Taxation
Taxation
Indian Taxation History As we all know that evolution means the process of developing by gradual changes. Taxation history in India as it stands today has developed
over the years since ancient times to modern day tax laws. The first Income tax Act was introduced in India in Feb 1860 by James Wilson who was India’s first Finance
Minister under the British Rule. He also quoted the authority of Manu for levying Income Tax in India. The salient feature of the then Income Tax Act was that it
consisted of 259 sections and other salient features of the Act were as under:-
A tax was imposed on each one of these sources. The exemption limit for the general public was fixed at Rs. 200, against the exemption limit of Rs. 4980 to the
military and the police officials, and Rs. 2100 for the naval and marine officers. Agricultural income was subject to tax. The rate of tax was 2 percent for income
between rs. 200 and Rs. 499 and over that, 4 percent, out of the 4 percent charge 1 percent was to be retained by the provincial Governments and 3 percent was to
go to the Central Government. Compulsory returns were required to be submitted by all who were liable to tax. The administration of the tax was left in the hands of
the land revenue officers except in Calcutta and the financial year commenced on 1st of August, 1860.” In addition to above certain other taxes were levied like
Custom tax, Salt tax. The Salt Tax was abolished after Salt Satyagrah started after Dandi March by Mahatma Gandhi. Urban local bodies’ taxation was brought by Lord
Rippon in 1882 which was aimed at decentralization which gave power to municipal taxes for development and infrastructure of local areas. The Act of 1860 was
revised in 1886 to improve on some categories for which tax can be levied. The next important revision was in the form of Income Tax Act 1922 which was very
important because it was only then that Income Tax Department came into existence. After independence the Indian Income Tax Act 1961 came into existence after
consultation with the Ministry of Law effective from 1st April 1962. This Act was amended from time to time through Union Budgets and amendments Acts. It is
noteworthy that in the tax history of India at one time the rate of personal income tax was as high as 97.5 percent which has gradually been brought down to 30
percent with additional surcharges etc which varied from time to time. The rate of tax at 30% is lower even than some advanced countries in the world. The corporate
taxes has also been reduced considerably upto 15% for certain categories of corporate tax payers.
What are the Constitutional Provisions Relating to Taxation?
The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land and all laws in India must be consistent with its provisions. The constitutional provisions relating to taxation
in India are contained in Articles 265 to 289 of the Constitution of India. These articles outline the powers of the Union and the States to levy taxes, as well as the
procedures for assessing and collecting taxes.
Some of the key constitutional provisions relating to taxation include:
Article 265: This article states that no tax can be levied or collected except by the authority of law. This means that all taxes must be imposed by a valid law and that
no tax can be levied or collected without the authority of law.
Articles 268 to 270: These articles deal with the levy of duties of customs, excise and other taxes on goods imported into or exported out of India. These taxes are
levied by the Union government and the proceeds are shared between the Union and the States.
Article 286: This article restricts the power of the States to levy taxes on goods and services that are imported into or exported out of India. This is to prevent States
from taxing goods that are in transit between different States.
Articles 276 and 277: These articles deal with taxes that can be levied by the States for the benefit of the State or for the benefit of a municipality, district board or
other local authority. These taxes are known as “cess” taxes and they can be levied on a variety of subjects, such as professions, trades, callings and employment.
Articles 271 and 279: These articles deal with taxes that can be levied by the Union and the States concurrently. This means that both the Union and the States can
levy taxes on the same subject, but the Union government has the power to override any State law that conflicts with a Union law.
Articles 273, 275, 274 and 282: These articles deal with grants-in-aid that can be given by the Union government to the States. These grants are given to help the
States meet their financial needs and they can be used for a variety of purposes, such as education, health and infrastructure development.
The constitutional provisions relating to taxation are complex and have been interpreted by the courts in a number of cases. However, these provisions provide the
basic framework for the taxation system in India.
Article 265
Without the ‘authority of law,’ no taxes can be collected is what this article means in simple terms. The law here means only a statute law or an act of the legislature.
The law when applied should not violate any other constitutional provision. This article acts as an armour instrument for arbitrary tax extraction.
In the case Tangkhul v. Simirei Shailei, all the villagers were paying Rs 50 a day to the head man in place of a custom to render free a day’s labour. This was done every
year and the practice had been continuing for generations. The Court, in this case, held that the amount of Rs. 50 was like a collection of tax and no law had
authorized it, and therefore it violated Art 265. Article 265 is infringed every time the law does not authorize the tax imposed.
In the case, Lord Krishna Sugar Mills v. UOI, sugar merchants had to meet some export targets in a promotion scheme started by the government but if they fell short
of the targets then an additional excise duty was to be levied on the shortfall. The court intervened here and said that the government had no authority of law to
collect this additional excise tax. What this means in effect is that the government on its own cannot levy this tax by itself because it has not been passed by the
Parliament.
Article 266
This article has provisions for the Consolidated Funds and Public Accounts of India and the States. In this matter, the law is that subject to the provisions of Article
267 and provisions of Chapter 1 (part XII), the whole or part of the net proceeds of certain taxes and duties to States, all loans raised by the Government by the issue
of treasury bills, all money received by the Government in repayment of loans, all revenues received by the Government of India, and loans or ways and means of
advances shall form one consolidated fund to be entitled the Consolidated Fund of India. The same holds for the revenues received by the Government of a State
where it is called the Consolidated Fund of the State. Money out of the Consolidated Fund of India or a State can be taken only in agreement with the law and for the
purposes and as per the Constitution.
Article 268
This gives the duties levied by the Union government but are collected and claimed by the State governments such as stamp duties, excise on medicinal and toilet
preparations which although are mentioned in the Union List and levied by the Government of India but collected by the state (these duties collected by states do not
form a part of the Consolidated Fund of India but are with the state only) within which these duties are eligible for levy except in union territories which are collected
by the Government of India.
Article 269 provides the list of various taxes that are levied and collected by the Union and the manner of distribution and assignment of Tax to States. In the case
of M/S. Kalpana Glass Fibre Pvt. Ltd. Maharashtra v. State of Orissa and Others, placing faith in a judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Gannon Dunkerley & Co.
and others v. State of Rajasthan and others, the advocate from the appellant side submitted that to arrive at a Taxable Turnover, turnover relating to inter-State
transactions, export, import under the CST Act are to be excluded. Thus, the provision of the State Sales Tax Act is always subject to the provisions of Sections 3 and 5
of the CST Act. Sale or purchase in the course of interstate trade or commerce and levy and collection of tax thereon is prohibited by Article 269 of the Constitution of
India.
Article 269(A)
This article is newly inserted which gives the power of collection of GST on inter-state trade or commerce to the Government of India i.e. the Centre and is named
IGST by the Model Draft Law. But out of all the collecting by Centre, there are two ways within which states get their share out of such collection
1. Direct Apportionment (let say out of total net proceeds 42% is directly apportioned to states).
2. Through the Consolidated Fund of India (CFI). Out of the whole amount in CFI a selected prescribed percentage goes to the States.
Article 270
This Article gives provision for the taxes levied and distributed between the Union and the States:
All taxes and duties named within the Union List, except the duties and taxes named in articles 268, 269 and 269A, separately.
Taxes and surcharges on taxes, duties, and cess on particular functions which are specified in Article 271 under any law created by Parliament are
extracted by the Union Government.
It is distributed between the Union and the States as mentioned in clause (2).
The proceeds from any tax/duty levied in any financial year, is assigned to the states where this tax/duty is extractable in that year but it doesn’t form a
part of the Consolidated Fund of India.
Any tax collected by the centre should also be divided among the centre and states as provided in clause (2).
With the introduction of GST 2 sub-clauses having been added to this Article- Article 270(1A) and Article 20(1B7).
The Supreme Court of India has set a famous judicial precedent under Article 270 of the Constitution of India in the case T.M. Kanniyan v. I.T.O. The SC, in this case,
propounded that the Income-tax collected forms a part of the Consolidated Fund of India. The Income-tax thus extracted cannot be distributed between the centre,
union territories, and states which are under Presidential rule.
Article 271
At times the Parliament for the Union Government (only when such a requirement arises), decides to increase any of the taxes /duties mentioned in article 269 and
Article 270 by levying an additional surcharge on them and the proceeds from them form a part of the Consolidated Fund of India. Article 271 is an exception to
Article 269 and Article 270. The collection of the surcharge is also done by the Union and the State has no role to play in it.
Cess and surcharge
There seems to be a lot of confusion between cess and surcharge. Cess is described in Article 270 of the Constitution of India. Cess is like a fee imposed for a
particular purpose that the legislation charging it decides. Article 271 deals with a surcharge which is nothing but an additional tax on the existing tax collected by the
union for a particular purpose. Proceeds from both the cess and surcharge form part of the Consolidated Fund of India In the case of m/s SRD Nutrients Private
Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Guwahati, the Supreme Court was presented with the question: If on excisable goods an education cess can be levied
before the imposition of cess on goods manufactured but cleared after imposition of such cess. The judgement given in this case was in favour of the manufacturer
but the judges, Justice A K Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan observed that education and higher education cess are surcharges.
Grants-in-aid
The constitution has provisions for sanctioning grants to the states or other federating units. It is Central Government financial assistance to the states to
balance/correct/adjust the financial requirements of the units when the revenue proceeds go to the centre but the welfare measures and functions are entrusted to
the states. These are charged to the Consolidated Fund of India and the authority to grant is with the Parliament.
Article 273
This grant is charged to the Consolidated Fund of India every year in place of any share of the net proceeds, export duty on products of jute to the states of Assam,
Bihar, Orissa, and West Bengal. This grant will continue and will be charged to the Consolidated Fund of India as long as the Union government continues to levy
export duty on jute, or products of jute or the time of expiration which is 10 years from its commencement.
Article 275
These grants are sanctioned as the parliament by law decides to give to those states which are in dire need of funds and assistance in procuring these funds. These
funds /grants are mainly used for the development of the state and for the widening of the welfare measures/schemes undertaken by the state government. It is also
used for social welfare work for the Scheduled tribes in their areas.
Article 276
This article talks about the taxes that are levied by the state government, governed by the state government and the taxes are collected also by the state
government. But the taxes levied are not uniform across the different states and may vary. These are sales tax and VAT, professional tax and stamp duty to name a
few.
Article 277
Except for cesses, fees, duties or taxes which were levied immediately before the commencement of the constitution by any municipality or other local body for the
purposes of the State, despite being mentioned in the Union List can continue to be levied and applied for the same purposes until a new law contradicting it has
been passed by the parliament.
In the case Hyderabad Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, the appellant was manufacturing medicines for making which they had to
use alcohol, the licenses for which were procured under the Hyderabad Abkari Act and had to pay some fees to the State Government for the supervision. But the
parliament passed the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations Act, 1955 under which no fee had to be paid but the petitioner challenged the levy of taxes by the state after
the passing of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations Act, 1955 because according to Article 277, entry 84 of list 1 in the 7th schedule, the state could not levy any fee.
The difference between tax and fee was explained. Proceeds from tax collection are used for the benefit of all the taxpayers but a fee collected is used only for a
specific purpose.
Article 279
This article deals with the calculation of “net proceeds” etc. Here ‘net proceeds’ means the proceeds which are left after deducting the cost of collection of the tax,
ascertained and certified by the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India.
Article 282
It is normally meant for special, temporary or ad hoc schemes and the power to grant sanctions under it is not restricted. In the case Bhim Singh v. Union of India &
Ors the Supreme Court said that from the time of the applicability of the Constitution of India, welfare schemes have been there intending to advance public welfare
and for public purposes by grants which have been disbursed by the Union Government. In this case, the Scheme was MPLAD (Member of Parliament Local Area
Development Scheme) and it falls within the meaning of ‘public purpose’ to fulfil the development and welfare projects undertaken by the state as reflected in the
Directive Principles of State Policy but subject to fulfilling the constitutional requirements. Articles 275 and 282 are sources of granting funds under the Constitution.
Article 282 is normally meant for special, temporary or ad hoc schemes and the power to grant sanctions under it is not restricted. In the case Cf. Narayanan
Nambudripad, Kidangazhi Manakkal v. State of Madras, the Supreme Court held that the practice of religion is a private purpose. And donations and endowments
made are therefore not a state affair unless the state takes the responsibility of the management of such religious endowment for a public purpose and uses the
funds for public welfare measures. So it can be seen that Article 282 can be used for a public purpose but at times in the name of public purpose it can even be
misused.
Article 286
This article restricts the power of the State to tax
1) The state cannot exercise taxation on imports/exports nor can it impose taxes outside the territory of the state.
2) Only parliament can lay down principles to ascertain when a sale/purchase takes place during export or import or outside the state. (Sections 3, 4, 5 of the Central
Sales Tax Act, 1956 have been constituted with these powers)
3) Taxes on sale/purchase of goods that are of special importance can be restricted by the parliament and the State Government can levy taxes on these goods of
special importance subject to these restrictions (Section 14 and Section 15 of Central Sales Act, 1956 have been constituted to impose restrictions on the state
Government to levy taxes on these goods of special importance). In the case of K. Gopinath v. the State of Kerala, Cashew nuts were purchased and imported by the
Cashew Corporation of India from African suppliers and sold by it to local users after processing it. The apex court held that this sale was not in the course of import
and did not come under an exemption of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The issue before the court was to decide whether the purchases of raw cashew nuts from
African suppliers made by the appellants from the cashew corporation of India) fall under the nature of import and, therefore protected from liability to tax under
Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. The judgement here went against the appellants.
Article 289
State Governments are exempted from Union taxation as regards their property and income but if there is any law made by the parliament in this regard then the
Union can impose the tax to such extent.
Some other tax-related provisions
1. Article 301 which states that trade, commerce and inter-course are exempted from any taxation throughout India except for the provisions mentioned
in Article 302, 303, and 304 of the Indian Constitution, 1949.
2. Article 302 empowers the parliament to impose restrictions on trade and commerce in view of public interest.
3. Article 303– Whenever there is the scarcity of goods this article comes in play. Discrimination against the different State Governments is not permitted
under the law except when there is a scarcity of goods in a particular state and this preference to that state can be made only by the Parliament and in
keeping with the law.
4. Article 304– permits a State Government to impose taxes on goods imported from other States and Union Territories but it cannot discriminate
between goods from within the State and goods from outside the State. The State can also exercise the power to impose some restrictions on freedom
of trade and commerce within its territory.
Article 366
Apart from all these provisions, there are other provisions also that require mention such as Article 366 which gives the definition of:
Goods;
Services;
Taxation;
State;
Taxes that are levied on the sale/purchase of goods;
Goods and service tax etc.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TAX, FEES AND CESS
FEE TAX
There must be actual quid pro quo for a fee has undergone a sea A tax is levied as a part of a common burden
changed
While a fee is for payment of a specific benefit or privilege although If the element of revenue for general purpose of the State
the special to the primary purpose of regulation in public interest. predominates, the levy becomes a tax.
In regard to fee, there is and must always be, correlation between the
fee collected and the service intended to be rendered.
The power to levy tax or fee is not coextensive with each other and different meanings have been ascribed to the term ‘fee’ and ‘tax’. Initial judgments of the Hon’ble
Supreme Court have carved ‘quid pro quo test’ between the fees collected and the services rendered to identify fees from tax. Tax was considered to be a general
burden for public welfare whereas levy of fee corelates to expenses incurred by the government in rendering a service. The fees collected were to be kept in a
separate funds and not to be added to the Consolidated Fund.
Basis Tax Cess
- Tax is a mandatory charge levied by the tax authority to generate government revenue. But cess is collected by the authority (generally by local government) to raise
fund for specific purpose.
- Scope of tax is wider than cess because cess is only a kind of tax.
UNIT 2
Income: [Sec. 2(24)]
The definition of ‘Income’ given under section 2(24) is inclusive and not exhaustive and therefore it may be possible that certain items may be considered as income
under this Act according to its general and natural meaning, even if it is not included under section 2(24). The term ‘Income’ includes the following:
Profits and gains;
Dividend;
Voluntary contributions received by a trust which is created wholly or partly for charitable or religious purposes; or by educational institutions, hospitals or electoral
trust;
The value of any perquisite or profit in lieu of salary taxable u/s 17;
Any special allowance granted to the assessee to meet expenses wholly, necessarily and exclusively for the performance of office or employment duties;
The value of any benefit or perquisite, whether converted into money or not, obtained from a company either by a director or by a person who has substantial
interest in the company or by a relative of the director or such person, and any sum paid by any such company in respect of any obligation which, otherwise, would
have been payable by the director or other person aforesaid;
The value of benefit or perquisite to a representative assessee like a trustee appointed under a trust;
Any sum chargeable to income-tax under clauses (ii) and (iii) of sec. 28 or sec. 41 or sec. 59;
Any sum chargeable to income-tax under clauses (iiia), (iiib), (iiic), (iv), (v), (va) and (via) of sec. 28;
Any capital gains chargeable u/s 45;
The profits and gains of any insurance business carried on by a mutual insurance company or by a co-operative society, computed in accordance with section 44 or
any surplus taken to be such profit and gains by virtue of provisions contained in the First Schedule;
The profits and gains of any of banking business (including providing credit facilities) carried on by a co-operative society with its members;
Winnings from lottery, crossword puzzles, races (including horse races), card games or other games of any sort or from gambling or betting;
Any sum received by the assessee from his employees as contributions to any provident fund or superannuation fund or any fund set up under Employees’ State
Insurance Act, 1948 or any fund for the welfare of such employee; [Sec. 2(24)(x)]
Any amount received under the Keyman insurance policy including the sum allocated by way of bonus; [Sec. 2(24)(xi)]
Any sum chargeable to income-tax u/s 56(2)(v), (vi);
Any sum of money or specified movable or immovable properties received without consideration or inadequate consideration as provided u/s 56(2)(vii), (via);
Any consideration received for issue of shares as exceeds the FMV of shares referred to in section 56(2)(viib);
Any sum of money received as advance in the course of negotiation for transfer of a capital asset, if such sum is forfeited as the negotiation do not resulted in transfer
of the asset 56(2)(ix);
Any sum chargeable to income-tax u/s 56(2)(x);
Any compensation or other payment referred to in Sec. 56(2)(xi);
Income shall include assistance received in the form of a subsidy or grant or cash incentive or duty drawback or waiver or concession or reimbursement (by whatever
name called) from the Central Government or a State Government or any other authority or body or agency in cash or kind to the assessee other than:
(a) the subsidy or grant or reimbursement which is taken into account for determination of the actual cost of the asset in accordance with the provisions
of Explanation 10 to clause (1) of section 43,
(b) the subsidy or grant by the Central Government for the purpose of the corpus of a trust or institution established by the Central Government or the State
Government, as the case may be.
Previous year: [Sec. 3]
The year in which income is earned, i.e. the financial year immediately preceding the assessment year, is called the previous year and the tax shall be paid on such
income in the next year which is called the assessment year. This means that the tax is levied on the income in the year in which it is earned; referred as previous year
and the tax on such income will be paid in the assessment year. All assessees are required to follow a uniform previous year i.e. the financial year starting from
1st April and ending on 31st March.
Assessment year: [Sec. 2(9)]
Assessment year means a period of 12 months commencing on 1st April every year. The total income earned by the assessee during the previous year shall be
chargeable to tax in the next year; which is termed as the assessment year. For example, for the previous year 2023-24, the relevant assessment year shall be 2024-
25 (1.4.2024 to 31.3.2025).
Person: [Sec. 2(31)]
As the income tax is levied on the total income of the previous year of every ‘person’, it becomes important to understand the term ‘Person’. The term ‘person’
includes the following seven categories:
(i) an individual,
(ii) a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF),
(iii) a company,
(iv) a firm,
(v) an Association of Persons (AoP) or a Body of Individuals (BoI), whether incorporated or not,
(vi) a local authority, and
(vii) every artificial juridical person not falling within any of the preceding sub-clauses e.g., a university or deity.
As per Explanation to Sec. 2(31), an AoP/BoI/Local authority or any artificial juridical person shall be deemed to be a person, irrespective of whether they were
formed or established with the purpose of earning or deriving profits or not.
6. Assessee: [Sec. 2(7)]
Assessee means a person by whom any tax or any other sum of money is payable under this Act. It also includes the following:
(i) Every person in respect of whom any proceeding under this Act has been taken for the assessment of his income;
(ii) Every person who is deemed to be an assessee under any provisions of this Act. Sometimes, a person becomes assessable in respect of the income of some other
persons. In such case also, he is considered as an assessee. For example, legal representative of a deceased person;
(iii) Every person who is deemed to be an assessee in default under any provision of this Act. For example, where a person making any payment to other person is
liable to deduct tax at source, and if he has not deducted tax at source or has deducted but not deposited the tax with the government; he shall be deemed to be an
assessee in default.
Income Tax Law
Income-tax is a tax levied on the total income of an assessee, being a person charged under the provisions of this Act, for the relevant previous year.
For understanding Income tax law in India, the following components need to be studied carefully:
(1) Income-tax Act, 1961
(2) Annual Finance Acts
(3) Income-tax Rules, 1962
(4) Notification and Circulars, issued from time to time
(5) Judicial Decisions
1.1 Income-tax Act, 1961
The levy of income-tax in India is governed by the Income-tax Act, 1961 which extends to whole of India and came into force on 1 st April, 1962. The Act contains 298
sections and XIV schedules. It contains provisions for determination of taxable income, tax liability, assessment procedures, appeals, penalties and prosecutions.
These undergo changes every year with additions and deletions brought by the Annual Finance Act passed by the Parliament.
1.2 Annual Finance Acts
Every year, Finance Bill is introduced by the Finance Minister of the Government of India in the Parliament’s Budget Session. When the Finance Bill is passed by both
the Houses of the Parliament and gets the assent of the President, it becomes the Finance Act. Amendments are made every year to the Income-tax Act, 1961 and
other tax laws by the Finance Act. Finance Bill also mentions the Rates of Income tax and other taxes given in various schedules which are attached to it. Therefore,
though Income-tax Act is a settled law, the operative effect is given by the Annual Finance Act.
1.3 Income-tax Rules, 1962
Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) looks after the administration of direct taxes and is empowered u/s 295 of the Income Tax Act, to make rules for carrying out the
purposes of the Act and thereby it frames various rules from time to time for the proper administration of the Income-tax Act, 1961. These rules were first framed in
1962 and are thereby collectively called Income-tax Rules, 1962. It is important to read these rules along with the Income-tax Act, 1961. The power to make rules
under this section shall also include the power to give retrospective effect, but not earlier than the date of commencement of this Act. However, such retrospective
effect shall not be given so as to prejudicially affect the interests of the assessees.
1.4 Circulars and Notifications
Circulars are issued by the CBDT from time to time to deal with certain specific problems and to clarify doubts regarding the scope and meaning of the provisions.
These circulars are issued for the guidance of the officers and/or assessees. These circulars are binding on the department and not on the assessee and therefore the
assessee can take advantage of beneficial circulars.
Notifications are issued by the Central Government to give effect to the provisions of the Act. For example, u/s 10(15)(iv)(h), interest on bonds and debentures are
exempt by the Central Government subject to such conditions through Notifications. The CBDT is also empowered to make and amend rules for the purposes of the
Act by issue of notifications. For example, u/s 35CCD, the CBDT is empowered to prescribe guidelines for notification of skill development project.
1.5 Judicial Decisions
Judicial decisions are an important and unavoidable part of the study of income-tax law. For the Parliament, it is not possible to provide for all possible issues that
may arise in the implementation of any Act and hence the judiciary will have to consider various cases between the assessees and the department and give
decisions on various issues. The Supreme Court is the Apex Court of the country and the law laid down by the Supreme Court is the law of the land. In case, where
the apparently contradictory decisions are given by benches having similar number of judges, the principle of the later decision would be applicable. The decisions
given by various High Courts will apply in the respective states in which such High Courts have jurisdiction.
Total Income
Total Income is defined under Section 2(45) with the scope defined by Section 5 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
If you are an Indian resident in the previous year, any income received, accrued or deemed to be received by you will be accounted for
If you are not ordinarily resident in the previous year, incomes arising out of India will be included only if they are from a business controlled or performed from India
In the case of non-residents (NRI), only incomes arising or accruing in India will be counted
Total Income is arrived by deducting all eligible deductions from “Gross Total Income”
Your tax liability will be estimated on the Total Income. In simple terms, you pay tax on your Total Income.
– Standard deduction
Taxable Income under the head ‘Income from House Property’ ……..
Add: Amounts debited to P & L A/c but are not allowable as deduction under the Act ……..
Add: Amounts not credited to P & L A/c but are taxable under the head PGBP ……..
Less: Amounts credited to P & L A/c but are exempt u/s 10 or are taxable under other heads of income ……..
Less: Amounts not debited to P & L A/c but are allowable as deduction under the Act ……..
Taxable Income under the head ‘Profits and Gains of Business and Profession’ ……..
4. Capital Gains
Less: Exemption u/ss 54, 54B, 54D, 54EC, 54EE, 54F, 54G, 54GA, 54GB, 54H ……..
Taxable Income under the head ‘Income from other sources’ ……..
Total [1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5] ……..
Less: Rebate u/s 87A (Available if resident individual is having net taxable income of ` 5,00,000 or less) ……..
Even genuine gifts extended to your kith and kin could have these income tax implications. It will help you immensely if you get some insights on the clubbing
provisions under the Indian income tax law. Hence, let us understand these provisions a little more in detail.
Clubbing of Income
As the term suggests, clubbing of income means adding or including the income of another person (mostly family members) to one’s own income. This is allowed
under Section 64 of the IT Act. However, certain restrictions pertaining to specified person(s) and specified scenarios are mandated to discourage this practice.
Specified Persons to Club Income
Income of any and every person cannot be clubbed on a random basis while computing total income of an individual and also not all income of specified person can
be clubbed. As per Section 64, there are only certain specified income of specified persons which can be clubbed while computing total income of an individual.
Specified Scenarios to Club Income
Section 60 Any person Transferring income without transferring Any income from such asset will be clubbed in
asset either by way of an agreement or the hands of the tranferor
any other way,
Section 61 Any person Transferring asset on the condition that it Any income from such asset will be clubbed in
can be revoked the hands of the transferor
Section Minor child Any income arising or accruing to your Income will be clubbed in the hands of higher
64(1A) minor child where child includes both earning parent. Note: If the marriage of the
step child and adopted child. The clubbing child’s parents does not subsist, income shall be
provisions apply even to minor married clubbed in the income of that parent who
daughter. maintains the minor child in the previous year.
If a minor child’s income is clubbed in the hands
of parent, then an exemption of Rs. 1,500 is
allowed to the parent (This is applicable only if
the parent opts for the old tax regime).
Exceptions to clubbing
Income of a disabled child (disability of the
nature specified in section 80U)
Income earned by manual work done by the
child or by activity involving the application of
his skill and talent or specialised knowledge and
experience
Income earned by a major child. This would also
include income earned from investments made
out of money gifted to the adult child. Also,
money gifted to an adult child is exempt
from gift tax under gifts to ‘relative’.
Section Spouse** If your spouse receives any remuneration Income shall be clubbed in the hands of the
64(1)(ii) irrespective of its nomenclature, such as taxpayer or spouse, whose income is greater
Salary, commission, fees or any other (before clubbing).
form and by any mode, i.e., cash or in An exception to clubbing: Clubbing is not
kind from any concern in which you have allowable if spouse possesses technical or
substantial interest* professional qualifications in relation to any
income arising to the spouse, and such income
is solely attributable to the application of
his/her technical or professional knowledge and
experience.
Section Spouse** Direct or indirect transfer of assets to Income from out of such asset is clubbed in the
64(1)(iv) your spouse by you for inadequate hands of the transferor. Provided the asset is
consideration other than the house property. Exceptions to
clubbing of income in the following cases:
a. Where the asset is received as part of divorce
settlement
b. If assets are transferred before marriage,
c. No husband and wife relationship subsists on
the date of accrual of income.
d. The asset is acquired by the spouse out of pin
money (i.e. an allowance given to the wife by
her husband for her personal and usual
household expenses)
64(1)(vi) Daughter-in- Transfer of assets transferred directly or Any income from such assets transferred is
law indirectly to your daughter in-law by you clubbed in the hands of the transferor
for inadequate consideration
64(1)(vii) Any person or Transferring any assets directly or directly Income from such assets will be considered as
association of for an inadequate consideration to any your income and clubbed in your hands
person person or association of persons to
benefit your daughter in-law either
immediately or on deferred basis
64(1)(viii) Any person or Transferring any assets directly or directly Income from such assets will be considered as
association of for an inadequate consideration to any your income and clubbed in your hands
person person or association of persons to
benefit your spouse either immediately or
on deferred basis
Section Hindu In case, a member of HUF transfers his Income from such converted property shall be
64(2) Undivided individual property to HUF for inadequate clubbed in the hands of individual
Family consideration or converts such property
into HUF property
*An individual is said to have the substantial interest in the concern if–
In case of a company, individual either by himself or along with his relative/s beneficially owns shares having 20% or more voting power (not being shares
entitled to a fixed rate of dividend whether with or without a further right to participate in profits)
In any other case, such individual either alone or along with his relative/s is entitled to 20% or more of profits in the aggregate of such concern at any time
during the previous year.
**Income from reinvestment of clubbed income by a spouse is not clubbed in the hands of individual.
Examples on Clubbing of Income
Example 1
Mr P owns a shop which fetches a rent of Rs.12,000 per month. He transfers the rent to his friend Mr Q but retains the ownership of the shop.
In this case, because Mr P has transferred the income without transferring the asset. Hence, as per section 60 of the income tax act, Mr P must include the rental
income while computing his total income.
How to avoid Clubbing of Income ?
Now we have explained the provision where transaction which are considered under clubbing of income , Let's explain some of unique ways you can plan your taxes
without clubbing of Income provision
Transfer of amount to Parents and Interest earned on such investment : Any amount transferred to your Parents as a Gift will not be taxable in the hands of
your Parents and lets say such amount is invested in a Fixed Deposit , Interest on such FD will continue to be taxed in the hands of Parents and clubbing
provision will not be applicable
Gift Received at the time of Marriage : Any gift received during the time of marriage will not be taxable in the hands of the recipient and thus any income
arising on such investment will continue to be taxed in the hands of the recipient.
Investment in PPF : Since interest earned on PPF is exempt income , Even if you invest in PPF in the name of your Spouse or Minor child , Interest will not be
taxable. Thus clubbing provision became irrelevant.
Since there is an investment cap of Rs 150,000 per individual in PPF , You can open multiple PPF accounts in the name of your Spouse or Minor child to get this
benefit.
What Is Tax Planning?
Tax planning is the process of analysing a financial plan or a situation from a tax perspective. The objective of tax planning is to make sure there is tax efficiency. With
the help of tax planning, one can ensure that all elements of a financial plan can function together with maximum tax-efficiency. Tax planning is a significant
component of a financial plan. Reducing tax liability and increasing the ability to make contributions towards retirement plans are critical for success.
Tax planning comprises various considerations. Considerations such as size, the timing of income, timing of purchases, and planning are concerned with other kinds of
expenditures. Also, the chosen investments and the various retirement plans should go hand-in-hand with the tax filing status as well as the deductions in order to
create the best possible outcome.
Understanding Tax Planning
Tax planning plays an important role in the financial growth story of every individual as tax payments are compulsory for all individuals who fall under the IT bracket.
With tax planning, one will be able to streamline his/her tax payments such that he or she will receive considerable returns over a specific period of time involving
minimum risk. Also, effective tax planning will help in reducing a person's tax liability.
Tax planning can be classified into the following:
1. Permissive tax planning: Tax planning which falls under the framework of the law.
2. Purposive tax planning: Tax planning with a specific objective.
3. Long-range/short-range tax planning: Planning executed at the beginning and towards the end of the fiscal year.
Highlights of tax planning:
1. Tax planning is the process of analysing finances from a tax angle, with an aim to ensure maximum tax efficiency.
2. Considerations concerning tax planning will include timing of income, timing of purchases, planning for expenditures, and size.
3. Tax planning is vital for small as well as large businesses since it will be helpful for achieving business-related goals.
Income Tax Slabs FY 2023-24 & AY 2024-25 (New & Old Regime Tax Rates)
The income tax slabs are different under the old and the new tax regimes. Further, the slab rates under the old tax regime are divided into three categories
Indian Residents aged < 60 years + All the non-residents
60 to 80 years: Resident Senior citizens
More than 80 years: Resident Super senior citizens
What Is an Income Tax Slab?
In India, the Income Tax applies to individuals based on a slab system, where different tax rates are assigned to different income ranges. As the person's income
increases, the tax rates also increase. This type of taxation allows for a fair and progressive tax system in the country. The income tax slabs are revised periodically,
typically during each budget. These slab rates vary for different groups of taxpayers.
Let us take a look at all the slab rates applicable for FY 2023-24(AY 2024-25).
Income Tax Slab Rates For FY 2022-23 (AY 2023-24)
a. New Tax regime until 31st March 2023
Up to Rs 2,50,000 Nil
Rs 2,50,001 - Rs 5,00,000* 5%
* Tax rebate up to Rs.12,500 is applicable if the total income does not exceed Rs 5,00,000 (not applicable for NRIs)
Refer to the above image for the rates applicable to FY 2023-24 (AY 2024-25) for the upcoming tax filing season.
b. Old Tax regime
Income tax slabs for individuals aged below 60 years & HUF
Income Slabs Individuals of Age < 60 Years and
NRIs
Up to Rs 2,50,000 NIL
Rs 2,50,001 - Rs 5,00,000 5%
NOTE:
The income tax exemption limit is up to Rs 2,50,000 for Individuals, HUF below 60 years aged, and NRIs.
Surcharge and cess will be applicable.
Income tax slab for individuals aged above 60 years to 80 years
Up to Rs 3,00,000 NIL
Rs 3,00,001 - Rs 5,00,000 5%
NOTE:
The income tax exemption limit is up to Rs.3 lakh for senior citizens aged above 60 years but less than 80 years.
Surcharge and cess will be applicable
Income tax slab for Individuals aged more than 80 years
Up to Rs 5,00,000 NIL
NOTE:
Income tax exemption limit is up to Rs 5 lakh for super senior citizen aged above 80 years.
Surcharge and cess will be applicable
What Are 5 Heads Of Income Tax?
Income tax is a composite tax on all incomes received by, or accruing or arising to, an assessee during a previous year. For computing the taxable income, incomes
from various sources are computed under 5 different heads of income. If there are two or more sources of income falling under a head of income, the income is
computed separately for each source and then aggregated under that head. The five heads of income are: (sec 14)
Income from Salary (sec.15 to 17)
Income from House Property (sec.22 to 27)
Income from Profits and Gains from Business or Profession ( sec. 28 to 44D)
Income from Capital Gains (sec.45 to 55A)
Income from Other Sources (sec 56 to 59)
Income from Salary
Any income that you receive in terms of the service you provide on a contract of employment is applicable for taxation under this head. This includes salary, advance
salary, perquisites, gratuity, commission, annual bonus and pension.
The following section governs the Income from the Salary
Section 15 describes the taxability of income from Salary
Section 16 explains about deduction available under salaries
Section 17 explains the components of the Salary like Monetary compensation, Perquisites etc.
This tax head also includes some exemptions:
House Rent Allowance (HRA): As a salaried individual, if you live in a rented house, you can claim House Rent Allowance for partial or complete tax
exemptions.
Transport Allowance: In case of blind/deaf and dumb/orthopedically handicapped employees, you can claim allowance of Rs 1,600 per month.
Income from House Property
An individual’s income from his or her house property or land appurtenant such property is taxable under the head of income from house property. To put it simply,
this head includes the policy for calculating the tax on rental income that you receive from your properties.
Broadly Income from House Property has three sub-classifications
Self Occupied Property
Let out Property
Deemed Let out Property
In case you own more than two self-occupied house, then only two of such houses is considered to be self-occupied and the rest are considered to be deemed let out.
The taxation occurs on income received from both commercial and residential property.
Income from Profits and Gains from Business or Profession
The profits that you earn from any kind of business or profession are taxable under this head. You can subtract your expenses from the total income in order to
determine the amount on which tax is chargeable.
Here are the types of income that are chargeable under this head:
Profits generated from the sale of a certain license
Gains earned by an individual during an assessment year
The profits that an organization makes on its income
Cash received on the export of a government scheme
The benefits that a business receives
Gains, bonuses or salary that an individual receives due to a partnership with a firm.
Individual or HUF earning income from business and profession must file ITR-3 or ITR-4
Income from Capital Gains
When you earn profits by transferring or selling an asset that was held as an investment, that income is taxable under the head of income from capital gains. A large
number of assets, like gold, bonds, mutual funds, real estate, stocks, etc., fall under capital assets.
Now, you can subdivide capital gains into
Short-term capital gains and
Long-term capital gains.
Income from Other Sources
Among the five heads of income tax, this one includes any other income that does not have any mention in the above 4 heads. They fall under Section 56 sub-section
(2) of the Income-tax Act and include income from dividends, interest, rent on plant and machinery, lottery, bank deposits, gambling, card games, sports rewards,
etc.
Heads of Income vs Sources of Income
The heads of income are ways to classify the earnings or gains of an individual during a given year as per the Income Tax Act. This is necessary for taxation purposes.
They are:
Income from Salaries
Income from House Property
Profits and Gains from Profession or Business
Capital Gains
Income from other sources
On the other hand, sources of income for any person or business are monetary sources from which they can earn an income.
For individuals, they are:
Salary
Interest
Commission, etc.
In case of businesses, they are:
Returns on investments
Profits
Grants from the government and more
What is Salary under Section 17(1)?
Salary is a much broader term than what we understood. Salary is used when there is an employer-employee relationship between the payee and the payer. While
calculating the income under the head salaries, the total amount of salary, perquisites, and profits provided in place of a salary received in a financial year must be
calculated. Salary is used most frequently while filing the income tax return. All salaried individuals with income above the exemption limit must file the ITR.
Wages- Wages refer to the payment or remuneration given to an employee in exchange for their work or services rendered. It is typically paid hourly for
blue-collar jobs, such as factory workers, mechanics, or construction workers. It is fully taxable under Section 15 if received during the relevant previous
year.
Annuity or pension- An annuity or pension is amount received by an individual that provides a fixed stream of payments over a certain period, typically
after retirement. It is designed to provide a steady income to help individuals meet their financial needs in retirement. Annuity received from a present
employer is taxed as ‘Salary while the Annuity received from a previous employer is taxed as ‘Profits in lieu of Salary’.
Advance of salary- An advance of salary is a payment made by an employer to an employee before the employee's regular salary payment date. This
payment is usually made in anticipation of an employee's financial need or emergency. It is fully taxable under Section 15.
Gratuity- Gratuity is a lump-sum payment made by an employer to an employee as a token of appreciation for the employee's long and meritorious
service. It is a type of retirement benefit and is usually paid when an employee completes a certain period of service with the employer, such as 5 or 10
years. Taxed as per Section 10(10) and is exempted up to certain limits.
Fees, commissions, perquisites- Fees, commissions, and perquisites are types of income that an individual may receive as part of their employment or
business activities.
o An amount received as fees to the employee from the employer for the services rendered is included in the definition of salary.
o Any amount of commissions given to the employee for the services provided shall form part of the salary. If the employee receives a fixed
commission as a percentage of the sales or profits, it shall be considered a salary.
o Perquisites, also known as perks, are benefits or privileges provided to an employee in addition to their regular salary or wages. This is
explained more under Section 17 (2).
Profits in lieu of salary- Profits in lieu of salary refer to any payment or benefit received by an employee in connection with their employment, other than
salary or wages. This can include bonuses, commissions, incentives, allowances, or any other form of compensation not classified as salary. This is
explained more under Section 17(3).
Leave encashment- Leave encashment is a payment made to an employee in lieu of the employee taking their entitled leave. In other words, it is the
amount paid to an employee for the unutilized leave days they are entitled to.
EPF- EPF stands for Employees' Provident Fund, a retirement savings scheme for salaried employees in India. The scheme is managed and regulated by the
Employees' Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), a statutory body under the Ministry of Labour and Employment.
NPS- A contribution made by the Central Government or any other employer in a financial year in an employee’s account under National Pension Scheme
(NPS) will form part of the salary.
Transferred PF balance- The taxable portion of the transferred balance from an unrecognized provident fund to a recognized provident fund will be
considered salary.
UNIT 3
Income Tax Deductions under Section 80C to 80U
Individuals can claim tax deduction benefits for payments made towards life insurance policies, fixed deposits, superannuation/provident funds, tuition fees, and
construction/purchase of residential properties under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act.
Tax Deductions under Section 80C
Section 80C of the Income Tax Act provides provisions for tax deductions on a number of payments, with both individuals and Hindu Undivided Families eligible for
these deductions. Eligible taxpayers can claim deductions to the tune of Rs 1.5 lakh per year under Section 80C, with this amount being a combination of deductions
available under Sections 80 C, 80 CCC and 80 CCD.
Some of the popular investments which are eligible for this tax deduction are mentioned below.
Payment made towards life insurance policies (for self, spouse or children)
Payment made towards a superannuation/provident fund
Tuition fees paid to educate a maximum of two children
Payments made towards construction or purchase of a residential property
Payments issued towards a fixed deposit with a minimum tenure of 5 years
This section provides for a number of additional deductions like investment in mutual funds, senior citizens saving schemes, purchase of NABARD bonds, etc.
Section 80CCC: Section 80CCC of the Income Tax Act provides scope for tax deductions on investment in pension funds. These pension funds could be from
any insurer and a maximum deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh can be claimed under it. This deduction can be claimed only by individual taxpayers.
Section 80CCD: Section 80CCD aims to encourage the habit of savings among individuals, providing them an incentive for investing in pension schemes
which are notified by the Central Government. Contributions made by an individual and his/her employer, both are eligible for tax deduction, subject to
the deduction being less than 10% of the salary of the person. Only individual taxpayers are eligible for this deduction.
Section 80CCD (1):All individuals who have subscribed to the National Pension Scheme (NPS) will be eligible to claim tax benefits under Section 80 CCD (1)
up to the limit of Rs.1.5 lakh. In addition to that, an exclusive tax deduction for investments of up to Rs.50,000 in NPS (Tier I account) can be availed by the
subscribers under Section 80 CCD (1B).
Section 80CCF: Open to both Hindu Undivided Families and Individuals, Section 80CCF contains provisions for tax deductions on subscription of long-term
infrastructure bonds which have been notified by the government. One can claim a maximum deduction of Rs 20,000 under this Section.
Section 80CCG: Section 80CCG of the Income Tax Act permits a maximum deduction of Rs 25,000 per year, with specified individual residents eligible for
this deduction. Investments in equity savings schemes notified by the government are permitted for deductions, subject to the limit being 50% of the
amount invested.
Tax Deductions under Section 80D
Section 80D of the Income Tax Act permits deductions on amounts spent by an individual towards the premium of a health insurance policy. This includes
payment made on behalf of a spouse, children, parents, or self to a Central Government health plan.
An amount of Rs 15,000 can be claimed as a deduction when paid towards the insurance for spouse, dependent children, or self, while this amount is Rs
30,000 (Union Budget 2017) if the person is over the age of 60 years.
On February 1, 2018, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley presented the Union Budget 2018 with a few changes in the tax deductions applicable for senior
citizens. Under Section 80D, the income tax deduction limit for senior citizens has been increased to Rs.50,000 for medical expenditure.
Both individuals and Hindu Undivided Families are eligible for this deduction, subject to the payment being made in modes other than cash.
Section 80DD: Section 80DD provides provisions for tax deductions in two cases, with the permitted deduction being Rs 75,000 for normal disability and
Rs 1.25 lakh if it is a severe disability. This deduction can be claimed in case of the following expenditures.
On payments made towards the treatment of dependents with disability
Amount paid as premium to purchase or maintain an insurance policy for such dependent
The permitted deduction is Rs 75,000 for normal disability and Rs 1.25 lakh for a severe disability. Both Hindu Undivided Families and resident individuals are eligible
for this deduction. The dependant, in this case can be either a spouse, sibling, parents or children.
Section 80DDB: Section 80DDB can be utilised by HUFs and resident individuals and provides provisions for deductions on the expense incurred by an
individual/family towards medical treatment of certain diseases. The permitted deduction is limited to Rs 40,000, which can be increased to Rs 60,000
(Union Budget 2015) if the treatment is for a senior citizen.The deduction under Section 80DDB for senior citizens and very senior citizens has been
increased to Rs.1 lakh in Union Budget 2018.
Under Section 80E of the Income Tax Act has been designed to ensure that educating oneself doesn’t become an additional tax burden. Under this provision,
taxpayers are eligible for tax deductions on the interest repayment of a loan taken to pursue higher education.
This loan can be availed either by the taxpayer himself/herself or to sponsor the education of his/her ward/child. Only individuals are eligible for this deduction, with
loans taken from approved charitable organizations and financial institutions permitted for tax benefits.
Section 80G encourages taxpayers to donate to funds and charitable institutions, offering tax benefits on monetary donations. All assessees are eligible for this
deduction, subject to them providing proof of payment, with the limit of deductions decided based on a few factors.
100% deductions without any limit: Donations to funds like National Defence Fund, Prime Minister’s Relief Fund, National Illness Assistance Fund, etc.
qualify for 100% deduction on the amount donated.
100% deduction with qualifying limits: Donations to local authorities, associations or institutes to promote family planning and development of sports
qualify for 100% deduction, subject to certain qualifying limits.
50% deduction without qualifying limits: Donations to funds like the PMs Drought Relief fund, Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, etc. are eligible for 50%
deduction.
50% deduction with qualifying limit: Donations to religious organisations, local authorities for purposes apart from family planning and other charitable
institutes are eligible for 50% deduction, subject to certain qualifying limits.
The qualifying limit refers to 10% of the gross total income of a taxpayer.
Section 80GG: Individual taxpayers who do not receive house rent allowance are eligible for this deduction on the rent paid by them, subject to a
maximum deduction equivalent to 25% of their total income or Rs 2,000 a month. The lower of these options can be claimed as deduction.
Section 80GGA: Tax deductions under this section can be availed by all assessees, subject to them not having any income through profit or gain from a
business or profession. Donations by such members to enhance social/scientific/statistical research or towards the National Urban Poverty Eradication
Fund are eligible for tax benefits.
Section 80GGB: Tax deductions under this section can be availed by Indian Companies only, with the amount donated by them to a political party or
electoral trust qualifying for deductions.
Section 80GGC: Under this section, funds donated/contributed by an assessee to a political party or electoral trust are eligible for deduction. Local
authorities and artificial juridical persons are not entitled to the tax deductions available under Section 80GGC.
Section 80 IA provides an avenue for all taxpaying assessees to claim tax deductions on the profits generated through industrial activities. These industrial
undertakings can be related to telecommunication, power generation, industrial parks, SEZs, etc.
Section 80-IAB: Section 80 IAB can be used by SEZ developers, who can claim tax deductions on their profits through development of Special Economic
Zones. These SEZs need to be notified after 1/4/2005 in order for them to be eligible for tax deductions.
Section 80-IB: Provisions of section 80-IB can be used by all assessees who have profits from hotels, ships, multiplex theatres, cold storage plants, housing
projects, scientific research and development, convention centres, etc.
Section 80-IC: Section 80 IC can be used by all assessees who have profits from states categorised as special. These include Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya,
Himachal Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Arunachal Pradesh, Mizoram, Tripura and Nagaland.
Section 80-ID: All assessees who have profits or gain from hotels and convention centres are eligible for deduction under this section, subject to their
establishments being located in certain specified areas.
Section 80-IE: All assessees who have undertakings in North-East India are eligible for deductions under this Section, subject to certain conditions.
Section 80J of the Income Tax Act was amended to include two subsections, 80JJA and 80 JJAA
Section 80 JJA: Section 80 JJA relates to deductions permitted on profits and gains from assessees who are in the business of processing/treating and
collecting bio-degradable waste to produce biological products like bio-fertilizers, bio-pesticides, bio-gas, etc.All assessees who deal with this are eligible
for deductions under this section. Such assessees can claim deduction equivalent to 100% of their profits for 5 successive assessment years since the time
their business started.
Section 80 JJAA: Deductions under Section 80 JJAA can be claimed by Indian companies which have profits from the manufacture of goods in factories.
Deductions equivalent to 30% of the salary of new full time employees for a period of 3 assessment years can be claimed. A chartered accountant should
audit the accounts of such companies and submit a report showing the returns. Employees who are taken on a contract basis for a period less than 300
days in the preceding year or those who work in managerial or administrative posts do not qualify for deductions.
Deductions under Section 80LA can be availed by Scheduled Banks which have offshore banking units in Special Economic Zones, entities of International Financial
Services Centres and banks which have been established outside India, in accordance to the laws of a foreign nation.
These assessees are eligible for deductions equivalent to 100% of the income for the first 5 years, and 50% of income generated through such transactions for the
next 5 years, subject to the rules of the land.
Such entities should have relevant permission, either under the SEBI Act, Banking Regulation Act or registration under any other relevant law.
Section 80P caters to cooperative societies, offering tax deductions on their income, subject to certain conditions. 100% deduction is permitted to cooperative
societies which have incomes through cottage industries, fishing, banking, sale of agricultural harvest grown by members and milk supplied by members to milk
cooperative societies.
Cooperative societies which are involved in other forms of business are eligible for deductions ranging between Rs 50,000 and Rs 1 lakh, depending on the type of
work they are involved in.
Deductions which can be claimed by all cooperative societies are listed below.
Section 80QQB permits tax deductions on royalty earned from sale of books. Only resident Indian authors are eligible to claim deductions under this section, with the
maximum limit set at Rs 3 lakhs. Royalty on literary, artistic and scientific books are tax deductible, whereas royalties from textbooks, journals, diaries, etc. do not
qualify for tax benefits. In case of an author getting royalties from abroad, the said amount should be brought into the country within a specified time period in order
to avail tax benefits.
Patent owners are given tax breaks under Section 80RRB, which also grants tax relief to residents who receive royalties from their patent as income. If the patent is
registered after March 31, 2003, royalty payments up to Rs 3 lakh can be deducted. Those who get royalties from overseas must bring those funds into the nation
within a certain time frame in order to be qualified for tax deductions on those royalties.
Section 80TTA permits individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUF) below 60 years to claim tax deductions of up to Rs. 10,000 on interest earned from savings
accounts held at banks or post offices.
For senior citizens, Section 80TTB offers tax deductions of up to Rs. 50,000 on interest income from bank or post office deposits. This section extends tax benefits for
interest income received from various account types, including savings accounts and fixed deposits.
Only resident individual taxpayers with disabilities are eligible to claim tax deductions under Section 80U. A maximum deduction of Rs.75,000 per year is available to
anyone who have been declared Persons With At Least 40% Disability by the pertinent medical authorities. If they meet certain requirements, those with severe
disabilities are eligible for a maximum deduction of Rs.1.25 lakh. Autism, mental retardation, cerebral palsy, and other conditions are among the disabilities that
qualify for tax advantages.
Joint Commissioners:
Joint Commissioners are appointed by the Central Government. The main function of the authority is to detect tax- evasion and supervise subordinate officers. Under
the different provisions of the Act, the Joint Commissioner enjoys the power to accord approval to adopt fair market value as full consideration, instruct income tax
officers, exercise powers of income tax officers, the power to call information, to inspect registers of companies, to make any enquiry among other powers.
Income-Tax Officers:
While Income-Tax officers of Class I services are appointed by the Central Government, Income-tax Officers of Class II services are appointed by the Commissioner of
Income-Tax. Powers, functions and duties of Income-Tax officers are provided in many sections, some of which are Power of search and seizure, Power of assessment,
Power to call for information, Power of Survey etc.
Inspectors of Income-Tax:
They are appointed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax. Inspectors of Income-Tax have to perform such functions as are assigned to them by the Commissioner or
any other authority under whom they are appointed to work.
The Income Tax Act, 1961 specifies the scope of the powers handed to the income-tax authorities. Given below are some of the important powers of the Income Tax
Authorities and their scope as given in the Sections provided under the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The Board can also authorize Director General or Chief Commissioner or Commissioner to issue orders in writing to the effect that the functions conferred or assigned
to the Assessing Officer in respect of the above four criteria shall be exercised or performed by Joint Commissioner or Joint Director.
Also, the Assessing Officer has been vested with jurisdiction over any area or limits of such area -
1. If a person carries on business or profession only in that area. In respect of that person; or
2. If a person carries on business or profession in more than one place, then the principal place of business or profession situated in that area; or
3. In respect of any other person residing within that area.
Any dispute relating to jurisdiction to assess any person by an Assessing Officer shall be determined by Director General /Chief Commissioner/Commissioner of
Income Tax If the dispute is relating to areas within the jurisdiction of different Director General /Chief Commissioner/ Commissioner, then such issue is to be solved
mutually among themselves. If the above authorities are not in agreement among themselves such matter has to be decided by the Board or Director General/ Chief
Commissioner/ Commissioner authorized by the Board.
conclusion
It is believed that tax-authorities are independent judicial officers who are required to pass reasoned orders based on their own reasoning un-influenced by
instructions or advice from their superior officers. The Central Excise adjudication manual published in 1988 (that was its last publication), in para 39 directed that
Board Orders and reference numbers should not be quoted in the Adjudication Orders. It was further advised that Law Ministry’s opinion is confidential and should
never be communicated in the same language to even sub-ordinate officers. There are several Assistant Commissioners who boast “I am an adjudicating authority
and not bound by the Board orders”.
This has resulted in a considerable degree of uncertainty in financial management with respect to taxes. For example it is hard to determine for the assesses, the
binding value of circulars issued by CBDT under Section 119 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Also, these circulars blatantly contradict statutory provisions that have been
given binding effect, displace the authoritative pronouncements of the Higher Judiciary and cause an erosion of the constitutionally-mandated effect of Supreme
Court declarations under Article 141.
In recent times the catena of judicial pronouncements and statue provisions are creating quite a stir. However, there is still a need to further define and redefine and
implement the extent to which Income Tax authorities are required to exercise their powers and perform their functions so as to prevent harassment of assesses, tax-
evasion, unnecessary discrimination in collection of tax and to help assesses effectively manage taxes.
Types of Assessment
Self-Assessment.
Summary Assessment.
Regular Assessment
Scrutiny Assessment.
Best Judgment Assessment.
Re-assessment/income escaping assessment
Before submitting the return assessee is supposed to find whether he is liable for any tax or interest. For this purpose, section 140(A) has been introduced in
the Income Tax Act, where any tax is payable based on any return required to be furnished under sec 139, or sec 142 or 148 or Sec 153A after deducting
The assessee shall pay tax & interest before furnishing a return and proof of such payment will be accompanied under the return of income. In short, we can say that
the assessee himself determines the income tax payable. The tax department has made available various forms for filing income tax returns. The assessee
consolidates his income from various sources and adjusts the same against losses or deductions or various exemptions, if any, available to him during the year. The
total income of the assessee is then arrived at. The assessee reduces the TDS and Advance tax from that amount to determine the tax payable on such income. Tax if
still payable by him, is called self-assessment tax and must be paid by him before he files his return of income. This process is known as Self-Assessment.
In this type of assessment, the information submitted by the assessee in the return of income is cross-checked against the information that the income
tax department has access to, it is a type of assessment carried out without any human intervention, if any tax liability/refund arises on summary assessment,
intimation u/s 143(1) will be sent to assessee through e-mail. This intimation should be treated u/s 156(1) or a refund order. No separate demand notice will be
issued. In this process, the reasonableness and correctness of the return are verified by the department. The return gets processed online, and adjustments for
arithmetical errors, incorrect claims, and disallowances are automatically done.
Regular Assessment
The income tax department authorizes the assessing officer or income tax authority, not below the rank of an income tax officer, to conduct this assessment. The
purpose is to ensure that the assessee has neither understated his income nor overstated any expense or loss or underpaid any tax.
Scrutiny Assessment is one of the assessments of the Income Tax Return under the Income Tax Act. As the name suggests, the Assessing Officer (AO) critically and
thoroughly inspects and examines all the details of the Income Tax Return of the assessee to check that such details filed by the assessee are correct and genuine. The
AO tries to ensure that the assessee is not using any illegal practice to avoid tax liability in any manner. The AO also gives the opportunity of being heard to the
Assessee and thus assessee can produce and substantiate all the details filled in the ITR with evidence. In case any discrepancy, disparity, or inconsistency is found in
the ITR then the AO is empowered to charge penalties from the assessee.
This type of assessment is made when the assessee is not complying with the tax provisions. The A.O., in the absence of sufficient information of the assessee,
according to the best of his ability, knowledge, and experience makes such judgment. In short, Best judgment assessment refers to a situation where the officer
computes the tax payable as the assessee does not comply to provide or maintain necessary source documents or book of accounts to support the claim when
requested to submit.
In this scenario, the officer computes the tax liability based on his best judgment. The income tax act specifies certain situations under which the income tax officer
can compute tax liability based on best judgment,
Income escaping assessment refers to income that has been omitted from the Income Tax assessment of a particular taxpayer. The proceedings which govern a case
of income escaping assessment can be initiated by the income tax department if certain incomes have escaped assessment or income has been assessed at a lower
rate or excessive loss or allowances have been allowed. In such a scenario, the assessing officer is entitled to reassess the assessment of the relevant assessment year.
An assessing officer should not merely act on rumor or suspicion but rely on substantial evidence before initiating procedures. The assessing officer must conduct his
operations in good faith.
Every assessee, who earns income beyond the basic exemption limit in a financial year must file a statement containing details of his income, deductions, and other
related information. This is called the income tax return (ITR). Once you as a taxpayer file the income returns, the Income Tax Department will process it. There are
occasions where the return of an assessee gets picked for an assessment. The assessment plays an important role in the examination of the details submitted by a
taxpayer by the Income Tax Department.
ITR filing for some special entities: Charitable & Religious trusts are required to file ITR, if income before giving effect to exemptions u/s 11 and 12 exceeds the
maximum amount not chargeable to tax. Political Parties are required to file ITR, if income before giving effect to exemptions u/s 12A exceeds the maximum amount
not chargeable to tax. Hospitals, medical institutions, colleges and other specified institutions u/s 10; Investor protection fund, Core settlement Guarantee fund, and
others, as specified under Sec 139(4C) are required to file ITR, if income before giving effect to exemptions u/s 10 exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to
tax.
Any company other than a company who is required to furnish a report in Form September 30 of the assessment year
No. 3CEB under section 92E (i.e. other than covered in 2 below)
Any person (may be corporate/non-corporate) who is required to furnish a report November 30 of the assessment year
in Form No. 3CEB under section 92E
Any person (other than a company) whose accounts are to be audited under the September 30 of the assessment year
Income-tax Law or under any other law
A working partner of a firm whose accounts are required to be audited under this September 30 of the assessment year
Act or under any other law
1. Late fees u/s 234F – Such fees has been introduced by Finance Act 2017. The late fees levied is Rs. 5,000 if ITR is filed upto 31st December of the
Assessment year and Rs. 10,000 afterwards. However, if the total income of assessee does not exceed Rs. 5 Lakhs, then such fees is limited to Rs. 1,000.
2. As per Sec 139(3) read with Sec 80, if the return is filed after the due date specified, losses cannot be carried forward. However, unabsorbed depreciation
& House property losses can be carried forward, even if return is filed after the due date. Also, Sec 80 does not prohibit set-off of losses in the same year.
Hence, set-off of losses in same year is allowed, even if return of income is filed after due date.
3. As per Finance Act 2017, religious / charitable trusts shall not get exemption u/s 11 & 12, if ITR filed after due date.
4. Belated return u/s 139(4) can be filed at anytime by the end of assessment year.
5. As per prescribed rules, ITR can be filed after due date of belated return (31st March of Assessment year), by applying for condonation of delay u/s 119(2)
(b), in case of carry forward of losses & refund claims. However, such condoation shall be given only in case of genuine hardships. (For details refer
Circular No. 9/2015)
Revision of Income Tax Returns
1.Upto AY 2017-18 , revised return could have filed upto 1 year from end of assessment year.
2.However from AY 2018-19, revised return can be filed at anytime before the end of assessment year or before completion of assessment, whichever is earlier.
2. With effect from Finance Act 2016, ITR is not treated as defective, even if self assessment tax, interest u/s 140A has not been paid.
1. If at any time during assessment proceedings, Assessing officer is of the opinion that, it is necessary to get the books of accounts audited, having regard to the
complexity of the case & in the interest of revenue, he may ask assessee to get his accounts audited. However, he has to give assessee reasonable opportunity of
being heard before giving such directions.
2. Audit shall be done by a Chartered accounted nominated by Chief commissioner or commissioner.
Sl
Section No. and Description Penalty
No
Section 270A-
- 50% of the amount of tax payable on under-
5) - Penalty for under-reporting of income reported income.
- Penalty for under-reporting on account of misreporting of - In case of misreporting, 200% of the amount of tax
income payable on under-reported income
Section 271AAA- Where search has been initiated under Section 10% of the undisclosed income of the specified
8)
132 between 1st day of June, 2007 and 1st day of July, 2012 previous year
9) Section 271AAA(1)- Where search was initiated after 1-7- 2012 a) 10% of the undisclosed income if: Assessee admits
but before 15-12-2016 and undisclosed income was found the undisclosed income along with the manner of
deriving the same.
-Substantiates the manner in which undisclosed
income was derived
-Pays the tax along with interest and furnishes the
return of income for the specified previous year
declaring undisclosed income on or before the
specified date
*Section 68- Cash Credits At the rate of 10% on tax payable under Section
15)
Section 69- Unexplained Investments 115BBE
Section 69A- Unexplained money Section
69B-Amount of investments not fully disclosed in books of
account Section
69C-Unexplained expenditure
21) Section 271CA- Failure to collect tax at source Sum equal to the amount of tax not collected
Section 271D- Accepting loan or deposit or specified sum in Sum equal to the loan or deposit or specified sum
22)
contravention of Section 269SS taken
Section 271DA- Receiving any sum( Rs. 2 Lakhs or more) in
23) Sum equal to the amount of receipt
contravention to the provisions of Section 269ST
Section 285A-
- Where any interest/share in an entity registered outside India - 2% of the value of the transaction in respect of
31)
obtains its value from assets located in India and which such failure has taken place if such transaction
- Where such foreign company holds assets in the Indian concern had the effect of directly or indirectly transferring the
Such an Indian concern shall, for the purposes of determination of right of management/control in relation to the Indian
any income accruing or arising in India, furnish the documents concern.
within the prescribed time
- Rs. 5,00,000 in any other case
Section 272B-
The sections dealing with offences and prosecution proceedings are included in Chapter XXII of the Income-tax Act, 1961 i.e. S. 275A to S. 280D of the Act (hereinafter
referred as “ said Act”). However, the provisions contained in said Chapter XXII of the Act do not inter se deal with the procedures regulating the prosecution itself,
which is governed by the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The provisions of the said Code are to be followed relating to all offences under the
Income-tax Act, unless the contrary is specially provided for by the Act. An appropriate example would be S. 292A of the Act that prescribes that S. 360 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Order to release on probation of good conduct or after admonition) and the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, would not apply to a person
convicted of an offence under the Income–tax Act, unless the accused is under eighteen of age. The Finance Act, 2012, w.e.f. 1-7-2012 has inserted S. 280A to 280D,
wherein the Central Government has been given the power to constitute Special Courts in consultation with the Chief Justices of the respective jurisdictional High
Courts. Normally, the Magistrate Court in whose territorial jurisdiction an offence is committed tries the offence. For direct tax cases, the offence is said to committed
at the place where a false return of income is submitted, even though it is completely possible that the return has be prepared elsewhere or that accounts have been
fabricated at some other place. In J. K. Synthetics Ltd. v. ITO (1987) 168 ITR 467 (Delhi) (HC), the Court held that the offence u/s. 277 of the Act can be tried only at the
place wherefalse statement is delivered (SLP was rejected (1988) 173 ITR 98 (st). also refer Babita Lila v. UOI (2016) 387 ITR 305 (SC). A First Class Magistrate or a
Metropolitan Magistrate, should try the prosecution case under the direct taxes. If a Special Economic Offences Court with specified jurisdiction is notified, the
complaint is to be filed before the respective court. For ready reference an easy to understand summary of prosecutions provisions under Income–tax Act has been
reproduced in a chart as per annexure “A”.
In S.P. Sales Corporation v. S. R. Sikdar (1993) 113 Taxation 203 (SC) and G. L. Didwania v. ITO (1995) 224 ITR 687 (SC), the Hon’ble Apex Court laid down the principle
that “The Criminal Court no doubt has to give due regard to the result of any proceedings under the Act having bearing on the question in issue and in an appropriate
case it may drop the proceedings in the light of an order passed under the Act.” In
K. C. Builder v. ACIT (2004) 265 ITR 562 (SC), the court held that when the penalty is cancelled, the prosecution for an offence u/s 276C for wilful evasion of tax cannot
be proceeded with thereafter. Following this principle the courts have quashed prosecution proceedings on the basis of the cancellation of penalty by the Appellate
Authority (Shashichand Jain & Ors. v UOI (1995) 213 ITR 184 (Bom) (HC). When Tribunal decides against the assessee in quantum proceedings and if there is
possibility of department launching prosecution proceedings, it may be desirable for the assessee to file an appeal before the High Court. Various courts have held
that, when the substantial question of law is admitted by a High Court, it is not a fit case for the levy of penalty for concealment of Income
(CIT v. Nayan Builders and Developers (2014) 368 ITR 722 (Bom.) (HC), CIT v. Advaita Estate Development Pvt. Ltd. (ITA No. 1498 of 2014 dt. 17/2/2017) (Bom.)(HC),
(www.itatonline.org) CIT v. Dr. Harsha N. Biliangady (2015) 379 ITR 529 (Karn.) (HC). A harmonious reading of the various ratios it can be contended that if penalty
cannot be levied upon the admission of a substantial question of law by the Jurisdictional High Court, it cannot be a fit case for prosecution.
In V. Gopal v. ACIT (2005) 279 ITR 510 (SC), the court held that when the penalty order was set-aside, the Magistrate should decide the matter accordingly and quash
the prosecution.
In ITO v. Nandlal and Co. (2012) 341 ITR 646 (Bom.)(HC), the court held that, when the order for levy of penalty is set aside, prosecution for wilful attempt to evade
tax does not survive.
Non-initiation of penalty proceedings does not lead to a presumption that the prosecution cannot be initiated as held in Universal Supply Corporation v. State of
Rajasthan
(1994) 206 ITR 222 (Raj) (HC) (235), A.Y. Prabhakar (Kartha) HUF v. ACIT (2003) 262 ITR 287 (Mad.) (288). However, if penalty proceedings are initiated and after
considering the reply, the proceedings are dropped, it will not be a case for initiating prosecution proceedings. CBDT guidelines had instructed that where quantum
additions or penalty have been deleted by the departmental appellate authorities, then steps must be taken to withdraw prosecution (Guidelines F. No. 285/16/90-IT
(Inv) 43 dated 14-5-1996)
Offences by HUF
S. 278C provides for criminal liability of the Karta, or members of a HUF in respect of offences committed by the Hindu Undivided Family. Under this provision, when
an offence has been committed by HUF, the Karta thereof will be deemed to be liable to be prosecuted and punished accordingly, unless he proves that the offence
was committed without his knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the offence. If the offence was committed with the consent or connivance
of or is attributable to any neglect on the part of any other member of the family, such other member shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable
to be prosecuted and punished accordingly. In
Roshan Lal v. Special Chief Magistrate (2010) 322 ITR 353 (All.) (HC), the Court held that a member of HUF cannot be held liable for delay in filing of return of HUF
though he has participated in the assessment proceedings.
If an offence is committed by a credit institution, then the credit institution as well as every person, who at the time of the offence being committed was in-charge
and responsible to the credit institution for the conduct of the business of such institution, shall be deemed to be guilty and liable to be proceeded against. Burden
would be on such person to prove that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of
such offence,
then he will not be liable to be proceeded against.
4Th unit
When did GST start?
The history of GST goes back as early as the year 1954, when it was first adopted by France, followed by over 160 countries worldwide. Malaysia was one of the most
recent countries to adopt a valued-based tax system, GST, back in 2015. GST was first introduced in India in 2017 when they decided to introduce a dual tax structure
system.
The history of GST traces back more than 20 years ago to the year 2000 when the first discussion with regard to India adopting GST was made at a time when the Atal
Bihari Vajpayee government was in reign. An empowered committee of state finance ministers was chosen for this purpose since they had prior experience working
with State VAT. The Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Committee was formed in 2004, and the Committee recommended the introduction of GST.
During the 2006-07 Budget Speech, the then Union Finance Minister announced that GST would be introduced by April 1, 2010. However, for various reasons, the
introduction of GST had to be pushed further. The Constitution (115th Amendment) Bill, 2011, was introduced in the parliament. This Bill was introduced to
incorporate certain provisions of GST and was examined in detail by a Standing Committee. With the dissolution of the Lok Sabha in 2014, the Bill lapsed, thus
warranting the need for a new Constitutional Amendment Bill.
The goods and services tax (GST) is a value-added tax (VAT) levied on most goods and services sold for domestic consumption . The GST is paid by consumers, but it
is remitted to the government by the businesses selling the goods and services.
Critics point out, however, that the GST may disproportionately burden people whose self-reported income are in the lowest and middle income brackets, making
it a regressive tax.1 These critics argue that GST can therefore exacerbate income inequality and contribute to social and economic disparities. In order to address
these concerns, some countries have introduced GST exemptions or reduced GST rates on essential goods and services, such as food and healthcare. Others have
implemented GST credits or rebates to help offset the impact of GST on lower-income households.
What were the major defects in the structure of Indirect Taxes before the GST regime?
Before the implementation of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime in India, the indirect tax structure was fragmented, complicated, and riddled with numerous
defects. The indirect tax system in India is comprised of multiple taxes levied at different stages of the supply chain, including central excise duty, service tax, value-
added tax (VAT), central sales tax, and other levies. These taxes were levied by different authorities, resulting in a complicated and confusing tax structure. Here are
some of the major defects in the structure of Indirect taxes before GST:
1. Cascading Effect:
One of the significant problems with the pre-GST indirect tax system was the cascading effect of taxes, also known as the tax on tax. In the pre-GST regime, taxes
were levied at each stage of production and distribution, leading to a compounding effect of taxes. This resulted in an increase in the cost of goods and services,
making them expensive for the end consumer.
2. Multiple Taxes and Rates:
The pre-GST indirect tax structure had multiple taxes levied at different stages of the supply chain. The central government levied taxes such as excise duty, service
tax, and customs duty, while the state government levied taxes such as VAT, entry tax, and entertainment tax. Each tax had its own rate, making it complicated for
businesses to calculate and comply with the tax laws.
3. Compliance Burden:
Compliance with the pre-GST indirect tax system was complicated and time-consuming. Businesses had to comply with multiple tax laws, file separate tax returns,
maintain separate records, and undergo multiple audits. This resulted in a high compliance burden for businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises.
4. Tax Evasion:
The pre-GST indirect tax system was plagued with rampant tax evasion due to the complex tax laws and multiple tax rates. Many businesses found ways to evade
taxes, such as underreporting sales, claiming false exemptions, and claiming input tax credits fraudulently. This resulted in a loss of revenue for the government and
an uneven playing field for compliant businesses.
5. Lack of Uniformity:
The pre-GST indirect tax system lacked uniformity across states and industries. Different states had different tax rates, and industries were subject to different tax
laws and exemptions. This resulted in a lack of transparency and predictability in the tax regime, making it difficult for businesses to plan and invest in the long term.
In conclusion, the pre-GST indirect tax system in India was fraught with several defects, making it complicated, time-consuming, and expensive for businesses to
comply with the tax laws. The implementation of the GST regime in July 2017 has simplified the tax structure, reduced the compliance burden, and eliminated the
cascading effect of taxes. The GST regime has brought much-needed uniformity and transparency to the indirect tax system, making it easier for businesses to
operate and grow.
After years of deliberation and negotiations between the Central and State Governments, the Constitution (122 nd Amendment) Bill, 2014, was introduced in the
Parliament. The Bill aimed to amend the Constitution to enable the implementation of GST. The Constitution Amendment Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha in May,
2015. The Bill with certain amendments was finally passed in the Rajya Sabha and thereafter by the Lok Sabha in August, 2016. Further, the Bill has been ratified by
the required number of States and has since received the assent of the President on 8 th September, 2016 and has been enacted as the 101st Constitution Amendment
Act, 2016. The GST Council was notified w.e.f. 15th September, 2016. For assisting the GST Council, the office of the GST Council Secretariat was also established.
The GST Council, consisting of the Union Finance Minister and representatives from all States and Union Territories, was established to make decisions on various
aspects of GST, including tax rates, exemptions, and administrative procedures. It played a crucial role in shaping the GST framework in India. On 1 st July, 2017, GST
laws were implemented, replacing a complex web of Central and State taxes. Under the Indian GST, goods and services are categorized into different tax slabs,
including 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%. Some essential commodities are exempted from GST, Gold and job work for diamond attract low rate of taxation. Compensation
cess is being levied on demerit goods and ceratin luxury items.
To prepare for the implementation of GST, extensive efforts were made to build the necessary technological infrastructure and train tax officials and businesses. GST
Network (GSTN), a not-for-profit company, was created to provide the IT backbone for the GST system, including taxpayer registration, return filing, and tax
payments.
Since its implementation, the Indian GST has undergone various amendments and refinements based on feedback from businesses and the evolving economic
scenario. While the GST implementation initially posed challenges for businesses in terms of understanding the new compliance requirements and adapting to the
changes, it has gradually settled into the Indian tax landscape.
It can be said that the history of GST in India showcases a monumental shift in the country's tax structure, aiming to create a more unified, efficient, and transparent
indirect tax regime for the benefit of businesses and the economy as a whole.
Excise Monthly
Under GST, however, there are fewer returns to be filed. Therefore, the number of returns to be filed has come down. There are about 11 returns under GST, out of
which 4 are basic returns that apply to all regular taxable persons under GST. The main GSTR-1 is filed to report list of sales invoice and related documents for the tax
period.
The next return is GSTR-2A and GSTR-2B that are dynamic and static auto-drafted returns with input tax credit details reported as available or not for a taxpayers
during the tax period. The summary return in form GSTR-3B contains both sales and ITC information, any refund details as well as details of non-GST supplies for the
tax period. This return is filed to report the taxes payable, ITC claimed and taxes paid for the tax period.
Special treatment for e-Commerce operators
Before GST regime, supplying goods through the e-commerce sector did not have separate rules. It had variable VAT laws. Let us look at this example:
Online websites (like Flipkart and Amazon) delivering to Uttar Pradesh had to file a VAT declaration and mention the registration number of the delivery truck. Tax
authorities could sometimes seize goods if the documents were not produced.
Again, these e-commerce brands were treated as facilitators or mediators by states like Kerala, Rajasthan, and West Bengal which did not require them to register for
VAT.
All these differential treatments and confusing compliances have been removed under GST. For the first time, GST has clearly mapped out the common provisions
applicable to the e-commerce sector across India and since these are applicable all over India, there should be no complication regarding the inter-state movement of
goods anymore.
Earlier, the logistics industry in India had to maintain multiple warehouses across states to avoid the Central Sales Tax and state entry taxes on inter-state movement.
These warehouses were forced to operate below their capacity, giving room for increased operating costs.
Under GST, however, these restrictions on inter-state movement of goods have been lessened.
As an outcome of GST, warehouse operators and e-commerce aggregators players have shown interest in setting up their warehouses at strategic locations such as
Nagpur (which is the zero-mile city of India), instead of every other city on their delivery route.
Reduction in unnecessary logistics costs is already increasing profits for businesses involved in the supply of goods through transportation.
In the pre-GST era, it was often seen that certain industries in India like construction and textile were largely unregulated and unorganised.
Under GST, however, there are provisions for online compliances and payments, and for availing of input credit only when the supplier has accepted the amount. This
has brought in accountability and regulation to these industries.
Let us now look at the disadvantages of GST. Please note that businesses need to overcome these disadvantages to run the business smoothly.
Disadvantages of GST
Businesses have to track GST updates regularly. They must ensure that their accounting or ERP software gets updated in real time for GST legal and portal updates.
Else, they can go for a GST compliance solution to ensure continuous compliance. But both the options involve money to be invested and needs time commitment for
training employees so that there is efficient utilisation of the new GST software.
Clear has a ready-to-use, enterprise-grade GST solution- ClearGST software. Ensure compliance with latest GST laws and rules through AI-powered reconciliations,
insightful reports, end-to-end GST return filing, automated Table-4 reporting in GSTR-3B and much more!
Many small businesses in India are adapting GST changes with every passing month. When the law was first introduced, they had learn to issue GST-complaint
invoices, be compliant with digital record-keeping, and of course, file timely returns. This means that the GST-complaint invoice issued should have had mandatory
details such as GSTIN, place of supply, HSN codes, and others.
These same invoices can be easily imported through various options for accurate return filing through the ClearGST platform.
GST changed the way taxes are paid and returns are filed. Businesses needed to employ tax professionals who had expertise to stay GST-complaint. This gradually
increased costs for small businesses as they had to bear the additional cost of hiring experts.
Also, businesses needed to train their employees in GST compliance, further increasing their overhead expenses. A plug-and-play, SaaS-based solution such as
ClearGST allowed taxpayers to ensure compliance at reasonable cost.
Initially, as GST was implemented on the 1st of July 2017, businesses followed the old tax structure for the first 3 months (April, May, and June), and GST for the rest
of the financial year 2017-18.
Businesses found it hard to get adjusted to the GST regime, and some of them ran these tax systems parallelly, resulting in confusion and compliance issues.
Unlike earlier, businesses are had to switch from pen and paper invoicing and filing to online return filing and making payments. This was tough for some smaller
businesses to adapt to.
The process for GST return filing on ClearGST is easy to follow. Business owners need to only upload their invoices through easy-import options, and the software will
populate the return forms automatically with the information from the invoices for an error-free end-to-end filing. Any errors in invoices will be clearly identified by
the software in real-time, thus increasing efficiency and timeliness.
Smaller businesses, especially in the manufacturing sector have faced difficulties under GST. Earlier, only businesses whose turnover exceeded Rs.1.5 crore had to pay
excise duty. But now any business whose turnover exceeds Rs.20 lakh have to pay GST.
However, SMEs with a turnover upto Rs.75 lakh can opt for the composition scheme and pay only 1% tax on turnover in lieu of GST and enjoy lesser compliances. The
catch though is these businesses will then not be able to claim any input tax credit. The decision to choose between higher taxes or the composition scheme (and
thereby no ITC) continues to be a tough one for many SMEs.