Research Paper On Sand
Research Paper On Sand
A R T I C LE I N FO A B S T R A C T
Keywords: In this paper, a type of typical locally available manufactured sand (MS) was utilized, and its effect on the
Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) properties of Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) were studied, based on physical and chemical points of
Manufactured sands views. According to the modified Andreasen and Andresen [1] (MAA) model, the natural river sand (RS) were
Flowability partially replaced by manufactured sand to design UHPC. Then, the properties of the developed UHPC were
Heat of hydration
evaluated. The obtained experimental results shown that the addition of angular MS can disturb the particle
Porosity
packing skeleton of UHPC. Moreover, the flowability and volume stability of the developed UHPC can also be
negatively affected by the inclusion of MS. Especially the UHPC autogenous shrinkage, which could be even
increased by 39.2%, when 50% of RS was replaced by MS. Additionally, based on the chemical reaction and
microstructure development points of view, the use of MS at replacement levels up to 50% has limited influence
on the hydration process and pore size distribution of UHPC, while the micro-hardness and SEM measurements
showed that the connection of cementitious matrix with MS was more compact than that with RS, which should
be attributed to the typical surface characteristics of the utilized MS particles.
1. Introduction some provinces even have no river sand resources (e.g. Guizhou).
Therefore, to widen the application of UHPC, it is important to find
Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) is one of the most ad- some easily available substitute aggregates to replace river sand in
vanced cement-based construction material. It has outstanding me- producing UHPC, especially in the river sand resource-poor areas.
chanical and durability properties, such as compressive strength [2,3], Manufactured sand (MS) is a kind of artificial fine aggregates from
malleability [4,5], impact resistance [6], chloride penetration re- natural stone based on a series of breaking and grinding techniques.
sistance and freezing-thawing resistance [7–9], which has been applied Due to the difference among mother rock composition during crushing,
to the pre-stressed hybrid pedestrian bridge, beams and road bridge. A and the reduction ratio, the produced MS grains normally show dis-
representative UHPC mixture proportion consist of binders, aggregates, tinctive particle shapes compared to natural river sand [25–30]. In
chemical admixtures, and a small amount of water [10–13]. In this general, the crushing process tends to produce sharp edged, and an-
highly packed particles skeleton, the aggregate plays an important role gular particles. Compared with more rounded natural sands, the rough-
in normal concrete and UHPC, the aggregate could directly affect me- angular particles in MS can yield a granular critical state friction angle
chanical and durability properties in normal concrete [14–17], simi- [31–34]. To clearly understand the influence of MS on the properties of
larly, the aggregate also affect these properties of UHPC [18,19]. concrete, many investigations have been executed and shown in
Nowadays, based on available literature, the most widely used fine available literature [35–40]. For instance, Shen et al. [41] studied the
aggregates in UHPC was natural river sand [20,21]. However, one characterization of MS, for example, surface properties, particle shape,
alarming fact, which should never be ignored, that the natural river and behavior in concrete. Prakash et al. [42] studied the mechanical
sand is non-renewable resource. In some regions, RS has already been properties of MS concrete and RS concrete. The experimental results
exceedingly exploited, which has threatened the safety of bridges, the presented that the mechanical properties of MS concrete were better
stability of river banks, and ecological system [22–24]. Besides, the than RS concrete. Donza et al. [43] investigated the effect of MS on the
natural river sand is a typical local material. For instance, in China, mechanical properties of concrete. The results shown that the shape and
∗
Corresponding author. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, 430070, China.
E-mail address: r.yu@whut.edu.cn (R. Yu).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2019.03.020
Received 27 December 2018; Received in revised form 14 March 2019; Accepted 19 March 2019
Available online 23 March 2019
0958-9465/ © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
Table 1
Chemical composition of the used powders in this study (wt. %).
Compositions Na2O MgO Al2O3 SiO2 P2O5 SO3 K2 O CaO Fe2O3 LOI
C 0.09 1.61 4.18 19.2 0.09 3.35 0.78 64.93 3.32 2.49
SF 0.13 0.47 0.25 94.65 0.17 0.69 0.84 0.36 0.15 2.29
FA 0.33 0.23 38.01 46.44 0.06 0.69 0.88 7.5 3.12 2.79
Fig. 2. SEM images of natural river sand (RS) and manufactured sand (MS).
204
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
Fig. 3. The surface roughness of natural river sand (RS) and manufactured sand (MS).
investigations regarding UHPC with MS were more focusing on the 2. Materials and methods
macro properties and practical application, while the intrinsic me-
chanisms and micro-level studies were less executed. For example: 1) 2.1. Materials
the effect of MS angular particles on the particle packing skeleton of
UHPC; 2) the influence of included fine powders from MS on the hy- First of all, CEM II, silica fume, and fly ash were used as binder
dration process of UHPC, and so on. Therefore, to obtain enough the- materials in this study. Their chemical constitutions were displayed in
oretical guidance for an application of UHPC with MS in the future, a Table 1. Then, two types of natural sands (0–0.6 mm and 0.6–1.25 mm
deeper investigation of physical and chemical characteristics of UHPC RS) and two types of manufactured sands (0–0.6 mm and
with MS was needed. 0.6–1.25 mm MS) were applied here. At last, the workability of UHPC
Based on the premises mentioned above, the object of this study to was adjusted by superplasticizer (polycarboxylic-ether based, solid
clarify the physical and chemical characteristics of locally available content of 20% and the water-reducing capacity of PCE was greater
manufactured sands induced impacts on properties of UHPC. The MS than 30%).
was utilized to partially replace RS by 10–50% in producing UHPC. To clearly understand the difference between RS and MS, a series of
Then, the macro and micro properties of the developed UHPC were tests were executed and the obtained results were shown as follows. For
evaluated, such as flowability, mechanical properties, micro-hardness, instance, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of fine aggregates were
pore structure and microstructure development. showed in Fig. 1. As can be noticed, the main composition of RS (mainly
SiO2) and MS (mainly CaCO3) was different. Fig. 2 shown the Scanning
Electron Microscopic (SEM) images of RS and MS particles. It is clear
that the RS grain has round appearance, smooth surface and relatively
205
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
Fig. 5. Particle size distribution of the solid constituents and optimized grading
Fig. 4. The shape coefficient of the natural river sand (RS) and manufactured curves of different mixtures.
sand (MS).
Table 2
good regularity, while the MS has rough surface, sharp edges and cor- Mix proportion of UHPC (kg/m3).
ners. Fig. 3 illustrated the roughness of the RS and MS. As can be seen,
Mixture C SF F RS0-0.6 RS0.6-1.25 MS0-0.6 MS0.6-1.25 W SP
the tested average roughness of the RS and MS were 30.64 μm and
39.31 μm, respectively. This obtained experimental results were in ac- RS100 750 144 200 770 220 0 0 210 45
cordance with that from SEM observation (as shown in Fig. 4), in which RS10-1 750 144 200 693 220 77 0 210 45
RS10-2 750 144 200 770 198 0 22 210 45
the angularly index and form 2D results of RS and MS were presented.
RS10-3 750 144 200 693 198 77 22 210 45
Compared to that of RS, the MS has larger angularity index and form 2D RS20-1 750 144 200 616 220 176 0 210 45
values, which implies that the utilized MS particle was angular and non- RS20-2 750 144 200 770 176 0 44 210 45
spherical. The particle size distributions (PSDs) of the utilized MS and RS20-3 750 144 200 616 176 176 44 210 45
RS were presented in Fig. 5. It can be noticed that in the particle size RS30-1 750 144 200 539 220 231 0 210 45
RS30-2 750 144 200 770 154 0 66 210 45
range of 0.6–1.25 mm, the PSD of MS was quite similar as that of RS. RS30-3 750 144 200 539 154 231 66 210 45
Nevertheless, in the range of 0–0.6 mm, the particle size of MS was RS40-1 750 144 200 462 220 308 0 210 45
much smaller than that of RS, which means more fine powders were RS40-2 750 144 200 770 132 0 66 210 45
included in the MS. This could be attributed to the cracking and RS40-3 750 144 200 462 132 308 88 210 45
RS50-1 750 144 200 385 220 385 0 210 45
grinding technique processes of MS production.
RS50-2 750 144 200 770 110 0 110 210 45
RS50-3 750 144 200 385 110 385 110 210 45
2.2. Experimental methodology
(C: cement, F: fly ash, SF: silica fume, RS0-0.6 and RS0.6-1.25: natural river sand
0–0.6 mm and 0.6–1.25 mm, MS0-0.6 and MS0.6-1.25: manufactured sand
2.2.1. UHPC mix design method and sample preparation
0–0.6 mm and 0.6–1.25 mm, W: water, SP: superplasticizer).
In this research, the UHPC mixture design was based on the closest
packing theory, by employing MAA model [1]. The detailed calculation
method was referred to literature [13].
206
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
Table 3
Deviation of mixture.
Mixture RS100 RS50-1 RS50-2 RS50-3
207
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
208
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
209
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
210
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
than 2%). Hence, it may be summarized that, based on chemical re- noticed, the results were obviously different between the RS and MS
action point of view, the effect of included MS particles (especially the specimens. The micro-hardness of the MS sample around the aggregate
fine particles < 125 μm) on UHPC pore structure on nano scale was reached a level of 122.55 MPa, whereas the value for RS sample was
quite small. To test this hypothesis, further testing was conducted and only 114.19 MPa. A view based on materials science, such behavior of
were reported in the following two subsections. specimen prepared with the MS due to higher crystallinite proportion in
the MS. According to Perkins [60], increased crystallinite usually re-
sults in Young's modulus and a higher yield stress. It can also be said
3.5. Isothermal calorimetry
that densification of microstructure-likely because of the MS char-
acteristics-strengthens the matrix by improving the contact point in-
To clarify the influence of MS particles (especially the very fine
teractions in its constituent.
particles) on the cement hydration in UHPC, the hydration kinetic of
It is well-known that the presence of rigid and well-bonded stiff
the developed UHPC was investigated based on isothermal calorimetry,
inclusions or other inhomogeneities can restrain the stress fields de-
and the obtained results were presented in Fig. 13. In general, the hy-
veloped under the indenter, leading to an indentation size that is
dration heat release rate curve and cumulative heat release curve for
smaller than would be expected from the nature of the paste alone, and
RS100 and RS50-3 were similar to each other, which imply that the
thus the hardness of the paste was expected to increase [61].
included fine particles from MS have limited effect on cement hydration
To observe the ITZ between aggregate and cement paste, the
in UHPC. This result was consistent with previous researches [59].
backscatter scanning electron was used in this study, and the results
Hence, it can be summarized that although the fine particles
were presented in Fig. 15. As can be seen, there were obvious cracks in
(< 125 μm) from MS can absorb free water and increase autogenous
the ITZ between RS and paste, while the cracks were difficult to be
shrinkage of UHPC, they have very limited influence on cement hy-
found in the MS sample. This were mainly due to the nature of the
dration and most likely act as filler in the developed UHPC. This con-
surface properties and particles shape of aggregate. As shown in Fig. 2,
clusion was also in a line with that shown in Section 3.4 in this study.
regular shape and smooth surface for the RS particle can be noticed,
while the MS was multi-angled and its surface was rough. During the
3.6. Microstructure development and ITZ analysis cement hydration process, the rough surface and edges of MS were
beneficial for obtaining a better connection between the paste and ag-
As mentioned above, on one hand the included MS can improve the gregate. Moreover, the multi-edges may also cause the interlocking
mechanical properties of the developed UHPC, on the one hand the fine between MS particles, which could further improve the binding force
particles in MS have almost no effect on hydration kinetics of UHPC. between paste and aggregate. Hence, it can be summarized that the
Hence, to clearly understand the reason of compressive strength im- typical physical characteristics of MS were the key factor to obtain
provement for the developed UHPC, its microstructure development UHPC with advanced mechanical properties and optimized micro-
and ITZ were studied and discussed in this section. structure.
Based on the obtained results, the micro-hardness measured in the
ITZ of each mix was plotted around aggregate in Fig. 14. As can be
211
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
212
R. Yang, et al. Cement and Concrete Composites 99 (2019) 203–213
(2011) 353–358. Standards Institution-BSI and CEN European Committee for Standardization, 2005.
[39] M. Sahmaran, H.E. Yücel, S. Demirhan, M.T. Arýk, V.C. Li, Combined effect of [51] Chinese Standard-GB/T 50082-2009: Standard for Test Methods of Long-Term
aggregate and mineral admixtures on tensile ductility of engineered cementitious Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete, General Administration of
composites, ACI Mater. J. 109 (6) (2012) 627. Quality Supervision. Inspection and Quarantine, P.R. China, 2009 in Chinese.
[40] R. Cepuritis, S. Jacobsen, B. Pedersen, E. Mørtsell, Crushed sand in concrete-effect [52] W. Zhu, P.J. Bartos, Application of depth-sensing microindentation testing to study
of particle shape in different fractions and filler properties on rheology, Cement of interfacial transition zone in reinforced concrete, Cement Concr. Res. 30 (8)
Concr. Compos. 71 (2016) 26–41. (2000) 1299–1304.
[41] W. Shen, Z. Yang, L. Cao, L. Cao, Y. Liu, H. Yang, et al., Characterization of man- [53] S. Igarashi, A. Bentur, S. Mindess, Microhardness testing of cementitious materials,
ufactured sand: particle shape, surface texture and behavior in concrete, Constr. Adv. Cem. Base Mater. 4 (2) (1996) 48–57.
Build. Mater. 114 (2016) 595–601. [54] M. Sonebi, Utilization of micro-indentation technique to determine the micro-
[42] D. Prakash Rao, V. Giridhar Kumar, Investigations on concrete with stone crusher mechanical properties of ITZ in cementitious materials, Proceeding of ACI Session
dust as fine aggregate, Indian Concr. J. (2004) 45–50 July. on ‘Nanotechnology of Concrete: Recent Developments and Future Perspective
[43] V. Bonavetti, H. Donza, V. Rahhal, E. Irassar, High-strength concrete with limestone (2006) 57–68.
filler cements, Spec. Publ. 186 (1999) 567–580. [55] M. Vijayalakshmi, A. Sekar, Strength and durability properties of concrete made
[44] M. Westerholm, B. Lagerblad, J. Silfwerbrand, E. Forssberg, Influence of fine ag- with granite industry waste, Constr. Build. Mater. 46 (2013) 1–7.
gregate characteristics on the rheological properties of mortars, Cement Concr. [56] M. Sahmaran, M. Lachemi, K.M. Hossain, R. Ranade, V.C. Li, Influence of aggregate
Compos. 30 (4) (2008) 274–282 2008. type and size on ductility and mechanical properties of engineered cementitious
[45] B. Li, G. Ke, M. Zhou, Influence of manufactured sand characteristics on strength composites, ACI Mater. J. 106 (3) (2009) 308.
and abrasion resistance of pavement cement concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (10) [57] J.P. Gonçalves, L.M. Tavares, R.D. Toledo Filho, E.M.R. Fairbairn, E.R. Cunha,
(2011) 3849–3853. Comparison of natural and manufactured fine aggregates in cement mortars,
[46] K. Wille, C. Boisvert-Cotulio, Material efficiency in the design of ultra-high per- Cement Concr. Res. 37 (6) (2007) 924–932.
formance concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 86 (2015) 33–43. [58] A.M. Neville, J.J. Brooks, Concrete Technoloy, first ed., Longman UK, 1987, p. 438.
[47] H. Sobuz, P. Visintin, M.M. Ali, M. Singh, M. Griffith, A. Sheikh, Manufacturing [59] T. Celik, K. Marar, Effects of crushed stone dust on some properties of concrete,
ultra-high performance concrete utilising conventional materials and production Cement Concr. Res. 26 (7) (1996) 1121–1130.
methods, Constr. Build. Mater. 111 (2016) 251–261. [60] W.G. Perkins, Polymer toughness and impact resistance, Polym. Eng. Sci. 39 (1999)
[48] S. Pyo, H.-K. Kim, B.Y. Lee, Effects of coarser fine aggregate on tensile properties of 2445–2460.
ultra-high performance concrete, Cement Concr. Compos. 84 (2017) 28–35. [61] S. Erdem, A.R. Dawson, N.H. Thom, Influence of the micro-and nanoscale local
[49] BS-EN-1015-3, Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry-Part 3: Determination of mechanical properties of the interfacial transition zone on impact behavior of
Consistence of Fresh Mortar (By Flow Table), British Standards Institution-BSI and concrete made with different aggregates, Cement Concr. Res. 42 (2) (2012)
CEN European Committee for Standardization, 2007. 447–458.
[50] BS-EN-196-1, Methods of Testing Cement-Part 1: Determination of Strength, British
213