E.
Demjén..
Lambdon, P., Pyšek, P., Basnou, C., Hejda, M., Arianoutsou, M., Essl, F., ... & Vilà, M.
(2008). Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical
patterns and research needs. Preslia, 80, 101–149
Mititelu, D., Barabaş, N. & Ştefan, N. (1987). Contribuţii la corologia unor plante rare
în Moldova şi Muntenia. Analele Şti. Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, secţ. II, a. Biol.,
33, 20-24.
Mititelu, D., Ștefan, N. & Ciupercă, G. (1980). Flora și vegetația rezervației “Pîclele” cu
vulcani noroioși (jud. Buzău). Stud. Comunic. Muz. Şti. Nat. Bacău /1979-1980/,
99-120.
Oprea, A. (2005). Lista critică a plantelor vasculare din România. Iaşi: Edit. Univ.
“Al. I. Cuza”.
Oprea, A., Sîrbu, C., Eliáš, P. jun. & Ferus, P. (2012). New data addition to the
Romanian alien flora. J. Plant Develop., 19, 141-156
Oprea, A., Barina, Z. & Sîrbu, C. (2012a). Euphorbia davidii Subils (Euphorbiaceae)-an
alien species new to the Romanian flora. Contribuții Botanice, 47, 7-12.
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 65
Oprea, A., Sîrbu, C., Eliáš, P. J. & Ferus, P. (2012b). New data addition to the
Romanian alien flora. Journal of Plant Development, 19, 141-156.
POWO (2023). Plants of the World Online. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens,
Kew. Retrieved 28 May-28 September 2023, from http://www.plantsoft
heworldonline.org/
Pyśek, P. (2003). How reliable are data on alien species in Flora Europea? Flora, 198,
499–507
Pyśek, P., Danihelka, J., Sadlo, J., Chrtek, J.J., Chytry, M., Jarosik, V., Kaplan, Z.,
Krahulec, F., Moravkova, L., Pergl, J., Stajerova, K. & Tichy, L. (2012).
Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update,
taxonomac diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia, 84, 155–255.
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D. M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G. L., Williamson, M. &
Kirschner, J. (2004). Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better
communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon, 53(1), 131-143.
Pyšek, P., Sádlo, J. & Mandák, B. (2002). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech
Republic. Preslia, 74(2), 97-186.
Răduţoiu, D. & Stan, I. (2013). Preliminary Data on Alien Flora from Oltenia–Romania
Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest., 40(1), 33-42.
Reichard, S.H. & White, P.S. (2003). Invasion biology: an emerging field of study.
Annales of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 90, 64–66.
Richardson, D. M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M. G., Panetta, F. D. & West, C.
J. (2000). Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions.
Diversity and distributions, 6(2), 93-107.
Sârbu, I., Ştefan, N. & Oprea, A. (2013). Plante Vasculare din România. Bucureşti.
Editura Victor B Victor.
Sava, D., Arcuș, M. & Doroftei, E. (2010). Preliminary data on Meledic - Mânzălești
natural reserve (Buzău County, Romania). Annals of Nat. Sci. Ovidius Univ., ser.
Biol.- Ecol., 14, 61-66.
Sîrbu, C., Adrian, O. & Peter, F. (2011). New contribution to the study of alien flora in
Romania. Journal of Plant Development, 18, 121-134.
Sîrbu, C. & Oprea, A. (2011). Plante adventive în flora României. Iaşi: Edit. Ion
Ionescu de la Brad.
Sîrbu, C., Oprea, A., Patriche, C. V., Samuil, C. & Vintu, V. (2014). Alien species of
Lepidium in the Flora of Romania: Invasion history and habitat preference.
Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 42(1), 239-247.
Spampinato, G., Laface, V. L. A., Posillipo, G., Cano Ortiz, A., Quinto Canas, R. &
Musarella, C. M. (2022). Alien flora in Calabria (Southern Italy): an updated
checklist. Biological Invasions, 24(8), 2323-2334.
Ştefan, N. (1980). Cercetarea florei şi vegetaţiei din bazinul superior şi mijlociu al
râului Râmnicu Sărat. Teză doctorat, Univ. Iaşi.
Ştefan, N., Mititelu, D. (1980). Contribution chorologique pour la flore de la Roumanie.
Analele Şti. Univ. “Al.I. Cuza” Iaşi, sect. II, a. Biol., 26, 14-16.
Ştefan, N. (1993). Asociaţii vegetale caracteristice terenurilor erodate din zonele de
curbură a Subcarpaţilor. Bul. Grăd. Bot. Iaşi, 4, 115-126
The European Comission (2019). Commission Implementing Regulation (EU)
2019/1262 of 25 July 2019 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141
66 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
to update the list of invasive alien species of Union concern. Official Journal of
the European Union, L 199/1, 25 July 2019.
Urziceanu, M., Camen-Comănescu, P., Nagodă, E., Raicu, M., Sîrbu, I.M. & Anastasiu,
P. (2020). Updated list of non-native ornamental plants in Romania. Contribuții
Botanice, (55), 59-82.
Wu, T., Li, J., Dai, J. & Wang, R. (2008). Floristic analysis and distribution pattern of
alien plants in Shandong Province, eastern China. Frontiers of Forestry in
China, 3(2), 219-225.
Săvulescu, T. (ed.) (1952-1976). Flora R. P. Române - R. S. România, I-XIII. Bucureşti:
Edit. Acad. R. P. Române (R. S. România).
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 67
68 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 69
70 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 71
72 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 73
74 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
Alien Flora from Buzău County – Romania 75
76 CAMEN-COMĂNESCU P., MIHAI D.C., RAICU M., SÎRBU C., OPREA A., ANASTASIU P.
Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 2023, 49: 77-109
Abstract: Giurgiu County, a crucial hub in the Pan-European Corridor with the sole
Danube bridge to Bulgaria, plays an important role in potential pathways for introducing
alien plant species. However, the information regarding the distribution of alien plants in
this county is incomplete. Our study aims to address this gap by providing a
comprehensive analysis of the current distribution of alien plant species based on field
records collected from September 2019 to November 2022. Following the guidelines of
the POIM/178/4/1/120008 project, data were collected across diverse habitats. Our
findings reveal 89 alien plant taxa, including 58 newly reported at the county level. Over
half of the alien plant species (66.29%) are also present in the natural protected areas. The
study contributes essential information for biodiversity conservation, emphasizing
ongoing monitoring and invasive species management within Giurgiu County's protected
areas.
Keywords: invasive species, field record, Prevention and Management Project, Romania
Introduction
Biological invasions, recognized as the second-largest threat to populations,
communities, and ecosystems, have become a critical concern across diverse fields,
ranging from biological systematics to the conservation of natural, semi-natural, and
human-made ecosystems (Aneva et al. 2018). This significant risk is underscored by the
rapid, uncontrolled spread of alien invasive plant species, which endangers various
habitat types (Barudanović et al. 2021).
Many studies suggest that habitats play a crucial role in determining the extent of
invasion by alien species (Chytrý et al. 2008). Understanding biological invasions and
their predictability requires considering the role of habitats, especially as ongoing global
changes are likely to alter patterns of habitat availability, potentially facilitating future
invasions in certain habitats (Lodge 1993; Rounsevell et al. 2006; Pyšek et al. 2010).
At a local scale, habitats become more prone to plant invasions when endowed
with available resources, as observed in urban, cultivated, and riparian habitats that
often exhibit the highest concentrations of alien plant species. These habitats face
substantial local invasions marked by frequent disturbances and distinct resource pulses,
particularly nutrients (Davis et al. 2000; Chytrý et al. 2008; Pyšek et al. 2010).
In the European context, anthropogenic habitats, such as industrial and
agricultural areas, alongside other significantly disturbed habitats like forested areas and
1
University of Bucharest, Botanic Garden “D. Brandza”, Șos. Cotroceni 32, 060114, Bucharest, Romania;
2
University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Carol Davila”, Faculty of Pharmacy, 020956, Bucharest, Romania;
3
University of Bucharest, Faculty of Biology, 1‑3 Intr. Portocalelor, 060101, Bucharest, Romania;
4
University of Bucharest, Research Institute of University of Bucharest (ICUB), 300645, Bucharest, Romania.
Correspondence: eugenia.nagoda@bio.unibuc.ro.
78 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
semi-natural habitats, host the largest share of alien and invasive plants (Pyšek et al.
2009; Nikolić et al. 2013). In areas with intensive human influence, invasive plants can
be found almost everywhere, colonizing cultivated areas, industrial, ruderal, and other
disturbed habitats known for their susceptibility to alien plant colonization (Lambdon et
al. 2008; Vukovic et al. 2010; Silva & Smith 2006).
A considerable proportion of recorded introductions and naturalization in the last
two decades is attributed to the larger movement of people, goods, and services
associated with rapid tourism development in the area. This increased human activity
could support both unintentional and deliberate introductions, emphasizing the complex
relationship between human influence, habitat disturbance, and the spread of invasive
species (Hulme 2007).
Giurgiu County, bordered by Bulgaria and situated north of the Danube in
Muntenia, is a crucial hub for floristic studies. Various watercourses, such as the Danube,
Argeș, and Neajlov, along with numerous protected areas, collectively contribute to the
region's distinctive biodiversity. As the county seat, its strategic location along major
transportation routes like Bucharest-Sofia-Athens and Bucharest-Istanbul establishes it
as a key border crossing point for goods and people. Also, recognized as an important
Danube port, Giurgiu is a key element in the Danube-Rhine Canal-Main Danube
transport corridor, linking it to nine countries, the Black Sea, and the North Sea
(RomaniaDateGeografice.net, n.d.). As a crucial point along the pan-European railway
network and with the sole Danube bridge to Bulgaria, Giurgiu's strategic connectivity
underscores its significance in potential pathways for introducing invasive plant species
(South Muntenia Regional Development Agency, n.d.).
However, the distribution data of alien plants in Giurgiu County are not
homogeneous, reflecting an incomplete mapping of its flora. Chorological data on alien
plant species in Giurgiu County, previously also recognized as Vlașca County, remain
partial and scattered across various papers published over time (Brândză 1879-1883;
Grecescu 1898, 1909; Panţu 1909-1912; Morariu 1946; Borza 1966, 1968; Nedelcu
1967; Popescu 1971; Tarnavschi et al. 1974; Doltu et al. 1984; Nedelcu et al. 1991;
Costea 1998; Paucă-Comănescu et al. 2001; Oprea et al. 2004; Ianovici 2011;
Dumitrașcu et al. 2011; Negrean 2011; Sîrbu & Oprea 2011 etc.).
Our study aims to bridge this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of the
current distribution of alien plant species in Giurgiu County based on our field records.
This effort seeks to enrich our understanding of the alien and invasive flora in Giurgiu
County, filling in data gaps at the national level, particularly in the southern part of the
country, from the Muntenia region. The results are intended to offer a reliable local and
regional analysis for strategic planning related to the management of invasive plants and
biodiversity conservation, aligning with Regulation (EU) No. 1143/2014 of the
European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention and management of the
introduction and spread of invasive alien species.
plains. The region features terraces and meadows along the Danube, Argeș, and Neajlov
Rivers, with the Danube meadow showcasing unique characteristics (RomaniaDate
Geografice.net, n.d).
The county experiences a temperate-continental climate and has a hydrographic
network primarily consisting of the lower sections of the Danube and the Argeș River.
Natural lakes are scarce, with Comana being notable.
Giurgiu County is part of the silvosteppe vegetation zone, with small, degraded
grasslands and clusters of forests (RomaniaDateGeografice.net, n.d). The county
encompasses various protected areas (Fig. 1), including the Oloaga Forest – Grădinari
Nature Reserve (RONPA0435), Comana Natural Park (RONPA0928), and four Sites of
Community Importance (SCI) – Comana (ROSCI0043), Gura Vedei – Șaica – Slobozia
(ROSCI0088), Middle Argeș Floodplain (ROSCI0106), Bolintin Forest (ROSCI0138)
Positioned on the border between the forest-steppe and the steppe, these areas exhibits
distinctive phytocenological features and impressive floristic diversity (Management
Plan of Comana Natural Park, 2018).
Data collection and analysis. The authors acquired the data for this study
through periodic field inventories carried out from September 2019 to November 2022,
encompassing both summer and autumn seasons. The methodology adhered to the
guidelines outlined by the POIM/178/4/1/120008 project: “Adequate management of
invasive species in Romania in accordance with EU Regulation 1143/2014 regarding
the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien
species”.
Our data collection encompassed diverse natural and anthropogenic habitats,
including roadsides, railway embankments, cemeteries, vacant areas, watercourses,
grasslands, cultivated land, abandoned arable land, and backyards. These routes are
illustrated in Fig. 1, where, for an overview, we also included the points from the
literature that we approximated, as they did not clearly specify coordinates or locations
but only at the locality level.
For each route traversed within these habitat types, we completed a field sheet
that included GPS coordinates, locality, population size of the species, phenophase, and
abundance (where applicable).
Regarding population size, a five-step scale was utilized, as follows: 1 (1-10
individuals); 2 (11-50 individuals); 3 (51-100 individuals); 4 (101-500 individuals);
5 (over 500 individuals).
To streamline the information in this study, we provide details on the localities
where alien plant species were observed, including habitat types and population sizes,
with occasional inclusion of coordinates. For additional details, it is noted that such
information can be requested from the authors or the POIM project manager.
For a compresiveh overview, we've integrated our findings with prior reports on
alien plants in Giurgiu County from the literature. Detailed information can be found in
Appendix 1, where we note the initial reports, and, when no previous records exist, we
note our findings as new reported. Additionally, Appendix 2 lists all taxa mentioned in
the literature for Giurgiu County, with an asterisk and gray marking indicating species
found by us in the field.
80 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Results
As a result of our conducted research, we hereby present the identified alien
plant species within the territory of Giurgiu County:
Abutilon theophrasti Medik.: Băneasa, Colibași, Comana (CNP), Comasca,
Falaștoaca (CNP), Frătești, Ghimpați, Giurgiu (near the railway, port area), Gostinu,
Malu Spart, Oinacu, Oncești, Popești, Prundu, Puieni (CNP), Vlad Țepeș (CNP)
Habitats: various habitat types (road edges, railway embankments, riverbanks etc.).
Population size: 1 to 3 on the scale.
Acer negundo L.: Adunații-Copăceni, Braniștea (CNP), Călugăreni (CNP),
Comana, Crevedia Mare, Daia, DJ101A, on the shore of Argeș River (between Stoenești
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 81
and Găiseni), DN5, on the side of the road (between Uzunu and Plopșoru), Giurgiu (on
the side of some streets: Gloriei Street, Bălănoaiei Street; Central square area, Plantelor
Canal, Bizetz Bridge, Port Road, port area, Groapa cu Cenușa Lake and surroundings, at
the foot of the bridge over the Danube towards Ruse, in the train station area), Hotarele,
Letca Nouă, Malu Spart, on the shore of Argeș River, Mihai Bravu (CNP, in the train
station area), Mihăilești, Mogoșești, Oncești, Palanca, Plopșoru, Podu Popa Nae,
Remuș, Stâlpu, Stoenești, on the shore of Sabar River, Uzunu (CNP), Vadu Lat, Valea
Plopilor, Vlad Țepeș (CNP), Vînătorii Mici. Habitats: various habitat types (road edges,
railway embankments, riverbanks etc.). Population size: 1 to 3 on the scale.
Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle: Adunații-Copăceni, Bâcu, Bălănoaia,
Braniștea (CNP), Călugăreni (CNP, in the area of the bridge over Neajlov River, the
market, the edge of the road, and the forest), Colibași, Comasca (in the forest on the
edge of the Danube River), Comana (CNP), Cosoba, Crucea de Piatră (CNP, the side of
the road, on the sloping embankment of the road), Daia, DJ101A, between Stoenești and
Găiseni on the shore of Argeș, Frasinu, Frătești, Giurgiu (Groapa de Cenușă Lake, port
area, train station area, Central Square area, Plantelor Canal, Bizetz Bridge, Port Road,
Bălanoaiei Street, Drumul Fermei Street), DN5 between Uzunu and Plopșoru, Greaca,
Gostinu, Hotarele, Izvoarele, Letca Nouă, Malu Spart, Mihăilești, Mogoșești, Obedeni,
Oinacu, Pietrele, Săbăreni, Schitu, Tântava, Uzunu, Vadu Lat, Valea Bujorului, Valea
Dragului, Valea Plopilor, Vlașin. Population size: 1 to 5 on the scale. The largest
populations (4-5) are found on road edges. Other habitat types include waterbanks,
meadow habitats, forested areas, and others.
Albizia julibrissin Durazz.: Colibași, Comana (44.173843°N, 26.133209°E, in
CNP, the landscaped area of the Adventure Park, near the Dorințeler footbridge),
Frătești (43.977312°N, 25.963323°E, edge of the cemetery), Plopșoru. Habitats:
cemeteries, roadside edges, and lawns. Population size: 1 on the scale.
Amaranthus albus L.: Colibași, Comana (CNP), Crivina, Frătești, Ghizdaru,
Giurgiu (Port Road, Gloria Street), Mihai Bravu (CNP, in the train station area), Oncești
(train station). Habitats: roadside edges, lawns, garbage deposits, railway tracks, and
riverbanks. Population size: 1 - 2 on the scale.
Amaranthus blitum L.: Giurgiu (43.869686°N, 25.964479°E, the abandoned
railway near the port), Slobozia (43.840363°N, 25.896361°E, in the ruderal area on the
banks of an irrigation canal). The population size is 1 on the scale.
Amaranthus cruentus L.: Bolintin-Vale, Crivina, Cosoba, Stâlpu (44.268832°N,
25.851715°E, the space between the road and the fences of the houses) with a
population size is 1 on the scale.
Amaranthus deflexus L.: Călugăreni (CNP), Malu Spart, in the area of the
bridge over the Argeș River, Pietrișu, Săbăreni, Vedea. Habitats: roadside edges and
riverbanks. Population size: 1 to 3 on the scale.
Amaranthus hybridus L.: Bălanu, Crucea de Piatră (CNP), Mihai Bravu (CNP,
in the train station), Valea Bujorului, Vieru (43.93333°N, 25.870066°E). Habitats:
roadside edges, railway tracks, and riverbanks. Population size: 2 on the scale.
Amaranthus palmeri S.Watson: Giurgiu (43.865925°N, 25.956667°E, in the
port area), Oncești (43.942884°N, 25.893861°E, Oncești train station), Izvoarele, Valea
Dragului, Valea Bujorului. Habitats: roadside edges and vacant lots. Population size 1 -
2 on the scale.
82 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Oenothera biennis L.: Ghimpați, Grădiștea, Malu Spart, Remuș, Vadu Lat.
Habitats: roadside, green spaces in front of residential areas. Population size: 1 on
the scale.
Oenothera glazioviana Micheli: Căscioarele (44.504082°N, 25.62943°E, the
shore of Argeș River), Falaștoaca (44.183311°N, 26.202961°E, CNP), Remuș (the
cemetery), Vlad Țepeș (44.136093°N, 26.121971°E, CNP). Habitats: cemeteries,
waterside, railway embankments. Population size: 1-2 on the scale.
Oenothera speciosa Nutt.: Adunații-Copăceni, Călugăreni (CNP), Frătești,
Remuș (the cemetery). Habitats: vacant lots, green spaces in front of residential areas.
Population size: 1-2 on the scale.
Oxalis corniculata L.: Varlaam (44.254515°N, 26.09104°E). Habitats: waterside,
meadow. Population size: 1 on the scale.
Oxalis stricta L.: Colibași, Mihai Bravu (CNP), Giurgiu. Habitats: railways,
meadow, asphalt cracks, green spaces in front of residential areas. Population size: 1 on
the scale.
Panicum capillare L.: 401A between Găiseni and Stoenești (44.49408°N,
25.677843°E, on the shore of Argeș River), Mihăilești, Frătești (the train station),
Gostinu (the beach on the bank of the Danube River), Malu Spart (the shore of Argeș
River), Podu Popa Nae (the shore of Argeș River), Slobozia (the beach on the bank of
the Danube River). Habitats: sandy beach on the Danube, dikes, railways, riverbanks,
concrete platforms, green spaces in front of residential areas. Population size: 1-3 on the
scale.
Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.: 401A between Găiseni and Stoenești
(44.49408°N, 25.677843°E, the shore of Argeș River), Mihăilești, Giurgiu (Giurgiu
Port, empty area between warehouses, cranes, the edge of the Danube River), Gostinu
(the beach on the bank of the Danube River). Habitats: sandy beach on the Danube,
vacant lots. Population size: 1 on the scale.
Parthenocissus inserta (A.Kern.) Fritsch.: Bolintin-Vale, Cămineasca, Crucea
de Piatră (CNP), Daia, Dărăști-Vlașca, Drăgăneasca, Giurgiu, Gorneni, Gostinu, Mihai
Bravu (CNP), Mihăilești, Novaci, Oncești, Remuș. Habitats: ruderal vegetation on the
Danube bank, roadside ditches, railway embankments, forests, vacant lots. Population
size: 1-4 on the scale.
Paspalum distichum L. (Paspalum paspalodes (Michx.) Scribn.): Gostinu (the
shore of Danube River), Slobozia (the shore of Danube River). Habitats: sandy beach on
the Danube. Population size: 4 on the scale.
Paulownia tomentosa (Thunb.) Steud.: E85 between Uzunu and Plopșoru,
Novaci, Oncești (43.968456°N, 25.857862°E, ruderal place at the edge of crops where
household waste is thrown). Habitats: roadside edges, green spaces in front of
residences. Population size: 1 on the scale.
Petrosedum ochroleucum (Chaix) Niederle (Sedum ochroleucum Chaix):
Frătești (the cemetery), Giurgiu (Sfântul Haralambie cemetery). Population size: 1 on
the scale.
Petunia integrifolia (Hook.) Schinz & Thell.: Crucea de Piatră (CNP), Giurgiu
(Giurgiu Port, Plantelor Canal, Bizetz Bridge, Port Road). Habitats: stone
embankments, sidewalk cracks, green spaces in front of residences. Population size:
1 on the scale.
88 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Gostinu (43.990978°N, 26.159966°E, in the forest on the banks of the Danube River,
43.992184°N, 26.113289°E, the edge of the road at the exit of the village, the bank of
the irrigation channel and the fence of the gardens). Habitats: gravel-covered
embankment, roadside, canals, meadow on the Danube bank. Population size: 1-4 on
the scale.
Solanum lycopersicum L.: Cămineasca (the area at the edge of the village,
where the garbage is stored), Frătești, Giurgiu (near the Bizetz Bridge, vacant place
between the warehouses in Giurgiu Port, the sandy bank of the Danube River), Gostinu,
Stoenești (the banks of the Sabar River and a vacant lot where household garbage is
thrown). Population size: 1 on the scale.
Solidago canadensis L.: Comana (44.173843°N, 26.133209°E, CNP), Frătești
(the cemetery), Popești. Habitats: lawns, vacant lots, green spaces in front of residential
areas. Population size: 1-2 on the scale.
Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.: Adunații-Copăceni, Bălănoaia, Bălanu, Băneasa,
Bâcu, Bolintin-Deal, Bolintin-Vale, Brăniștari (CNP), Braniștea, Călugăreni (CNP),
Cămineasca, Cetatea, Comana (CNP), Comasca, Cosoba, Crevedia Mare, Crivina,
Crucea de Piatră (CNP), Daia, Dărăști-Vlașca, Dealu, Drăgăneasca, Ghimpați, Giurgiu
(Giurgiu Port, the embankment of the railway and the surrounding areas, Plantelor
Canal, commercial area with supermarkets, Groapa cu Cenușă Lake and its
surroundings, the Bridge over the Danube to Ruse, the old customs house), Gorneni,
Gostinu, Hotarele, Izvoarele, Joița, Frasinu, Frătești, Malu Spart, Mihai Bravu (CNP),
Mihai Vodă, Mihăilești, Novaci, Obedeni, Oinacu, Oncești, Palanca, Pietrele (CNP),
Pietrișu, Podu Popa Nae, Prundu (CNP), Plopșoru, Popești, Puieni (CNP), Radu Vodă,
Remuș, Săbăreni, Schitu, Slobozia, Stâlpu, Stoenești, Tântava, Uzunu (CNP), Vadu Lat,
Valea Bujorului, Valea Dragului, Valea Plopilor, Vărăști, Vedea, Vieru, Vlad Țepeș
(CNP), Vlașin. Habitats: riverbank, railways, gravel-covered dikes, agricultural land,
forest edges, garbage deposits, green spaces in front of residential areas. Population
size: 1-5 on the scale.
Symphyotrichum lanceolatum (Willd.): Giurgiu (Plantelor Canal, Giurgiu Port
area), Gostinu (43.990486°N, 26.109335°E, the bed and banks of a dry irrigation
channel, the edge of the forest and the bank of the Danube River). Population size: 1 on
the scale.
Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G.L.Nesom: Giurgiu (43.883653°N,
25.963503°E, the embankment near the Bizetz Bridge, 43.888427°N, 25.975777°E, the
banks of the Plantelor Canal in the area of the pontoons, 43.895207°N, 25.958554°E,
Gării Street), Slobozia (43.840363°N, 25.896361°E, the ruderal area on the banks of a
water channel). Habitats: gravel-covered embankment, sandy beach on the Danube,
vacant lots, canals. Population size: 1, 2, 4 on the scale.
Xanthium orientale L. subsp. italicum (Moretti) Greuter: Adunații-Copăceni,
Bălănoaia, Băneasa, Bălanu, Bolintin-Deal, Bolintin-Vale, Braniștea, Călugăreni
(CNP), Cămineasca, Căscioarele, Cetatea, Clejani, Comana (CNP), Comasca, Cosoba,
Crivina, Crucea de Piatră (CNP), Daia, Dărăști-Vlașca, Gostinu, 401A between
Stoenești and Găiseni, 603 between Comana and Mihai Bravu (CNP), Falaștoaca
(CNP), Frasinu, Frătești, Ghimpați, Ghizdaru, Giurgiu (Giurgiu Port, Plantelor Canal,
commercial area with supermarkets, Groapa cu Cenușă Lake and its surroundings,
Bridge over the Danube River to Ruse, the old customs house), Gorneni, Gostinu,
Izvoarele, Izvoru, Malu Spart, Mihai Bravu (CNP), Mihai Vodă, Mihăilești, Milcovățu,
90 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Novaci, Obedeni, Oinacu, Oncești, Palanca, Pietrele (CNP), Plopșoru, Podu Popa Nae,
Popești, Puieni (CNP), Radu Vodă, Schitu, Slobozia, Stoenești, Tântava, Uzunu (CNP),
Valea Bujorului, Valea Dragului, Varlaam, Vedea, Vieru, Vlad Țepeș (CNP), Vlașin,
E85 between Uzunu and Daia, 504A between Gogoșari and Vieru, E70 between Stâlpu
and Valea Plopilor. Habitats: riverbanks, sidewalks, gravel-covered dikes, sandy beach
on the Danube, roadside, lakes, green spaces in front of residential areas. Population
size: 1-4 on the scale.
Xanthium spinosum L.: Cămineasca, Frătești, Ghimpați, Gostinu, Slobozia,
Vlad Țepeș (44.136093°N, 26.121971°E, CNP). Habitats: waterside, roadside, canals,
vacant lots, garbage deposits. Population size: 1-2 on the scale.
Yucca filamentosa L.: Bolintin-Vale (44.434784°N, 25.766123°E, garbage
storage area). Population size: 1 on the scale..
Zea mays L.: Crivina (44.434784°N, 25.766123°E, waste storage area on land),
Oinacu, Schitu, 507 between Braniștea and Gostinu, Giurgiu (43.865925°N,
25.956667°E, Giurgiu Port, ruderal places between warehouses, cranes). Habitats:
roadside, vacant lots, sandy beach on the Danube, garbage deposits. Population size:
1 on the scale.
Discussions
During our field study in Giurgiu County, we identified 89 alien plant taxa (see
Appendix 1). The literature data preceding our study had reported 65 alien plant species
(see Appendix 2), of which 34 eluded our observations. This variance could be
attributed to differences in transects or observation points compared to ours, as well as
an unspecified vegetation period in the literature. In contrast to the literature-reported
data, our research includes 58 taxons of alien plants newly reported at the county level
of Giurgiu (see Appendix 1). Some of these may have been inadvertently overlooked in
previous publications, potentially due to their widespread presence.
The taxa we identified are distributed across 32 botanical families (Fig. 2).
Among these families, the most well-represented are Asteraceae (23 taxa – 25.84%),
Amaranthaceae (9 taxa – 10.11%), Solanaceae (6 taxa – 6.74%), Poaceae (6 taxa –
6.74%), Fabaceae (4 taxa – 4.49%), Euphorbiaceae (3 taxa – 3.37%), Moraceae (3 taxa
– 3.37%), Onagraceae (3 taxa – 3.37%). The remaining 24 families are each represented
by two taxa (9 families) or one taxon (15 families) (Fig. 2).
The pattern of the families is mostly like national pattern corresponding with
temperate climate (Anastasiu & Negrean 2009) and of other vicinity countries such as
Bulgaria (Zahariev et al. 2021), Bosnia and Herzegovina (Barudanović et al. 2021).
Amaranthus with 8 species is the genus with the highest number of alien taxa.
The rest of the genera are represented by four species (Erigeron), by three species
(Euphorbia, Oenothera), by two species (8 genera) or by a single species (53 genera).
The analysis of life span shows a predominance of annuals with 49 species
(55.05%), while perennials are represented by 37 species (41.57%) and biennals by 3
species (3.37%) (Fig. 3).
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 91
25 23
20
Number of taxa
15
9
10
6 6
4 3 3 3
5
Botanical family
In terms of life form, the majority of annual alien plants are terophytes (46
species), thriving in habitats closely linked to human activity. These habitats include
areas along roadsides and railways (e.g., Amaranthus albus, Ambrosia artemisiifolia,
Erigeron canadensis, Portulaca oleracea), ruderal lands (e.g., Abutilon theophrasti,
Amaranthus retroflexus, Erigeron annuus, Ipomoea purpurea), locations where garbage
is dumped (e.g., Cannabis sativa, Artemisia annua, Solanum lycopersicum), cultivated
fields or their peripheries (e.g., Amaranthus retroflexus, Ambrosia artemisiifolia,
Datura stramonium, Galinsoga parviflora, Xanthium orientale subsp. italicum), areas in
front of courtyards or in cemeteries (e.g., Calendula officinalis, Cosmos bipinnatus,
92 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Datura wrightii, Mirabilis jalapa, Nicotiana alata). Additionally, some are found along
the banks of the Danube or the edges of water channels (e.g., Eclipta prostrata, Eleusine
indica, Euphorbia maculata, Lindernia dubia, Panicum capillare, Panicum
dichotomiflorum).
Within the annual species, we note the novel observation of the climbing plant
Sicyos angulatus, exhibiting significant abundance along the Danube riverbanks,
including proliferation within the vegetation on Ciobanu Island in Giurgiu.
Additionally, a newly reported species in Giurgiu County is the hydrophyte Lemna
minuta, thriving in ponds and channels near the Danube River.
Among the perennials, phanerophytes (17 taxa) dominate, followed by
hemicryptophytes (11 taxa), geophytes (5 taxa), and lianas (4 taxa). Chamaephytes and
hydrophytes each have only one representative (Fig. 4, Appendix 1).
Fig. 4. Life form spectrum of alien plant species from Giurgiu County
(see abbreviations in Material and methods)
More than half of the alien plant species, specifically 59 taxa (66.29%), are
also found within the mentioned protected areas, with the majority located in the
territory of Comana Natural Park (52.80%), spanning across 13 localities (Brăniștari,
Budeni, Călugăreni, Comana, Crucea de Piatră, Falaștoaca, Hulubești, Mihai Bravu,
Pietrele, Puieni, Prundu, Vlad Țepeș, and Uzunu). The most widely distributed alien
species in this protected areas are Sorghum halepense and Xanthium orientale subsp.
italicum, found in 10 localities, followed by Amaranthus retroflexus present in 9
localities. The species Erigeron canadensis, Gleditsia triacanthos, Morus alba, and
Robinia pseudoacacia are reported from 8 localities, while Amorpha fruticosa is found
in 7 localities, and Acer negundo and Erigeron canadensis were identified in 6 localities
within the Comana Natural Park. An additional 23 alien species were identified in a
single locality; however, many of these have the potential to spread further, as they are
ornamental species that have escaped from cultivation. Examples include Albizia
julibrissin, Calendula officinalis, Coreopsis tinctoria, Oenothera glazioviana,
Oenothera speciosa, Petunia integrifolia, Rudbekia triloba, Solidago canadensis, and
others. Also, Lemna minuta, reported by us for the first time in Giurgiu County in
Comana, is an aquatic species with the potential to expand through the Neajlov River
into the Argeș River and beyond.
Conclusions
During our field investigation, we identified a total of 89 alien plant species
within Giurgiu County, among which two, Ailanthus altissima and Elodea nuttallii, are
of European Union concern.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 95
References
Anastasiu, P. (coord.), Sîrbu, C., Urziceanu, M., Camen-Comănescu, P., Oprea, A.,
Nagodă, E., Gavrilidis, A.-A., Miu, I., Memedemin, D., Sîrbu, I., Manta, N.
(2019). Ghid de inventariere şi cartare a distribuţiei speciilor de plante alogene
invazive şi potenţial invazive din România [Guide to the inventory and mapping
of the distribution of invasive and potentially invasive alien plant species in
Romania]. Bucureşti: Ministerul Mediului, Apelor şi Pădurilor & Universitatea
din Bucureşti.
Anastasiu, P., Negrean, G., Pascale, G. & Liţescu, S. (2005). Plante ornamentale şi
invazive în flora României. Lucrări ştiinţifice ale Universităţii de Știinţe
Agricole şi Medicină Veterinară Ion Ionescu de la Brad, Iaşi, Seria Horticultură,
1(48), 619-624.
Aneva, I.Y., Zhelev, P. & Stoyanov, S.S. (2018). Alien species as a part of plant
composition in the periphery of agricultural fields. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica
Suppl, 11, 173-176.
Anghel, G., Chirilă, C., Ciocârlan, V., Turcu, G., Cosmin, S., Ungureanu, L., Marin,
J. & Calmuş, E. (1984). La distribution géographique de l’espéce Sorghum
halepense (L.) Pers. dans le sud-est de la Roumanie. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest.,
17, 155-158.
96 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Barudanović, S., Zečić, E., Macanović, A., Duraković, B. & Mašić, E. (2021). Invasive
alien plant species in global perspectives with special references to Bosnia and
Herzegovina. Invasive Alien Species: Observations and Issues from Around the
World, 3, 215-252.
Borza, A. (1947). Conspectus Florae Romaniae, Regionumque affinium. Cluj: Edit.
Cartea Românească.
Borza, A. (1966). Cercetări asupra florei şi vegetaţiei din Câmpia Română I. Contribuții
Botanice Cluj, 141-162.
Borza, A. (1968). Cercetări asupra florei şi vegetaţiei din Câmpia Română I. Contribuții
Botanice Cluj, 149-183.
Brândză, D. (1879-1883). Prodomul Florei Române sau enumerațiunea plantelor pană
astă-di cunoscute în Moldova și Valachia. Bucuresci: Tipogr. Academiei
Române.
Buia, A. (1938). Cuscutele României. Bul. Fac. Agron. Cluj, VII/1938/, 1-144.
Chytrý, M., Jarošík, V., Pyšek, P., Hájek, O., Knollová, I., Tichý, L. & Danihelka, J.
(2008). Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of
invasion. Ecology, 89(6), 1541-1553.
Chytrý, M., Maskell, L.C., Pino, J., Pyšek, P., Vilà, M., Font, X. & Smart, S.M. (2008).
Habitat invasions by alien plants: a quantitative comparison among
Mediterranean, subcontinental and oceanic regions of Europe. Journal of Applied
Ecology, 45(2), 448-458.
Ciocârlan, V. (2000). Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta
(ed. II). Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres.
Ciocârlan, V. (2009). Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta
(ed. III). Bucureşti: Edit. Ceres.
Costea, M. (1998). Cercetări monografice asupra genului Amaranthus L. din România.
Teză de doctorat. Universitatea Bucureşti.
Davis, M.A., Grime, J.P. & Thompson, K. (2000). Fluctuating resources in plant
communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of ecology, 88(3), 528-534.
Dihoru, G. & Negrean, G. (2009). Cartea roşie a plantelor vasculare din România. Editura
Academiei Române.
Doltu, M.I., Popescu, A., Sanda, V. & Nedelcu, G.A. (1984). Analiza cormofitelor din
Câmpia Munteniei. Studii şi Com Muzeul de Ştiinţe Naturale Brukenthal Sibiu, 26,
49-124.
Dumitraşcu, M., Grigorescu, I., Kucsicsa, G., Dragotă, C.S. & Năstase, M. (2011). Non-
native and native invasive terrestrial plant species in Comana Natural Park.
Case-studies: Amorpha fruticosa and Crataegus monogyna. Romanian Journal of
Geography, 55(2), 81-89.
Follak, S., Eberius, M., Essl, F., Fürdös, A., Sedlacek, N. & Trognitz, F. (2018).
Invasive alien plants along roadsides in Europe. EPPO Bulletin, 48(2), 256-265.
Ghișa, E. (1972). Sorghum. In T. Săvulescu (Ed.). Flora României. Vol. 12 (p. 57).
București: Edit. Academiei Române.
Grecescu, D. (1898). Conspectul florei României: Plantele vasculare indigene şi cele
naturalizate ce se găsesc pe teritoriul României, considerate subt punctul de
vedere sistematic şi geografic. Tipogr. Dreptatea. 836 p.
Grecescu, D. (1909). Suplement la Conspectul florei romaniei. Bucuresti: Institutul de
Arte Grafice Carol Gbl.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 97
Grințescu, I. (1957). Trigonella. In T. Săvulescu (Ed.). Flora României. Vol. 5 (p. 111).
București: Edit. Academiei Române.
Hulme, P.E. (2007). Biological invasions in Europe: drivers, pressures, states, impacts
and responses. Biodiversity under threat, 25, 56-80.
Ianovici, N. (2011). Approaches on the invasive alien taxa in Romania-Ambrosia
artemisiifolia (ragweed) II. Annals of West University of Timişoara, ser. Biology,
14, 93-112.
Kanitz, A. (1879-1881). Plantas Romaniae hucusque cognitas. Claudiopoli, Apud E.
Demjén.
Lambdon, P.W., Pyšek, P., Basnou, C., Hejda, M., Arianoutsou, M., Essl, F., Jarosik,
V., Pergl, J., Winter, M., Anastasiu, P., Andriopoulos, P., Bazos, I., Brundu, G.,
Celesti-Grapow, L., Chassot, P., Delipetrou, P., Josefsson, M., Kark, S., Klotz,
S., Kokkoris, Y., Kühn, I., Marchante, H., Perglová, I., Pino, J., Vilà, M., Zikos,
A., Roy, D. & Hulme, P.E. (2008). Alien flora of Europe: species diversity,
temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia, 80, 101–149.
Lițescu, S., Pascale, G., Sârbu, A. & Smarandache, D. (2004). Chorology of the species
Elodea nuttallii on tha lower course of the Danube (Baziaș-Călărași) and Danube
Delta. Stud. Cerc. Biol., Univ. Bacău, 9, 13-16.
Lodge, D.M. (1993). Species invasions and deletions: community effects and responses
to climate and habitat change. Species invasions and deletions: community
effects and responses to climate and habitat change., 367-387.
Morariu, I. (1943). Asociaţii de plante antropofile din jurul Bucureştiului, cu observaţii
asupra răspândirii lor în ţară şi mai ales în Transilvania. Bul. Grăd. Bot. Muz.
Bot. Cluj, 23(3-4), 131-212.
Morariu, I. (1946). Materiale pentru flora judeţului Vlaşca. Analele Academiei Române,
Memor. Secţ. Şt., Ser. III, 21(8), 1–56.
Morariu, I. (1952). Amaranthus. In T. Săvulescu (Ed.). Flora României.Vol. 1 (p. 584).
București: Edit. Academiei Române.
Morariu, I. (1958). Abutilon. In T. Săvulescu (Ed.). Flora României.Vol. 6 (p. 29).
București: Edit. Academiei Române.
Negrean, G. (1968). Contribuţii la flora României, Stud. Cerc. Biol., Ser. Bot., 20(4),
333-336.
Negrean, G. (2011). Addenda to “Flora Romaniae”, volumes 1-12. Newly published plants,
nomenclature, taxonomy, chorology and commentaries (Part 1). Kanitzia 18, 89-194.
Negrean, G. (2012). Addenda to “Flora Romaniae”, volumes 1-12. Newly published
plants, nomenclature, taxonomy, chorology and commentaries (Part 2). Kanitzia,
19, 195-233.
Nedelcu, G.A. (1967). Vegetatia acvatică și palustră a lacului Comana. Luc. Grad. Bot.
Bucuresti, 1966, 385-408.
Nedelcu, G.A., Sanda, V. & Popescu, A. (1991). Vegetaţia acvatică de pe teritoriul
staţiunii Fao, Băneasa-Giurgiu. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest., 21, 91–95.
Nikolić, T., Mitić, B., Milašinović, B. & Jelaska, S.D. (2013). Invasive alien plants in
Croatia as a threat to biodiversity of South-Eastern Europe: Distributional
patterns and range size. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 336(2), 109-121.
Nyárády, E.I. (1964). Artemisia. In T. Săvulescu (Ed.). Flora României. Vol. 9 (p. 455).
București: Edit. Academiei Române.
98 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Nyárády, E.I. (1964). Xanthium. In T. Săvulescu (Ed.). Flora României. Vol. 9 (p. 307).
București: Edit. Academiei Române.
Oprea, A., Sârbu, A. & Pascale, G. (2004). A new contribution to the knowledge of
flora and vegetation along Danube River, between Zimnicea and Călăraşi towns
(Romania). Note I. Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest, 31, 141-146.
Oprea, A. (2005). Lista critică a plantelor vasculare din România. Iași: Editura
Universităţii “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”.
Panţu, Z.C. (1909-1912). Contribuţiuni la flora Bucureştilor şi a împrejurimilor sale I-
IV. București. Tipogr. Acad. Române.
Paşcovschi, S., Doniţă, N. (1967). Vegetaţia lemnoasă din silvostepa României.
Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. R.S. România.
Paucă-Comănescu, M. & Bândiu, C. (2001) Structural diversity of the tree layer in Fântânele
Forest (Comana Forest Department), Rev. Roum. Biol. – Biol. Veget., 2, 69-81.
Paucă-Comănescu, M., Negrean, G., Paspaleva, M., Tălpeanu, M., Doniţă, N., Bândiu,
C., Onete, M. (2001) Pădurea Fântânele (Comana) – Arie de conservare a
biodiversităţii native a pădurilor şi zonelor umede din Câmpia Română.
Ocrotirea Naturii şi a Mediului Înconjurător, 44–45, 15–27.
POIM 2020 - Ministerul Mediului, Apelor şi Pădurilor & Universitatea din Bucureşti
(2020). Baza de date Microsoft Excel cu informaţii relevante din literatură
privind caracteristicile speciilor de plante alogene invazive şi potenţial invasive.
Retrieved March, 2023, from: http://invazive.ccmesi.ro/wp-content/uploads/
2020/02/POIM_120008_Subactv.-1.1.1_Baza-de-date-15082019.pdf.
Popescu, A. (1971). Analiza cormofitelor de la Greaca şi împrejurimi. Studii şi
Cercetări de Biologie. Seria Botanică, 23(3), 231-142.
Pyšek, P., Bacher, S., Chytrý, M., Jarošík, V., Wild, J., Celesti‐Grapow, L., Gassó, N.,
Kenis, M., Lambdon, P.W., Nentwig, W., Pergl, J., Roques, A., Sadló, J.,
Solarz, W., Vilà, M. & Hulme, P.E. (2010). Contrasting patterns in the invasions
of European terrestrial and freshwater habitats by alien plants, insects and
vertebrates. Global ecology and biogeography, 19(3), 317-331.
Pyšek, P., Lambdon, P.W., Arianoutsou, M., Kühn, I., Pino, J. & Winter, M. (2009).
Alien vascular plants of Europe. Handbook of alien species in Europe, 43-61.
Pyšek, P., Richardson, D.M., Rejmánek, M., Webster, G.L., Williamson, M. &
Kirschner, J. (2004). Alien plants in checklists and floras: towards better
communication between taxonomists and ecologists. Taxon, 53(1), 131-143.
Richardson, D.M., Pyšek, P., Rejmánek, M., Barbour, M.G., Panetta, F.D. & West, C.J.
(2000). Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions.
Diversity and distributions, 6(2), 93-107.
Rounsevell, M.D.A., Reginster, I., Araújo, M.B., Carter, T.R., Dendoncker, N., Ewert,
F., House, J.I., Kankaanpää, S., Leemans, R., Metzger, M.J., Smith, P. & Tuck,
G. (2006). A coherent set of future land use change scenarios for Europe.
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 114(1), 57-68.
Săndulescu, N. & Pădure, I.M. (2003). Chorological and ecological aspects on Conyza
canadensis (L.) Cronq. (Asteraceae, Asteroideae) in Romania. Lucr. Şti.
U.S.A.M.V. Bucureşti, 46, 30-33.
Silva, L. & Smith, C.W. (2006). A quantitative approach to the study of non-indigenous
plants: an example from the Azores Archipelago. Biodiversity & Conservation,
15, 1661-1679.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 99
Sîrbu, C. & Oprea, A. (2011). Plante adventive în flora României. Iaşi: Edit. Ion
Ionescu de la Brad.
Sîrbu, I., Ştefan, N. & Oprea, A. (2013). Plante Vasculare din România. Determinator
ilustrat de teren. Bucureşti: Edit. Victor B Victor
South Muntenia Regional Development Agency. (n.d.). Despre județul Giurgiu. Accesat
la https://giurgiu.insse.ro/despre-noi/despre-judetul-giurgiu/
Şerbănescu, I. (1961). Hordeum secalinum Schreb., o nouă specie pentru flora R.P.R.,
Comunic. Acad. R. P. Române, 11(2), 211-213.
Tarnavschi, I.T., Paucă, A., Andrei, M., Cristurean, I., Ionescu, V., Lungu, L., Nedelcu,
G.A., Petria, E., Popescu, A., Rădulescu, D., Rădulescu-Mitroi, N. &
Şerbănescu-Jitariu, G. (1974). La flore du complexe de Comana. Acta Horti Bot.
Bucurest., 12, 239–287.
Vukovic, N., Bernardic, A., Nikolic, T., Hrsak, V., Plazibat, M. & Jelaska, S.D. (2010).
Analysis and distributional patterns of the invasive flora in a protected mountain
area-a case study of Medvednica Nature Park (Croatia). Acta Societatis
Botanicorum Poloniae, 79(4).
WCVP (2022). World Checklist of Vascular Plants, version 2.0. Facilitated by the
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Published on the Internet; http://wcvp.science.
kew.org/ Retrieved 16 March 2023.
Zahariadi, C. (1955). Două specii de buruieni din orezării noi pentru flora R.P.R.
Comunic. Acad. R P.R., Ser. Agron., 5(5), 827-831.
Zahariev, D., Ivanova, N. & Nasuf, A. (2021). Invasive alien plant species distributed as
weeds in arable land in Bulgaria. Acta Scientifica Naturalis, 8(3).
RomaniaDateGeografice.net. (2023). Giurgiu - Unități administrative-teritoriale. Retrieved
from: https://romaniadategeografice.net/unitati-admin-teritoriale/judete/judete-g/
giurgiu/
Plan de Management al Parcului Natural Comana. (2018). Retrieved from
http://www.comanaparc.ro
100 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 101
102 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 103
104 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 105
106 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 107
108 NAGODĂ E., HOVANEȚ M.V., URZICEANU M.
Alien plants species in Giurgiu County: Romania: an inventory and distribution analysis 109
Acta Horti Bot. Bucurest. 2023, 49: 111-113
referred in the text using the author(s) name(s) followed by “unpubl.” or “pers. comm.”
and cannot be included in the reference list.
Tables should be numbered with Arabic numerals in the order in which they are
cited in the text (e.g. Table 3). They must have brief, concise titles and legends that will
make the general meaning of the table comprehensible. The titles should be placed at
the top of the tables. Explanatory footnotes may be placed below the table written with
lowercase letters. All abbreviations must be explained in the legends. The size of table
should be proportional to the journal’s page (125 190 mm).
The illustrations could be represented by photographs, graphs, diagrams, maps,
schemes and must be sharp and of high quality. They should be referred as figures
(abbreviations: Fig., Figs) and numbered with Arabic numerals (e.g. Fig. 1). All
illustrations must be submitted electronically as distinctive files. Their titles and /or
legends should be written consequently on a separate sheet. If the photographs are
arranged in plates, these should be designated by Roman numerals, while the individual
photographs are designated by Arabic numerals (e.g. Plate II, Fig. 2). The bar scale is
required for the figures. Any signs and letters in the illustrations must be enough large
to be read without problem. Hand-written signs and letters are not accepted. The final
size of illustrations should be proportional to the journal’s page (125 190 mm).
References at the end of the paper must be in the APA Reference Style:
For periodic journals
1. Bechet, M. & Coman, N. (1964). Contribuţii la cunoaşterea micromicetelor parazite
pe plante rare din flora R.P.R. (Contribution á la connaissance des
micromycétes parasites sur plantes rares de la flore de Romanie). Studiu Univ.
Babeş-Bolyai, Ser. Biol./1964/(1), 49-57.
2. Borza, A. (1966). Cercetări asupra florei şi vegetaţiei din Câmpia Română (i).
Contrib. Bot. Cluj, /1966/(2), 141-162.
3. Buttler, K.P. (1969). Chromosomanzahlen und Taxonomische bemerkungen zu
einigen Rumanischen Angiospermen. Rev. Roumaine Biol., Bot., 14(5), 275-282.
For books
1. Brandza, D. (1879-1883). Prodromul Florei Române sau enumeraţiunea plantelor
până astă-di cunoscute în Moldova şi Valachia. Bucuresci: Tipogr. Academiei
Române.
2. Beldie, A. (1967). Flora şi vegetaţia munţilor Bucegi. Bucureşti: Edit. Acad. Române.
For serials
1. Tutin, T.G., Burges, N.A, Chater, A.O., Edmonson, J.R., Heywood, V.H., Moore,
D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M. & Webb, D.A. (eds, assist. by J.R.
Akeroyd & M.E. Newton; appendices ed. by R.R. Mill). (1996). Flora
Europaea. 2nd ed., 1993, reprinted 1996. Vol. 1. Psilotaceae to Platanaceae.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
For chapter in serials
1. Beldie, A. (1955). Leontice. In T. Săvulescu (Ed.). Flora României. Vol. 3. (p. 33).
Bucureşti: Edit. Academiei Române.
2. Borza, A. (1931). Die Vegetation und Flora Rumänien. In A. Borza (Ed.). Guide de
la Sixième Excursion Phytogeographique Internationale Roumanie (pp. 1-55).
Cluj: Institutul de literatură şi Tipografie Minerva S.A.
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE AUTHORS 113
The scientific reviewers analyse every paper and those not conforming to the
journal’s requirements will not be published.
The corresponding author will be supplied with one free volume.
Reproducerea integrală sau parţială, multiplicarea prin orice mijloace şi sub orice formă,
cum ar fi xeroxarea, scanarea, transpunerea în format electronic sau audio, punerea la
dispoziţia publică, inclusiv prin internet sau prin reţele de calculatoare, stocarea
permanentă sau temporară pe dispozitive sau sisteme cu posibilitatea recuperării
informaţiilor, cu scop comercial sau gratuit, precum şi alte fapte similare săvârşite fără
permisiunea scrisă a deţinătorului copyright-ului reprezintă o încălcare a legislaţiei cu
privire la protecţia proprietăţii intelectuale şi se pedepsesc penal şi/sau civil în
conformitate cu legile în vigoare.
tipografia.unibuc@unibuc.ro