🚀 Đề bài

Some people think the government should invest more money in teaching
science than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To
what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that more national funding should be allocated to the
teaching of science subjects rather than other subjects because these disciplines
could facilitate the growth of a country. This essay strongly disagrees with this
opinion, asserting that a strong and flourishing country results from a
combination of both humanities and science subjects.

There are valid reasons why some advocate for prioritizing science education.
In the current technological landscape, science has paved the way for numerous
breakthroughs that drive a country's development. For instance, America is
renowned as a technological powerhouse, home to numerous tech giants such as
Apple and Google. Such achievements are largely the result of massive
investments in science and technology within their educational system.
Similarly, countries such as China and Germany have also experienced
remarkable growth due to similar investments in these fields. Therefore, it is
undeniable that science significantly contributes to national development.

However, for a country to experience holistic development and long-term

prosperity, humanities should also be invested in, with history being a prime
example. When citizens are knowledgeable about their homeland’s origins and
the endeavors of previous generations to unify the country, they develop a sense
of patriotism. This patriotism is the foundation of the desire and effort to build
and develop a country. Conversely, when people are ignorant about their
country's history and have little gratitude towards the past, it is challenging for
them to devote themselves to their homeland, potentially leading to issues like
brain drain. Moreover, teaching international historical events is equally crucial.
Insights into world wars or conflicts occurring in other parts of the world help
people, especially young generations, understand the value of peace, which is
another essential groundwork for a developed and united country. Such
knowledge can bolster people’s faith in their home country and encourage them
to dedicate themselves to its development and protection. Humanities subjects
like literature and philosophy also play a vital role in fostering critical thinking,
empathy, and ethical reasoning, all of which are essential for well-rounded
citizens.

In conclusion, while it is true that science and technology are vital for a
country's progress, this essay argues that educational funding should not be
disproportionately channeled into these fields at the expense of the humanities.
A balanced approach that values both scientific and social subjects is crucial for
fostering patriotism, critical thinking, and a comprehensive understanding of the
world, which collectively form the foundation of a country's growth.

🚀 Đề bài

In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store

knowledge on the internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the
disadvantages?

In the past, valuable knowledge was predominantly stored in books. However,

with the advent of modern technology, people now utilize the Internet as a
primary repository for knowledge. This essay argues that the advantages of this
shift significantly outweigh the disadvantages.

On one hand, the transition to online knowledge storage presents certain

challenges with the most significant being the risk of plagiarism and
information theft. Regarding the former, the ease of copying and altering
content online can lead to widespread academic dishonesty. An example of this
is how many students misuse readily available resources to produce work that is
not their own, undermining academic integrity. In terms of information
circulation, unauthorized distribution of intellectual property poses another
serious concern. Books and academic papers are often shared without the
author's consent, infringing on intellectual property rights and negatively
impacting authors' revenue. Despite these challenges, advancements in
technology have provided effective solutions. Sophisticated plagiarism
detection software and restrictive digital rights management tools have been
developed to address these issues. In addition to these programs, increased
awareness and educational campaigns have contributed to better protection of
intellectual property.

From my perspective, the benefits of storing knowledge online are more

substantial and far-reaching compared to the aforementioned downsides. One of
the most significant advantages is accessibility. The Internet indeed transcends
geographical barriers, allowing individuals from any location to access a
reservoir of resources and research worldwide. For example, a student in
Vietnam can now access scholarly articles from leading Western universities
with ease, which was virtually impossible in the past due to physical distance
and limited availability of resources. Furthermore, online materials are
generally more affordable than printed books. E-books and digital articles often
cost significantly less, making them accessible to a broader audience. This
increased accessibility and affordability empower learners to acquire knowledge
more readily and at a lower cost.

In conclusion, while there are notable concerns regarding plagiarism and

unauthorized distribution of information online, these issues are being
effectively addressed through technology and awareness. The considerable
benefits of online knowledge storage, including enhanced accessibility and
affordability, make it a superior alternative to traditional book-based storage.
Therefore, the advantages of this development clearly outweigh its
disadvantages.

Some people think that parents should teach their children how to be good
members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the best place to
learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that children should be taught by their parents about how
to function as useful members of society, while others believe that sending
children to educational institutions is the best way for them to study this.
Although the latter opinion can be beneficial in some cases, I believe that family
upbringing plays a more important role in educating children to be good parts of
the community.

Schools can be considered suitable places for children to learn to be good

citizens. With standardized educational methods, schools can foster children’s
cognitive development so that they are able to contribute to society in the future.
For example, Trung Vuong school and Vinschool are well known for having
nurtured successful alumni such as Professor Ngo Bao, Professor Nguyen Hung
who have devoted their talents to the development of the country. However,
these people only represent a small fraction of the total number of students
attending schools, and thus sending children to schools cannot be the best
method of educating them to be good members of society.

I believe that parents play a more important role in teaching them how to be
good citizens. In Vietnam, the average class size is 20 students, which makes it
difficult for educators to provide proper schooling for each student. One to one
lessons at home, on the other hand, allow children to progress faster.
Furthermore, parents form stronger bonds with their offspring and thus, it is
easier for them to shape children’s personalities at an early age. For example, by
telling stories such as Robin Hood, Cinderella before bedtime, parents can instil
a sense of compassion and integrity into them. These children are likely to
become good members of society when they grow up.

In conclusion, although sending children to schools can be seen as a way of

teaching them how to be good citizens, I believe that domestic upbringing has a
bigger impact on determining who they are in the future.

There is an increasing trend around the world of married couples deciding

not to have children. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for couples
who decide to do this.

An increasing number of married couples around the world choosing to remain

childless. The main benefits of not having a child for couples are that they can
focus on their careers and have more time for themselves. The main drawbacks
are that they could not fit into their peers’ group and have no one to look after
them when they get old.

One primary advantage of remaining childless for married couples is that they
can focus on their work. This is because they have less responsibility and
distractions in their lives compared to the couples that have a child. Another
advantage of this is that they have more spare time. Looking after a child is a
full-time job for parents and taking most of their time, while child-free couples
have lots of free time after work. For example, many couples stop going out late
with their friends after having a child as they have to stay at home for looking
after their children.
One disadvantage of couples deciding not to have children is that they can
struggle to hang with their peers after most of them have children. Most parents
prefer to spend more time with other couples that have children as well.
Moreover, do not have anyone to look after them in their elderliness is another
disadvantage. Children are the ones who take care of their parents when they get
old because their parents did the same for them when they were young. For
instance, the vast majority of the people who live in care homes have no child.

In conclusion, the main benefits of staying child-free for couples are that they
can be more career-oriented and have more free time for themselves, and the
main drawbacks are that they could have problems about fitting into their
friends’ group and having no one to take care of them when they become older.

Some people say that television is useful for education, while others say it is
useful only for entertainment. Discuss both views and give your own
opinion.

Television is considered useful for education by some, while others claim that it
only serves entertainment purposes. While certain people believe television is
only for entertainment as it steals time, this essay claims that it is valuable as
educational programs on television can help a child’s intellect.

Some believe television is only useful for entertainment since it takes away
time. This is because they feel that children who spend too much time in front
of the television may miss out on life’s opportunities and that it is much more
productive to spend time with friends, to work on homework, to go outside, or
to relax instead of watching television. For example, kids who watch too much
television tend to work less on their homework, which results in poor
performance in school. However, I would argue that television is important as
education programs can aid in boosting children’s intellect.

Educational programs on television can help children become more intelligent.

Kids who watch informative and educational shows learn to solve problems and
develop strong mental maths skills. For instance, several studies have shown
that kids are more likely to outperform their peers on tests when they watch
educational shows. Additionally, studies have shown that children who watch
cartoons most of the time score less than those who watch educational shows.
Therefore, I strongly believe educational shows on television encourage
intellectual development in children.
In conclusion, while television is seen as only useful for entertainment because
it eats up time, watching informative educational shows on television can
develop a child’s intellectual skills.