2015

Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP)

Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation (AMRUT)

BARIPADA
 Baripada
As per the 2011 census, the population of
Baripada Municipal Corporation is 1.09 Lakh.
The decadal growth rate of the city is 22.99%.
The average floating population is about
10,000. Both horizontal and vertical growth of
the city is observed during the recent years.
Satellite towns are developing in the outskirts
of the city. Recently merged towns Indu Pahi,
Subarnarekha Irrigation Project area and
Poda Asthia are likely to develop in the future
to constitute a regional hub.
Besides Iron ore, the district has about 8
working china clay mines. Washed china clay
being an input in Textile, paper and rubber
industries of the country. Inspite of Baripada’s
location in the district, rich with Iron Ore,
China clay, Soft stone, Quartzite, Andalusite,
Vanadiferous, Magnetite, Copper and good
quality lime stone and pottery clay, the
presence of a mineral based Industry is still
lacking.
Baripada is virtually at the confluence of the
above mineral resource region in the North
western part of the district and the coastal Agricultural belt of Balasore district. The Iron ore belt of Joda,
Nayagarh and Gandhamardan of Keonjhar district with other Manganese resources available at Barbil and
Badjamunda of adjoining Keonjhar is linked to Baripada via NH-6 and NH-18. The district has essentially
contributed for the development of steel plants in Jharkhand, Bihar and West Bengal
In the Service Level Improvement Plan (SLIP) for Baripada, sector-wise projects identified and the
estimated costs are: water supply-1 nos./Rs. 8.96 Cr.; sewerage/Septage- 5 nos./ Rs. 291.43 Cr.; storm
water drainage- 5 nos/ Rs. 218.58 Cr.; urban transport – 9 nos. / Rs. 59.00 Cr.; and parks – 7 nos./ Rs.
12.03 Cr. In total 27 nos of projects have been identified with a total estimated cost of Rs. 590.00 Crore.
Water Supply
 Mission Management Information System
1. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Water Supply
(AMRUT Guidelines; para 3&6).This will also include existing institutional frame work for the
sector. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The zone-wise data shall be used
in identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive at city level service gaps.
While assessing service level gap reply following questions not more than word indicated
against each question

Question: What kind of baseline information is available for water supply system of the city?
Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sector. Is zone wise information
available?(75words)
Ans. As per census 2011 the population of the town is 109743. There are 28 nos. of in the
wards ULB. All information related water supply are available ward wise. Consumer and asset
database is maintained which are updated annually. One project is ongoing under UIDSSMT
which covers all the wards of Baripada City.

Question: Have you collected census 2011 data? Are you aware of baseline survey data of
MoUD? Have you correlated data from these and other sources? (75words)

Ans. The data regarding census 2011 has been collected. We have correlated the data with
other sources before preparing the proposal

What are existing services levels for water supply in the city? What is the coverage of water
supply Connections? What is per capita supply of water? How much is the extent of metering?
How much is non-revenue water? Provide information in table.
Ans: The existing service levels for water supply to Baripada city are given below in the
prescribed table.
Table: Status of Water Supply service levels

TABLE 1.1 : Status of Water Supply Service

Sl. Present MOUD Reliability
Indicators
No. status Benchmark Level
1 Coverage of water supply connections 38% 100% B

2 Per capita supply of water 108.45 135 C

3 Extent of metering of water connections 0% 100% D

4 Extent of non-revenue water 31% 20% D

5 Quality of water supplied 100% 100% C

6 Cost recovery in water supply services 50% 100% B
Efficiency in collection of water supply
7 42% 90% B
related charges

Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed by
MoUD? (75 words)

Ans: The quality of water has low reliability through the benchmark is achieved. HH coverage is
deficit by 62.00 % as compared to the benchmark. Though LPCD has achieved 108.45 LPCD,
there is heavy draw down during summer and hence not sustainable in long run. In absence of
metering the NRW is 31%. The low cost recovery is due to low coverage.
Source of Water and Water Treatment System

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.

Question: What is the existing source of water? Is it surface water source or underground water
source? What is the capacity of these sources?

Ans. The existing source is a mix of surface and ground water and the total capacity of both the
source is 14.87 MLD. From 50 production well (10.07 MLD) and surface source (4.80 MLD).

Question: Is there any treatment provided to water from these sources? How much water is
required to be treated daily ? What is the treatment capacity installed in the city?

Ans. Yes, 4.80 MLD of surface water is being treated daily. The capacity of the treatment plan
is 9.00 MLD. The ground water 10.07 MLD is also being disinfected using beaching powder.

Question: What per capita water supply in LPCD (liter per capita per day) comes out,
if you divide total water supply by the total population?

Ans.: The per capita water supply is 108.45 LPCD after deduction of 15% losses from the total
production.

DISTRIBUTION ZONES

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (how ever not limited to)
following questions.

Question: City is divided in how many zones for water supply?

Ans. The entire water supply system of the city is divided in 6 zones.

Question: Provide details of total no of Households (HH) in each zone, no of HH with and
without water tap connections in the Table
Ans: Detailed information given below.

Table: Zone Wise Coverage of Households

TABLE 1.2: Zone wise coverage of household

Households with direct water Households without direct water

Zone No Total No of Households
supply Connection supply connections

1 2338 811 1527

2 7222 1940 5282

3 3958 1557 2401

4 1211 224 987

5 3617 504 3113

6 6372 1947 4425

Total 24718 6983 17735

STORAGE OF WATER

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.

Question: What is the total water storage capacity in the city? What is capacity of elevated and
ground water reservoirs?

Ans. The total water storage capacity in the city 3.57 ML. The capacity of ESR is 0.91 ML and
Ground water reservoirs is 2.66 ML.

Question: In case of surface water, does city need to have ground level reservoirs to store raw
treated water?

Ans. There is no requirement to store Raw Water. However storage for treated water is
required.

Question: Is water being supplied to consumers through direct pumping or through elevated
reservoirs?

Ans. Both practices are being adopted now.

Question: Is storage capacity sufficient to meet the cities demand ?

Ans.No.

DISTRIBUTIONNETWORK

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.

Question: What is the total length of water supply distribution pipe line laid in the city?
Ans. Total distribution length is 135.6 Km

Question: What is the total road length in the city? Is the pipe lines are laid in all streets? Is the
objective of universal coverage of water supply pipe line is achieved?
Ans. The total road length in the city is 258.2 K.Ms. With completion of the ongoing UIDSSMT
project all the street will be covered with piped network.

Question :What are the kind of pipe materials used in distribution lines?
Ans. The pipe materials used in distribution lines are generally C.I., M.S. and PVC.

Question: Provide zone wise details of street length with and without water distribution lines in
the Table?

Table: Zone Wise length of distribution network

TABLE 1.3: Zone wise length of distribution network

Total Street Length Street length with water Street length without water
Zone No Remark
(Km) distribution pipe line (Km) distribution pipe line (Km)

1 25.2 13.2 12
2 76.5 38.6 38
3 42.0 23.6 18 Work is in progress
under UIDSSMT
4 12.0 6.3 6 scheme
5 36.4 19.1 17
6 66.1 34.7 31
Total 258.2 135.6 122.6

INSTITUTIONALFRAMEWORK

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.

Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding, service
provision in table

Table: Functions, roles, and responsibilities Planning and Design

TABLE 1.4a: Functions, roles, and responsibilities Planning and Design

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M

Project team headed by divisional EE of O & M team headed by EE of PHEO and

Planning and design Cell in EIC PHEO along with supervision field supported by operations engineers and
(PH) office headed by SE(P&D) and engineers (AEE/AE/JE) and supported by operators. MoU will be signed between
supported by technical cell and PMMU and PDMC. MoU will be signed PHEO and ULB for O & M of the
PDMC between PHEO and ULB for execution of infrastructure. Outsourced PPP model will
the project also be explored.

Question: How city is planning to execute projects?

Ans.The city is planning to execute the ongoing project through a dedicated filed supervision
team with hierarchical monitoring by PHEO.

Question: Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or any

parastatal body? Please refer para 8.1 of AMRUT guidelines.

Ans. It will be executed by a Public Health Engineering Organization, which a wing of Housing
& Urban Development Department

2. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives undertaken
in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to
achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each
of the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment and meeting the
opportunity to bridge the gap.
Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to address
these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for sector under
different schemes with status and when the existing projects are scheduled to be completed?
Provide information in Table

Table: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

TABLE 1.4b: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned projects

Cost Month of
Sl. No. Name of Project Scheme Name Status
(Cr. Rs.) Completion

Augmentation of water supply to Procurement process

1 UIDSSMT 53.79 June 2018
Baripada Town. in progress

Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in water supply
system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of network and collection
efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)

Ans. After completion of the above ongoing water supply project, the physical coverage of the
city will be 100%. However some house service connections will need to be filled in from
AMRUT scheme.

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What kind of
services will be required to fulfill the gap?

Ans. Only house service connections are required.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects by
changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to focusing on
optimum use of existing assets?

Ans. This exercise has already been done earlier to finalise the ongoing project.

Question: Has city conducted assessment of Non Revenue Water? If yes, what is the NRW
level? Is city planning to reduce NRW?

Ans. City has conducted assessment of Non-Revenue Water through indirect methods which is
approximately 31.00%. Yes the city has plans to reduce NRW by way of introduction of HH
level metering, reducing illegal connections and reducing technical losses.

Question: Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,

calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for water supply pipe network, number
of household to be provided with tap connections, and required enhancement in capacity of
water source/ treatment plant (MLD). Gaps in water supply service levels be provided as per
Table
TABLE 1.5: Gaps in water supply service levels
2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Present Total Demand Gap
projects

Source (MLD) -Surface Source 32 32 32 0

Treatment capacity (MLD) 9 16 25 25 0

Elevated Storage capacity (ML) 0.9 4.7 5.6 5.6 0

Distribution network coverage (m) 135600 122610 258210 258210 0

OBJECTIVES
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage.
While developing objectives following question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate
objective.
Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.

Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment?
Ans: The identified objective is universal coverage and achieving benchmark level of all
indicators as per SLB framework, which has been evolved from the outcome assessment.

Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Ans. Yes, the objective will be achieved by bridging the gap through 100% house service
connection

3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address
these gaps.. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.4 & 6.8 &
6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimate with broad source of
funding will be explored for each. While identifying the possible activities, also examine the
ongoing scheme and its solutions including status of completion, coverage and improvement in
O&M. Please provide information on the above responding to (however not limited to) following
questions.

Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the objectives?
(75 words)
Ans. The activities other than the ongoing project would involve provision of house service
connections which will be met from AMRUT scheme.

Question: How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ ADB funded
projects in the city etc? (100words)
Ans. UIDSSMT for Holistic approach in 6 zones.

Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities?(75words)

Ans: .State budgetary support

Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learnt during
implementation of these projects? (75 words)
Ans. Realistic estimate and availability of the land are the two major lessons learnt.

Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs?(100words)

Ans. Increase coverage, introduces metering, reduce unauthorized connection, introduce
automation and the like
Question: Will metering system for billing introduced?
Ans. Yes

Question: Whether reduction in O&M cost by addressing NRW levels be applied? (75 words)

Ans. Yes, with reduction on NRW the production will be controlled which will lead to reduction in
O&M cost.

Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?

Ans. Yes.

The alternative activities to meet these activities be defined as per table

Table: Alternative Activities To Meet Objectives

TABLE 1.6: Alternative Activities to Meet Objectives

Sr.
Objective Activities Financing Source
No.
1 Quality water supply Rehabilitation of venerable stretches UIDSSMT
2 Adequacy of water Treatment facility UIDSSMT
3 Universal coverage Network expansion and house connection UIDSSMT

4 NRW reduction Consumer metering & leak reduction UIDSSMT

5 Cost recovery Coverage & NRW reduction

4.Citizen Engagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback
on the suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed
with citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level
gaps. ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on the available
resources. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please explain following
questions in not more than 200 words detailing out the needs, aspirations and wishes
of the local people.

Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?

Ans. Yes

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?

Ans.Yes. Ward level consultation

Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?

Ans. Yes

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Ans.

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
Ans. Yes

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Ans. Since there is only one activity under the scheme, the same is prioritised
5. Prioritize Projects

Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based
on the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please
reply following questions in not more than 200 words.

Question: What are sources of funds?

Ans. UIDSSMT, AMRUT & State budget.

Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Ans. Yes

Question: Has projects been prioritized based on“ more with less”approach?

Ans. Yes

Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?

Ans. Yes

6.Conditionalities

Describe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability
of land, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment,
approval and permission needed to implement the project.

Ans. Land is available for the proposed infrastructure and environmental clearance are not
required for the project.

7.Resilience

Required approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience
factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable water supply scheme.
Describe in not more than 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals.

Ans. The project under implementation as well as proposed now are environmentally
sustainable and also disaster resilience.

8.FinancialPlan
The State has identified 1 Water Supply projects with an estimated cost of Rs. 8.96 Cr. to
achieve universal coverage as envisaged under AMRUT. The completion period of these
projects is by the year 2019-20. The water supply projects shall be implemented by a parastatal
agency, i.e. Public Health Engineering Organization (Urban). As the own revenue of ULBs is
insufficient, the State has taken a decision to meet ULB share from within state resources and
funds. Therefore, all infrastructure development projects under AMRUT will be funded by
Centre/State grants or loan funds by state agencies. Accordingly, the present investment on
AMRUT projects is on the basis of 50 percent fund as grant from Centre and 50 percent fund
that will be met by State Government grant. The state share will be met from funds budgeted
for the Housing and Urban Development Department. In the case of Bhubaneswar however,
the water supply project is proposed for implementation through PPP and State Government
share by way of VGF (Viability Gap Funding) will predicate on the response to the PPP offering.
Based on the above financial plan the specific responses to the questionnaires given in the
template are as under:
 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating infrastructure
projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB
do not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs. Nevertheless,
the state government has taken proactive steps to amend Municipal Corporation and Odisha
Municipalities Act to amend property tax to improve the revenue stream of the ULBs. This will
help the service provider manage the O & M expenses (OPEX) and move towards financial
sustainability. The state shall provide budgetary support fill up the financial gaps if any.
 List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50%
state grant. Soft loan from funding agencies will be explored which will form part of ULB
contribution. However, the state share will not be less than 20%.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence and
consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects covered under other
schemes. As all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on 50: 50 basis, consultation
with external funding partners is not required. However, consultation for involving other funding
partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.
 Is the proposed financial structure sustainable? If so then whether project has been
categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for all AMRUT projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be met
from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been
categorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT
scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption of 50% grant by the State Government is committed and listed.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, projects proposed include O&M for 5 years, which shall form an integral part of the
execution contract so that the agency/contractor who develops the assets shall be responsible
for post asset creation O&M for 5 years. The O&M cost for Water Supply shall be borne by the
PHEO, which is provided with budgetary support for both CAPEX and OPEX by the State
Government.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
ULBs and)
Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes convergence with various ongoing projects under different schemes supported
by both Central & State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, the detailed milestones and outcomes are furnished at table 2.1.

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5.
These tables are based on Amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.
TABLE 2.1: Master Plan of Water Supply Projects for Mission period
Year in which
Sr. Priority Year in which to Estimated Cost
Project Name & code proposed to be
No. number be implemented (Cr. Rs.)
completed
1 Improvement of WS to Baripada - P1 (metering) 1 16-17 17-18 8.96
TOTAL 8.96

TABLE 2.2: Master Service Level Improvement during Mission period

Change in Service Levels
Sr. Physical Estimated Cost
Project Name & code Existing After
No. Component Indicator (Cr. Rs.)
(As-Is) (To-be)
Improvement of WS to Baripada - P1 (metering) Metring Metering 0% 100% 8.96

TABLE 2.3.1a:Total Fund Sharing Pattern for water supply projects during mission
period

Sr. Total Project Share (Amount in Cr. Rs.)

Name of Project & code
No. Cost (Cr. Rs.)
GOI State ULB Others Total
1 Improvement of WS to Baripada - P1 (metering) 8.96 4.48 4.48 8.96
Total 8.96 4.48 4.48 - - 8.96

TABLE 2.3.2: Annual Fund Sharing break up for water supply project (Amount in Cr of Rs.)
State ULB
Sr.
Project Name & code GoI 14th 14th Convergence Total
No. Others Total Others Total Others
FC FC
Improvement of WS to
1 4.48 4.48 4.48 8.96
Baripada - P1 (metering)
Total 4.48 - 4.48 4.48 - - - - - 8.96

TABLE 2.5: Year wise Plan for Service Level Improvement

Annual Targets
Project (Increment from the Baseline Value)
Proposed Project Cost in Cr. Indicator Baseline
Rs. FY 2016 FY FY FY FY
H1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020
Ongoing under
53.79
UIDSSMT
Proposed under
8.96
AMRUT
Coverage of water supply
28% 30 35 40 70 100 100
connections
Per capita supply of water 108.5 108.5 108.5 108.5 135 135 135
Extent of metering of water
0% 0 5 40 80 100 100
connections
Extent of non-revenue water 31% 31 31 28 20 20 20
Quality of water supplied 100% 100 100 100 100 100 100
Cost recovery in water supply
50% 52 55 60 80 100 100
services
Efficiency in collection of
42% 45 60 80 100 100 100
water supply related charges
Storm Water Drainage
 Mission Management Information System
I. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Storm Water Drainage
(AMRUT Guidelines; Para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutional framework for the
sector. AMRUT is focused on improvement in service levels. The zone wise data shall be used in
identifying the gaps. These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive at city level service gaps. While
assessing service level gap reply following questions not more than word indicated against each
question.

1.1. What kind of baseline information is available for storm water drainage system of the
city? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sector. Is zone wise
information available? (75 words)
The base line information of urban population(ward wise) is available in Census-2011,
rainfall data with significance of catchment area is received from metrological department,
information about length of roads& drains (ward wise), maps are available in draft CDP for
Baripada City-2046 prepared by Srei Consultants India Pvt. Ltd..
Yes, zone wise information for Storm Water Drainage (SWD)is available.

1.2. Have you collected data from census other sources? Are you aware of baseline survey
data of MoUD? Have you correlated data from these and other sources?(75 words)

Yes, the data are collected from population Census 2011, District Statistics Office, slum
population from Urban Poverty Alleviation programs like Urban Statistics for HR and Assessments,
RAY etc.
Yes, the above information relating to baseline survey data of MoUD are ascertained from
CDP for Baripada City-2046.
Yes, all the data so manifested above are correlated as per availability of different sources.

1.3 What is existing service levels for storm water drainage in the city? What is the
coverage of drains? What are the no of incidence of sewerage mixing in the drains? How
many times water logging incidence happens in the city? Provide comparative information
of service levels (in tabulated form) with respect to the service level bench marks
prescribed by MoUD and sustainable standards for service levels under the National
Mission on Sustainable Habitat (NMSH) in table 1.1

Red
Sustainable Black (Caution for Present
Sr. No. Indicators (Immediate action
standards improvement) Status
for improvement)
Coverage of Storm water
1 100% <75% <50% 23.5%
drainage network
Incidence of sewerage
2 0% <25% <50% 5%
mixing in the drains1
Incidence of water logging2
3 0 <25 <50 16
(in nos. per year)

Table 1.1 :Status of Storm Water Level service levels

1.4: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks prescribed by MoUD
and sustainable standards for service levels under the National Mission on Sustainable
Habitat (NMSH)?(75 words)

1
Incidence of sewerage mixing in the drains are ratio of no of households discharging wastewater directly into the drains to the total no
of households.
2
No of times water logging is reported in a year, at flood prone points in the city
The Service Level Benchmarks as prescribed by the MoUD are being maintained w.r.t. promotion
of facilities to the urban citizens within the limited resources as per guidelines under National
Mission on Sustainable Habitat (NMSH). The coverage area of drain is achieved only 29% w.r.t.
road length. There are 16 nos. of water logging spots are identified within the city.

1.5 What are major challenge facing the city in regard to achieving these service level
benchmarks?
The challenges faced by the city to achieve SLB are as follows
1. Lack of proper drainage network
2. Encroachment & obstacles
3. Tidal river/ high tide/ flooding of river/ natural calamities
4. Choking of drains by solid waste
5. Silting of drains
6. Uncovered Drainages
1.6: Identify gaps in capacity in managing the services efficiently and also provide an
innovative solution for efficiently managing these services.
The challenges faced by the city to achieve SLB are as follows
1. Existing drain should be covered
2. Kutcha drains need to be converted to RCC.
3. Raising & widening of existing culverts at 7 points
1.7: Brief the ongoing drainage projects in the city. The components included in these
projects, how and up to what extent it will support to the drainage system of the city.
Weather it address all the issues related to drainage?
NO, there are no ongoing project present.
2.0 Coverage of drains **
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.

2.1:Describe how at present, the storm water of City is drained off? How many natural and
manmade drains are exists and their coverage with respect to road network?
There exist a network of kutch of total length 201.06 km and pucca 76.10 km drains finally leading
to 4 natural drain and small river which finally leads to Budhabalanga River.
There are four major natural drains an approximately and a small river. which sums up to be a total
of 313.16kms of drain. This compared to 258.6 kms of road network provides an coverage 29.4%
on storm water drainage sector with consideration of only manmade drains.
2.2 What is the capacity and condition of these drains? Is sufficient to carry the peak flow
of the catchment/water shed?
Presently the existing Pucca drains are in captive condition. These SWD are repaired and
maintained on regular basis. Some of them are 3 years old and some are 10 years old. However
none of them have a cover clab which is very much required.
No, the existing SWD network is not sufficient to carry the peak flow of the catchment/water shed.
2.3 Does city have separate storm water drainage network? If no, provide the information
regarding locations of gray water mixes with the existing drains in table 1.2. In case of
mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?
There is no separate SWD network prevailing in the city. The households outlet their gray water to
thesoakpit. Only 5% of house hold located in the slum area drains dispatch their grey water in the
SWD.
S. No. Sewer Zone/ Ward No Location Merging with which sewer
1 5 Vegetable market
2. 15 Dumosai tank
3. 14,20 Near TB hospital

Table 1.2: Detail of Locations where storm water get mixed with sewer
 2.4 In case of mixed drainage how it works in peak rainy days?
During the peak rainy days there is no much problem, water passes through the SWD.

3.0 Water Logging

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.
3.1 Presently how the problem of water logging is handled? Is it provides the satisfactory
outcome?
At, the present scenario at the water logging area pumps area used.
Somehow it solves the present problems during peak rainy season approx.. 105 hours per year.

3.2 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on
Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or
more) in the Table 1.2.
The reason for water logging and flooding are generally observed during peak rainy season
in low laying areas of the town with adjacent to the locality of the river bed side. Especially
during flood situations. As a result of which a very few households on the slum pockets are
being affected.
No of times water logging reported in a year (
S.No. Area No of points stagnant water for more than four hours of a
depth more than 6” )
Balgadi sahi, waligunj UP school, K.C. Circle
Key road (Udala road), Jagganath temple south gate,
1 intersection sarathi clinic (back side), tini kunia bandho
(back), Jotish advocate house (back), mama
ice cream factory,
Bhudi Khamari (West Side), Purana Patra
House To NH-5, Puranashwara Mandit
Along roads ( 50 mt Towards East, Back Side Of Rakhal Gop-UP
2 2
length or more) School. Back of Jail khana tank. Jamana
deipur. Nilaratna Dash house, Back of
Bhanjpur railway stn
Locality (affecting
3 cinema hall chowk, gudi pada, 1/2
50 HH or more)
Table 1.2: Flood prone points in the city

4.0 Chocking of drains

Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.
4.1 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on
Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or
more) in the Table 1.2.

Sewer
S. No. Location Stretch Length Affected (mm)
Zone/Ward No

1 1 Rajib Colony 53
2 1 Balogadia Drain 52
3 1 Near Panchanan Mandir 53
4 3 Satysahi School to River 56
5 4 Sai Nurshing home back side 53
6 5 Duli Padia 55
7 5 MPC College front Drain,Near Gujuri Market 53
8 5 Gujuri Market, Main Drain 56
9 5 College Front,Max Mart towards traffic 50
10 6 Ram & Shyam Drain 50
 11 6 Sidhath Hotel 53
12 7 Bapa Puo Tiffin Shop, Hospital Chaka 50
13 7 Huduka Colony drain 52.36
14 8 BJP office front Drain 52
15 8 Durga Hotel Drain 52
16 9 Baruni Drain, Sai Binayak 53
17 9 K.C Circle Dharama Shala to River 61
18 10 Dinakrushna Babu House Back Side 56
19 10 Surya Nibas to River 52
20 11 Dr. Sukumar Das , Chaka to Mauna Hotel Backside 56
21 12 Convert Chhaka to Pratappur Road Booth Side 53
22 13 Hatababu Drain (Sharma House to River) 52
23 14 Sunagadia Main Drain , Front of Sunagadia U.P. School 53
24 14 Infront of Pradep Mishra 53
25 15 Tiranga Club Front Side 61
26 16 Mangala Mandir 52
27 17 Thakurani Thana Drain 53
28 18 Bala Sharma Chhaka 56
29 18 Jamuna Dei School Front side 52
30 18 Jamuna Dei Baripada dCollege back side 61
31 19 Tower Goli 53
32 20 Nurul House 52
33 21 Grand Goli 56
34 21 NH side Drain 58
35 21 Naba Diganta Residential School 53
36 22 mangala Bag Drain 56
37 23 Takatpur Chaka 53
38 24 Prakash Mishra House 59
39 25 NH Drain, Near Nico 53
40 26 B.D.O Chaka to towards West 56
41 26 Bata Basa House towards Prabhakar House 59
42 27 Kali Mandir Back side 53
43 27 Nirmala House to Rama House 52
44 27 Jiten Shop Back Side 61
45 27 In Front of Bhubaneswari Temple 56
46 27 Puhan Babu House to Meher House 53
47 28 Bagh Diha College 52
Table 1.2: Detail of Locations prone to chocking of drains due to solid waste

4.2 How presently the problem is addressed?

This ULB is taking all appropriate measures for Desilting of drains by municipality sweepers.
5.0 Institutional Framework
Please provide information in 150 words on the above responding to (however not limited to)
following questions.
5.1 Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding, service
provision in table 1.3. Is it in accordance with the AMRUT guidelines (Clause 8.1)?
 This ULB is confined with promoting basic amenities to its town’s people in terms of O&M creating
awareness amongst the people and their role of social responsibility through the community
participation. The Planning & Policies are being prepared and monitored by technical experts and
stakeholders. The implementation of the policy with reference to appropriation of funds is being
monitored by GA with a view of maximum utilities with limited resources.

Planning and Design Construction/ Implementation O&M

ULB, ULB ULB
Table 1.3: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

5.2 How city is planning to execute projects?

The council of the ULBs at the beginning of the FY prepares the projects to be undertaken under
this head with availability of funds and execution of projects in time bound manner. It should be
tender based and in a contractual basis.

5.3 Shall the implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation? If no, weather
resolution has been passed by the Municipal Corporation and accordingly, a tripartite
Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between State Government, Municipal Corporation
and Parastatal has been signed? Please refer Para 8.1 of AMRUT guidelines.
YES. The projects shall be implemented by the ULB concerned with due weightage to MoU and
AMRUT guidelines withthe help of technical experts, designers and stakeholders.

II. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives undertaken in
different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to
achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.2 & 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of
the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment and meeting the
opportunity to bridge the gap.

1.1 List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to address these
gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for sector under
different schemes with status and when the existing projects are scheduled to be
completed? Provide information in Table

Status
S. Month of
Name of Project Scheme Name Cost (as on ddmm
No. Completion
2015)
1. NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL

Table 1.4: Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

1.2 How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in storm water drainage
system? Will completion of above improve the coverage of network; eliminate the chocking
of drains and water stagnation problem? If yes, how much. (100 words)
The existing system is able to cover only 29% of the road length and have 7 major flooding points.
As there is no ongoing project so there would not be any change in improvement of the service
level and the above said gaps remains that is 71% coverage and no flooding points.

1.3 Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What kind of
services will be required to fulfill the gap?
Yes, the city would require additional asset creation and renovation of the existing one to achieve
the 100 % universal coverage necessary to improve the SWD system.
The city needs 100% SWD coverage with covered drains and which would need proper
maintenance of the existing infrastructure and new system.
 1.4 How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects by changing
their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to focusing on
optimum use of existing assets?
There is a good network of Kutcha and pucca drains which could be retrofitted and rejuvenated to
bring down the cost of the total new asset creation.
Further As the terrain is align towards Budhabalanga River, hence there should be a proper
network of primary, secondary drains & tertiary drains which would lead lead SWD to the existing
natural drain.

1.5 Has city conducted assessment of O&M cost of drains and potable pumps? if yes, what is
it? Is city planning to reduce it?
There is no assessment done in maintenance of the drains and the pumps. However there are
maintenance as in when required.

1.6 Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects,

calculate existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for Rejuvenation of existing drains,
construction of new primary and secondary drains, construction of pump house with
pumping machinery, covering of drains. Gaps in Storm water drainage service levels are
provided as per Table 1.5.

1.7 Provide details of flood points/areas prone to frequent water logging with special focus on
Key road intersections, along roads (50 mt length or more) and Locality (affecting 50 HH or
more) in the Table 1.5.
2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Present Total Demand Gap
projects
Major Drains (new construction) NIL nil Nil 12.75 12.75
Network requirement to provide proper drainage to all
identified water stagnant point/ flooding points up to the 76.10 nil 76.10 258.26 182.16
end discharge point (in Km)
Network length where households discharging
3.80 nil 3.80
wastewater directly into the drains
Rejuvenation of existing primary drains and primary
0 nil 0 42.85 42.85
drains including covering and installation of filter

1.8 Whether these gaps presented in measurable/ executionable ways considering all the
ongoing projects? (75 words)
As there are no existing projects available.
2.0 Objectives
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps to achieve universal coverage.
While developing objectives following question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate
objective.

2.1 Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment?
Yes, the objective has been evolved from the SLB assessment which tries to fill the gap in order to
achieve the 100% universal coverage.

2.2 Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap?
Yes, all the objectives has been derived keeping in mind the existing opportunities which would
probably try to bridge the existing gap in order to achieve the 100% universal coverage.

2.3 Does objectives clearly address all these gaps /solution to all the problems related to storm
water drainage of the city?
Yes, each of the objectives has been formulated in order to bridge the existing gap and find
solution to all the problems related to storm water drainage of the city.

Please provide List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 150 words.
 III. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost
The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address
these gaps.These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.4 & 6.8 &
6.9).This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estimate with broad source of
funding will be explored for each. While identifying thepossible activities, also examine the ongoing
scheme and its solutions including status of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M.
Please provide information on the above responding to (however not limited to) following
questions.
1.1 Does all these gaps clearly identified and addressed? (75 words)
Yes, The detail estimate with source of funding have been identified in respect of Baripada City
with respect to SWD which can some extent improvise the present scenario with an expectation of
greater utility.

1.2 What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the objectives? (75
words)
The construction kuccha drains, retrofitting, renovation of the necessary pucca drains and lining of
the left out natural drains could be constructed under the state and ULB funding. (Annual cleaning
of Drainage is also from state / ULB fund)
The possible activities are as follows:
1) Construction of RCC kuccha drains with cover slabs
2) Covering of existing puccaa drains
3) Desilting / retrofitting, renovation of exsting puccaa drains
4) Lining of the left out natural drains
5) Frequent Cleaning of SWD channel.
The major funding of the above sector has been three folded that is central, state and ULB.

1.3 How can the activities be converged with other programme like JICA/ ADB
funded/SBM/Smart city mission projects in the city etc.? (i.e. convergence with other
schemes)(100 words)
The convergence of the activity can’t be done for the city as the city is not covered in any of the
major mission like SBM. However, the SBM is taken up by the municipality. So we could propose
the action necessary to avoid choking of the drainage through the SBM, which indirectly helps in
improving the SWD of the city.

1.4 What are the options (financial alternatives) of completing the ongoing activities specially
ongoing JnNURM projects? (75 words)
As Baripada city is not covered under the JNNURM/UDISSMT etc. So there are no other mission
which would cater as a financial alternative. Further there is no major ongoing activity on the
sector for the city.

1.5 What are the lessons learnt during implementation of similar projects? (100 words)
There has been an issue related to execution of the similar project. There exists local and site
specific issues. Further there are also encroachment & eviction of the property adjacent to the
SWD.
Also there are various service lines like cable line/ service lines/ phone line laid with the SWD
which creates an unnecessary delay in O&M and also renovation of the SWD. Also, there has
been shortage of staff, lack of skilled personnel, training. The ULB also need proper capacity
building for the staffs and the service providers who can improvise the day to day activities.

1.6 Have you analyzed best practices and innovative solutions in sector? Is any of the practice
be replicated in the city?(75 words)
Certain of cities of Kerala is seen to be the best practice and many of the issues related to the
flooding and storm water network could be resolved by looking at those city.
However there are no similarity in geographical features of the Cuttack and Baripada.
 1.7 What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs?(100 words)
Presently there is only holding tax being imposed in the town so by imposing property tax the
sector could achieve the required financial help at least for the maintenance. Then inclusion of
SWD into the Property tax.

1.8 Whether reduction in O&M cost by energy efficient pumps etc be applied?(75 words)
Yes, as the ULB uses pumps in the city to take off the flooding water so it is necessary to
considered energy efficient pumps.

1.9 Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT), Design Built
Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?(100 words)
There is no PPP mode used in any of the plan or project in Baripada city.
The alternative activities to meet these activities are defined as per Table 1.6

IV. Citizen Engagement

ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the
Sr.
Objective Activities Financing
No.
Source
1 To Have Complete network Coverage and Augmentation Of The SWD Network
covering of The Storm Water Network Creation of the new network
Covering of the SWD

To reduce the flooding points and its flooding Improving the SWM under Swatch Bharat
2
time. Abhiyan State / Central/ ULB
Creating the energy efficient pumping facility
Creating the energy efficient pumping
3 To reduce the backflow of the flooding water
facility
4 Creating the Swliss gate facility
suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and
activities to be taken up will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these
activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7
& 7.2). Please explain following questions in not more than 200 words detailing out the needs,
aspirations and wishes of the local people.
1.1 Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?
All the major stakeholder has been included in the consultancy workshop. This includes majorly
council members and media persons etc.
1.2 Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?
Yes, but not separately the ward council members have been called up in the consultations.
1.3 Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?
No the alternative hasn’t been proposed above the crowd source.
1.4 What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?
Yes, only the major and the relevant feedbacks and alternatives/innovations has been taken up.
1.5 Is any new potential alternative is received? If so, how it is addressed?
No there are no potential alternative is received.
1.6 Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of consultations?
As no alternatives has been received so it hasn’t been taken up for discussion.
1.7 What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?
Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic area
with less problematic area as the city is flood affected.
V. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on
the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please reply
following questions in not more than 200 words.
 1.1 What are sources of funds?
The major sources of State fund / ULB fund/ finance commission fund (central)
1.2 Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?
Yes. But partly and indirectly with the SWM, for choking of the drains
1.3Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?
Our approach has been taken up with the consideration of prioritizing the more problematic area
with less problematic area as the city is flood affected.
1.4 Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?
Yes, we have taken up approach to completely solve (Universal coverage that is 100% coverage)
the problem of SWD.
VI. Conditionalties
Describe in not more than 300 words the Conditionalties of each project in terms of
availability of land, environmental obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial
commitment, approval and permission needed to implement the project. ** (Plz : attach
pages)
As the project is for Storm Water Drainage so no major land is required. However, it is necessary
for the pump house. There is requirement of environmental clearance and the NOC for the outfall
points.
The financial commitment, approval and permission is needed to be implement for the project from
the necessary department.
VII. Resilience
Required approvals will be sought from ULBs and competent authority and resilience factor
would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable storm water drainage scheme.
Describe in not more than 300 words regarding resilience built in the proposals. ** (Plz :
attach pages)
The BOD and the COD of the storm should be lower down to the necessary level such that it
doesn’t affect the nearby environment.
Further the possibility of the necessary ground water recharge for the area should be considered.
VIII. Financial Plan
Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in
terms of capital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.5)
Based on the investment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified.
Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared.
(AMRUT Guidelines; Para 4, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include
percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State and City) including financial
convergence with various ongoing projects. While preparing finance plan please reply
following questions in not more than 250 words
 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating infrastructure
projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB do
not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.
 List of individual projects which are being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and 50% state
grant.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence and
consultation with funding partners?
Yes, as all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on 50: 50 basis, consultation with other
funding partners is not required. However, consultation for involving other funding partners will be
explored to achieve the objective of the mission.
 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has been
categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be met
from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been categorized
based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
 Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of apart from infrastructure cost, the O&M requirement of project
life cycle. It will be possible to be sustained throughout the life cycle.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State, and
ULBs)
Yes, the initial sharing of financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes various ongoing projects under different schemes supported by both Central &
State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided

Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 1.7,1.8,1.9,1.10 and 1.11. These
tables are based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2,2.3.1,2.3.2, and 2.5.
Year in which
Priority Year in which proposed Estimated
Sr. No Project Name to be
number to be completed Cost
implemented
Augmentation of SWD in Baripada
1 town in zone 4 1 2015-16 2016-17 70.80
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/04
Augmentation of SWD in Baripada
2 town in Zone-2
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/02
2 2016-17 2017-18 122.96
Augmentation of SWD in Baripada
3 town in Zone-5
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/05
Augmentation of SWD in Baripada
4 town in Zone-1 3 2017-18 2018-19 106.92
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/01
Augmentation of SWD in Baripada
5 town in Zone-3 4 2018-19 2018-19 45.50
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/03
Augmentation of SWD in Baripada
6 town in Zone-6 5 2019-20 2019-20 22.65
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/06
Grant Total 368.83

Table 1.7 Master Plan of Storm Water Drainage Projects for Mission period(As per Table 2.1of
AMRUT guidelines)

Change in Service Levels

S. Estimate
Project Name Physical Component After to
No Indicator Existing As-Is d Cost
Be
Coverage Drainage
1. Construction of covered storm water 39.25% 100%
Network
drainage network.
Augmentation of 2. Renovation of existing Drain with
SWD in Baripada covered slab
1 town in zone 3 3. Construction of wet well. 19.19
Incidence of Water
AMRUT/OD/BARI 4. Construction of Pumping Station and 5 0
Logging
PADA/SWD/03 erection of pumping arrangement.
5. Arrangement of Sluice gate
6. Lining of Natural Drain
 1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage
drainage network. 34.59% 100%
Network
Augmentation of 2. Renovation of existing Drain with
SWD inBaripada covered slab
2 town in zone-2 3. Construction of wet well. 22.49
AMRUT/OD/BARI 4. Construction of Pumping Station and Incidence of Water
3 0
PADA/SWD/02 erection of pumping arrangement. Logging
5. Arrangement of Sluice gate
6. Lining of Natural Drain
1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage
drainage network. 30.50% 100%
Network
Augmentation of 2. Renovation of existing Drain with
SWD In Baripada covered slab
3 town in zone-4 3. Construction of wet well. 45.48
AMRUT/OD/BARI 4. Construction of Pumping Station and Incidence of Water
2 0
PADA/SWD/04 erection of pumping arrangement. Logging
5. Arrangement of Sluice gate
6. Lining of Natural Drain
Augmentation of 1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage
24.26% 100%
SWD in Baripada drainage network. Network
4 town in Zone-1 2. Renovation of existing Drain with 108.88
Incidence of Water
AMRUT/OD/BARI covered slab. 0 0
Logging
PADA/SWD/01 3.Lining of Natural Drain
Augmentation of 1. Construction of covered storm water Coverage Drainage
20.22% 100%
SWD in Baripada drainage network. Network
5 town in Zone-5 2. Renovation of existing Drain with 22.56
Incidence of Water
AMRUT/OD/BARI covered slab. 0 0
Logging
PADA/SWD/05 3.Lining of Natural Drain

Table 1.8 Master Service Levels Improvements during Mission Period

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Table1.9 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Storm Water Projects

Total Share
Sr.No Name of Project Financial Year Project Total
Cost GoI State ULB Others
Augmentation of SWD in
1 Baripada town in zone 3 2015-16 19.19 9.59 9.59 19.19
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/03
Augmentation of SWD in
2 Baripada town in zone-2 2016-17 22.49
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/02
Augmentation of SWD In
3 Baripada town in zone-4 2017-18 45.48
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/04
Augmentation of SWD in
4 Baripada town in Zone-1 2018-19 108.88
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/01
Augmentation of SWD in
5 Baripada town in Zone-5 2019-20 22.56
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/05
Total 218.58 9.59 9.59 19.19
Table1.9 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Storm Water Projects
(As per Table 2.3.1of AMRUT guidelines)
State ULB Convergence Others Total
Sr.
Project GoI 14th 14th
No. Others Total Others Total 19.19
FC FC

Augmentation of SWD in
Baripada town in zone 3
1 9.59 9.59
AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/SWD/0
3

Total

Table 1.11Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements

(As per Table 2.5 of AMRUT guidelines)

Proposed FY2016
Sl. Base Present FY FY FY FY
Project Indicator Gap
No Line Status 2017 2018 2019 2020
Cost in Cr
H1 H2

Coverage of Storm Water 38.24 48.70 70.51 88.77 100.00

1 100% 29% 71%
Drainage Network % % % % %
218.58
2 Incidence of Water Logging 0 7 7 5 3 2 0 0
Sewerage
 Mission Management Information System

1. Assess the Service Level Gap

The first step is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for Sewerage
(AMRUT Guidelines; para 3 & 6). This will also include existing institutional framework for
the sector. For this City has to review all policy, plans, scheme documents etc. to identify
service level gaps and hold discussions with officials and citizens. AMRUT is focused on
improvement in service levels. The zone wise data shall be used in identifying the gaps.
These zone-wise gaps will be added to arrive at city level service gaps. While assessing
service level gap reply following questions not more than word indicated against each
question.

Question: What kind of baseline information is available for sewerage system of the
city? Detail out the data, information, plans, reports etc related to sewerage
available with city? Is zone wise information available? Have you correlated your
data with census 2011 data? (100 words)
Ans. Census 2011, Draft CDP, are available and have been correlated with census
2011 data.

Question: What are existing service levels for sewerage for coverage of sewerage
network services, efficiency of collection of sewerage and efficiency in treatment. Provide
information in table

Table 2.1 : Status of sewerage network and Service l evels

MOUD Benchmark

Sr. Existing
Indicators
No Service level

100%
coverage of latrines ( individual or
1 73%
community)

2 Coverage of sewerage network services 0% 100%

3 Efficiency of collection of sewerage 0% 100%

4 Efficiency in Treatment: Adequacy of sewerage 0% 100%

treatment capacity
Question: What is the gap in these service levels with regard to benchmarks
prescribed by MoUD? (75 words)

Ans: There is no sewerage network & hence no collection & no treatment. The septage disposal is
irregular and mostly to open drains. Hence the gap in these service level with regard to
benchmarks prescribed by MoUD is 100% .

Question: Does city has separate drainage system or sewer lines take care of storm
water? (50 words)
Ans: Yes, the city is having partly separate drainage system.

Coverage of latrines (individual or community), Please provide information in

Table 2.2 A

Total number of HH without Coverage of

Zone No individual or community latrines (%),(a-
toiletswithin walking distance b b)/a*100%
Total number of HH ( a)

1 4963 1340 73%

2 16335 4410 73%
3 septage 3420 923 73%

Total 24718 6673

SEWERAGE NETWORK AND COLLECTION OF SEWERAGE

Question: How much of the area of the city is covered by sewerage network?
What is the status of household connections in each zone? What are the areas
covered under septage? Provide information in Table
Table 2.2b : Sewerage network and collection of sewage
Coverage of
sewerage
network services

Households with
Zone No Total No. of Sewerage
(b/a)*100%
Households(HH) Network
a b
1 4963 0 0
2 16335 0 0
3 3420 0 0

Question: Are there any areas where sewer lines have been laid but still
households are not connected to sewer lines? Are there any areas where
toilets may be connected to sewer lines but kitchen or bathroom waste are not
connected to sewerage system? (75 words)

Ans: Such condition does not arise.

Question: Is there any systematic and organized method to collect and treat waste
from septic tanks? What is the duration of cleaning of septic tanks (monthly, quarterly,
semiannually or annually)? Indicate status of overflows of septic tanks, either in the
nearby drains /open fields/ sewerage lines etc? (75 words)

Ans: At present there is no systematic and organized method to collect and treat waste from
septic tanks. Only 1(one ) nos. of Cess Pool emptier are available which is not sufficient for systematic and
organized cleaning. As there is no organized method of collection in many of the cases,
the septic tanks overflow either into nearby drains /open fields etc.

Question: What is the situation of O&M of the existing sewerage system? Does the city
has routine maintenance system or breakdown maintenance system? What is the
duration of cleaning of sewer lines (monthly, quarterly, semiannually or annually)?
Indicate infrastructure available for O&M of the sewerage system i.e sewer jetting
machines etc? (100 words)

Ans: Does not arise, since there is no sewerage system .

SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM

Question: Does city has Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)? Which areas are covered under
each of the STPs? Provide details in Table 2.3
Table 2.3: Status of Existings STPs :

Capacity Inflow in the Efficiency in

Location zone (MLD) STP (MLD) %

Sr. No
1 NIL
2 NIL

3 NIL

Question: Does decentralized waste treatment system exists or planned in the city? If
yes, provide details (75 words)

Ans: There is no decentralized waste treatment system in the city

Question: How much of sewerage is generated in the city? How much of this sewerage
generated reaches the STPs? What is the Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) of incoming
and outgoing sewage of each STP? (100 words)

Ans: NIL. Since there is no sewer collection & treatment system, no sewage reaches the STP.

Question: Is treated sewage being reused or recycled? Is treated water being used for
irrigation or industrial purpose? Does the option of power generation being explored?
(75 words)

Ans: No.

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

Question: Define role and responsibilities in terms of O&M, policy planning, funding,
service provision in table

Table: 2.4: Functions, roles, and responsibilities

Planning and
Construction/Implementation O&M
Design

Project team headed by divisional PE

Planning and
OWSSB supported by PMMU and PDMC O & M team headed by
design Cell in
. There will be MOu between Municipality Municipal Engineer of
Ms of ,
and State Govt/ OWSSB for Baripada Municipality.
OWSSB
implementation.
Question: Please also detail that how city is planning to execute projects. Shall the
implementation of project be done by Municipal Corporation or any parastatal body?
(75 words)

Ans: Implementation of project will done by Orissa Water Supply & Sewerage Board

2. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, based on initiatives
undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects, objectives will be developed to bridge
the gaps to achieve universal coverage. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.2 & 6.3, Annexure-2; Table
2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of assessment and
meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.
Question: List out initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and projects to
address these gaps. For this provide details of ongoing projects being carried out for
sewerage system under different schemes with status and when the existing projects
are scheduled to be completed? Provide information in Table

Table: 2 . 5 Status of Ongoing/ Sanctioned

Month of Status (as on
completion ddmm 2015
Scheme Cost in
Name of Project
name Rs Cr
Sr. No
NIL 0

Total 0

Question: How much the existing system will able to address the existing gap in
sewerage system? Will completion of above will improve the coverage of network and
collection efficiency? If yes, how much. (100 words)

Ans: The existing system will be able to address the existing gap by 0%. Since no on going
scheme, ongoing/ sanctioned system will be able to improve 0% network and collection
efficiency.

Question: Does the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services? What
kind of services will be required to fulfill the gap?

Ans: Yes, the city require additional infrastructure to improve the services. It needs sewerage
system and treatment.

Question: How does the city visualize to take the challenge to rejuvenate the projects
by changing their orientation, away from expensive asset replacement programs, to
focusing on optimum use of existing assets?
Table 2.6: Demand Gap Assessment.
2015 2021
Component Ongoing
Existing Total Demand Gap
projects

Sewerage net work km 0 0 0 221.91 221.91

No of Households covered
under sewerage system 0 0 0 28277 28277
(2021 demand)
Sewerage treatment plant
0 0 0 15 15
MLD (2030 demand)

Note: The demand gap will be fulfilled as per requirement of CPHEEO Manual.

Based on assessment of existing infrastructure and ongoing / sanctioned projects, calculate

existing gaps and estimated demand by 2021 for sewerage network, number of household to
be provided with connections, and required enhancement in capacity of STP (MLD), area to be
covered under septage management. Based on the demand and gap assessment, evolve
objectives to achieve bridging this gap.

Question: Does each identified objectives will be evolved from the outcome of
assessment?
Ans: Yes

Question: Does each objective meet the opportunity to bridge the gap? Please provide
List out objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.

Ans: Yes, each objective meets the opportunity to bridge the gap.

3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost

The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to
address these gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines;
Para 6.4 & 6.8 & 6.9). This will also include review of smart solutions. The cost estim ate
with broad source of funding will be explored for each alternative. While identifying the
possible activities, also examine the ongoing scheme and its solutions including status
of completion, coverage and improvement in O&M. Please reply following questions in
not more than 200 words.

Question: What are the possible activities and source of funding for meeting out the
objectives?

Ans: The activities are sewer network, treatment and house connection to meet the objective for
universal coverage of sewerage system.
Question: How can the activities be converged with other programmes like JICA/ ADB
funded projects in the city etc?
Ans: Does not arise.
Question: What are the options of completing the ongoing activities?

Ans: here does not arise. But done Through State Govt and other funding.

Question: How to address the bottlenecks in the existing project and lessons learnt
during implementation of these projects?

Ans: The bottlenecks that is disposal arrangements, reuse of treated waste water etc learnt have been
addressed and shall be taken care during implementation of these projects under AMRUT.

Question: Has projects includes O&M of sewerage system?

Ans: Yes.
Question: What measures may be adopted to recover the O&M costs? Can the option
of sale of treated wastewater be applicable to recover the O&M cost.

Ans: Collection of of new connection fees and monthly sewerage fees.

Question: What are innovative alternative solutions explored in achieving objectives?

Ans: Options for STP methodology and innovation that is reuse of treated waste water explored in
achieving objectives.

Question: Are different options of PPP such as Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT),

Design Built Finance Operate and Transfer (DBFOT) are considered?

Ans: Yes, Design-build-Operate-Transfer (DBOT) will be considered.

Question: How the recycle and reuse of waste water will be done? How much quantity of
treated water may be reused?
Ans: Does not arise.

Question: Have you analysed best practices and innovative solutions in sewerage
sector? Is any of the practice be replicated in the city?
Ans: Yes.

Question: Have you identified the areas for decentralized waste treatment
system? Explore the approaches for septage management i.e People Public
Private Partnership (PPPP) model or replacing septic tanks by bio-digesters,
bioremediation etc.

Ans: Decentralized waste treatment system provided.

The alternative activities to meet these activities be defined as per Table 2.7
 Table2.7 Alternative Activities To Meet Objectives

Sl.
Objective Activities Financing Source
No

Universal coverage with Sewerage system and construction of

1 AMRUT
sewerage system STP, re use of treated waste water.

4. Citizen Engagement
Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up
will be prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these
activities and their scaling up based on the available resources. (AMRUT
Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please reply following questions in not more
than 200 words.
Question: Has all stakeholders involved in the consultation?
Ans: Yes

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city?

Ans: Yes

Question: Has alternative proposed above are crowd sourced?

Ans: Yes through website.

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Ans: Proposed proposal is well appreciated.

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
Ans: Yes.
Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Ans: Keeping in mind how the house holds can be well covered under sewerage facilities opted
for achieving early coverage of the gap assessed under AMRUT.

5. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up
based on the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing
projects, please reply following questions in not more than 200 words.

Question: What are sources of funds?

Ans: State Govt. fund/ Govt. of India fund

Question: Has projects been converged with other program and schemes?

Ans: Yes
Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?

Ans: Yes.

Question: Has the universal coverage approach indicated in AMRUT guidelines followed for
prioritization of activities?

Ans: Yes.

6. Conditionalities
Describe the Conditionalities of each project in terms of availability of land, environmental
obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment, approval and permission
needed to implement the project. Please reply following questions in not more than 100 words.
Ans: Govt land has been identified and available. Environmental clearance applied and other
clearances / NOC are under process.
7. Resilience
Required approvals will be sought from competent authority and organisations. The resilience
factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Please reply
following questions in not more than 100 words.

Ans: The proposed project under AMRUT and ongoing/ sanctioned would be builtin to ensure
environmentally sustainable sewerage scheme. Also Odisha State Pollution Board requirements shall
be adhered to.

8. Financial Plan
Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of
capital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.5) Based on the
investment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for
the complete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; para
4, 6.6, 6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different
stakeholders (Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoing
projects. While preparing finance plan please reply following questions in not more than 200
words

 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, projects proposed include O&M for 5 years. O&M shall be integral part of the execution
contract so that the agency/contractor who develops the assets shall be responsible for post
asset creation O&M for 5 years. The O&M cost for Water Supply shall be borne by the
OWSSB (Odisha Water Supply and Sewerage Board).
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
ULBs and)
Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes convergence with various ongoing projects under different schemes supported
by both Central & State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided as per detailed furnished at table 8.1
Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These tables
are based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

Table 8.1 Master Plan of Sewerage Projects for Mission period

Infrastructure Improvement

Project Name and Code6 (list all projects to Change in Service Levels Estimated Cost
Sr.
achieve universal coverage in the City
No.
separately for water supply and sewerage Year in which
Priority Year in which to be (Amount in Rs.
proposed to be
number implemented Cr.)
completed

Sewerage System for Baripada , Zone 1 –

1 Sewer network AMRUT/OD/Baripada 2 2016-17 2018-19 59.7
/SG/01
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 1 –
2 STP & Pumping Stations. 3 2016-17 2018-19 13.23
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/02
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 2 –
3 Sewer network AMRUT/OD/Baripada 4 2016-17 2018-19 186.15
/SG/03
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 2–
4 STP & Pumping Stations. 5 2016-17 2018-19 30.52
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/04
Septage Management works for Baripada
5 1 2015-16 2015-16 1.83
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/05
Grand Total Total AMRUT 291.43
on going 0

Table 8.2: Master Service Levels Improvements during Mission Period

(As per Table 2.2 of AMRUT guidelines)
Infrastructure Improvement
Estimated
Change in Service Levels
Sl. Cost
Project Name and code7
No. Physical components (Amount in Rs.
Existing After
Indicator Cr)
(As-is) (To-be)
Sewerage System for Baripada , a .Coverage
Sewer network &
1 Zone 1 – Sewer network b.Collection 0% 100% 59.7
house connection
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/01 efficiency
Sewerage System for Baripada,
STP, Pumping main Sewage treatment
2 Zone 1 – STP & Pumping Stations. 0% 100% 13.23
and Pumping Stations & disposal
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/02
Sewerage System for Baripada, a .Coverage
Sewer network &
3 Zone 2 – Sewer network b.Collection 0% 100% 186.15
house connection
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/03 efficiency
Sewerage System for Baripada,
STP, Pumping main Sewage treatment
4 Zone 2– STP & Pumping Stations. 0% 100% 30.52
and Pumping Stations & disposal
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/04
Septage Management & ID works for
Collection &
5 Baripada FSM & treatment 0% 100% 1.83
Treatment
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/05
Total 291.43
 Table 8.3 Annual Fund Sharing Pattern for Sewerage Projects
(Rs. in Cr.)

Share
Total
Sector Project Others Total in
cost GoI State ULB
(OUIDF) Cr

Sewerage and Septage management

Proposed Projects

Sewerage System for Baripada , Zone 1 – Sewer network

59.7 0 0 0
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/01
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 1 – STP & Pumping
13.23 0 0 0
Stations. AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/02
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 2 – Sewer network
186.15 0 0 0
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/03
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 2– STP & Pumping
30.52 0 0 0
Stations. AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/04
Septage Management & ID works for Baripada,
1.83 0.915 0.915 1.83
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/05
Total 1.83

Table 8.4: Annual Fund Sharing Break-up for Sewerage Projects

Sr. State ULB

Convergence

Others
Total in
Project GoI

14thFC

Others
14th Cr
No. Others Total Total
FC

Sewerage System for Baripada , Zone 1 –

1 Sewer network 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/01
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 1 –
2 STP & Pumping Stations. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/02
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 2 –
3 Sewer network AMRUT/OD/Baripada 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
/SG/03
Sewerage System for Baripada, Zone 2–
4 STP & Pumping Stations. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/04
Septage Management & ID works for
5 Baripada 0.915 0.915 0.915 1.830
AMRUT/OD/Baripada /SG/05
Total 1.830
Table 8.5:Year wise Plan for Service Levels Improvements

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Annual Targets

Total (Increment from the Baseline Value)

Proposed
Project Indicator8 Baseline9
Projects FY 2016 / 2015-
Cost in Cr
16 FY
FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
2017
H1 H2
Ongoing
0
Sewerage Project
Sewerage and
Septage
Management
1. Coverage of
latrines
73% 77% 81% 95% 100% 100% 100%
(individual or
community)

2. Coverage of
sewerage 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 100% 100%
network services

3. Efficiency of
Collection of 0% 0% 0% 0% 50% 100% 100%
Sewerage
4. Efficiency in
0% 0% 10% 10% 30% 60% 100%
treatment
Urban Transport
 Mission Management Information System
SECTOR WISE SLIP TEMPLATE: URBAN TRANSPORT
Under AMRUT Mission, Urban Transport components which are admissible are; Side- walks,
Foot-over bridges, Non-motorized transport (NMT), Buses, BRTS, Multi-level parking,
Waterways Ferry vessels Ferries and Waterways. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 3).

1. Service Level Gaps Assessment

1. SERVICE LEVEL STATUS
Assess the existing transportation situation and service levels gaps for indicators urban to
achieve service level benchmarks. (AMRUT Guidelines Table.1.4 & Table 2.5). Service Level
gaps will be analyzed as per indicators prescribed in Service Level Benchmarks (SLBs) for
urban transport of MoUD, GoI. Please provide information in 200 words responding to the
following questions;
1. Question: What is the baseline information available for improvement city transportation?
Whether City has prepared City Mobility Plan? If yes then, Does CMP includes NMT, Ferries,
waterways?
Answer:
A City Development Plan (CDP) has been prepared and is in the finalization process. A
Detailed Project Report (DPR) for City bus services has been prepared which elucidates the
future requirement of the city bus fleet and all other infrastructure required. There should be a
proposal for preparing a City Mobility Plan (CMP) in the near future which includes the study of
NMT.

There are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various indicators
as LOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s available
transportation services. The summary of the service level gap and performance should be
presented as per illustrative Table

Table: Service level Benchmark

Present Service
Sl. No Indicators Levels of Service as per SLB, MoUD
Level
Level of Service Range
1 >=1
Service Coverage of urban
1 2 0.7-1 4
transport in the city
3 0.3-0.7
4 <0.3
Level of Service Range
Availability of urban 1 >=0.6
2 transport per 1000 2 4
0.4-0.6
population
3 0..2-0.4
4 <=0.2
Question: Have level of services (LOS) been calculated based on the indicators prescribed in
the SLB for urban transport by Ministry of Urban Development? As per MoUD SLB for urban
transport, there are four Levels of Services (LOS) which will be calculated considering various
indicators as LOS1, LOS2, LOS3 and LOS4 correspond to adequacy and quality of city’s
available transportation services.
Answer: Yes
Question: While assessing the above indicators, also analyze following aspects as an
outcome of the broad components of urban transport under AMRUT;
a) Non-Motorised Transport Facilities
1. % of network covered
2. Encroachment on NMT roads by vehicle parking (%)
3. NMT parking facilities at interchanges (%)
Answer: No NMT Parking facilities available in Baripada.

b) Parking: Availability of parking spaces

Answer:
Authorised municipal parking spaces: Bus Stand,
Unauthorized parking spaces: Chowpadia, Station Bazar, Jagannatha Mandir Front, Ambika
Mandir Fronr, Gujuri, Balasore Golei, Bhanjapur Market Complex, Murgabadi Golei, Near
Shishu vidyalay,
Development of parking areas: Chowpadia, Station Bazar, Jagannatha Mandir Front,
Ambika Mandir Fronr, Gujuri, Balasore Golei, Bhanjapur Market Complex, Murgabadi Golei

Question: Have specific issues for the city been identified and addressed including issues with
the existing traffic, NMT, parking / transport environment?
Answer:
Encroachments on roads: Balasore Golei, Ambika Mandir, Gujur Bazar, Statin Bazar
Parking: Chowpadia, Station Bazar, Jagannatha Mandir Front, Ambika Mandir Fronr, Gujuri,
Balasore Golei, Bhanjapur Market Complex, Murgabadi Golei

Sidewalks, Foot-over bridges and NMT

Question: Do you think city roads are safe for pedestrians? If no then, which section of roads
needs immediate attention?
Answer:
No. the city roads are rather narrow and there are insufficient footpaths available for
pedestrians to walk. There are few proposals that are identified to improve pedestrianisation in
Baripada City:
Requirement of Pedestrian Walkways:- Murgaabadi Golei, Ambika Mandir Front, Balasore
Golei, Station Bazar, Gujur Bazar, Dargdabadi to Bus Stand

Question: What type of Non-Motortised Vehicle (NMV) infrastructure available in the city?
1. Lanes reserved for NMV
2. Footpath allocated for both pedestrian and NMV
3. Area allocated to NMV parking
Answer: No lanes or infrastructure available for NMT
Question: Has budget provision for NMT included in the transportation projects in the city?
Answer: No

Buses and BRTS

Question: Have city initiated feasibility of BRTS?
Answer: No

Question: What kind of public transport is available in the city? Please mention Number of
public transport vehicles operating in the city.
Answer: City Bus Services has been initialized and DPR for the same has been prepared. No
existing city buses are plying in the city.

Question: What is the total length of public transport corridor in the city limits?
Answer: NA

Multi-level parking
Question: Whether city has designated parking spaces? If yes, provide list of
Answer: No

Question: What is the total available on street paid parking spaces on Arterial, sub arterial
roads?
Answer: Bus Stand (1) on street paid parking spaces available
Availability of paid parking spaces
Total available on street paid parking spaces = (a) = 1
Total available on street Parking Spaces = (b) = 10
Availability of paid parking spaces = (a/b) *100 = 10%

Question: Whether parking supply inventory is available for the city including; Types of on-
road and off road parking restrictions (time)
Answer: No

Question: Whether parking facilities available for bicycles, auto rickshaw, goods delivery.
Answer: Parking facilities are not available for bicycles. For auto rickshaw parking, No
authorized auto rickshaw stations but there are unauthorized auto stands at Chowpadia,
Station Bazar, Jagannatha Mandir Front, Ambika Mandir Fronr, Gujuri, Balasore Golei,
Bhanjapur Market Complex, Murgabadi Golei

Question: Is private sector involved in parking?

Answer: No

Question: Whether adopted parking bans/restrictions on major roads .

Answer: Yes. Near Shishu vidyalay, Jagannath Mandir, Ambika Mandir
Waterways and Ferry vessels
If city has waterways system then provide following questions;
Question: Whether city has inland waterways system?
Answer: No Waterway System in available.

Question: Who is managing and operating the ferry system? if any

Answer: Ferry System in not available.

Question: Provide number of ferry vessels

Answer: Ferry System in not available.

Institutional Set Up
Describe the institutional framework including role and responsibilities in terms; administration
and Policy making, planning, Vehicle Registration, public transportation operators including
Private operators and overall traffic management.
Role and Responsibilities of all the agencies shall be provided in the illustrative table No. 2
Table: Role and responsibility of agencies involved in management of City transport
Sl. NO Agencies Responsibilities
1 PWD, Municipality Planning
2 Municipality City Bus Services
3 RTO, MAYURBHANJ Vehicle Registration
4 SP,MAYURBHANJ Traffic Management
5 SP, MAYURBHANJ Administrative and Policy Making

Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;

Question: Who is responsible for management of urban transport in the city?
Answer: Police/RTO/Municipal Authority, Under Process for City Bus Services

Question: Is there enough provisions for enforcement of traffic rules for pedestrian safety on
roads?
Answer: No. There are few proposals for Pedestrian walkways.

Question: How are you planning for execution of transport related projects for AMRUT,
whether, present role and responsibilities lying with these organizations is capable to
implement projects under AMRUT?
Answer: There is insufficient capacity to implement the projects. Most importantly, there is no
sufficient ROW of roads to propose the urban transport projects which needs to be overlooked.

1.2 Status of On-going Projects

Critically examine the existing and ongoing projects for improvement of urban transport as to
be filled in illustrative Table No.3
 Notice: Undefined index: table12_proposed_projects in
/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 312

Approved Cost Expenditure

Project/Sector Status of projects Scheme
(Rs. Lakhs) (Rs. Lakhs)
Road Improvement/ Widening
1. Bhanjpur Chak to Belgadia 1.50 BT Road with Bopth side CC 1. Under
State
2. Sports Hostel to Roxy via kacheri widening & RCC Road side Progress
Planning
Market. 200 Drain. 2. Completed

Road Improvement/ Widening 247

BT Road with Bopth side CC
1. KC Circle to Damadar Ghat . Under State
widening & RCC Road side
2. Saty Sahi School Chak to Balasore 145 Progress Planning
Drain
Galei
Purchase of City Buses under MoUD
Nil
Scheme
Non motorized Transport Nil
Street Parking Nil
Multi Level Parking Nil
Others Nil

Question: Whether convergence with other ongoing Central and State and Local Government
Programs/Schemes can be done at this stage.
Answer: Yes

Question: Whether ongoing scheme and projects has been critically reviewed? Please explain
what is the extent of convergence to bridge the gaps?
Answer: No

2. Bridging the Gap

Demand Gap Assessment
Despite the fact, non-motorized modes and public transit account for a significant proportion of
travel activity of a city. The city needs to pursue different strategies and programs for bridging
the gap on transportation facilities where the city is and where it wishes to go in future.
Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions
Question: What steps can be taken to bridge these gaps? Please explain in 200 words,
Answer:
Road Construction: Restoration and reconstruction of existing BT and CC roads based on
existing condition and type of pavement.
Road up-gradation: Construction of R.O.B at Baghru road and Station Bazar
Public Transportation: Provision for Intra-city Bus services and provision for eco-friendly
mode of transport.
Up-gradation of Bus Stand, Terminals: Inter-state Bus terminus with modern amenities near
Dargadi
Development of Pedestrian walkways and facilities: Construction of pedestrian pathways
and dividers, street furniture, introduction of cycle tracks along major roads
Development of Truck Terminal: Truck terminal with basic infrastructure facilities on side of
NH-18
Development of Auto and Rickshaw Stands: Chowpadia, Station Bazar, Jagannatha Mandir
Front, Ambika Mandir Fronr, Gujuri, Balasore Golei, Bhanjapur Market Complex, Murgabadi
Golei,
Development of parking areas: Provision of Multi-layer Car parking at market area
Regional Transport: Improvement of railway connection from Balasore to Baripada and
improvement and expansion of Baripada station with modern infrastructure facilities
Whether present level gaps as identified through SLB indicators will be achievable by 2021 as
compare with the present level of gap and demand?. (Table)
Table: Bridging the gap- Demand Assessment
Demand/
Sl. Present
Benchmark Levels of Service as per SLB, MoUD Current Gap Target by
No Service Level
2021
Level of
Range
Service
Service Coverage of
1 >=1
1 urban transport in the 4
city 2 0.7-1
3 0.3-0.7
4 <0.3

Level of
Range
Service
Availability of urban
2 transport per 1000 1 >=0.6 4
population 2 0.4-0.6
3 0..2-0.4
4 <=0.2
Other indicators
Percentage of City
3 Covered by footpaths -
wider than 1.2m
Non Motorised
4 Transport Facilities
including;
a) % of network covered -
Encroachment on NMT
b) roads by vehicle -
parking (%)
NMT parking facilities at
c) -
interchanges (%)
 Level of
Range
Service
Availability of On-street
5 paid public parking 1 >=75 4
spaces (%) 2 50-75
3 25-50
4 <25
6 Water ways and Ferries -

3. Objectives
The objective will lead to explore and examine viable alternatives options available to address
these gaps. These will include out of box approaches. (AMRUT Guidelines: para 6.4 & 6.8 &
6.9).
Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions;
Question: How will you define your overall goal to improve city transport?
Answer: The vision of the City Public Transport is “To provide safe, efficient and cost
effective multi modal transportation system accessible to all the citizens and compatible
with future land use of Baripada.”
Sector Goals:
 Development of easily available and affordable public transport.
 Encourage non-motorised transport by developing the pedestrian friendly road
infrastructure.
 Development of traffic management and monitoring system.
 Existing road improvement and construction of new roads to provide city wide linkages.
 Development of terminals along the radial roads to decongest the inner city area.
 Development of grade separation facility.
 Provision of Multi-layer Car parking at market area

Question: What possible strategies envisaged to achieve various LoS to improve the
transportation components under AMRUT?
Answer:
NMT: Construction of pedestrian pathways and dividers, street furniture, introduction of cycle
tracks along major roads
Parking: 1 Provision of Multi-layer Car parking at market area
Public Transport: Provision for Intra-city Bus services and provision for eco-friendly mode of
transport with Inter-state Bus terminus with modern amenities near Dargadi.
Question: How well does goals and objective for developing efficient urban transportation
facilities can articulate the use of NMT options and parking facilities to improve the quality of
life of local citizens?
Answer:
This is related with the optimal utilisation Right of Way of the Road. To cover this aspect, the
roads in the core area should be identified to encourage pedestrian walking facilities to limit the
movement of the vehicles in the congested areas which relates to the last mile connectivity.
 This would be achieved by providing the high frequency PT system with parking facilities at the
interchanges.
Question: How identified each objective can evolve considering bridging the gap with present
level of services as to achieve SLB indicators.
Answer: each identified objective needs to be assessed carefully and proposed with respect to
citizen and stakeholder consultation. The present level of service of every transport component
is inadequate and to enhance the same requires lot of funding and land availability. As there is
enough land for implementing off street parking and depots/terminals for City Bus Services,
land need to be identified to widen the most important roads so to ply the buses and increase
efficiency and accessibility to citizens.
Question: How objectives can be framed ensuring sustainable mobility solutions and creating
city-wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists.
Answer:
The objectives need to be framed in such a manner so to provide safe and secure way to
promote walkability and mobility to citizens. Improving main road structure and enforcing the
most congested and crowded zones of the city such as markets, mandis, old city areas,
railway station etc to convert them to NMT zones.
Question: Howe objectives for improvement of NMT facilities integrate with other modes of
transport.
Answer:
Presently, there is a proposal of city buses under City Bus Services connecting several
important areas. But still the demand would not be met for the overall citizens in the city. As we
know there is no existing NMT facility for the city, proposed pedestrian tracks should in future
be integrated to the existing CBS so to achieve the first and last mile connectivity.

4. Alternate Activities to Meet Objectives

Evolve overall objective is to ensure that mobility solutions for the city that are sustainable and
create city-wide NMT facilities for pedestrians and cyclists and integrate them with other
modes of transport. Suggest possible strategies and options to achieve each objective with
estimate cost of alternate solutions as per table 1 & Table 2
Table 1: Possible Strategies to meet objectives
Sl. Financing
Objectives Possible Activities
No Source
Barrier free
1 Construction of pedestrian pathways and dividers, street furniture PWD(R&B)
pedestrianisation
2 NMV Introduction of cycle tracks along major roads PWD(R&B)
Baripada
3 NMV Provision for eco-friendly mode of transport
Municipality
Provision for Intra-city and inter-city Bus services between Rainrangpur-
4 Public Transport PWD(R&B)
Baripada-Udala etc
5

Table 2: Estimated Cost for various possible activities (till 2019)

Sl. Total Cost
Projects Unit Quantity
No (in Crores)
1 Construction of pedestrian pathways and dividers, street furniture kms 10 6.00
2 Introduction of cycle tracks along major roads kms 5 4.00
3 Road Improvements 6 3 Cores Per Unit 18.00
4 Street Parking 7 0.10 Cores per Unit 0.70
5 Development of Transport Nagar 1 0.75 Cores 0.75
6 Over Bridges 1 15 Cores 15.00
7 Bus Depots and Truck terminal 1 20 Cores 20.00

While addressing alternate solution to achieve these objects, please provide information in 500
words responding to the following questions:
Question: How realistic and feasible urban transport strategies are to be evolved to address
key challenges, priorities as an outcome of the citizen consultation
Answer: With respect to the citizen and stakeholder consultation, there are several actions
that need to be addressed to improve the city wide transportation scenario. Mostly
improving/widening/upgradation of roads, improved network of CBS, installation of NMT
facilities at congested areas, development of truck terminal, parking areas and rickshaw areas
etc

Question: What alternative innovative solution can be adopted for improving the service
delivery by creating
a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, road
marking and signages
Answer: Vehicle tracking System, automatic pedestrian crossing facility,

b: pathways
Answer: Urban planning with built-in street design,

c: Parking
Answer: Multilevel parking spaces, Zoning near the congested areas to promote NMT

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Vehicle tracking System, Surveillance System, GIS based traffic analysis (real-time),
Signanisation,

Question: What strategic intervention is required in the implementation of above projects

Answer: Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), Traffic Management Committees or agencies etc
appointed to overlook and undertake the specific tasks related to the transport criteria.

Question: Whether alternative modes of transport such as cycling can be provided in major
roads
Answer: Not in the existing situation. If the roads are widened and upgraded enough then
there would be scope to identify cycling tracks
 Question: Whether non-Motorised Transport (NMT) facilities corridor suggested with
dedicated NMV, Cycle track and Signalized Intersection count.
Answer: No
Question: How innovative solutions for alternative modes of transport including NMT such as
cycling, pedestrian and public transportation system will address the overall transportation
issue of the city?
Answer: this would shape the future city transportation in such a way to improve mobility of
the city with barrier free pedestrian movement and enhanced levels of safety and security.

Question: What will be the source of funding for identified project?

Answer: Central, State, ULB and community Participation and funding from other development
agencies through pooling of resources.

Question: Whether convergence with other scheme has been made. Please explain each
identified projects and their source of funding such as AMRUT, 14th FC and also converge
with other schemes.
Answer: No

5. Citizen Engagement
Each alternative will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be prioritized
to meet the service level gaps. The section will summarize the Citizens priorities for adoption
of alternate solution of urban mobility, drawing on SLIP preparation.
Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:
Question: Have all stakeholders including residents (RWAs), Transporters, RTOs, Traffic
Police attended the citizen consultation?
Answer: Yes.

Question: Has alternate proposed crowd sourced?

Answer: Yes. Crowd and stakeholder sourced.

Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?

Answer: the most important criteria for citizens is enhancing the public transport which can
cater to almost all the areas of the city. Secondly, to designate various parking spaces so to
decongest the main roads.

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
Answer: Yes

Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?

Answer: Studying the entire area and identifying the loopholes in the service provision.
 Question: How citizen has been exposed best practices and smart solutions in order to
generate citizen-driven solutions for urban mobility?
Answer: Through presentations and seminars.

Question: Please examine whether identified solutions are addressing citizens requirement
Answer: Yes

Question: Whether ULB have adequate resources to implement prioritized alternate

solutions?
Answer: No.

Question: How innovative alternate options of NMT facilities examined and shared with
citizens?
Answer: Yes. Through presentations and study material.

6. Prioritization of projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based
on the available resources to meet the respective objective. (AMRUT Guidelines; para 6.6, 6.7
& 7.2). Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:
Question: Are innovative solution prioritized based on the available resources and demand of
citizens?
Answer: Yes.

Question: Has source of funding considered while prioritizing the project?

Answer: Yes
Question: Whether project has been prioritized considering last mile connectivity?
Answer: No
Table 1: Possible Strategies to meet objectives

Priority Cost (in Financing

Project (till 2030)
No Cr.) Source
Restoration and reconstruction of existing BT and CC roads based on existing Baripada
1 75.00
condition and type of pavement Municipality
2 Construction of R.O.B at Baghru Road 10.00 PWD(R&B)
3 Construction of R.O.B at Station Bazar 10.00 PWD(R&B)
4 DPR for City Mobility Plan 0.50 Municipality
5 Construction of pedestrian pathways and dividers, street furniture 6.00 PWD(R&B)
6 Introduction of cycle tracks along major roads 4.00 PWD(R&B)
7 Inter-state Bus terminus with modern amenities near Dargadi 70.00 PWD(R&B)
8 Truck terminal with basic infrastructure facilities 50.00 PWD(R&B)
Provision for Intra-city and inter-city Bus services between Rainrangpur-Baripada- PWD(R&B)
9 2.50
Udala etc
Baripada
10 Provision for eco-friendly mode of transport 0.40
Municipality
Baripada
11 Provision of Multi-layer Car parking at market area 60.00
Municipality
Total 288.40
7. Out of Box Solution Used
Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:
Question: What are the out of box thinking on alternative and new innovative solutions for the
following;
a: Citizen friendly provision of barrier free pedestrian facilities including, footpaths, road
marking and signages,
Answer: Escalators and underpasses for pedestrian movement, solar lighting and panels for
signages and road marking.

b: pathways
Answer: Escalators and travelators for pedestrian movement

c: parking
Answer: Automated Valet System, Mobile integrated citizen info systems, parking line alarms,

d: traffic management using ITS

Answer: Real Time Vehicle tacking using Saetllite imagery

Question: Whether solution provided to improve the safety of vulnerable groups such as old
age/handicapped/children
Answer: Yes

8. Conditionalities Fulfilled and Resilience Built-in

First and foremost condition is to identify the availability of land for projects such as parking,
widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone. Further, agencies need to be
brought on board for any new initiatives as part of convergence process and necessary
approval and permissions.
Please provide information in 200 words responding to the following questions:
Question: Whether described the conditionalities of each project in terms of availability of land
parking, widening of roads for pedestrian, cycle tracks and hawkers zone?
Answer: Yes. Government lands are available.
Question: How these projects will be funded? Are projects being implemented through own
sources or borrowing then which is the commitment in this regard.
Answer: Both sources are considered. This can be done through Central, State, ULB and
community Participation and funding from other development agencies through pooling of
resources.
Question: Has environmental obligation such as clearances and NOC required? Please
suggest action and initiatives need to be taken in this regards
Answer: No
9. Financial Plan
Prepare Financial Plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development. The financial
plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State, ULBs and)
including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. Describe briefly the institutional
arrangement), leveraging potential partnerships, convergence with other Government
Schemes, monitoring and evaluation and also provide year-wise milestones and outcomes.
 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating
infrastructure projects? Explain in 200 words how these institutional
arrangements are leveraging partnership and converge with government
scheme and provide list of individual projects which is being financed by
various stakeholders.
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant. Since the ULB
do not have the financial capability, no share has been considered from ULBs.

 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial

convergence and consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered under
other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been planned for
projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded under AMRUT on
50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required. However, consultation for
involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the objective of the mission.

 What are the different sources of funding being tapped for this project.(75
words)
Own Source, PPP mode and CSR source of funding will be tapped

 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether

project has been categorized based on financial considerations (100
words)
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to contribute
required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these projects will be met
from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects have been categorized
based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required under AMRUT scheme.

 Have the financial assumptions been listed out? Please provide the list.
(100 words)
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.

10. Finalization of Master Service Level Improvement Plan

Question: Discuss Draft Master Service Level Improvement Plan with citizen. Based on the
final citizen consultations, prepare final Master Service Level Improvement Plan. Annual Plan
will be prepared as an application for monitoring the improvement in achieving the service level
indicators as targeted in the Service level improvement plan. (AMRUT Guideline; Table 2.1,
2.2, 2.3., 2.4 and 2.5) and Annual Plan (AMRUT Guidelines; Annexure-2, 3, 4, 5& 6)
Answer:
Details in financial plan shall be provided as per table 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 and 8.5. These tables
are based on amrut guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.
MASTER SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS DURING MISSION PERIOD
Physical Change in Service Levels Estimated Cost (in
Sl. No Project Name
Components Indicator Existing Proposed lakhs)
Restoration and
reconstruction of
existing BT and CC
1 Pavements 75.00
roads based on
existing condition and
type of pavement
Construction of R.O.B
2 ROB 10.00
at Baghru Road
Construction of R.O.B
3 ROB 10.00
at Station Bazar
DPR for City Mobility DPR for feasibility
4 0.50
Plan study
Construction of
pedestrian pathways Pathways, dividers,
5 6.00
and dividers, street street furniture
furniture
Introduction of cycle Cycle tracks, street
6 tracks along major furniture, road 4.00
roads markings, signals
Inter-state Bus Depot/Terminal,
terminus with modern passenger facilities,
7 70.00
amenities near Parking, Staff
Dargadi buildings,
Truck terminal with
Parking areas, Staff
8 basic infrastructure 50.00
buildings,
facilities
Provision for Intra-city
Depot/Terminal,
and inter-city Bus
passenger facilities,
9 services between 2.50
Parking, Staff
Rainrangpur-Baripada-
buildings,
Udala etc
Provision for eco-
10 friendly mode of 0.40
transport
Provision of Multi-layer
Parking Building,
11 Car parking at market 60.00
Security Systems,
area
Total 288.40
ANNUAL FUND SHARING PATTERN FOR TRANSPORT PROJECTS
(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines) (Amount in Rs. Cr)
Notice: Undefined index: table7_sno in
/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.php On line 917
Sl. Total Project Share
Name of Project
No Cost GoI State ULB Others Total
Construction of Multilevel Parking at Market Area
1 5.00 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/01)
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility Plan (CMP)
2 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/02)
Construction of pedestrian pathways and dividers,
3 street furniture 6.00 3.00 3.00 6.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/03)
Construction of cycle tracks along major roads
4 4.00 2.00 2.00 4.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/04)
Construction of Truck terminal with basic
5 infrastructure facilities 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/05)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet - Rainrangpur-
6 Baripada-Udala etc 10.00 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/06)
Introduction of Eco-friendly mode of transport
7 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8 3.00 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/08)
Construction of Inter-state Bus terminus with
9 modern amenities near Dargadi 20.00 10.00 10.00 20.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/09)
Total 59.00 29.50 29.50 59.00
 ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK-UP FOR TRANSPORT PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Notice: Undefined index: table8_sno in
/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransportresult.php
On line 973

State ULB
Sl. Conver Oth
Project GoI 14th Oth 14th Oth To Total
No Total gence ers
FC ers FC ers tal
Construction of Multilevel Parking at
1 Market Area 2.50 2.50 5.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/01)
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility Plan
2 (CMP) 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/02)
Construction of pedestrian pathways and
3 dividers, street furniture 3.00 3.00 6.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/03)
Construction of cycle tracks along major
4 roads 2.00 2.00 4.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/04)
Construction of Truck terminal with basic
5 infrastructure facilities 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/05)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet -
6 Rainrangpur-Baripada-Udala etc 5.00 5.00 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/06)
Introduction of Eco-friendly mode of
7 transport 0.25 0.25 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8 1.50 1.50 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/08)
Construction of Inter-state Bus terminus
9 with modern amenities near Dargadi 10.00 10.00 20.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/09)
29.50 29.50 59.00
YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)

Notice: Undefined index: table9_proposed_projects in
/var/www/html/amrut/urbantransport-result.php on line 1033

Annual Targets
Ba (Increment from the Baseline Value)
Sl. Project
Proposed Projects Indicator seli FY 2016 FY
No Cost FY FY FY
ne
H1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020
Construction of Multilevel Parking at Market
1 5.00
Area (AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/01)
Preparation of DPR on City Mobility Plan (CMP)
2 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/02)
Construction of pedestrian pathways and
3 dividers, street furniture 6.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/03)
Construction of cycle tracks along major roads
4 4.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/04)
Construction of Truck terminal with basic
5 infrastructure facilities 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/05)
Augmentation of City Bus fleet - Rainrangpur-
6 Baripada-Udala etc 10.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/06)
Introduction of Eco-friendly mode of transport
7 0.50
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/07)
Construction of Foot Over Bridges
8 3.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/08)
Construction of Inter-state Bus terminus with
9 modern amenities near Dargadi 20.00
(AMRUT/OD/BARIPADA/UT/09)
Urban Transport
 Mission Management Information System

PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS

The objective of this template is to assist ULBs in preparation of SLIP for Green Space and Parks
component for rejuvenation of at least one park in each of the 500 Urban Local Bodies (ULBs)
involving creation and upgradation of basic elements, especially for the youth, children and the
elderly. Rejuvenation also includes involving local citizens and groups in the maintenance and
upkeep of the park in order to make the development sustainable. Cost of this component will be
met from the 2.5 per cent annual allocation for development of parks under the Mission and used in
accordance with its Guidelines. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines: Section 5.1 Sr.No.6, 6.7 & Annexure-1
Sr.No.4) SLIP would involve write up on following sections:

1. Assess the Service Level Gap

First and foremost aspect of SLIP is to assess the existing situation and service levels gaps for
organised Green Space and Parks based on standards prescribed in URDPFI Guidelines (Refer
AMRUT Guidelines; Para 3.1.6 & 6.2). This shall also include describing existing institutional
framework vis-à-vis development and maintenance of organised green space/ parks. In order to
assess the service level gap the City shall have to review all policies, plans; scheme documents
etc., hold discussions with concerned officials and citizens, as per the requirement and conduct
physical assessment of city parks to understand the current status (Refer Indicative Parks
Assessment Tool as given in Annex-1 of this document). The city should undertake overall
assessment of Parks and Open/ Green Space in terms of a) Physical Activities Resources, b)
Family Facilities including child friendly play equipment’s, c) Available General Services and
Facilities, and, d) Aesthetics and other
While discussing about the existing status of the organised green space in your city make a sincere
effort to analyze the proportion of area under the categorization of parks as per URDPFI Guidelines
eg: Housing Area Park (HAP), Neighbourhood Park (NP) Community Park (CP), District Park (DP),
and Sub-City Park (SCP). Also focus on qualitative aspects of existing parks like geographical
distribution across the city, encroachments, child and elderly friendly features; staffing, maintenance
& equipment issues; and maintenance by RWAs/ Corporate under their CSR Activities etc.

Please respond to the questions given below (Word Limit: 800 words).
Question: What are the available data sources/ plans/ reports/ schemes that exist as regards
development and maintenance of parks?
BARIPADA municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the
park, area, O&M costs and brief description about the parks. But the existing parks are developed
with the help of state government and maintenance of the parks is covered in the municipal
expenditure.

Question: Review the recommendation on open/ green space as per Master Plan/
Development Plan and map existing green cover against the same. Identify the areas where
there is deficiency of open/green space
The referred document CDP which provide the 1.73% land use and stating that green spaces have
to be developed in the city but there is no document where the deficiency of open/green spaces
identified to fill the gap but there no map showing the existing green space locations for the city.
Question: Does the ULB follow URDPFI Guidelines to categorize its organized greens/ parks/
open space or follow its own categorization? If ULB follow its own categorization, what is
the rationale and how well they are interlinked to development of parks?
Baripada Municipal Corporation do not categorize the parks and open spaces as per the hierarchy
of organized green spaces based on population and area criteria as prescribed by URDPFI
guidelines it only categorizes parks in developed and undeveloped category .

Question: What is the per person open space availability in the city in general and within
built-up areas?
13.838 hectares is the cumulative area of developed parks in the BARIPADA town including open
spaces and playgrounds spread over the city for children’s to play and elders to take a fresh walk in
the morning but these play grounds and not equipped with any amenities.

Service Level Status

Sr. Present Reliability

Indicators Benchmark Source
No Status Factors

Per person open space in plain areas as per URDPFI guidelines 0.99 sq m 10-12 sq m C

Source: URDPFI–2014 & Analysis of ULB Level Data

Question: Have the ULB/ City prepared park wise inventory of facilities and amenities? (ULB
should identify some of the quick-win parks, which could be developed with minimal
intervention that can attract good number of citizens)
BARIPADA municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks such as name of the
park, area, O&M costs and brief description about the parks apart from this they identified few parks
for renovation which can attract a lot of people to use the parks and enhancing children friendly
features identified by the municipality will make them quick-win parks.

Question: How is the physical condition of parks in the city? Do they have boundary wall,
fenced area, facilities of public conveniences, tube well, dustbins etc. (Mention in
proportions, if possible)
Parks in BARIPADA municipality are in good physical condition overall , nevertheless…parks lack
in toilet facility and park furniture is not in a good shape .

Question: Whether parks have well planned play area encouraging physical activity? Are
they equipped with child friendly play equipments, snack/ ice cream parlours/ kiosks etc.
(Mention in proportions, if possible?)
As per the data provided by the municipality all the parks have the dedicated play area to an extent
of 60 to 70% and Kiosks are not provided in any of the park

Question: How well aesthetics component have been built in parks of your city? Are they
well illuminated, landscaped – manicured with water bodies/ fountains etc. wherever
possible? (Mention proportions, if possible)
Parks in BARIPADA municipality are in decent aesthetic condition overall, nevertheless all the
parks has shortage of landscape and park furniture is not in a good shape. All the parks has no
electricity, water supply, toilet, compost and parking space.
Question: Are there some running schemes/ projects – Central/ State/ Donor funded in the
city as regard development of parks/ open spaces? Or else ULB is funding park
development of parks/ green space out of its own budget?
Development of open spaces, green spaces and parks in Baripada are done with the help of state
government and maintenance of the parks is covered by the municipal fund

Question: Explain the process how a park/ open space is normally shortlisted for
development? Does the city have rationale for park selection for development or it is done
on ad-hoc basis.
BARIPADA municipality shortlists the parks/open spaces in a unique process as follows
1. Identification of government lands in the city
2. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage
3. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park
4. Stakeholder consultation by the municipal engineers
5. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts
6. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counsellors shortlists parks for
development.

Question: List the organizations/ authorities/ private sector firms etc. and describe their
roles and responsibilities in development of city parks/ open space along with green area
under their jurisdiction.
No such private sector firms /organizations are involved in the development or maintenance of any
park in the city, all the parks are under the municipal authority and they operate and maintain.

Question: Where can new parks be developed in the future; how much space may be
available.
BARIPADA municipality has identified few government lands in the municipal jurisdiction where
there is a need for parks but the land is under the state body which has to be transferred to the
municipality so that they can plan and execute the projects

Question: How much is allocated under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or
Master Plan for new areas?
From the data given given by the municipality on the existing parks and playgrounds the land use
1.73 % and stating that green spaces have to be developed in the city but there is no allocated
under Parks/ Open/ Recreational space as per the DP or Master Plan for new areas.

Question: Who manages the parks in the city? How much delegation of responsibility has
been given to RWAs and/or NGOs?
Parks are undertaken by the municipal Corporation, no NGO’s delegation of responsibility has been
given.

Question: Which parks have uneasy accessibility issues or get flooded/water logged etc.?
All the existing parks are easy to access and there is no such problem of flooding/water logging etc
transpired in the parks.
Question: Does the ULB have any guidelines for providing safe and secure access to parks
for children and elders?
Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the internal
technical experts with regard to safety, security and universal accessibility measures taken in the
design and then finalize the plan for execution which makes parks in BARIPADA safe and secure
for all age groups.

Question: Is there a system for preventing the entry of animals into parks?
All the existing parks in the BARIPADA municipality are with the boundary wall so there is not even
a single event occurred in the past few years that the animals entering the parks.

Question: Does the city have any guidelines for horticulture; types of trees and plants, etc?
City has not specifically followed any guidelines for horticulture or selecting type of trees or plants
.the plan given by the landscape architect is followed and implemented on field because of
shortage of capacity in that sector.

Table2: Jurisdiction wise–Allocation of Green Space and Parks

Proportion (in
Sr. No Jurisdiction No. of Parks Area of Parks (in hec)
Percentage)

1 ULB 8 13.8

2 Development Authority 0 0 0

Private Ownership -
3 0 0 0
Corporate/NGO's

Total 8 13.8 1.73

Table3: Hierarchy of Organised Greens in the City (AsperURDPFI-2014)

Area under the % Area under parks and
Sr. No Category No. of Parks
category (in hec) open spaces
1 Housing Area Park (HAP) (Less than 5000 Sq.m.) 2 0.05 0

2 Neighbourhood Park (NP)(5000 -10000 sq.m.) 2 0.15 0

0.3
3 Community Park (CP) (10000 - 50000 sq.m 1 0

4 District Park (DP) (50000 – 250000 Sq.m.) 2 1.95 0

5 Sub-City Park (SCP) (2,50,000 sq.m. & above ) 1 2.43 0

2. Bridge the Gap

Once the gap between the existing Service Levels is computed, list out initiatives undertaken in
different ongoing programs/ projects/ master – development plans to address these gaps. While
bridging the gaps convergence with other ongoing Central, State and Local Government Programs/
Schemes will also be looked into. Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps
(AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.3, Annexure-2; Table 2.1). Each of the identified objectives will be
evolved from the outcome of physical assessment of parks using “Assessment Tools for Parks”
(Refer Annex-1 of this document) and meeting the opportunity to bridge the gap.

As per para 5.1 (Sr.No.6) of AMRUT guidelines all projects involving development of green spaces
& parks shall have to make special provision for child friendly components and establish a system
of maintenance with local residents participation. At least one park from each of the 500 ULBs
under AMRUT would be taken up for developing facilities for Children, Youth and Elderly.
Assessment of the current status of City parks/ open spaces would clearly bring out the gap/ dearth
of open spaces in terms of area allocation, having inadequate citizen friendly features and issues
pertaining to its maintenance. And these will lead to formulation of three broad objectives.
Please respond to the following questions in not more than 500 words

Question: Have the city took physical assessment of city parks? (ULB’s may refer Annex-1
indicative procurement of this document).

Question: Estimate the demand gap of open/green space in the city

Question: Explain how the city plans to fill the gap in green cover and progressively
enhance green cover within City to 15% over next 5 years. ?
BARIPADA municipality has done elementary tabulation of the existing parks and decided to
construct a park every year and renovate the existing facilities so that they can fill the gap in green
cover and within next decade green cover in the city will be close to 15 %.

Question: Assess and describe, if requisite provisions as per Master Plan and other
State legislation have already been made?

No requisite provisions as per Master Plan and other State legislation have already been made

Question: Explain the city’s action plans to make special provisions for installing child
friendly components in the city parks as per AMRUT Guidelines. ?

Lacks in child friendly components the municipality is planning to renovate the park apart from that
all the new proposed parks are with child friendly components.

Question: Provide details of the initiatives undertaken in different ongoing programs and
projects to address the gaps in enhancing the green cover and rejuvenation/ development of
parks. Provide information in Table 4.

There are no ongoing projects in this sector as the city is concerned

Tabel4: Status of Ongoing/Sanctioned/Committed Projects

Name of the Month of Status (as on dd mm

Sr. No. Scheme Name Cost in Rs. Lakhs
Project Completion 2015)
OBJECTIVES
Based on above, objectives will be developed to bridge the gaps. While developing
objectives following question shall be responded so as to arrive at appropriate objective.
Question: Please provide a set of 2-3 objectives to meet the gap in not more than 100 words.
1. Installation of child friendly equipment
2. Image of wild life to be conserved
3. Urban greenery in prioritization through plantation on both sides of all pivot routes
4. Identification of huge vacant lands in the city to build parks
3. Examine Alternatives and Estimate Cost
Suggest alternatives/ options to complete the ongoing projects pertaining to developing
parks and green spaces. Identify quick-win parks and open space which can also have play
area and associated facilities for Children, Youth & Elderly. Also identify & describe the
prevailing models of parks development & maintenance in your city? Any new model your
city wishes to adopt? (Word Limit: 200 Words)
City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks as
part of corporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by them in the city .these
are in the stages of discussion but under implementation

Table 4: Cost Estimates for Park Development

Sr. No. Component Rate Amount in Rs.
1 Boundary wall 2000 800000
2 Jogging track 800 560000
3 Gate 200000 200000
4 Parking 500 100000
5 fountain 250000 250000
6 Toilet 200000 200000
7 Gazebo 100000 100000
8 Stone Pillars and Sculpture 30000 30000
9 Garden Bench/Sitting 10000 100000
10 Lawn 150 450000
11 Shade loving foliage Plants 300 900
12 Climbers over pergolas 500 1500
13 Foliage and Flowering shrubs 500 2500
14 Gate Light 20000 20000
15 Bollard Light Beside Jogging Track 10000 10000
16 Boundary Light 40000 40000
17 Focus Light 15000 15000
18 Coffee Stall 75000 75000
19 Snacks Centre 75000 75000
20 sliders 250000 250000
21 See-saw 250000 250000
22 Swing 200000 200000
23 Areal Stroller 75000 75000
Grand Total 3804900
As per AMRUT guidelines half of Rs. Cr. may be sought from Government of India under the
scheme and balance could be explored and converged from other sources like 14th Finance
Commission, State Government (Park Development Fund) and CSR Activities of Corporate Groups
active in the City.
4. Citizen Engagement
ULBs will organize and conduct city level citizen consultation and receive feedback on the
suggested alternatives and innovations. Each alternative pertaining to development and
maintenance models for parks will be discussed with citizens and activities to be taken up will be
prioritized to meet the service level gaps. ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up
based on the available resources. (Refer AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.6, 6.7 & 7.2). Please explain
following questions detailing out the needs, aspirations and wishes of the local people. (Word Limit:
250 Words)

Question: Has all relevant stakeholders groups been involved in the consultation?
Private architects are hired for designing the parks and then the plans are reviewed by the internal
technical experts and then the discussions are carried out to the all relevant stakeholders groups

Question: Explore option for O&M Contracts including PPPP with (RWAs/ Citizens Groups/
Corporate Groups – CSR, Selling advertisement rights etc.).
City is trying to incorporate the industries surrounded by to take reasonability and develop parks as
part of corporate social responsibility to compensate the pollution created by tm in the city .these
are in the stages of discussion but under implementation. Scope for exploring Selling of
Advertisement rights is under process.

Question: Explain how the city plans to establish a system of maintenance with active
citizen’s engagement as per AMRUT Guidelines.
Residents Committee of the Housing Colony area will be involved for maintenance of Parks.

Question: Has ward/ zone level consultations held in the city

Ward level consultations are done after the stakeholder consultation and they are used for
prioritization of the projects

Question: Has alternatives explored are crowd sourced?

No
Question: What is feedback on the suggested alternatives and innovations?
3 times consultation programs were held under the chairmanship of, Baripada bfor development of
BARIPADA town all the feedbacks and suggestions are considered in planning the parks

Question: Has alternative taken up for discussions are prioritized on the basis of
consultations?
No, it is not done based on consultation initially, all the technical aspects are considered by
engineers & the Administrator.
Question: What methodology adopted for prioritizing the alternatives?
BARIPADA Municipal Corporation prioritizes the parks/open spaces in an exclusive process as
follows
1. Gap analysis based on the existing parks coverage
2. Initial prioritization based on the size and coverage of the park
3. Citizen consultation and enlightening them with the facts and ask their priorities
4. Finally considering all the above aspects the chairperson and counselors prioritizes parks
for development
5. Prioritize Projects
Based on the citizen engagement, ULB will prioritize these activities and their scaling up based on
the available resources to meet the respective objectives. While prioritizing projects, please reply
following questions (Word Limit: 100 Words)
Question: What are the sources of funds?
The funds are divided into three parts
1. Construction of parks 50% from AMRUT(GOI)
2. Construction of parks 50% from STATE GOVERNMENT
3. O&M cost by ULB 100%
Question: Has projects been converged with other program and scheme
No
Question: Has projects been prioritized based on “more with less” approach?
YES the projects undertaken are prioritized based on “more with less” approach in such a way that
we spend less money and coverage is more .

6. Conditionalities
1.1 Describe the Conditionality’s of each project in terms of availability of land,
environmental & social obligation and clearances, required NOC, financial commitment,
approval and permission needed to implement the project. Required approvals will be
sought from competent authority and organizations. (Word Limit: 100 words)
BARIPADA municipality has identified few government lands/Open space as per Master Plan of
the Development Authority in the municipal jurisdiction where there is a need for parks but the land
is under the state body which has to be transferred to the municipality so that they can plan and
execute the projects if provided funds on time by the state & central government, and approval of
DPR by the apex committee

7. Resilience
The resilience factor would be built in to ensure environmentally sustainable, safe and secured park
development schemes. Ensure use of rust free sturdy steel structures for child and elderly friendly
features. (Word Limit: 100 words)
Plans are reviewed by the internal technical experts with regard to safety, security and universal
accessibility measures taken in the design and then finalize the plan for execution which makes
parks in BARIPADA safe and secure for all age groups. And the materials used considering there
sustainability in mind .
8. Financial Plan
Once the activities are finalized and prioritized after consultations, investments both in terms of
capital cost and O&M cost has to be estimated. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 6.5) Based on the
investment requirements, different sources of finance have to be identified. Financial Plan for the
complete life cycle of the prioritized development will be prepared. (AMRUT Guidelines; Para 4, 6.6,
6.12, 6.13 & 6.14). The financial plan will include percentage share of different stakeholders
(Centre, State and City) including financial convergence with various ongoing projects. While
preparing finance plan please reply following questions (Word Limit: 100 words)
 How the proposed finance plan is structured for transforming and creating
infrastructure projects?
The financial plan is made considering 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 List of individual project which is being financed by various stakeholders?
All the projects listed are planned under AMRUT on the basis of 50 % Central grant and
50% state grant.
 Has financial plan prepared for identified projects based on financial convergence
and consultation with funding partners?
Yes, the project identified here does not include the ongoing projects which are covered
under other scheme. Therefore, financial convergence from other schemes has not been
planned for projects listed under this scheme. Since all the identified projects are funded
under AMRUT on 50: 50 basis. Consultation with other funding partners is not required.
However, consultation for involving other funding partners will be explored to achieve the
objective of the mission.
 Is the proposed financial structure is sustainable? If so then whether project has
been categorized based on financial considerations?
Yes, the financial structure proposed is sustainable. The state govt. is committed to
contribute required funds for completing the projects. However, the O&M cost for these
projects will be met from internal resources including collection of user charges. The projects
have been categorized based on gap analysis identified for universal coverage as required
under AMRUT scheme.
 Have the financial assumptions been listed out?
Yes, the financial assumption has been listed to work out the operational sustainability.
 Does financial plan for the complete life cycle of the prioritized development?
Yes, the financial plan takes care of both CAPEX and OPEX costs to ensure sustenance
throughout the life cycle of all projects identified in SLIP.
 Does financial plan include percentage share of different stakeholders (Centre, State,
ULBs and)?
Yes, the financial plan is based on 50 % Central grant and 50% state grant.
 Does it include financial convergence with various ongoing projects?
Yes, it includes financial and physical convergence with various ongoing projects under
different schemes supported by both Central & State grant.
 Does it provide year-wise milestones and outcomes?
Yes, it has been provided
 Details in financial plan shall be provided as per Table 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 2.10 and 2.11. These tables are
based on AMRUT guidelines tables 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, and 2.5.

MASTER SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS DURING MISSION PERIOD

(AsperTable2.2ofAMRUTguidelines) (Amount in Rs.Cr)
Sr. Change in Service Levels
Physical Estimated
No Project Name Existing After
Components Indicator Cost (Cr)
. (As -Is) (To - be)
Construction of Park in Baripada
1 near thakurani sahi up school - 0.35
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/01
Construction of Park in Baripada
2 near buuguda kota - 0.15
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/02
Construction of Park in Baripada
3 near Sripada Gonja park - 4.21
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/03
Construction of Park in Baripada
4 near suna muni bagdia - 1.94
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/04
Construction of Park in Baripada
5 near near jotis adv nivas - 0.37
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/05
Construction of Park in Baripada
6 nearNear police staff quarters - 0.35
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/06

ANNUAL FUND SHARING BREAK_UP FOR PARKS and PLAY GROUND PROJECTS

(As per Table 2.3.2 of AMRUT guidelines)

Sr. Project GOI State ULB Converg oth Total
No 14th Others Total 14th Other Total ence ers
Fc Fc s
Construction of Park in Baripada near
1 thakurani sahi up school - 0.17 0.17 0.35
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/01
Construction of Park in Baripada near
2 buuguda kota - 0.13 0.13 0.15
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/02
Construction of Park in Baripada near
3 Sripada Gonja park - 2.11 2.11 4.21
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/03
Construction of Park in Baripada near suna
4 0.97 0.97 1.94
muni bagdia - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/04
Construction of Park in Baripada near near
5 jotis adv nivas - 0.19 0.19 0.37
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/05
Construction of Park in Baripada nearNear
6 police staff quarters - 0.18 0.18 0.35
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/06
ANNUAL FUND SHARING PATTERN FOR PARKS AND GREEN SPACE PROJECTS
(As per Table 2.3.1 of AMRUT guidelines)
(Amount in Rs. Cr)

Sr. Total Project

Name of the Project
No. Cost (Cr) GOI State ULB Others Total

Construction of Park in Baripada near thakurani sahi

1 0.27 0.17 0.17 0.35
up school - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/01

Construction of Park in Baripada near buuguda kota

2 0.15 0.75 0.75 0.15
- AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/02

Construction of Park in Baripada near Sripada

3 4.21 2.11 2.11 4.21
Gonja park - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/03
Construction of Park in Baripada near suna muni
4 1.94 0.97 0.97 1.94
bagdia - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/04
Construction of Park in Baripada near near jotis adv
5 0.37 0.19 0.19 0.37
nivas - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/05

Construction of Park in Baripada nearNear police

6 0.35 0.18 0.18 0.35
staff quarters - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/06

YEAR WISE PLAN FOR SERVICE LEVELS IMPROVEMENTS

(As per Table 2.5of AMRUT guidelines)
Annual targets (Increments form the
Project Indic Baseli baseline value)
Proposed Project FY 2016
Cost ator ne FY FY FY FY
H1 H2 2017 2018 2019 2020
Construction of Park in Baripada near thakurani sahi up
school - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/01 0.35
Construction of Park in Baripada near buuguda kota -
AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/02 0.15
Construction of Park in Baripada near Sripada Gonja
park - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/03 4.21
Construction of Park in Baripada near suna muni bagdia
- AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/04 1.94
Construction of Park in Baripada near near jotis adv
nivas - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/05 0.37
Construction of Park in Baripada nearNear police staff
quarters - AMRUT/OD/Baripada/PR/06 0.35

Annex-1: Indicative Assessment Tools for Parks (Indicative – ULBs can have its own assessment
tool as per the requirement or customize this tool to suit its need)