Human Rlghts Best Practiees lor Crtminal Courts                &   Police
tesponsible for the said article against Indulging in such trial by media
         However, to prevent any further issue being raised in this regard, we treat
                                                                                     when the issue       ubjudiced.
                                                                                     this matter as cdosed and hope
         that the other cocerned In journalism would take note of this displeasure expressed by us for interfering
         with the administration of justice.
         (11.)      For the reasons stated above. these a00eals succeed and the same are allowed.
                                              2009-ALLMR(CRI)-O-3289
                                              HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
                                             Hon'ble Judge{s):A.B. CHAUDHARI, J.
    SURESH KRISHANRAO POL
                                          ....Vs....   STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                                           Mar 03,2009
   G, P.C - Section 438- Anticipatory Bail - Murder Case -1.P.C. 302, 34                       - There is no
                                                                                                             allegatio
   against petitioner that he hit the deceased with dangerous weapons - Anticipatory bail granted
  JUDGEMENT
  (1.)           HEARD     learned counsel for rival parties.
                   an application for grant of anticipatory bail for the offence punishable under Sectic
                 THIS is
  (2.)
 read with Section 34 of indian Penal Code registered by Dattapur polike Station, Distict Amravat
 Crime no. 65 of 2008.
                                                                                     only namdeo Nand
 (3.)       Ihave perused the case dairy. The First Information Report shows that
                                                              some more statements were recorded. In
and Purushottam were named. It appears that thereafter
                                                no allegation that the present application hit the dece
the present applicant is concerned, there is
                                                                      Namdeo nandardhane about th
any dangerous weapon. Allegation is against Purushottam and
                                                                on anticipatory bail.
assault. In view of this, the applicant deserves to be released
                                                                                      No. 700/08 place
                Court
             THIS     had, upon perusal of the document (Ex. 14) in Mis. Cri. Appln.
 (4.)                                                                                              cor
                        to District Government   Pleader,  amravati, called the explanation of the
0. Dattapur, addressed
                           as                 provisions and   on what basis he gave no objection fo
  .0. vide order 3-2-2009,    to under  what                                                          c
                              case             The  learned  a. P. P. invited my attention to para 6
the applicant on bail in the        of murder.
                                                            concerned   P.S.0.  on the ground that n
                         no  objection  was given  by  the
which affirms that such
                                             f   name of Namdeo is mentioned as assailant of the
                                                        the