SM 10
SM 10
CHAPTER 10
Learning Objectives
1. Identify the business importance and characteristics of
property, plant, and equipment assets and explain the
recognition criteria.
2. Identify the costs to include in the measurement of property,
plant, and equipment at acquisition.
3. Determine asset cost when the transaction has delayed
payment terms or is a lump-sum purchase, a nonmonetary
exchange, or a contributed asset.
4. Identify the costs included in specific types of property, plant,
and equipment.
5. Understand and apply the cost model, the revaluation model
using the asset adjustment method, and the fair value model
6. Explain and apply the accounting treatment for costs incurred
after acquisition.
7. Identify differences in accounting between IFRS and ASPE,
and what changes are expected in the near future.
8. Calculate the amount of borrowing costs to capitalize for
qualifying assets.
9. Understand and apply the revaluation model using the
proportionate method.
LO Learning objective
BT Bloom's Taxonomy
K Knowledge
C Comprehension
AP Application
AN Analysis
S Synthesis
E Evaluation
Difficulty: Level of difficulty
S Simple
M Moderate
C Complex
Time: Estimated time to complete in minutes
AACSB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business
Communication Communication
Ethics Ethics
Analytic Analytic
Tech. Technology
Diversity Diversity
Reflec. Thinking Reflective Thinking
CPA CM CPA Canada Competency Map
Ethics Professional and Ethical Behaviour
PS and DM Problem-Solving and Decision-Making
Comm. Communication
Self-Mgt. Self-Management
Team & Lead Teamwork and Leadership
Reporting Financial Reporting
Stat. & Gov. Strategy and Governance
Mgt. Accounting Management Accounting
Audit Audit and Assurance
Finance Finance
Tax Taxation
DAIS Data Analytics and Information Systems
1. Definition and 1, 2 1, 5, 7 1, 3, 6
recognition of PP&E
5. The cost model, 19,21, 22 23, 24, 25, 10, 11, 12,
revaluation model 26,27 13
using asset reduction
method, and the fair
value model
a.
b.
c.
a.
b.
c.
IFRS
Direct labour $73,000
Material purchased for building 82,500
Interest on loan to finance construction 2,300
Allocation of variable plant overhead based on
labour hours worked on building 29,000
Architectural drawings for building 7,500
Total cost of new building $194,300
ASPE
Direct labour $73,000
Indirect labour 6,000
Material purchased for building 82,500
Allocation of variable plant overhead based on
labour hours worked on building 29,000
Architectural drawings for building 7,500
Total cost of new building $198,000
a. Purchase:
Equipment.........................................................................
40,000
Accounts Payable.................................................... 40,000
To record purchase of equipment on account
Payment:
Accounts Payable.............................................................
40,000
Equipment................................................................ 800
Cash.......................................................................... 39,200
To record payment on account
b. Purchase:
Equipment.........................................................................
40,000
Accounts Payable.................................................... 40,000
To record purchase of equipment on account
Payment:
Accounts Payable.............................................................
40,000
Cash.......................................................................... 40,000
To record payment on account
Finance Expense..............................................................
800
Equipment................................................................ 800
To record discount lost
Vehicles.............................................................................
58,802
Notes Payable.......................................................... 58,802
Using tables:
Present value of the single payment
$80,000 X .73503 $58,802.40
Result: $58,802.39
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
Vehicles ............................................................................
80,000
Notes Payable.......................................................... 80,000
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 5 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
Fair % of Recorded
Value Total Cost Amount
Land $ 95,000 95/455 $406,000 $ 84,769
Building 250,000 250/455 406,000 223,077
Equipment 110,000 110/455 406,000 98,154
$455,000 $406,000
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 10 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
a.
Land ..................................................................................
85,000
Common Shares...................................................... 85,000
Under IFRS, the fair value of the asset acquired should be used
to measure its acquisition cost, unless that fair value cannot be
estimated reliably.
b.
Land ...................................................................................
85,000
Common Shares...................................................... 85,000
Under ASPE, the more reliable of the fair value of the asset
received or the equity instruments given up should be used to
measure the acquisition cost of the asset. In this example, the
common shares are so thinly traded (infrequent trading) that the
estimated fair value of the land is more reliable, and the land
would be recorded at $85,000.
LO 3,7 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
Vehicles (new)...................................................................
2,600
Accumulated Depreciation - Vehicles............................. 20,700
Vehicles (old)........................................................... 23,000
Cash.......................................................................... 300
Equipment1........................................................................
7,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery......................... 2,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery....................................... 4,000
Machinery................................................................. 9,000
Cash.......................................................................... 4,000
Vehicles (new)1..................................................................
33,000
Loss on Disposal of Vehicles.......................................... 1,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Vehicles............................. 27,000
Vehicles (used)........................................................ 30,000
Cash.......................................................................... 31,000
The price of the new vehicle is the list price of $36,000 less the
discount of $3,000 or $33,000. This is the fair value of the new
vehicle.
Vehicles (new)...................................................................
33,000
Loss on Disposal of Vehicles.......................................... 1,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Vehicles............................. 27,000
Vehicles (used)........................................................ 30,000
Cash.......................................................................... 31,000
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
Land 470,000
Cash.......................................................................... 470,000
To record purchase of land
Cash ...................................................................................
140,000
Land.......................................................................... 140,000
To record collection of grant received
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 10 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
Land 470,000
Cash.......................................................................... 470,000
To record purchase of land
Cash ...................................................................................
140,000
Deferred Revenue–Government Grants................ 140,000
To record collection of grant received
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 10 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
a.
Equipment.........................................................................
55,000
Contributed Surplus – Donated Capital................. 55,000
b.
Equipment.........................................................................
55,000
Donation Revenue................................................... 55,000
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 10 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
a. IFRS
Mineral Resources1...........................................................
487,700
Cash.......................................................................... 487,700
To record the purchase and development costs of gold mine
Mineral Resources............................................................
12,300
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment........................................................... 12,300
To record cost of construction of mine shafts
Mineral Resources2...........................................................
95,000
Asset Retirement Obligation............................... 95,000
To record asset retirement obligation
1
$400,000 + $100,000 - $12,300 = $487,700
2
$75,000 + $20,000
b. ASPE
Mineral Resources1...........................................................
487,700
Cash.......................................................................... 487,700
To record the purchase and development costs of gold mine
Mineral Resources............................................................
12,300
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment........................................................... 12,300
To record cost of construction of mine shafts
Mineral Resources............................................................
75,000
Asset Retirement Obligation............................... 75,000
To record asset retirement obligation
1
$400,000 + $100,000 - $12,300 = $487,700
LO 4 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
a.
b.
Proportional
Before after
revaluation revaluation
(A) (B) (B) – (A)
Buildings $400,000 x 330/290 $455,172 $55,172
Accumulated
depreciation 110,000 x 330/290 125,172 15,172
Carrying amount $290,000 x 330/290 $330,000 40,000
Buildings ..........................................................................
55,172
Accumulated Depreciation -
Buildings.............................................................. 15,172
Revaluation Surplus (OCI)...................................... 40,000
To adjust the Buildings account (net) to
fair value
LO 5.9 BT: AP Difficulty: C Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
a. Cost Model
Jan. 5 Cash....................................................... 325,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Buildings 110,000
Buildings........................................... 400,000
Gain on Disposal of Buildings......... 35,000
a.
The cost of the new powertrain is measurable and it will produce
future economic benefits to Shipper. Thus, the new powertrain
should be recognized as an asset.
b.
Under IFRS, for replacement parts that meet the recognition
criteria for PP&E, the replaced part’s carrying amount is
removed from the asset account whether it was originally
recognized as a separate component or not, and the cost of the
replacement part is capitalized as a separate component. The
original invoice for the transport truck did not specify the cost of
the powertrain (i.e., it appears it was not componentized on the
original purchase); however, the cost of the replacement—
$40,000—can be used as an indication (usually by discounting)
of the likely cost of the item seven years ago. If an appropriate
discount rate is taken, say 5% per annum for this example,
$40,000 discounted back seven years amounts to $28,427
($40,000 / (1.05)7), which should be removed from the asset
account along with the related accumulated depreciation on the
old powertrain to date, and the difference recorded as a loss.
The cost of the new power train, $40,000, would be capitalized
and depreciated as a separate component in its own asset
account.
c.
Under ASPE, for major replacements, if the cost of the previous
part is known, its carrying amount is removed from the asset
account. If not, the asset account, its accumulated depreciation,
or an expense could be charged with the cost. The original
invoice for the transport truck did not specify the cost of the
power-
train; it is assumed that the cost of the previous powertrain is
not known. Therefore, the asset account, its accumulated
depreciation, or an expense could be debited with the cost of the
new powertrain.
Solutions Manual 10.26 Chapter 10
Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Wiecek, McConomy Intermediate Accounting, Thirteenth Canadian Edition
LO 6,7 BT: C Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
Expenditures
Capitalization Weighted-Average
Date Amount Period Accumulated
Expenditures
3/1 $1,500,000 10/12 $1,250,000
6/1 1,200,000 7/12 700,000
$1,950,000
LO 2,8 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 10 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
$785,000
Capitalization rate = = 14.27%
$5,500,000
LO 2,8 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
LO 2,7,8 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
SOLUTIONS TO EXERCISES
EXERCISE 10.1
LO 1 BT: C Difficulty: S Time: 25 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.2
a. Machinery:
Cash paid for machinery, including sales tax of $107,000
$7,000
Freight and insurance while in transit 2,000
Cost of moving machinery into place at factory 3,100
Wage cost for technicians to test machinery 4,000
Materials cost for testing 500
Special plumbing fixtures required for new
machinery 8,000
Provincial government grant (25,000)
Total cost $99,600
b. Equipment (Self-Constructed):
Material and purchased parts ($200,000 X .98) $196,000
Labour costs for manufacturing the equipment 190,000
Overhead costs (only variable portion 30,000
capitalized)
Cost of installing equipment 4,400
Total cost $420,400
b. (continued)
EXERCISE 10.3
a.
1. Land ...................................................................................
92,000
Revenue -- Government Grants.............................. 92,000
2. Land ...................................................................................
407,000
Buildings – Structure........................................................
887,000
Buildings – HVAC.............................................................
220,000
Buildings – Interior Coverings.........................................
116,000
Common Shares...................................................... 1,630,000
3. Machinery..........................................................................
89,305
1
Inventory ................................................................. 32,325
Salaries and Wages Expense................................. 56,000
Supplies.................................................................... 980
1
($23,000 + $625 + $8,700)
Note: For PP&E assets, only the directly attributable costs
are capitalized. Since fixed overhead is generally not
directly attributable, but rather allocated on some rational
basis, the fixed overhead applied of $39,200 (70% x
$56,000) is generally expensed rather than capitalized. Any
lost revenue attributed to the downtime during
construction is not realized and should not be recorded.
EXERCISE 10.4
a.
b.
c.
d.
Errors are most easily made distinguishing between land and
land improvements purchases. Land does not depreciate but
land improvements, because of their limited useful lives, must
be depreciated. An error charging a land improvement to land
would cause an increase in income for the duration of the land
improvement’s useful life and an increase in assets as long as
the land is owned. Similarly, if there is an amount charged to
building, rather than the land account, it would cause a
decrease in income each year (relating to an overstatement of
annual depreciation expense) and a decrease to assets as long
as the land is owned.
LO 2,3,7 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 40 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*EXERCISE 10.5
a.
Hayes Industries Corp.
Acquisition of Assets 1 and 2
Machinery..........................................................................
75,000
Equipment.........................................................................
25,000
Cash..........................................................................
100,000
Acquisition of Asset 3
Use the cash price as a basis for recording the asset with a
discount recorded on the note.
Machinery..........................................................................
35,000
Cash..........................................................................10,000
Notes Payable..........................................................25,000
The difference between the $25,000 notes payable and the sum
of the two instalment payments of $15,000 each will be
amortized to interest expense over the two years using the
effective interest method.
a. (continued)
Acquisition of Asset 4
Vehicles (new)1..................................................................
60,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Vehicles.............................
35,000
Cash.........................................................................10,000
Vehicles (old)...........................................................85,000
1
$85,000 – $35,000 + $10,000
Acquisition of Asset 5
Equipment ........................................................................
900
Common Shares...................................................... 900
a. (continued)
Construction of Building
$37,000
Capitalization rate = = 6.73%
$550,000
a. (continued)
Land ..................................................................................
150,000
1
Buildings ($1,060,000 + $47,300).................................... 1,107,300
Cash.......................................................................... 1,210,000
Interest Expense...................................................... 47,300
1
($1,210,000 less $150,000 for land)
Result: 13.066%
The effective interest rate is 13.066%. This rate should be used
to amortize to interest expense over the two-year period.
LO 2,3,7,8 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 35 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.6
EXERCISE 10.7
EXERCISE 10.8
Land
Item Land Improve- Buildings Other Accounts
ments
1. ($275,000)
Notes Payable
2. $275,000
3. $8,000
4. 7,000
5. 6,000
6. (1,000)
7. 22,000
8. 250,000
9. 9,000
10. $ 4,000
11. 11,000
12. (5,000)
13. 13,000
14. 19,000
15. 14,000
16. 3,000
17. 150
GST Receivable
LO 2,4 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.9
Buildings
Buildings – Structure 55% $2,142,305
Buildings – HVAC 35% 1,363,285
Buildings – Roof 10% 389,510
100% $3,895,100
LO 2,4 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.10
a.
The purchase cost of $472,000, the royalties payable under the
purchase agreement, the legal obligation of $46,000 related to
future cleanup and reconditioning costs, and the constructive
obligation of $30,000 would be capitalized in the Mineral
Resources asset account. The remainder of the costs
described would be considered operational and expensed
during the period.
b.
Under ASPE, only the purchase cost of $472,000, the royalties
payable under the purchase agreement and the legal obligation
of $46,000 related to future cleanup and reconditioning costs
would be capitalized in the Mineral Resources asset account.
The cost of the constructive obligation of $30,000 would not be
capitalized.
c.
Under IFRS, both the legal obligation of $46,000 and the
constructive obligation of $30,000 are recorded as a liability on
the company’s statement of financial position. Therefore, under
IFRS, debt increases by $76,000. Total assets increase by the
same amount. Overall, as a result of the purchase agreement,
debt to total assets increases to 61%1, signalling that the
percentage of total assets provided by creditors has increased,
which a creditor would view as unfavourable. The creditor may
also analyze that the legal and constructive obligations are
included in debt in the debt to total assets ratio, but that they
will not result in cash outflows until the mine is abandoned,
which may take place several years in the future.
Befor Effect of
e lease After
Total liabilities $580 add $76 $656
Total assets 1,000 add $76 1,076
EXERCISE 10.11
a.
1. Vehicles (#1)......................................................................
23,900
Cash..........................................................................
23,900
To record purchase of Truck #1
2. Vehicles (#2)......................................................................
25,636
Cash..........................................................................2,000
Notes Payable.......................................................... 23,636
To record purchase of Truck #2
Using tables:
Present value of the single payment
$26,000 X .90909 $23,636.34
a. (continued)
2. (continued)
Result: $23,636.36
3. Vehicles (#3)......................................................................
21,000
Sales Revenue......................................................... 21,000
To record purchase of Truck #3
a. (continued)
b.
Transaction 4 involves a share-based payment. Under ASPE,
the more reliable of the fair value of the asset received or the
equity instruments given up should be used to measure the
acquisition cost of the asset. If Jackson prepares financial
statements in accordance with ASPE, it would be a private
company, and its shares would not be actively traded. The fair
value of its common shares would likely not be more reliable
than the fair value of the truck, therefore the fair value of the
truck (as determined by a reliable, independent appraiser, for
example or from negotiating a cash purchase) would be used
to measure the acquisition cost.
LO 3,7 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.12
a. 1. Land ...................................................................................
131,250
Buildings – Structure........................................................
260,313
Buildings – Roof...............................................................
45,937
Equipment.........................................................................
262,500
Cash..........................................................................
700,000
$150,000
$700,000 X = $131,250 Land
$800,000
$350,000
$700,000 X = $306,250 Buildings
$800,000
Buildings
Buildings – Structure 85% 260,313
Buildings – Roof 15% 45,937
100% $306,250
$300,000
$700,000 X = $262,500 Equipment
$800,000
2. Equipment.........................................................................
25,000
Cash..........................................................................
2,000
Notes Payable..........................................................
23,000
3. Equipment1........................................................................
19,600
Accounts Payable....................................................
19,600
1
($20,000 X .98)
4. Land ...................................................................................
27,000
Revenue--Government Grants 27,000
5. Buildings...........................................................................
600,000
Cash..........................................................................
600,000
b. 1. Buildings – Structure........................................................
260,313
Buildings – Roof...............................................................
45,937
Land ($150,000 – $131,250)..................................... 18,750
Buildings..................................................................
250,000
2
Equipment ...............................................................
37,500
2
($300,000 – $262,500)
2. Interest Payable................................................................
2,300
Equipment................................................................
2,300
3. Purchase Discounts.........................................................
400
Cash ………………………………. 19,600
Equipment................................................................
400
Accounts Payable ……….. 19,600
4. Land ...................................................................................
27,000
Revenue – Government Grants 27,000
5. Sales Revenue..................................................................
140,000
Buildings..................................................................
140,000
EXERCISE 10.13
Accounts Payable.............................................................
56,000
Finance Expense..............................................................
560
Equipment ($56,000 X .01)...................................... 560
Cash..........................................................................
56,000
Payment on account
Accounts Payable.............................................................
40,500
Cash..........................................................................
40,500
Payment on account
Result: $35,182.22
EXERCISE 10.14
a.
1. Land ...................................................................................
550,000
Buildings – Structure........................................................
1,500,000
Buildings – HVAC.............................................................
175,000
Machinery..........................................................................
725,000
Common Shares ..................................................... 2,950,000
Machinery1.........................................................................
312,900
Repairs and Maintenance Expense.................................
12,500
Cash..........................................................................
325,400
1
($305,000 X 98%) + $14,000
To record payments related to machinery
b.
Under ASPE, the more reliable of the fair value of each asset
received or the equity instruments given up should be used to
measure the acquisition cost. If Craig prepares financial
statements in accordance with ASPE, it would be a private
company, and its shares would not be actively traded. The fair
value of its common shares would likely not be more reliable
than the fair value of each asset, therefore the fair value of each
asset would be used to measure the acquisition cost of plant
assets acquired from Desbury Company.
c. Machinery..........................................................................
312,900
Repairs and Maintenance Expense.................................
12,500
Finance Expense..............................................................
6,100
Cash..........................................................................
331,500
LO 3,7 BT: AP Difficulty: S Time: 25 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.15
a. Equipment.........................................................................
682,342
Notes Payable.......................................................... 682,342
Using tables:
Present value of annuity @ 10% for 5 years
$180,000 X 3.79079 $682,342.20
Result: $682,341.62
January 2, 2024
Interest Payable................................................................
68,234
Notes Payable ($180,000 – $68,234)................................
111,766
Cash..........................................................................
180,000
January 2, 2025
Interest Payable................................................................
57,058
Notes Payable ($180,000 – $57,068)................................
122,942
Cash..........................................................................
180,000
d. Depreciation Expense1.....................................................
85,293
Accumulated Depreciation -
Equipment............................................................
85,293
1
($682,342 8)
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.16
a. 1. $30,000
2. $26,790
Using tables:
Present value of annuity @ 8% for 2 years
$600* X 1.78326 $1,069.96
Present value of a single payment @ 8% for 2 yrs.
$30,000 X .85734 25,720.20
*($30,000 x 2%) = $600 $26,790.16
Using a financial calculator:
PV ? Yields $26,790.12
I 8%
N 2
PMT $(600)
FV $(30,000)
Type 0
Result: $26,790.12
a. (continued)
3. $25,720
Using tables:
Present value of a single payment @ 8% for 2 yrs.
$30,000 X .85734 $25,720.20
Result: $25,720.16
A step-by-step solution for this section of the problem can be
found in the student resources section of the online course.
b. 8% interest-bearing note
09/01/23 Equipment.........................................................................
30,000
Notes Payable..........................................................
30,000
2% interest-bearing note
09/01/23 Equipment [part a.]...........................................................
26,790
Notes Payable..........................................................
26,790
b. (continued)
09/01/24 Interest Payable................................................................
200
4
Interest Expense ..............................................................
1,429
Notes Payable..........................................................
1,029
Cash ($30,000 X 2%)................................................600
4
($26,790 X 8% X 8/12)
Non-interest-bearing note
09/01/23 Equipment [part a.]...........................................................
25,720
Notes Payable..........................................................
25,720
b. (continued)
Notes Payable...................................................................
30,000
Cash..........................................................................
30,000
To record note repayment
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 40 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.17
Depreciation Expense1.....................................................
700
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment............... 700
1
($11,200 – $700 = $10,500;
$10,500 5 = $2,100;
$2,100 X 4/12 = $700)
To record depreciation expense to date of
exchange
Equipment (New)2.............................................................15,200
Accumulated Depreciation—Equipment........................ 7,000
3
Gain on Disposal of Equipment ............................ 1,000
Equipment (Old)....................................................... 11,200
Cash.......................................................................... 10,000
To record equipment exchange
3
Cost of old asset $11,200
Accum. depr. ($6,300 + $700) (7,000 )
Carrying amount 4,200
Fair market value of old asset (5,200 )
Gain on disposal of equipment $ 1,000
2
Cash paid $10,000
Fair value of old melter 5,200
Cost of new melter $15,200
EXERCISE 10.18
Stacey Limited:
Equipment (New)1.............................................................
28,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment........................ 31,250
Equipment (Old)....................................................... 50,000
Cash.......................................................................... 3,000
Gain on Disposal of Equipment2............................ 6,250
1 2
Valuation of new equipment: Calculation of
gain:
Fair value of $25,000 Fair value of old
equip. given equipment $25,000
Cash 3,000 Carrying value of
old equipment (18,750)
New equip. $28,000 Gain on disposal $ 6,250
Chokar Limited:
Cash ...................................................................................
3,000
Equipment (New)...............................................................
25,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment........................ 22,000
1
Loss on Disposal of Equipment ..................................... 5,000
Equipment (Old)....................................................... 55,000
1
Calculation of loss:
Carrying value of old $33,000
equipment
Fair value of old equipment 28,000
Loss on exchange $ 5,000
Stacey Limited:
Equipment (New)1.............................................................
21,750
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment........................ 31,250
Equipment (Old)....................................................... 50,000
Cash.......................................................................... 3,000
1
Valuation of new equipment:
Carrying value of old
equipment $18,750
Cash paid 3,000
New equipment $21,750
Chokar Limited:
Cash ...................................................................................
3,000
1
Equipment (New) .............................................................25,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Equipment......................... 22,000
2
Loss on Disposal of Equipment ..................................... 5,000
Equipment (Old)....................................................... 55,000
2
Fair value of new
equipment + cash $28,000
received ($3,000)
Carrying value of old
equipment (33,000)
Loss on disposal $ (5,000)
1
The new equipment cannot be recorded at cost exceeding its
fair value of $25,000.
EXERCISE 10.19
a. Equipment (New)1.............................................................
50,100
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment......................................................................
20,000
Equipment (Old)....................................................... 65,000
Cash..........................................................................5,100
1
Valuation of new equipment:
Cash $4,000
Installation cost
(cash) 1,100
Carrying value of
old equipment 45,000
New equipment $50,100
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.20
This is a nonmonetary transaction with commercial substance.
Both parties should record the transaction at fair value of what
was given up. Jamil has given up time valued at $650. Ralph
has given up time valued at $500. The two parties to the
transaction do not have to record the transaction at the same
amount and would likely not be aware of the exact fair value of
what they are receiving in exchange.
EXERCISE 10.21
a. and b.
Purchase price [($50,000 / $195,000) X $235,000] $60,256
Architectural drawings and engineering fees 18,000
Gutting of building 17,000
Construction 108,400
Provincial government grant1 (75,000)
Total cost $128,656
1
The government grant could alternately be shown as deferred
revenue and not be included as a reduction to the asset’s cost.
In this case, the cost would be $203,656.
a. & b. (continued)
Deferral method:
Depreciation expense = ($203,656 - $65,000)= $6,933
20 years
Amortization of deferred revenue to revenue
= $75,000 = (3,750 )
20 years
Net effect on income statement $3,183
Operating expenses:
Depreciation expense $3,183
c. (continued)
Deferral Method:
Lightstone Equipment Ltd.
Statement of Financial Position
August 31, 2024
Operating expenses:
Depreciation expense $6,933
Other revenues:
Revenue – Government Grants2 3,750
$3,183
1
The Deferred Government Grant could also be shown in
Long-term Liabilities.
2
The Revenue – Government Grants could also be shown
netted against Depreciation Expense.
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 25 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.22
a.
Under IFRS, separate standards for biological assets are set out
in IAS 41 Agriculture. IAS 41 defines a biological asset as a
living animal or plant; therefore, grapevines would be covered
by the standard and considered a biological asset. Biological
assets are measured initially, and at every date of the statement
of financial position, at fair value less costs to sell, with
changes in value recognized on the income statement as the
values change. IAS 41 does not mandate how costs associated
with the grapevines (i.e., the new grape trellis system) should
be accounted for. They could be capitalized as part of the
biological asset or expensed directly. As long as the
expenditures do not create assets that still exist at year end, the
net impact on the financial statements will be the same. The
carrying amount of the grapevines on the statement of financial
position at December 31, 2023 will be $295,000 – (4% X
$295,000) = $283,200, or fair value less costs to sell at that date.
b.
c.
EXERCISE 10.23
a.
Fixed Asset
PP&E (Fixed Average Fixed
Year Net Sales Turnover
Assets) Assets
Ratio
2021 $51,235,125 $5,025,135 - -
2022 52,235,125 6,044,892 $5,535,014 9.44
2023 48,235,125 6,523,489 6,284,191 7.68
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
2022 2023
LO 5 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001, cpa-t007 CM: Reporting and DAIS
EXERCISE 10.24
Carrying
Value
before Net
Cost adjustment Fair Value income
Year (millions) (millions) (millions) (loss)
2023 $50 $50 $50 $0
2024 50 60 10
2025 60 63 3
2026 63 58 (5)
b. Cost model
Depreciation Expense1.....................................................
2,000,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings.............................................................. 2,000,000
1
($50,000,000 – $10,000,000) ÷ 20)
LO 5 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.25
a.
The cost model in IAS 16 requires the asset to be depreciated
over its useful life using a method that corresponds to how
Nevine receives the economic benefits the asset offers. The
annual straight-line depreciation is calculated as follows:
b.
Because cost allocation and depreciation are not issues under
the fair value model, it is likely that Nevine would not separate
out the cost of the land from that of the building and its
components as indicated in the cost model allocation of
acquisition costs described in part a. Therefore, assume that
the investment property is in an account entitled Investment
Property—Shopping Centre carried at $10.8 million as at June 2,
2022.
On May 31, 2023, the property is written down to its fair value at
that date of $10,500,000. On May 31, 2024 and 2025, the asset
account is adjusted to $10,300,000 and $11,000,000,
respectively. Changes in the fair values are recognized in the
income statement and the property is reported on the statement
of financial position at its fair value at each statement of
financial position date. The following entries are made:
b. (continued)
EXERCISE 10.26
a.
Equipment ($90,000–$80,000)..........................................
10,000
Revaluation Surplus (OCI)...................................... 10,000
To adjust the Equipment account to fair value
b.
Depreciation Expense1.....................................................
13,750
Accumulated Depreciation – 13,750
Buildings..............................................................
1
($275,000 ÷ 20)
Depreciation Expense2.....................................................
11,250
Accumulated Depreciation – 11,250
Equipment...........................................................
2
($90,000 ÷ 8)
c.
Proportionate Method
Buildings:
Proportional
Before after
revaluation revaluation
(A) (B) (B) – (A)
Building $350,000 x 275/300 $320,833 $(29,167)
Accumulated
depreciation 50,000 x 275/300 45,833 (4,167)
Carrying amount $300,000 x 275/300 $275,000 $(25,000)
Equipment:
Proportional
Before after
revaluation revaluation
(A) (B) (B) – (A)
Equipment $120,000 x 90/80 $135,000 $15,000
Accumulated
depreciation 40,000 x 90/80 45,000 5,000
Carrying amount $ 80,000 x 90/80 $ 90,000 $10,000
c. (continued)
Equipment.........................................................................
15,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Equipment........................ 5,000
Revaluation Surplus (OCI)...................................... 10,000
To adjust the Equipment account to fair value
Depreciation Expense3.....................................................
13,750
Accumulated Depreciation – 13,750
Buildings..............................................................
3
($275,000 ÷ 20)
To record depreciation expense
Depreciation Expense4.....................................................
11,250
Accumulated Depreciation – 11,250
Equipment...........................................................
4
($90,000 ÷ 8)
To record depreciation expense
LO 5,9 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 20 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
EXERCISE 10.27
a.
December 31, 2023
Depreciation Expense1.....................................................
11,500
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings.............................................................. 11,500
1
($230,000 ÷ 20)
To record depreciation expense
b.
December 31, 2024
Depreciation Expense......................................................
11,500
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings.............................................................. 11,500
To record depreciation expense
c.
December 31, 2025
Depreciation Expense......................................................
11,500
Accumulated Depreciation –
Buildings.............................................................. 11,500
To record depreciation expense
d.
Effective January 1, 2026, the depreciation rate is adjusted to
reflect the change in the depreciable amount. The $205,000
January 1, 2026 carrying amount is now allocated over the
remaining 17 (20 – 3) years. The new rate, therefore, is $12,059
($205,000 ÷ 17) per year.
e.
December 31, 2027
Depreciation Expense......................................................
12,059
Accumulated Depreciation – 12,059
Buildings..............................................................
($205,000 ÷ (20 – 3))
f.
December 31, 2028
Depreciation Expense......................................................
12,059
Accumulated Depreciation – 12,059
Buildings..............................................................
f. (continued)
g.
Proportionate Method
Buildings...........................................................................
11,176
Accumulated Depreciation–
Buildings............................................................ 1,676
Revaluation Surplus (OCI)...................................... 9,500
g. (continued)
h. (Continued)
i
The revaluation model results in more relevant information on
the statement of financial position because the building is
revalued to fair value every three years. An investor may be
better able to assess the current economic position of the
company with this information. However, the revaluation model
increases the risk of error and bias in the financial statements
because the revaluation model uses a fair value amount that is
not necessarily supported by a transaction with commercial
substance.
EXERCISE 10.28
1. As the building was acquired in 1983, based on the
information in the question it does not appear that the
building has been recorded in the accounts in its
component parts, but rather grouped together in the
buildings account. Thus, the old roof was included in the
buildings account and must be removed from that
account. Since the building structure and the roof have
different remaining useful lives, they should be recorded
in separate accounts:
Buildings–Roof.................................................................
2,500,000
Cash..........................................................................
2,500,000
Purchase of new roof
Accumulated Depreciation—
Buildings1.......................................................................
800,000
Loss on Disposal of Buildings........................................
200,000
Buildings..................................................................
1,000,000
1
($1,000,000 X 40/50)
Disposal of old roof
Accumulated Depreciation -
Buildings...........................................................................
200,000
Buildings..................................................................
200,000
Disposal of old HVAC
EXERCISE 10.29
a.
1/30 Accumulated Depreciation—
Buildings1.....................................................................
112,200
2
Loss on Disposal of Buildings .......................................
24,900
Buildings..................................................................
132,000
Cash..........................................................................
5,100
1
(5% X $132,000 = $6,600; $6,600 X 17 = $112,200)
2
($132,000 – $112,200) + $5,100
3/10 Repairs and Maintenance Expense................................. 2,900
Cash..........................................................................
2,900
EXERCISE 10.30
a. C
b. E
c. C
d. C
e. C
f. C
g. C
h. E
i C
j. E or C if the company prepares financial statements in
accordance with ASPE; C if the company prepares
financial statements in accordance with IFRS (assuming
that the overhaul involves a substantial amount of time to
get the asset ready for its intended use, otherwise
expense).
k. C
l. C
LO 6 BT: K Difficulty: S Time: 15 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*EXERCISE 10.31
1
(Total expend. $510,000 – cost of land $150,000)
Total weighted-average accumulated expenditures $1,525,000
Less: financed by specific construction loan 3,000,000
Weighted-average accumulated expenditures
financed by general borrowings (cannot be less
than zero) $0
$680,000
Capitalization rate = = 12.14%
$5,600,000
a. (continued)
Avoidable costs on asset-specific debt
($1,525,0001 x 12%) $183,000
Avoidable costs on general debt
($0 x 12.14%) 0
Total avoidable borrowing costs $183,000
1
The asset-specific debt was $3,000,000, however the avoidable
interest cost is calculated by capping the debt at weighted-
average accumulated expenditures ($1,525,000 in this case).
The weighted expenditures are less than the amount of specific
borrowing; the specific borrowing rate is used.
b.
Actual interest paid during the year:
$3,000,000 X 12% $ 360,000
$4,000,000 X 13% 520,000
$1,600,000 X 10% 160,000
$1,040,000
b. (continued)
LO 2,8 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 25 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*EXERCISE 10.32
*EXERCISE 10.33
Step 3 (continued)
Calculation of capitalization rate on general borrowings:
Weighted
Principal debt Borrowing
amount Weight outstanding Cost
7% 10-year bonds,
issued June 15, 2017 $500,000 12/12 $500,000 $35,000
6% 12-year bonds,
issued May 1, 2023 300,000 8/12 200,000 12,000
9% 15-year bonds,
issued May 1, 2008,
matured May 1, 2023 300,000 4/12 100,000 9,000
$800,000 $56,000
$56,000
Capitalization rate = = 7%
$800,000
Avoidable borrowing costs on non-asset-specific debt
= $83,333 x 7% = $5,833
Problem 10.2
Problem 10.3
Problem 10.4
Problem 10.5
construction, and special tax assessments. A good problem for providing a broad
perspective as to the types of costs expensed and capitalized.
TIME AND PURPOSE OF PROBLEMS (CONTINUED)
Problem 10.6
Problem 10.7
Problem 10.8
Problem 10.9
Purpose—to provide the student with another problem involving the exchange of
productive assets. This problem is unusual because it involves the exchange of
two assets for inventory and the amount of the cash is less than 10%. As a
result, the entire transaction is nonmonetary in nature.
Problem 10.10
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem to apply the revaluation model
over multiple years with multiple classes of assets.
Problem 10.11
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem to apply the revaluation model,
and to compare and contrast the asset adjustment method with the proportionate
method. The preparation of a continuity schedule for all transactions from the
date of purchase are included in the instructions to this problem.
Problem 10.12
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem to apply the fair value model,
and to compare and contrast the fair value model with the cost model.
Problem 10.13
*Problem 10.14
*Problem 10.15
Purpose—to provide the student with a problem to calculate capitalized interest
and to present disclosures related to capitalized interest.
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS
PROBLEM 10.1
PROBLEM 10.2
b. (continued) – Transaction 1
Asset cost = Present value of the note + Freight + Installation
– Government Grant
Using tables:
Present value of annuity @ 10% for 4 years
($20,000 ÷ 4) X 3.16986 $15,849.30
Result: $15,849.33
b. (continued) – Transaction 1
b. (continued)
Although not required, the entry to record the exchange follows:
Machinery (New).................................................................
64,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery............................. 45,000
Machinery (Old)......................................................... 80,000
Cash.......................................................................... 25,000
Gain on Disposal of Machinery.................................. 4,000
PROBLEM 10.3
a. Golden Corporation
ANALYSIS OF LAND ACCOUNT
for 2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $ 310,000
Golden Corporation
ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS – STRUCTURE ACCOUNT
for 2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $ 883,000
Cost of new building constructed
on land site number 622
Construction costs $340,000
Excavation fees 38,000
Architectural design fees 15,000
Building permit fee 2,500 395,500
Balance at December 31, 2023 $1,278,500
a. (continued)
Golden Corporation
ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS – ROOF ACCOUNT
for 2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $ 0
Cost of new building constructed
on land site number 622
“Green roof”1 36,000
Balance at December 31, 2023 $36,000
1
The “green roof” requires a separate account from building structure
as it has a different useful life than the building. The “green roof” is
expected to require retrofitting every 7 years, so it must be
recognized separately from the remainder of the building.
Golden Corporation
ANALYSIS OF LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT
for 2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $705,000
Office space 89,000
Balance at December 31, 2023 $794,000
Golden Corporation
ANALYSIS OF EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT
for 2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $845,000
Cost of the new equipment acquired
Invoice price $111,000
Freight costs 3,300
Installation costs 3,600 117,900
Balance at December 31, 2023 $962,900
PROBLEM 10.4
a.
Webb Corporation
ANALYSIS OF LAND ACCOUNT
2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $300,000
Plant facility acquired from Knorman Corp.
- fair value of land (share-based payment) 230,000
Balance at December 31, 2023 $530,000
Webb Corporation
ANALYSIS OF LAND IMPROVEMENTS ACCOUNT
2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $140,000
Parking lots, streets, and sidewalks 95,000
Balance at December 31, 2023 $235,000
Webb Corporation
ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS ACCOUNT
2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $1,100,000
Plant facility acquired from Knorman
Corp. —fair value of building (share-based
payment) 690,000
Balance at December 31, 2023 $1,790,000
Webb Corporation
ANALYSIS OF EQUIPMENT ACCOUNT
2023
Balance at January 1, 2023 $ 960,000
Cost of new equipment acquired
Invoice price $400,000
Freight and unloading costs 13,000
Provincial sales taxes 28,000
Installation costs 26,000 467,000
$1,427,000
Deduct cost of equipment disposed of
Equipment scrapped June 30, 2023
(item 5) 80,000*
Equipment sold July 1, 2023 (item 6) 44,000* 124,000
Balance at December 31, 2023 $1,303,000
b. Items that were not used to determine the answer to a. above are
as follows:
1. The tract of land, which was acquired for $150,000 as a
potential future building site, should be included on
Webb’s statement of financial position as an investment in
land with a non-current classification.
b. (continued)
Schedule 2
Loss on Scrapping of Equipment
June 30, 2023
b. (continued)
Schedule 3
Accumulated Depreciation Using
Double-Declining-Balance Method
June 30, 2023
(Double-declining-balance rate is 20%)
Carrying Value
at Beginning of Depreciation Accumulated
Year Year Expense Depreciation
2015 $80,000 $16,000 $16,000
2016 64,000 12,800 28,800
2017 51,200 10,240 39,040
2018 40,960 8,192 47,232
2019 32,768 6,554 53,786
2020 26,214 5,243 59,029
2021 20,971 4,194 63,223
2022 16,777 3,355 66,578
2023 (6 months) 13,422 1,342 67,920
$67,920
Schedule 4
Loss on Disposal of Equipment
July 1, 2023
Cost, January 1, 2020 $44,000
Depreciation (straight-line method, salvage value
of $2,000, 7-year life) January 1, 2020, to
July 1, 2023 [3½ years X ($44,000 – $2,000) 7] (21,000)
Asset carrying value July 1, 2023 $23,000
PROBLEM 10.5
Schedule C
Depreciation expense recorded $ 4,060
Depreciation that should be recorded
for the Buildings – Structure
(1.0% X $116,860)2 (1,169)
Depreciation that should be recorded
for the Buildings – HVAC
(2.5% X $30,000)3 (750)
Depreciation expense reduction $ 2,141
2
useful life is 50 years, 1/50 years = 2.0%
2.0%X 6/12 = 1.0%
3
useful life is 20 years, 1/20 years = 5% 5.0%
X 6/12 = 2.5%
LO 2,3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 35 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
PROBLEM 10.6
a. Kerr Corp.
Cost of Buildings
Conservative approach
Fixed-price contract (original) $1,300,000
Plans, specifications, and blueprints 25,000
Architect’s fees 82,000
Upgrading of windows 46,000
Internal direct labour and materials 67,000
Variable overhead based on direct labour hours 10,000
Less: Municipal government grant (36,000)
Cost of Buildings $1,494,000
This is different from the IFRS standards, where borrowing costs are
more widely defined as “interest and other costs that an entity incurs
in connection with the borrowing of funds” (ASPE limits capitalization
to interest costs), and IFRS requires capitalization of borrowing costs
of qualifying assets (ASPE allows a choice between capitalization
and expensing).
b. Kerr Corp.
Cost of Buildings
“Increased Income” approach
Fixed-price contract (original) $1,300,000
Plans, specifications, and blueprints 25,000
Architect’s fees 82,000
Upgrading of windows 46,000
Internal direct labour and materials 67,000
Variable overhead based on direct labour hours 10,000
Allocated cost of executive time1 54,000
Interest cost on building construction 63,000
Interest cost on maintenance building construction 3,200
Less: Municipal government grant (36,000)
Cost of Buildings $1,614,200
1
In order to report increased income, the accountant would include
certain expenditures in the cost of the building, rather than expensing
them directly. For example, interest costs on self-construction of the
building and maintenance building may be capitalized. Generally,
only directly attributable costs are capitalized, and no fixed overhead
is charged to a PP&E asset account. However, if there were fixed
costs that could be considered directly attributable to construction,
due to the increased activity, the capitalization of some fixed
overhead costs is permitted. For example, if the executive in charge
of construction had to hire an additional person to take on some other
responsibilities usually carried out by the executive because so much
of his or her time was taken up with construction, a case could be
made to capitalize part of the executive’s cost. The calculations
above assume a case can be made in this situation.
c. (continued)
PROBLEM 10.7
a.
1. Land 623,333
Buildings 311,667
Common Shares1 900,000
Cash 35,000
1
The market value of the assets is the most clearly determined
value of the shares issued in exchange.
a. (continued)
2. (continued)
Using tables:
Present value of an annuity @ 12% for 2 yrs.
$5,000 X 1.69005 $8,450.25
Using a financial calculator:
PV ? Yields $8,450.26
I 12%
N 2
PMT $(5,000)
FV $0
Type 0
Result: $8,450.26
a. (continued)
3. Machinery3 50,000
Cash 50,000
3
If the information was available, the original cost of the old
motor and the related accumulated depreciation would have
been removed from the accounts as the asset has been
retired and is no longer in use.
4. Land 35,995
4
Buildings 97,005
5
Prepaid Expenses 250
Prepaid Insurance 940
Cash 134,190
5
($1,000 X 3/12) Property tax after Sept. 30
$68,000
$126,650 X = $90,655 Buildings
$95,000
4
Calculation of cost of building:
Building cost $90,655
Reshingling roof 2,200
Hauling refuse 230
Cleaning outside walls and windows 750
Painting inside walls 3,170
Total cost $ 97,005
a. (continued)
5. Repairs and Maintenance Expense 35,000
Cash 35,000
PROBLEM 10.8
a.
1. Chesley Corporation
Cash 23,000
Machinery (New) 69,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery 50,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery1 18,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
1
Calculation of loss: Carrying value $110,000
Fair value (92,000)
Loss $ 18,000
Secord Company
Machinery (New) 92,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery 45,000
2
Loss on Disposal of Machinery 6,000
Cash 23,000
Machinery (Old) 120,000
2
Calculation of loss: Carrying value $ 75,000
Fair value (69,000)
Loss $ 6,000
2. Chesley Corporation
Machinery (New)3 92,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 50,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery 18,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
3
the new machinery cannot be recorded at a cost higher than its
fair value.
a. (continued)
2. (continued)
Bateman Company
Machinery (New) 76,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 71,000
Machinery (Old) 147,000
3. Chesley Corporation
Machinery (New) 4 100,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 50,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery 18,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
Cash 8,000
4
the new machinery cannot be recorded at a cost higher than its
fair value.
Shripad Company
Machinery (New) 77,000
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery 75,000
Cash 8,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
a. (continued)
4. Chesley Corporation
Machinery (New) ($92,000 + $93,000) 185,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 50,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery 18,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
Cash 93,000
Ansong Corporation
Cash 93,000
Inventory (Used) 92,000
Sales Revenue 185,000
To record sale with trade-in
Chesley Corporation
Machinery (New) 92,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 50,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery5 18,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
5
Calculation of loss: Carrying value $110,000
Fair value (92,000)
Loss $ 18,000
b. (continued)
Bateman Company
Machinery (New) 92,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 71,000
Gain on Disposal of Machinery 16,000
Machinery (Old) 147,000
Chesley Corporation
Machinery (New) 100,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 50,000
Loss on Disposal of Machinery 18,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
Cash 8,000
Shripad Company
Machinery (New) 92,000
Accumulated Depreciation - Machinery 75,000
Cash 8,000
Gain on Disposal of Machinery6 15,000
Machinery (Old) 160,000
6
Calculation of gain: Fair value $100,000
Carrying value (85,000)
Gain $15,000
LO 3 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 40 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
PROBLEM 10.9
a. Garrison Books
1. Equipment (new) 198,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment (Crane #6RT) 15,000
Accumulated Depreciation –
Equipment (Crane #S79) 18,000
Loss on Disposal of Equipment1 1,500
Cash 17,500
Equipment (Crane #6RT) 130,000
Equipment (Crane #S79) 120,000
1
Calculation of Loss on Disposal:
Fair value of Crane #6RT $128,000
Carrying value of Crane #6RT (115,000)
Gain $13,000
Pisani Books
2. Inventory (Used) 215,500
Sales Revenue 198,000
Cash 17,500
To record sale with trade-in
b. Garrison Books
2
1. Equipment (New) 198,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment (Crane #6RT) 15,000
Accumulated Depreciation—
Equipment (Crane #S79) 18,000
Loss on Disposal of Equipment 1,500
Cash 17,500
Equipment (Crane #6RT) 130,000
Equipment (Crane #S79) 120,000
2
Carrying amount of the assets given up = $217,000 [($130,000 –
$15,000) + ($120,000 - $18,000)]; however, the fair value of the asset
plus cash acquired of $215,500 ($198,000 + $17,500) is less than
that amount. Therefore, a loss is recognized for the difference
between carrying amount of the assets given up and fair value of the
assets acquired. The same entry as part a. is recorded.
Pisani Books
2. Inventory (Used) 182,500
Inventory 165,000
Cash 17,500
PROBLEM 10.10
a.
Depreciation Expense1........................................................
20,000
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #1)......................... 20,000
1
($400,000 ÷ 10 x 1/2)
To record depreciation on Building #1
Depreciation Expense2........................................................
10,500
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #2)......................... 10,500
2
($210,000 ÷ 10 x 1/2)
To record depreciation on Building #2
Depreciation Expense3........................................................
12,500
Acc. Depn. – Machinery (Building #1)....................... 12,500
3
($75,000 ÷ 3 x 1/2)
To record depreciation on Machinery in Building #1
Depreciation Expense4........................................................
2,500
Acc. Depn. – Machinery (Building #2)....................... 2,500
4
($45,000 ÷ 9 x 1/2)
To record depreciation on Machinery in Building #2
a. (continued)
Depreciation Expense5........................................................
40,737
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #1)......................... 40,737
5
($387,000 ÷ 9.5 years)
To record depreciation on Building #1
Depreciation Expense6........................................................
18,737
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #2)......................... 18,737
6
($178,000 ÷ 9.5 years)
To record depreciation on Building #2
Depreciation Expense7........................................................
25,000
Acc. Depn. – Machinery (Building #1)....................... 25,000
7
($75,000 ÷ 3)
To record depreciation on Machinery in Building #1
a. (continued)
Depreciation Expense8........................................................
5,000
Acc. Depn. – Machinery (Building #2)....................... 5,000
8
($45,000 ÷ 9)
To record depreciation on Machinery in Building #2
b.
Same as part a.
Depreciation Expense9........................................................
20,000
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #1)......................... 20,000
9
($400,000 ÷ 10 x 1/2)
To record depreciation on Building #1
b. (continued)
Depreciation Expense10......................................................
10,500
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #2)......................... 10,500
10
($210,000 ÷ 10 x 1/2)
To record depreciation on Building #2
Depreciation Expense11......................................................
40,737
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #1)......................... 40,737
11
($387,000 ÷ 9.5 years)
To record depreciation on Building #1
Depreciation Expense12......................................................
18,737
Acc. Depn. – Buildings (Building #2)......................... 18,737
12
($178,000 ÷ 9.5 years)
To record depreciation on Building #2
b. (continued)
c.
Where revaluations are made on an asset-by-asset basis 2023:
Revaluation Gain or Loss $21,500
PROBLEM 10.11
a. Asset Adjustment Method
Machine #1
Depreciation Expense1........................................................
51,667
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery
(Machine #1)......................................................... 51,667
1
$310,000 ÷ 6 remaining years
To record depreciation expense (Machine #1)
a. (continued)
Machine #2
Depreciation Expense4........................................................
46,316
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery
(Machine #2)......................................................... 46,316
4
$440,000 ÷ 9.5 years
To record depreciation expense (Machine #2)
b. Proportionate Method
December 31, 2023
Machine #1
Depreciation Expense7........................................................
51,667
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery
(Machine #1)......................................................... 51,667
7
$310,000 ÷ 6 years
To record depreciation expense (Machine #1)
Proportional
Before after
revaluation revaluation
(A) (B) (B) – (A)
Machine #1 $413,333 x 230/206.666 $460,000 $46,667
Accumulated
depreciation 206,6678 x 230/206.666 230,000 23,333
Carrying amount $206,666 x 230/206.666 $230,000 $23,334
8 *
[$103,333 + ($51,667 X 2)] adjusted for rounding
Machine #2
Depreciation Expense9........................................................
46,316
Accumulated Depreciation – Machinery
(Machine #2)......................................................... 46,316
9
$440,000 ÷ 9.5 years
To record depreciation expense (Machine #2)
Solutions Manual 10.148 Chapter 10
Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. Unauthorized copying, distribution, or transmission of this page is strictly prohibited.
Kieso, Weygandt, Warfield, Wiecek, McConomy Intermediate Accounting, Thirteenth Canadian Edition
b. (continued)
Proportional
Before after
revaluation X 328,000 revaluation
(A) / 347,368 (B) (B) – (A)
Machine #2 $555,789 $524,800 $(30,989)
Accumulated
depreciation 208,42110 196,800 (11,621)
Carrying amount $347,368 $328,000 $(19,368)
10
$115,789 + $46,316 X 2
d.
e.
f.
A potential investor would likely prefer that Camco use the
proportionate method to apply the revaluation method, because
the proportionate method provides additional useful and relevant
information. Presenting an adjusted balance in the accumulated
depreciation account provides information about the relative age of
the asset, and allows the potential investor to assess when assets
may need to be replaced. Presenting a zero balance in the
accumulated depreciation account, as under the asset adjustment
method, does not give this type of information.
LO 5 BT: AP Difficulty: C Time: 55 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
PROBLEM 10.12
March 1, 2023
Investment Property............................................................
1,275,000
Cash.......................................................................... 1,275,000
b. Cost model
March 1, 2023
Buildings (Investment Property) (75%)............................... 956,250
Land (25%).........................................................................
318,750
Cash.......................................................................... 1,275,000
b. (continued)
c.
d.
e.
An investor in Jessi should be aware that the fair value amount that is
applied in the fair value model requires a degree of professional
judgement in calculation and application, and that the determination
of fair value can have a material effect on the statement of financial
position as well as the income statement.
PROBLEM 10.13
(5) See discussion in (4) above. In this case, because the useful
life of the asset has increased, under ASPE, a debit to
accumulated depreciation would appear to be the most
appropriate choice.
LO 6 BT: C Difficulty: M Time: 35 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
(6)
*PROBLEM 10.14
a. 2023 2024
Land (Schedule 1) $192,000 $192,000
Buildings 34,8751 720,2192
Interest expense 3,125 34,656
1
$30,000 (architectural fees) + $3,000 (building permits) + $1,875
(2023 capitalized interest)
2
$34,875 (2023 capitalized building cost) + $240,000 (Mar. 1) +
$360,000 (May 1) + $60,000 (July 1) + $25,344 (2024 capitalized
interest)
3
$3,000 for building permits
a. (continued)
b.
2023 2024
Land $192,000 $192,000
5
Buildings 33,000 693,000 6
Interest expense 5,000 60,000
5
$30,000 (architectural fees) + $3,000 (building permits)
6
$33,000 (2023 capitalized building cost) + $240,000 (Mar. 1) +
$360,000 (May 1) + $60,000 (July 1)
c.
IFRS ASPE Difference
2023 2024 2023 2024 2023 2024
$34,87 $720,21 $33,00 $693,00 $1,8 $27,21
Buildings 5 9 0 0 75 9
Interest 3,1 60,00 (1,87 (25,34
Expense 25 34,656 5,000 0 5) 4)
The amounts of the differences are very likely not material to the
statement of income or the statement of financial position. The size of
the interest expense difference needs to be compared to all
expenses, and buildings need to be compared to all of the assets.
The building difference in 2024 is 3.9% of the building cost and would
likely be minimal as a % of all assets.
d.
If Inglewood pays for the construction with internally generated funds,
Inglewood will incur an opportunity cost of using the funds for
construction, and the company will forego the opportunity to invest
the funds elsewhere. This opportunity cost would not be recorded in
the financial statements. Compared to paying for the construction
with internally generated funds, the borrowing of funds for
construction and capitalization of borrowing costs will result in higher
total assets in the periods beginning in the year of construction,
higher debt, and higher depreciation expense in the periods after
construction is complete.
LO 7,8 BT: AP Difficulty: M Time: 30 min. AACSB: None CPA: cpa-t001 CM: Reporting
*PROBLEM 10.15
Expenditures Weighted-
Capita- Average
Date Amount X lization = Accumulated
Period Expenditures
July 30/23 $1,200,000 10/12 $1,000,000
Jan. 30/24 1,500,000 4/12 500,000
May 31/24 1,000,000 0 0
June 30/24 1,300,000 0 0
$5,000,000 $1,500,000
b. Weighted-Average
Accumulated Capitalization Avoidable
Expenditures X Rate = interest
$1,500,000 13%1 $195,000
Principal Interest
1
14½% five-year note (12/12) $2,000,000 $290,000
12% ten-year bond (12/12) 3,000,000 360,000
$5,000,000 $650,000
c. 1. and 2.
CASES
See the Case Primer on the Student Website as well as the summary case
primer in the front of the text.
Case Overview:
CA 10.1 RE (CONTINUED)
INTEGRATED CASES
Note that this case is adapted from a CPA Canada case. The solution has been
changed and updated to reflect this adaptation.
Certain financial reporting issues have arisen with our audit of Atlantic
Explorations Limited (AEL). Please find enclosed a summary of these issues and
subsequent recommendations.
Overview
The various stakeholders’ needs, and biases are listed below:
The group of 10 will want information regarding their investment. Iskra /
Colin will want the statements to positively reflect the business
decisions that have been made in their role as the executive
management team.
New investors will want to determine if AEL is a good investment,
particularly since AEL is looking to raise $1.5 million. AEL has a bias
towards making the statements look good in order to attract new
financing.
The bank is interested in AEL’s ability to repay its outstanding loan.
Therefore, there may be a bias towards reflecting AEL’s ability to do
this within the statements.
The government will want to determine the royalty value on treasure
found and needs fair value information. Note that the higher the fair
value, the higher the royalties. There may be a bias toward valuing the
treasure more conservatively. The government also wants to assess
the viability of AEL when determining whether to provide additional
grants.
Iskra and Colin will use the statements in order to assess company
performance. Specifically, to determine whether the company is
profitable and has sufficient cash flows.
GAAP is likely a constraint since the users want information that is relevant and
representationally faithful. The company needs to decide whether to use ASPE
or IFRS. The analysis provides options under ASPE and IFRS. Differences
between ASPE and IFRS are highlighted.
Issue: The revenue cycle of the salvage operations for this business is long term.
As a result, management has revenue recognition accounting policy choices
related to the salvage operations.
% Completion method Completed Contract Zero profit method
- There is a continuous - It is difficult to measure the - Under IFRS the company
earnings process that is percentage completed. may use the percentage
made up of multiple - Items may never be found of completion or zero-
significant performance or recovered. profit method.
obligations, including - This method is - If the outcome of the
locating the item, conservative and does not salvage operation is not
determining whether it is reflect the activities as determinable, the
likely to be retrieved, they are being performed, company would
and the retrieval itself. although, it does reflect recognize recoverable
- This treatment reflects the risky nature of the revenues up to costs
when work is performed. business. incurred, which results in
- Revenues are - This option is only allowed zero profits.
recognized earlier, which under ASPE. - Since the last payment is
recognizes profit earlier. not recoverable unless
- Earlier recognition is the items are salvaged,
acceptable, since the this might be the
recovered vessel preferred accounting
remains in the policy.
possession of the - This would have the
company until all impact of recognizing
amounts are paid. There zero profits in the early
is only uncertainty if stages of the contract.
items are not recovered. Therefore, this is more
- The company could use conservative and
historical information to transparent since it
assess the likelihood of reflects the riskiness
recoverability if feasible. associated with salvage
- Collectibility is not an operations.
issue for the first two
payments since both are
paid before the end of
the contract.
Recommendation:
It is important to first determine whether ASPE or IFRS will be followed. This will
determine which of the revenue reporting options are acceptable. Given the
information currently available, the zero profit method may be preferable as
discussed above.
Issue: The revenue cycle of the treasure hunting operations for this business is
speculative. As a result, management has a revenue recognition accounting
policy choice to make.
Issue: The company incurs significant exploration costs. Given the long-term
nature and uncertainty regarding the potential revenue related to the salvage and
treasure hunting operations, the company must decide whether to expense or
capitalize these costs.
Expense Capitalize
- Similar to mining companies, - The company could capitalize these
there is a large level of costs, since the costs are directly
uncertainty related to future incurred to find treasure.
benefits. There are significant - The word treasure by definition has
upfront costs related to these value and is potentially saleable.
activities. - The company has already found some
- There is uncertainty regarding treasure; therefore, costs are
future benefits. Specifically, can recoverable.
the company find, retrieve, and - Management must prove that the
then sell items for more than expenditures meet the definition of an
cost. asset. Specifically, there are future
- It is difficult to determine the benefits and the company can control /
value of treasure and whether access the resources in place. Note that
the company can recover it. management may be able to argue there
Additionally, finding a buyer may are future benefits, since they have
be difficult, given these are buyers. Additionally, management may
unique items and there may not argue that they have control / access,
be any market. since they have permits and expertise
- The company may not be able to from salvage operations.
raise enough funds to bring the - The company will have to ensure that all
treasure to the surface. costs deferred are recoverable.
- Expensing costs may be more - The company may wish to consider
transparent, as it reflects the whether the “Successful Efforts” method
higher risk. The company may typically used for Oil and Gas exploration
want to segregate different types might apply. AEL would initially capitalize
of operations on the statements exploration search costs until the search
so that these costs do not activities for each area are complete. If
eliminate the profit on the the search/treasure hunt activities are
salvage operations. not successful, the costs would be
written off to expense. Alternatively, for
successful efforts, the costs would
remain capitalized as an asset until
salvage operations of the “wreck and its
treasures” occurs and related
amortization begins.
Case Overview
OG Limited is an exploration and development company with several wells in
production. Therefore, the company is very capital intensive. Its shares trade on
the London Stock Exchange (LSE); requiring OG to use IFRS. This is a reporting
constraint. Also, management has stock options; this may create a bias to make
the company appear more profitable. It is the auditor’s role to ensure
transparency.
Issue: An exploded well has resulted in an oil spill that OG has committed to
cleaning up.
Accrue the liability Disclose only
- The cleanup costs are estimated to - Since the cleanup costs are
be between $5 million and $10 million. estimated to range anywhere between
Therefore, the cost is measurable and $5 million and $10 million, the costs
the expected value can be used. are difficult to measure with any
- This is a constructive obligation meaningful accuracy.
since the company announced that it
will take responsibility for the cleanup.
- This provides more transparency.
Recommendation and Reason – OG should accrue the costs, since it appears
that the costs are measurable and likely to be incurred.
IC 10.2 OG (CONTINUED)
Issue: Even though OG is taking responsibility for the cleanup related to the oil
spill, the farmers have filed a class action lawsuit for $100 million.
Accrue the liability Disclose only
- OG’s lawyers estimate that the - Given that OG is being sued for 10X
lawsuit can be settled at 10% of the value that lawyers estimate for
the value of the entire suit settlement, the actual value of the
brought forward. OG may use obligation is difficult to measure.
this expected value as a
measurement of the obligation.
- A constructive obligation exists,
since OG has accepted
responsibility for the spill and
has agreed to clean it up.
- This provides more
transparency.
Recommendation and Reason - OG should accrue the costs, since it appears
that the costs are measurable and likely to be incurred.
Issue: The company currently capitalizes the costs for searching and finding new
wells, regardless of whether the activities result in a new oil or gas producing well
being discovered.
Capitalize Expense
- Capitalizing the costs is - OG should expense the dry wells,
consistent with the full cost since they do not meet the definition
method where all costs to find of an asset. There is no future
wells – even dry holes – are economic benefit.
necessary to find the productive - This is consistent with the successful
wells. Capitalize all the costs efforts approach, where companies
incurred to get asset ready for initially capitalize exploration costs
use. until the drilling activities for each oil
- These are all direct costs, since field are complete. If the drilling
OG could not find the activities are not successful and no
productive wells without digging proven reserves are found, the costs
and searching. are written off to expense as a “dry
- This approach provides more hole.” Alternatively, for activities that
transparency since it shows the are likely to be commercially
true cost of running the developed, the costs remain
business. capitalized as an asset until
production begins.
IC 10.2 OG (CONTINUED)
Other Considerations:
- Is the well impaired given the identified problems in the case? If so, how
should its value be measured?
- Should an asset retirement obligation (ARO) be recognized given the
company’s assertion that it will make efforts to restore site? Has this
created a constructive obligation?
- If an ARO is recognized, how should it be measured?
The growth in fixed asset, right-of-use assets and intangible asset additions
substantially outpaced the growth in sales. As a company that operates on
the model of software as a service, the more customers the business has,
the more infrastructure (computer hardware and software) is needed to
support a growing and larger customer base. The large acquisition of
intangible assets came from the purchase of two other companies, Prana
Consulting and Rubikloud Technologies. These acquisitions provided the
company with customer relationships and artificial intelligence technology.
The company expects that these two acquisitions will allow it to provide
additional and broader services to its customers and should result in
increased revenues in the future. It makes sense that Kinaxis is investing at a
higher rate in fixed assets if it is anticipating additional growth in its customer
base. As an investor, these acquisitions should be viewed as an investment
in future earnings generation.
Note 2 outlines the valuation method used on the presumption that fair
values can be measured for the biological assets Stora holds. Forest
assets are valued based on using the discounted cash flow model
assuming sustainable continuing operations and estimating for growth for
one growth cycle. Note 12 states the yearly harvest rates are estimated
based on growth rates and multiplied by the actual wood prices. Costs for
harvesting and fertilizer are deducted to determine net annual cash flows.
The biological assets’ fair values are measured as “the present value of
the harvest from one growth cycle based on the productive forestland.”
Note 2 – Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgements, outlines in more
detail the types of estimates required including growth, harvest, selling
prices, and costs.
There are 14 KPIs. Five are listed as achieved (35.7% of total), three are
listed as in progress (21.4% of total), and the remaining are not yet
achieved (42.9% of total). While it appears that Stora Enso is making
great progress, there is still a significant amount of work to do to meet
these objectives.
Note 2 (g) indicates that BAM has the following types of operating tangible
capital assets:
Investment properties
Property, plant, and equipment
Renewable power assets (dams, penstocks, powerhouses,
hydroelectric generating units, wind generating units, solar generating
units, gas-fired cogenerating units, and other assets)
Infrastructure assets, including utilities, transport, midstream and data
assets (buildings, transmission stations and towers, leasehold
improvements, plant and equipment, network systems, track, district
energy systems, pipelines, and gas storage assets)
o Includes sustainable resources (land use in the production of
standing timber, bridges and roads used in sustainable
resources production)
Hospitality assets
Private Equity
b.
Type of asset Accounting model used
Investment properties Fair value
c.
The company also records fair value adjustments on its sustainable resources
accounted for using the fair value model. Note 7 shows that the company’s
sustainable resources in timberlands and other agricultural assets had $2 million
in fair value adjustments in 2020.
For those measured using the revaluation model or the cost/amortized cost
model: depreciation expense is recognized as an expense in net income.
To provide some indication about the significance of the effects of the above on
the components of comprehensive income, note the following:
The $7,500 in costs to get the asset in place and ready for use should be
capitalized as part of the cost of the machine. This is justified because the
primary purpose in accounting for plant asset costs is to allocate the cost the
asset, which includes the cost of getting the asset ready for use, over the period
of time during which the benefits are being received from the use of the asset.
Therefore, both the $40,000 asset cost and the $7,500 installation cost should
be matched against the revenue generated by the use of this asset over its
useful life.
Although it may be true that these installation costs will not be recovered if the
machine were to be sold, this is not relevant since the machine was acquired to
be used, not sold. Assuming the asset has no salvage value at the end of its
useful life and there is approximately equal use of the machine every year for the
next 10 years, the owner could allocate $4,750 (10% of $47,500) against each
year’s operations as depreciation. However, if the owner’s suggestion of
expensing the $7,500 was followed, during the first year that asset is owned the
income statement would reflect $11,500 ($7,500 plus 10% of $40,000) in
expenses related to this asset. The following nine years would only reflect a
depreciation expense of $4,000 per year. This would result in an overstatement
of expenses by $6,750 in year one and an understatement of expenses by $750
per year for the subsequent nine years. This is not a proper matching of revenue
and expenses.
1. The $7,500 is not a proper deduction under federal income tax regulations,
since the tax rules are similar to GAAP and require these costs to be included in
the capital cost of the machine. If the $7,500 were incorrectly deducted in the
year of acquisition, and a subsequent correction were made in a later year upon
review of the return, additional tax plus interest and penalties would be incurred.
2. Even if the $7,500 could be deducted in the first year, there would be no total
tax savings over the entire life of the asset, unless the tax rates applicable to the
business were reduced during the following years. There is some value to taking
the $7,500 deduction right now because of the time value of money. If the
taxable income rates increased, there would be an increase in total taxes
payable, due to higher rates applicable during the period when the equivalent
depreciation deductions (capital cost allowance) would be reduced. However,
GAAP is not determined by income tax effects. In many instances, private entity
ASPE requires different accounting treatment for an item than the Income Tax
Act does.
2. Assuming that the $7,500 could be deducted for tax purposes in the first year,
this would not impact the accounting for the machine under GAAP. GAAP is not
determined by income tax effects. In many instances, private entity ASPE
requires different accounting treatment for an item than the Income Tax Act does.
An example of this is depreciation expense; the Income Tax Act requires the use
of capital cost allowance where the method and rate are pre-determined. Under
GAAP, companies can select the depreciation methods and estimate the useful
life and residual values.
Memo
To: Hotel Resort Limited Board of Directors
Subject: Government Forgivable Loan and Student Costs Grant
There are two types of government assistance that the federal government has
agreed to provide the company. Each type will be discussed separately since the
accounting treatment will be different.
Option 1
The cost reduction method would record the $50 million against the cost of the
facility construction upon receipt from the federal government. This would result
in a net asset cost of $650 million ($700 million - $50 million), which would then
be depreciated over the useful life of the asset.
This would result in less depreciation being recorded each year, when compared
to an asset constructed with no government funding. This treatment has the
effect of reducing total assets, reducing operating expenses, and increasing net
income over the life of the asset.
Option 2
The deferral method would record the $50 million as deferred revenue on the
statement of financial position. This deferred revenue would be amortized to
income over the life of the asset, thereby also increasing net income over the life
of the asset. The related asset would be recorded at $700 million and
depreciated over its useful life. In this case, the amortization of the deferred
revenue could either be recorded as a reduction of the depreciation expense or
as a separate component of income.
Both methods result in the same amount of net income. The difference between
the methods relates to the presentation on the balance sheet. The related note
disclosure for the cost reduction method would be as follows:
The federal government of Canada has granted financial assistance in the form
of a forgivable loan for the construction of a tourist facility in Yellowknife. A loan
totalling $50 million has been advanced and will be forgiven provided the full
amount is used to construct the facility, the resort is in operation for 15 years,
and the resort is not sold within this time period. The company has recorded the
government assistance as a reduction of the capital cost of the resort facilities.
If the grant is recorded as deferred revenue, the note would read as follows:
The federal government of Canada has granted financial assistance in the form
of a forgivable loan for the construction of a tourist facility in Yellowknife. A loan
totalling $50 million has been advanced and will be forgiven provided the full
amount is used to construct the facility, the resort is in operation for 15 years,
and the resort is not sold within this time period. The company has recorded the
government assistance as deferred revenue and amortizes the amount to income
over the useful life of the related resort asset.
The federal government of Canada has granted financial assistance in the form
of an annual government grant to cover 70% of the payroll and room and board
costs for 50 summer students. The company is required to hire and pay these
students for four months on a full-time basis. During the year, the company
received money, which has been recorded as a reduction of the related payroll
and accommodation costs for these students.
LEGAL NOTICE
Copyright © 2022 by John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd. or related companies. All
rights reserved.
The data contained in these files are protected by copyright. This manual is
furnished under licence and may be used only in accordance with the terms of
such licence.
MMXXI xii F1