Crime Invest Igation
Crime Invest Igation
INTRODUCTION
1. Crime Prevention – police operation tasks through program to pre-empt the commission of any infraction or
violation of law. This is known as the first defense of police work.
2. Crime Investigation – second defense of police work, when all pre-emptive programs of the organization fails,
crime investigation as a function materializes to address the violation.
Criminal Investigation is an art or process in the identification, location and collection of physical evidences
through scientific means in order to establish conviction or exoneration from an accusation in a court of law.
( O’hara & O’hara – italics supplied)
Criminal Investigation as an art or process therefore endeavors the investigator to do his tasks at his utmost with
sincerity and interests to search evidence and establish facts for an “air tight” case. As the saying goes, “the
investigator is the soul of the case, because if he does his home work well, justice is served”.
       It has always been said that investigation is dependent on the character of the investigator to do his
homework coupled by his qualities, breadth of interest, training and experience.
         Our criminal justice system premised its resolution of cases on existing rigid laws (rule on evidence) and
often the dismissal of criminal cases on grounds of insufficiency of evidence or merely technicalities are blamed on
the investigator.
        Criminal jurisprudence encourages the investigators to value physical evidences – being a part of
circumstantial evidence when offered in court becomes a corroborative
          This research work presents more topics on the third “I” of the three (3) tools of criminal investigation,
“INSTRUMENTATION” or “CRIMINALISTICS”- a branch of forensic science on the characterization of physical
evidence. Nonetheless the other two (2) “I’s” (Information and Interview/Interrogation) are presented/discussed in a
simplified manner. It aims to elucidate how this principle proves its worth on the second mode of establishing proof of
conviction or exoneration from an accusation through – CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE.
         This piece of work is intended to guide the investigators, students and co-law enforcers but does not claim
completeness and as an absolute reference, it suggests the use of other related references.
    II.      Criminal Investigation defined – an art or process, in the identification, location and scientific
             collection of evidence for court presentation to establish conviction or exoneration.
             - is the process of discovering, collecting, preparing, identifying and presenting evidence to prove the
             truth or falsity of an issue in law. – Because no two crimes are identical, even if they are committed by
             the same person, each investigation is unique.
    Why?
             1. Intuition – feeling of truth, unearthed is nothing but the truth of facts
             2. Felicity of Inspiration – the breadth of interest common to all, perseverance to do his tasks with
                consideration to humanity.
             3. Chance – an occasion unknowingly to happen, opportunity at the moment
Exceptions:
Crime defined.
             An act or omission in violation of a public law forbidding or commanding it; an offense against the
               state.
 Motives – not an element of the crime but is important to infer identity of the accused.
Example of Motives:
Investigation – means to follow – up step-by-step by patient inquiry or observation; to examine and inquire into with
care and accuracy; to find out by careful inquisition.
         a. Intellectual Characteristics – apply technical knowledge, remain – open-minded and objective and use
         logic. Knowledge of the elements of crimes, investigative techniques and willingness to work with other
         people.
Custodial Investigation – It is the skillful questioning of a suspect or a hostile witness to divulge information
concerning the crime under investigation.
         It is the function or duty of the Criminal Investigator to “make or unmake” the criminal case. His
experience, skill, training, knowledge of the law and devotion to the work are his armor and shield to the tiresome
type of work.
He is designed to establish proof of the corpus delicti, designed from the two (2) factors of:
         b. Circumstantial Evidence requires that it must consists two or more relevant facts or circumstances that
when all are link together an inference of the identity of the accused can be inferred.
         1) Motive
         2) Tracing and/or associative evidence, e.g. Latent prints, foot prints, mud, stolen properties recovered in
the control and possession of the suspect, transferred paint to the clothing of the suspect, etc.
         3) Testimonies of witnesses
           b. Initial Response
                      1) Preparation/Planning – coordination, equipment, contact attached personnel
                      2) Weather condition, transportation
                      3) Security of the crime scene
III. The Crime Scene – the whereabouts of the Elusive Physical Evidence
> Role of Reason: - a tests to the ability & decision making of the investigator
                             (1) Inductive Reasoning – the assumption may arose from specific situation/condition to
                    general situation.
                              (2) Deductive Reasoning – the assumption may arose from general situation to specific
                    situation.
> General Knowledge and Interests – The efficiency of an investigator is commensurate with his general
knowledge. To acquire this breadth of knowledge, the investigator must develop, not necessarily a highly intellectual
capacity, BUT a keen sense of observation of persons and things because “only people commit crimes, but they
invariably do so through the medium of things.” – Atty. Diosdado Lapina.
        2) Physical Reconstruction – the reconstruction of the crime scene is through the direction of an
eyewitness. e.g. ocular inspection and re-enactment.
c. Documentation Processes:
         (a). Advantage – they can be taken immediately, accurately represent the crime scene and evidence, create
    interest and increase attention to testimony.
         (b) Disadvantage – they are not selective, do not show actual distances, may be distorted and may be
    damaged by mechanical errors in shooting or processing
           © Progression -
               (1) Clockwise progression;
               (2) From large objects to small objects
                                                                                                                     5
             (3) Long-range or general view; medium or overview; and close-range or close up.
        (d) Microphotography, laser beam photography, Ultra-violet photography
        (e) Admissibility of Photographs – material, relevant, competent photographs
Kinds of Sketch:
        a. Rough Sketch – the sketch prepared by the investigator at the crime scene. Known to be the original
sketch because it shall be the source of the finished sketch.
         b. Final Sketch – or known as the office or final sketch because it is prepared at the office purposely for
court presentation. It may be prepared with the aid of a draftsman provided it shall be under the close supervision
and direction of the peace officer who initially prepared the rough sketch.
                 (a)   Title – identity of victim, place, time, date of incident, investigator and witnesses
                 (b)   Time of Arrival & weather condition
                 (c)   Compass Direction – for orientation
                 (d)   Essential Items/Specific Details – relevant/corpus delicti
                 (e)   Measurements – standard equipment
                 (f)   Legend – explanation of symbols to identify objects
                 (g)   Scale of Proportion
                 (h)   Signature of Sketcher and witness(es)
 Surveying methods
                 a) Rectangular Coordinates
                 b) Polaris Coordinates
                 c) Triangulation Method
                 d) Transecting Base lines
                 e) Compass Coordinates
                 1) Relevant facts
                 2) Requisites of Notes
                 3) Significance or importance
                 4) Report Writing
                           (a) Spot Reports
                           (b) Initial investigations
                           © Progress Reports
                           (d) Final Investigation Report
         3. Notes Taking and Reports – investigative notes are permanent written record of the facts of a case to
    be used in further investigation, in writing reports and in prosecuting the case. Record all information that helps
    to answer the questions: Who? What? Where? When? How? And Why?
              Write notes – briefly but complete, legibly, accurately, specifically, factual, clear and abbreviated
               notes that are understandable to others.
              Original notes are legally advisable in court, and officers may use them to refresh their memories.
               Officers should take to court only those notes that pertain to the particular case.
 Types of Reports:
Arrest – the taking of a person into custody in the manner authorized by law for the purpose of presenting that
person before the court to answer for the commission of a crime.
Nightcap Provision – As a general Arrest Warrants shall be enforce during day time, however, when the court
endorses the warrant with a written statement that the arrest may be made at night, this is commonly referred to as
nightcap provision.
Reasonable Force – is the amount of force a prudent person would use in similar circumstances.
b. Off-duty Arrest
Field Identification -     is on the scene identification of a suspect by the victim of or witnesses to a crime. Field
Identification must be made within minutes after the commission of the crime.
c. Developing a Suspect
1. Information provided by victims, witnesses and other persons likely to know about the crime.
         a. Mug Shots
         b. Cartography or Artist Sketch or Portrait Parle
         c. Rogues Gallery
Surveillance – is the covert, discreet observation of people and places for the purpose of obtaining information
concerning the identities or activities of subjects.
 Log – chronological records of activities that took place in the establishment under surveillance.
Subject – is who or what is observed. It can be a person, place, property, vehicle, group of people, organization or
object.
                                                                                                                       7
Methods of Surveillance:
1. Stationary Surveillance – also referred to as Fixed and Stakeout Surveillance – is used when you know or
suspect that a person is at or will come to a known location when you suspect that stolen goods are to be dropped or
when informants have told you that a crime is going to be committed.
Forms :
3. Convoy – a guard employed by the subject who stays at a reasonable distance to watch or safeguard his back
against an enemy.
5. Undercover Assignments or Roping – form of investigation in which the investigator assumes a different and
unofficial identity in order to obtain information.
Selling Crimes – are illegal activities such as drugs, alcohol, pornographic literature, stolen goods, frauds,
contraband, or black market operations.
6. Entrapment – is the conception and planning of an offense by an officer, and his procurement of its commission
by one who would not have perpetrated it except for the trickery, persuasion or fraud of the officer. The criminal
conduct was a mere “product of the creative activity,” of the officer.
e.        R a i d s - is a planned, organized operation based on the element of surprise. The objectives of a raid are
to recover stolen property, seize evidence or arrest a suspect. A raid must be the result of a hot pursuit or under the
authority of a no-knock arrest or search warrant.
                       a) Initial contact
                       (1) Investigator identifies himself
                       (2) Inform subject is under arrest
                       (3) Aware/alert subject maybe dangerous
                       b) Investigator’s/operative’s conduct
                       (1) Be natural and pleasant but forceful and aggressive
                       (2) Dominate the situation
                       (3) Voice must command authority
                       (4) Demand prompt and absolute obedience
                       (5) Avoid profane language
                       d) Without Warrant
                       (1)Arresting officer shall inform the person to be arrested his authority and cause of arrest
                                                                                                                   8
                       (2) Except under those instances so mentioned by law, where necessary action or force shall
                       be employed.
B. Search – is an examination of an individual’s person, house, papers or effects, or other buildings and premises to
discover contraband or some evidence of guilt to be used in the prosecution of a criminal action.
    1. Search Warrant – is an order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a
       Judge and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to search for personal property described therein
       and to bring it before the court.
8. Types of Searches
    1. Objectives:
       a) Effect an apprehension
       b) Obtain evidence of illegal activity by surprising the offenders in flagrante delicto
       c) Recover stolen property
RATIONALE:
          The crime scene provides the intelligent and careful investigator leads of any type of offenses committed
and therefore it should be protected and secured from any disturbances; this however, shall not preclude victims from
being retrieve for immediate medical attention. In these instances, careful procedures must be observed and
disturbances in the retrieval operation cannot be discarded or avoided but it should be limited to the instance or
situation as required.
       Securing the crime scene is a major responsibility of the first officer to arrive. Everything of a non-
emergency nature is delayed until the scene is protected.
        Any police officer who first arrives at the crime scene shall endeavor to protect
and secure the same as follows:
         a.           Cordon off the crime scene with whatever available materials like ropes, straws, human
                      barricade, police line if available, etc.
         b.           Evacuate injured persons to the nearest hospital or clinic;
         c.           Prepare to take the dying declaration of severely injured person, if any;
         d.           Explain to people gathered around the significance of protecting the crime scene and possibly
                      securing the physical evidences;
         e.           Prevent entry/exit of persons within the cordoned area; and
         f.           Prepare to brief the investigators of the situation upon their arrival.
Question: Can the first responder photograph the crime scene and possibly vulnerable pieces of evidence?
                                                                                                                      10
Answer: He can, provided his main responsibility of protecting and securing the crime scene is insured.
         1. Three (3) Scientific Divisions – subjects require the study of science and mathematics before
            practical training in the laboratory, namely:
         a. Chemistry
         b. Physics or Physical Identification
         c. Biological Science or Medico-legal
         a.   Questioned Document
         b.   Firearms Identification
         c.   Latent or Fingerprint Examination
         d.   Forensic Photography
         e.   Lie Detection or Polygraph
CHEMISTRY DIVISION
         The tasks include alcohol analysis, toxicology, narcotics testing, firearms discharge residues (GPR), paraffin
cast, identification of paint chips, chemical development of latent prints, and all types of analysis that use electronic
instruments.
3)         Toxicology – is the study of poisons and their action on the living organism. It is a very complex science
that is divided into two (2) areas:
          Trace analysis involves the examination, identification and evaluation of numerous types of physical
evidence collected in criminal investigations. The studies conducted by this unit would include the microscopic
examination of slides taken from rape victims during the pelvic examination conducted by a physician. The
microscopic examination and comparison of fibers, hair, tool marks, pry marks and wood chips are other examples of
the studies conducted in this unit. The shoe and tire prints and imprints obtained at crime scenes by investigators or
criminalists, as well as soil samples, debris, paint, glass and plastic fragments collected during the investigation.
a. Serology – Conducts all ABO typing of blood, semen and other body fluids.
         1) Presumptive Test (Benzidine TMB Reagent) – It does not establish the presence of blood; it is used as
a screening test to determine if a stain may be blood; if not eliminate suspicion of the stain.
         2) Confirmatory test (Hemin) – This is used to determine the presence of hemoglobin in a suspected blood
stain.
        4) Blood grouping – Blood grouping test will establish which of the four major groups a stain belongs in (i.e.,
O, A, B, or AB). Blood groupings involve the agglutination, or clumping, of erythrocytes (red blood cells).
          Preliminary Test (Florence) – This test is used to determine the presence of choline. Seminal plasma is
           one of the richest sources of choline. A strong positive reaction indicates the stain may contain semen,
           though this is not a specific test as a positive reaction may also be produced by tissue extracts.
c) Toxicological Analysis – of human body fluids and organs, including pathological studies of tissue to aid in
determining the cause of death, is normally a responsibility of the coroner or medical examiner.
Functions:
                  a. Conduct comparison and examination of forged, altered or questioned documents
                  b. Examines and compares handwriting exemplars (samples) with handwriting on questioned
                     documents
                  c. Exemplars made on typewriters and check protectors for comparison with questioned
                     documents
                  d. Restores or deciphers altered, obliterated or erased writing
                  e. Physical matching of cut or torn paper of various types
                  f. Examine and compare forged documents such as:
        This Division conducts firearms identification examinations, comparisons of firearms and bullets, studies to
determine trigger pull, operation of safety devices, alteration or modification of weapons or any condition of the
weapon that might cause accidental fire or make it unsafe.
Functions
                         1) Searches for, develops, photographs, and lifts latent prints at the scene of investigation
                         2) Compares suspect’s prints with latent prints obtained from crime scenes
                         3) Takes plaster casts of footprints, tire tracks, etc.
                         4) Conducts fingerprint examination of various items of evidence (e.g. guns and other
                            weapons, papers, glass, metal, etc.)
                         5) A service available to investigators is a computer terminal that records fingerprints
                            electronically, without ink or smudges.
          Through the use of Forensic Photography, many items of physical evidence, that are the prime incriminating
factors in cases, are graphically depicted.
Services Performed
POLYGRAPH DIVISION
          Instrumental in the detection of deception. There is no instrument that detects lies. The instrument
commonly called a lie detector is actually a scientific diagnostic instrument (similar to the electrocardiography) and is
referred to in many police circles as the polygraph.
          Pieces of physical evidence are always present in a crime and this can be proven by the “rolling of sleeves”
attitude of an investigator. Physical evidence recovered in the crime scene is critical in the prosecution of the case in
court. With the advent of new technologies or science, the probative value of physical evidence or “corpus delicti” of a
crime, analyzed scientifically has gained their admissibility before our courts.
          Thus, the Scene of Crime Operation was conceived to possibly address these problems. The idea of
enhancing scene of crime operation was conceived in the last quarter of 1995 by the PNP Crime Laboratory to
address these deficiencies and to assist police investigators in terms of scientific approaches in investigating criminal
cases, especially heinous crimes. The PNP Crime Laboratory has acquired new and modern equipment to boost its
capabilities in scientific investigation
A. OBJECTIVES OF SOCO
          Not all crime incidents are for Scene of Crime Operation. The necessity of the technical expertise applies
only to heinous crimes where careful scrutiny is necessary more so when the investigator is faced with a blank wall.
The field investigators through the statement of witnesses and related collected pieces of physical evidence can
handle light offenses. This now shows the importance of SOCO why it is involved only on heinous crimes. These
crimes are:
a. Murder
b. Homicide
c. Robbery with force upon things
d. Rape with Homicide
e. Arson
f. Other heinous and/or sensational cases as required and directed by higher Headquarters.
                                                                                                                     13
        Each SOCO Team shall be composed of, but not limited to the following, depending on the nature of the
case:
        1.   Team Leader
        2.   Assistant Team Leader
        3.   Photographer and photographic Log Recorder
        4.   Sketcher/Measurer
        5.   Evidence Recorder/Custodian
        6.   Evidence Recovery Personnel
        7.   Driver/Security
         The graphic design in the form of a question mark did not originate from a sudden blaze of ingenuity, but
    emerged from a long and patient mental gymnastics on how to transform the idea, that can guide the investigator
    in the marketplace of reality.
        At the crime scene, the investigator stands majestically, which gives rise to extravagant expectation by the
    aggrieved party that justice will prevail. However, when he fails to solve the case, it could cause disenchantment
    not only to the victim but to the organization as a whole. Like any mortal, the investigator is not infallible. As a
    man of flesh, he is susceptible to succumb to mental exhaustion and physical fatigue.
        Thus, the salient feature of the investigation is overlooked and the real issue becomes obscured and
    sometimes wantonly sullied. Hence, the investigator must be reminded that his role begins from the gestation
    stage of investigation and only ends either in the conviction of the accused or absolution of the innocent.
PROCEDURES:
    1. Arrival at the Crime Scene. - Establish preparation, complete equipment apparatus, companions, how
       were you able to arrive at crime scene, how fast and the time, date and weather condition upon arrival at
       scene of crime. Purpose: Enlighten the court the difference between table investigation and actual crime
       scene investigation. What is its significance in court litigation.
    2. Evaluation of the Crime Scene. - Your assessment of the crime scene, was there destruction, is the crime
       scene in its original state? Was the condition recorded? Were there any technical personalities involved?
    3. Protection of the Crime Scene. - Cordoning the are, who were the persons allowed, how were the
       evidences protected and preserved? How was the crime scene released?
    5. Photographing the Crime Scene. - What were photographed? Who took them? Know the parts and other
       related information about camera. Significant legal requirements of photographs.
7. Searching. - Method used in the search. Equipment used and how was the procedure observed.
        Locard Principle, “Whenever two things touch each other, there is always a transfer of material from one to
        the other. Any contact between the criminal and the victim or the crime scene will leave trace evidence on
        both”.
        Jones Principle, “A number of individual similarities that are each of low evidentiary value, yet which all
        point to the same conclusion, can be just as important evidence as a fingerprint.”
    8. Collection of Evidence.- Basic tools used. How was the crime scene processed? (Photograph, Sketch,
       measured in relation to points of reference). Was there adequate evidence samples?
    9. Preservation of Evidence.- Each piece of evidence in a separate container with markings and properly
       sealed or covered
    10. Verbal Interrogation. - Questioning of witness/es, person around (include policeman) and suspect/s.
        Observed the legal requirements and if possible segregating witnesses.
    11. Written Interrogation. - Constitutional Rights, basic format of affidavits or statements, witnesses and
        environment of investigation room.
    12. Technical analysis.- All pieces of evidence transmitted to proper agencies/units, “chain of custody of
        evidence”, and the results furnished to the investigating agency.
                                                                                                                  14
13. Inter-agency linkages. - Coordination and contact with other agencies. “Need to know policy.”
17. Court Trial. - Subpoena was received. Properly groomed and in uniform. Preparedness to testify in court.
To investigators, only the learned with facts and figures can survive the battle of nerve in judicial activism.
THE M-FACTOR
    ACCORDING TO VOLLMER, “The police should possess the wisdom of Solomon, the kindness of
    Job; the leadership of Moses, the strategy of Alexander, the great faith of David, the diplomacy of
    Lincoln and the reliance of the carpenter of Nazareth. “But this is an “Utopian” dream; an impossible
    dream, but an obtainable obsession, if an investigator possesses these attributes, then there will be no
    perfect crime.
             The M-Factor is a metaphysical characteristic. It can be developed and internalized through years
    of enculturation. In effect, it affixes an indelible mark of quality to the investigator; manifested when he can
    managed time and resources, personal deportment, facility of language and novel approach in solving
    crimes.
These vital nutrients of M-Factor indispensable to the moral nourishment of the investigator are:
         a. MANAGERSHIP.- managerial skill, able to demonstrate manager ship of risks to stand what is
            right. As the wisest among the philosophers said, “ Only the dead have seen the end war”.
         b. ABILITY.- It is the sum of total of skills and exceptional degree of competence in the investigative
            domain.
         c. CHARISMA.- it is a special magnetic personality and charm; on obsession of many but the natural
            gift of a few. Charisma implies simplicity of words, action and deportment of the investigators,
            which have natural attraction for people.
         d. ADAPTABILITY.- Rare traits that brings one’s act, behavior or mental state in harmony with his
            environment. A conveniently ableness to adjust to all seasons and reasons of man. Thus, the
            adaptable investigator never finds himself” a square peg in a round hole”.
         e. SINCERITY.- An abstract value and attribute marked with genuineness of spirit, strict adherence to
            promise and supreme honesty in the true calling of the police profession. It denotes sensitivity to
            the needy and sufferings of crime victims.
         f.   INTEGRITY.- In any position of respectability where trust and fidelity are sine qua non, integrity
              stands at the apex of the hierarchical pyramid of values. For integrity cannot be earned overnight. It
              is the fruit reaped through years of dedicated zeal and forbearance. As articulated by a learned
              justice, in the case entitled Gatchitorena vs Almeda, “Public office gains continuing prestige as
              long as the men occupying the position are courageous, upright and immune to doubt, suspicion
              and corruption.”
         g. ACCURACY.- Many investigation reports which lack theoretical clarity are usually drowned in
            cosmetic verbiage and ended in colossal blunder during litigation.
         i.   OPTIMISM- it is the unseen thread of moral fabric that clothes the investigator with vigor when the
              solution of the crimes is seemingly bleak and blank. Confronted with these discouraging set of
              facts, optimism now becomes the only key that can savor the savvy of the beleaguered investigator
              to hope against hope. It is this intrinsic quality of M-Factor that inspires his confidence and
              emboldens his spirit to prove the dictum. “There is no perfect crime”.
CONCLUSION:
              Today, by reason of contrived climate of prejudice, the investigator has seemingly sunk into the
         depths of decadence through sheer arrogance, brutality, corruptibility and incompetence. No amount of
         cosmetic surgery can hide this ugly truth. If unabated, these will further effect the distancing of the
         police and the masses.
                                                                                                                     15
                  Amidst such apparent public alienation, can the investigator rise against this societal conflict and
             panacea? This is now the challenge addressed to the police administrators- to produce a new breed of
             investigator, the genesis of a total investigator. The world of investigation is not for the weak of mind,
             but for the stout of heart. The M-Factor, therefore, is an abstract badge of honor of the investigator
             that should be worn proudly.
             It is difficult to educate investigators with perceived basis between what the preachers preach
             and how to depart from the cocoon of status quo. This only lay credence to the century-old
             adage that “wolf only change its furs, but not his habits.”
                  When value clash, it is only the lazy mince who finds it easy to take sides and to untie the knot with
             ease, but not the visionary nor the learned. This is the thrust of this writing, to cross the information
             highway of Criminalistics and to jog along its global avenue and not just stroll its barriotic lane. Without
             this vision, we shall woke-up one morning, to find the streets littered with trails of blood and marble of
             crosses.
                 Said it all by common experience and observation, the ten most notorious inadvertence of
             investigators that refuses to submerge from the ocean floors of errors, are:
             1. That Criminalistics is only for the Criminalists and not to the investigator.
                Today, Criminalistics is now a towering monument in the landscape of investigation. It becomes the
                cornerstone and citadel of investigator as treasure house of science for bridging crimes to criminals
                thousand miles apart.
             2. That in the absence of witness solution is nil. Finding no evidence or witness should not be
                viewed as hopeless, but as a challenge. For there is no perfect crime only imperfect investigators.
             3. That there is no crime in the absence of corpus delicti. Is this correct? This conclusion is an
                indicia that one is suffering from legal vacuity. It is a sin to prejudice without basis in fact and in
                law. Literally, corpus delicti means the body of the crime but that is not all, pieces of physical
                evidence are included.
             4. That length of service is not a guarantee for excellence. A tree does not make a forest, nor
                swallow a summer, neither a man is an island. This egocentric syndrome is detestable for it is
                tantamount to a sin of mental dishonesty. “Seniority could mean senility.” How many cases were
                dismissed due to scientific malnutrition on criminalistics is too deafening to be ignored.
             5. That grandstanding and showmanship be tabooed.- It is the fundamental rule, that all gathered
                evidence should be handled with care, to protect its evidentiary value against erosion form
                elements from the time of retrieval to the laboratory.
             8. That suspect’s premature arrest frown-upon with disfavor.- The temptation to name names
                due to public pressure at the expense of the innocent is unpardonable sin.
             10. That only truth and not truth decay- Truth is non-negotiable statement, for it is a sin to lie. But
                 how many investigators fall-prey to the onerous pressure from the sit of power and blinded by the
                 sparkle of worldly wealth and were forced to weave the unpardonable lie, is reeking with
                 extravagant truth, but difficult to reverse..
RATIONALE:
         Luminaries in the field of criminal investigation have always advocated the principle that a crime scene will
always give leads to the identity of the perpetrator of a crime; pieces of evidence found at the crime scene will link or
tie perpetrators to the crime. It is evident therefore, that approaches in crime scene search methods and investigative
procedures in its management must be carefully observed and practiced. Testimonies can hardly stand alone in the
absence of corroborating evidence such as object or real evidences.
CONCEPT:
                                                                                                                      16
          The processing of a crime scene requires careful analysis, collection, handling, and preservation of pieces
of evidence. The availability of the different strategies in processing a crime scene calls for case to case basis
principle, hence, proper management techniques in order not to defeat the very purpose of investigation must be
done.
Search – is an examination of a person’s house or other buildings or premises or of the person for the purpose of
discovering contraband or illicit or stolen property or some evidence of guilt to be used in prosecuting a criminal
action with which a person is charged.
        (a) A search warrant has been issued – specify place and things to be searched. General and Scatted
Search Warrants are inadmissible.
> Plain Feel/Touch Evidence or “Pat-down Searches” – the plain feel exception is a legitimate extension of the
plain view doctrine.
        a. Exclusionary Rule – established that courts may not accept evidence that was obtained by
unreasonable search and seizure, regardless of its relevance to the case.
           b. Fruits of a Poisonous Tree Doctrine – established that evidence obtained as a result of an earlier
illegality must be excluded from trial.
          c. Good Faith Doctrine – established that illegally obtained evidence may be admissible if the police were
truly not aware that they were violating the suspect’s constitutional rights.
Note: After search – detailed inventory receipts, copy of which shall be furnished to the owner.
           d. Crime Scene Search – a successful crime-scene search locates, identifies and preserves all evidence
present.
           a. Establish that a crime was committed and what the specific crime was;
           b. Establish when the crime was committed
           c. Identify who committed the crime
           d. Explain how the crime was committed
           e. Suggest why the crime was committed
4. Organizing the Crime-Scene Search = Organizing a search includes dividing the duties, selecting a search
pattern, assigning personnel and equipment and giving instructions.
        a. Selection of a Search Method: To insure a thorough and complete inspection for possible evidence. A
systematic method of searching the area surrounding the crime scene must be employed. The particular method
employed will be dictated by the following factors:
         1) Locale: - The location of the scene will influence the method of search to be used.
         (a) Building Searches – always think of safeties. The greatest concern will be adequately sorting evidence
from non-evidence.
         (b) Outdoor Areas: - Weather and deteriorating light may necessitate a more rapid search when crime
scene is outdoors. Outdoor areas maybe difficult to mark off, since there are often few natural boundaries. Trace
evidence (e.g. dust, hair, fibers) is exceedingly difficult to retrieve due to obstructions from vegetation or the wind.
         (c) Vehicle Searches – Upholstery and carpet materials provide a fruitful source of trace evidence in
vehicle searches. First search the area around the vehicle and the exterior. Finally, search the interior along one side
from front to back, and then return along the other side to the front.
          2) Number of personnel available – the more persons available to process a crime scene, the more
rapidly the search can be conducted.
                                                                                                                    17
          3) Types of Objects Sought – The type and size of the objects sought at a scene affect the form of search.
Larger objects are more rapidly observed and require less time and personnel unlike in minute objects like fibers,
prints, etc.
        4) Speed Desired – Appropriate time is required considering the nature and kind of evidence that will be
recognized and collected.
         b. Search Patterns or methods – it shall be dependent on personnel available, time limits imposed by
weather, lighting conditions, terrain and other circumstances to consider.
         1) Strip Method – It consists of processing the area by walking back and forth, viewing an approximately
three to four-strip with each pass. As one strip is completed, the investigator moves to the next parallel strip. If
several searchers are used, they walk side by side in processing the crime scene.
         Disadvantages:
         a. The method may be difficult to utilize over rugged terrain, or where the crime scene is ill-defined;
         b. The method is potentially inefficient, because that fact that most scene have a major point of impact (e.g.
the body in a homicide case) around which the bulk of the evidence is likely to e found.
        2) Grid Search Method – It consists of two strip searches conducted over the same area at right angles to
one another.
       Advantage: Grid search in the area place a premium on thoroughness, since each spot in the area is
examined twice.
         Disadvantages:
         a. The search takes twice as long as a strip search; and
         b. Objects found on the second pass may actually have been left by the searchers on the first pass.
        3) Spiral Search Method – A clockwise circle is begun at the major impact point of the scene and the
searcher circles that point at an ever increasing radius.
         Advantages:
         a. The impact point of the scene is the focal point of investigation; and
         b. The boundaries of the relevant search are more easily defined, since the investigator will eventually reach
a point when no more evidence is being discovered.
         Disadvantages:
         a. In order to reach the point of impact, the investigator must track across (and eventually contaminate) a
portion of the crime scene;
         b. The point of impact is not always at the geographic center of the crime scene; and
         c. The spiral method cannot easily be used with multiple searchers.
        4) Zone or Quadrant Method - The area to be searched is divided into unit zones and each unit is then
processed individually as a separate crime scene
         Advantages:
         a. A zone search aids in organizing a large or complex crime scene;
         b. Numerous personnel can be used without getting in each other’s way.
         Disadvantages:
         a. A zone search can be used only when the crime scene permits a sub-dividing; and
         b. If used too often, supervision and coordination of the units may be difficult.
                                                                                                                        18
          5) Wheel (Inward or Outward) Search – It is the least effective, particularly in a large area. The tendency
is to concentrate on the center and hence, to miss the evidence to the outside.
* Techniques in searching:
5. Physical Evidence – objects or materials searched, identified and collected at the crime scene significant and
relevant to a particular incident or event. It is anything real or material – it has substance – that helps to establish the
facts of the case. They are referred to as:
    a. Trace Evidence. Direct evidence establishes proof of a fact without any other evidence.
    b. Evidence established by law is called Prima-facie Evidence.
    c. Evidence that merely tends to incriminate a person, such as a suspect’s footprints found near the crime
scene, is called Circumstantial Evidence.
    d. Exculpatory Evidence – these are pieces of physical evidence that would clear one of blame, for example,
    having a blood type different from that of blood found at a murder scene.
    1. Corpus Delicti Evidence – establishes that a crime has in fact been committed.
    2. Associative Evidence – those that links a suspect with the crime.
    Processing Physical Evidence includes discovering, recognizing and examining it; collecting, recording and
    identifying it; packaging, conveying and storing it; exhibiting it in court; and disposing of it when the case is
    closed.
         Physical Evidence must be material, relevant, and competent. To determine what is evidence, consider first
    the type of crime that appears to have been committed. Then looks for any objects that are unrelated or foreign
    to the scene, that are unusual in location or number, that have been damaged or broken or whose relation to
    other objects suggests a pattern that fits the crime.
    Standard of Comparison – is an object, measure or model with which evidence is compared to determine
    whether both came from the same source.
Packaging:
              1.   Plastic Bags – does not “breathe”, best because may cause condensation to form.
              2.   Brown-paper bags or envelope – used especially for clothing.
              3.   Boxes – for large and heavy objects.
              4.   To preserve immovable items at the scene, use photographs, modeling clay, moulage, silicon and
                   other impression-making materials.
7. Transporting Evidence – Personal delivery, registered mail, insured parcel post, air express, are the legal ways
to transport evidence. Always specify that the person receiving the evidence is to sign for it. How evidence should be
transported depends on its size and type and the distance involved. Use the fastest method available. If the package
is mailed, a “return receipt” should be requested.
         Frequently examined physical evidence includes fingerprints, voiceprints, shoe and tire impressions, bite
marks, tools and tool marks, weapons and ammunition, glass, soils and minerals, body fluids (including blood), hairs
and fibers, safe insulation, rope and tape, drugs, documents and laundry and dry-cleaning marks.
What to be examined?
    1. Class Characteristics – these are the features that place an item into a specific category; e.g., size and
       shape of a tool mark may indicate that the tool used was a screwdriver rather than a pry bar.
    2. Individual Characteristics – the features that distinguish one item from another of the same type; e.g.,
       chips and wear patterns in the blade of a screwdriver may have marks that are distinguishable from those of
       any other screwdriver.
8. What is AFIS? It means automated fingerprint identification system – an electronic fingerprinting system that can
digitize fingerprint information to produce inkless fingerprints. The latent fingerprints are scanned and converted into
an electronic image that is stored in a data base for rapid retrieval.
a. Voiceprints – is a graphic record of an individual’s voice characteristics made by a sound spectrograph which
records the energy patterns emitted by speech.
b. Bite Marks – Teeth impressions are found in partially eaten food, they can be cast in the same way shoe and tire-
thread impressions are. Dental impression material is preferred because of its fine texture. Saliva samples should be
taken using a swab before bite marks are cast.
c. Toneline – is a black photographic outline of the perimeter of a bite mark that can be compared directly with
models of an individual’s teeth.
d. Tools and Tool marks – Identify each suspect tool with a string tag. Wrap it separately and pack it in a strong box
for sending to the laboratory. A tool mark – is an impression left by a tool on a surface. It provides leads as to the
size and type of tool that made it. A tool mark is compared with a standard of comparison impression rather than with
the tool itself.
Photograph weapons and then identify them with a string tag. Unload guns. Record the serial number on the string
tag and in your notes. Label the packing container “Firearms.” Identify bullets on the base, cartridges on the outside
of the case near the bullet end and cartridge cases on the inside near the open end. Put ammunition in cotton or soft
paper and ship to the laboratory. Never send live ammunition through the mail; use a common carrier.
f. Glass
         Label glass fragments using adhesive tape on each piece. Wrap each piece separately in cotton to avoid
chipping and place in a strong box marked “fragile” for sending to the laboratory.
g. Spectrographic Analysis – can determine the elements of the glass, even of extremely small fragments.
         Put one pound of comparison soil into a container, identifying it on the outside of the container. Collect
evidence soil the same way. Seal both containers to prevent loss, wrap them and send them to the laboratory. Soils
vary greatly in color, particle size, minerals and chemical constituents. Take sufficient samples directly from and
around the suspected area at perhaps 5 to 100 foot intervals, depending on the scene.
i. X-ray Diffraction – chemical analysis of soil generally examined by density to determine mineral content and by
microscope.
j. Ropes, Strings and Tapes - It can provide leads in identifying suspects and in linking suspects with the crime. Put
labeled rope, twine and string in a container. Put tapes on waxed paper or cellophane and then place them in a
container.
k. Drugs – identification kits can be used to make a preliminary analysis of a suspicious substance, but the full
analysis must be done at the laboratory. Put liquid drugs in a bottle and attach a label. Put powdered and solid drugs
in a pill or powder box and identify the same way.
l. Documents – Do not touch documents with your bare hands. Place them in a cellophane envelope and then in a
manila envelope, and identify them on the outside.
          Ultraviolet Light – used to detect invisible laundry marks. Submit the entire garment to the laboratory,
identifying it with a string tag or directly on the garment.
                                                                                                                     20
Blood can be identified as animal or human. It is most useful in eliminating suspects. Age, race or sex cannot be
determined from blood samples, but DNA analysis or DNA
o. Examining Hair – The hair shaft has a cuticle on the outside consisting of overlapping scales that always point
toward the tip; a cortex consisting of elongated cells and the medulla – the center of the hair – consisting of variably
shaped cells. Variations in these structures make comparisons and identifications possible.
p. DNA Profiling
DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid, an organic substance in the nucleus of all living cells that provides the genetic code
determining a person’s individual characteristics. DNA is a basic part of the cell’s chromosomes and can be used to
create a genetic fingerprint to identify a person. It is found in body fluids, hair and tissues.
DNA PROFILING – can be done on blood, hair, saliva, semen, indeed cells from almost any part of the body. It uses
materials from which chromosomes are made to identify individuals positively. Except for identical twins, no two
individuals have the same DNA structure.
Probative Evidence – evidence that is vital for the investigation or prosecution of a case, tending to prove or actually
proving guilt or innocence.
a. Blood
b. Semen
c. Other Types
        1) Tissues/Bones/Teeth: Although small amounts of evidence have provided enough   DNA for analysis,
the amount that will be needed is unpredictable and depends on many factors including age and concentration
sample.
Specimens should be collected and dried as soon as possible to avoid bacterial contamination.
          2) Wet Specimens – Quick-dry using a hair dryer on the cool setting. For large amounts of material, use a
large floor fan. Absorb wet specimen onto sterile gauze. 100% cotton or Q-Tips and then dry.
        3) Dry Specimens – Scrape dried specimen from permanent surfaces. Cut dried specimen out from large
areas. Package whole items if manageable.
d. Packaging Specimens
Drying specimens isn’t enough. They must be kept as free from moisture as possible.
1) Small Items – Place the collected specimen in a zip-lock bag. Squeeze the air out of the bag.
2) Larger Items – Use paper bags for large items and tape them closed.
e. Storing Collected Evidence. – Heat can destroy DNA, therefore, if the evidence is not sent for DNA Analysis
within a few days, store the packaged evidence as directed.
        1) Short – term storage (less than 30 days). - Store in freezer. If freezer is not available, refrigerate
evidence. Store at room temperature for only 1 – 2 days.
         Send evidence and exemplar samples, from the victim and suspect(s), properly labeled, together with a
written description of the specimens. Include any other important or relevant facts concerning the case and origin of
the sample(s) for the forensic scientist. Send samples via an overnight carrier. The sender is responsible for following
chain of custody.
CONCEPT:
          Presently, the judiciary together with the hierarchy of the Philippine National Police has given credence
more to the value of PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. At the outset, these inanimate objects are referred to as “SILENT
WITNESSES” because they are addressed to the senses of the court. Hence, the role of the different disciplines on
police sciences is necessary to interpret the meaning of the markings, impressions or striations embedded or marked
on these pieces of collected or gathered evidence. Result of examinations are testified, interpreted and argued
before the magistrate, who has the ultimate discretion whether or not to consider or accept the weight and probative
value of the physical or object evidence as elaborated by the testimonies of the examiners or experts.
Guided from the principles laid down by the following authors on the subject, namely:
        O’Hara and O’Hara, in his book “Fundamentals of Criminal Investigation”, he stressed that “Human Beings
are creators of Habits.” He claimed that a suspect/perpetrator though how careful he maybe, even it needs a
rehearsal before doing his criminal act, will and will unconsciously leave traces or marks at the scene.
        Dr. Paul L. Kirk said in his book, “Crime Investigation”, “The success of most investigation begins at the
crime scene.”
        Kenneth W Goddard, in his book, “Crime Scene Investigation,” also suggested that, “ There is a need to
reconstruct the scene of the crime to tie the suspect(s) to either the crime scene or the victim(s).”
         In one sensational decisions of the Supreme Court, it had considerably weighed or favored the probative
value of pieces of physical evidences offered in evidence over the testimonies of witnesses. The court empathically
favored the value of physical evidence relying on the principle, “res ipso luquitor” (the thing speaks for itself),
provided however, that it must past the test of unquestionable “Chain of Custody of Evidence.” The justifications of
these principles shall be discussed in the next topics.
GUIDELINES
          The Crime Scene - is the locale within the immediate vicinity of the occurrence wherein evidence may be
found. Its significance are:
        From the managerial and administrative viewpoints, a crime scene search is affected by two (2)
environments – INTERNAL and EXTERNAL.
         Internal – environment is best described as being all factors, which exists within an agency that can affect
the quality of scene searches. Many aspects such as funding, training of personnel, proper equipment or facilities,
command structure and planning programs directly contribute to the success or failure of searches.
                                                                                                                      22
          External – environmental factors – are those, which exist apart from a department and generally, include
societal changes and pressures. These factors may have immense impact on the operations and administrations of
the investigative work and therefore the investigators must be properly postured and careful in handling properly the
situation.
         Walk-through is done by carefully entering the crime scene and keenly detecting, observing and visualizing
    the nature, condition, appearances and positions of the crime scene.
    1.     Visualization of what the scene looked like before the crime occurred;
    2.     Visualization of what took place during the crime;
    3.     Identify all evidence potentials; prints, weapons, etc. and perishable evidence;
    4.     Identify laboratory service and other equipment needs – barricades, lights, etc.
    5.     Identify manpower needs; and
    6.     Establishing a practical path through the scene, that affords the lowest risk factor in terms of damaging or
           destroying evidence.
3. Physical Evidence – are objects or materials searched, found and collected at the crime scene that are supposed
to be competent and material to the case under investigation.
       The guiding principle that must be borne in mind is, “Nothing should be
touched or moved until it has been identified, measured, printed or photographed.”
           1) It is the decisive factor in determining guilt or innocence of a suspect. By the testimonies of an expert
witness.
        2) Can be a material aid in locating the perpetrator of a crime and because it narrows down the search of
suspects.
        3) Establish corpus delicti and scene of incident.
How?
           a) Determine the type of wound inflicted, which can prove the search for the weapon used.
           b) Interviews of persons knowledgeable or who has information about the incident.
           c) Search and collection of related pieces of physical evidence
           d) Personal observation of the surroundings and the condition, appearances of the scene.
         1) Proper Recognition – the investigator must be knowledgeable of the elements or requisites of the
crime committed in order that he/she can search and gathered appropriate or relevant evidences; may it be
associating and/or tracing evidence.
         3) Proper Collection and Identification – it is the use of systematic/chronological, legal and complete
procedures in the collection process. Thereafter, placing the items in an appropriate separate materials or containers
to secure the evidences.
         > Insufficiency of sample and failure to supply standards of comparison and controls are the most common
errors. The employment of improper collection techniques results also in a failure to realize the full probative value of
the evidence. Factors to consider includes:
         4) Proper Control, Handling and Preservation – Marking, tagging and/or labeling the pieces of collected
evidences accordingly.
         > Most organic matters change in character through natural decomposition and unless preventive measures
are taken, their probative value is destroyed. Factors such as time (weather) and temperature must be considered.
          6) Prepared Oral Testimonies – investigator/examiner must be ready to testify in court with regards to his
participation in the investigation of the case as a witness or as an examiner.
                                                                                                                       23
         1) Real/Object Evidence – tangible objects (items that speaks for themselves), addressed to the senses of
the court.
         2) Associative Evidence – evidence, which links the crime scene with the criminal/perpetrator of the crime.
These are items unconsciously left behind by the suspect such as: fingerprints, footprints, personal properties, etc.
         3) Tracing Evidence – evidence that may be found in the suspect through the transfer of these items from
crime scene to his person, such as: paints, blood, mud, dirt, etc.
         4) Oral Testimonies – interviews with persons with personal knowledge about the crime under
investigation.
         5) Documentary Evidence – written information
Purpose :
       > To ease the scene; and
       > Avoid mingling and possible destruction
                  (b) Individual Characteristics – attributable marks or features found on individual items or things.
                            (1) Microscopic Examination Details
                            (2) Striation Markings (tools and firearms)
                            (3) Individual cuts and depressions (footprints, fingerprints)
         a) Natural – this refers to weather condition, length of time or exposure to sunlight, rains, animals, etc.
         b) Accident Causes – inexperienced or untrained personnel, unintentional damages, etc.
         c) Intentional – deliberate acts to erase or disturb conditions and positions of material evidence.
Purposes:
                    a. To aid in the solution of the case
                    b. To prove an element of the offense; and
                    c. To prove the theory of the case
         a. Obtain it legally (valid search warrant, permission and consent of the owner)
         b. Described the details in your notes
         c. Identify it properly
         d. Pact it properly
         e. Maintain the “Chain of Custody of Evidence) or chrono1ogical accounting of evidence.
>. Circumstantial Evidence – facts and circumstances observed and testified to by witnesses that an inference of
the identity of the perpetrators may be established.
          6. Eyewitness Testimony – required is that the witness possesses personal knowledge, meaning, must
have actually witnessed the commission of the crime.
        8. Be able to Reconstruct Events – the purpose is to assess the crime scene and possibly to infer
    assumptions or conclusions through the appearance, nature and conditions of objects, on the theory that they
    speak for themselves.
        The inadequacy of these exhibits will give a hard time for the examiner to perform his/her tasks; utmost, the
examination will not prosper due to insufficiency of materials or exhibits.
          Search, collection & identification and eventually handling and preservation of evidence is a tedious
function, but with the breadth of interest and felicity of inspiration and investigator possess, such few qualities can
overcome this problem.
          1. Get all the Physical Evidence - Collect every item or evidence suspected or foreign though it does not
seem important at the time. Process the crime scene proceeding inwards but start collecting the marked and
identified pieces of physical evidence outwards. The closer it is to the center of the crime, the more valuable the
evidence is.
        2. Mark the Evidence Correctly – Always take photographs, then mark down on your sketch the exact
place where you found the evidence. Record in your notebook the exact details. NEVER MARK THE EVIDENCE
WITH “X”, IT IS TOO COMMON AND EASY TO IMITATE.
         In marking evidence, be careful with evidence that affects its monetary value, like jewelries, watches, or any
other type of personal properties that marking would depreciate its worth, they must not be mark instead use the
other forms of identification.
          3. Prevent Contamination - Must always use and maintain separate containers to each of the pieces of
physical evidence collected. Do not do anything on the evidences that may change or contaminate each other except
in those instances that could be explained. The use of small bottles, envelopes, folded papers, self-sealing envelopes
for small types of evidence is proper. Do not put two (2) objects that are to be compared in the same container.
         4. Maintain the PRINCIPLE OF CHAIN OF CUSTODY OF EVIDENCE – shall mean the continuous
handling of a piece of evidence from the time it was searched or collected up to the time it is offered or presented as
evidence in court. The Chain of Custody of Evidence – must be maintained unbroken from the time of the search
and collection of the evidence until it is presented in court. This chain must be kept to a minimum, ideally one person,
except in reasonable circumstances.
                                                                                                                       25
         Articles at the scene of the crime may not always be readily recognizable as evidence of the crime. The
investigator must make a preliminary evaluation or survey of the objects as they are found, to determine whether they
have evidentiary value and should be collected. The apparent absence of any piece of physical evidence at the crime
would only tend to show that perhaps the investigator failed to conduct the necessary processing and searching of
the crime scene. The following basic checklist should be used to ensure that the investigator has recognized and
examined all potential evidence at the scene.
1. What crime has occurred? Different types of crime generate different types of physical evidence.
         2. Items unusual to the scene. Articles, which would NOT normally be found at the type of scene in
question, should be collected as evidence, since it is likely that the offender either brought the object to the scene or
disturbed the object in its normal location.
         3. Items necessary to complete. Proof that a crime has in fact been committed.
         4. Weapons and other instruments of crime. Weapons or instrument used to facilitate the commission of the
crime.
         5. Associative/tracing items. What items are significant to link or trace the suspect to the crime and
eventually would identify him/her.
         6. Is there any fingerprints or tracks searched?
         7. What are the evidences to be used as standards or exemplars?
1. QUESTIONED DOCUMENTS
        Questioned Documents reveal a lot of identifiable features, which can be employed to support other
evidence, confirm that the crime occurred and link or eliminate a suspect.
a. Burned
         1) Examine with care the area of burned documents. A slight gust of wind may alter the evidence.
         2) Take photo of the burned paper residue in order to record their position       and location. In addition,
           record and photograph any visible writings on the paper.
         3) Use a cardboard sheet, a piece of glass or metal plate to pick up the burned paper. Put the evidence into
           a firm container seamed with cotton batting. Tweezers can be used to pick up small pieces.
         4) Burned paper located in trashcans or safety deposit boxes should remain in the container where located
           and the entire container submitted.
         5) Mark the evidence with your initial, the date and an exhibit number.
         6) Label any mailing materials as “FRAGILE”
         1)Always surrender the authentic evidence rather than is photograph, photocopy or any other type of
           reproduction
         2) Handle the document properly and protect the concealed fingerprints.
         3) Label the document with your initials, the date and an exhibit number in the most visible but less crucial
           pale of the document. Put it in a protective covering if it is brittle or may be exposed to rough treatment.
           Avoid putting staples or pins on the document
         4) Pack the document in an envelope or plastic covering, fasten and mark with your initials, the date and an
           exhibit number.
         5) Collect a comparison standard.
a. Imprints – usually visible. These are transfers of oils from the skin, transfer of blood, transfer of dirt. These prints
are processed by photographing or at times the use of developing powders.
b. Impressions in putty, in tar, in wet paints, in greasy surfaces or silt; usually semi-visible and invisible prints.
These prints are processed by using developing powders, chemicals or fumes.
           The investigator should be alert on the places of where latent prints could be searched. First, the place of
entrance like doorknobs, broken windows, light switches. Second, place of attack, like drinking glasses, furniture,
safes, cabinets, all plain smooth surfaces where valuables may have been touched by the suspect(s). Thirdly, place
of exit like doorknobs, side of doors until the gates.
                                                                                                                         26
         Visible imprints are the most obvious and noticeable evidence and should be collected first through
photographs. Hidden prints are revealed by dusting and are observed by looking in an “OBLIQUE” manner.
Developing latent prints must be observed the “PRINCIPLE OF CONTRAST” . Then mount or lift onto a fingerprint
card or a mounting form paper
        Extreme care must be used with the fresh fingerprints since they are easy to smear. If it can not be
developed, pack it on a box where the prints will not be touched or altered.
3.        FOOT and TIRE PRINTS & IMPRESSIONS – These are produced when material adheres to the sole and
heel of the shoe or the tread of the tire it is deposited on a hard base or surface. For example; dust, paint, blood, etc.,
adhering to a shoe or tire may leave a print on paper or a polished wooden base.
          IMPRESSIONS made by foot prints, tires, and tools can easily be destroyed during a preliminary crime
scene search. To prevent the loss of or damaging such evidence, immediately secure the crime scene and conduct
the collection and preservation of impressions forthwith in the following manner:
5.      BODY FLUIDS – Body fluids and seminal stains are important evidences. Whether it be bloodstains or
seminal fluids, they can be employed to determine if a person is associated with a crime or not. The succeeding
presentations are offered as guidelines:
a. Procedures
1. Collect articles with stained on it; cut it from the large source and mark it with your initial directly on the evidence
in a conspicuous place away from the stained area.
2. Dry the blood through natural process or at a room temperature.
3. Cut it, if the owner consented; if not scrape it with a clean knife
4. When blood samples are required, it should be taken by medical personnel with approximately 5 cc in a sterile
test tube.
1. Fresh Blood – collect it with tissue paper or with a medicine dropper and place it in a bottle with preservative. In
case NO preservative, place it in a microscope slide and allow it to dry carefully without any heat, or soak them with
pieces of blotting paper or filter paper and let them dry.
2. Do not heat stained material or place it in bright sunlight to dry. Hang clothing and similar articles in a room where
there is a rapid air movement, like an electric fan, except when foreign material has potential significance.
3. If items containing fresh moist stains are not completely dried before packaging, decomposition will occur which
will prevent complete testing.
4. When the stain is dry, label the item and roll it in paper or place it in a paper bag or box; seal and label the
container. Do not put stained objects into plastic bags.
c. Dried Stains
1. On cloth; label the article, roll in paper or place it in a bag or box, seal and label the container. Do not attempt to
remove the stain from the cloth. On small solid objects; send entire object to the laboratory, after labeling and
packaging it.
2. On large solid objects; it it is practical, the whole object should be delivered to the laboratory, with areas
containing dry stains covered with paper.
3. If the stain cannot be removed in any manner, use a piece of gauze dampened with distilled water to absorb the
stain, Make a similar swab of an unstained area. Dry the gauze pads, place them in separate envelopes, mark for
identification and seal.
d. Seminal Stains
Semen – is the male reproductive fluid. It normally contains spermatozoa, which are reproductive cells, as well as
other substances. An ultra-violet lamp may be useful in the preliminary search, because of the bluish - white
fluorescence of semen stains.
                                                                                                                     27
Procedure:
        1) Air – dry the material on a clean paper
        2) When dried, place the material inside a paper bag. Mark the bag with the investigator’s initials, the date,
and an exhibit number before fastening it. DO NOT BAG ITEMS, IF THEY ARE NOT THOROUGHLY DRIED.
        3) If the material has to be folded, cover the stained area with clean paper. Avoid folding across the
stained area.
        4) Bloodstained materials should be packaged individually.
        5) Collect a comparison standard. Get blood and saliva samples following steps, a & b.
e. Saliva
Procedure:
        1) Air – dry the material on a clean paper
        2) When dried, place the material inside a paper bag. Mark the bag with the investigator’s initials, the date,
and an exhibit number before fastening it. DO NOT BAG ITEMS, IF THEY ARE NOT THOROUGHLY DRIED.
        3) If the material has to be folded, cover the stained area with clean paper. Avoid folding across the
stained area.
        4) Saliva stained materials should be packaged individually.
        5) Collect a comparison standard. Get blood and saliva samples following steps, a & b.
f. Sweat – Obtain sweat evidence, following/observing the steps shown in paragraph “c”.
g. Urine – Obtain urine evidence, following/observing the steps shown in paragraph “c”.
         Examples are; animal (hairs, wools, silk), vegetable (cotton, flax, jute,
hemp), mineral (asbestos, glass) and other fabrics are common articles, yet contain a variety of animal, vegetable
and synthetic fibers of numerous colors; thus threads and individual fibers frequently are useful evidence in criminal
cases. Fibers and threads are often found in fabric abrasions, torn metal or in other areas on hit and run vehicles. In
burglary cases, such evidence may be located on torn screens, broken glass, or metal or safes, or other locations.
Collection procedure:
         1) Use forceps and place it on a paper. Sufficient samples from both victim and suspect must be submitted
for examination. Threads, cords, and ropes are cut into pieces as exemplars or samples.
         2) Fabrics are threads woven together crosswise.
         All these forms of physical evidence come from fibers. A number of fibers
can be twisted to form a thread. A number of threads can be twisted to form a cord. A number of cords can be twisted
to form a rope. The difference usually is that of the size and strength.
        b. Things to look for in Shoes – The shoes itself must be wrapped and
submitted for examination.
         c. Clothing, rugs, blankets and curtains – To be examined, must be taken away from the suspect as
soon as possible. Do not cut or damage the garment. If it is necessary to cut clothing, cut any place other than where
a bullet or knife has gone through. If clothing are wet or stained with blood, urine or water, let it dry at a room
temperature before packing. In collecting, be careful of any objects falling or dropping from the clothing, these things
may be of importance. Markings must be done on the plastic container separately packed. Falling or adhered
evidence must be collected separately and record its exact location or source.
                                                                                                                    28
         1) Evidence found adhering to movable evidences must be protected with cellophane or paper then
         transmitted to the Forensic Crime Laboratory
         2) For non-movable evidences/objects, scrape it and place it in a cartoon with cover
         3) Mark and label all evidences, however, see to it that there are sufficient standards included.
e. Tissue
a. Hair Strands
9. FIREARMS EVIDENCE
          Ballistics – is the science that deals with the motion and flight of projectiles. The laboratory can
           establish the range, trajectory or penetration power of fired bullet, ricochet pattern studies and the like.
          Things to consider when firearm is recovered at the crime scene:
b. Gunshot Residue
        5) Make a control swab by wetting a cotton swab with dilute acid. Then put the swab inside a plastic bag
           marked as “Control Swab”.
        6) Get swab off the interior of a spent casing using water, instead of acid. Put the swab in a plastic bag
           and mark as “Casing”.
        7) Put clothing evidence intended for gunshot residue testing inside a plastic bag. Mark the bag with your
           initials, the date and exhibit number.
        8) Send the firearm to the laboratory to determine the distance from the bullet hole to the fire arm muzzle.
           If the ammunition is available, send with the weapon.
        c. Loaded Weapon – revolvers – make a diagram on the rear face of the cylinder to show the position of
each cartridge with respect to the firing pin. The cartridges should be numbered to correspond to the numbering of
the chambers.
d. Small Firearm
e. Serial Numbers
        1)    If the serial number has been erased, put an identifying mark on the weapon.
        2)    Attach an identification tag to the weapon containing your initials, the date, and an exhibit number.
        3)    Put the weapon in a paper or plastic bag.
        4)    Do not attempt to retrieve the serial number using acid-tech solutions.
f. Shoulder Weapons
         6) Transmit the information to the laboratory. Scratch initials, or mark an identifying mark near the mouth
             of the shell, preferably inside the mouth.
         7) Do not scratch or mutilate head or near portion of cartridge case.
         8) Roll individually in paper.
         9) Place rubber band around paper.
         10) Place wrapped cartridges in a heavy paper envelope.
         11) Forward to the laboratory. Mark the bag with your initials, the date, and an exhibit number.
         i. Fired Paper/Shotgun shells may be marked either on the inside or the outside of the paper or plastic
portion of the shell. Brass Shells should be treated as cartridge case.
         1) Photograph the fire paper shot shells before conducting an
              examination.
         2) Do not mar, mutilate, scratch, or nick head the shell.
         2. Note as to markings of identification used.
         3. Sketch showing relative position of shells when recovered on the floor or street.
         4. Transmit the information to the laboratory.
         5. With ink or indelible pencil, mark inside of shells using initials of persons recovering.
         6. Do not scratch, nick, mar or mutilate brass head of shell.
         7. Roll individually in a paper.
         8. Place wrapped cartridges in heavy paper envelope.
         9. Forward to the laboratory.
         10. Mark the bag with your initials, the date and an exhibit number.
j. Shotgun Wads – the wad should be placed in a pill box, sealed and labeled.
       k. Small Shot – buckshot, birds shot and similar ammunitions are too small to be marked; hence, the
specimen should be placed in a pillbox, sealed and labeled.
l. Ammunition as Evidence
         1) Always attempt to recover unused ammunition for comparison purposes when firearms are obtained as
         evidence.
         2) Unfired ammunitions may be marked on the side of the cartridge case, near the bullet end.
         3) Ammunition may be compared to establish similarities in type and manufacturer.
         4) In some instances it is possible to prove that hand loaded bullets had a common source or that the
         cartridges were reloaded with the same tools.
          Extreme care is needed when searching for bomb or arson – related evidence. For instance, the presence
of large volume of debris, their small size and possibility of their being washed away when fire is extinguished, make
this type of evidence hard to find. The succeeding paragraphs would show how arson and explosive debris are
gathered and preserved.
1. Arson Debris
         a. Glass
                                                                                                                    31
                 1) Collect glass splinters and dust them for fingerprints, to determine if it indicates that a Molotov
                 Cocktail device was used.
                 2) Package the glass splinters in a clean, fastenable metal can.
Mark the metal can with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent information.
                 1) Collect materials, which may appear to have traces of gasoline or any other incendiary. Follow
                    the steps shown above for glass.
                 2) Obtain comparison standards. Materials similar to the collected evidence which appear to be
                    free from gasoline or any other incendiary, should be collected as standard. Though not
                    always necessary, comparison standards are required especially if the floor or ground work is
                    chemically similar to the incendiary used.
d. Foreign Objects
2. Explosive Debris
        a.   Find the focus of the blast and then get loose debris from it. Subsequently, remove additional material
             up to 3-5 inches deep.
        b.   Put the evidence in separate clean, unused, metal cans. Fasten and mark the cans with your initials,
             the date, exhibit number and other pertinent information.
        c.   Put objects to be in close proximity with the blast in metal cans. Mark them. Put metal objects form the
             explosive device in metal cans. Wrap items like wires and objects with tool marks in tissue paper
             secured with a tape. Mark the metal cans with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent
             information.
        d.   Evidence collected from the scene should not be placed in the same package together with the
             evidence obtained from the suspect.
        e.   Comparison standard should be packaged separately.
        a.     Find evidence from deactivated substances. Do not attempt to deactivate any explosive device
               unless you have been trained to do so.
        b.     Dust the mouth surface of the device for fingerprints.
        c.     If a tape or paper wrapping is found, put this in a clean unused metal can. Fasten the can and mark it
               with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent information. Do not handle any of
               these directly with your fingers.
        d.     Segregate materials such as batteries, wires, and cap fragments. Put them in a clean, unused metal
               cans making sure that items with tool marks should be wrapped in tissue paper and secured with
               tape. Mark the cans with your initials, the date, exhibit number and other pertinent information.
        e.     Put a 35 gram sample of the suspected explosive in a small, clean, unused metal container. Mark the
               container. Avoid sending explosives to mail.
        Food and drug specimens may link a suspect with the crime or corroborate other evidence. The succeeding
paragraphs outline the steps for gathering and preserving liquid, powder, and solid or plant material specimens.
1. Liquids
        2. Plant Materials
                                                                                                                   32
                  a.   Air dry samples by putting it on brown paper for twenty four hours.
                  b.   When thoroughly dried, put the evidence on a pillbox or a vial and fasten with tape.
                  c.   Package each sample separately.
                  d.   Weigh the contents.
                  e.   Mark the container with your initials, the date, and an exhibit number.
                  f.   Collect a comparison standard.
3. Powder or Solids
12. GLASS
         a. For wide mouth, insert two or more fingers inside it, then place it inside a hard cartoon container.
         b. For small mouth, place index finger on top and the thumb on the bottom, then place it in a hard cartoon
         container.
         c. Seal off and avoid contamination or stilling of contents that may destroy the evidentiary value.
2. Broken Glasses
3. Large Fragments
4. Small Fragments
        c. Using clean paper or plastic bags, carefully wrap each article of clothing where glass pieces were
           found.
        d. Put in separate bag all questioned glass fragments, separate from the known glass pieces.
        e. Securely fasten each bag and mark the same with your initials, the date and an exhibit number.
        f. Place footwear and other solid objects in separate containers such as shoe boxes. To prevent rattling
           and damaging the glass, tape each object to the bottom of the box.
        g. Do not pack articles containing microscope glass pieces in cotton or other soft material
        h. Secure each package thoroughly. Check if there are holes through which glass pieces might be lost.
        i. Keep loose glasses fragments in pillboxes, plastic or glass vials and fasten them completely. To
           prevent rattling and chipping of glass, place cotton inside the receptacle. Do not use envelopes as
           containers.
        j. Make sure that you tag all packages with your initials, the date and exhibit number.
        k. Do not forget to collect a comparison standard.
         To obtain a comparison standard for glass, collect comparison samples from the area nearest the point of
impact. Samples should be at least the size of a one-peso coin. Clearly tag each comparison sample with adhesive
tape bearing your initials, the date, and exhibit number. Wrap each comparison fragment according to the proper
procedures outlined above. When the direction of force will be analyzed, always collect a glass standard from any
remaining glass in a window or door as close.
          Liquids and viscous substance may be used to link a suspect to the crime or eliminate him from
consideration. These evidence readily evaporate and are easily contaminated, hence, utmost case is required during
collection. The succeeding paragraphs indicate how substances like alcohol, gasoline, glue, oil, etc. and comparison
standards should be gathered and preserved.
a. Liquids
b. Viscous Substance
                 a. For small Amounts= Get a cotton swab of the substance and put into a plastic bag. Fasten the
                    bag and mark.
                 b. For large Amounts= Place the substance inside a fastenable plastic container through the aid
                    of a cotton swab or a plastic spoon.
         If it is possible, put the substance into a clean unused tight-fitting metal can;
         If it too viscous to be poured, use a plastic spoon when putting it inside a container.
         If it is already kept in tight-fitting container, which is not more than one print, send it to the laboratory in
          its original container.
14. METALS
          Offenders in most crimes use metallic objects, such as knives or firearms, A metal can reveal information
like surface imperfections, scratches, and chemical composition. The e succeeding paragraphs reveal how to gather
and preserve metal evidence.
a. Fillings
b. Fragments
        1)    Fragments may come in the form of bullets, bullet fragments, grillwork, headlights frames, dies, etc.
              which may be embedded or embedded in walls, floor, etc.
        2)    For embedded fragments;
            Collect the evidence and put it in a plastic bag or in any appropriately sized container.
            Use padding materials when packaging the evidence to protect the identifying characteristics or the
             area along the fracture plane from damage.
            Fasten and name similar to procedure in Metals 1.
         Ask for the assistance of laboratory technicians, to remove the embedded fragments from the wall, floor
          etc.
         Pack as much of the material where the fragment is embedded in an appropriately sized container.
         Fasten the container and attach an evidence tag marked with your initials, the date and an exhibit
          number.
         Collect comparison standard.
c. Large sections
        1) Get photo of the obvious marks on doors or other materials, which are too massive to be removed.
           Don’t forget to place a scale beside the evidence when taking the photographs
        2) Protect the marks by casting them in silicon rubber compound.
        3) Pack and mark the cast similar to the procedure of impression of footprints but leave our “NORTH”
           marking
        4) Collect a comparison standard.
                  A door that has been forcibly opened is the place where a standard source for fillings found on the
        floor can be obtained. Gather, pack and mark the filings as in Metal Filings.
                 A file, a pry bar, or metal filings found on the offender’s shoes, cuffs, pockets, or other clothing
        parts represent the standard against, which evidence found from the crime scene can be matched. Gather,
        pack and mark the standard as shown in metal filing, fragments and large sections.
15. PAINTS
         Paint specimens may be liquid, chips or smudges. The succeeding paragraphs reflect how various forms of
paint and comparison standard can be gathered and kept.
i. Liquids
          1. Follow the procedure outlined for viscous substances in Liquid’s viscous substance
          2. Comparison Standard- Paint Chips and Smears
          3. Extract Paint Evidence- using a clean knife or peeling instrument from two spots where the paint was
             located and from the suspected source of the questioned paint. Try to collect at least ½ square inch of
             surface area for each evidence with all paint layers presented. Surrender all chips or peelings at hand.
             If the material is small, send the whole material. Pack and mark all items as indicated in paint samples.
16. SOIL
          Soil and mineral may reveal evidence that could link the offender to the crime, samples collected should
have soil characteristics similar to that of the crime scene area. The succeeding paragraphs indicate how dried mud,
dry soil, mud and comparison standards are gathered and kept.
a. Caked Mud
          1) When gathering pieces of cake mud, use an instrument such as spoon or knife. Clean the instrument
          right after using.
          2) Pack in a clean plastic bag any personal effects, like clothing and shoes containing traces of caked mud.
          Package the effects separate bags.
          3) Fasten each bag and mark your initials, the date and an exhibit number.
          4) Collect a comparison standard.
b. Dry Soil
c. Mud
          1) Utilize a clean knife and peel off the mud on materials that can not be sent to the laboratory
          2) Put the peelings in plastic or cardboard container
          3) Fasten the container and mark with your initials, the origin, the date and an exhibit number.
          4) Collect comparison standard
Dust = means small particles, which are fine enough to float in air and usually can be identified only by a
microscope.
1. Poisons - are any substances, which get inside a human body and causes serious injury or death.
         Most poisons are chemicals, medicines or natural products, which can cause illness or death. The detection
and identification of poisons in the body is called Toxicology.
               Besides collecting bottles, containers and dishes, the investigator should be present at the autopsy to
               gather specimens taken by thee doctor, like: vomits, urine, and stomach washings.
          This particularly applies in Traffic Accidents or if alcohol was used to facilitate the commission of a crime. It
is easier to detect and examine a person drunk than a person under the influence of liquor or not drunk. This can be
determines through chemical examination of the blood or urine,
              Alcoholic Beverages
                                                                                                                    36
                   The most common alcohol is ethyl or ethanol, which is called grain alcohol because it is usually
         made from grain products. Other common alcohols are Methyl used for lamps and isopropyl alcohol used for
         hair tonics and cosmetics. These two (2) kinds are very poisonous and do not produce a good feeling to
         persons who drink them. They are not commonly found in intoxication cases.
                   Alcohol in beverages comes from the chemical change of sugar. If grain is used to start, it must
         first be changed to sugar. The process is called MALTING. All intoxicating beverages are mostly water,
         alcohol and flavoring materials. These are added or may come from the burned barrels in which the
         beverages are stored. The burned woods of barrels give whisky and scotch its brown color.
          Even though the investigator has a blood or urine sample, he should also make certain tests of the person in
order to testify in court, such as:
                  a)   Balance
                  b)   Coordination
                  c)   Reaction time
                  d)   Eye condition and reaction to light
                  e)   Speech
                  f)   Breath odor
                  g)   Walking and turning ability
          The best sample for alcohol test is the blood and the nest is urine. Sodium benzoate is the best preservative
for urine and sodium fluoride for blood.
             a) Use clean bottles or jars – containers must have tight stopper or cover to avoid evaporating or
                spilling;
             b) Seal and label the specimen correctly – a tag would be better than labeling
             c) Give the laboratory all information – investigator must to the request a detailed report for the
                examiner to facilitate examination.
         Drugs come in several forms and are either abused. The investigator must take appropriate steps to acquire
physical evidence of used drugs ad paraphernalia. Subject person to examination.
The crime of causing a fire is called ARSON. Some motives of Arson are:
         a) Pyromaniacs – these are people with a mental condition who get pleasure in watching the fire burn or
            watching the firemen put out the fire.
         b) Frauds – set fire for insurance purposes
         c) Concealment of another crime
         d) Revenge
              All unusual physical evidence used to put the accused at the scene of the crime should be collected.
    These include broken glass, hair, fibers, soil, debris, etc. if the criminal used a liquid to set the fire, there is a
    possibility that this material may be on his clothing or shoes. Investigator should coordinate with experienced
    firemen to locate for materials used to start the fire. Ashes and containers must be properly sealed and wrapped
    to protect from evaporation, then marked properly before transmitting it to the laboratory for examination.
         Explosives are very delicate and dangerous to attend to, therefore, an experienced demolition expert has to
handle the situation.
         However, after an explosion, the investigator must conduct a proper photography of the areas affected.
Investigator must exert effort to look for fragments of torn metal from the bomb itself or bits of wood and cardboard
and parts of clocks used to set off the explosion. Found fragments must be placed in an envelope or container and
properly identified.
Biological Materials
         Blood is usually spilled inmost crimes of violence and the criminal may shed it while committing his crime. It
is the best specimen for testing alcohol in sobriety examinations, also in disputed paternity cases.
         An adult male has about 5,000 cc or 10 pints of blood unlike in females, which has 3,800 xx or 8 pints.
        Blood sample sent to the laboratory for examination is to determine its blood groupings. Samples from
suspects, if the investigator shall bring the suspect to the laboratory for extracting of blood samples.
2. Seminal Stains
         Semen is the male fluid, milky white fluid containing millions of small cells with tails called PERMATOZOA.
Each male ejaculation produces about 3.5 cc or a teaspoonful of semen. Semen is important physical evidence in
cases of seduction, rape, unnatural acts of perversion and bestiality with animals.
         The investigator should get the clothing of both the victim and suspect as soon as possible after the offense
was committed. The clothing must not be rolled or crumbled to avoid destruction of the spermatozoa. The alleged
victim must be subjected to a Physician’s examination to determine the presence of spermatozoa, injury and other
related details. Detailed interview and investigation must be done on the victim to determine other related factors
whether she maybe telling the truth or making a false accusation.
3. Hair
 Structure of Hair
                    Hair consists of a root, tip, and a shaft. All hairs have a root; if the hair has fallen naturally, the root
              is found to be dried up; if it was pulled out, the root is shaped like a bulb. There are several parts of a
              hair:
                   Hair evidence should be looked for on clothing, combs, weapons, in pockets, on the fingers of the
              victim and the suspect. Samples must be taken from both victim and suspect. Samples may be taken
              from the head and pubic hair. The best way of collecting hair samples is by combing. Investigator must
              at least submit 100 hair samples, which must be placed in a paper envelope and properly sealed and
              identified.
          Photographs should be taken. Soil sample should be collected. Do not attempt to remove hair or other
objects from the bones and do not attempt to wash or clean them in any way. A careful search for all teeth must be
made. A piece of wire screen can be used to sift all soil in the area to look for small bones or body particles, this
sometimes become the lead in the identify of the victim.
18.       Miscellaneous
         Materials like cigarette butts jewelry, magnetic tape recordings or writing instruments can link a person to a
crime since each provides easily identifiable features. For example, a tape recording of anonymous voices heard as
pale of the threat prior to a bombing or extortion may be associated with known voices of an offender through
voiceprint analysis, assuming there was careful recording of questions and known voices. The succeeding
                                                                                                                     38
paragraphs show how cigarette butts, jewelry, magnetic tape recording, writing instruments and comparison
standards are gathered and kept.
         a) Collect the cigarette butt using a piece of paper or tweezers and put on a
         small plastic bag. Never hold the cigarette butts with your hands.
         b) Label the bag with your initials, the date the source and an exhibit number.
         c) Clear tobacco material from papers or clothes pockets into a plastic pillbox. Label and fasten as above.
D. MARKING EVIDENCE
          Evidence must be marked to assure that its identity can be legally established in court. When evidence is
produced in court, it is imperative to prove it is the same as that found at the scene. Normal descriptions of items are
not sufficient; distinctive symbols or initials of the recovering officer, date when recovered and/or an
individual letter on each item of evidence collected should be used. These marks can be written, scratched or
carved, however, not to damage the item or alter its evidentiary value, by using the other methods of identifying such
as; labeling or tagging.
Exceptions:
        No attempt should be made to mark evidence, when:
        Objects, which are not suitable for markings must be tagged. A paper tag firmly affixed to the items of
evidence can serve as a basis for later identification.
Advantage: it provides for a greater space for recording pertinent data, such as:
                  1)   Case number
                  2)    Date & time when article was found
                  3)    Name and description of the article
                  4)    Location and time of recovery
                  5)    Signature of the investigator/finder
                  6)    Name of witness(es) to the recovery
        Physical evidence may be most effectively presented in court if it has been properly handled and preserved.
An analysis of evidence by the laboratory may be impossible, if the evidence has been altered or contaminated.
2. Containers
         The investigator should try to suit his containers to the sample. Due to bacterial or fungal actions it is
imperative that one does not put damp or biological evidence in plastic bags. The following is suggested:
     c. Vials, pill boxes, capsules and like containers are frequently suitable, depending upon the exhibit and its
        condition.
     d. Garments and large exhibits can be placed in bags or rolled in paper.
     e. Paper or plastic envelopes can be sealed around the ends of large exhibits such as tools, with plastic tape
        to prevent loss of adhering evidence.
     f. Loss of adhering evidence on large exhibits, such as safes, vehicle bumpers, etc., can be prevented by
        placing plastic paper over the vehicle and sealing it with tape.
     g. Always use clean and new containers to prevent contamination.
3. Storing Evidence
        Evidence should be stored in a safe, evidence vault, locker or some other location where unauthorized
persons do not have access to it. This applies to both temporary and long range storage.
          Proper handling of physical evidence is necessary to obtain maximum possible information upon which
scientific examination shall be based and to prevent exclusion as evidence in court. Specimens, who truly represent
the material, found at the scene, unaltered, unspoiled or otherwise unchanged in handling will provide more and
better information upon examination. Legal requirements make it necessary to account for all pieces of physical
evidence from the time it was collected until it is presented in court. With this in mind, the following principles should
be observed in handling all types of evidence:
          1. The evidence should reach the laboratory as mush as possible in the same condition as when it was
found;
            2. The quantity of specimen should be adequate. Even with the best equipment available, good results
cannot be obtained from insufficient specimens;
            3. Submit a known or standard specimen for comparison purposes.
            4. Keep each specimen from others so there will be no intermingling or mixing known and unknown
material. Wrap and seal in individual packages when necessary.
            5. Mark or label each piece of evidence for positive identification as the evidence taken from a particular
location in connection with the crime under investigation.
            6. The chain of custody of evidence must be maintained. Account for evidence from the time it is collected
until it is produced in court. Any break in this chain of custody may make the material inadmissible as evidence in
court.
         In order that examination can be performed promptly and permit ready reference to cases in a later date, it
is necessary that laboratory personnel have certain information about the evidence submitted and the case under
investigation. A separate written request should be prepared for each examination desired (e.g. for Ballistic Test, for
Chemistry Test, etc.). The request should contain the following information to accompany all evidence submitted to
the laboratory examination:
         1. Type of offense under investigation;
         2. Date, date and place of commission;
         3. Date when evidence was collected. (This may not be the same date as when the offense was
              committed.)
         4. Name of victim(s) and suspect(s); and their address;
         5. Name of the officer and office submitting the material;
         6. A list of specimens submitted and each instance a brief but comprehensive description of:
                   a) where the specimen was found in relation to other objects at the crime scene;
                   b) condition of the material when found peculiarity in any respect; and
                   c) any changes in the nature of the evidence, which the investigators may have made either
                       accidentally or unintentionally.
         7. Type of examination desired for each specimen submitted; and
         8. A brief summary of the facts of the case under investigation.
Before submitting the evidence to the laboratory, consult the following checklists.
    1. Personal Delivery of Evidence – is the best method, it will permit a personal contact for consultation between
    the criminalists and the investigator, which may be very beneficial.
    2. Mail Shipments of Evidence – use registered or certified mail if evidence is of high monetary value or if it is
    small and of critical value. Otherwise, first or fourth class mail is satisfactory.
    3. Prevent Damage – package contents so that breakage or contamination will not occur during shipment.
   4. Restrictions – Follow postal regulations. Do not mail explosives and other prohibited items.
    5. Seat package completely – even if fourth class mail is employed. Do not just tie with string, but rather employ
tape which meets postal service regulations.
   6. Place the cover latter on the outside of package.
   7. Express shipments packaging procedures are the same as for regular mail shipments.
           1. Explosives – Do not deliver or ship explosives to the lab without contacting the criminalists by telephone
first, he will evaluate the situation and indicate the procedures to be followed.
        2. Dangerous Materials – The same telephone contact must be made prior delivering loaded weapons,
dangerous chemicals, etc.
INTRODUCTION
         No matter how intelligent a person is when after several months or years, possible he can no longer
    remember everything. Settled has been the observation of luminaries, memory cheats sometimes the person.
    Notes taking or recording facts can never be substituted by memory alone. Courts usually allow a witness to
    refresh his memories through notes.
CONCEPT
        Notes taking and sketching are methods of documenting a crime incident, they are permanent records and
    are admissible in evidence, especially during rebuttal stage.
    WHAT ARE SOME OF THE STANDARD METHODS OF RECORDING INVESTIGATIVE DATA?
    RECORDING – refers to the act of writing down all pertinent and material facts and details surrounding the
    commission of a crime under investigation.
    1. NOTES TAKING – Specifically speaking, notes taking begins when the investigator arrives at the crime
       scene. He writes down the identity of persons involved in the incident. Writes down the condition of his
       surroundings and his observation to material evidence. He also draws a basic sketch of the crime scene and
       takes the initial photographs. This is to ensure that image of the crime scene is recorded before any
       opportunity occurs whereby the scene is disturbed.
Advantages:
         Purpose:
         a. Basis for action at higher levels
         b. Enables co-workers to take the next logical steps
         c. Establishes validity of complaint and indicates general nature and magnitude of the case (prosecutive
             action).
                                                                                                                    41
         Qualities of Notes:
         a. Clarity/clearness – use of simple words
         b. Accuracy/accurate – direct and certain
         c. Brief/brevity – short and concise but complete
         d. Specific – exactness of numbers, location, nature of case, etc.
         e. It answers the cardinal principles of investigation.
    SKETCH – is the simplest and most effective way of showing actual measurements and identifying significant
    items evidence in their location at the scene. It is admissible if it is reasonably related and explanatory of the
    testimony of the witness who drew it and used it to illustrate his testimony.
    MAPS & DIAGRAMS – are admissible as evidence when they are reasonably necessary to understand the
    testimony of witness/es and when a foundation of the accuracy is laid by the person who prepared the map or
    diagram.
A. Kinds of Sketch:
Query: Is the investigator allowed to have the rough sketch formalized by an artist?
Answer: Yes, provided it be under his supervision and direction.
B. Types of Sketches
C. Classes of Sketches
             1) Sketch to Locality – depicts the crime scene and its environment and roads leading to the location
                or house/crime scene.
2) Sketch of Grounds – this pictures the scene of the crime and its nearest physical surroundings.
             3) Sketch on Details – describes the immediate scene only. For example: the room in which the crime
                happened and the details thereof.
D. Surveying Methods
             2) Triangulation Coordinates/Method – measurements made from each of two fixed objects to the
                point where relevant pieces of evidence are, later on forming a triangle.
             4) Coordinates constructed on transecting base line – a stretched line from one fixed point of
                reference extended to another fixed point, the evidence are measured aligned with the base line.
             5) Compass Coordinates – a measuring device is stretched from one fix point of reference and the
                compass is used to detect the degree or position of the evidence.
             1) Title – brief narration or information about the incident, place, time, date committed, victims and the
                investigating officer.
             2) Time/date and weather condition – response time, condition of crime scene upon arrival.
             3) North Compass Direction – an arrow pointing to the direction of the north – for orientation
                purposes.
Note: Measurements must be accurate using appropriate standard measuring devices. Use of steps or
approximation must be avoided. Sketches are not substitute for notes or photographs, they are but a supplement to
them.
F. Rules in Sketching
CHAPTER VII
Interview – is the questioning of a person believed to possess knowledge that is of official interest to the investigator.
* Importance of Interview : Interview in crime investigation is very important as the person interviewed usually gives
his account of an incident under investigation or offers information concerning a person being investigated in his own
manner and words.
Interrogation – is the questioning of a person suspected of having committed an offense or a person who is
reluctant to make a full disclosure of information in his possession which is pertinent to the investigation.
           Criminal is Identified                Traced & Located          The facts providing his guilt
                                                                              are gathered for court
                                                                                    presentation
      1.     Eyewitness testimony    1. Vanity or flight – betrays guilt 1. Relevancy of Evidence
      2.     Confession/admission    * An investigator is no better than 2. Competency of Evidence
      3.     Circumstantial Evidence his information.                    3. Corpus Delicti
      a.     Motive                  2. Official & unofficial records    * Factum probandum
      b.     Opportunity             3. Pedigree, social, business & * Factum Probans
      c.     Associative Evidence    criminal history                    4. Knowledge of Laws
      d.     Tracing Evidence        4. Modus Operandi                   5. Legally obtained evidence
      e.     Rogues Gallery          5.Background Investigation          6. Fruits of a Poisonous tree
      f.     Portrait Parle          6. Surveillance
      g.     Cartography or artist’s 7. Associates/friends
             sketch
     Confidential informant – a person who provides confidential information concerning a past or projected
      crime and does not wish to be known as the source of the information.
   1. Adaptability – the ability to understand people from all walks of life, to meet them on their won level on varied
subjects and to adapt to their personalities and lifestyle.
    2. Self-control and Patience – the act of being professional, sympathetic yet uninvolved, waiting for responses
    while patiently leading the conversation and providing facts.
3. Confidence and Optimism - feel you are better education and thus must be in control of the interview.
    4. Objectivity – Maintain your perspective on what is sought, avoiding pre-conceived ideas about the case.
    5. Sensitivity to Individual Rights – Maintain a balance between the rights of others and those of society.
    6. Knowledge of the Elements of the Crime – Know what information you need to prove the elements of the
       crime you are investigating. Phrase questions to elicit information related to these elements.
B.1. Interview - the effectiveness of an investigator is largely dependent upon his ability to obtain information from
complainants, witnesses, informants, and suspects.
             “I” – Interview preparation – investigator acquaints himself to the case, prepares what he wants to
             establish or know from the subject
             “R” – Give the subject time to recall about the incident “Warm –up”
             “O” – Opening statement
             “N” – Narrative
             “I” – Inquiry
             “C” - Complement
4. Techniques in Questioning
             a. Precise questioning – restrict the range of information which the subject can give in an answer.
             b. Shunting – technique of asking question which relates the digression to the original line of
                questioning.
             c. Skipping by guessing – questions of intervening details which is an act of anticipating conclusions
                to skip probable outcome of the various stages of the subject’s recital.
6. Types of Interviews
             d. Children – permission to interview children must be obtained from parents or guardians; determine
                ability to discern.
                      (1) Boys – determine perception and intelligence, more on falsehood.
                      (2) Girls – intensely interested in the world as it reacts to her, observant to her young
                           neighbors.
             e. Young persons – not ideal witness, they are ideally preoccupied.
             f. Middle-aged persons –Ideal witness, they are keenly aware of his fellow beings.
             g. Older Persons – Very effective witness, they add maturity to judgment.
                                                                                                                 44
        Logical Approach – is based on reason. Use logic to determine why the person refuses to cooperate
        and to explain the benefits of cooperating. Explain the problems that result when people who know
        about a crime do not cooperate.
        Emotional Approach – addresses such negative feelings as hate, anger, greed, revenge, pride and
        jealousy. You can increase these emotions or simply acknowledge them by explaining to the person
        that “anyone else in the same situation would respond the same way.”
        Direct Question – is to the point, allowing little possibility of misinterpretation. Use this type that come
        right to the point.
        Indirect Question – is a bit disguised and could elicit a variety of answers. Use this type of questioning
        to those that skirt the basic question, sparingly.
        Cognitive Interview – a method that calls for using a secluded, quiet place that is free of distractions
        for the interview and encouraging subjects to speak slowly.
9. Evaluation
        a.   Physical Mannerisms – nervousness, evasive facial expressions, perspiration and similar signs
        b.   Frankness – truthfulness
        c.   Emotional state – reaction to questions
        d.   Content of statements – discrepancies and misrepresentations
Primary Objectives:
1.Miranda Doctrine
2. Sec. 12, Art. III, 1987 Constitution
3. Sec. 17, Art. III, 1987 Constitution
4. Waiver in relation to Art. 125, RPC as amended
5. Waiver in relation to RA 7438
6. Using deception or misrepresentation during Interrogation is illegal
7. Turf of the interrogation
8. Use of Third-Degree Tactics – use of physical force, threats of force or other physical, mental or
   psychological abuse – are illegal. Any information so obtained, including confessions, is inadmissible in
   court.
9. Language
1) General knowledge and Interest – must develop intellectual curiosity and keen observation
2) Alertness – constantly alert able to analyze subject accurately
                                                                                                                 45
Detection of Deception
1) Physiological Symptoms – emotional reactions are insight in determining guilty knowledge or deception.
    2) Lie Detection or Polygraphy – records of several measurements on a visible graph. The polygraph
       scientifically measures respiration and depth of breathing changes in the skin’s electrical resistance and
       blood pressure and pulse. The person does not actually have to respond verbally for a polygraph to work
       because the machine measures the mental and emotional responses regardless of whether the person
       answers questions.
Admissions – contains some information concerning the elements of the crime but falls short of a full confession. It
is a self-incriminatory statement by the subject falling short of an acknowledgement of guilt.
Confessions – is information supporting the elements of the crime given by a person involved in committing the
crime; or the direct acknowledgement of committing the crime. Confession – is a direct acknowledgment of the truth
of the guilty fact as charged or of some essential part of the commission of the criminal act itself.
Requisites of a Valid Confession:
Deposition – is the testimony of a witness reduced to writing under oath or affirmation, before a person empowered
to administer oaths, in answer to interrogatories (questions) and cross interrogatories submitted by the parties.
Ordinarily it is an attorney who gets depositions.
     Duress – imposition of restrictions on physical behavior (Ex. Prolonged detention, deprivation of food, sleep,
      etc.
     Coercion - connotes the idea of physical force; application of illegal physical methods
     Psychological Constraint – Free action of the will may be unlawfully restrained by threats or other methods
      of instilling fear.
Deception and Promises – No deception, promises, threats, tricks, or cajoling may be used to obtain from the
suspect a waiver of his rights.
     Employment of Promises
    Example:
       a) Release from Custody
       b) Lighter sentence
       c) Pardon, etc.
                                                                                                                       46
Ham letting – forcibly taking any relative of a suspect in exchange for the surrender or appearance of suspect.
Includes coercive act of forcing people to transfer or vacate their place of abode.
Truth Serums – are fast-acting barbiturates of the type used to produce sleep at the approximate level of surgical
anesthesia. The theory is that, the drug removes the person’s inhibitions so the person is more likely to tell the truth.
Commonly used drugs are the sodium amytol and sodium pentathol.
CHAPTER VIII
I. Terminologies:
    1. Written
    2. Oral/spoken
G- gather the facts – conduct thorough investigation, interview to witnesses and interrogate suspects;
R- record the facts – jot down in your notes relevant and material information, do not rely on your mind;
O- organize the facts – arrange the sequence of the incidents in an outline form;
        W- write the report – use simple words to construct short sentences; group related ideas into one
    paragraph.
         E- evaluate the report – edit and proof read it, you may have misspelled or there may have been lapses in
    the grammar construction.
a. Gather the facts – the patrolman being the first police officer to arrive at the scene, initiates only the basic process
of the investigation, such as:
           2) Keen observation and documenting the crime scene and surroundings, if possible.
                                                                                                                         47
b. Record the facts – To record the facts the police officer will write in his notes, the following:
         And will also conduct an exhaustive investigation, starting with the witness if victims was dead, search for
         other witnesses, interview doctors at the hospital and the medical officer at the morgue to learn the cause of
         death; seek information to identify more the victim, and search for voluminous facts to solve the case.
          Paragraphing is the vital link in a well organize report. Hence, all facts which are related to a particular
situation will be presented chronologically in paragraph.
          Presented hereunder are the three essentials of the narrative. It serves as a guide in paragraph construction
and sequence presentation of ideas;
         Setting:
                 a. When? – Time and date of occurrence
                 b. Where? – Place of occurrence – crime scene
         Characters:
                 a. Who? – Persons involved in the crime
                            Victim
                            Suspects
                            Witness
         Action:
                 a. What?- Nature of Crime
                 b. Why?- Motive
                 c. How? – Modus Operandi
         They explained that when writing a reports, it must be simple, definite, specific and factual. In composition,
essay or other kinds of writing can be imaginary or inferred or can be optionated. Inference based on reasoning while
opinion is a personal beliefs. Its sentence structure can be long with nice beautiful, high-sounding words –flattering
but may mean nothing.
Example:
        The victim lying on the ground is an unidentified female in her sweet sixteen, with an angelic face and
shapely body. IT is most unfortunate that he merciless killer stabbed her on her freshly blossoming breast.
         On the other hand, a police report writing is written in a simplest declarative sentence styling . Its diction is
devoid of wordiness. One idea in one paragraph. It is factual.
Example:
           The victim is female, about 16 years old, oval shape face, light-brown complexion, about 1051lbs.? about
5’2” tall. She was stabbed on her left breast by and unknown assailant.
1. CLARITY – use of simple words/terms not high or impressive words that requires the reader to consult the
Webster.
        Before you start to write, always decide what the exact purpose of your reporting; and make sure that every
paragraph, every sentence, every word, make a clear contribution to that purpose and make it at the right time.
How?
              a. Avoid impressive expressions
                                                                                                                    48
Example: Ten (10) KIA, One Hundred (100) M-16 Armalite Rifles, Five Hundred (500) Armalite Live ammunitions.
Wordy Brief
4. SPECIFICITY
         Use language that is simple, definite, specific, accurate, factual and familiar. Make sure that you write the
essential ingredients of the report. Avoid too long discussion as long as you have the express the real incident in the
case.
Example: An automobile – this is wrong. It should be . . . 1990 Toyota Corolla colored red with license plate number
ABT 007.
5. ATTRACTIVITY
         Make your report attractive (neat, clean and arranged/formatted), the reader will have an interest
looking/reading it.
              a.   Proper Capitalization
              b.   Proper Abbreviation
              c.   Proper punctuation
              d.   Proper Indention
              e.   Proper Spelling
1. Sentence Structure
Sentence – a group of words having a subject and predicate expressing a complete thought.
             a) Police Sentence – is the same as any common grammatically structured narrative sentence with the
             usual subject, predicate and verb. The only deviation is the use of police words, phrases, and other
             terminologies without being too technical, legal and vulgar.
             b) Correctness in the Sentence – it is necessary to pay special attention to the key words:
                       Verbs
                       Pronouns
                       Adjectives
                       Adverbs
             b) Dictation – means the correct choice of words though selecting the exact, precise, definite objectives
             of words to convey a meaning.
3. Paragraph Construction
              b) Introductory Paragraph – is commonly the first paragraph in the investigative report which objective
             is to readily point out the reader the main point.
Characteristics of a Paragraph:
                (1) Write Short Paragraph – if the ideas are presented in similar units, the reader of the report can
                easily follow the events from one sentence to another.
                 (2) Give your Reader a Rest – voluminous and exhaustive an investigative report maybe, if the
                 reporter can give his reader a period of rest.
                 (3) Recapture your Reader’s Attention – after giving a rest in between paragraphs he should not let
                 her/him asleep. Instead he must recaptured his interest
             1. The Topic Sentence – is the first sentence immediately at the beginning of the next or ensuing
                paragraph. Importantly, in investigative report
             2. The Linking Word- in order to hold the attention of our readers, the order of presenting the ideas in
                each paragraph must be in sequence. This is a complied by the use of linking words and phrases,
                bridging the ideas of a previous paragraph wherein the reader can look back at the proceeding
                sentence or forward to the forthcoming sentence of the next paragraph.
    4. Spelling – spelling mistakes might cause your reader to think you’re careless or stupid. Correct spelling in
    important not only for impression but also for accuracy. A misspelled name, for example may cause serious
    problems in future investigation in the case.
    5. Homonyms - is a word that sounds like another word but has a different meaning and spelling.
    Ex. Aisle- a passageway between rows of seats /     Isle- an island
        Altar- a place of worship/   Alter- to change
    6. Division of Words – technically, the improper division of words is not an     error in spelling.
    Nevertheless, a mistake committed makes the reader of there port confused with the impression that the word
    has been misspelled
                          Ex. Sus- pect sui- cide mur - der
    7. Capitalization and Numbers – some writers have the tendency to over capitalize the objectives to
    emphasize.
                  Ex. This is a Case of Murder wherein the victim was Maria Malas, 23 years, single, Flight
                  Stewardess of the Philippine Airlines, residing at Calachuchi Road, Fairview Park, Quezon City.
    8. Abbreviations - in order to conserve energies and space, the use of some abbreviations are allowed.
    However clarity should not sacrificed for brevity and using abbreviations must confined only to those words of
    common usages and widely accepted locally or internationally. However in actual report writing we limit the use
    of abbreviation to titles, addresses, time and name of agencies referred to as initials.
    9. Punctuations – is a customary little marks that determine whether a sentence is clear or has doubtful
    meaning.
* Kinds of Punctuation
b) Question Mark- use after a question or after that part of sentence which ask question
             d) Comma -used before coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or….) which joins two separate
             independent clauses.
             e) Semicolon- use between two independent clause of a compound sentence when conjunctions such
             as and, but, not, for, yet, and so are omitted.
g) Quotation Mark- use to set off the exact word spoken or written by other person.
i) Parenthesis- use when numerals are placed in formal enumeration within the sentence
         1. Spot Report or Incident Report – It must be prepared and submitted immediately after the preliminary
investigation of the incident had been done. It must briefly answer the cardinal principles of investigation. It shall
serve as information of the immediate senior officer of the unit for several purposes, such as:
         a. His consumption for an intelligent and responsive decision or plan of action
         b. Responses to inquiries by higher officers
         c. Responses to inquiries from the media
         2. Initial Investigation Report – It consist a brief narration of the facts of the incident answering the
cardinal principles of investigation and enumerating/identifying related found/collected pieces of evidence. It will
serve as basis for the incoming investigator to push through or continue with the investigation or follow – up of the
case.
         3. Progress Investigation Report – It consist narrative reports of progress as a result of the continuing
process of investigation; it may or may not repeat what has been reported in the initial investigation report unless it
shall present a more detailed or references to the new established facts of the case. It shall have the following parts:
             I.   Authority: It contains the Complaint Number and Case Number (this is observed in bigger police
                  stations) ; or the Police Blotter Entry Number; or upon whose instructions the investigation has
                  been proceeded.
             II. Matters Investigated or Matters to be Investigated – It shall state the nature of the offense,
                 identities of victim/s, their personal data and addresses, time and place of incident and the
                 identity/ies of the perpetrators, if known.
             III. Facts of the Case – It shall state the essential narration of the facts and circumstances together
                  with related and competent testimonies and pieces of identified and marked physical evidences.
                  Status of victims, arrested suspects and evidences.
                                                                                                                     51
            IV. Discussion – It contains related laws violated that would probably establish a prima – facie case
                against the accused and that complainant/victim has sufficient grounds to establish proof of the
                accusation or complaint.
            VI. Recommendations – It shall contain what the investigator believes the case must be after a
                careful perusal of the facts, circumstances and evidence gathered.
Note:
Investigative Reports must contain the annexes identified in the report, such as:
       One of the stages of an investigative process where the facts, incidents and circumstances are recalled and
   narrated by a person who has personal knowledge surrounding the commission of the offense under
   investigation. It serves as a permanent record.
Appropriate tools and related requirements are used by an investigator in order that justice prevails.
   Sworn Statement – it is a narration of facts and circumstances surrounding the commission of a crime, the
   declarant have knowledge thereof. The questions are propounded exhaustively and controlled by the
   investigator in order to establish complete information the declarant has to say. All answers to the questions
   must not be in an implied manner, meaning, the answer of “Yes” or “No” must be avoided.
   Affidavit – is a narration of facts prepared by the Affiant himself of what he believes about an incident. This is
   often considered self – serving meaning it is “one – sided” or beneficial only to the Affiant himself. To test
   personal knowledge – the Affiant must be subjected to cross-examination before the court or any administrative
   body that has jurisdiction over the case under scrutiny.
   Deposition – It is information from a deponent in answer to interrogatories from both parties of the case under
   the order of a court or body handling the case.
They are the party who stands to be benefited in the suit or the party entitled to the avails of the suit.
   a) Plaintiff (civil)/Complainant (criminal) – those having intent in the subject matter of the action or in obtaining
      the relief demanded.
   b) Defendant (civil)/Accused (criminal) – persons who claim an interest in the controversy necessary to
      complete the determination or settlement of the questions involved therein.
   a. A sworn statement/affidavit
   b. charging a person of an offense
   c. subscribed by the offended party, any peace officer or other public officer charged with the enforcement of the
   law violated.
   a. Offended party
                                                                                                                   52
a. To inform the accused of the nature and cause of accusation against him.
b. To notify the accused of the criminal acts imputed to him so that he can duly prepare his defense.
          Characteristics of a Sworn Statement:
    a.   Miranda Doctrine (Sec. 12, Art. III of the 1987 Phil. Constitution
    b.   RA No. 7438
    c.   Use of humane and good rapport
    d.   Appropriate dialect, language
a. Investigator taking down the sworn statement of the witness or victim must have a complete idea or information
about the facts of the case;
c. Begin the investigation with an interview or preliminary conversation. The purpose is to determine whether or not
the witness has knowledge about the incident.
d. Questions using the Five (5) W’s and l H must not be limited to one or two questions when the situation requires
adapting several questions especially when the declarant appears to be giving a partial answer.
e. Investigator must be guided with the different requisites or elements of the crime as basis for the questions to be
propounded.
g. The questions propounded must be sequential according to the chain of events the declarant has narrated.
h. Questions raised must be simple and in the dialect spoken and understood by the declarant.
i. Sometimes, intentional mistakes done by the investigator as an strategy is allowed in order that declarant shall
make the necessary corrections and consequently shall serve as proof that declarant has proofread it. This is allowed
provided no thoughts shall have been included except those that declarant has narrated.
j. The use of profane and deceiving tactics in the process is not allowed and must be avoided.
k. After the taking of the sworn statement, the declarant must be instructed to read his sworn statement and make
necessary corrections, if any. Sign it and to subscribe the same before an officer allowed by law to administer oath,
otherwise the sworn statement shall be considered a mere scratch of paper.
l. If a relative is around, the relative can sign as a witness to the taking of the sworn statement.
VII. Glossary
10. Direct Evidence – evidence which is in itself, if true, conclusively establishes a fact in issue and directly
    identifies the culprit.
11. Discernment – mental capacity to fully appreciate the consequences of an unlawful act.
12. Evidence – testimony, writings, material objects or other things presented to the senses that are offered to
    prove the existence or non-existence of a fact.
13. Exhibits – all physical and documentary evidences offered and marked during trial
14. Facts or circumstances – these events or incidents
15. Identity – proof of a person’s identity as being the individual alleged in the accusatory pleading.
16. Material – if it is so important or substantial, properly influencing the outcome of the trial, directed to prove a
    fact in issue.
17. Personal Knowledge – the test is recollection of what has been observed
18. Presumption – the inference of one fact from the existence of a related fact
19. Prima-facie Evidence – sufficient to establish truth
20. Proof – is the effect or result of evidence
21. Relevance – is the connection between a fact offered in evidence and the issue is proved. Establishes
    probability or improbability.
22. Relief – what is prayed for (actual, exemplary, etc.)
23. Situs Delicti – (venue) place or area in which a crime was committed
24. Witness – a person who has information about the issue subject of investigation
COURT DUTIES
    The ultimate goal of a criminal investigation is determining the truth – the facts that will establish the
innocence or guilt of people related to a crime. Here, as in all other phases of criminal investigation, objectivity,
accuracy and thoroughness are essential.
      Investigators are responsible for preparing cases for court and presenting testimony in court. Their role is
critical in the quest for justice. From the receipt of the initial complaint to court appearance, investigators play a
key role in a criminal justice system.
    1. Review and evaluate all evidence, positive and negative - Concentrate on proving the elements of the
crime and on establishing the offender’s identity.
    2. Review all reports on the case – Review all written reports done during the completion of the
investigation.
     3. Prepare Witnesses – Re - interview witnesses to refresh their memories. Read their previous statements
to them and ask if this is the evidence they will present in court.
            3. Final Preparations – Shortly before the trial, again review your notes and your
            final report. Take with you only those notes you want to use in testifying. Check to be certain that the
            physical evidence is being taken to the courtroom and will be available for the prosecuting attorney when
            needed. Also make sure that laboratory technicians are available to appear when they are required
         1. Judge – presides over the trial, rules on the admissibility of the evidence and procedures, keeps order in
the court, interprets the law and passes sentence if the defendant is found guilty.
            2. Prosecutor – controls the prosecute of the criminal case and represent the state in prosecuting the law
violated.
          4. Complaining Witness (victim) – Testifies and establish proof that a law has been violated, there was an
intrusion to his/her constitutional rights and that the defendant is liable thereof.
G. Sequence of a Criminal Trial – The trial begins with the case being called from the court docket. If both the
prosecution and the defense are ready, the case is presented before the court.
Direct Examination – is the initial questioning of a witness or defendant by the lawyer who is using the person’s
testimony to further his or her case.
Cross – Examination – is questioning by the opposing party for the purpose of assessing the validity of the testimony.
H. Testifying under Direct Examination – As witness, what is at stake is your credibility, professionalism,
competence, judgment, conduct in the field, adherence to official policies, observance of defendant’s rights and
knowledge.
What are nonverbal factors? – This pertains to the appearance, look and movements an officer appears in court,
this includes: dress, eye contact, posture, gestures, distance, mannerisms, rate of speech and tone of voice.
J. Testifying under Cross – Examination - Cross – examination is usually the most difficult part of testifying. The
defense attorney will attempt to cast doubt on your direct testimony in an effort to win an acquittal for the defendant.
During cross –examination the defense attorney might:
K. Concluding Your Testimony – Do not leave the stand until instructed to do so by the counsel or court. As you
leave the witness stand, do not pay special attention to the prosecution, defense counsel, or defendant. Return
immediately to your seat in the courtroom or leave the room if you have been sequestered. If you are told you may be
needed for further testimony, remain available. If told you are no longer needed, leave the courtroom and resume
your normal duties/activities. To remain gives the impression you have a special interest in the case.
                                                                                                                    56
L. Summary
        To prosecute or not to prosecute is often a question. Some cases are never prosecuted because the
complaint is invalid, it is exceptionally cleared, or no evidence or leads exist. If the decision is made to prosecute,
thorough preparation is required.
End
References:
    Bennett, Wayne W. and Karen M. Hess. Criminal Investigation, Fifth Edition. West/
              Wadsworth Publishing Company, a Division of International Thomson
              Publishing Inc., USA, 1988.
    Lapina, Diosdado G. Crime Investigation in the Philippine Setting: A Study for Criminology Students, PCCr,
               Manila, Philippines. 1991.
    Martin, Ruperto. Rules of Court of the Philippines. Volume V, Premium Book Store, Manila, Philippines.
                                                                                                                 57
Saferstein, Richard. Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Science. Printice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
            1981.
Sison, Carmelo V, Atty. Gisella N. Dizon-Reyes and Mr. Anzen P. Dy. Special Criminal Laws. Manila, 2006.
Sunico, Lorenzo A and Elliot B. Hansel. Forensic Chemistry Manual. Police Commission. Manila, Philippines
Tradio, Cirilo M. Handbook of Criminal Investigation. Central Law Book Publishing Co., Inc., 1982.
Walls, Hamish J. Forensic Science. London: Sweet and Maxwell Publishers, 1988 ed.
Manual on Scene of Crime Operation SOCO, PNP Crime Laboratory Service, Camp Crame, Quezon City, 1995.
PNP Investigative Manual. Directorate for Investigation, Camp Crame, Quezon City, 1992.
PNP Operational Procedures. Directorate for Investigation and Detective Management, Camp Crame, Quezon
         City. September 19, 2002.
Police Science Manual. Crime Laboratory and Research Training Department, Fort Bonifacio, Makati City,
           September 1995.