Investigation and Prediction of Machining Characteristics of Aerospace Material Through WEDM Process Using Machine Learning
Investigation and Prediction of Machining Characteristics of Aerospace Material Through WEDM Process Using Machine Learning
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-024-01923-x
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Abstract
In this study, pure titanium is used as the workpiece material and a machine learning approach is used to forecast the material
removal rate (MRR) during wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM). The novelty of present research work was to
perform machining operation on pure titanium through the WEDM process as the pure titanium is majorly used in aviation
and aircraft industries. The machining industries could get help through this study to run the machining process based on
machine learning approach for increased productivity considering the scope of Industry 4.0. This study’s goal is to create a
precise prediction model that can anticipate MRR based on a variety of input factors, such as pulse-on time, pulse-off time,
wire feed rate, wire tension, servo voltage, and peak current. Experimental data was collected through a series of WEDM
experiments on pure titanium using an L-27 orthogonal array based on Taguchi’s design of experiments. MRR was selected
from the pre-processed data to train and evaluate the machine learning model. The prediction model was developed using
a variety of regression techniques, including Linear Regression using scikit-learn, support vector regression (SVR), random
forest, K-nearest neighbors regression using Python in Jupyter notebook. Coefficient of determination (R-squared) and root
mean squared error were used to assess the model’s performance. The results show that the linear regression using scikit-learn
and SVR algorithm performs better in terms of prediction accuracy than the other algorithms. The surface integrity analysis
was performed to determine the effects of process parameters on machined surface. The proposed study helps to increase
the efficacy and efficiency of WEDM operations by offering a trustworthy tool for MRR predictions. The proposed research
depicts a good agreement between experimental and predicted values.
Keywords Support vector regression · Pure titanium · Material removal rate · Wire electrical discharge machine · Machine
learning
                                                                                                                                   123
                                                                    International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
to the tool, poor heat conductivity, and narrow chip-tool con-     as pulse on time (TON ), pulse off time (TOFF ), peak cur-
tact zones on the tool face [1, 2]. As titanium has a lower        rent (IP), wire feed (WF), wire tension (WT), servo voltage
value of thermal conductivity (16.3 W/m K) versus medium           (SV) were chosen as input variables during WEDM of pure
carbon steel (43 W/m K), WEDM process develops a signifi-          titanium. Process parameters and their levels are shown in
cant amount of thermal energy in the machining zone causing        Table 2. The Taguchi’s experimental design methodology
higher machining efficiency.                                       has several benefits, including efficiency in experimentation,
    WEDM process utilizes a thin metal wire as the electrode       identification of significant variables, robustness to variabil-
in the manufacturing process to carve complicated shapes           ity and systematic problem-solving method approach. Table
and curves in conductive materials. The wire is fed into the       3 shows the L-27 array design with mean values of MRR as
workpiece while being held under stress during the electri-        process characteristics.
cal current passes through it. The material erodes and the             Material Removal Rate (MRR) was calculated by follow-
required shape is cut when the wire comes near to the work-        ing equation.
piece and sparks are produced between them. The spark is
carefully controlled to make the desired shape while the wire                 
is continuously pushed into the machining zone. Most of the        MRR mm3 /min  Cutting speed (mm/min)
wire materials used in WEDM process are copper, brass,                                      × kerf (mm)
aluminium, molybdenum etc. having a diameter range of                                       × thickness of plate (mm)                 (1)
0.05 to 0.3 mm as per requirement. The wire utilized in the
WEDM process must be straight, have a high melting point,
strong electrical conductivity, and good flush ability. Figure 1      Kerf width was calculated by subtracting the dimensions
exhibits the WEDM process. Literature review was summa-            of punch from the cavity produced after machining.
rized in Table 1 which represents the various methodologies           The flow chart shown in Fig. 2 depicts the details of the
used to predict the quality characteristics of WEDM process        experimental and research methodology.
by different researchers.
    It is revealed from literature that many authors have
applied the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method to pre-         3 Implementation of supervised machine
dict the machining data. While machine learning methods              learning (regression model)
are having more benefits in terms of interpretation, train-
ing speed, robustness, and control over feature engineering.       The corelation behaviour is exhibited between dependent and
Machine learning is also comparatively better in terms of          more then one independent variables by regression model.
computational efficiency and model transparency.                   The evaluation of degree of corelation is also shown by it.
    The above review reveals that the various modelling            Regression is found suitable to predict the machining char-
methods were used to predict the machining characteristics         acteristics of manufacturing processes. Artificial intelligence
of WEDM process by various researchers. The novelty of             and Machine Learning algorithms can do this task in a very
proposed research is focused on to predict the machining           efficient manner.
outcome of aviation industry material (pure titanium). As             There are two types of machine learning algorithms:
the modern manufacturing industries are leading toward the         supervised learning and unsupervised learning. In supervised
era of Industry 4.0 which necessitates the need of integration     learning, each data point is labelled with a known outcome,
of unconventional manufacturing with artificial intelligence       and the algorithm is trained on this labelled data. The algo-
and machine learning. The proposed work exhibits the step          rithm learns to anticipate the results for fresh unforeseen data
toward the inculcation of component of Industry 4.0 with           based on the patterns discovered from the labelled data. In
wire cut electric discharge machining process.                     unsupervised learning, the algorithm learns to recognize pat-
                                                                   terns and structure in the data on its own after being taught
                                                                   on unlabelled data. Decision trees, support vector machines,
                                                                   random forests, KNN classification, neural networks, and
2 Experimental procedure                                           deep learning models are just a few examples of the many
                                                                   kinds of machine learning algorithms. Regression techniques
In this study, pure titanium was machined using WEDM               need a collection of input-output pairs, or training data, to be
process. The workpiece dimensions were 144.75 × 108.96             fed throughout the training process afterwards, the algorithm
× 24.25 mm3 . Electronica Machine Tool Limited, India’s            makes use of this information to discover the fundamental
sprintcut (ELPULS-40A DLX) WEDM model was used for                 correlation between the input and output variables.
the study. In these experimental runs, 0.25 mm zinc-coated            The following steps are involved to create machine learn-
brass wire was employed. Six machining parameters such             ing regression models.
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
a. Importing the necessary packages                                      3.1 Linear regression using sckit learn in machine
b. Importing the dataset in Jupyter notebook                                 learning
c. Creating a correlation heat map to visualize correlation
   of input and output parameters of the dataset                         A linear regression model was built using sckit learn library.
d. Creating feature variables (Input and Output)                         The Python code is shown below.
e. Standardization of dataset
f. Splitting data into train and test sets
                                                                         a. Importing the necessary packages
g. Create a regression model
h. Regression diagnostics
                                                                                                                            123
      Table 1 Summary of the literature review of AI/ML models applied on WEDM/EDM process
123
      1        Narayanan and Vasudevan [3]   Artificial Neural Network (ANN)    Wear (W), Thickness (T) of job and   Copper material                  Effectively used for predicting
                                                                                 time (Ti)                                                             copper material processing
                                                                                                                                                       characteristics
      2        Devarasiddappa et al. [4]     M-TLBO algorithm                   Material removal rate (MRR)          Ti6Al4V alloy                    Several iterations of the M-TLBO
                                                                                                                                                       algorithm have shown accurate
                                                                                                                                                       and reliable performance. It also
                                                                                                                                                       required less computing time and
                                                                                                                                                       effort and converged more
                                                                                                                                                       quickly, often in fewer than 10
                                                                                                                                                       iterations for Ti6Al4V alloy
      3        Thankachan et al. [5]         Machine learning techniques and    MRR and Surface Roughness            Novel aluminum alloy and metal   Multiple linear regression and
                                              Neural Network models                                                   matrix composite                 ANN models was developed for
                                                                                                                                                       predicting MRR and Ra values
                                                                                                                                                       based on the significant input
                                                                                                                                                       parameters and the results
                                                                                                                                                       achieved from the models were
                                                                                                                                                       compared with experimental
                                                                                                                                                       values and was found efficient
      4        Rees et al. [6]               Inductive learning                 Surface Roughness                    94% tungsten carbide and 6%      Investigations were made into the
                                                                                                                      cobalt                            hybrid micro machining
                                                                                                                                                        technique known as WEDM for
                                                                                                                                                        conducting WEDG with a
                                                                                                                                                        submersible rotary head. A
                                                                                                                                                        prediction model for surface
                                                                                                                                                        finish using WEDG was created
                                                                                                                                                        by using inductive learning and
                                                                                                                                                        data collected through online
                                                                                                                                                        process monitoring
      5        Shukla & Priyadarshini [7]    Machine learning algorithm         Surface roughness and kerf width     HASTEALLOY C276 using            The best values of response
                                              namely, gradient descent method                                         WEDM taken from the              variables were effectively
                                              as an optimization technique                                            literature                       predicted using the gradient
                                                                                                                                                       descent approach
                                                                                                                                                                                           International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
      Table 1 (continued)
      6        Nain et al. [8]           Random forest, M5P tree         MRR, SR, and DD                  Udimet-L605        In contrast to the M5P pruned tree
                                          approaches                                                                           model and the unpruned tree
                                                                                                                               model for MRR and SR of
                                                                                                                               WEDM, the RF model has
                                                                                                                               disclosed the necessary result.
                                                                                                                               For the dimensional deviation of
                                                                                                                               the WEDM of UdimetL605, the
                                                                                                                               M5P unpruned tree model
                                                                                                                               exhibits the significant findings
                                                                                                                               in contrast to the RF and M5P
                                                                                                                               unpruned tree model
      7        Nain et al. [9]           Support vector machine (SVM)    Cutting speed, wire wear ratio   Udimet-L605        When comparing the CS, WWR,
                                          algorithm                       (WWR), and dimensional                              and DD of WEDM of
                                                                          deviation (DD)                                      Udimet-L605, Support Vector
                                                                                                                              Regression based on the RBF
                                                                                                                              model is better than the other two
                                                                                                                              models for predictions
      8        Subrahmanyam and Sarcar   Data mining approach            MRR                              H13 steel          By raising the amount of
                                                                                                                                                                   International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
123
      Table 1 (continued)
123
      10       Reddy et al. [12]        TLBO (Teaching–Learning Based       Energy consumption, kerf width,   Al-Si metal matrix composite     For the optimization of difficult
                                         Optimization) technique             metal removal rate and surface                                     issues, TLBO is recommended.
                                                                             roughness                                                          In the current work, it is intended
                                                                                                                                                to maximize metal removal rate
                                                                                                                                                during WEDM of Al-Si metal
                                                                                                                                                matrix composite while setting
                                                                                                                                                energy consumption, kerf width,
                                                                                                                                                and surface quality at minimum
                                                                                                                                                levels
      11       Shadab et al. [13]       Metaheuristic Techniques            Material removal rate, cutting    Al5083/7%B4C Composite           RSM was utilized in the TLBO
                                                                             speed, and surface roughness                                       method that is to statistically
                                                                                                                                                predict MRR, CS, and surface
                                                                                                                                                roughness
      12       Singh Nain et al. [14]   SVM, GP and ANN methods             Surface roughness                 Nimonic-90                       The study’s best model, according
                                                                                                                                                to findings, was the GP PUK
                                                                                                                                                Kernel model
      13       Paturi et al. [15]       Artificial neural network (ANN),    Surface roughness                 Inconel 718                      When compared to a statistical
                                         support vector machine (SVM),                                                                          RSM model, machine learning
                                         and genetic algorithm (GA)                                                                             approaches (SVM and ANN)
                                                                                                                                                were shown to have
                                                                                                                                                exceptionally accurate prediction
                                                                                                                                                capabilities
      14       Ulas et al. [16]         ELM, W-ELM, SVR and Q-SVR           Surface roughness                 Al7075                           The W-ELM model, with a value
                                                                                                                                                of 0.9720 R2 , had the best
                                                                                                                                                performance
      15       Jatti et al. [17]        Random Forest, Decision Tree,       MRR                               Cryo-treated workpiece viz,      The approach using gradient
                                         Gradient Boosting and Artificial                                      NickelTitanium (NiTi) alloys,    boosting regression produced the
                                         Neural Network developed by                                           Nickel Copper (NiCu) alloys,     best coefficient of determination
                                         Python programming                                                    and Beryllium copper (BCu)       value, whereas the technique
                                                                                                               alloys                           using Random Forest
                                                                                                                                                classification produced the
                                                                                                                                                highest F1-Score
                                                                                                                                                                                      International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
      Table 1 (continued)
      16       D Srinivasan et al. [18]   Regression models based on             Material Removal Rate (MRR) and    SS304                     The multilayer perception model
                                           machine learning                       surface roughness                                            was shown to have the greatest
                                                                                                                                               correlation coefficient (0.999) for
                                                                                                                                               MRR and surface roughness,
                                                                                                                                               respectively
      17       Chou and Hwang [19]        ANN                                    Wire rupture                       Data from past research   For WEDM, wire rupture may be
                                                                                                                                               predicted using ML algorithms.
                                                                                                                                               Although the basic artificial
                                                                                                                                               neural network, which may not
                                                                                                                                               be the finest one, was utilized in
                                                                                                                                               this study, it nevertheless
                                                                                                                                               performed well enough to
                                                                                                                                               highlight the application’s
                                                                                                                                               potential for machine learning
      18       Saha et al. [20]           Linear regression, regression trees,   Data driven analysis               Data driven analysis      The WEDM process’s performance
                                           support vector machines, and                                                                        metrics are mainly sensitive to
                                           Gaussian process regression)                                                                        the parameters pulse on time
                                                                                                                                               (Ton) and peak current (IP)
                                                                                                                                                                                     International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
      19       Jiang and Yen [21]         MTF-CLSTM                              Surface roughness                  SKD61 Steel               In terms of predicting mean
                                                                                                                                                absolute percentage error,
                                                                                                                                                MTF-CLSTM performs
                                                                                                                                                noticeably better than the
                                                                                                                                                currently used approach
      20       Walia et al. [22]          Decision tree, random forest,          Out-of-roundness of the tool tip   EN31 tool steel           The random forest methodology
                                           generalized linear model, and                                                                       emerged as the most successful
                                           neural network                                                                                      in predicting the outcome among
                                                                                                                                               the machine learning methods
                                                                                                                                               used
123
                                                                     International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
b. Importing the dataset in Jupyter: The data set was                  It is shown from Fig. 3 that TON and SV are more influen-
   imported using pandas.                                           tial process parameters for MRR rather than IP and TOFF . WF
                                                                    and WT are the least influential process parameter depicted
                                                                    from the Fig. 3.
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
f. Splitting data into train and test sets                                as the foundation for this supervised learning approach. In
   The X and Y datasets were split into training and test-                SVR, hyperplane is created allowing a specific degree of
   ing sets consisting of 33% data in to testing and Linear               error or margin which best matches the training data in the
   Regression method was used from sklearn.linear_model.                  best way. In SVR, the hyperplane is defined as the collec-
   Training data was fittted in to regression model.                      tion of points where constant value is equal to dot product
                                                                          of a weight vector and an input vector plus a bias term
g. Create a linear regression model                                       (Fig. 5). There are two hyperparameters named C which con-
                                                                          trols the error term and e controlling the width of margin
   The following equation was formed using the above tech-                (Fig. 5). SVR has the benefit of utilizing a kernel function to
nique.                                                                    address non-linear interactions between the input and output
                                                                          variables. The hyperplane may be linearly separable in the
MRR  −0.333 + 0.887 × TON − 0.535 × TOFF + 0.372 × IP                    higher-dimensional feature space where the kernel function
        − 0.0188 × WF − 0.066 × WT − 0.736 × V                      (2)   translates the input space from. The kernels which are used
                                                                          generally are Linear, Non-Linear, Polynomial, Radial Basis
                                                                          Function (RBF) and Sigmoid.
                                                                             SVR Regression analysis was done using python. The
                                                                          above steps of python code defined in Sect. 3.1 (a) to (f) were
                                                                          implemented and Kernel linear model was used for training
                                                                          the data.
                                                                                                                              123
                                                       International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
3.3 Random forest regression                                                In a random forest regression model, several decision trees
                                                                         are trained on different subsets of the training data (Fig. 6).
Machine learning methods for regression challenges include               For building each decision tree, a random subset of the char-
random forest regression. It is a member of the ensemble                 acteristics that are accessible are selected, and the data is
technique family, which combines many models to increase                 then split based on the best feasible split for the selected cri-
forecast stability and accuracy.                                         terion (e.g., minimising mean square error). In the prediction
                                                                                                                               123
                                                                       International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
phase, the model generates a final forecast by averaging the       3.4 K-nearest neighbors (KNN regression)
predictions from each decision tree.
   One advantage of random forest regression is that it can        K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN) machine learning approach
handle missing data and both continuous and categorical            uses the K closest data points in the feature space to predict
variables. It is also less prone to overfitting than individual    a continuous target variable in regression applications. The
decision trees since the combination of several trees lessens      value of K (i.e., the number of nearest neighbours to consider)
the impact of noise and outliers in the data. Moreover, fea-       is specified. K closest data points in the feature space are
ture significance scores that may be used to identify the key      determined for each new data point based on their Euclidean
components of the model may be produced using random               distance from the new point. The forecast value for the new
forests.                                                           data point is the average of the target values of the K closest
   The Random Forest Regressor function of the sklearn             data points (Fig. 7).
package was used for training the random forest regression
model.
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
Fig. 4 Scatter pairplot matrix for WEDM process parameters and MRR
                                                                         123
                                                               International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
4.1 Regression diagnostic for linear regression               for training and testing data was found 0.23 and 0.57 respec-
    model                                                     tively as shown in Fig. 8a, b.
The R2 score for training and testing data was found 0.917
and 0.775 respectively, while root mean square error (RMSE)
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
Fig. 8 a Correlation between experimental results and linear regression using sckit learn model predictions for training data set. b Correlation
between experimental results and linear regression using sckit learn model predictions for testing dataset
4.2 Regression diagnostic for support vector                              4.3 Regression diagnostic for support Random
    regression model                                                          Forest Regression model
The R2 score training and testing data was found 0.951 and                The R2 score training and testing data was found 0.931 and
0.753 respectively, while root mean square error for training             0.296 respectively, while root mean square error for training
and testing data was found to be 0.21 and 0.84 respectively               and testing data was found to be 0.22 and 0.99 respectively
as shown in Fig. 9a, b.                                                   (Fig. 10a, b).
                                                                                                                                    123
                                                                          International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
Fig. 9 a Correlation between experimental results and support vector regression model prediction for training data set. b Correlation between
experimental results and support vector regression model predictions for testing dataset
4.4 Regression diagnostic for support KNN                               4.5 Comparative analysis of ML models
    Regression model
                                                                        The comparative analysis of correlation between experimen-
The R2 score training and testing data was found 0.78 and               tal value of MRR and machine learning model adopted in the
0.12 respectively, while root mean square error for training            study are shown in bar chart (Figs. 12 and 13) in terms of R2
and testing data was found to be 2.07 and 7.95 respectively             score and RMSE values. It can be inferred from comparison
Fig. 11a, b.                                                            that support vector regression and linear regression model
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
Fig. 10 a Correlation between experimental results and random forest regression model prediction for training data set. b Correlation between
experimental results and random forest regression model predictions for testing dataset
must be preferred as compared to other models such as Ran-               made it possible to understand how the WEDM procedures
dom Forest and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithm models due                   affected structural modifications. Figure 14 displays the sam-
to higher accuracy found in current research study (Figs. 12             ple’s SEM picture. A thicker coating of debris, deep craters,
and 13)                                                                  larger-sized spherical droplets (SPD), and a substantial num-
                                                                         ber of fissures are all shown in Fig. 14’s surface texture.
                                                                         Cracks are sometimes referred to as microcracks because
5 Microstructure analysis                                                they are the result of internal stresses that occurred because
                                                                         of a rapid local heating cycle. However, the length and den-
Machined surface after WEDM process was examined to                      sity of fractures are influenced by the discharge energy as
investigate the surface integrity with the help of scanning              well as the material’s thermal characteristics. Peak current,
electron microscope (Make Zeiss EV040). This analysis                    pulse on and off times, and spark gap voltage all affect the
                                                                                                                                 123
                                                                            International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
Fig. 11 a Correlation between experimental results and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) regression model prediction for training data set. b Correlation
between experimental results and random K-nearest neighbors (KNN) Regression model predictions for testing dataset
discharge energy. The development of high thermal stresses                 formation of spherical droplets on the machined surface may
that are greater than the material’s ability to withstand frac-            be the result of the molten work material solidifying during
ture in combination with plastic deformation is indicated by               the machining process. The reduction of surface energy dur-
the presence of microcracks [23]. Higher thermal stresses                  ing solidification is related to the spherical form of droplets
may have evolved at the machined surface because of the                    [24].
strong heat discharge (longer pulse length and peak current)
followed by quick cooling (due to short pulse off time). The
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
                                                                                                                           123
                                                                            International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
Fig. 14 Microstructure of the surface of pure Titanium machined after WEDM process (CRT crater, CR crack, DB debris, SPD spherical deposit)
(TON  0.9 µs, TOFF  9.5 µs, IP  200A, SV  50 V, WT  1200 g, WF  10 m/min) a ×3000, b ×5000
Data availability The data that support the findings of this study are           Forum, 969. MSF, (2019). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.
available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.                 net/MSF.969.800
                                                                            8.   Nain, S.S., Garg, D., Kumar, S.: Performance evaluation of the
                                                                                 WEDM process of aeronautics super alloy. Mater. Manuf. Process.
                                                                                 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2018.1476761
                                                                            9.   Nain, S.S., Garg, D., Kumar, S.: Evaluation and analysis of cutting
References                                                                       speed, wire wear ratio, and dimensional deviation of wire electric
                                                                                 discharge machining of super alloy Udimet-L605 using support
 1. Ezugwu, E.O., Wang, Z.M.: Titanium alloys and their machinabil-              vector machine and grey relational analysis. Adv. Manuf. (2018).
    ity—a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 68(3), 262–274 (1997)              https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0192-7
 2. Ezugwu, E.O., Booney, J., Yamane, Y.: An overview of machin-           10.   Subrahmanyam, S.V., Sarcar, M.M.M.: Application of machine
    ability of aeroengine alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 134(2),            learning techniques in the process modeling of WEDM. Int. J. Sci.
    233–253 (2003)                                                               Res. Publ. 3(12), 1–7 (2013)
 3. Narayanan, G.S., Vasudevan, D.: A mathematical model for wire          11.   Pujara, J.M., Kothari, K.D., Gohil, A.V.: Process parameter opti-
    cut electrical discharge machine parameters using artificial neural          mization for MRR and surface roughness during machining LM6
    network. Adv. Mater. Res. 984–985, 9–14 (2014). https://doi.org/             Aluminum MMC on WEDM. Adv. Eng. Forum (2017). https://doi.
    10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.984-985.9                                     org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/aef.20.42
 4. Devarasiddappa, D., Chandrasekaran, M., Ravikumar, M., Thirug-         12.   Reddy, M.C., Venkata Rao, K., Suresh, G.: An experimental investi-
    nanasambandam, M.: Modified teaching learning based optimiza-                gation and optimization of energy consumption and surface defects
    tion for maximization of MRR in wire-cut EDM of Ti6Al4V alloy                in wire cut electric discharge machining. J. Alloys Compd. (2021).
    for sustainable production. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol.             https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158582
    2128 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5117969                         13.   Shadab, M., Singh, R., Rai, R.N.: Multi-objective optimization
 5. Thankachan, T., Soorya Prakash, K., Malini, R., Ramu, S., Sun-               of wire electrical discharge machining process parameters for
    dararaj, P., Rajandran, S., Rammasamy, D., Jothi, S.: Prediction             Al5083/7% B 4C composite using metaheuristic techniques. Arab.
    of surface roughness and material removal rate in wire electri-              J. Sci. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-018-3491-9
    cal discharge machining on aluminum based alloys/composites            14.   Singh Nain, S., Sai, R., Sihag, P., Vambol, S., Vambol, V.: Use of
    using Taguchi coupled Grey Relational Analysis and Artificial                machine learning algorithm for the better prediction of SR pecu-
    Neural Networks. Appl. Surf. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/           liarities of WEDM of Nimonic-90 superalloy. Arch. Mater. Sci.
    j.apsusc.2018.06.117                                                         Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.1422
 6. Rees, A., Brousseau, E., Dimov, S.S., Bigot, S., Griffiths, C.A.:      15.   Paturi, U.M.R., Cheruku, S., Pasunuri, V.P.K., Salike, S., Reddy,
    Development of surface roughness optimization and prediction for             N.S., Cheruku, S.: Machine learning and statistical approach in
    the process of wire electro-discharge grinding. Int. J. Adv. Manuf.          modeling and optimization of surface roughness in wire electrical
    Technol. 64(9–12), 1395–1410 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s0              discharge machining. Mach. Learn. Appl. 6, 100099 (2021). https://
    0170-012-4110-7                                                              doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100099
 7. Shukla, S.K., Priyadarshini, A.: Application of machine learning       16.   Ulas, M., Aydur, O., Gurgenc, T., Ozel, C.: Surface roughness pre-
    techniques for multi objective optimization of response variables in         diction of machined aluminum alloy with wire electrical discharge
    wire cut electro discharge machining operation. Materials Science            machining by different machine learning algorithms. J. Mater. Res.
123
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)
      Technol. 9(6), 12512–12524 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.       23. Lee, S.H., Li, X.: Study of the surface integrity of the machined
      2020.08.098                                                                  workpiece in the EDM of tungsten carbide. J. Mater. Process. Tech-
17.   Jatti, V.S., Dhabale, R.B., Mishra, A., Khedkar, N.K., Jatti, V.S.,          nol. 139, 315–321 (2003)
      Jatti, A.V.: Machine learning based predictive modeling of elec-         24. Huang, C.A., Hsu, F.Y., Yao, S.J.: Microstructure analysis of the
      trical discharge machining of cryo-treated NiTi, NiCu and BeCu               martensitic stainless steel surface fine cut by the wire electrical
      alloys. Appl. Syst. Innov. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/asi506            discharge machining (WEDM). Mater. Sci. Eng. A 371, 119–126
      0107                                                                         (2004)
18.   Srinivasan, D., Ganesh, N., Ramakrishnan, H., Balasundaram, R.,
      Sanjeevi, R., Chandran, M.: Surface topography: metrology and
      properties investigation of surface roughness and material removal
                                                                               Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to juris-
      rate of WEDM of SS304 using ANOVA and regression models.
                                                                               dictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
      Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop. 10, 025014 (2022). https://doi.org/10.
      1088/2051-672X/ac6c9e
                                                                               Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds
19.   Chou, P.H., Hwang, Y.-R.: The study of machine learning for wire
                                                                               exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the
      rupture prediction in WEDM. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2021).
                                                                               author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted
      https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-755393/v1
                                                                               manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such
20.   Saha, S., Gupta, K.M., Dey, S.: Data-driven probabilistic perfor-
                                                                               publishing agreement and applicable law.
      mance of Wire EDM: a machine learning based approach. Proc.
      Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B J. Eng. Manuf. (2021). https://doi.org/10.
      1177/09544054211056417
21.   Jiang, J.R., Yen, C.T.: Product quality prediction for wire electrical
      discharge machining with Markov transition fields and convolu-
      tional long short-term memory neural networks. Appl. Sci. (2021).
      https://doi.org/10.3390/app11135922
22.   Walia, A.S., Srivastava, V., Rana, P.S., Somani, N., Gupta, N.K.,
      Singh, G., Pimenov, D.Y., Mikolajczyk, T., Khanna, N.: Predic-
      tion of tool shape in electrical discharge machining of EN31 steel
      using machine learning techniques. Metals (2021). https://doi.org/
      10.3390/met11111668
123