Maine Used Car Buyer Rights Guide
Maine Used Car Buyer Rights Guide
9
CONSUMER RIGHTS WHEN YOU
BUY A USED VEHICLE
§ 9. 1. Introduction
This consumer rights chapter provides information on how you can protect yourself when pur-
chasing a used motor vehicle. It contains the following sections:
§ 9. 2. Buying A Used Vehicle
§ 9. 3. Immediate Rejection Of A Defective Used Vehicle
§ 9. 4. Your Warranty That Your Vehicle Can Pass State
Inspection
§ 9. 5. Unsafe Motor Vehicles
§ 9. 6. You Have A Right To A Written Disclosure Of The
Vehicle’s History And Warranties
§ 9. 7. You Have A Right To Adequate And Timely Repair
§ 9. 8. Transfer Of Warranties
§ 9. 9. Service Contracts
§ 9. 10. Your Legal Remedies
§ 9. 11. Odometer Fraud
§ 9. 12. Summary Of Your Used Vehicle Rights
§ 9. 13. Guide To The Used Car Information Window
Sticker
§ 9. 14. Guide To The Unsafe Motor Vehicle Sticker
§ 9. 15. Maine Secretary Of State Used Car Information
Act Rules
§ 9. 16. Emission Testing And Warranties
§ 9. 17. An Estimate Of The Average Life Of Car Parts
§ 9. 18. 50/50 Written Warranties
§ 9. 19. Spot Deliveries
§ 9. 20. Interest Rate Kickbacks and Dealer Deception
9 – 2 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
1
10 M.R.S.A. §§ 1471-1478. For the purposes of the Used Car Information Act, “dealer” includes used car dealers and
finance companies and banks selling repossessed cars at retail sales. 10 M.R.S.A. § 1471(2). This law only applies to
sales by dealers and does not apply to private, non-dealer sales. A motorcycle is not considered a “used car.” See 10
M.R.S.A. §1471(4). See Tanguay v. Seacoast Tractor Sales, 494 A.2d 1364 (Me. 1985) (Used Car Information Act will
be interpreted liberally to carry out legislature’s beneficent purpose of protecting purchasers of used cars).
2
10 M.R.S.A. § 1477(3). Dealers who violate this Act are also subject to civil penalties pursuant to 10 M.R.S.A. §
1477(2). See State v. Sunshine Auto Brokers, No. CV-88-42 (Me. Super. Ct., Kennebec Cty., July 14, 1989) (defendants
were ordered to pay a civil penalty of $10,700 and restitution to consumers of $3,522 for violations of the Used Car
Information Act and motor vehicle inspection laws).
3
See 10 M.R.S.A. § 1473 and § 1475(2-A)(E). While dealers can disclaim implied warranties on used cars, manufacturers
cannot. Thus, if you purchase a used car that is not yet 4 years old you may still have implied warranty rights against the
manufacturer. See 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-318. (The older the car the less likely this would be; it is of course harder to prove a
manufacturer’s defect when the car is well traveled.) In the case of Faulkingham v. Seacoast Subaru, Inc., 577 A.2d 772
(Me. 1990) the dealer failed to disclaim implied warranties when it sold a 1984 Chrysler Laser with 22,194 miles. The
purchase price was $6,495. The Maine Law Court found that there was “substantial evidence showing that the Laser
failed to perform up to the level reasonably expected of a car of its age, mileage and purchase price.” Id. at 744. The
Court further found that there was no credible evidence suggesting that the Laser’s engine problems originated after the
purchaser took possession of the car.
4
10 M.R.S.A. §1475 (2-A) (H).
5
See Chapter 3 in this Guide, The Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act.
MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE 9 - 3
§ 9. 3. Immediate Rejection Of A
Defective Used Vehicle
Even if the dealer only warrants that your car can pass a State inspection, you still may be able to
cancel the sale if the car immediately (within the first day or so) proves seriously defective. This is the
Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) right of “immediate rejection.”
If you discover a defect right after you buy a used car (with or without a warranty), and before any
significant mileage6 then pursuant to 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-602 of the U.C.C.:
A. You can immediately “reject” the car (i.e., cancel the sale) and demand the return of
the purchase price and damages, if any.7 You should do this in writing and state your
reasons for rejecting the car. Mail this notice (registered mail, return receipt) to the
dealer and keep a copy for yourself. You should not use the car once you’ve notified
the dealer.
B. If the discovered defect is minor, then the dealer probably should have the right to
repair (“cure”)8 it. If the dealer cannot repair it within a reasonable time (e.g., a week
or two), then you still have a right to reject the car.
C. If the defect is substantial, then usually your remedy is replacement of the car or your
money back, not repair. Nor must you settle for replacement of the defective
component (e.g., a defective transmission) if the result is you will not have full
confidence in the repaired vehicle.9
The same rejection law can apply if you buy a new or used car and the dealer does not deliver the
exact car you purchased. For example, if you ordered a blue sedan for delivery by a certain date, you
can reject the vehicle if the dealer misses the delivery date or the sedan is red instead of blue. You
should ask for a full refund. Remember, before you try to reject a vehicle you should first consult with
a lawyer. See also § 6.5 in this Guide.
6
If you only occasionally use the product, there may be more time to reject. For example, if you bought a boat for pleasure
and only used it on weekend’s then the court might allow you additional days before you must either accept or reject the
boat. See, e.g., Don’s Marine, Inc. v. Halderman, 23 U.C.C. Rep. 78 (Tex. Civ. App. 1977).
7
Pursuant to the U.C.C., not only would you be eligible for the return of the purchase price but also for consequential and
incidental damages, if any. 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-715.
8
11 M.R.S.A. § 2-508. If the defect is not minor but the dealer’s contract “time of performance” has not expired, then the
dealer can still repair (“cure”) the defect. For example, if your contract for a used car requires the car to be delivered by
October 15 and you discover a serious defect on October 10, the dealer still has 5 days to “cure” the problem. If the
contract does not state a delivery date, most courts assume the “time of performance” date is the date the consumer
actually received the item from the dealer. See Schiavi Mobile Homes v. Gagne, 510 A.2d 236, 238 (Me. 1986) (for a
mobile home built to consumer’s specifications, “time for performance” is established by a “reasonableness” standard).
9
11 M.R.S.A. § 2-508. See Zabriskie Chevrolet, Inc. v. Smith, 240 A.2d 195 1205 (NJ 1968), (seller’s attempted
replacement of a defective transmission in a new car with a transmission of unknown lineage was held an inadequate
cure); see also Bayne v. Nall Motors, Inc., 12 U.C.C. rep. 1137 (Iowa Dist. Ct. 1973) (differential on a four-day-old car
that was driven only 400 miles locked up because of a lack of lubricant; the seller’s attempted replacement of the
differential was held to be an inadequate cure when the seller failed to check for damage to the power train and other
parts that was likely to have resulted from the lubrication problem).
10
10 M.R.S.A. § 1474(1) (2). See Thurber v. Bill Martin Chevrolet, Inc., 487 A.2d 631(Me.1985) (when a car was sold for
transportation in violation of the Used Car Information Act, the consumer received back his purchase price, a civil
9 – 4 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
penalty and his attorney’s fees, even though the contract specifically stated that the car was sold “as is /no state
inspection /no warranty”).
11
Even though a demonstrator is technically a “new” car, it is illegal for a dealer to sell you a demonstrator as a new car
without disclosing its history. See 10 M.R.S.A. § 1174(4)(B).
12
10 M.R.S.A. § 1474(3).
13
The engine is not an inspection item. However, if the transmission’s forward and reverse gears do not work, the car will
fail the brake inspection.
14
Section 29-A M.R.S.A. § 1751(2). In order to pass inspection the part must be “in good working order” and not pose a
hazard to occupants or the public. See 29-A M.R.S.A. § 1756(1).
15
10 M.R.S.A. § 1474(4).
MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE 9 - 5
dealer to repair it free of charge. If the dealer refuses to repair your car free of charge, you can sue him
and may be able to get all or most of your money back. The court can also order him to pay you a civil
penalty for not complying with the law and your attorney fees.16 See § 9.10, Your Legal Remedies.
You should also notify the State Police, as the dealer then risks fines and the loss of a State inspection
license.
If the car’s defect is serious and you feel you cannot trust the dealer, you should consider
immediately returning the car and demanding your money back (see § 9.3, Immediate Rejection of A
Defective Used Car).
16
Even though the basic remedy provided in the Used Car Information Act is repair of any defects, if you have been sold a
seriously defective car, then you can argue that the dealer has also violated the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (5
M.R.S.A.§§ 207, 213) and that you are entitled to the return of your money (see Chapter 3 in this Guide, Unfair Trade
Practices In Maine).
17
10 M.R.S.A. § 1475; see also §§ 9.13-9.14 for annotated samples of these window stickers. This is true even when the
dealer is selling a car through an auction. See 9 M.R.S.A. § 367(1).
18
You should also carefully examine the title. It can reveal whether the car has been damaged or salvaged. See § 10.5 in
this Guide, How to Read Your Vehicle’s Title. This means that buyers should immediately be informed whether the
vehicle has ever been salvaged or rebuilt. Dealers must also disclose if the vehicle had been accepted for Lemon Law
arbitration and subsequently purchased back by the manufacturer (see 10 M.R.S.A. § 1475(4)).
19
By statute (10 M.R.S.A. § 1475(3)), “substantial collision damage” which must be disclosed is damage that costs $2,000
or more to repair. Other damage or defects must be disclosed if they are so substantial that, if the buyer knew about
them, the buyer would pay less for the car or not buy it at all. On July 21, 1992, the Attorney General entered into a
UTPA Consent Decree with North River Road Auto Sales of Auburn, which prohibited it from failing to affix Used Car
Buyers Guides and disclosing substantial collision damage. North River Road paid a civil penalty of $3,400 and
restitution to injured consumers of $7,500.
9 – 6 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
20
Maine Used Car Information Act Rule 1(C ), Consumer Sales-Buyer’s Guide Window Form; see State v. Rowe Ford
Sales (February 13, 1991 Consent Decree settled State charges, with Rowe denying any wrongdoing, that Rowe Ford
failed to disclose to at least two shoppers over $2,000 in collision damage).
21
10 M.R.S.A. § 1475(3). If the previous owner of the car you are buying failed to tell the dealer about serious defects, do
you have any legal remedies? Not against the dealer, unless you can prove he knew about the defects but did not
disclose them. You may have a property damage tort action against the seller who deceived the dealer.
22
Nor can a dealer make verbal representations about the quality of the car and then, if the car proves defective, point to a
“merger” clause in the contract, which states that only the contract’s written terms matter and not any verbal promises or
representations. See DeLong v. Hilltop Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., 812 S.W.2d 834 (Mo.App. 1991).
23
See 10 M.R.S.A. § 1476; see also § 9.9, Your Legal Remedies.
MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE 9 - 7
warranty) within:24
(1) 5 calendar days, not counting weekends or holidays, after the car is delivered to the
dealer; or
(2) 35 days after delivery if the necessary parts are not available to the dealer (longer if
the parts are unavoidably delayed); or
C. The dealer fails to provide you with a loaner car at no cost (except for oil and gas) if
your car is still not repaired after the above times have expired.
If any of these standards are not met by the dealer, then you may be able to return the car and
receive all or most of your money back or obtain damages equal to your losses in your car’s value.
Remember, if you complained about a particular defect before the warranty expired, a dealer cannot
wait for the warranty to expire, and then charge you for the repair. By complaining before the warranty
runs out, you “freeze” your repair rights as to that defect.
If the dealer fails to perform his express or implied warranty obligations, you must give the dealer
written notice of this failure before you can bring a court action under the Used Car Information Act.
This notice must be sent by registered or certified mail.25
§ 9. 8. Transfer Of Warranties
Manufacturers are now offering quite lengthy express warranties. If you purchase a late model
used car, the manufacturer’s express warranty may still apply to you.26 Also, you may have implied
warranty protection from the manufacturer for any serious defects that were present when the car was
first sold.27 While state law allows used car dealers to disclaim implied warranties, manufacturers
cannot.28
§ 9. 9. Service Contracts
Car dealers will often attempt to sell service contracts to used car buyers. Service contracts are not
warranties (which are included in the cost of the item), but, rather, a promise to reimburse you for
covered repairs over and above a deductible. Make sure you understand who is liable either to perform
or pay for repairs under the terms of the auto service contract. It may be the manufacturer, the
dealership, or an independent company.
Many service contracts sold by dealers are actually handled by independent companies, called
administrators. These administrators act as claims adjusters, authorizing the payment of claims to any
dealers under the contract. Therefore, if you have a dispute over whether or not a claim should be paid,
you should deal with the administrator.
Are service contracts worth the money? Certainly they can bring a measure of peace of mind. But
they are often extremely high priced and do not always cover the problem you need repaired.
Furthermore, the service contract company might go out of business which would most likely result in
24
See Faulkingham v. Seacoast Subaru, Inc., 577 A.2d (Me. 1990) (buyer left car with the dealer for purpose of revoking
acceptance, rather then repair, and thus did not trigger five day repair period).
25
See 10 M.R.S.A § 1476. In addition to your Used Car Information Act remedies, you may also have the U.C.C. remedy
of “revocation” of ownership. See 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-608 and §§ 6.6-6.7 in this Guide.
26
See 11 M.R.S.A. § 2-318. A still existent express or implied warranty passes to the buyer of a used car if the buyer is “a
person whom the manufacturer, seller or supplier might reasonably have expected to use, consume or be affected by the
goods.”
27
See § 4.10 in this Guide.
28
See 10 M.R.S.A. § 1473.
9 – 8 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
your losing the price of the service contracted.29 Please note that the Magnusson-Moss Warranty Act
prohibits the dealer from disclaiming your implied warranty rights if the dealer sells you a service
contract within 90 days of your purchasing the car.30 Also keep in mind that many service contracts
have escape clauses that state that the vehicle is already covered under warranty, then the buyer must
first seek repair under the warranty (e.g., the dealer or the manufacturer) rather than repair under the
service contract. Thus, if you purchase a used car that is a few years old and which still carries the
manufacturer’s warranty, also purchasing a service contract may not be necessary.
The National Consumer Law Center in its 1997 Deceptive Practices and Warranties Report has the
following advice about Service Contracts:
[An] automobile dealer rip-off is the sale of a service contract or extended warranty at a
price several times the actual cost of this contract to the dealer. Even if the
manufacturer or other service contract company sets a suggested retail price, the dealer
will sell the contract for whatever it can get away with. The dealer pockets the
difference between what the consumer pays and what is sent to the service contract
company.
This practice is a clear Unfair Trade Practice violation, particularly if the dealer
misrepresents the charge. For example, the dealer’s sales agreement or loan forms may
state that the total service contract price is “an amount paid on your behalf” or “an
amount paid to another.” This is clearly false since part of the charge is kept by the
dealer. Similarly, oral representations by the dealer that this is the lowest it is allowed
to charge for the service contract, that the price is set by the manufacturer, or that the
price is a good deal are deceptive where the price in fact is higher than the suggested
retail price. Moreover, it may also be deceptive to fail to disclose the pricing
arrangement.
Truth in Lending is another approach to dealer over charges on service contracts....
Judge Posner provides a forceful explanation of the consumer injury implicit in the
practice:
The consumer would have a greater incentive to shop around for an
extended warranty, rather than take the one offered by the dealer, if he
realized that the dealer was charging what the defendant’s lawyer
described as a “commission,” and apparently a very sizeable one, for its
efforts in procuring the warranty from a third party. Or the consumer
might be more prone to haggle than if he thought that the entire fee had
been levied by a third party and so was outside the dealer’s direct control.
Or he might go to another dealer in search of lower mark-ups on third-
party charges.
See Gibson v. Bob Watson Chevrolet-GEO, Inc., 112F.3d 283 (7th Cir. 1997).
Even if your express warranty has expired, the dealer has disclaimed your implied warranties, and
29
If the administrator goes out of business, the dealership may still be obligated to perform under the contract. The reverse
also may be true. If the dealer goes out of business, the administrator may be required to fulfill the terms of the contract.
Whether you have recourse depends on your contract’s terms. You can also check with the Maine Bureau of Insurance
(1-800-300-5000 or 207-624-8457) to see if your service contract qualifies as “insurance.” If so, you may have
additional remedies. Another remedy is available where the service contract was sold in conjunction with the sale of the
vehicle and where the purchase was financed by a lender related to the seller within the terms of the FTC Holder Rule.
In such cases buyers can assert claims arising out of the sale of the service contract against the lender. The buyer can
demand that the lender credit his account in the amount of the claim. This remedy is especially useful where the service
contractor or seller goes out of business or fails to make a repair covered by the contract.
30
15 U.S.C. § 2308(b)(2).
MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE 9 - 9
you did not purchase a Service Contract, there may still be hope. The manufacturer may have issued a
Technical Service Bulletin (TSB) that will provide free fixes of defects discovered after the warranty
has expired. You can find out if such “secret” warranties exist by checking the following sources:
Search for Technical Service Bulletins (TSB) for your particular make and model vehicle.
31
See also Chapter 27 of this Guide, A Consumer’s Guide to Small Claims Court.
32
See 10 M.R.S.A. §§ 1476-1477.
9 – 10 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
(1) If the dealer refuses to make express warranty repairs or to repair the car so it can pass
inspection (see above, § 9.4), then you can:
(a) Return the car and get all your money back, less the value of any damage caused by your
mistreatment of the vehicle; or, if you’ve had the car for 30 days or more, you can return
the car and get your money back less the amount of money your car’s fair market value
has decreased due to normal use by you; or
(b) In the alternative, you can keep your car and sue for damages equal to the decrease in
value of the car caused by the dealer’s failure to meet his warranties (e.g., the cost of
repairs).
(2) In addition to any other remedy, if the dealer fails to post the history of the vehicle on the car
or otherwise comply with the requirements of the Used Car Information Law, the court will
order the dealer to pay you a civil penalty of between $100 and $1,000, plus costs and
attorneys fees,33 unless the dealer can show the violation was unintentional. This suit must be
filed within 2 years of the date on which the problem arose.
Please note: Before suing for breach of warranty, you must notify the dealer by registered or
certified mail to his business address, to notify him that he has failed to perform his warranty
obligations. Again, if you win, the court can award you your reasonable attorney fees.34
C. Unfair Trade Practices Act Remedies.
If you are buying the car for personal, family, or household use (not business), then under 10
M.R.S.A. § 1477 any violation of the duties described above is a per se (automatic) unfair trade
practice. Under 5 M.R.S.A. § 213, you have the right to go to Small Claims Court if the damage is
$4,500 or less, District Court, or Superior Court to sue for damages or restitution (your money back).
The court can also order the dealer to pay your reasonable attorney fees and the cost of filing the
suit.35 It can also be an Unfair Trade Practice if the dealer makes any significant oral or written (e.g.,
in an advertisement) misrepresentations. This is true even if the sales contract warns the buyer that
the dealer is not responsible for the oral statement of its sales person and that the written contract
terms are final. Why? Because an Unfair Trade Practices Act claim is not based on the written
contract but rather is based on dealer deceptive practices.
33
10 M.R.S.A. § 1477(3), liquidated damages; 10 M.R.S.A. § 1476(4). See James v. Witham, 573 A.2d 793 (Me. 1990)
(buyer who brought action against used car dealer to rescind contract for a defective truck entitled to attorney fees
incurred in defending dealers appeals to Superior Court and the Supreme Judicial Court).
34
See Thurber v. Bill Martin Chevrolet, Inc., 487 A.2d 631 (Me. 1985) (when a car was sold for transportation in violation
of the Used Car Information Act, the consumer received back his purchase price, a civil penalty and his attorney’s fees
— even though the contract specifically stated that the car was sold “as is/no state inspection/no warranty”).
35
See e.g., Wendi Arno v. Eddington Auto Sales, No.BAN-CV-97-437 (Me. District CT., Penobscot Cty, Nov.3, 1999)
(Defendants misrepresented vehicle in violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act and Used Car Information Act; the
court awarded the consumer the choice of either restitution or damages, and attorney fees); Hale v. Basin Motor Co. 795
P.2d 1006 (N.M. 1990) (unfair trade practice for a dealer to alter a vehicle without informing the buyer).
36
29-A M.R.S.A. § 2106.
MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE 9 - 11
Section: (207-624-9000 Extension 52138). See also Chapter 10 of this Guide, Consumer Rights
When You Suspect Odometer Tampering.
37
To prove an implied warranty violation you must show (1) that the car suffers from a serious manufacturer’s defect, (2)
that the car is still within its “useful life,” and (3) that the problem is not caused by abuse by you or an earlier owner.
For a guide to the implied warranty law and the “useful life” of different automobile components; see Chapter 4, § 4.3,
Implied Warranty of Merchantability. See also Suminski v. Maine Appliance Warehouse, Inc., 602 A.2d 1173 (Me.
1992) (an unmarketable battery may not render an entire vehicle unmerchantable).
38
10 M.R.S.A. § 1477.
9 – 12 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
motor vehicle dealer prior to the consummation of the purchase reveals to the
purchaser the substance of this paragraph;
(3) Representing and selling as a new motor vehicle, without disclosure, any motor
vehicle that has been used and operated for demonstration purposes or is otherwise a
used motor vehicle;
(4) Resorting to or using any false or misleading advertisement in connection with
business as a motor vehicle dealer;
(5) Failing to disclose conspicuously in writing the motor vehicle dealer’s policy in
relation to the return of deposits received from any person. A dealer shall require that
a person making a deposit sign the form on which the disclosure appears; or
(6) Failing to disclose in writing to a purchaser of a new motor vehicle before entering
into a sales contract that the new motor vehicle has been damaged and repaired if the
dealer has knowledge of the damage or repair or if the damage calculated at the retail
cost of repair to the new motor vehicle exceeds 5% of the manufacturer’s suggested
retail price, except that a new motor vehicle dealer is not required to disclose to a
purchaser that any glass, bumpers, audio system, instrument panel, communication
system or tires were damaged at any time if the glass, bumpers, audio system,
instrument panel, communication system or tires have been replaced with original or
comparable equipment.
39
Since these Rules were issued, the Maine Legislature has enacted legislation which states dealers do not have to disclose
collision damage that costs less than $2,000 to repair. See §§ 9.6 (F); 10 M.R.S.A. § 1475(3).
40
Verbal misrepresentations may be in violation of common law or statutory law, such as the Maine Unfair Trade
Practices Act or the Maine Uniform Commercial Code.
MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE 9 - 17
41
Dealers are now allowed to display inspection stickers during the prior 60 days.
9 – 18 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
(vi) If the vehicle is still under the manufacturer’s original warranty, you may add the following
paragraph below the “Full/Limited Warranty” disclosure: “MANUFACTURER’S WARRANTY
STILL APPLIES. The manufacturer’s original warranty has not expired on the vehicle. Consult the
manufacturer’s warranty booklet for details as to warranty coverage, service location, etc.”
(vii) If, following negotiations, you and the buyer agree to changes in the warranty coverage, mark the
changes on the form, as appropriate. If you first offer the vehicle with a warranty, but then sell it
without one, cross out the original warranty offer and mark the “No Express Warranty” box. If your
express warranty required the consumer to pay a deductible, enter the amount and terms on the line
provided.
(i) Service Contracts. If you make a service contract available on the vehicle, you must mark the box
provided below the warranty disclosure area.
(j) Implied Warranties. In many cases you may disclaim the protection provided consumers by the Maine
implied warranty laws. These laws include the Warranty of Merchantability (i.e., the vehicle is fit for the
ordinary purposes for which such vehicles are used) and the Warranty of Fitness (i.e., you know the
consumer is relying on your specific advice as to whether the car is fit for a particular purpose).
Assuming the car is still within its useful life and has not been abused by its other owners, if you have
not disclaimed implied warranties (by checking the “No” box), you may be responsible for:
(i) Repairing defects in materials or workmanship that were not apparent when you sold the vehicle; or
(ii) For accepting the car back if it is not fit for the specific purpose you advised it was suitable for.
However, pursuant to the Magnuson-Moss Warrant Act (15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq.), under certain
circumstances your right to limit implied warranties is not absolute. For example, if you offer a
dealer express warranty, then you may only limit implied warranties to the duration of the express
warranty and, if you wish to so limit them, you should check that box. Further, you may not disclaim
or limit implied warranties at all if you sell the customer a service contract for the used car within 90
days of the sale of the car. For example, if you sell the purchaser a service contract, you cannot
disclaim implied warranties and should not check the Implied Warranty “No” box.
(k) Important Information: Prior Owner’s Name Is Available From the Dealer Upon Request. Maine law
requires the dealer to promptly disclose, upon request of any person, the name and address of the previous
owner of the motor vehicle.
(l) Vehicle Returned to Manufacturer. If a used vehicle has been returned to a manufacturer because of
warranty defects, you must give consumers any details known to you.
(m) Complaints. In the space provided under “Notice of Breach of Warranty” put the name, title and
telephone number of the person who should be contacted if any complaints arise after sale. If warranty
repairs are not to be performed at your dealership, you must put the name, address and other identifying
information of each facility within a radius of 50 miles of the dealer’s place of business to which the
vehicle may be brought for repairs, replacement of parts and other service under the warranty
D. WINDOW FORM GIVEN TO BUYER
1. Form given to buyer. Give the buyer of a used vehicle sold by you the window form described above
containing all of the disclosures required by the Rule and reflecting the warranty coverage agreed upon. If you prefer, you
may give the buyer a copy of the original, so long as that copy accurately reflects all of the disclosures required by the
Rule and the warranty coverage agreed upon.
2. Incorporated into contract. The information on the final version of the window form is incorporated into the
contract of sale for each used vehicle you sell to a consumer. Information on the window form overrides any contrary
provisions in the contract of sale. To inform the consumer of these facts, include the following language in 10 pt. bold
caps in each consumer contract of sale. The information you see on the window form for this vehicle is part of this
contract. Information on the window form overrides any contrary provisions in the contract of sale.
3. Contrary statements. You may not make any statements, oral or written, or take other actions which alter or
contradict the disclosure required above
4. Warranty negotiations. You may negotiate over warranty coverage, as long as the final warranty terms are
described in the contract of sale and summarized on the copy of the window form you give to the buyer.
MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE 9 - 19
BASIS STATEMENT
In P.L. 1985, c. 265, the Maine Legislature authorized the Division of Motor Vehicles to promulgate Rules relating to
the Used Car Information Act, 10 M.R.S.A. § 1474 (1980 & Supp. 1985-86), Disclosure of Information. These Rules were
primarily designed to establish uniform dealer disclosure forms and stickers for the sale of used cars and were to include
information required by Maine statutes as well as information required by the U. S. Federal Trade Commission’s Motor
Vehicle Trade Regulation Rule, published in 16 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 455.
These Rules thus combine requirements of Maine and Federal disclosure requirements in the sale of used cars. The
reason such disclosures are necessary is well summarized in the Federal Trade Commission’s “Introduction” to its
disclosure requirements, found at 49 Fed. Reg. 45692 (1984).
In recent years, more than ten million used cars have been sold annually by franchised and independent dealers. For
many consumers, the purchase of a used car represents a substantial, necessary investment in a reliable means of
transportation. Despite the significance of this investment and the relative unfamiliarity of most consumers with the
mechanical operation of an automobile, many used car buyers currently receive little accurate warranty and mechanical
condition information to assist them in their purchase. Consumers’ ability to obtain this information has been hampered by
various unfair and deceptive practices identified during the course of this rule making proceeding. The record establishes
that these practices have resulted in substantial consumer injury in the used car market.
Warranty Complaint
Enforcement and Compliance
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D C 20460
202-566-1514
www.epa.gov/compliance/complaints.html
Tune-up..................................................................................15,000-25,000 miles
Valves ....................................................................................75,000-100,000 miles
Windshield Washer Pump .....................................................70,000-90,000 miles
Water Pump ...........................................................................60,000-80,000 miles
Wheel Bearing .......................................................................50,000 (repacked every 25,000 miles)
Windshield Wiper Motor.......................................................70,000-90,000 miles
*depends on road conditions
One of the most widespread abuses in the sale of motor vehicles today is the dealer practice of
“spot delivery.” The consumer signs all the sale and loan papers and goes home with the vehicle.
But, in the dealers’ mind, the deal is not final if the dealer is not happy with its ability to sell the
consumer’s car loan to another lender.
“Spot delivery” by a dealer can be an unfair sales technique to close a deal even though the
dealer is not sure it can obtain financing. The dealer does not want the consumer to re-think the deal
while financing is arranged, so it turns over the car on the spot, not disclosing that the deal, from the
dealer’s point of view, is not final. In order to protect consumers from unfair “spot” deliveries,
Maine law42 now requires a dealer who has made a “spot” delivery and who then later informs the
consumer that the agreed upon financing could not be obtained to return to the consumer the
following:
A. Reimbursement of the entire vehicle purchase price or, if a leased vehicle, the lease
payments made to date, including any paid finance charges on the purchased or leased
vehicle;
B. Reimbursement of all charges pertinent to the contract, including, but not limited to, sales
tax, license and registration fees and similar government charges;
42
10 M.R.S.A. § 1194. Violation of this statute is prima facie (presumptive) evidence of an unfair trade practice, 5
M.R.S.A. § 217.
9 – 22 MAINE CONSUMER LAW GUIDE
C. The vehicle traded in or, if the vehicle is not available, the trade-in value of the vehicle
established in the contract.
Further, if the dealer did not inform the consumer of these reimbursement rights, the dealer is
prohibited from canceling the sale.
The “buy rate” is never disclosed to the consumer, nor the fact that the dealer is making a
profit on the financing. Quite the opposite is true - the dealer gives the impression that the
interest rate it quotes and that is specified on the retail installment contract is mandated by the
lender, that the consumer’s full monthly payment will go to the lender. The consumer is
unaware that the dealer is quoting an interest rate that will maximize profit for the dealer, and is
not the lowest rate that the lender is willing to offer to that consumer.