Form Id 275230 Test Datasheets for QM E-form Template Version : V1.

0
Chainages (CH.) in Km (e.g 2.275)& Weight in Grams (gm)
EARTHWORK / SUBGRADE

✔ APPLICABLE 1 Field Density of: Earthwork Subgrade Heavy Compaction

(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH. 2.CH 3.CH

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No
Layer Value
Earthwork Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
Subgrade Not less than 100 per cent
Heavy Compaction Comment:
Not less than 98 per cent
(Modified Proctor)

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 1 Field Density of: Eartwork Subgrade Heavy Compaction

(Core cutter method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of Core Cutter = V cm3
2 Weight of empty Core Cutter = W gm
3 Weight of Core Cutter + Wet Soil = W1 gm
4 Weight of Wet Soil = W1-W gm
5 Bulk Density Yb = (W1 - W) / V gm/cm3
6 Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
7 m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
8 content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
9 wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
10 Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) = (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
11 Dry Density Yd = (100 / 100 + w) x Yb gm/cm3
12 Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No
Layer Value
Earthwork Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
Subgrade Not less than 100 per cent
Heavy Compaction Comment:
Not less than 98 per cent
(Modified Proctor)

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

1
 SUB-BASE

✔ APPLICABLE 2 2.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Granular Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 15 < 15 < 15
PAN
Calculate
6
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 2 2.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Granular Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
SN Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 15 < 15 < 15
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 2 2.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Granular Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
SN
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 15 < 15 < 15
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

2
 ✔ APPLICABLE 2 2.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Gravel Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

Percent of Wt. Percentage of
SN I. S. Sieve Designation Sample Percent of Wt.
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 2 2.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Gravel Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II :

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range

SN I. S. Sieve Designation
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 2 2.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Gravel Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III :

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : Grading Type Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range

SN I. S. Sieve Designation
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

3
 In Case of Ongoing Work
APPLICABLE 2 2.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material:

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1 53 mm -
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm -
5 4.75 mm -
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 2 2.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm -
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm -
5 4.75 mm -
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 2 2.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Retained(g) Permissible Range
Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm -
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm -
5 4.75 mm -
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:
If yes, "Gradation is as per norms",
if No, "Failed in "---" sieve"
Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

4
 ✔ APPLICABLE 3 Field Density of GSB Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

5
 BASE COURSE: 1st Layer ✔ WBM (GRADE-II) WBM (GRADE-III) WMM

✔ APPLICABLE 4 4.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 4 4.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 4 4.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III:
Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5

Calculate
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

6
 ✔ APPLICABLE 5 Field Density of WBM (GRADE-II) Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 6 Volumetric Analysis of WBM (GRADE-II) If WBM G-II, Type-A Type - B

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Volume of Box (cm3) L_____ cm B____ cm H cm Vol.______ cm3 Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of filler material (screening + binder) - V1
2 Volume of stone metal - V2
3 Volumetric Analysis (V.A) = (V1/V2)*100 %
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

7
 BASE COURSE: 2nd Layer ✔ WBM (GRADE-II) WBM (GRADE-III) WMM

✔ APPLICABLE 7 7.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 7 7.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5

Calculate
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 7 7.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

8
 ✔ APPLICABLE 8 Field Density of WBM (GRADE-II) Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 9 Volumetric Analysis of WBM (GRADE-II) If WBM G-II, Type-A Type - B

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Volume of Box (cm3) L_____ cm B cm H_____ cm Vol. cm3 Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of filler material (screening + binder) - V1
2 Volume of stone metal - V2
3 Volumetric Analysis (V.A) = (V1/V2)*100 %
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

9
 BASE COURSE: 3rd Layer ✔ WBM (GRADE-II) WBM (GRADE-III) WMM

✔ APPLICABLE 10 10.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5

Calculate
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 10 10.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 10 10.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - WBM (GRADE-II)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: Grading Type: WBM (GRADE-II)

Wt. of Cumulative Permissible Range

I. S Sieve Designation Percent of Wt. Percentage of
Sample Percent of Wt. WBM
Retained (g) Wt. Passing (%) WMM
WBM-II WBM-III WMM Retained (g) Retained (%) Grading-II Grading-III
75 mm 63 mm 53 mm 100 100 100
63 mm 53 mm 45 mm 90-100 95-100 95-100
53 mm 45 mm 22.4 mm 25-75 65-90 60-80
45 mm 22.4 mm 11.2 mm 0-15 0-10 40-60
22.4 mm 11.2 mm 4.75 mm 0-5 0-5 25-40
2.36 mm 15-30
600 micron 08_22
75 micron 0-5
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

10
 ✔ APPLICABLE 11 Field Density of WBM (GRADE-II) Heavy Compaction
(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If heavy compaction > 98%, else >100%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 12 Volumetric Analysis of WBM (GRADE-II) If WBM G-II, Type-A Type - B

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Volume of Box (cm3) L_____ cm B____ cm H_____ cm Vol.______ cm3 Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of filler material (screening + binder) - V1
2 Volume of stone metal - V2
3 Volumetric Analysis (V.A) = (V1/V2)*100 %
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

11
 In Case of Ongoing Work
APPLICABLE 13 13.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Base

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm -
3 19 mm -
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron -
7 300 micron -
8 75 micron -
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 13 13.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Base

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm -
3 19 mm -
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron -
7 300 micron -
8 75 micron -
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 13 13.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Base

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm -
3 19 mm -
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron -
7 300 micron -
8 75 micron -
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

12
 In Case of Ongoing Work
APPLICABLE 14 14.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase-Base (FDR)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of
Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 14 14.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase-Base (FDR)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate
9
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:
If yes, "Gradation is as per norms",
if No, "Failed in "---" sieve"
Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

In Case of Ongoing Work

APPLICABLE 14 14.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Cement Stabilised Subbase-Base (FDR)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III :

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing : Material

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of

SN Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%)
1 53 mm 100
2 37.5 mm 95-100
3 19 mm 45-100
4 9.5 mm 35-100
5 4.75 mm 25-100
6 600 micron 08--65
7 300 micron 05--40
8 75 micron 0-10
PAN
Calculate
9
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

13
 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE: ✔ BM DBM

✔ APPLICABLE 15 15.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I:

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Retained (g) Retained (%) BM DBM

1 26.5 mm 100 90-100

2 19 mm 90-100 71-95
3 13.2 mm 56-88 56-80
4 9.5 mm - -
5 4.75 mm 16-36 38-54
6 2.36 mm 04_19 28-42
7 1.18 mm - -
8 0.6 mm - -
9 0.3 mm 02_10 07_21
10 0.150 mm - -
11 75 micron 0-5 02_08
12 PAN
Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 15 15.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II:

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Retained (g) Retained (%) BM DBM

1 26.5 mm 100 90-100

2 19 mm 90-100 71-95
3 13.2 mm 56-88 56-80
4 9.5 mm - -
5 4.75 mm 16-36 38-54
6 2.36 mm 04_19 28-42
7 1.18 mm - -
8 0.6 mm - -
9 0.3 mm 02_10 07_21
10 0.150 mm - -
11 75 micron 0-5 02_08

Calculate
12 PAN
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

14
 ✔ APPLICABLE 15 15.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III:

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of Permissible Range

SN Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%)
Retained (g) Retained (%) BM DBM

1 26.5 mm 100 90-100

2 19 mm 90-100 71-95
3 13.2 mm 56-88 56-80
4 9.5 mm - -
5 4.75 mm 16-36 38-54
6 2.36 mm 04_19 28-42
7 1.18 mm - -
8 0.6 mm - -
9 0.3 mm 02_10 07_21
10 0.150 mm - -
11 75 micron 0-5 02_08

Calculate
12 PAN
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 16 16.1 Field Density of : Heavy Compaction

(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Density as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If compaction > 98%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

15
 ✔ APPLICABLE 16 16.2 Field Density of : Heavy Compaction
(Core cutter method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Density as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of Core Cutter = V cm3
2 Weight of empty Core Cutter = W gm
3 Weight of Core Cutter + Wet Soil = W1 gm
4 Weight of Wet Soil = W1-W gm
5 Bulk Density Yb = (W1 - W) / V gm/cm3
6 Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: (If compaction > 98%) Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark:

Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 17 Binder Content of

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Bitumen content as per job mix (%) Date of Testing:

SN Observations (Weight in gm) 1.CH.___ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Wt. of mix taken before extraction (W1)
2 Wt. of filter paper before extraction (B)
3 Wt. of mix after extraction (W2 )
4 Wt. of filter paper after extraction (D)
5 Wt. of filler collected from extract after allowing for setting (W4)
6 Wt. of filler collected in filter paper (D-B) = W3
7 Wt. of Aggregate + filler collected after extraction = W2 + W3 + W4
8 Percentage of Bitumen (in the mix) (W1 - ( W2 + W3 + W4 ))*100 / W1
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

16
BITUMINOUS SURFACE COURSE: OGPC&SEAL COAT ✔ SDBC MSS SURAFACE DRESSING BC

✔ APPLICABLE 18 18.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-I:

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Gradation Type: Select Gradation Type Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN (mm) Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 PAN
Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 18 18.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II:

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Gradation Type: Select Gradation Type Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN (mm) Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
PAN
Calculate
22
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

17
 ✔ APPLICABLE 18 18.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates -

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III:

Weight of Sample Taken (gm) : Gradation Type: Select Gradation Type Date of Testing :

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percentage of

SN (mm) Sample Retained (g) Percent of Wt. Wt. Passing (%) Permissible Range
Retained (g) Retained (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
PAN
Calculate
22
Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 19 Binder Content of

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Bitumen content as per job mix (%) Date of Testing:

SN Observations (Weight in gm) 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Wt. of mix taken before extraction (W1)
2 Wt. of filter paper before extraction (B)
3 Wt. of mix after extraction (W2 )
4 Wt. of filter paper after extraction (D)
5 Wt. of filler collected from extract after allowing for setting (W4)
6 Wt. of filler collected in filter paper (D-B) = W3
7 Wt. of Aggregate + filler collected after extraction = W2 + W3 + W4
8 Percentage of Bitumen (in the mix) (W1 - ( W2 + W3 + W4 ))*100 / W1
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

18
 SHOULDER : EARTHEN ✔ MURRAM GSB

✔ APPLICABLE 20 Field Density of Shoulder

(Sand replacement method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

a) Calibration 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

(i) Mean weight of sand in cone (of pouring cylinder) (W2) in gm.
(ii) Volume of calibrating cylinder (V) in cm3.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into calibrating container (W1) in gm.
(iv) Mean weight of sand (+cylinder) after pouring into calibrating container (W3) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand to fill calibrating cylinder. (Wa = W1 - W2 - W3) in gm.
(vi) Bulk density of sand Ys = (Wa /V) gm/cm3
b) Determination of soil density
(i) Determination number
(ii) Weight of wet soil from hole (Ww) in gm.
(iii) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) before pouring into hole (W1) in gm.
(iv) Weight of sand (+ cylinder) after pouring into hole and cone (W4) in gm.
(v) Weight of sand in hole, in gm Wb = (W1 - W4- W2)
(vi) Bulk density Yb = (Ww /Wb) x Ys gm/cm3
(vii) Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
(viii) Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
(ix) Weight of dry soil from the hole in gm (Wd) = (Ww/100+w)*100
(x) Dry density Yd = (Wd/ Wb ) x Ys gm/cm3
(xi) Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No
Type Value
Earthen / Murram Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
GSB Not less than 100 per cent
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 20 Field Density of Shoulder

(Core cutter method)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Maximum Dy Density (MDD) as per lab record (gm/cc) 1.CH________ 2.CH_____ 3.CH______ Date of Testing:

SN Observation 1.CH._______ 2.CH______ 3.CH______

1 Volume of Core Cutter = V cm3
2 Weight of empty Core Cutter = W gm
3 Weight of Core Cutter + Wet Soil = W1 gm
4 Weight of Wet Soil = W1-W gm
5 Bulk Density Yb = (W1 - W) / V gm/cm3
6 Moisture Content By RMM By Sand Bath Method
7 m = % water Weight of wet soil (g) W1
8 content of the Weight of dry soil (g) W2
9 wet mass Loss of water (g) = W1-W2
10 Percentage of Moisture Content % (w) = (m/100-m)*100 (W1-W2)/W2 *100
11 Dry Density Yd = (100 / 100 + w) x Yb gm/cm3
12 Degree of compaction in percentage
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No Yes No Yes No
Type Value
Earthen / Murram Not less than 98 per cent Remark:
GSB Not less than 100 per cent
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

19
 ✔ APPLICABLE 21 21.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Granular)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-1:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
SN
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 10 < 10 < 10
PAN
Calculate
6
Click here to auto calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 21 21.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Granular)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 10 < 10 < 10
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 21 21.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Granular)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing : GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN
I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II Grading-III
1 75 mm 100 - -
2 53 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 55-75 50-80 100
4 4.75 mm 10_30 15-35 25-45
5 75 micron < 10 < 10 < 10
6 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

20
 ✔ APPLICABLE 21 21.1 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Gravel)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-1:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 21 21.2 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Gravel)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-II:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range

SN I. S. Sieve Designation
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 21 21.3 Gradation Analysis of Aggregates - Shoulder - GSB (Gravel)

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Chainage-III:

Weight of Sample Taken (g) : Date of Testing: GSB Grading Select GSB Grading

SN I. S. Sieve Designation Wt. of Sample Percent of Wt. Cumulative Percent Percentage of Permissible Range
Retained(g) Retained (g) of Wt. Retained (%) Wt. Passing (%) Grading-I Grading-II
1 53 mm 100 -
2 37.5 mm - 100
3 26.5 mm 75-95 -
4 19 mm - 80-100
5 9.5 mm 40-75 55-80
6 4.75 mm 30-60 40-60
7 425 µ 15-30 15-30
8 75 µ < 15 < 15
9 PAN
Click here to auto calculate Calculate Remark:
Whether confirms to the prescribed limit: Yes No
Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

21
 NEW TECHNOLOGY TEST

✔ APPLICABLE 22 Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP) Test

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13

Layer Select Layer Date of Testing:

Chainage-I Chainage-II Chainage-III

SN No. of Blows Reading (mm) Reading (mm) Reading (mm)
1 0
2 3
3 6
4 9
5 12
6 15
7 18
8 21
9 24
10 27
11 30
12 33
13 36
14 39
15 42
16 45
Depth of penetration (D)
= Final reading - Initial reading
DCP = Avg. Penetration / Blow
= D / No. of Blows
Field CBR (%) = 410/(DCP^1.27)
Whetehr confirms to the prescribed Yes No Yes No Yes No

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

✔ APPLICABLE 23 Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS) Test

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Age of sample(M)

Layer Select Layer UCS as per DPR Date of Testing:

Weight of Compressive Whether confirms to the standard

Density Volume of sample
SN Chainage Sample Date of testing Load in (KN) Strength
(gm/cc) (cc)
(gm) (N/mm2) Yes No
1
2
3

Remark: Comment:

Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

22
 ✔ APPLICABLE 24 Rebound Hammer Test

Road Name / Package No. : L109-Nadiah to Chaukhandi / JH17XVI-2-PAL13 Age of sample (M):
CC Pavement Type CH1Select Layer
Select Type CH2 Select Type CH3 Select Type Design Strength MPa Date of Testing:

Chainage-I Chainage-II Chainage-III Remark:

SN
Reading Reading Reading
1 Note- Readings should be taken in the center of each
2 cell of the 3X3 grid (total of 9 values)
3 Comment:
4

30 cm
5
6
7
8
9 30cm
Average of Readings Not on Scale
Compressive Strength
Tested By: (Name of Head of PIU) Vishal Xalxo Executive ENgineer
(MPa)
Whether confirms to the Yes Yes Yes
prescribed limit: No No No Test conducted in my presence: Jagdish Rai Garg

`
Interpretation of Rebound Hammer value (Avg.) to convert in Compressive Strength (Refer Angle -90 for Concrete Pavement)

23