Hindu Marriage Act 1955
Hindu Marriage Act 1955
or c e r e m o n i e s
Q. Explain the nature, concept and object of a Hindu marriage. Discuss the importance
of Hindu marriage.
the father
It is regarded as one of most important ten Sanskaras (sacraments) for them. In marriage
becomes her
entrusts his daughter into the hands of a noble and physically sound groom who thereby
husband. This mode of marriage is well-settled since Vedic period and has assumed religious
to Raghunandan, a Hindu marriage implies the acceptance of the
bride as wife by
significance. According
the groom through a ceremonial process which is technically known as kanyadan.
of caste and
It is the only Sanskara (sacrament) which has not been prohibited for any one irrespective
sex and has been provided as compulsory for all males and females. Through the institution of marriage
birth to male
men and women are united into a wedlock, the purpose of which is generally to give a
child.
performed by
rites are to be Hindu
because all the religious ceremonies and
a
Marriage is essential also It is that marriage
otherwise they will not bear any fruits. noteworthy
in the companionship offiis wifé
as means of satisfying the corporal lust nor does it have the
under Hindu law is not regarded primarily
connotation of contractual obligations.
On the contrary it is simply a religious sacrament and an
It is binding upon every Hindu to marry unless he has taken the vow to lead the life of a perpetual
celebacy and abstinence. Women have been created to become mothers later and similarly men to
become fathers.
he enjoin that a should carry out the religious obligations together with his wife. Only
vedas
is
man
that
man perfect who has a wife and children. Only that man could fulfil his obligations who is blessed with
wite. Only the persons who have wives could lead a family life, those who have wives can alone remain
happy and gay and they alone could lead a perfect life.
Wives have been considered to be the better halves and religious partners of their husbands whicn
means that half part of a man is his wife and that without being married; the personality of a man is
incomplets. Perfection comes only after marriage. In Ramayan, wife has been considered to be thesou
of her husband and in Mahabharat she is stated to be the half part of her husband, and his best friend.
She is regarded as an inspiration to religion, wealth and ambitions.
She is source of salvation, and considered to be Dharmapatni, i.e., lifelong companion to carry out tne
religious injunctions of Vedas and Dharmashastras and to perform religious rites arid ceremonies as
enjoined in
the sacred books. The performance of the religious ceremonies.alóng with the wife is
necessary otherwise they will not bear any fruits.
By marriage an inseparable relationship is created between the husband and wife. The relationship
cannot be broken by any means whatsoever even when the wife'starts living a very wretched life.
According to Manu, the daughter is given in marriage only onceand she remains the wife of that person
to whom she is given in marriage, for her whole life.
. stated five
The two seers known as jurists of later period-namely Narada and Parasar have
eminent
conditions in which a wife could abandon her husband.änd. remarry. These conditions are as under: (1)
where the husband is lost or (2) dead, or (3) hasrenounced the world and has become a sanyasi, or (4)
has become impotent, or (5) has been ousted from his caste. But these conditions of remarriage were
provided only for the marriages of unapproved forms.
The Dharmashastra-writers generally do not agree with the view that a wife could abandon her husband
under any circumstances. The indissóluble tie, created between the spouses, could not be broken in any
case May it be an approved form orunapproved form of marriage. This signifies an unique character of
Hindu marriage.
According to Manuathe remarriage of a woman could not be even imagined. After the death of her
husband, she hastolçad her whole life simply on vegetation and in abstinence emaciating herself to
minimal. She issupposed not to take the name of any person other than her deceased husband. Thus
leading a lieocefebacy and chastity and maintaining abstinence throughout, she earns a right to have
a seat inthefeaven.
AHindumarriage has been said to be a sacrament also because the marital relations between the
spouses are created not on account of any contract between the two but by virtue of a gift of the girl by
her father to the bridegroom. The gift is holy and accompanied with the religious ceremony of Saptapadi
or any other customary religious rites. In absence of such religious ceremonies and rites marriage is said
to have not taken place at all in the eyes of
law.
DAY 1E
13 JCCLCSU 2017.JCCLCTMCPUNIT 2017
STUDENTSWELFARE, RELATION &AID FUND SECRETARIAT
ACADEMIC AFFAIRS SECRETARIAT
last long till their life.
to be sacramental union between the
husband and the wife to
Sidered a
contract as it lackS every
essential
are thus rightly acclaimed as sacrament rather than
arriages marriage the parents or the
CVdd contract, e.g. proposal, acceptance and consideration. In theman after respectfully inviting
of the girl gives her away by way of gift to a noble and virtuous
8udrdian
him and
accomplishing the religious rites and ceremonies.
her with utmost love and respect
nerearter the bridegroom accepts her as his wife and vows to keep contract between
any place for a
s t oreath of her life. Under these conditions there is hardly
bride and bridegroom at the time of
marriage.
Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 recognizes the ceremonies and, customs of marriage.
A Hindu marriage may be solemnized in accordance with the customary anid rites ceremonies of either
party to the marriage .The parties to the marriage fulfill the conditions prescribed as follows:
(1) A Hindu marriage may be solemnized in accordance with the customary rites and ceremonies of
either party thereto.
(2) Where such rites and ceremonies include the saptpadi(thaB is, the taking of seven steps by the
bridegroom and the bride jointly before the sacred fire), the marriage becomes complete and bindingE
when the seventh step is taken.
Ceremonies vary according to custom. The presentation of a pair of cloth by the bridegroom to the bridee
a sacred thread
(pudava koda) is an important customary rite among the Nair caste in Kerala. Tying of
around the neck of the bride (Mangalya Sutra or Tali ) is another rite. Exchange of rings or garlands also
is common. A marriage will be valid anlyif the ceremony through which it is solemnized is sanctioned by
the religion of either party as custoimarýteremony
may be solemnized
between any two Hindus, if the following conditions are fulfilled.
"A marriage
nafnely
1. Neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage;
of unsoundness of mind;
incapable of giving a valid consentto itinconsequence
or
a) is
marriage;
custom or uog
4 parties are not within the degrees of prohibited relationship, unless the
The
governing each of them permits of a marriage between the two
This section lays down five conditions for a valid marriage. They are:
should be monogamous.
1Monogamy(Sec Clause (1)): This provision Prohibits bigamy .Themarriage or divorced or a widow
Under the Hindu Lawa person can validly marry if he or she is either unmarried
or a widower. If at the time of the performance of the marriage rites and ceremonies either party has a
A
set aside, the later marriage is void.
Spouse living or the earlier already been
marriage had not
bigamous marriage is null and void and is made punishable
o n e was
the wife or husband of lineal ascendant or descendant of the otner, o
ii) if one was the wife of the brother or of the father's or mother's brother or of the grandtatners or
A marriage between two persons who come within the degrees of prohibited relationship shall be vola.
For instance, marriage between the children of brother and sister is common among the
marumakathayam of Kerala. In some parts of Tamil Nadu, Marriage between a person and his eldest
sister's daughter is common. Here the parties though comê within the degrees of prohibited
relationsip; they can validly marry by virtue of custom or usage Itis éssential that the custom or usage
should be certain, reasonable and not opposed to public
polic
Punishment :-According to Sec.18(b)A marriage solemnized between the parties within the degrees of
prohibited relationship is null and void and the partiès.bf such marriage are liable to be punished with
simple imprisonment for a period of one month of fine'or Rs. 10000/- or with both.
5. Sapinda Relationship (Sec 5 Clause ($}} Theparties to the marriage should not be related to each
other as Sapindas. A marriage betweensapindas is void.
Under Section 3( Sapinda relatiohship" with reference to any person extends as far as the third
generation (inclusive) intheioe ofascent through the mother, and the fifth (inclusive) in the line of
ascent through the fatherg the Jine being traced upwards in each case from the person concerned, who
is to be counted as the first generation.
(UTwo persons aresaid to be "sapindas" of each other if one is a lineal ascendant of the other within
the limits of "sspinda relationship, or if they have a common lineal ascendant that is within the limits of
"sapinda" relatíonship with reference to each of
them.
No mariage is valid if it is made between parties who are related to each other as 'sapindas' unless such
marriage is sanctioned by usage or custom governing both parties. The custom which permits of a
marriage between people who are sapindas of each other must fulfil the requirements of a valid
custom. The custom must be certain, reasonable and should not be opposed to public policy.
*****
Void Voidable
unsound. AlkavsAbhilash,
Incontravention of 5(i) Mentally
-
Bolokrishnavslalitha
force fraud.
3.Consent obtained by
or
with cesarean.
Husband's pre-marriage boasting
Fraud-Purbivs Basudev 1969-
VIL
NAWIONYAO
about high prospects in
life is not fraud.
Kumar 1986- Wife concealed her age. She
Fraud-SomDutt vs Raj
was 7 yrs elder.
When one of the spouses leaves the other without.ányreàsonable excuse, the latter can approach the
court by fling a petition praying for a decree of gestitutión of conjugal rights. The court after hearing the
petition of the aggrieved spouse, on being satisied that there is no legal ground why the application
shall be refused and on being satisfied of the truth of the statements made in the petition may grant a
decree for restitution of conjugal rights. The person who has deserted the spouse can defend the
petition if there is sufficient cause on
his'or her side.
Firstly, one party must have withdrawn from the society of the other; secondly, the withdrawal must be
without any reasonabe reason, and thirdly, the aggrieved party applies for the restitution of conjugal
rights. Once these.conditiòns are fulfilled, the district court may decree of restitution of conjugal rights
to bring about pohabitation between the estranged parties.
If the aggrieved party is unable to convince the district court and it founds that the petitioner is guilty
then the decree of restitution of conjugai rights is not granted. An added advantage from this is that if
the parties are not following the decree for cohabitation after the passing of the decree, continuously
foroné year, it becomes a ground for divorce under Section 13.
Fesonable grounds on which petltlon for Restitution of Conjugal Rights can be rejected
First, if the respondent has a ground on which he or she can claim any matrimonial relief;
Burden of proof operates at two levels. Firstly, burden of proof is on the aggrieved/petitioner who needs
to prove that the respondent has withdrawn from his society. Once that burden is discharged by the
petitioner, it falls on the respondent to prove that there exists a reasonable excuse for the withdrawal.
What are the additional grounds of divorce available to wife only? erp
of relationship
sexual including intercourse outside
Adultery The/act of indulging in any kind
counted as a criminal offence and substantial proofs are
marriageIs termed as adultery. Adultery is
to the law in 1976 states that one single act of adultery
is
regüiredtó establish it. An amendment
enough for the petitioner to get a divorce.
file a when he/she is subjected to any kind of mental and
divorce case
Cruelty A spouse can
acts of cruelty through
physical injury that causes danger to life, limb and health. The intangible
torture are not Judged upon one single act but series of
incidents. Certain instances like the
mental
food being denied, continuous ill treatment and abuses to acquire dowry, perverse sexual act etc
tne
SOn- Incase either of the two converts himself/herself into another religion, otne
spouse may file a divorce case based on this
ground.
EL Dsorder Mental disorder can become a ground for filing a divorce if the spouse or tne
petitioner suffers from incurable mental disorder and insanity and therefore cannot be expected
from the couple to stay together.
Leprosy I n case of a 'virulent and incurable' form of leprosy, a petition can be filed by the other
spouse based on this ground.
venereal Disease - If one of the spouses is suffering from a serious disease that is easily
communicable, divorce can be filed by the other spouse. The sexually transmitted diseases like
a
AIDS are accounted to be venereal
diseases.
Renunciation-A spouse is entitled to file for a divorce if theotherrenounces all worldly affairs by
embracing a religious order.
NotHeard Alive.- If a person is not seen or heard afiveby those who are expected to be 'naturally
heard' of the person for a continuous period of spvenyèars, the person is presumed to be dead. The
other spouse should need to file a divorce if helshe.is interested in remarriage.
No Resumption of Co-habitation- It becomes a ground for divorce if the couple fails to resume
their co-habitation after the court has passed a decree of separation.
Section 16 of the,HinduMarriage Act 1955 provides that "( 1) Notwithstanding that a marriage is
null and void undet Section Il any child of such marriage who would have been legitimate if the
marriage had been valid shall be legitimate, whether such child is born before or after the
commencementrof Marriage Law (Amendment) Act 1976 & whether or not decree of nullity is
grantedinTespect of that marriage under this Act and whether or not marriage is held to be void
on petition under this Act.
othevisethan
( 2 Where a decree of nullity is granted in respect of voidable marriage under Section 12, any child
begotten or conceived before the decree is made who would have been legitimate child if the
parties to the marriage if at the date of decree it had been dissolved instead of being annulled, shall
be deemed to be their legitimate. Child notwithstanding the decree of nullity.
(3) Nothing contained in Sub Section (1) & (2) shall be construed as conferring upon any child ofa
marriage which is null and void or which is annulled by a decree of nullity under Section 12 any right
The parties have been living separately for a period of at least one year
livetogether, and
They have not been able to
They have mutually agreed that marriage should be resolved
If these conditions are satisfied then oply the person will be guilty of committing the offence of adultery.
reversed the order of high court and thereby granting the decree of divorce to the husband.
Hirachand Srinivas Managaonkar Vs Sunanda (AIR 2001 SC 1285): - In this case the respondent that is
the high
her husband. Accordingly
the wife petition for divorce seeking judicial separation against
filed a
husband to give maintenance
cOurt of Karnataka granted a decree for judicial separation and ordered
filed a petition for divorce under
charges to his wife and daughter. But the husband after two years of
section 13(1-A)(a)of the Hindu marriage act, 1955 on the ground that
there has been no resumption
the decree of judicial separation.
cohabitation between the parties for more than one year after passing
as a ground of
that whether this can be taken
Hence the question before the Supreme Court was
the
under the same roof even after
divorce even after the husband and the wife as in this case are living live in
to
held that husband who continued
passing of the decree of judicial separation. The court succeed fora
adultery even after the passing of decree of judicial separation
with his wife will riot
petition of divorce under section 13(1-A)(a).
and
itselfunder section 497 of IPC with
is mentioned
Punishment for Adultery: Punishment for adultery for a temof five years, or withfine,
or
accordingly the person shall be punished with imprisonment crime and hence this is the
both. In this section wife is not punished even if she acts as an abettor in this However this
wife should alsobe punished for adultery.
big question before the legislators that whether
question has
implemented.
been dealt in the
CORPU
CORPO
Malimath committee report-anddegislations
have been done but still not
CRUELTY the
universally defined till now. It depends upon
not been
Definition of Cruelty:- Cruelty haa described
circumstances of the case and the country
and time. Russel v/s Russel, 1897 Cruelty has been
under physical or mental form of
as characterial
such conduct which may put life and body
behayiour or
danger or may arise apRrehension of such danger.
in matrimonial context, it shall show
that any party to marriage may
If the definition is understood other party to live with him, this shall
in such manner that it shall be difficult for
behave with
be cruelty.
ANC
otherparty
Similar case is Yadhister Singh v/s Smt. Sarita, 2002 wife used to live at ancestral home of husband.
Husband was working somewhere else. Husband never wanted to keep wife along with him. He used to
come at his ancestral home once a week. He did not used to say his wife that he did not liked her, but he
nere are several cases of cruelty. Actually the definition of cruelty depends upon the circuna
the case.
Types of Cruelty
a. Physical Cruelty.
b. Mental Cruelty.
Kusum v/s Kamata, 1965, it said that the definition of cruelty is wide that it includes both
physical and mental type of cruelty.
was so
Praveen Mehta v/s Indrajeet Mehta, 2002, the Supreme Court said that Mental Cruelty is state of a
mind and feelings. In this case, wife refused intercourse form thefirst.day after marriage. She also
refused to undergo medical examination. She used to misbehavealwayswith her husband. She also left
her matrimonial home. Court held it to be cruelty by wife
towardshosband.
Rakesh Sharma v/s Surbhi Sharma, 2002 Wife leftthevnatimonial home without the permission of
the husband. She used to charge husband with adulteryand making constant demand of dowry. Court
held it to be a conduct of mental cruelty towards húsband.
Shobha Srinivas v/s Srinivas Veranna, 2002, Court id not considered such a single act of wife as cruelty
in which the illiterate wife emotional angerthrew the Mangal Sutra.
In all, it means that cruelty is determinedby the facts and circumstances of every matter.
M E NO
T F
L E
cONVERSION
Conversion of the spouse to other religion was only for the purpose of circumventing the provision of
Section 494 ofJodipn Penol Code, 1860. Conversion to Islam by a Hindu spouse does not per se lead to
dissolutionofthe marriage. It only gives a right to the other spouse to file a petition under S.13(1(i) of
the HinduMáriage Act for divorce. Under the pristine Hindu Law as well, conversion did not operate per
se asadissolution of marriage. A Hindu spouse who ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another
religion
does not acquire any right under the Hindu Marriage Act. On the other hand, he or she exposes
himself or herself to a claim for divorce by the other spouse on the ground of such conversion. The
spouse who remains a Hindu gets a right under S.13(1)(i) of the Hindu Marriage Act to seek dissolution
of the mariage with the spouse who since the marriage ceased to be a Hindu by conversion to another
religion. The right of non converting spouse is indefeasible. The statute does not provide for any
qualification on such right of the non converting spouse. Nor does the Hindu Marriage Act state that the
conversion shall be a conversion without the consent of the other spouse in order to entitle such spouse
In Gul Mohammed V. Emperor AIR 1947 Nagpur 121, a Hindu wife was fraudulently taken away or
her to Islam. E
the accused a Mohammedan who married her according to Muslim law after converting
was held that the conversion of the Hindu wife to Mohammedan faith didnot ipso facto, dissolve tne
or
a valid contract
marriage and she could not during the life time of her former husband enter into
RpORAIED
marriage. Accordingly, the accused was convicted for adultery under Section 497
1860.
PORA
of Indian Penal code,
religion".
QN
The issueof right to the second wife has been faced by various High Courts as well as
maintenance to
have given different views depending upon the facts and
the Supreme Court, and the courts to the expression "wife" under Section
circumstances of each case, thus giving diverse interpretation
Discussed below are a few cases where courts faced the
125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
aforementioned issue.
ACADEMICAFFAIRS SECRETARIAT
*****-
hushand
who s
legaly wedded maintenance
from her
Meaning thereby. that
or
a whose
woman,marriage
martiage
whose is void or
not void isorinnull,
not
marriage nult, can claim
contravention with Section 5(i) of the Hindu
cai
A S S S , i5 not entitled to claim maintenance under Section 25 of the del:
Whereas, in the case of laxmi Boi v. Ayodhyo Prasad the Madhya Pradesh High Court presented the
wedded wife and
e and 'husband' should not be construed as only legally
SDeno, rather they should be taken to mean 'a person claiming to be a wite or d
neld that the
matrimonial courts have the power to
ese powers should also be regulate the relationship oewe es.
exercised by the courts in cases of invalid or bigamous mdi
og
A Similar view was
put forth by other high courts in other cases like Govindrao Kono
Prasod, Rajeshbhoi v. Shantobai ond Mallika v. P. Kundanlal. However, in v.
the
Leelahai the
Bombay High Court ruled that Section 25, though it implies case o Diof
the welfare a
married
Woman should not have any unnecessary inclination such that a woman, whose marriage is void, can De
Cnttied to claim
maintenance. The court also opined that it will lead to bizarre situation if a
meaning ot the expression 'wife' is not ascertained for the purpose pf aproviding maintenance under unitorm
Section 125 of Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973.
nere are some cases where an innocent woman is conned into.marrying a previously married man and
the wife has to
suffer, since she being an illegitimate wife cannot
claim maintenance. The Supreme
Court in Bakulbai v.
Gangaram and Yamunabai v. Anantrao)decided
in keeping with settled law and
held that, a woman, who stands
as a second wife to aman
the second
who already a living spouse at the time of
has
marriage is not sanctioned the right fo maintenance. Even if the wife is unaware of the
subsistence of the previous marriage, she
125 of CrPC, it has to be shown that
has no claim. For the purpose of maintenance under Section
the couplehas
been living as husband and wife. Then the court
presumes them to be a legally wedded couple This can be disproved by producing sufficient evidence
that the marriage is not valid but void
Thus, in such situations no relief can be granted under Section
125
In some cases the couple continues'to live as husband and wife for many years. In such cases, courts
have adopted a liberal, apd hota conservative approach towards interpreting the word wife' and have
directed the husband to paqt maintenance to his wife in such situations. In Narinder Pal Kaur Chawla
v.Manjeet Singh Cháwla,the husband did not disclose the fact of his previous marriage to his wife and
subsequently married thié appellant and they remained as husband and wife for a substantive period of
time. The Delh High Court opined that a second wife, whose marriage is illegitimate, has a right to be
maintained bodersection 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act 1956 because this is such a
case where,M. maintenance is not provided to the wife, it would act as an encouragement to the
resppndetin defrauding the second wife.
Ifa man and woman have been living together for a considerable period of time, even if they are illicitly
married, then such woman is entitled to claim maintenance. Strict proof of marriage need not be a pre-
condition for maintenance. Any proof like joint bank account, any police complaint, voters 1D given
wherein the husband referred to the second wife as his wife, may be used to prove her status as a wife.
With regard to the matter of defrauding her by not mentioning his previous marriage, the appellant can
sue the husband for committing bigamy under the law provided in the Indlan Penal Code.
second marriage when his or her first spouse is still alive. In a decided case, the second wife
filed a
pettion. Both the husband and the first wife had been dead. The second wife filed an application for a
family pension, but the plea was rejected by the government. She approached the high court we
application was dismissed on the grounds that a second wife is not entitled to a claim over famiy
pension of a government employee.
InRamesh Chandra v. V R. Daga the Supreme Court has discussed the morality of matrimonia rimoni
relationships. The honorable court has observed that, though a bigamous marriage is considered,ega
and cannot attract the provisions of granting maintenance to the wife, it cannot be said.to be immora
so as to deny the right of maintenance to the wife. Also, in the case of Vidyadhari v. Sukharana Ba
where a wife was duped into an invalid marriage, the court has granted partial relief to her.
DISCuss the differences between Judicial Separation' and 'Divorce' under the Hindu Marriage Act
1955
A Decree Absolute of Divorce brings a marriage to an end and Judicial separation does not. However, it
tis more than a husband and wife living apart. A Decree of Judicial separation can be sought on one o
has
the five facts that are available for divorce but it is to prove that the marriage
not necessary
irretrievably broken down.?
Divorce there two Decrees: Decree Nisi Judicial Separation there is onee
and,Decree Absolute. In
2In are
than a Divorce, suchas one or both of them having religious beliefs or the parties not having been
married for the reqaiaite one year required for a Divorce.2
NCE
Deen passed. Passing of a decree in the main proceeding does not put an end to the courts jurisdiction
ds
Itretains the power to pass orders in respect of custody, maintenance and education of the children
e n ater passing such decree. The guiding principle for passing such orders is but approval things "Just
a proper the interpretation which has been given to these words "welfare of the minor Though the
Provided that the application with respect to the maintenance and education of the minor children,
pending the proceeding for obtainingsuch.decree, shall as far as possible, be disposed of within sixty
days from the date of service of notice-on the respondent.
Despite the amendméntsbrought in the Civil Procedure Code in 1976, providing a special procedure to
be adopted in suitsor pfoceedings relating to family matters, there was not much change in the way
these cases wefe litigated and decided.
The neegwas,therefore, felt for altogether separate courts to deal with these matters so that the
disputescould be settled speedily with emphasis on conciliation and as many families could be saved
Therefore, the Family Courts Act was passed in 1984, which provided for the establishment of Family
Courts by the State Governments.
ne proceedingsis in a
Court
Family Court can be held in camera if the Court thinks it proper. Before a Family
no party necessarily to be represented by a legal practitioner.
The provision is there to simplify the proceeding and keep unnecessary
possible. The appeal from the Family Court lies in the High Court both on facts and law.
legality out of process as far as