IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P. (Crl) No. _______ of 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: -

Meena Dahiya …Petitioner

Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

INDEX

S.No. PARTICULARS C/FEE PAGE

NO.
1.
Letter of Service

2. Urgent Application

3. List of Dates and Events

4. Memo of Parties

5. Criminal Writ Petition under Article

226/227 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 530 of The

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

2023 for Issuance of writ in the nature

of certiorari or any other writ or

order/s, direction/s for quashing of

FIR bearing no. 61/2023 registered at

police station North Avenue, New

Delhi.
7. ANNEXURE- A: FIR bearing no.

0061/2023 registered at police station

North Avenue, New Delhi along with,

True Typed and Translated Copy.

8. ANNEXURE- B: Copy of the Letter

dated 28.02.2024 issued by

Respondent no. 2 to Director,

ABVIMs and Dr RML Hospital, New

Delhi.

9. ANNEXURE- C: Copy of the Letter

dated 09.03.2024 issued by Inquiry

Officer of Disciplinary Authority to Dr.

Vijay Kumar Vigilance Officer of Dr.

RML Hospital, New Delhi.

10. ANNEXURE – D: Copy of the order

dated 08.03.2024 passed by Dr. Ajay

Shukla, Director & Medical

Superintendent, Ram Manohar Lohia

Hospital, New Delhi.

11. ANNEXURE – E: Copy of the letter

dated 22.06.2024 issued by Vijay

Prakash Nodiya Dy. Director

Administration to SHO, PS North

Avenue.
 13. ANNEXURE – F (Colly): Copy of

Identity proof of petitioner and

respondent no. 2 alongwith

photographs.

13. Application u/s. 530 BNSS for stay of

Proceedings before trial court

alongwith supporting affidavit.

15. Vakalatnama of Petitioner

16. Vakalatnama of Respondent no. 2

17. Court Fees

FILED BY:

(RISHABH THAKUR & ASSOCIATES)

Advocate (D-2842/2017)
CH NO 431 4th Floor
Rohini, Delhi
Mobile No. 8287828816
Email: adv.rishabhthakur@gmail.com
New Delhi
Dated: .07.2024
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P. (Crl) No. _______ OF 2024
IN THE MATTER OF: -
Meena Dahiya …Petitioner
Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

GROUNDS OF URGENCY

Kindly treat the accompanying petition as an urgent one in

accordance with High Court Rules and Orders.

The grounds of urgency are: -

That since the petitioner is law abiding citizen of India and the

petitioner seeks the quashing of the FIR bearing no. 0061/2023

registered at police station North Avenue under section 186/332/353

Indian penal code & Section 4 Medicare service persons and

Medicare service institutions act through this writ petition. Hence the

present petition should be considered urgent in nature.

FILED BY:

(RISHABH THAKUR & ASSOCIATES)

Advocate (D-2842/2017)
CH NO 431 4th Floor
Rohini, Delhi
Mobile No. 8287828816
Email: adv.rishabhthakur@gmail.com

New Delhi
Dated: .07.2024
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P. (Crl) No. _______ of 2024
IN THE MATTER OF: -
Meena Dahiya …Petitioner
Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

LETTER OF SERVICE
To

The Standing Counsel

High Courts Lawyers Chambers
4th Floor, Delhi High Court,
New Delhi

Respected Sir,

Kindly acknowledge the copy of Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of

the Constitution of India R/w Section 530 BNSS. for issuance of writ,
order or direction(s) in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ thereby
quashing the FIR bearing no. 0061/2023 registered at police station
North Avenue under section 186/332/353 Indian penal code & Section
4 Medicare service persons and Medicare service institutions act
against the petitioner. This quashing petition will be coming before the
Hon’ble High Court on ___.07.2024 so you may kindly be present at
the time of hearing of this petition. This is for your kind information and
necessary action.

Thanking you,

FILED BY:
(RISHABH THAKUR & ASSOCIATES)
Advocate (D-2842/2017)
CH NO 431 4th Floor
Rohini, Delhi
Mobile No. 8287828816
Email: adv.rishabhthakur@gmail.com
New Delhi
Dated: .07.2024
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

W.P. (Crl) No. _______ OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: -

Meena Dahiya …Petitioner

Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITON UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 530 OF THE
BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA 2023 FOR
ISSUANCE OF WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTITORARI OR ANY
OTHER WRIT OR ORDER/S, DIRECTION/S FOR QUASHING OF
FIR BEARING NO. 0061/2023 REGISTERED AT POLICE STATION
NORTH AVENUE UNDER SECTION 186/332/353 IPC & SECTION
4 MSPMI ACT REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND
SUBSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS EMANATING THEREFROM ON
THE GROUND OF COMPROMISE.

To,
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE

AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES

OF THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI

AT NEW DELHI.

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIP: -

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: -

1. That the petitioner is filing the present petition for issuance of

writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ or order/s,

direction/s for quashing of FIR bearing no. 0061/2023

registered at police station North Avenue under Section

186/332/353 Indian penal code & Section 4 Medicare service

persons and Medicare service institutions act registered on

04.08.2023 and subsequent proceedings emanating there from

on the ground of compromise.

2. That the petitioner herein is the law-abiding citizen of India and

have full faith in the administration of justice. It is pertinent to

mention here that the petitioner is working as Sr. Nursing

Officer in RML Hospital and respondent no.2 is HOD Psychiatry

in RML Hospital, New Delhi.

4. THAT THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE: -

i) That the petitioner is employed in RML Hospital as Sr. Nursing

officer and respondent no.2 is also employed as HOD in

Psychology Department in RML Hospital, Delhi.

ii) That the daughter of the petitioner Miss Ojaswi is the student of

Psychology of Delhi University and Miss. Ojaswi was directed

by the college for the One Month Internship under respondent

no.2 which was to be started from 01.08.2023.

iii) That on 02.08.2023 the daughter of petitioner was not allowed

to take the classes and she was kicked out of the class on the

pretext of incomplete documents due to this reason petitioner

first time approached to respondent no.2 on the same day

regarding internship of her daughter.

iii) That on 02.08.2023 petitioner got to know from the respondent

no.2 that daughter of petitioner had applied for internship with

letter of recommendation dated 30.06.2023 from her college for

internship from 01.07.2023 to 01.08.2023 and petitioner was

advised to get the letter of recommendation changed for tenure

w.e.f 01.08.2023.
iv) That on making contacts to the college, daughter of petitioner

got to know that college will not provide fresh letter of

recommendation to the student.

v) That on 03.08.2023 petitioner got the approval letter for the

internship from the office of Medical Superintendent, RML

Hospital after getting the documents checked and on

04.08.2023 petitioner again went to meet the respondent no.2

to get the internship classes started but due to temperamental

differences, some altercation occurred between the petitioner

and the respondent no.2 as the fresh letter of recommendation

was demanded by the respondent no.2 for the internship.

iv) That on the compliant of complainant/ respondent no.2 to

Medical Superintendent, ABVIMs and RML Hospital, FIR

bearing no. 0061/2023 registered at police station North

Avenue under section 186/332/353 Indian penal code & Section

4 Medicare service persons and Medicare service institutions

act alleging therein:

a. That the on 04.08.2023 petitioner came to the room of

respondent no.2 with the approval application for the joining.

b. That after perusing through the application, respondent no.2

remarked very gently that the letter of recommendation was not

rectified but she will be allowed to join but petitioner started

screaming and slapped her on her left cheek and left the room

and petitioner further stated that she will assault the respondent

no.2 further and left the premises despite female guard trying

to stop her.
 The true copy of FIR bearing no. 0061/2023 registered at police

station North Avenue under section 186/332/353 Indian penal

code & Section 4 Medicare service persons and Medicare

service institutions act with true typed and translated copy is

annexed herewith as ANNEXURE A.

v) That due to the discussion in the chamber of the Director,

ABVIMs & RML Hospital in presence of Registrar, ABVIMs and

after the apology given in writing by the petitioner to the

respondent no.2 for her misbehavior/indecent behavior,

respondent no.2 decided not to pursue any disciplinary

proceedings against petitioner. Therefore, due to indulgence of

director and registrar, RML Hospital, both the parties have

settled the dispute amicably.

Copy of the Letter dated 28.02.2024 issued by

Respondent no. 2 to Director, ABVIMs and Dr RML Hospital,

New Delhi for not to pursue any case against petitioner is

annexed herewith as ANNEXURE B.

vi). That after considering the mutual understanding of both the

parties, the Disciplinary authority has decided to drop the

disciplinary proceeding against the petitioner.

Copy of the Letter dated 09.03.2024 issued by Inquiry Officer of

Disciplinary Authority to Dr. Vijay Kumar Vigilance Officer of Dr. RML

Hospital, New Delhi to drop the disciplinary proceeding against the

petitioner is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE C.

vii). That on completion of the inquiry conducted by the inquiry

authority viz Sh. Murari Lal Sharma, Registrar, RML Hospital

has submitted that the charges against the petitioner are settled

on basis of mutual understanding by both parties. Therefore,

suspension of petitioner from the service was revoked with

immediate effect and petitioner was warned not to exert

improper behavior and be more careful in future.

Copy of the order dated 08.03.2024 passed by Dr. Ajay Shukla,

Director & Medical Superintendent, Ram Manohar Lohia

Hospital, New Delhi is annexed herewith as ANNEXURE D.

viii). That in view of mutual settlement between both the parties,

Vijay Prakash Nodiya, Dy. Director Administration, RML

Hospital, Delhi gave written notice to the SHO, PS North

Avenue, Delhi and requested that this institute do not want to

pursue this case further and same need to be closed.

Copy of the letter dated 22.06.2024 issued by Vijay Prakash Nodiya

Dy. Director Administration to SHO, PS North Avenue is annexed

herewith as ANNEXURE E.

5. That petitioner is filing the present petition inter-alia on the

following grounds amongst others: -

GROUNDS

A. Because the petitioner and respondent no.2 have compromised

all disputes amicably and Respondent No.2 have no further

claim of either civil or criminal nature against the petitioner.

Copy of id proofs of petitioners and respondent no.2 alongwith

 their photographs are annexed herewith as ANNEXURE F

(COLLY).

B. Because the FIR in question discloses the criminal disputes

between the parties. It is pertinent to mention here that all the

disputes between petitioner and respondent no.2 have been

amicably resolved due to intervention of the Director and

Registrar, ABVIMS & RML Hospital, New Delhi.

C. Because the Hon’ble Supreme court of India as well this

Hon’ble court has time and again held that “it the finest hour in

the judiciary when the parties end their differences themselves

by way of compromise which saves not only the precious time

of the courts but also become a factor whereby harmony

prevails in the society”.

D. Because the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh vs State of

Punjab has held:

“…….But the criminal cases having overwhelmingly and

pre-dominatingly civil flavor stand on different footing for

the purposes of quashing, particularly the offences

arising from commercial, financial, mercantile, civil,

partnership or such like transactions or the offences

arising out of matrimony relating to dowry, etc. or the

family disputes where the wrong is basically private or

personal in nature and the parties have resolved their

entire dispute. In this category of cases, High Court may

quash criminal proceedings if in its view, because of the

compromise between the offender and victim, the

possibility of conviction is remote and bleak and

 continuation of criminal case would put accused to great

oppression and prejudice and extreme injustice would be

caused to him by not quashing the criminal case despite

full and complete settlement and compromise with the

victim. In other words, the High Court must consider

whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of

justice to continue with the criminal proceeding or

continuation of the criminal proceeding would tantamount

to abuse of process of law despite settlement and

compromise between the victim and wrongdoer and

whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate

that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to

the above question(s) is in affirmative, the High Court

shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal

proceeding…”

E. Because it is pertinent to mention here that the Hon’ble Apex

Court in B.S. Joshi and Ors.v. State of Haryana and Anr. in

Appeal (Crl.) 383 of 2003, acts as guide for the High Court to

determine whether to exercise the powers under Section 482,

Cr.P.C. in a given case or not.

“The Court held in that matter that there was no

general proposition limiting power of quashing the

criminal proceedings or FIR or complaint as vested

in Section 482 or extraordinary power under Article

226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, if for the

purpose of securing the ends of justice, quashing

of FIR becomes necessary. Section 320 would not

 be a bar to the exercise of power of quashing. It is,

however, a different matter depending upon the

facts and circumstances of each case whether to

exercise or not such a power.”

F. Because the Hon’ble High Court of Punjab and Haryana at

Chandigarh in Nirmal Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another

allowed the petition and quashed the FIR stating that: -

“compromise in modern society is the sine qua

non of harmony and orderly behavior. As observed

by Hon’ble Justice Krishna Iyer., the finest hour of

justice arrives propitiously when parties despite

falling apart, bury the hatchet and weave a sense

of fellowship of reunion. Inherent powers of the

court under section 482 Cr.P.C is not limited to the

matrimonial cases alone. The court has wide

powers to quash the proceedings even in non-

compoundable offences in order to prevent the

abuse of process of law and to secure ends of

justice, notwithstanding bar under section 320

CrPC. Exercise of power in a given situation will

depend on facts of each case. The duty of the court

is not only to decide a lis between the parties after

a protracted litigation but it is a vital and extra-

ordinary instrument to maintain and control social

order. The resolution of dispute by way of

compromise between two warring groups should

be encouraged unless such compromise is

 abhorrent to lawful composition of society or would

promote savagery”.

G. Because the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in Basara versus State

reported as 2007(97) DRJ 381 while quashing the held in the

para No.14 & 15 of Judgment;

“In the present case since the parties have

amicably compromised the subject of matter of the

FIR in question among themselves, no useful

purpose is likely to be served by continuing with

the aforementioned criminal case registered

against the petitioners. Petitioners and

complainant are residents of the same locality.

Peace has been brought in locality with the

intervention of the well-wishers of the locality.

When there is peace in locality, there will be peace

in the town. When there is peace in the town, there

will be peace in city. When there is peace in city,

there will be peace in State. When there is peace

in State, there will be peace in Country. It is

therefore in the interest of the society that

permission to quash the FIR in question is granted

by this Court. Moreover, since petitioners and

complainant are resident of same locality,

continuation of criminal proceedings will only

revive the bitter memories of the past and may lead

to further enmity between them.”

H. Because the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case titled as

Rishi Raj & ORS. Vs. State reported as 2009 (1) JCC 265, while

quashing the FIR and Proceedings, arising therefrom held in

Para 6 of the judgment that:

“In light of the above referred factual and legal

position, I am of the considered view that it would

be an exercise in futility to proceed with the trial of

this case as the injured as well as the accused

party have compromised and settled the disputes

with each other for all the times to come. They

have also assured to this court that in future they

will maintain good behaviour and would not indulge

in such activities.”

I. Because the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case titled as

Mahender Koli @ Chiddi & ORS. Vs. State in Crl.

MC.3887/2011 and Crl. MA. 18344/2011, while quashing the

FIR No.554/2007 in a case under Section 308/323/427/

452/506/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 which was registered

against the petitioner Nos.1 to 5 on the complaint of petitioner

No.6, Chander Bhan at PS Keshav Puram, held in Para 8 of the

judgment that:

“Keeping in view the fact that all the petitioners

stay in the same locality to maintain peace and

harmony in the society and to put an end to their

enmity, I deem it proper to quash the present FIR.

Ordered accordingly.”
J. Because the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the case titled as

Navrang Pal & ORS. Vs. State in Crl. MC.2328/2004, while

quashing the FIR held that:

“High Court while exercising inherent powers could

quash a criminal proceeding on a complaint in a non-

compoundable case and that Section 320 of the Code

could not limit or affect the powers under Section 482 of

the Code.”

6. That the petitioner craves leave of this Hon’ble Court to urge any

other ground or grounds at the time of hearing of the present

case.

7. That in these circumstances, it is prayed that it would be in the

fitness of things and to secure the ends of justice that FIR bearing

no. 0061/2023 registered at police station North Avenue under

Section 186/332/353 Indian penal code & Section 4 Medicare

service persons and Medicare service institutions act registered

on 04.08.2023 and subsequent proceedings emanating there

from on the ground of compromise, be quashed.

8. That the petitioner has not filed any other or similar petition either

before this Hon’ble Court or before any other court for same or

similar relief.

13. That the annexures annexed with the petition are true copies of

their respective originals.

PRAYER
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may

kindly be pleased to: -

a) Quash the FIR bearing no. 0061/2023 registered at police

station North Avenue under Section 186/332/353 Indian penal

code & Section 4 Medicare service persons and Medicare

service institutions act registered on 04.08.2023 and

subsequent proceedings emanating there from in the interest of

justice;

b) Pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may

deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the

case.

FILED BY:

(RISHABH THAKUR & ASSOCIATES)

Advocate (D-2842/2017)
CH NO 431 4th Floor
Rohini, Delhi
Mobile No. 8287828816
Email: adv.rishabhthakur@gmail.com
New Delhi
Dated: .07.2024
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Crl M.No. OF 2024

In
W.P. (Crl) No. _______ OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: -

Meena Dahiya …Petitioner

Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 530 BNSS FOR STAY OF

INVESTIGATION IN FIR BEARING NO. 0061/2023
REGISTERED AT POLICE STATION NORTH AVENUE
UNDER SECTION 186/332/353 IPC & SECTION 4 MSPMI
ACT REGISTERED ON 04.08.2023 ON BEHALF OF
PETITIONER.

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR LORDSHIP: -

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: -

1. That the petitioner is filing the accompanying petition under

article 226/227 of the Constitution Of India read with Section

530 of The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 for

issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari or any other writ or

order/s, direction/s for quashing of FIR bearing no. 0061/2023

registered at police station North Avenue under section

186/332/353 IPC and Section 4 MPMSI Act against the

petitioner on 04.08.2023 and subsequent proceedings

emanating therefrom on the ground of compromise qua the

petitioner. The contents of the same are not being repeated

herein for the sake of brevity and may be treated as part and

parcel of the present application.

2. That the petitioner and respondent no.2 have settled their

disputes vide letter dated 28.02.2024 issued by respondent

no.2 to Director ABVIMs and Dr RML Hospital to drop the

Disciplinary proceedings against Petitioner and order dated

08.03.2024 passed by Dr. Ajay Shukla, Director & Medical

Superintendent, RML Hospital to exonerate the charges levied

against petitioner on the basis of mutual understanding of

petitioner and respondent no.2.

3. That the petitioner has a very good prima facie case in his favor

and is every likelihood to succeed.

4. That since the disputes between the parties have resolved and

they have settled their disputes amicably. Thus, pursuing the

investigation in FIR bearing no. 0061/2023 registered at police

station North Avenue under section 186/332/353 IPC and

Section 4 MPMSI Act will be futile, therefore in this fact and

circumstances the investigation in the FIR in question be

stayed.

PRAYER

It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may

kindly be pleased to :-

a) Stay the proceedings of trial court in FIR bearing no. 0061/2023

registered at police station Crime North Avenue under section

186/332/353 IPC and Section 4 MPMSI Act till the disposal of

the present petition;

b) Pass any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may

deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the

case.

FILED BY:

(RISHABH THAKUR & ASSOCIATES)

Advocate(D-2842/17)
CH NO 431 4th Floor
Rohini, Delhi
Mobile No. 8287828816
Email: adv.rishabhthakur@gmail.com
New Delhi
Dated: .07.2024
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Crl M.No. OF 2024

In
W.P. (Crl) No. _______ OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: -

Meena Dahiya …Petitioner

Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

MEMO OF PARTIES

Smt. Meena Dahiya

W/o Sh. Satish Kumar
R/o ______________
______________-124412 …Petitioner

Versus

1. State
Through Govt. of NCT of Delhi,
New Delhi

2. Smt. Meena Chandra

D/o ___________
R/o _____________
______________-110039 …..Respondents

FILED BY:

(RISHABH THAKUR & ASSOCIATES)

Advocate(D-2842/17)
CH NO 431 4th Floor
Rohini, Delhi
Mobile No. 8287828816
Email: adv.rishabhthakur@gmail.com
New Delhi
Dated: .07.2024
 LIST OF DATES AND EVENTS

DATE EVENTS
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Crl M.No. OF 2024

In
W.P. (Crl) No. _______ OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: -

Meena Dahiya …Petitioner

Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

AFFIDAVIT

I, Meena Dahiya, aged about _____ years D/o ________, R/o

_______________, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: -

1. That I am the Petitioner in the above noted case and as such am

fully conversant with the facts and circumstances of the case and

competent to depose the present affidavit.

2. That the accompanying writ petition has been drafted under my

instructions which has been read and understood by me and I say

that the averments made therein on the basis of record and to the

best of my knowledge and believed to be correct.

3. That the contents of List of Dates are drafted by my counsel which

are true to best of my knowledge and the records maintained by

me.

4. That the contents of the para _____ and para _____ of the writ

petition are drafted by my counsel and based on legal advice

received, which I believe to be true.

5. That I say that Annexures of the writ petition are true copies of

originals.

6. That the deponent and the respondent no.2 have settled the

disputes as per the letter dated 28.02.2024 issued by respondent

no.2 to the Director, ABVIMs and Dr. RML, Hospital, New Delhi
 for dropping/not to pursue the Disciplinary proceedings against

the petitioner, in view of this the respondent no.2 is not interested

in pursuing the present FIR.

7. That in terms of the Letter dated 28.02.2024 and 09.03.2024, and

Order dated 08.03.2024 deponent and the respondent no.2 has

filed present petition, for quashing of FIR bearing no. 0061/2023

registered at police station North Avenue under section

186/332/353, IPC and Section 4 MPMSI Act dated 04.08.2023.

8. That the respondent no.2 has no objection in case the FIR bearing

no. 0061/2023 registered at Police Station North Avenue under

section 186/332/353, IPC and Section 4 MPMSI Act dated

04.08.2023 was registered against the Petitioner be quashed in

terms of the Letter dated 28.02.2024 and 09.03.2024, and Order

dated 08.03.2024

9. I say that the consent of respondent no.2 for quashing of the FIR

is of her own free will and consent, without any force, pressure,

and coercion from any quarter whatsoever.

10. That I have not filed any similar or other petition in matter.

Deponent
VERIFICATION:-

Verified at New Delhi on this day of ________, 2024, that the

contents of my above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge,

based on the information derived from the records and nothing has

been concealed therefrom.

Deponent
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Crl M.No. OF 2024

In
W.P. (Crl) No. _______ OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: -

Meena Dahiya …Petitioner

Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

AFFIDAVIT

I, Meena Chandra, aged about _____ years D/o ________, R/o

_______________, do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: -

11. That I am the Respondent No.2/complainant in the above noted

case and as such am fully conversant with the facts and

circumstances of the case and competent to depose the present

affidavit.

12. That the accompanying writ petition has been drafted under my

instructions which has been read and understood by me and I say

that the averments made therein on the basis of record and to the

best of my knowledge and believed to be correct.

13. That the contents of List of Dates are drafted by my counsel which

are true to best of my knowledge and the records maintained by

me.

14. That the contents of the para _____ and para _____ of the writ

petition are drafted by my counsel and based on legal advice

received, which I believe to be true.

15. That I say that Annexures of the writ petition are true copies of

originals.
16. That the deponent and the petitioner have settled the disputes as

per the letter dated 28.02.2024 issued by deponent to the Director,

ABVIMs and Dr. RML, Hospital, New Delhi for dropping/not to

pursue the Disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner, in view

of this the deponent is not interested in pursuing the present FIR.

17. That in terms of the Letter dated 28.02.2024 and 09.03.2024, and

Order dated 08.03.2024 petitioner and the deponent has filed

present petition, for quashing of FIR bearing no. 0061/2023

registered at police station North Avenue under section

186/332/353, IPC and Section 4 MPMSI Act dated 04.08.2023.

18. That the deponent has no objection in case the FIR bearing no.

0061/2023 registered at Police Station North Avenue under

section 186/332/353, IPC and Section 4 MPMSI Act dated

04.08.2023 was registered against the Petitioner be quashed in

terms of the Letter dated 28.02.2024 and 09.03.2024, and Order

dated 08.03.2024

19. I say that the consent for quashing of the FIR is of my own free

will and consent, without any force, pressure, and coercion from

any quarter whatsoever.

20. That I have not filed any similar or other petition in matter.

Deponent
VERIFICATION:-

Verified at New Delhi on this day of ________, 2024, that the

contents of my above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge,

based on the information derived from the records and nothing has

been concealed therefrom.

Deponent
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Crl M.No. OF 2024

In
W.P. (Crl) No. _______ OF 2024

IN THE MATTER OF: -

Meena Dahiya …Petitioner

Versus

State & Anr. …Respondents

AFFIDAVIT

I, Meena Dahiya aged about ____ years, w/o Satish Kumar, R/o Qtr

588, INA Metro Station Gate No.3, Laxmi Bai Nagar, Sarojini Nagar,

South West Delhi, presently at Delhi do hereby solemnly affirm and

declare as under:-

1. That I am Petitioner in the above noted case and as such fully

conversant with the facts of the case and competent to depose

the present affidavit.

2. That the accompanying application has been drafted by my

counsel under my instruction and the contents of the same are

true and correct to my knowledge and read over to me in

vernacular and may be treated as part and parcel of this

affidavit and are not being repeated herein for the sake of

brevity.

Deponent
VERIFICATION:-

Verified at New Delhi on this day of , 2024, that the

contents of my above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge,
based on the information derived from the records and nothing has
been concealed therefrom.

Deponent