Module 3
Module 3
Syllabus
Patents: Conditions for Obtaining a Patent Protection, To Patent or Not to Patent an Invention,
Rights Associated with Patents, Enforcement of Patent Rights, Inventions, and Eligible for
Patenting, Non-Patentable Matters, Patent Infringements, Avoid Public Disclosure of an
Invention before Patenting.
Process of Patenting: Prior Art Search, Choice of Application to be Filed, Patent Application
Forms, Jurisdiction of Filing Patent Application, Publication, Pre-grant Opposition, Examination,
Grant of a Patent, Validity of Patent Protection, Post-grant Opposition, Commercialization of a
Patent, Need for a Patent Attorney/Agent, Can a Worldwide Patent be Obtained, Do I Need First
to File a Patent in India, Patent Related Forms, Fee Structure, Types of Patent Applications,
Commonly Used Terms in Patenting, National Bodies Dealing with Patent Affairs, Utility
Models
      Broadly, IP comprises of two branches i.e. Copyrights and Related Rights and Industrial
       Property Rights.
           o Copyrights and Related Rights refer to the creative expressions in the fields of
                 literature and art, such as books, publications, architecture, music, wood/stone
                 carvings,   pictures,   portrays    sculptures,   films    and    computer-based
                 software‘s/databases.
           o The Industrial Property Rights refer to the Patents, Trademarks, Trade Services,
                 Industrial Designs and Geographical Indications
      Copyright: Copyright is the right bestowed on the owner or creator in relation to
       publication, and distribution of a piece of writing, music, picture or related works.
       Copyright also applies to technical contents such as software, datasheets and related
       documents.
      Patents: A patent is a legal record that bestows the holder the exclusive right over an
       invention as per the claims, in a limited geographical domain and for a limited duration
       by thwarting possible interested parties from any form of manufacture, use or sale of the
       product or outcome of the invention
      Trademarks: A trademark is a sign that suitably differentiates the owner‘s goods or
       services from those of others
      Trade services: Any services in relation to trade or any trade related financing, lending
       or other financial accommodation provided(or to be provided) by the bank, including but
       not limited to issuance/amendment of letter of credit, document arrival under letter of
       credit, application for negotiation and inquiries etc.,
      Industrial Designs: An industrial design protection is related to certain specific
       ornamental shapes associated with products whose duplication the owner may wish to
       prevent
      Geographical Indications: A geographical indication (GI) is a name or sign used on
       products which corresponds to a specific geographical location or origin. Items that meet
       geographical origin and quality standards may be endorsed with a government-issued
       stamp which acts as official certification of the origins and standards of the product.
      Creativity being the keystone of progress, no civilized society can afford to ignore the
       basic requirement of encouraging the same. The economic and social development of a
       society is largely dependent on creativity.
      The protection provided by the IPR to the creators/innovators is in fact an act of
       incentivization for encouraging them to create more and motivates others to create new.
      However, if IPR is practiced rigidly, it may have a negative impact on the progress of
       society. For example, compliance with the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
       Rights (TRIPS) Agreement has affected the farming community as they are unable to
       store seeds for the next crop. Multinational companies regulate the price of seeds, which
       is generally beyond the reach of a majority of the farmers.
      To circumvent the negative impact of IPR, certain laws, exceptions and limitations
       associated with IPR have been enacted to maintain a balance between the interests of the
       creators/inventors and the community.
      For example, farmers rights under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights
       (PVP&FR) Act, 2001 entitles them to many privileges, such as Rights on seeds provides
       rights to the farmers to save seeds, use seeds and share, exchange or sell seeds to other
       farmers.
      Right to protection against accusations of infringement protects the farmers from
       infringement and other legal accusation levied upon them due to his legal ignorance in
       using other‗s plant varieties.
      The use of copyrighted material for education and religious ceremonies is exempted from
       the operation of the rights granted in the Copyright Act.
      Similarly, a patent can be revoked in favor of compulsory licensing by the government
       during an emergency or a natural calamity.
      In addition, if an invention/creation is not in the interest of society, it is not registered by
       the government for grant of any rights associated with IP. For example, cloning of human
       embryos is banned for IP protection, and so is the creation of super microbial pathogens,
       which can play havoc with human lives.
IP GOVERNANCE
      Since IP is an integral component of human society, each and every nation has dedicated
       agencies for laying out the guidelines, implementation and enforcement of IP related
       matters.
      In India, many organizations/agencies deal with various aspects of IP. The governance of
       all categories of IP, except the Plant Variety and Farmers Rights Act, is carried out by the
       Department for Promotion of Industry & Internal Trade (DPIIT) under the aegis of
       Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Govt. of India.
      There are a few other dedicated organizations/departments established by the government
       to     promote   patent-ecosystem     (patent   awareness,    patent    filing   and   patent
       commercialization) in India e.g. Technology Information Forecasting and Assessment
       Council (TIFAC), National Research Development Corporation (NRDC) and Cell for
       IPR Promotion and Management (CIPAM), etc.
      In order to create a hassle-free exchange of IP related activities amongst all the nations, it
       is imperative to have minimum standards of rules and regulations pertaining to all aspects
       of IP including rights, empowerment, exceptions, etc.
      To achieve this goal, the United Nations (UN) has established an organization called the
       World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
      This agency is at the forefront of imparting knowledge about IP and governs international
       filing and registration of IP through various Conventions and Treaties like Paris
       Conventions, Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), Rome Convention, Berne Convention,
       etc.
      IP, especially patents, is considered as one of the important cogs in assessing the
       innovation index of a nation.
      The global ranking organizations always have IP or a subset of IP as one of the
       parameters for understanding and grading the Science, Technology and Innovation (STI)
       ecosystem of a nation.
      For example, the Scimago (publically available online portal which ranks journals and
       countries based on the data taken from Scopus) 2020 report ranked India at 4th position
       in the parameter of a number of Research Publications and 50th position in the parameter
       of Intellectual Property Rights.
      The global ranking can be improved by sensitizing the teaching and scientific
       communities about the importance of IP and creating infrastructure for the same in the
       institutes of higher learning.
ORIGIN OF IP
      Though there is no official record of the origin of IP, it is believed that a rudimentary
       form of IP was being practiced around 500 Before the Common Era (BCE) in Sybaris, a
       state of Greece.
      The natives of Sybaris were granted a year‗s protection for using their intellect to create
      any new improvement in luxury.
      A practical and pragmatic approach for IP governance started taking shape in medieval
       Europe. In 1623, Britain passed an Intellectual Property Legislation which entitled guilds
       (association of artisans or merchants) to create innovations and bring them to market for
       trade purposes.
      However, this legislation brought a lot of resentment amongst the public, and thus was
       replaced by the Statute of Monopolies‗, which gave the rights to the original
       creator/inventor for 14 years. Another legislation, Statute of Anne‗, was passed by the
       British parliament in 1710.
      This legislation aimed at strengthening copyrights by providing rights to the authors for
       recreation and distribution of their work. The work could also be renewed for another 14
       years.
      By the end of the 18th century and the beginning of the 19th century, almost every
       country started laying down IP legislation to protect their novel inventions and creations.
HISTORY OF IP IN INDIA
Patents
      The history of the Indian patent system dates back to the pre independence era of British
       rule. The first patent related legislation in India was Act VI of 1856, adapted from the
       British Patent Law of 1852. The objective of this legislation was to encourage the
       inventions of new and useful manufactures.
      At the beginning of the 20th century, all the earlier Acts related to inventions and designs
       were done away with the introduction of ―The Indian Patents and Designs Act‖ 1911 (Act
       II of 1911).
      As per this Act, the governance of patents was placed under the management of the
       Controller of Patents. In the next three decades, many amendments were introduced for
       reciprocal arrangements with other countries for securing priority dates. These
       amendments dealt with;
                o Use of invention by the government
                o Patent of Addition
                o Enhancing the term of the patent from 14 years to 16 years.
                o Filing of Provisional Application and submission of Complete Application
                      within 9 months from the date of filing the application.
      Keeping the national interest in mind, recommendations were made in 1949 as a
       modification to existing ―The Indian Patents and Designs Act‖. And those
       recommendations are as follows
           o Misuse of patents rights needs to be prevented.
           o There must be a clear indication in the Act that food, medicine and surgical and
                curative devices should be made available to the masses at the cheapest rate by
                giving reasonable compensation to the owner of the patent.
           o Amendments in Sections 22, 23 and 23A of the Patent and Design Act, 1911 on
                the lines of the UK Patent Act.
      These recommendations were introduced in the Act XXXII of 1950.
      Two years later, another amendment (Act LXX of 1952) was made to provide
       compulsory licensing of patents related to food, drugs and chemicals killing insects and
       microbes. Based on these amendments, a bill was presented in the parliament in 1953 but
       was rejected.
      In 1957 a committee was constituted and the committee submitted its report to the
       government in 1959. It comprised of two segments addressing
           o General aspects of the patent laws, and
           o Bill rejected back in 1953.
      The revised patent legislation was submitted to the Lok Sabha in 1965. After many
       hiccups, clarifications and modifications the Patents Act, 1970
      In 1999, The Patents (Amendment) Act, 1999 was introduced providing for the filing of
       applications for ‗Product Patents‗ in the areas of drugs, pharmaceuticals and
       agrochemicals
      The new Patent Act also included provisions for the grant of Exclusive Market Rights
       (EMRs) for the distribution and sale of pharma products on fulfillment of certain
       conditions. The second amendment to the 1970 Act was made through the Patents
       (Amendment) Act, 2002 (Act 38 of 2002). This Act introduced new Patent Rules, 2003,
       thus replacing the earlier Patents Rules, 1972.
      With the rapidly changing scenario of IPR at a global level, a need was felt to further
       amend the Patent Act, 1970. The highlight of the Patents (Amendments) Act 2005 were:
           o Product patent for inventions in all fields of technology.
           o New forms of known substances excluded to prevent ever greening of the patent.
           o Rationalization of the opposition procedure.
           o Introduction of pre-grant opposition by representation.
           o Introduction of post-grant opposition.
           o Compulsory license for export purposes.
           o Compulsory license for manufacture.
           o Extension of grace period from 6 months to 12 months for filing a patent, if
                published in government exhibition.
      The concept of copyrights started way back in the 15th century. However, the actual need
       for copyrights law was felt only after the invention of printers and copiers.
      Before the invention of printers, writing could be created only once. It was highly
       laborious and the risk of errors was involved in the manual process of copying by a
       scribe.
      The evolution of copyrights law in India occurred in three phases. First, two phases were
       enacted during the British Raj.
           o In the first phase, the concept of copyrights was introduced in 1847 through an
                 enactment during the East India Company‗s regime. The term of copyrights was
                 for the lifetime of the author plus seven years after death. The registration of
                 copyright was mandatory for the enforcement of rights under the Act. The
                 government could grant a compulsory license to publish a book if the owner of
                 the copyright, upon the death of the author, refused to allow its publication.
           o In the second phase Indian legislature, under the British Raj, enacted the
                 Copyright Act of 1914 based on the Imperial Copyright Act (1911) of the UK. An
                 Act for criminal sanction for an infringement was introduced.
           o The third phase of the copyrights regime was witnessed post-independence. The
                 Copyright Act 1957 was enacted, superseding the Indian Copyright Act, 1914, in
                 order to suit the provisions of the Berne Convention (1886).
      The 1957 Act has been amended six times (1983, 1984, 1992, 1994 and 1999, 2012), to
       comply with WIPO Copyright Treaty (WCT), 1996 and WIPO Performances and
       Phonograms Treaty (WPPT), 1996.
      India is an active member of nearly all significant international Conventions/Treaties
       related to Copyright Law e.g. the Berne Convention as modified in Paris in 1971, the
       Universal Copyright Convention (1951), the Rome Convention (1961), WCT, WPPT and
       (TRIPS, 1995).
Trademarks
      The first statutory law related to Trademarks (TM) in India was the Trade Marks Act,
       1940, which was carved out from the Trade Marks Act, 1938 of the UK.
      It was followed by the incorporation of provisions of TM stated in the Indian Penal Code,
       Criminal Procedure Code and the Sea Customs Act.
      Later on, Trade Marks Act, 1940 was rechristened as Trade and Merchandise Marks Act,
       1958.
      Nearly four decades later, this Act was repealed by the Trade Marks Act, 1999. The need
       for this occurred to comply with the provisions of the TRIPS. It is the current governing
       law related to register TM.
Geographical Indications
Industrial Design
      The need to protect Industrial Designs (ID) was recognized in the 18th century and the
       Indian legislation enacted the ―Patterns and Designs Act‖ in 1872 for the first time. The
       Act was enacted to protect the rights over the creation of the designs and novel patterns
       by the inventors.
      The Act was replaced by the British Patents and Designs Act in 1907, which later became
       the basis for the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911.
      In 1970, a separate Act was enacted for the patent, i.e. the Patent Act, 1970. The Indian
       Patents and Designs Act, 1911, remained in force for designs only.
      Finally, in the year 2000, a dedicated Act for the ID was passed, which came into force in
       2001.
      In the 21st century, Information Technology (IT) has revolutionized the economic and
       societal growth of the world economy.
      The rapid and tremendous scientific advancements in the field of IT resulted in the
       creation of a new class of IP called the Layout-Design of the Semiconductor Integrated
       Circuits. Various organizations, including WTO and TRIPS Agreement laid down rules
       and regulations regarding the protection of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits and Layout
       Designs (SICLD)
      India being a member of the WTO also passed an Act called the SICLD Act, 2000. This
       Act is TRIPS compliant and fulfils the conditions of the TRIPS agreement (Articles. 35
       to 38) concerning the protection of SICLD.
Plant varieties
      Till 1970s, not much emphasis was laid on patentable matter originating from animals
       and plants. However, microbes and microbial products/processes were patentable.
      To include all kinds of biological materials under the ambit of patent laws, a decision to
       enact a new sui generis law under the International Convention for the Protection of New
       Varieties of Plants (UPOV, 1978) and UPOV, 1991 was taken.
      These decisions were taken to address environmental and public interest concerns.
      The Indian Patents Act, 1970 excludes ―plants and animals in whole or any part thereof
       other than microorganisms‖ from patentability.
      To comply with the mandate of Article 27.3 (b) of TRIPS, India adopted the Protection of
       Plant Varieties and Farmers Rights (PPV&FR) Act, 2001 as a sui generis regime
       protecting not only new plant varieties but also farmer‘s rights.
Biodiversity conservation
      In 1927 the ―Indian Forest Act‖ and later on the ―Wildlife Protection Act‖ 1972 was
       enacted to provide legal protection to biodiversity.
      In 1988, the ―National Forest Policy‖ was passed, which brought revolutionary changes
       in the conservation and management of biodiversity.
      The Acts and policies in force to protect the environment and biodiversity in India
       include Mining and Mineral Development Regulation Act, 1957; Water (prevention and
       control of pollution) Act, 1974; Forest Conservation Act, 1980; Biological Diversity Act,
       2002; Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers (recognition of rights) Act,
       2006; National Biodiversity Action Plan, 2009; National Environment Policy, 2006 and a
       few more.
In order to fill the gaps existing in the IP Laws and Acts and also to introduce new
guidelines/directions based on the current scenario (socially and politically), each nation keeps
on updating the concerned IP Laws and Acts. Some of the salient amendments made in Indian
Laws and Acts on IPR are mentioned below:
Sl. No     Year                               Historical Proceedings
                                           PATENTS
                          or curative devices.
                         After incorporation of the recommendation submitted by the
  10       1965           committee formed in 1949, a new bill was introduced in Lok Sabha
                          but was not cleared.
                         Again submitted to Parliamentary Committee.
  11       1967
                         1911 Act remained applicable for Designs.
  12       1970          The Patent Act, 1970 passed by the Parliament Committee.
                         The Patent Act, 1970 came into force with the introduction of patent
  13       1972
                          rules.
                         TRIPS Agreement was signed by India and got transition period 1995-
  14       1995
                          2005 to make domestic laws compatible with TRIPS.
                         Introducing the provisions for receiving the applications for the
                          product patent in the field of pharmaceuticals and agro-chemicals
                          (mail box)*.
                         Provisions for the grant of EMRs for distribution and sale of pharma
  15       1999           products on fulfillment of certain conditions.
                         Grant of EMR subject to certain conditions. After the amendments
                          (1999) the product patents related to the pharmaceuticals and
                          agrochemicals were kept on hold for examination till 2005. It is called
                          a mailbox or black box.
                         The uniform 20-year term of the patent for all inventions.
                         Disclosure of source and geographical origin of biological material
  16       2002           made compulsory.
                         Establishment of Appellate Board.
                         Compulsory License provisions strengthened.
  17       2003          The Patents Rules, 2003 were introduced.
                         Product patent for inventions in all fields of technology including
                          food, drug, chemicals and microorganisms.
  18       2005          New forms of known substances excluded in order to prevent the ever-
                          greening of the patent.
                         Introduction of the pre-grant opposition.
PATENTS
      A patent is an exclusive right granted for an innovation that generally provides a new
       way of doing something or offers a new technical solution to a problem.
      The exclusive right legally protects the invention from being copied or reproduced by
       others.
      In return, the invention must be disclosed in an application in a manner sufficiently clear
       and complete to enable it to be replicated by a person with an ordinary level of skill in the
       relevant field.
There is a set criterion, as provided in Section 2(1)(j) of the Patents Act, 1970, which must be
fulfilled for a product or a process to qualify for the grant of a patent. The criterion encompasses:
      Novelty - Not part of ‘State of the Art’. The innovation claimed in the patent application
       is new and not known to anybody in the world. In other words, the innovation is
           o not in the knowledge of the public,
           o not published anywhere through any means of publication and
           o not be claimed in any other specification by any other applicant.
      Inventive step - Not obvious to the person (s) skilled in the art. The innovation is
           o a technical advancement over the existing knowledge,
           o possesses economic significance and,
           o not obvious to a person skilled in the concerned subject.
      Capable of industrial application - For the benefit of society. The invention is capable of
       being made or used in any industry.
      Once an invention has been developed, the inventor has to decide whether to exploit the
       invention for personal benefits as provided by the statutory laws of the country or put it in
       the public domain.
      By and large, the inventor prefers the former option. Only a miniscule of inventions is
       placed in the public domain without claiming any benefits.
      In the latter case, anybody can exploit the innovation for commercial or societal benefit
       without paying any money to the inventor.
      If the owner of an invention wishes to seek monetary gains, he can choose from either of
       the two options, i.e. patenting or Trade Secret. If the inventor is absolutely sure of
       maintaining the secrecy of invention for a very long period (maybe 100 years or more)
       and the probability of reverse engineering of the technology is nil or very low, then the
       ―Trade Secret‖ category is preferred.
      If the invention has a short life span or can be kept secret only for a small period of time
       (a couple of years or so) or the probability of reverse engineering is high once the
       invention is in the public domain, then the ―patent‖ category is preferred.
      As per the Court of Law, a patent owner has the right to decide who may or may not use
       the patented invention.
      In other words, the patent protection provided by the law states that the invention cannot
       be commercially made, used, distributed, imported, or sold by others without the patent
       owner's consent.
      The patent owner may permit other parties to use the invention on mutually agreed terms.
      As a matter of fact, the patent rights are negative rights as the owner is restricting others
       from using the patent in any manner without his prior permission.
      The patent holder may choose to sue the infringing party to stop illegal use of the patent
       and also ask for compensation for the unauthorized use.
      Patents may be granted for inventions/technologies in any field, ranging from a paper clip
       or ballpoint pen to a nanotechnology chip or a Harvard mouse (mouse with cancer
       genes).
      It is a general belief that patents are awarded only to major scientific breakthroughs. But,
       it is not true.
      In fact, the majority of patents are granted to inventions displaying an improvement over
       the existing invention.
      For example, many patents can be awarded to a single molecule e.g. penicillin‘s (an
       antibiotic that kills microbes) and its derivatives. The derivatives are made by making
       subtle changes in the structure of the penicillin resulting in new/improved properties,
       such as acid stability or temperature stability or killing a wide range of microbes (germs).
       The new antibiotic molecules, known as second, third or fourth generation penicillin‘s
       can also be patented.
      In our daily life, we use many patented items, such as toothbrush, toothpaste, shoes, pen,
       eyeglasses, textiles, mobile phones, wrist watch, bicycle, scooter, car, television, cold
       drinks, beverages and many more.
      It is not uncommon that many products contain several inventions (patents) e.g. the
       laptop computer involves hundreds of inventions working together. Similarly, cars,
       mobile phones and televisions have many patented components.
NON-PATENTABLE MATTERS
In the Patent Act, 1970, there are some exclusion (product and processes) that cannot be
patented, such as:
      Invention contrary to public morality - a method for human cloning, a method for
       gambling.
      Mere discovery - finding a new micro-organism occurring freely in nature, laws of
       gravity.
      Mere discovery of a new form of a known substance - use of aspirin for heart
       treatment. Aspirin was patented for reducing fever and mild pains.
      Frivolous invention - dough supplemented with herbs, merely changing the taste of the
       dough, 100 years calendar, and bus timetable.
      Arrangement or rearrangement - an umbrella fitted with a fan, a torch attached to a
       bucket.
      Inventions falling within Section 20(1) of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 - inventions
       relating to compounds of Uranium, Beryllium, Thorium, Plutonium, Radium, Graphite,
       Lithium and more as notified by the Central Government from time to time.
      Literary, dramatic, musical, artistic work - books, sculptures, drawings, paintings,
       computer programmer, mathematical calculations, online chatting method, method of
       teaching, method of learning a language as they are the subject matter of Copyright Act.
       1957.
      Topography of integrated circuits - protection of layout designs of integrated circuits is
       provided separately under the Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Layout Designs Act,
       2000.
      Plants and animals - plants and animals in whole or any part including seeds, varieties
       and species and essentially biological processes for the production or propagation of
       plants and animals are excluded from the scope of protection under patents.
      Traditional knowledge - an invention which in effect is traditional knowledge or which
       is an aggregation or duplication of known properties of traditionally known components
       are also excluded.
PATENT INFRINGEMENTS
      Once the patent is granted to the applicant, he owns the right to use or exploit the
       invention in any capacity. If anyone uses the invention without the prior permission of
       the owner, that act will be considered an infringement of the invention. Infringements can
       be classified into two categories
      Direct Infringement - when a product is substantially close to any patented product or in
       a case where the marketing or commercial use of the invention is carried out without the
       permission of the owner of the invention.
      Indirect Infringement - When some amount of deceit or accidental infringement
       happens without any intention of infringement. If such an unlawful act has been
       committed, the patentee holds the right to sue the infringer through judicial intervention.
       Every country has certain laws to deal with such unlawful acts. Following reliefs are
       made available to the patentee:
           o Interlocutory/interim injunction.
           o Damages or accounts of profits.
           o Permanent injunction
      Generally, an invention that has been either published or publicly displayed cannot be
       patented, as the claimed invention will lose the Novelty ‗criterion.
      However, under certain circumstances, the Patents Act provides a grace period of 12
       months for filing a patent application from the date of its publication in a journal or
       presentation in a reputed scientific society or exhibition.
      Sometimes, disclosure of an invention before filing a patent application is unavoidable,
       e.g. selling your invention to a potential investor or a business partner who would like to
       know complete details of the invention in order to judge its commercial value. In such a
       case, it is advisable to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) or any other confidential
       agreement to safeguards your interest
PROCESS OF PATENTING
      In India, the process of grant of a patent is a lengthy procedure that may take anywhere 3-
       4 years or more. The major steps involved in this process are listed in figure
      While the process of patenting includes – Prior art search, Choice of Application to be
       Filed, Patent Application Forms, Jurisdiction of Filing Patent Application, Publication,
       Pre-grant Opposition, Examination, Grant of a Patent, Validity of Patent Protection, Post-
       grant Opposition
      Before an inventor embarks upon the patent filing process, he has to ensure that his
       invention is novel as per the criterion for the grant of a patent. For this, he/she has to
       check whether or not his invention already exists in the public domain.
      For this, he/she needs to read patent documents and Non-Patent Literature (NPL),
       scientific journals/reports/magazines, etc.
      The information lying in the public domain in any form, either before the filing of the
       patent application or the priority date of the patent application claiming the invention, is
       termed as Prior Art.
      Conducting a prior art search before filing the patent has advantages as it averts
       infringement, tracks research and development and provides access to detailed
       information on the invention.
      The prior art search is carried out on the parameters such as novelty, patentability, state
       of the art, infringement, validity and freedom to operate.
      The commonly used databases for prior art search fall in two categories i.e. Patents
       Databases and NPL. The patent databases are
           o Indian             Patent         Advanced         Search      System        (InPASS-
                http://ipindiaservices.gov.in/publicsearch/).
           o Patentscope (WIPO- https://www.wipo.int/patentscope/en/).
           o Espacenet (EU- https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/).
           o USPTO (USA- https://www.uspto.gov/).
           o Google Patents Advanced Search (https://patents.google.com/advanced).
           o Orbit Intelligence (https://www.questel.com/business-intelligence-software/orbit-
                intelligence/).
           o Derwent              Innovation       (https://clarivate.com/derwent/solutions/derwent-
                innovation/).
           o PROQUEST (https://about.proquest.com/search/?searchKeyword=patent+).
      Non-Patent Literature (NPL)
           o Scholarly       publications:   Handbooks,      Textbooks,     Withdrawn,     Patents,
                Encyclopedias, Journals (IEEE, Research Gate, Springer, Wiley Online Library,
                etc.), Dissertations, NCBI‗s, PubMed, Conference Proceedings, Technical
                Reports, Public Conferences, etc.
           o Industry/trade publications: Industry reviews and public disclosures (Social
                media, YouTube, Books, Magazines, Datasheets, Blueprints, etc.).
           o Others: Newspapers, Websites, Technology blogs, Researchers websites, etc.
           o Although, majority of NPL data is available freely on the public forum, some of
                the journals are paid and can be accessed after paying the subscription.
           o Major Patent Office‘s such as the United States Patent and Trademark Office's
                (USPTO), European Patent Office (EPO), Japan Patent Office (JPO), etc. are
                maintaining in house NPL databases to make patents examination more effective
Once a decision has been made to patent the invention, the next step is, what kind of application
needs to be filed i.e. provisional patent application or complete (Final) patent application -
generally, the provisional patent application is preferred for the following reasons:
      As per the Patent Act, 1970 (Section 39) and the Patents Rules, 2003 (Rule 7, 54, 135 and
       sub rule (1) of rule 20, the application for the grant of patent is filed using Form-1 and
       Form-2.
      The information sought in Form-1 is general in nature i.e. Title of Application, Names of
       Applicant(s) and Inventor(s), Type of Application (Ordinary, Convention, PCT-NP
       (PCT- National Phase), Divisional, Patent of Addition, etc.).
      Whereas Form-2 seeks technical information and whether to file the provisional
       application or complete the application. For Provisional Application, only Description of
       the Invention and the Abstract is to be furnished. Whereas, Complete Application
       requires Description of the Invention, Abstract, Claims and the manner in which
       invention have to be performed.
      The Claims of the patent are a very crucial part of the specifications because they define
       the actual boundary of the invention.
      Claims specify what is actually claimed by the invention and what is being sought to be
       protected. It clearly describes what the patent does and does not cover
PUBLICATION
          Once the patent application has been filed at the Regional Patent Office, the patent
           application is kept secret for 18 months in the Patent Office.
          After the expiry of 18 months (from the date of filing of the application or the priority
           claimed date, whichever is earlier), the application is published in the Official Journal
           of Patent Office (http://www.ipindia.nic.in/journalpatents.html).
          The purpose of publishing the application is to inform the public about the invention.
           The publication of an application is a mandatory step.
PRE-GRANT OPPOSITION
      If anybody has an objection to the invention claimed in the patent application, he/she can
       challenge the application by approaching the Controller of Patents within 6 months from
       the date of publication. It is termed as Pre-grant Opposition.
      Depending on the outcome of the case, the patent application may be rejected or
       recommended for the next step, i.e. patent examination.
      Although the patent application is kept secret for 18 months, but under special
       circumstances, this period can be reduced when the patentee/applicant plans to sell or
       license the patent or seek an investor).
      For this, the applicant has to fill a Form-9 and submit it to the Controller General.
EXAMINATION
      Patent examination is a critical step in the process of grant of a patent. All the important
       criteria (novel, inventive step, etc.) are scrutinized by the professionals depending on the
       content of the invention.
      Usually, the examiner raises certain queries/doubts which need to be addressed by the
       inventors. Once the examiner is satisfied with the answers received from the inventors,
       the application is recommended for the grant of a patent.
      It is pertinent to mention that a patent application is not examined automatically after
       clearing the publication stage. The applicant or his representative has to make a request
       for examination of the patent by filing Form-18A and submitting the same within 48
       months from the date of filing of the application
GRANT OF PATENT
      After fulfilling all the requirements for the grant of a patent, including all
       objections/queries raised by the Patent Examiner and the public at large, the patent is
       granted to the applicant.
      The granted patent is published in the Official Journal of the Patent Office.
      This journal is published every Friday and contains information related to patent
       applications published under section (u/s) 11A, post-grant publication, restoration of
       patent, notifications, list of non-working patents and public notices issued by the Patent
       Office.
      The patent protection is granted to an applicant for a limited period, generally 20 years,
       starting from the date of filing of the application.
      Once a patent is granted for an invention in India, the next vital step is to ensure that it is
       renewed annually by paying Patent Renewal Fee as per Section 53, Rule 80 of the Indian
       Patents Act, till the expiry of the patent grant period.
      Non-payment of Patent Renewal Fee might result in the cancellation of the patent.
      In some countries, patent protection may be extended beyond 20 years.
      The extension aims to compensate for the time expended on the administrative approval
       procedure before products can be put on the market. The time taken for this procedure
       means that the patent owner may sometimes not be able to benefit from his right for a
       considerable period after the grant of the patent.
      Once the patent has been granted by the Patent Office, it still can be challenged by
       anyone within one year from the date of publication of the grant of the patent.
      The granted patent can be challenged either via a Patent Office or in a Court of Law.
      These bodies may invalidate or revoke a patent upon a successful challenge by the
       interested party on the grounds mentioned below:
           o The applicant for the patent wrongfully obtained the invention or any part of the
                invention.
           o The invention claimed has been published before the priority date.
           o The invention claimed was publicly known / used before the priority date.
           o The invention claimed is obvious and does not involve an inventive step.
           o The subject of the claim is not patentable as per Chapter II of the Patent Act,
                1970.
           o The details/specifications of the invention do not sufficiently and clearly describe
                the invention.
COMMERCIALIZATION OF A PATENT
      In an Exclusive License, the patent is sold to only one individual/organization for a fixed
       time period. During this time period, no other person or entity can exploit the relevant IP
       except the named licensee.
      In Non-Exclusive License, a patentee can sell his patent rights to as many
       individuals/parties as he likes. If the patentee is not able to commercialize his patent
       within three years from the date of the grant of a patent, any person may submit an
       application to the Controller of Patents for grant of Compulsory Licensing (of the patent),
       subject to the fulfillment of following conditions:
           o Reasonable requirements of the public concerning the patented invention have not
                been satisfied.
           o The patented invention is not available to the public at a reasonable price.
           o The patented invention is not worked in the territory of India.
      In general, applicants can prepare their patent applications and file them without
       assistance from a patent attorney.
      However, given the complexity of patent documents, it is advisable to seek legal
       assistance from a patent attorney/agent when drafting a patent application.
      Furthermore, the legislation of many countries requires that an applicant, whose ordinary
       residence or principal place of business is outside the country, be represented by an
       attorney or agent qualified in the country (which usually means an agent or attorney who
       resides and practices in that country
      There is no such term as Universal Patent or World Patent or International Patent as the
       patent rights are territorial.
      An application for a patent must be filed with a Patent Office of the country in which one
       wishes to seek patent protection. Unfortunately, this option becomes laborious,
       cumbersome, time consuming and expensive if one wishes to file a patent application in
       many countries.
      To ease out this issue, many Regional Offices have been established which receive patent
       applications on behalf of a group of nations e.g. European Patent Office and African
       Regional Intellectual Property Organization.
      A single application is sufficient to cover many nations that are members of a particular
       regional office/organization.
      However, if one wishes to seek patent protection in several countries worldwide, it is
       preferred to file an international patent under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).
      The only condition is that the applicant‗s country should be a member of PCT. India,
       along with over 190 nations, is a member of PCT.
      Yes, in general, Indian residents are required to file the patent application first in India.
       Subsequently, they may file for patent protection in other countries.
      But for this, prior approval is needed from the Patent Office. However, this approval can
       be waived off under the following circumstances:
           o The applicant is not an Indian resident.
           o If 6 weeks have expired since the patent application was filed in India by an
                Indian resident.
           o If two or more inventors are working on an invention in a foreign country and one
                of the inventors is an Indian resident. The invention does not have a potential
                market in India and hence does not wish to file the patent in India. In such a
                scenario, the Indian resident has to seek Foreign Filing Permission (FFP) from an
                Indian Patent Office.
           o In case of international collaboration, if one part of the invention originated in
                India and the inventor is an Indian resident, he has to seek permission to file the
                patent outside India.
           o If the invention is related to defense or atomic energy or utility model, the
                inventor/s needs to seek permission from the Indian Patent Office because
                inventions related to these domains are not the subject matter of patentability in
                India.
 There are over 30 patent-related forms. Some of them are mentioned below.
FEES STRUCTURE
      As per the patent Act, 1970 and The Patents Rules (1972), the requisite fee has been
       specified based on the type of form/s to be submitted to the Office.
      Electronically filed applications are 10% cheaper than physical filing.
      Provisional Application - A patent application filed when the invention is not fully
       finalized and some part of the invention is still under experimentation. Such type of
       application helps to obtain the priority date for the invention.
      Ordinary Application - A patent application filed with complete specifications and
       claims but without claiming any priority date.
      PCT Application - An international application filed in accordance with PCT. A single
       application can be filed to seek patent protection and claim priority in all the member
       countries of PCT.
      Divisional Application - When an application claims more than one invention, the
       applicant on his own or to meet the official objection on the ground of plurality may
         divide the application and file two or more applications. This application divided out of
         the parent one is known as a Divisional Application.
        Patent of Addition Application - When an invention is a slight modification of the
         earlier invention for which the patentee has already applied for or has obtained a patent,
         the applicant can go for Patent of Addition, if the modification in the invention is new.
         Benefit - There is no need to pay a separate renewal fee for the Patent of Addition, during
         the term of the main patent. It expires along with the main patent.
        Convention Application - If a patent application has been filed in the Indian Patent
         Office and the applicant wishes to file the same invention in the one or more Convention
         countries (e.g. Paris Convention) by claiming the same priority date on which application
         was filed in India, such an application is known as Convention Application. The
         applicant has to file Convention Application within 12 months from the date of filing in
         India to claim the same priority date.
       and continuing basis was highlighted in the Government of India‗s Technology Policy
       Statement (TPS) of 1983. Therefore in 1985, TIFAC was established as an autonomous
       body, registered as a Society in 1988, under the Department of Science and Technology.
       It is an important cog in filling a critical gap in the overall Science and Technology
       system of India. Its mission is to assess the state-of-art of technologies and set directions
       for future technological developments in India in important socio-economic sectors
      National Research Development Corporation (NRDC) - NRDC, an enterprise of
       Department of Scientific & Industrial Research (DSIR), Govt. of India, was set up in
       1953 with a mandate to develop, promote and transfer/commercialize IP and technologies
       emanating      from         Higher   Education    Institutes    (HEIs),     R&D       research
       laboratories/institutions and Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs). NRDC has a repository
       of 2500 Indian technologies, filed over 1700 Patents and transferred about 5000
       technologies in different sectors in India. It has also created a technology data bank
       (http://fccollc.com/nrdclive/) containing information regarding technologies available in
       various fields, such as electrical & electronics, mechanical, coil, mining, biotechnology,
       healthcare, leather, etc.
UTILITY MODELS
      In many cases, a new invention involves an incremental improvement over the existing
       products, but this technical improvement is not sufficient enough to pass the stringent
       criterion of Novelty and Non-obviousness set aside for the grant of a patent. Such small
       innovations can still be legally protected in some countries and termed as ‗Utility
       Models‘ or ‗Petty Patents‘ or ‗Innovation Patents‘.
      In this case, the criterion of Novelty and Non-obviousness are diluted or relinquished.
       But the requirement of industrial application or utility is the same as that for patents.
      Utility Model is a helpful tool for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) since
       the grant of a Utility Model is usually less rigorous and involves minimal cost.
      MSMEs do not have deep pockets to carry out intensive R&D leading to the grant of
       patents. But their innovations are good enough for improving their products/processes
       and bringing more financial rewards. Such inventions pass the requirements set aside for
       Utility Models but not for patents.
      The life of the Utility Model is less as compared to the patents. It varies from 7-15 years
       in different countries.
      Nearly 80 countries, including France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, China, Finland,
       Russian Federation and Spain, provide protection for Utility Models under their IPR
       laws.
      India till date does not recognize utility patents. If these small patents are recognized
       under IP protection in India, it will catapult the number of patents (filed and granted) on
       annual basis.