Group Rating Form
Group REPORTING: Group 10
Group Evaluator: Group 10
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. THE COMMITTEE REPORTING ON THE SAFETY INSPECTION REPORT WILL BE GRADED AS A GROUP.
2. THE FOUR REMAINING COMMITTEE WILL RATE THE COMMITTEE BASED ON THE CRITERIA BELOW.
THE RATING WILL BE: 5 – HIGHEST ; 1 – LOWEST
3. THE SUM OF ALL THE RATING WILL BE THE TOTAL POINTS FOR FINAL EXAM (120 PTS).
Name of Evaluator: Almazan. Angelo Louis S. Members Name and Rating
CRITERIA Almazan. Angelo San Pedro, Billones, Sebastian
Louis S. Amorfina Luise
Speech was clear with appropriate volume and 5 5 5
inflection
Safety Inspection Results was reported in a 5 5 5
convincing and consistent manner
Arguments and viewpoints expressed fit the report 5 5 5
Visual aids are effectively used 5 5 5
Reporters were well prepared and organized 5 5 5
Captured and maintained audience interest 5 5 5
Total 30 30 30
Name of Evaluator: San Pedro, Amorfina Members Name and Rating
CRITERIA Almazan. Angelo San Pedro, Billones, Sebastian
Louis S. Amorfina Luise
Speech was clear with appropriate volume and 5 5 5
inflection
Safety Inspection Results was reported in a convincing 5 5 5
and consistent manner
Arguments and viewpoints expressed fit the report 5 5 5
Visual aids are effectively used 5 5 5
Reporters were well prepared and organized 5 5 5
Captured and maintained audience interest 5 5 5
Total 30 30 30
Name of Evaluator: Billiones, Sebastian Luise Members Name and Rating
CRITERIA Almazan. Angelo San Pedro, Billones, Sebastian
Louis S. Amorfina Luise
Speech was clear with appropriate volume and 5 5 5
inflection
Safety Inspection Results was reported in a convincing 5 5 5
and consistent manner
Arguments and viewpoints expressed fit the report 5 5 5
Visual aids are effectively used 5 5 5
Reporters were well prepared and organized 5 5 5
Captured and maintained audience interest 5 5 5
Total 30 30 30
Name of Evaluator: Group 10 Average Rating
Reporter
Almazan. Angelo Louis S. 30
San Pedro, Amorfina 30
Billones, Sebastian Luise 30