Cioncolini 2012
Cioncolini 2012
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:                                       A new method to predict the entrained liquid fraction in annular two-phase flow is presented. The under-
Received 1 March 2011                                  lying experimental database contains 2460 data points collected from 38 different literature studies for
Received in revised form 8 November 2011               8 different gas–liquid or vapor–liquid combinations (R12, R113, water–steam, water–air, genklene–air,
Accepted 9 November 2011
                                                       ethanol–air, water–helium, silicon–air), tube diameters from 5.0 mm to 95.3 mm, pressures from 0.1 to
                                                       20.0 MPa and covers both adiabatic and evaporating flow conditions, circular and non-circular channels
Keywords:
                                                       and vertical upflow, vertical downflow and horizontal flow conditions. Annular flows are regarded here
Annular two-phase flow
                                                       as a special form of a liquid atomization process, where a high velocity confined spray, composed by the
Entrained liquid fraction
Liquid film atomization
                                                       gas phase and entrained liquid droplets, flows in the center of the channel dragging and atomizing the
Shear-driven liquid film                                annular liquid film that streams along the channel wall. Correspondingly, the liquid film flow is assumed
Entrainment                                            to be shear-driven and the energy required to drive the liquid atomization is assumed to be provided in
Deposition                                             the form of kinetic energy of the droplet-laden gas core flow, so that the liquid film–gas core aerody-
                                                       namic interaction is ultimately assumed to control the liquid disintegration process. As such, the new
                                                       prediction method is based on the core flow Weber number, representing the ratio of the disrupting
                                                       aerodynamic force to the surface tension retaining force, a single and physically plausible dimensionless
                                                       group. The new prediction method is explicit, fully stand-alone and reproduces the available data better
                                                       than existing empirical correlations, including in particular measurements carried out in evaporating
                                                       flow conditions of relevance for boiling water nuclear reactor cooling.
                                                                                                                         © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction                                                                          micro evaporators and micro heat sinks for the thermal man-
                                                                                         agement of microelectronic components, computer chips, laser
   Annular two-phase flow is one of the most frequently observed                          diodes and high energy physics particle detectors, while also for
flow regimes in practical applications involving gas–liquid and                           refrigeration, air-conditioning and petrochemical piping and pro-
vapor–liquid two-phase flows, such as steam generators, refrigera-                        cesses.
tion and air conditioning systems, nuclear reactors and chemical                             A crucial parameter for predicting and modeling annular flows is
processing plants. In annular flows, a part of the liquid phase                           the entrained liquid fraction e, defined as the ratio of the entrained
flows as a continuous film that streams along the channel wall,                            liquid droplets mass flow rate to the total liquid mass flow rate. The
while the rest of the liquid phase is transported in the gas core as                     entrained liquid fraction is a flow parameter bounded between 0
entrained droplets. Annular flows have been extensively investi-                          and 1, with values close to 0 being characteristic of annular flows
gated in the last decades, particularly in connection with nuclear                       with an almost perfect segregation between liquid and vapor and
reactor cooling applications. Nonetheless, this topic is currently                       most of the liquid concentrated in the film, while values close to 1
experiencing a renewed interest, driven in particular by nuclear                         are typical of annular flows close to the transition to dispersed mist
reactor power uprates and nuclear reactor fuel optimization, appli-                      flow where most of the liquid is in the form of entrained droplets.
cations where more accurate and reliable prediction methods                              The accurate prediction of the entrained liquid droplets mass flow
for system computer codes are required. Sound prediction meth-                           rate is of paramount importance since this is liquid not flowing in
ods for annular flows are as well required for the design of                              the annular film, and hence has an important influence both on
                                                                                         the gas/vapor core and annular film flows. As a matter of fact, an
                                                                                         accurate knowledge of the entrained liquid fraction is required in
                                                                                         most thermal–hydraulics predictions, such as the onset of dryout
   ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +41 21 693 5981; fax: +41 21 693 5960.
                                                                                         in boiling channels, post-dryout heat transfer and the effectiveness
     E-mail addresses: andrea.cioncolini@epfl.ch (A. Cioncolini), john.thome@epfl.ch
(J.R. Thome).                                                                            of nuclear reactor core cooling, particularly during transient and
   1
     Tel.: +41 21 693 5984; fax: +41 21 693 5960.                                        accident scenarios.
0029-5493/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.11.014
                                                                  A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213                               201
                                                                                                           at the same speed, then the droplet-laden gas core density c , the
  Nomenclature                                                                                             core flow velocity Vc and equivalent diameter dc are as follows:
                                                            1
                               Entrained Liquid Fraction
0.8
0.4
0.2
                                                            0 1                       2                       3                       4                         5
                                                            10                   10                      10                      10                        10
                                                                                          Core Flow Weber Number
                        Fig. 1. Entrained liquid fraction vs. core flow Weber number as defined in Eq. (1), from Cioncolini and Thome (2010).
202                                              A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213
Table 1
Experimental annular flow data bank for vertical flow in circular tubes.
Reference Fluids d (mm) P (MPa) G (kg m−2 s−1 ) x e (1) (2) (3) No. points
 Lopez de Bertodano et al. (2001)       R113                           10.0       0.32–0.53     205–1089         0.35–0.90       0.18–0.89   350       ↑     a      48
 Han et al. (2007)                      H2 O–Air                        9.52      0.10          181–344          0.10–0.27       0.02–0.07   166       ↑     a      30
 Okawa et al. (2005)                    H2 O–Air                        5.00      0.14–0.76     265–1939         0.05–0.78       0.05–0.69   320       ↑     a     170
 Sawant et al. (2008)                   H2 O–Air                        9.40      0.12–0.40     115–890          0.06–0.91       0.02–0.75   210       ↑     a      66
 Jepson et al. (1989)                   H2 O–Air       H2 O–He         10.3       0.15           55–219          0.07–0.75       0.01–0.26   292       ↑     a      49
 Nakazatomi and Sekoguchi (1996a)       H2 O–Air                       19.2       0.30–20.0      87–3350         0.06–0.99       0.01–0.99   474       ↑     a     203
 Azzopardi and Zaidi (2000)             H2 O–Air                       38.0       0.15           47–154          0.21–0.73       0.13–0.50   118       ↑     a      28
 Schadel                                                               25.4       0.15           51–312          0.35–0.91       0.10–0.76   150       ↑     a      64
 et al.                                 H2 O–Air                       42.0
 (1990)                                                                57.1
 Jagota et al. (1973)                   H2 O–Air                       25.4       0.28–0.42     135–591          0.12–0.69       0.06–0.56   150–261   ↑     a     103
 Mayinger and Langner (1976)            R12                            14.0       1.10          300–1000         0.30–0.90       0.06–0.94   na        ↑     d      17
 Hinkle (1967)                          H2 O–Air                       12.6       0.28–0.62     155–733          0.15–0.71       0.01–0.45   119–262   ↑     a     129
 Andreussi (1983)                       H2 O–Air                       24.0       0.15           76–523          0.09–0.84       0.13–0.62   208       ↓     a      66
 Steen and Wallis (1964)                H2 O–Air   Silicon–air         15.9       0.10–0.41      48–462          0.04–0.73       0.01–0.98   na        ↓     a     251
 Adamsson and Anglart (2006)            H2 O–Steam                     14.0       7.0           750–1750         0.29–0.76       0.55–0.96   na        ↑     d     153
 Ueda and Kim (1982)                    R113                           10.0       0.33          486–1155         0.26–0.71       0.29–0.95   na        ↑     d      27
 Al-Yarubi and Lucas (2008)             H2 O–Air                       50.0       0.12           67–158          0.15–0.46       0.07–0.14   na        ↑     a      15
 Würtz (1978)                           H2 O–Steam                     10.0       3.0–9.0       500–3000         0.08–0.80       0.11–0.92   450–900   ↑     ad    180
                                                                       20.0
 Assad et al. (1998)                    H2 O–Air                        9.50      0.37          128–757          0.22–0.85       0.04–0.80   440       ↑     a      31
 Whalley et al. (1974)                  H2 O–Air    Genklene–Air       31.8       0.12–0.35      78–789          0.10–0.90       0.15–0.97   590       ↑     a     158
 Gill et al. (1964, 1969)               H2 O–Air                       31.8       0.10–0.34      20–245          0.14–0.88       0.03–0.70   167–520   ↑     a      48
 Brown (1978)                           H2 O–Air                       31.8       0.17–0.31     158–316          0.33–0.66       0.42–0.86   420       ↑     a      30
 Cousins et al. (1965) and Cousins                                      9.53      0.14–0.41     106–475          0.15–0.81       0.03–0.65   230–480   ↑     a     123
                                        H2 O–Air
 and Hewitt (1968a,b)                                                  31.8
                                        H2 O–Air                        6.00      0.23–0.86     111–1290         0.03–0.90       0.02–0.87   na        ↑     a     102
 Minh and Huyghe (1965)
                                        Ethanol–Air                    12.0
 Hewitt and Pulling (1969)              H2 O–Steam                      9.30      0.24–0.45     295–299          0.14–0.75       0.01–0.68   390       ↑     a     72
 Keeys et al. (1970)                    H2 O–Steam                     12.6       3.5–6.9      1308–2765         0.25–0.68       0.65–0.86   290       ↑     a     18
 Singh et al. (1969)                    H2 O–Steam                     12.5       6.9–8.3       517–4242         0.11–0.93       0.13–0.82   180       ↑     a     39
 Nigmatulin et al. (1977)               H2 O–Steam                     13.3       1.0–10.0      500–4000         0.10–0.90       0.07–0.98   300       ↑     a     45
 Milashenko et al. (1989)               H2 O–Steam                     13.1       7.0          1000–3000         0.06–0.42       0.35–0.93   na        ↑     d     28
(1) – Dimensionless distance L/d of test section inlet from mixer (2 component flows) or preheater (saturated flows) (for adiabatic tests only).
(2) – Flow direction: ↑, vertical upflow; ↓, vertical downflow.
(3) – Type of test: a, adiabatic; d, diabatic.
Cioncolini and Thome (2010) and now contains 2293 data points,                              expanded and now includes 2293 measurements of the entrained
taken in vertical circular tubes under both adiabatic and evaporat-                         liquid fraction collected from 31 different literature studies.
ing flow conditions, including now measurements carried out in                               The collected data cover 8 different gas–liquid or vapor–liquid
evaporative channels of relevance for boiling water nuclear reactor                         combinations (both single-component saturated fluids such as
applications. Additionally, 71 data points for non-circular chan-                           water–steam and refrigerants R12 and R113 and two-component
nels (annulus and rod bundle) and 96 data points for horizontal                             fluids, such as water–air, genklene–air, ethanol–air, water–helium,
and inclined circular tubes are also included in the databank. The                          silicon–air) and 24 different values of the tube diameter in the
new, improved prediction method proposed here is still based on                             range of 5.0 mm to 57.1 mm. The experimental database now
the core flow Weber number, a single and physically plausible                                includes additional measurements carried out in evaporating flow
dimensionless group, and reproduces the available data better than                          conditions with both water–steam (Würtz, 1978; Milashenko
existing empirical correlations. Besides, being explicit and fully                          et al., 1989; Adamsson and Anglart, 2006) and refrigerants R12
stand-alone, this new method is much simpler to use than the orig-                          (Mayinger and Langner, 1976) and R113 (Ueda and Kim, 1982).
inal one proposed by the authors and can be easily implemented                              In particular, Adamsson and Anglart (2006) performed their
into existing thermal–hydraulic system codes and simulation tools.                          measurements using different axial power distributions (uniform,
Such an explicit method is particularly useful for simplifying cal-                         inlet-peaked, middle-peaked and outlet-peaked) at conditions
culations during the optimization of thermal systems and eventual                           typical of boiling water nuclear reactors (pressure of 7.0 MPa, mass
flow stability analysis. This new method is part of a unified annu-                           flux of 750–1750 kg m−2 s−1 and tube diameter of 14.0 mm). As
lar flow modeling suite that is currently being developed by the                             can be seen in Table 1, most of the data refer to vertical upflow, but
authors that also includes methods to predict the axial frictional                          some data taken in vertical downflow are also included. Adiabatic,
and total pressure gradient, the convective boiling heat transfer                           two-component annular flows can be quite slow in approaching
coefficient, the annular liquid film thickness and the liquid film and                         fully developed flow conditions and losing any memory effect of the
gas core velocity profiles (Cioncolini et al., 2009a,b; Cioncolini and                       mixing device (Wolf et al., 2001). As can be seen in Table 1, however,
Thome, 2010, 2011).                                                                         most of the adiabatic test rigs have been designed with calming
                                                                                            sections long enough to significantly damp out any dependence on
                                                                                            inlet conditions. As such, inlet effects in adiabatic two-component
2. Experimental database description                                                        flows are not taken into account in the present study.
                                                                                                As can be seen in Table 1, 73.0% of the collected data are for adi-
   The main details regarding the extended experimental annular                             abatic upflow, while 13.8% are for adiabatic downflow and 13.2%
flow databank for vertical flow in circular tubes are summarized in                           cover evaporating upflow conditions, so that the databank is biased
Table 1, while a selection of histograms that further describes the                         towards adiabatic upflow conditions. Besides, as can be seen in
collected data is shown in Fig. 2. The database has been significantly                       Fig. 2, most of the data were taken at operating pressures close to
                                                                               A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213                                                                                         203
600 2000
                          500
                                                                                                                                                   1500
                          400
300 1000
                          200
                                                                                                                                                         500
                          100
                            0                                                                                                                              0
                                0          10             20              30                  40              50          60                                   0    2          4      6        8       10       12    14      16          18    20
                                                         Tube Diameter [mm]                                                                                                                  Pressure [MPa]
                          700                                                                                                                            200
  Number of Data Points
                          400
                                                                                                                                                         100
                          300
                          200
                                                                                                                                                          50
                          100
                            0                                                                                                                              0
                                0    500        1000     1500      2000        2500           3000     3500        4000   4500                                 0   0.1         0.2    0.3      0.4     0.5      0.6   0.7     0.8         0.9    1
                                                                                      2
                                                          Mass Flux [kg/m s]                                                                                                                 Vapor Quality
                          500                                                                                                                            400
                                                                                                                                 Number of Data Points
  Number of Data Points
                          400
                                                                                                                                                         300
                          300
                                                                                                                                                         200
                          200
                                                                                                                                                         100
                          100
                            0                                                                                                                              0
                             0.5    0.55    0.6        0.65     0.7   0.75        0.8           0.85       0.9     0.95    1                                0.5    0.55        0.6   0.65      0.7     0.75     0.8   0.85    0.9     0.95       1
                                                         Void Fraction (W&G)                                                                                                               Void Fraction (DIX)
200
                          100
                                                                                                                                                         150
                                                                                                                                                         100
                           50
                                                                                                                                                          50
                            0                                                                                                                              0
                                0      1           2           3          4               5            6           7       8                                   0        0.05         0.1        0.15          0.2      0.25         0.3         0.35
                                                              Eq.(4) Left-Hand                                                                                                               Mach Number
atmospheric and at low mass fluxes. As such, additional entrained                                                                 Fig. 2 are predicted according to Woldesemayat and Ghajar (2007)
liquid fraction measurements appear more than welcome, partic-                                                                   and to the Dix model (Chexal et al., 1986), labeled W&G and DIX in
ularly at high operating pressures, high mass fluxes and under                                                                    Fig. 2, respectively.
evaporating flow conditions.                                                                                                          Typically, the predominant mode of liquid entrainment in ver-
    As noted by Levy (1999), the transition from intermittent to                                                                 tical annular flow is the shearing off of the crests of the disturbance
annular flow typically corresponds to a cross sectional void frac-                                                                waves that slide on top of the liquid film. If the hydrodynamic con-
tion between 0.7 and 0.8. As can be seen in Fig. 2, the vast majority                                                            ditions are appropriate, however, other entrainment mechanisms
of the data collected in Table 1 correspond to a local void fraction                                                             may come into play (Hewitt and Hall-Taylor, 1970), such as wave
above 0.8. As such, the contamination of the data from intermittent                                                              undercutting. In this latter case, a disturbance wave is deformed
flow can be expected to be minimal, and is therefore neglected in                                                                 into a liquid ligament by the pulling action of gravity and then the
the present study. In particular, the void fraction values included in                                                           ligament protrudes into the gas core where it is finally atomized.
204                                                   A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213
Table 2
Additional annular flow data for non-circular channels and non-vertical flows.
Reference Fluids d (mm) P (MPa) G (kg m−2 s−1 ) x e (1) (2) (3) No. points
(1) – Dimensionless distance L/d of test section inlet from mixer (2 component flows) or preheater (saturated flows) (for adiabatic tests only).
(2) – Flow direction: ↑, vertical upflow; →, horizontal.
(3) – Type of test: a, adiabatic; d, diabatic.
  a                                  −1
    Hydraulic diameter (4 Aflow Pwet    ).
As such, wave undercutting can be expected to play a role in the                               et al. (2002) used water–air at low pressure in a vertical channel
entrainment process whenever gravity affects the flow. A prelimi-                               designed to mimic the four subchannels among ten fuel rods in a
nary and qualitative check of the influence that gravity may exert                              light water nuclear reactor bundle, with and without spacer grids.
on the flow can be obtained by extrapolating a criterion proposed                               The other data collected in Table 2 (Williams et al., 1996; Dallman
by Wallis (1961) for predicting flow reversal, the condition at which                           et al., 1984; Paras and Karabelas, 1991; Ousaka and Kariyasaki,
in an initially cocurrent annular upflow some of the liquid in the                              1992; Geraci et al., 2007) cover low pressure air–water flows in
film starts flowing downward under the pull of gravity. This flow                                 horizontal circular tubes, covering diameter values from 25.4 mm
reversal condition reads as follows:                                                           to 95.3 mm. Geraci et al. (2007), in particular, tested channel incli-
∗           ∗                                                                                nations of 0◦ , 20◦ , 45◦ , 70◦ and 85◦ with respect to the horizontal.
      Jl +       Jg < 1 ⇒ Flow reversal                                              (4)
                                                                                                  It is worth highlighting that the new prediction method that
where the non-dimensional average volumetric fluxes of liquid Jl∗                               will be described in Section 3 is based on the vertical tubular data
and vapor Jg∗ are:                                                                             of Table 1. The additional data collected in Table 2 will then be
                                                                                             used to extend the applicability of the new prediction method to
                     l                           g                                           non-circular and non-vertical channels.
Jl∗   = Jl                   ; J ∗ = Jg                                              (5)
                 gd(l − g ) g               gd(l − g )
where g is the acceleration of gravity and the superficial velocities                           3. New prediction method
of liquid Jl and vapor Jg are:
                                                                                                   In the new prediction method, the core flow Weber number
        (1 − x)G                   xG                                                          is simplified with respect to the original formulation in Eq. (1) as
Jl =             ;          Jg =                                                     (6)
           l                      g                                                          follows:
   As shown in Fig. 2, the influence of gravity on the flow should be                                       c Jg2 d
negligible for the vast majority of the data, so that shear-induced                            Wec =                                                                (8)
                                                                                                            
liquid atomization can be regarded as the dominant entrainment
mechanism. It is worth noting that the histogram in Fig. 2 showing                             where the core flow density c is calculated as indicated in Eq. (2),
the left-hand of Eq. (4) is limited to upflow data from Table 1.                                while the core flow velocity Vc and core equivalent diameter dc are
   In order to check the relevance of compressibility effects in the                           approximated with the superficial gas velocity Jg and tube diame-
flow the following form of the Mach number M is used:                                           ter d, respectively. Within the limits of the present study, both the
         Vtpf         Vg                                                                       superficial gas velocity and the tube diameter provide reasonably
                            xG
M=                ≈      =                                                           (7)       good approximations to the core flow velocity and core equiva-
         atpf         ag   g εag
                                                                                               lent diameter, so that the simplified form of the core flow Weber
where Vtpf and atpf are the average velocity and the sonic velocity for                        number in Eq. (8) is on average within about 15% of the original
the two-phase flow. As can be seen in Eq. (7), the average two-phase                            formulation in Eq. (1) and can therefore be expected to still cap-
velocity is approximated with the gas velocity Vg calculated in a                              ture the essence of the liquid film atomization process. The great
segregated-phase approximation, which provides a slight upper-                                 advantage of this new core flow Weber number, with respect to the
bound to the average core velocity for a cocurrent annular flow.                                original formulation, is that the dependence on the void fraction ε
The sonic two-phase velocity, on the other hand, is approximated                               is removed, so that a completely stand-alone prediction method for
in Eq. (7) with the gas sonic velocity ag , which provides a lower-                            the entrained liquid fraction can now be designed.
bound to the sonic velocity of a high void fraction two-phase flow                                  The measured entrained liquid fraction values from Table 1 are
(Tong and Weisman, 1996). As such, Mach number values predicted                                displayed in Fig. 3 versus the core flow Weber number as defined
with Eq. (7) can be expected to be slightly conservative, i.e. approx-                         in Eq. (8). Notwithstanding a significant scatter, the majority of the
imate the ‘true’ Mach number from above. As can be seen in Fig. 2,                             data points can be seen to cluster reasonably well on a sigmoid
almost all data points in Table 1 have a predicted local Mach num-                             trend. It is worth emphasizing that measuring the entrained liq-
ber value below 0.3. Assuming that this same threshold normally                                uid fraction is very challenging, and all the measuring techniques
used in single-phase incompressible flow applications is applica-                               proposed and used so far are quite invasive and may significantly
ble for annular flows as well, compressibility effects can then be                              perturb the annular flow that is being investigated. As such, some
neglected.                                                                                     scatter in the measurements is to a good extent unavoidable, par-
    The main details regarding the additional annular flow data for                             ticularly when merging data from different studies. Moreover, it
non-circular cross sections and channel inclination other that verti-                          can be noticed in Fig. 3 that the scatter tends to be higher for
cal are summarized in Table 2. In particular, Würtz (1978) measured                            lower entrained liquid fraction values. This can be justified con-
the entrained liquid fraction in a vertical annulus with water–steam                           sidering that the two most frequently used measuring techniques
in both adiabatic and evaporating flow conditions, while Feldhaus                               for the entrained liquid fraction, namely the liquid film suction
                                                                   A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213                              205
0.8
0.4
0.2
                                                           0 1                          2                      3                       4                            5
                                                           10                      10                     10                      10                           10
                                                                                            Core Flow Weber Number
Fig. 3. Entrained liquid fraction data of Table 1 vs. core flow Weber number as defined in Eq. (8).
and the core flow sampling, both become progressively less accu-                                             data. Here, in particular, a robust fitting technique and a simple
rate in the limit e → 0+ . From a fluid dynamics point of view, this                                         model-based outlier detection algorithm (Pearson, 2005) are used
limit corresponds to the so called ideal annular flows, character-                                           to provide a correlation between e and Wec . First, a preliminary
ized by an almost perfect segregation between the phases. Since                                             fitting equation is derived using the entire databank (i.e. outliers
these conditions are rarely encountered in practice, the high scat-                                         included). Since the bulk of the data in Fig. 3 is clustered on a
ter in the data in the limit e → 0+ can be considered not critical                                          sigmoid trend, a generalized logistic function (Jukić and Scitovski,
for practical applications. Experimental observations generated in                                          1996) is selected for use here among the several ‘S’ shaped fitting
fields as diverse as biology, demography, economics, chemistry and                                           functions available, which for a target variable bounded between 0
medicine frequently collapse on sigmoid trends. These trends are                                            and 1 as e in the present case reads as:
typical of dynamic systems characterized by a positive feedback in                                                              −1/g
their early evolution, which gives rise to an exponential growth,                                           e = (1 + be−cgx )          ;       b, c, g > 0                    (9)
followed by a negative feedback that dampens the initially expo-                                            where c is the growth rate, b is related to the abscissa of maximum
nential growth and brings the system to saturation. In the present                                          growth and g is an asymmetry coefficient. Noting that the x-axis
context, the initially exponential growth is limited to low values                                          in Fig. 3 is reported in logarithmic scale, the use of Eq. (9) in the
of the core flow Weber number Wec and entrained liquid fraction                                              present context yields the following correlating equation for the
e, corresponding to annular flows where most of the liquid flows                                              entrained liquid fraction:
in the film. An increase in the entrained liquid fraction e yields an
                                                                                                                                  −1/g                  cg
increase of the core flow density and kinetic energy that enhance                                            e = (1 + b Wec−d )             ;     d=                          (10)
                                                                                                                                                      ln(10)
the liquid film atomization, thus triggering a further increase in e
that gives rise to a positive feedback. The final damping and sat-                                           where the parameters b, c and g have to be determined from the
uration is reached for high values of the core flow Weber number                                             experimental data solving a nonlinear regression problem. Since
Wec and entrained liquid fraction e, corresponding to annular flows                                          the regression is done using the entire databank, it is wise to use
where most of the liquid is entrained and the liquid film is corre-                                          outlier-resistant or so called robust procedures for estimating the
spondingly very thin. As e further increases, less and less liquid                                          regression model coefficients b, c and g, in order for the prelimi-
remains available for further atomization, giving rise to a negative                                        nary fit to properly capture the trend of the bulk of the data and not
feedback. As can be noticed in Fig. 3, although the majority of the                                         being excessively distorted by the outliers. In particular, the robust
data points cluster, some anomalous records that appear to deviate                                          method of least-absolute-residuals is used here. This method min-
from the behavior seen in the bulk of the data are as well recog-                                           imizes the sum of the absolute values of the residuals, instead of
nizable. These outliers, which are almost always present in large                                           minimizing the sum of the squares of the residuals as happens with
datasets, can be normally traced back to measuring errors, sen-                                             least-squares methods. This guarantees that extreme points in the
sor malfunctions, measurements carried out outside the range of                                             databank have a milder influence on the fit that, therefore, better
optimal operation of the experimental stand or errors occurred in                                           captures the trend of the bulk of the data. Once the preliminary
the recording, post-processing or reporting of the data. In particu-                                        fitting equation is available, every data point in the databank is
lar, these outlying observations can be seen in Fig. 3 to be mostly                                         tested to determine whether it is an outlier according to the fol-
concentrated above the trend of the bulk of the data. This asym-                                            lowing outlier detection rule, called standard symmetric boxplot
metry in the outliers distribution is believed to be the consequence                                        (Pearson, 2005):
of the slight contamination of the databank already discussed in                                                                  
                                                                                                            if R − median (R) > 2 · IQD ⇒ Current record is outlier        (11)
Section 2. In particular, the present dataset contains a residual tail
of points taken close to the intermittent to annular flow transi-                                            where the residual R is the difference between the measured
tion, where more liquid is typically present in the core flow in the                                         entrained liquid fraction value and the prediction of the prelimi-
form of ligaments and bridges, and a residual tail of points taken                                          nary fit generated in the first step of the analysis, the median of
close to the flow reversal limit, where gravity assists the liquid film                                       the residuals provides an outlier-resistant estimate of the nomi-
atomization.                                                                                                nal residual value, while the interquartile distance IQD provides an
    It is well known that even a few of these anomalous records in                                          outlier-resistant estimate of the scale of natural variation of the
a large dataset can have a disproportionate influence on the ana-                                            residuals about the nominal value. According to this decision rule,
lytical results derived from analyzing the data, so that in general                                         a data point is identified as an outlier if its residual deviates from
outliers have to be handled properly during the modeling of the                                             the median of the residuals more than two times the interquartile
206                                                                     A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213
                                                                1
                                                                        All Data
                                                                        Clean Data
                                                            0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
                                                                0 1                         2                       3                        4                            5
                                                                10                     10                      10                       10                           10
                                                                                                Core Flow Weber Number
Fig. 4. Entrained liquid fraction data of Table 1 vs. core flow Weber number as defined in Eq. (8).
distance of the residuals. Once outliers have been identified, they                                               without success, however. Probably, the significant scatter in the
are removed from the databank and the preliminary fitting equa-                                                   available data is large enough to hide any fine details, so that only
tion derived in the first step of the analysis is refined using the clean                                          the predominant influence of the core flow Weber number clearly
data only. The correlating equation that is finally obtained is:                                                  emerges, while any second order effect is lost. As such, future
                             −2.209                                                                              research should concentrate on developing new and less invasive
e = (1 + 279.6Wec−0.8395 )                                  ;       101 < Wec < 105                   (12)       measuring techniques for the entrained liquid fraction.
where the core flow Weber number is as defined in Eq. (8). The                                                         Since the core flow density c depends on the entrained liquid
correlating Eq. (12) is displayed in Fig. 4 together with the entire                                             fraction e, as can be seen in Eq. (2), in principle the proposed cor-
databank in Table 1 (black circles) and the cleaned databank that is                                             relating equation, Eq. (12), should be used iteratively. In order to
obtained from Table 1 after the outliers have been removed (red                                                  simplify its use for engineering applications, however, the imple-
dots). (For interpretation of the references to color in this text,                                              mentation of Eq. (12) that is proposed here follows an explicit
the reader is referred to the web version of the article.) As can be                                             predictor–corrector scheme. Predictor–corrector methods, in gen-
seen, Eq. (12) provides a reasonably good fit of the data and nicely                                              eral, are explicit algorithms that proceed in two steps. First, in the
follows the trend of the bulk of the measurements. It is worth high-                                             predictor step a rough approximation of the desired quantity is cal-
lighting that outliers are removed from the databank of Table 1                                                  culated. Then, the corrector step refines the initial approximation.
only to derive Eq. (12), but in all the comparisons that will be                                                 In the present context, in particular, in the predictor step the core
presented the entire databank of Table 1 is always used, outliers                                                flow density c is approximated with the gas density g . An esti-
                                                                                                                                                               p
included. It is worth remembering that Eq. (12) is appropriate for                                               mate of the core flow Weber number Wec is then evaluated and
shear-driven annular flows only, where the entrainment process is                                                 used with Eq. (12) to get a preliminary estimate of the entrained
essentially due to the shearing off of the disturbance wave crests                                               liquid fraction ep :
by the droplet-laden gas core flow. As can be seen in Fig. 4, the
majority of the records that appear to deviate markedly from the                                                                         g Jg2 d
                                                                                                                                   p                                                p−0.8395 −2.209
trend of the bulk of the data are actually identified as outliers by the                                          c ≈ g ⇒ Wec =                     ;   ep = (1 + 279.6Wec                  )        (13)
                                                                                                                                                 
procedure described above. In particular, the procedure identifies
190 data points as outliers, corresponding to a dataset contami-
nation of 8.3%. Considering that contamination levels between 1%                                                 In the corrector step, the preliminary estimate of the entrained
and 10% are quite common (Pearson, 2005) and remembering that                                                    liquid fraction ep is used to calculate the core flow density c , as
the entrained liquid fraction is a particularly difficult parameter                                               indicated in Eq. (14). The core flow Weber number is then updated
to measure, the 8.3% contamination level predicted here appears                                                  and used with Eq. (12) to get the final prediction for the entrained
reasonable. Further inspection of Fig. 4 shows that the outlier detec-                                           liquid fraction:
tion procedure used here seems to be less effective at low core flow
Weber number values, since a tail of entrained liquid fraction values                                                         x + ep (1 − x)                                  c Jg2 d
above the trend of the bulk of the data is not identified as anoma-                                               c =                               ;               Wec =                ;
                                                                                                                        (x/g ) + ((ep (1 − x)/l )                             
lous. As already noticed, however, the region e → 0+ is not critical
                                                                                                                                                                               −2.209
for the applications. Besides its efficiency (Pearson, 2005), the out-                                                                  e = (1 + 279.6 Wec−0.8395 )                                    (14)
lier detection procedure used here was also selected because it can
be easily coded into most computing software tools using built-in
features only. It is worth highlighting, however, that many other
outlier detection algorithms are available in the robust statistics                                                 The above predictor–corrector scheme is simple, explicit and
literature and many more are likely to become available in the                                                   can be easily coded into existing simulation tools. In what fol-
near future, since automatic outlier detection is currently being                                                lows, the predictions from Eq. (12) are always obtained using the
extensively investigated for numerous data-mining applications,                                                  above predictor–corrector scheme. With respect to the old predic-
such as credit card fraud detection, clinical trials, voting irregular-                                          tion method proposed in Cioncolini and Thome (2010), therefore,
ity analysis, network intrusion detection and athlete performance                                                the updated method proposed here is much simpler to use, being
analysis.                                                                                                        explicit and fully stand-alone, and is based on a much wider
    The inclusion into the proposed correlation, Eq. (12), of fur-                                               experimental databank that besides adiabatic flows now covers
ther dimensionless groups to improve its accuracy was attempted                                                  evaporating flow conditions and non-circular geometries as well.
                                                                               A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213                                    207
                                                                      0
                                                                 10
+ 50 %
                                                                      -2
                                                                 10
                                                                           - 50 %
                                                                      -3
                                                                 10 -2                                                               -1                                  0
                                                                   10                                                           10                                  10
                                                                                                               Entrained Liquid Fraction: Predicted
                                                                      0
                                                                 10
                                    Entrained Liquid Fraction:
                                           Experimental
                                                                      -1
                                                                 10
+ 50 %
                                                                      -2
                                                                 10
                                                                           - 50 %
                                                                      -3
                                                                 10 -2                                                               -1                                  0
                                                                   10                                                           10                                  10
                                                                                                               Entrained Liquid Fraction: Predicted
Fig. 5. Entrained liquid fraction: experimental data from Table 1 vs. predictions of Eq. (12) [top] and predictions of Ishii and Mishima (1989) correlation [bottom].
4. Results and discussion                                                                                                       (1996b), Utsuno and Kaminaga (1998), Pan and Hanratty (2002),
                                                                                                                                Sawant et al. (2008, 2009) and Cioncolini and Thome (2010). Fur-
    The comparison of the measured data from Table 1 with the                                                                   ther details regarding these correlations and their implementation
predictions of Eq. (12) is presented in Fig. 5 (top). The statistical                                                           can be found in the Electronic Annex, available in the online ver-
comparison between measured data from Table 1 and predic-                                                                       sion of this article. As can be seen in Table 3, the new prediction
tions is reported in Table 3, which includes both the predictor and                                                             method proposed here fits the available data better than the other
the corrector steps and also the results of the correlations pro-                                                               methods considered, with a mean absolute percentage error of
posed by Paleev and Filippovich (1966), Wallis (1968), Oliemans                                                                 34.1% and about 6 points out of 10 captured to within ±30% (in
et al. (1986), Ishii and Mishima (1989), Nakazatomi and Sekoguchi                                                               the present study, the empirical correlations are ranked on the
Table 3
Statistical comparison between experimental data of Table 1 and correlations.
                                                              1
                                                                     Gill et al. (1964,1969)                                   + 30 %               Eq. (12)
                                                                     Cousins et al. (1965,1968a,b)
0.4
0.2
                                                              0 1                        2                      3                       4                           5
                                                              10                    10                     10                      10                          10
                                                                                             Core Flow Weber Number
                                                              1
                                                                                                                              + 30 %
                                                                    Hewitt&Pulling (1969)
                                                                    Keeys at al. (1970)
                                 Entrained Liquid Fraction
0.4
0.2
                                                              0 1                        2                      3                       4                           5
                                                              10                    10                     10                      10                          10
                                                                                             Core Flow Weber Number
                                                              1
                                                                    Adamsson&Anglart (2006)                              + 30 %                       Eq. (12)
                                                                    Wurtz (1978)
                                 Entrained Liquid Fraction
0.4
0.2
                                                               01                       2                       3                       4                               5
                                                              10                   10                      10                      10                          10
                                                                                             Core Flow Weber Number
Fig. 6. Entrained liquid fraction data of Table 1: selected water–air low pressure data [top], adiabatic water–steam data [middle] and data taken under evaporating flow
conditions [bottom].
basis of their mean absolute percentage error; if two correla-                                               the proposed method has been designed with the present data-
tions yield comparable values of the mean absolute percentage                                                bank while the other correlations are based on different data sets.
error, i.e. difference within ±1%, then the ranking is done accord-                                          Nonetheless, the good correlating capability of Eq. (12) suggests
ing to the percentage of data captured within ±15%, ±30% and                                                 that considering annular flows as a form of a liquid atomization
±50%). Even the preliminary estimate provided by the predictor                                               process is a promising assumption in their modeling, at least as
step is quite accurate and slightly outperforms existing predic-                                             long as the entrainment process is mostly due to the shearing
tion methods, although the corrector step definitely improves the                                             off of the disturbance wave crests by the droplet-laden gas core
prediction accuracy. The best predictions by an existing method                                              flow.
are given by the correlation of Ishii and Mishima (1989), often                                                  Selected low pressure air–water data are presented in Fig. 6
employed in thermal–hydraulic simulation codes. The compari-                                                 (top), together with the proposed correlation Eq. (12). The avail-
son of the measured data with the predictions of the correlation                                             able water–steam adiabatic data are presented in Fig. 6 (middle),
of Ishii and Mishima (1989) is presented in Fig. 5 (bottom). Anal-                                           while Fig. 6 (bottom) shows the available data taken under evapo-
ogous figures for the other correlations considered are included in                                           rating flow conditions with water–steam and refrigerants R12 and
the Electronic Annex. Direct comparison of the prediction method                                             R113. As can be seen, the agreement of the data with Eq. (12) is for
proposed here with other correlations is somewhat unfair, as                                                 the most part quite satisfactory.
                                                                  A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213                                   209
                                                            1
                                                                  Adiabatic                                                   + 30 %                      Eq. (12)
                                                                  Evaporating
                                                           0.8
0.4
0.2
                                                            0 1                        2                       3                        4                                 5
                                                            10                    10                      10                       10                                10
                                                                                           Core Flow Weber Number
                                                           0.6
                                                                  No Grid Spacers                                    + 30 %                 Eq. (12)
                                                                  EggCrate-Upstream
                                                           0.5
                                                                  EggCrate-Downstream
                               Entrained Liquid Fraction
                                                                                                                                                       - 30 %
                                                                  ULTRAFLOW-Upstream
                                                           0.4    ULTRAFLOW-Downstream
0.3
0.2
0.1
                                                            0 2                                                3                                                          4
                                                            10                                            10                                                         10
                                                                                           Core Flow Weber Number
Fig. 7. Entrained liquid fraction data of Table 2: annulus data of Würtz (1978) [top] and rod bundle data of Feldhaus et al. (2002) [bottom].
    The proposed correlation Eq. (12) is based on the databank of                                          is extrapolated to the non-circular geometries in Fig. 7 using the
                                                                                                                                            −1
Table 1, which is limited to vertical flow through circular tubes                                           hydraulic diameter (4 Aflow Pwet    ) in place of the tube diameter. As
and is biased towards adiabatic, fully developed, low pressure and                                         can be seen, the agreement is for the most part satisfactory. As can
low mass flux flow conditions, as already discussed. As such, the                                            be noticed in Fig. 7 (bottom), the measurements carried out down-
application of Eq. (12) to nuclear reactor operating conditions, char-                                     stream of the ULTRAFLOW grid spacer are consistently below the
acterized by non-circular channel geometry, annular flows entered                                           other data, as expected since this grid spacer is provided with flow
from intermittent flow without any flow developing length and                                                vanes designed to force the entrained liquid droplets to deposit
evaporating flow conditions with non-uniform heat flux, is not                                               onto the liquid film. The egg-crate grid spacer tested, on the other
straightforward. In what follows, therefore, the application of Eq.                                        hand, does not appear to affect the entrained liquid fraction, since
(12) to nuclear reactor operating conditions is addressed, using                                           the measurements carried out upstream and downstream of this
both the tubular data in Table 1 and the additional data collected                                         grid are consistent and compare favorably with the data measured
in Table 2.                                                                                                without grid spacer.
    Measurements in Table 2 carried out by Würtz (1978) in a ver-                                              The available tubular data taken in evaporating flow conditions
tical annulus (water–steam, pressure of 3.0–9.0 MPa, mass flux of                                           in Table 1 are presented in Fig. 8 (top) as the ratio of the mea-
500–2000 kg m−2 s−1 , tube diameter of 26.0 mm, rod diameter of                                            sured entrained liquid fraction to the prediction of the proposed
17.0 mm, hydraulic diameter of 9.0 mm) under both adiabatic and                                            correlation Eq. (12), plotted versus the dimensionless distance L/d
evaporating flow conditions (electrical heating, uniform heat flux)                                          between the measurement point and the location upstream in the
are presented in Fig. 7 (top), while adiabatic measurements car-                                           channel where annular flow is entered from intermittent flow. As
ried out by Feldhaus et al. (2002) in a vertical channel designed to                                       already noted, the transition from intermittent to annular flow
mimic a light water nuclear reactor fuel bundle (water–air, pressure                                       typically corresponds to a local void fraction between 0.7 and 0.8
of 0.1–0.2 MPa, mass flux of 300–450 kg m−2 s−1 , hydraulic diam-                                           (Levy, 1999). Here, in particular, this transition is assumed to occur
eter of 11.8 mm) with and without grid spacers are presented in                                            at a local void fraction of 0.75, and the local void fraction is pre-
Fig. 7 (bottom). Although the local pressure at the measuring posi-                                        dicted according to Woldesemayat and Ghajar (2007). It is well
tion is not specified, the information provided by Feldhaus et al.                                          known that this transition, in reality, is not localized and static
(2002) allows bounding the operating pressure between 0.1 MPa                                              but smeared along a certain tube length, and any void fraction
and 0.2 MPa. Accordingly, the results included in Fig. 7 (bottom)                                          correlation is at most accurate to within a few percent. Nonethe-
are for an operating pressure of 0.15 MPa, and the horizontal error                                        less, the above outlined simplified procedure provides a useful, first
bars account for a ±50 kPa variation in the operating pressure. The                                        approximate estimate of the annular flow boiling length that is not
corresponding variation in the core flow Weber number is signifi-                                            experimentally available. Notwithstanding a few outliers, the pro-
cant, as can be seen in Fig. 7 (bottom), as a result of the strong air                                     posed correlation Eq. (12) seems to perform well in the region of
density dependence on pressure. The proposed correlation Eq. (12)                                          L/d > 50, as can be seen in Fig. 8 (top). In the region of 0 < L/d < 50, on
210                                                                           A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213
                                                                      1
                                                                 10
                                                                                                                                          Adamsson&Anglart (2006)
                                                                                                                                          Wurtz (1978)
                                                                      0
                                                                 10
                                                                      -1
                                                                 10
                                                                          0          50          100        150         200         250       300         350        400
                                                                                                       Annular Flow Boiling Length L/d
                                                                 1.25
                                                                                 Uniform
                                                                  1.2            Inlet peaked
                                  Entrained Liquid Fraction:
                                                                                 Middle peaked
                                   Measured vs. Predicted
                                                                 1.15
                                                                                 Outlet peaked
                                                                  1.1
1.05
0.95
0.9
0.85
                                                                  0.8
                                                                     60                80           100           120         140          160          180          200
                                                                                                       Annular Flow Boiling Length L/d
Fig. 8. Ratio of the measured entrained liquid fraction to the prediction of Eq. (12) plotted vs. annular flow boiling length L/d: all evaporating flow conditions data from
Table 1 [top] and Adamsson and Anglart data (2006) with different heat flux profiles [bottom].
the other hand, the data of Milashenko et al. (1989) are correctly                                                      length estimated as described above is L/d > 50. Application of Eq.
reproduced, while the data of Würtz (1978) are partly captured                                                          (12) for L/d < 50 may underpredict the entrained liquid fraction,
and partly underpredicted. Although the majority of the data in                                                         although not enough data in this region seem available to draw
this region is correctly reproduced, the application of the proposed                                                    any definite conclusion. The axial power profile is not found to
correlation Eq. (12) in this range should be done with care, as only                                                    appreciably affect the entrained liquid fraction measurements, so
few data from two independent studies are available. The data in                                                        that only the total power supplied seems relevant but not its actual
Fig. 8 (top) characterized by L/d = 0, that correspond to void frac-                                                    shape profile. A developing length of L/d ∼ 50 for evaporating annu-
tion estimates at the measurement point below 0.75, tend to be                                                          lar flows entered from intermittent flow is much smaller than the
underpredicted by the proposed correlation Eq. (12). This seems                                                         developing lengths typically found in adiabatic, two-component
plausible, as in intermittent flows the phases are less separated                                                        annular flow, that can reach as high as L/d ∼ 200–300 (Wolf et al.,
than in annular flows, and more liquid is present in the central                                                         2001). Adiabatic, two-component annular flows are typically gen-
part of the channel in the form of ligaments and bridges. The mea-                                                      erated from a single-phase gas flow by injecting the liquid phase
surements of Adamsson and Anglart (2006), obtained at conditions                                                        either as a film at the channel wall or as a jet at the channel axis. In
typical of boiling water nuclear reactors (water–steam, pressure                                                        the former case a perfectly segregated, ideal annular flow with no
of 7.0 MPa, mass flux of 750–1750 kg m−2 s−1 , tube diameter of                                                          entrained droplets is generated (e ∼ 0+ ), while in the latter case the
14.0 mm, electrical heating) are displayed in Fig. 8 (bottom) as the                                                    liquid jet gets atomized and a perfectly mixed mist flow is gener-
ratio of the measured entrained liquid fraction to the prediction of                                                    ated (e ∼ 1− ). Both flow conditions are significantly different from
the proposed correlation Eq. (12), plotted versus the dimension-                                                        a real annular flow, and this explains why a very long developing
less annular flow boiling length L/d, predicted as discussed above.                                                      length is required to damp out inlet effects. In boiling channels,
Besides using a uniform axial power distribution, Adamsson and                                                          on the other hand, annular flow is entered from intermittent flow,
Anglart (2006) made also tests with inlet-peaked, middle-peaked                                                         which from a fluid-dynamics point of view is not that different
and outlet-peaked power profiles, in order to better approximate                                                         from an annular flow, having only less phase segregation, lower slip
the actual thermal–hydraulics of boiling water nuclear reactors. As                                                     and more liquid in the center of the channel. As such, the shorter
can be seen, the predicted annular flow boiling length L/d is in the                                                     developing length for evaporating annular flows appears physically
range of 70–190, the data are nicely reproduced by the proposed                                                         plausible.
correlation Eq. (12) and no effect of the non-uniform heat flux can                                                          Horizontal and inclined channel data for low pressure air–water
be noticed.                                                                                                             flows from Table 2 are presented in Fig. 9, together with the pro-
   In conclusion, and within the limits of the present study, the                                                       posed correlation Eq. (12). Although the scatter is significant and
proposed correlation Eq. (12) seems suitable for nuclear reactor                                                        the data quite limited, the trend seems correctly captured by Eq.
operating conditions provided that the hydraulic diameter is used                                                       (12). This is noteworthy, since these data refer to strongly asym-
in place of the tube diameter and that the annular flow boiling                                                          metric annular flows, where the liquid film flowing on the bottom
                                                                                        A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213                                                                                         211
                                                                                1
                                                                                       Williams et al. (1996)                                                                    + 30 %                     Eq. (12)
                                                                                       Dallman et al. (1984)
0.4
0.2
                                                                                0 1                            2                              3                                              4                            5
                                                                                10                        10                             10                                             10                           10
                                                                                                                         Core Flow Weber Number
of the channel is much thicker than the liquid film flowing on the                                                                          is more intense. According to Geraci et al. (2007), this compensa-
top. This is consistent with the findings of Geraci et al. (2007), who                                                                     tion is responsible for the mild dependence of the entrained liquid
tested pipe inclinations of 0◦ , 20◦ , 45◦ , 70◦ and 85◦ from the hor-                                                                    fraction on pipe inclination.
izontal and found that there is not a strong dependence of the                                                                                Finally, selected simulations showing the sensitivity of the pre-
entrained liquid fraction on pipe inclination. The interpretation                                                                         dictions of the proposed correlation Eq. (12) to the vapor quality,
provided by Geraci et al. (2007) is related to the effect of gravity on                                                                   operating pressure, mass flux and tube diameter are included in
the morphology of the disturbance waves. In vertical annular flows,                                                                        Fig. 10. As can be seen, the entrained liquid fraction is predicted to
disturbance waves are present over the entire tube periphery, so                                                                          increase with an increase of vapor quality, an increase of the mass
that the entire tube perimeter is participating in the entrainment                                                                        flux, a decrease of the operating pressure and an increase of the tube
process. In horizontal or inclined annular flows, however, distur-                                                                         diameter. All these predicted trends appear physically consistent.
bance waves are present only at the bottom of the tube, since the                                                                         An increase of the vapor quality or mass flux triggers an increase
liquid film streaming on the tube top is too thin for disturbance                                                                          of the kinetic energy of the core flow, which provides the energy
waves to develop and only small ripples are present, not partic-                                                                          that drives the liquid film atomization and thus yields an increase
ipating in the entrainment process. As such, only the lower part                                                                          in the entrained liquid fraction. A reduction in the operating pres-
of the tube periphery is participating in the entrainment process                                                                         sure is followed by a higher liquid to vapor density ratio that yields
in horizontal or inclined channels. Disturbance waves are however                                                                         a higher slip between the phases and consequently a higher inter-
thicker than those appearing in vertical flows, so that the entrain-                                                                       facial shear, which increases the liquid film atomization and the
ment process, although limited to a fraction of the tube perimeter,                                                                       entrained liquid fraction. Finally, a tube diameter reduction yields
                                                                                            -2 -1                                                                                                           -2 -1
                                          P=7.0 MPa; G=1000 kgm s ; d=10 mm                                                                                                                  G=1000 kgm s ; d=10 mm
                                    1                                                                                                                                      1
       Entrained Liquid Fraction
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
                                   0.4                                                                                                                                    0.4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        P=0.1 MPa
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        P=1.0 MPa
                                   0.2                                                                                                                                    0.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        P=5.0 MPa
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        P=10.0 MPa
                                    0                                                                                                                                      0
                                    0.2   0.3     0.4                                 0.5           0.6            0.7             0.8                                     0.2    0.3            0.4         0.5              0.6       0.7             0.8
                                                                              Vapor Quality                                                                                                            Vapor Quality
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                -2 -1
                                                P=7.0 MPa; d=10 mm                                                                                                                           P=7.0 MPa; G=1000 kgm s
                                    1                                                                                                                                      1
       Entrained Liquid Fraction
0.8 0.8
0.6 0.6
                                   0.4                                                                                    -2 -1
                                                                                                           G=500 kgm s                                                    0.4
                                                                                                           G=1000 kgm s
                                                                                                                           -2 -1                                                                                                              d=5 mm
                                   0.2                                                                                     -2 -1                                                                                                              d=10 mm
                                                                                                           G=1500 kgm s                                                   0.2
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              d=15 mm
                                                                                                                           -2 -1
                                                                                                           G=2000 kgm s                                                                                                                       d=20 mm
                                    0                                                                                                                                      0
                                    0.2   0.3     0.4                                 0.5           0.6            0.7             0.8                                     0.2    0.3            0.4         0.5              0.6       0.7             0.8
                                                                              Vapor Quality                                                                                                            Vapor Quality
Fig. 10. water–steam simulations for a pressure of 7.0 MPa, a mass flux of 1000 kg m−2 s−1 and tube diameter of 10 mm. Entrained liquid fraction predicted with Eq. (12) vs.
vapor quality [top-left] and sensitivity to pressure [top-right], mass flux [bottom-left] and tube diameter [bottom-right].
212                                                 A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213
an increase in the stability of the liquid film, as the surface tension                       Dallman, J.C., Laurinat, J.E., Hanratty, T.J., 1984. Entrainment for horizontal annular
force scales as d−1 , so that the smaller the tube diameter the better                           gas–liquid flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 10, 677–690.
                                                                                             Feldhaus, G., Azzopardi, B.J., Zeggel, W., 2002. Annular flow experiments in rod
surface tension resists the liquid film atomization.                                               bundles with spacers. Nucl. Eng. Des. 213, 199–207.
   Additional figures that show the ratios of the entrained liquid                            Geraci, G., Azzopardi, B.J., van Maanen, H.R.E., 2007. Inclination effects on circumfer-
fraction values predicted with the new method to the measured                                     ential film flow distribution in annular gas/liquid flows. AIChE J. 53, 1144–1150.
                                                                                             Gill, L.E., Hewitt, G.F., Lacey, P.M.C., 1964. Sampling probe studies of the gas core in
data displayed versus the tube diameter, operating pressure, vapor                                annular two-phase flow-II: studies of the effect of phase flow rates on phase and
quality and mass flux are included in the Electronic Annex.                                        velocity distribution. Chem. Eng. Sci. 19, 665–682.
                                                                                             Gill, L.E., Hewitt, G.F., Roberts, D.N., 1969. Study of the behavior of disturbance waves
                                                                                                  in annular flow in a long vertical tube. Report AERE-R 6012, UKAEA, Harwell,
5. Conclusions                                                                                    Oxon.
                                                                                             Han, H., Gabriel, K.S., Wang, Z., 2007. A new method of entrainment fraction mea-
                                                                                                  surement in annular gas–liquid flow in a small diameter vertical tube. Flow
    A new prediction method for the entrained liquid fraction in
                                                                                                  Meas. Inst. 18, 79–86.
annular two-phase flow was proposed, based on the assumption                                  Hewitt, G.F., Hall-Taylor, N.S., 1970. Annular Two-Phase Flow. Pergamon Press, New
that annular flows can be regarded as a special form of a liq-                                     York.
                                                                                             Hewitt, G.F., Pulling, D.J., 1969. Liquid entrainment in adiabatic steam–water flow.
uid atomization process. The underlying experimental databank
                                                                                                  Report AERE-R 5374, UKAEA, Harwell, Oxon.
contains 2293 data points for vertical flow in circular tubes cover-                          Hinkle, W.D., 1967. A study of liquid mass transport in annular air–water flow. Ph.D.
ing both adiabatic and evaporating flow conditions, and 167 more                                   Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, USA.
data points for non-circular channels and horizontal and inclined                            Ishii, M., Mishima, K., 1989. Droplet entrainment correlation in annular two-phase
                                                                                                  flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 32, 1835–1846.
flows. The new prediction method is based on the core flow Weber                               Jagota, A.K., Rhodes, E., Scott, D.S., 1973. Tracer measurements in two phase annular
number, a single and physically plausible dimensionless group                                     flow to obtain interchange and entrainment. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 51, 139–148.
and is explicit and fully stand-alone, features that facilitate its                          Jepson, D.M., Azzopardi, B.J., Whalley, P.B., 1989. The effect of gas properties on drops
                                                                                                  in annular flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 15, 327–339.
implementation into existing reactor simulation codes. This new                              Jukić, D., Scitovski, R., 1996. The existence of optimal parameters of the generalized
method reproduces the available data better than existing empiri-                                 logistic function. Appl. Math. Comput. 77, 281–294.
cal correlations and can be extrapolated to nuclear reactor cooling                          Keeys, R.K.F., Ralph, J.C., Roberts, D.N., 1970. Liquid entrainment in adiabatic
                                                                                                  steam–water flow at 500 and 1000 psia. Report AERE-R 6293, UKAEA, Harwell,
applications.                                                                                     Oxon.
                                                                                             Levy, S., 1999. Two-Phase Flow in Complex Systems. Wiley, New York.
                                                                                             Lopez de Bertodano, M.A., Assad, A., Beus, S.G., 2001. Experiments for entrainment
Acknowledgements                                                                                  rate of droplets in the annular regime. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 27, 685–699.
                                                                                             Mayinger, F., Langner, H., 1976. Steady state and transient entrainment behavior
   A part of the annular flow databank was provided by Professor                                   in upwards co-current annular flow. In: Proc. of the ‘NATO Advanced Study
                                                                                                  Institute on Two-Phase Flow and Heat Transfer’, Istanbul, Turkey.
R.V.A. Oliemans, who is gratefully acknowledged. A. Cioncolini is
                                                                                             Milashenko, V.I., Nigmatulin, B.I., Petukhov, V.V., Trubkin, N.I., 1989. Burnout and dis-
supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) under                                   tribution of liquid in evaporative channels of various lengths. Int. J. Multiphase
Contract No. 200020-129624/1.                                                                     Flow 15, 393–401.
                                                                                             Minh, T.Q., Huyghe, J.D., 1965. Some hydrodynamical aspects of annular dispersed
                                                                                                  flow, entrainment and film thickness. Two-Phase Flow Symp., Exeter, Devon,
Appendix A. Supplementary data                                                                    paper C2.
                                                                                             Nakazatomi, M., Sekoguchi, K., 1996a. Effect of pressure on entrainment flow rate
                                                                                                  in vertical upward gas–liquid annular two-phase flow. Part I: experimental
   Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in                               results for system pressures from 0.3 MPa to 20 MPa. Heat Transfer Jpn. Res.
the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.11.014.                                       25, 267–280.
                                                                                             Nakazatomi, M., Sekoguchi, K., 1996b. Effect of pressure on entrainment flow rate
                                                                                                  in vertical upward gas–liquid annular two-phase flow. Part II: an assessment of
References                                                                                        published correlations of entrainment flow rate through high pressure data and
                                                                                                  proposal of new correlations. Heat Transfer Jpn. Res. 25, 281–292.
Adamsson, C., Anglart, H., 2006. Film flow measurements for high-pressure diabatic            Nigmatulin, B.I., Malyshenko, V.I., Shugaev, Y.Z., 1977. Investigation of liquid distri-
    annular flow in tubes with various axial power distributions. Nucl. Eng. Des. 236,             bution between the core and the film in annular dispersed flow of steam–water
    2485–2493.                                                                                    mixtures. Therm. Eng. 23, 66–68.
Al-Yarubi, Q., Lucas, G.,2008. Measurement of the film thickness, film velocity profile         Okawa, T., Kotani, A., Kataoka, I., 2005. Experiments for liquid phase mass transfer
    and entrainment fraction in a liquid-air annular flow using a conductance flow                  rate in annular regime for a small vertical tube. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 48,
    meter. In: Computing and Engineering Annual Researchers’ Conference 2008.                     585–598.
    University of Huddersfield, pp. 63–68.                                                    Oliemans, R.V.A., Pots, B.F.M., Trompé, N., 1986. Modeling of annular dispersed two-
Andreussi, P., 1983. Droplet transfer in two-phase annular flow. Int. J. Multiphase                phase flow in vertical pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 12, 711–732.
    Flow 9, 697–713.                                                                         Ousaka, A., Kariyasaki, A., 1992. Distribution of entrainment flow rate for air–water
Assad, A., Jan, C., Lopez de Bertodano, M.A., Beus, S.G., 1998. Scaled entrainment mea-           annular two-phase flow in a horizontal tube. JSME Int. J. Ser. II 35, 354–360.
    surements in ripple annular flow in a small tube. Nucl. Eng. Des. 184, 437–447.           Paleev, I.I., Filippovich, B.S., 1966. Phenomena of liquid transfer in two-phase dis-
Azzopardi, B.J., Zaidi, S.H., 2000. Determination of entrained fraction in vertical               persed annular flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 9, 1089–1093.
    annular gas–liquid flow. ASME J. Fluids Eng. 122, 146–150.                                Pan, L., Hanratty, T.J., 2002. Correlation of entrainment for annular flow in vertical
Brown, D.J., 1978. Disequilibrium annular flow. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Oxford,                pipes. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 28, 363–384.
    Oxon.                                                                                    Paras, S.V., Karabelas, A.J., 1991. Droplet entrainment and deposition in horizontal
Chexal, B., Horowitz, J., Lellouche, G., 1986. An Assessment of Eight Void Fraction               annular flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 17, 455–468.
    Models for Vertical Flows. NSAC-107. Electric Power Research Institute, Nuclear          Pearson, R.K., 2005. Mining Imperfect Data. SIAM, USA.
    Safety Analysis Center, Palo Alto, USA.                                                  Sawant, P., Ishii, M., Mori, M., 2008. Droplet entrainment correlation in vertical
Cioncolini, A., Thome, J.R., Lombardi, C., 2009a. Algebraic turbulence modeling in adi-           upward co-current annular two-phase flow. Nucl. Eng. Des. 238, 1342–1352.
    abatic gas–liquid annular two-phase flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 35, 580–596.            Sawant, P., Ishii, M., Mori, M., 2009. Prediction of amount of entrained droplets in
Cioncolini, A., Thome, J.R., Lombardi, C., 2009b. Unified macro-to-microscale method               vertical annular two-phase flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 30, 715–728.
    to predict two-phase frictional pressure drops of annular flows. Int. J. Multiphase       Schadel, S.A., Leman, G.W., Binder, J.L., Hanratty, T.J., 1990. Rates of atomization and
    Flow 35, 1138–1148.                                                                           deposition in vertical annular flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 16, 363–374.
Cioncolini, A., Thome, J.R., 2010. Prediction of the entrained liquid fraction in vertical   Singh, K., St. Pierre, C.C., Crago, W.A., Moeck, E.O., 1969. Liquid film flow rates in two
    annular gas–liquid two-phase flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 36, 293–302.                        phase flow of steam and water at 1000 psia. AIChE J. 15, 51–56.
Cioncolini, A., Thome, J.R., 2011. Algebraic turbulence modeling in adiabatic and            Steen, D.A., Wallis, G.B., 1964. The transition from annular to annular-mist concur-
    evaporating annular two-phase flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 32, 805–817.                       rent two-phase downflow. US-Euratom Report EURAEC-1147.
Cousins, L.B., Denton, W.H., Hewitt, G.F., 1965. Liquid mass transfer in annular two-        Tong, L.S., Weisman, J., 1996. Thermal Analysis of Pressurized Water Reactors. Amer-
    phase flow. Two-Phase Flow Symp., Exeter, Devon, Paper C4.                                     ican Nuclear Society, USA.
Cousins, L.B., Hewitt, G.F., 1968. Liquid phase mass transfer in annular two-phase           Ueda, T., Kim, K., 1982. Dryout heat flux and size of entrained drops in a flow boiling
    flow: droplet deposition and liquid entrainment. Report AERE-R 5657, UKAEA,                    system. Bull. JSME 25, 225–233.
    Harwell, Oxon.                                                                           Utsuno, H., Kaminaga, F., 1998. Prediction of liquid film dryout in two-phase annular
Cousins, L.B., Hewitt, G.F., 1968. Liquid phase mass transfer in annular two-phase                mist flow in a uniformly heated narrow tube: development of analytical method
    flow: radial liquid mixing. Report AERE-R 5693, UKAEA, Harwell, Oxon.                          under BWR conditions. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 35, 643–653.
                                                A. Cioncolini, J.R. Thome / Nuclear Engineering and Design 243 (2012) 200–213                                             213
Wallis, G.B., 1961. Flooding velocities for air and water in vertical tubes. United      Woldesemayat, M.A., Ghajar, A.J., 2007. Comparison of void fraction correlations for
    Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Report AEEW-R-123, England.                            different flow patterns in horizontal and upward inclined pipes. Int. J. Multiphase
Wallis, G.B., 1968. Phenomena of liquid transfer in two-phase dispersed annular             Flow 33, 347–370.
    flow. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 11, 783–785.                                         Wolf, A., Jayanti, S., Hewitt, G.F., 2001. Flow development in vertical annular flow.
Whalley, P.B., Hewitt, G.F., Hutchinson, P., 1974. Experimental wave and entrain-           Chem. Eng. Sci. 56, 3221–3235.
    ment measurements in vertical annular two-phase flow. Symp. Multi-Phase               Würtz, J., 1978. An experimental and theoretical investigation of annular
    Flow Systems, University of Strathclyde, Scotland paper A1.                             steam–water flow in tubes and annuli at 30 and 90 bar. Risø National Laboratory,
Williams, L.R., Dykhno, L.A., Hanratty, T.J., 1996. Droplet flux distributions and           Report No. 372, Denmark.
    entrainment in horizontal gas–liquid flows. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 22, 1–18.