Available online www.ejaet.

com
European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 2022, 9(11): 82-88

Research Article ISSN: 2394-658X

Automating Infrastructure Management with Terraform:

Strategies and Impact on Business Efficiency

Chandrakanth Lekkala

Email id - Chan.Lekkala@gmail.com

ABSTRACT
In this paper, we investigate how Terraform, as a tool for Infrastructure as Code (IaC), automates cloud
infrastructure management to provide cost efficiency and operational stability. Terraform allows one to fine-
tune deployment cycles and minimize manual overhead, such as provisioning or maintaining Infrastructure,
which are important parts of any truly scalable and resilient cloud environment. The case studies have pointed
towards phenomenal augmentation in business efficiency, with Terraform automation largely reducing the time
taken for deployment processes and associated human errors, operation costs, and others. These findings
underline Terraform's transformational potential in cloud infrastructure management—something that indicates
strategic use to be crucial for organizations that need optimal cloud operations without too much financial
overhead.

Key words: Terraform, Infrastructure Management

INTRODUCTION
Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is an approach to managing infrastructures automatically through coding rather than
manual procedures [1]. This will help with easy infrastructure setup, hardware, software environment
management and maintenance, and an accessible, consistent, scalable infrastructure across deployments. This
has taken on increased importance as organizations move to cloud-based solutions, where the ability to quickly
and reliably replicate environments can directly translate into agility of operations and reliability of services.
Engineers can implement version control, continuous integration, and deployment practices by codifying
Infrastructure—core to the modern DevOps strategy [2]. This way, it also enables better audit trails and
compliance with security standards, a must in highly regulated industries.
However, plenty of unautomated infrastructure management challenges may hamper organizational growth and
operational efficiency. This is because the manual nature of these traditional methods makes setup and fine-
tuning a very time-consuming effort apart from being highly error-prone [3]. Consequences may include
inconsistencies between operating environments, leading to application failures and business outcomes due to
downtime. Automation will eliminate human errors in the manual process of scaling and maintenance, which are
cumbersome and hence the problems that would result in raised operational costs and impaired reliability.
Automation will also make it very hard for businesses to reduce deployment cycles.
With this in mind, terraform tries to bring out resolute business efficiency using automation tools. Terraform
allows an organization to describe its Infrastructure through an elevated configuration language, which is then
taken to form an accurate and reproducible infrastructure at the service provider level [4]. This dramatically
reduces the time and costs of deployment and enhances operational stability since many variabilities linked to
manual procedures have been removed. An automation study in infrastructure management with Terraform
showed that organizations are faster in deployment, saving money, ensuring keeping up with industry standards,
and overall efficiency in business processes [5].

82
Lekkala C Euro. J. Adv. Engg. Tech., 2022, 9(11): 82-88
______________________________________________________________________________
LITERATURE REVIEW
Two incredible transitions in infrastructure management over the last couple of decades have left behind laborious,
manual, error-prone configurations fraught with inefficiencies, moving to a more sophisticated, automated approach.
These have led to Infrastructure as Code (IaC): a tectonic shift in the way Infrastructure is to be provisioned and
managed. One of the biggest companies in this space is Terraform. It has applied the IaC ideology and, more
importantly, successfully reinvented how firms manage their IT infrastructures. According to a study [6], Terraform
abstracts configuration for all types of infrastructure resources and describes them as code, giving practitioners the
ability to define, deploy, and manage infrastructure resources in a repeatable, scalable, and efficient way; hence,
operations get smoothed out, increasing overall agility.
Until recently, infrastructure management was largely a labor-intensive exercise carried out by system
administrators, who manually set up and configure servers, network devices, and storage solutions [7 - 8]. It could
not easily scale with changing business demands or offer the flexibility that compromised operational efficiency and
responsiveness for businesses toward quicker market changes and rising pressures for agility. A study [9 10]
demonstrates thatvirtualization technology has brought great relief to such users in that it supports applications that
run on a single physical hardware setup by creating virtual machines. That reduced dependency on hardware and
increased resource utilization. However, the manual, time-consuming effort taken to set up and maintain it, and
more so with the challenges of management in traditional infrastructure, is still in place.
This was followed by automation tools such as Puppet, Chef, and Ansible, purposely designed to automate
variousfunctions in configuration management [11]. These tools greatly reduced the manual workload and
minimized human error during the deployment by using scripts for automated management and configuration of the
systems. For instance, Puppet makes the definition of the state of one's IT infrastructure possible and then enforces
the wanted configuration automatically [12]. Chef turns infrastructure into code through automation on how
Infrastructure is deployed, configured, and managed across a network, regardless of size [13]. Ansible operates on
making complex deployments easier by doing multiple things in a single flow without requiring an agent. However,
most of these systems entailed a level of complexity that required quite a bit of user technical knowledge and was
hence applicable only to users withthe right technical competencies to deploy and use the tools effectively.

Out of these evolving infrastructure management tools, HashiCorpdeveloped Terraform, which has led to a new way
of handling infrastructure. Unlike predecessors, the intention with Terraform is that of a low-level configuration
syntax that should be clear and declarative [14]. Infrastructure resources can now be deployed and managed with
automation. Terraform methodology treats Infrastructure as code, versioned and controlled like software
development practices. This helps to keep the same output consistent in each of these different environments:
development, staging, and production, to optimize operational efficiencies and minimize the human error factor.

83
Lekkala C Euro. J. Adv. Engg. Tech., 2022, 9(11): 82-88
______________________________________________________________________________

This makes the Infrastructure codified by Terraform, making it easy to reproduce and manage on multiple
frameworks.
The codification makes the environments consistent and maintainable, reducing common problems like
configuration drift, where the environments become increasingly diverse in unintentional ways over time. Managing
the entire infrastructure lifecycle, from provisioning and deployment to updates and maintenance, is streamlined and
greatly increases the efficiency of handling complex procedures through code.
Integrating Terraform with major cloud providers simplifies the process even more. It enables businesses to adopt a
more flexible infrastructure strategy that can quickly respond to changes in technology and business. Terraform will
inherently work with major cloud service providers like AWS, Google Cloud, or Azure. This interaction gives the
user a single platform to manage various resource types without worrying about vendor lock-in. Since Terraform
follows a single configuration syntax, it has a much wider platform reach and manages the operational efficiencies
of a heterogeneous environment. In addition, predictability from Terraform's planning and application phasesallows
organizations to meticulously manage the infrastructure changes to keep pace with stability and adherence to very
tight regulatory standards, making it a must-have tool for continuous compliance and operational continuity .

84
Lekkala C Euro. J. Adv. Engg. Tech., 2022, 9(11): 82-
88
____________________________________________________________________________
__
Automation using Terraform drastically reduces the time to deploy cloud infrastructure, reducing costs and
operation risks [15]. Terraform allows easy deployment for multiple operational regions and infrastructure
scripting; therefore, management through code is automatic. This automation also relieves teams from the tiring,
repetitive setup, giving them time for innovation and strategic initiatives. The resultant business efficiency will be
quite large, and any business can deploy and manage its infrastructure well to ensure optimal resource usage
across the enterprise.

METHODOLOGY
Case Study
Adobe
The case of Adobe in how it implemented Terraform to help manage the Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Cloud Service has meant the passage to an infrastructure-as-code tool that significantly increases their operative
capacities. Terraform enabled Adobe to automatically set up and scale new AEM environments while better
managing the existing ones. It was a critical transition for Adobe, as it reduced the manual overhead, scaled up the
efficiency in handling an environment, and increased its capability to handle complex and large-scale
environments. With the automated processes for deployment, there could be no variance in the setup from one
operation to another, reducing the potential for errors through human intervention and speeding up deployments
and updates. This has enabled Adobe to scale its operations to respond better to the high global demand of its
growing user base, not subjecting itself to the risks associated with a lack of reliability and performance [16].

Figure 1 likely illustrates Adobe's use of Terraform for managing its AEM Cloud Service infrastructure. It
represents an automated workflow, with Terraform at the center, enabling Adobe to orchestrate efficiently and
provision resources across various environments.

85
Lekkala C Euro. J. Adv. Engg. Tech., 2022, 9(11): 82-
88
____________________________________________________________________________
__
Figure 2 could represent the impact of Terraform on Adobe's code quality over time. The dashboard suggests a
significant decrease in code issues, reflecting enhanced stability and performance of Adobe's AEM Cloud Service
following the implementation of Terraform.

Infrastructure Automation Using Terraform for Roblox

Roblox, deployed using HashiCorp's Terraform infrastructure, has managed to be both agile and responsive in
online games' rapidly changing, dynamic, pulsating world. With its expansive global reach connecting millions of
players within thousands of digital experiences, managing such a sprawling system across multiple cloud
providers proved uniquely challenging. Terraform has solved this challenge by allowing Roblox to manage and
automate its cloud infrastructure effectively. Using Terraform, Roblox could orchestrate complicated deployments
and updates at a very high rate, thus never causing any interruption within their large user base playing games.
Using Terraform, this scaling up and down to changes in demand for their services can be responded to very
quickly by Roblox [17]. Such a high level of elasticity is essential to ensure performance during peakusage times
or after launching new features that trigger a sudden surge of player activity [20]. Through automating its
infrastructure management, Roblox has reduced manual processes, minimized the possibility of errors, and
achieved a more predictable and stable environment [18]. It demonstrates that Terraform can bring one powerful
way of managing multi-cloud implementation with robustness and scalability in fast-moving technological
landscapes where user experience is in focus.

Effectiveness of terraform
The paper by GlebGurbatov is a systematic study of the effectiveness of Terraform in the OpenStack environment,
mainly focusing on the lifecycle and security management of modifiable infrastructures. From the given
investigation, quite a pool of quantitative and qualitative data is evident, which gives the indicators of the fact that,
while it is the case that Terraform consumes fewer system resources as compared to Ansible, Terraform is also
limited within the configuration management modules. Terraform had issues running continuous security
management because its configuration management modules did not have idempotency, and the system execution
did not include appropriate callbacks. This, therefore, reduced the capability of continuous security management
operations in the orchestrated service.
In resource utilization testing, Terraform was far more efficient than Ansible. It consumed considerably lower
CPU and memory resources at the execution node than Ansible. Ansible's life cycle elapsed time was less than
20% [17]. The overall study can arguably provide credence to the argument that Terraform was not of good
enough quality as a standalone orchestrator for stateful service architectures, even though it could orchestrate
more cloud entities with lower demand per execution. However, Terraform could be more efficient for some types
of architecture, especially those not demanding configuration management interrelationships, e.g., real-time
streaming services.

DISCUSSION

86
Lekkala C Euro. J. Adv. Engg. Tech., 2022, 9(11): 82-
88
____________________________________________________________________________
__
As in the case studies of Adobe and Roblox, integrating Terraform with cloud infrastructure brings out high
automation and significant streamlining ability for very complex environments. Leveraging Terraform
capabilities, Adobe has automated traditional manual management of its Adobe Experience Manager Cloud
Service into an automated and codified one. This, in turn, reduced the manual overhead and made Adobe much
better at scaling the operations and maintaining large environments more stably. For instance, Adobe has been
able to codify its Infrastructure with Terraform, which has laid down reproducible environments leading to
shrinking deployment times, stabilizing operations, decreasing the probability for human error, and this, in turn,
has contributed toward a more robust business model and service delivery.
Embracing Terraform today by Roblox only emphasizes those benefits, as in its adoption of Terraform, it can now
quickly and seamlessly manage its gargantuan, multi-cloud Infrastructure, which is a must for it to support its
global user community. Quick response to service demands and resource scaling are traits that Terraform has
instilled into its employees as aspects of agility and resilience [19]. To a degree, responsiveness isessential at an
online gaming platform, where user engagement is sensitive to performance and uptime. Terraform brings
automation into the deployment, making it more rapid and offering a more predictable and stable operational
landscape. The illustrative power of Terraform is observed in Roblox's fine and matured deployment strategies,
which call for a strong use of Terraform for an unbroken, seamless experience in gaming.
Terraform is resource-efficient, and within the automation literature of cloud infrastructure, it's notably effective
for low operational overhead. It's most effective compared to traditional manual methodologies or even against
other automation tools. The design of Terraform is vital in such an environment where low intricate
interdependency of cloud resource management is expected, which aligns the stateless application and services
without requiring frequent updates or changes. Where the significant aspect is continuous configuration, the
limitations of Terraform set in. These limitations give rise to a critical area for future improvement: Terraform's
feature scope can be extended to advanced support of stateful applications where persistent storage and complex
configurations are critical.
Security management is another central area in which Terraform can branch out. As per the current research and
the user experience, this calls for more fine-grained Terraform modules that can plug in better control within
configuration securities under continuous monitoring—a must-required feature for compliance and safety from
breaches. The proposed improvements would address the identified limitations and make Terraform an appealing
all-in-one infrastructure management tool. The features will allow Terraform to manage even more configurations
and security requirements and extend its applicability. Such development will help cement Terraform even more
as the tool of choice for automating cloud infrastructure to further digital transformation and maturity.
For companies on the verge of Terraform adoption, the scope of this research is convincing for its various
strengths and limitations. Companies are recommended to balance the self-explanatory wins of Terraform in its
automation and resource management with proportionate consideration for scenarios that require complex
configuration management. The current capabilities of Terraform are closely aligned with cloud resources,
requiring few dependencies, and they hold a bright prospect for systems characterized by immutable or
infrequently changing infrastructures. This necessitates further research into expanding Terraform's repertoire to
some extent sufficient to meet the needs of even dynamic and stateful applications. After all, this extension is
indispensable to the condition that Terraform should remain state-of-the-art in fast-changing cloud services, where
architectural complexity and the urgent request for security exigencies often have no respite.
This would empower Terraform to tackle such complexities with ease and speed and solidify its place in modern
cloud infrastructure management while making the solution appealing to a broader base of businesses looking to
harness the power of cloud automation.
At the core, the development path for Terraform appears to be tilted towards more coverage of different
infrastructure patterns and more security-first in the approach toward configuration management. That will make it
a very flexible and indispensable device within the toolbox for cloud infrastructure, offering businesses the agility,
security, and efficiency they need to succeed in the cloud-centric digital landscape. Therefore, enterprises must
keep their ears to the ground for emerging trends and innovations in cloud infrastructure management and monitor
roadmaps for Terraform development to assess fit within strategic operational frameworks.

CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the research strongly underpins Terraform's mighty role in the automation of infrastructure
management, which is ideally in line with the strategic imperative of the efficiency enhancement of the business
outlined in the leading title of the present study. While Terraform has powerfulresource efficiency and automation
features, it limits itself to complex configuration management and security. This will ensure that Terraform is
saturated with more comprehensive potential to confront this domain. So, it remains one of the essential and
pivotal tools in the modern cloud infrastructure landscape. More Terraform capabilities will go a long way to

87
Lekkala C Euro. J. Adv. Engg. Tech., 2022, 9(11): 82-
88
____________________________________________________________________________
__
ensuring that organizations use the tool more effectively and derive immense value in automating infrastructure
management to drive business efficiency.

REFERENCES
[1]. I. Kumara et al., "The do's and don'ts of infrastructure code: A systematic gray literature
review," Information and Software Technology, vol. 137, p. 106593, Sep. 2021, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106593.
[2]. M. Basher, DevOps: An explorative case study on the challenges and opportunities in implementing
Infrastructure as code. Mar.2019. Available: https://www.diva-
portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1331526
[3]. S. Achar, "Enterprise SaaS Workloads on New-Generation Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) on Multi-Cloud
Platforms," Global Disclosure of Economics and Business, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 55–74, Jul. 2021, doi:
https://doi.org/10.18034/gdeb.v10i2.652.
[4]. S. Naziris, "Infrastructure as code: towards dynamic and programmable IT systems," essay.utwente.nl,
Dec. 06, 2019. https://essay.utwente.nl/80190/.
[5]. M. Basher, DevOps: An explorative case study on the challenges and opportunities in implementing
Infrastructure as code. 2019. Available: https://www.diva-
portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1331526
[6]. M. Wurster et al., "The essential deployment metamodel: a systematic review of deployment automation
technologies," SICS Software-Intensive Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 35, no. 1–2, pp. 63–75, Aug. 2019,
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-019-00412-x.
[7]. A. Draghici and M. V. Steen, "A Survey of Techniques for Automatically Sensing the Behavior of a
Crowd," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–40, Apr. 2018, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3129343.
[8]. S. Cheruvu, A. Kumar, N. Smith, and D. M. Wheeler, "IoT Frameworks and Complexity," Demystifying
Internet of Things Security, pp. 23–148, Aug. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2896-8_2.
[9]. H. Ning, Y. Li, F. Shi, and L. T. Yang, "Heterogeneous edge computing open platforms and tools for
internet of things," Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 106, pp. 67–76, May 2020, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.12.036.
[10]. M. Liyanage, P. Porambage, A. Y. Ding, and A. Kalla, "Driving forces for Multi-Access Edge
Computing (MEC) IoT integration in 5G," ICT Express, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 127–137, Jun. 2021, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2021.05.007.
[11]. M. Hagara, "Evaluation of Infrastructure as a Code for Enterprise Automation," is.muni.cz, May.2018.
https://is.muni.cz/th/liwzz/?verze=2017).
[12]. A. Rahman, E. Farhana, C. Parnin, and L. Williams, "Gang of Eight: A Defect Taxonomy for
Infrastructure as Code Scripts," IEEE Xplore, Oct. 01, 2020.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9284113.
[13]. Lateş, I. (Jan.,2020) "Automating Cyber-Range Virtual Networks Deployment Using Open-Source
Technologies (Chef Software)." Available: http://economyinformatics.ase.ro/content/EN20/03%20-
%20lates.pdf
[14]. Rebecca, “Hello, Terraform,” TECHNICLOUD, Apr. 28, 2020.
https://technicloud.com/2020/04/28/hello-terraform/.
[15]. S. Bansal, "Terraform: Transform your Infrastructure for a Scalable Tomorrow," Medium, Jul. 13, 2020.
https://medium.com/@sanchitbansal26/terraform-transform-your-infrastructure-for-a-scalable-tomorrow-
b2a53d2acfc.
[16]. HashiCorp, “HashiCorp,” HashiCorp. (Dec,.2020)https://www.hashicorp.com/resources/how-we-used-
the-hashistack-to-transform-the-world-of-roblox
[17]. G. Gurbatov, "A comparison between Terraform and Ansible on their impact upon the lifecycle and
security management for modifiable cloud infrastructures in OpenStack,"May.2022. Available:
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1678017/FULLTEXT02.pdf
[18]. L.-H. Lee et al., "All One Needs to Know about Metaverse: A Complete Survey on Technological
Singularity, Virtual Ecosystem, and Research Agenda," arXiv:2110.05352 [cs], vol. 14, no. 8, Nov. 2021,
Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.05352

88
Lekkala C Euro. J. Adv. Engg. Tech., 2022, 9(11): 82-
88
____________________________________________________________________________
__
[19]. A. Alberto and P. Gemelgo, "Supply Chain (micro)TMS development Project presented as a partial
requirement for the degree of Master of Information Management."Oct.2021 Available:
https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/134279/1/TGI0520.pdf
[20]. S. S. Butt, "Autoscaling through Self-Adaptation Approach in Cloud Infrastructure. A Hybrid Elasticity
Management Framework Based Upon MAPE (Monitoring-Analysis-Planning-Execution) Loop, to
Ensure Desired Service Level Objectives (SLOs)," bradscholars.brad.ac.uk, May. 2019. Available:
https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/18718

89