ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 1 of 5
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ .ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ :ﺟﻴﻞ ﻻﻣﺒﺮﺕ ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ :ﻣﻬﺮﻱ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ .ﻧﺎﺷﺮ :ﻣﺮﮐﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﮎ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ
ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ .ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ .١٣٨٠ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ :ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻲ ..ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ :ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺋﻲ .ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﭼﺎﭖ :ﺍﻭﻝ )(١٣٨٠
ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ٥٥٠٠ :ﺭﻳﺎﻝ .ﺷﺎﺑﻚ٩٦٤-٧٥١٩-٠١-× :
. ٦ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻣﻨـﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻜـﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ،ﻋـﻼﻭﻩ ﺑـﺮ ﺍﺭﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﺤـﺘﻮﺍ ،ﻣﺴـﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﻛﻴﻔﻴﺖ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﻧـﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﮔـﺮ ﭼـﻪ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓـﺰﺍﺭ ﺧـﻮﺏ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫـﺎﻱ ﺧـﻮﺏ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺎﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺁﺳﻴﺐ ﺩﻳﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺻﺮﻑ ﻛﻤﻲ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪ ،ﺳﻮﺩﻣﻨﺪ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ.
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ
ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ،ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻳﻌﻨﻲ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻭ ﺳﺨﺖﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﻮﻧﺪ
ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﻛﺎﻭﺷـﮕﺮ ﻭ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﭘﺎﻳﮕـﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻋﻤﻠـﻲ ،ﺍﻳـﻦ ﭘـﻴﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻌـﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ:
ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ،ﻣﻮﺷﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻭﺳﺎﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭﻫﺎ ،ﺭﻭﺵ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺮ ،ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﺎﻋﺪﺕ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﺳـﺮﻳﻊ ﻭ ﺁﺳـﺎﻥ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ،ﺑﻄـﻮﺭ ﻣﺆﺛـﺮ ﺑـﺎ ﻫـﻢ ﺗـﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔـﺮ ﻛـﺎﻭﺵ ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻛﻨﺪ ﺟﻮﺍﺏ ﺑﺪﻫﺪ ﻳﺎ
ﻏﻴﺮﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﻋﺘﻤـﺎﺩ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻓﻘـﻂ ﺳﻤﺞﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﻣﺸﺘﺎﻕﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺯﺣﻤﺖ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻭّﻡ ﻳﺎ ﺳﻮﻡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺁﻥﻫـﺎ ﻛـﻪ ﭘﺸﺘﻜﺎﺭ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﻪﺧﺮﺝﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻭﻗﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﺄﺻﻞ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻧﻜﺎﺕ
ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ:
• ﭼﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻛﺎﺭﭘﺎﻳﻪ) (platformﻫﺎﻱ ﻓﻨﺎﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ـ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻭ ﺳﺨﺖﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ـ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒـﺎﻁ ﺑـﺎ ﺩﻳﺴـﻚ ﻧـﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ" :ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻭﺯ"" ،ﺍﻡﺍﺱـ ﺩﺍﺱ" ﻭ "ﻣﻜﻴﻨﺘﺎﺵ"؛ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ
ﻛﺎﺭﭘﺎﻳﻪﻫـﺎﻱ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮﻱ ﻧﻈـﻴﺮ "ﻳﻮﻧﻴﻜﺲ " ) ( UNIXﻧـﻴﺰ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺠـ ﹰﺎ ﺑﻄـﻮﺭ ﮔﺴـﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﻣﻴـﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﮔﺮﺍﻓﻴﻜﻲ)
((Graphical User Interface (GUIﻧﻈﻴﺮ "ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻭﺯ" ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ "ﺳﻮﺍﺩ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ" ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﺴﺮﻋﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺍﻧﺪ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪﻱ ﻗﺒﻠﻲ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻋﺎﺩﺕﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺷﻮﺍﺭﻩ ،ﺑﺎﺯ ﻭ
ﺑﺴـﺘﻪ ﻛـﺮﺩﻥ ﭘﻨﺠﺮﻩﻫـﺎ ،ﻭ ﺑـﺎﺯﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖﻫـﺎ )=ﻣﻨﻮﻫﺎ( ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﻟﻴﺪﺍﺕ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ
"ﺩﺍﺱ" ﺗـﺎ ﭼـﻪ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﻧﻜﺘﻪﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺤﺚ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ ـ "ﺳﻴﻠﻮﺭﭘﻼﺗﺮ") ، (Silver Platterﺑﺰﺭﮒﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ
ﺩﻳﺴـﻚ ﻧـﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻛـﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮ ﻫـﻴﭻ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺒﻨﺎﻱ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ "ﺍﻡﺍﺱـﺩﺍﺱ" ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻧﻤﻲﺩﻫﺪ ،ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﺗﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ "ﻛﻬﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ" ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ.
• ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﭘﺴﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﮔـﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺧﻮﺩﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ
ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﻴـﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ" .ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﭘﺴﻨﺪﻱ") (Userfriendlinessﻣﻤﻜـﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻨﺠﺶ ،ﻳﻚ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﻧﺎﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ،
ﭼـﻮﻥ ﺗـﺎ ﺣـﺪﻱ ﺑﺴﺘﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﻣﺸﺨﺼﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-6.htm 29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 2 of 5
ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺎﻫﻪﻱ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ،ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺍﻭ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﻧﻌﻄﺎﻑﺗﺮ ﻃﺮّﺍﺣﻲ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﺪﻳﺎﻥ ﻭ
ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎﻥ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﻲ ﺑﺮ "ﺩﺍﺱ" ﻧﻈﻴﺮ "ﺩﻳﺎﻟﻮﮒ ﺁﻧﺪﻳﺴﻚ")Knight – Ridder’s
(DIALOG On Discﺩﻭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﻳﻚ "ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﻲ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ" ،ﻭ ﻳﻚ "ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻱ ﻓﺮﻣﺎﻥ" ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻼ "ﻓﺎﻳﻨﻨﺸﺎﻝ ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ" ﺑﻪ ﺩﻭ
ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ .ﺭﺍﻩ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺗـﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻗـﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖ ﺍﻧﻌﻄـﺎﻑ ،ﻃﺮّﺍﺣﻲ ﺩﻭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻣﺠﺰﺍ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﺻـﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ" :ﻛـﺎﻭﺵ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ" ﻛـﻪ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﻴـﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﺳـﺎﺩﺓ ﺗﺤﺖ "ﺩﺍﺱ" ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ "ﺁﺯﺍﺩﺭﺍﻩ" ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺘﻪﺗﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ
"ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻭﺯ" .ﺛﺎﻧﻴـﺎﹰ ،ﻣﻴـﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﺑـﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﻜـﺎﻥ "ﺭﺍﻫﻴﺎﺑﻲ" ﻳـﺎ ﺣﺮﻛﺖ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﻱ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ
ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻱ ﺑﻌﺪﻱ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ.
ﺑـﺪﻭﻥ ﻓـﻨﻮﻥ ﺧـﻮﺏ ﺭﺍﻫﻴـﺎﺑﻲ ،ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﺧﻴﻠـﻲ ﺯﻭﺩ ﺍﺣﺴﺎﺱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﻮﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ "ﻭﻳﻨﺪﻭﺯ" ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ـ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ
ﻣﻴـﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﺗﺤـﺖ "ﺩﺍﺱ" ـ ﻛﻨـﺘﺮﻝ ﻛﻢﺗـﺮﻱ ﺑـﺮ ﺗﻮﺍﻟـﻲ ﺍﻋﻤـﺎﻝ ﻭﺟـﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺛﺎﻟﺜـﺎﹰ ،ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
ﻼ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻮﺍﺭ
ﻧﻤﻲﺩﺍﻧـﻨﺪ ﭼﻜـﺎﺭ ﺑـﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻜﻨـﻨﺪ ﺑـﻪ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻫﺎ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ـ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻣﻲ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﮕﺮ .ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻣﺴﺘﻄﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﮔﻮﻳﺪ "ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﺪﻥ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﻛﻠﻴﺪ ﺑﺰﻧﻴﺪ" ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ.
ﻧﻜﺘﻪﻱ ﺁﺧﺮ ـ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺨﻮﺩﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ـ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺎﺩﺍﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ
ﻳﻚ ﭘﻴﻐﺎﻡ ﻳﺎ ﻋﻼﻣﺖ ،ﺑﺎﺧﺒﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻓﻜﺮ ﻧﻜﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
• ﺁﻳﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؟
ﻧﻤـﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﺑـﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻـﻔﺤﻪ ،ﺗـﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻣﻬﻤـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺳـﻬﻮﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ،ﺷﻠﻮﻏﻲ ﻭ
ﺑﻪﻫﻢﺭﻳﺨﺘﮕﻲ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺶﺍﺯﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩ ﻳﺎ ﻃﺮﺍﺣﻲ ﺿﻌﻴﻒ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺳﺮﺩﺭﮔﻢ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
ﺍﻫﻤﻴـﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ـ ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﺎﺕ ﺧﺎﺹ ﻓﻨﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ "ﺑﺎ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﻴﻢ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ" ﺭﺍ ﻣﺘﻮﺟﻪ ﻧﺸﻮﻧﺪ .ﺭﻧﮓ ﻧﻴﺰ
ﻧﻘـﺶ ﻣﻬﻤـﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻤـﺎﻳﺶ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻـﻔﺤﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ـ ﻧﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺸﺨﺺﺗﺮﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺐ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ
ﻼ ﻛﻨﺶﻫﺎ ﺍﻏﻠﺐ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻧﮓ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﺭﻧﮓﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﺭﺍﻡﺗﺮ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺳﻔﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺁﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻭﻳﮋﻩﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ .ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻛـﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﻧﺪ .ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻗﻀﺎﻭﺕ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻧﮓ ،ﻳﻚ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺫﻫﻨﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ـ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﺎﺭﺍﺣﺖﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ
ﻼ ﻗـﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﺭﻫﻨﻤﻮﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺎﻃﺮ ﺳﭙﺮﺩ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ
ﺍﺳـﺖ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮﺍﻥ ﻛـﺎﻣ ﹰ
ﻧﻤـﺎﻳﺶ ﻋﻤﻮﻣـ ﹰﺎ ﻧﺒـﺎﻳﺪ ﺑـﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻬـﺎﺭ ﺭﻧـﮓ ﺑﻪﻛـﺎﺭﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻧﮓ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻄﻮﺭ ﻣﻨﺴﺠﻢ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ
ﻼ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻧﺸﺎﻥﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻌﺪﹰﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺸﺨﺺﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ. ﺑﻪﻛﺎﺭﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻣﺜ ﹰ
• ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﺳﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﺮﺩ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪﻱ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ
ﺍﺯ ﻛـﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻣﺎﻧﺪ ،ﻭ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺳﺮﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻭ ﺳﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﮔﻲ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ
ﺑـﺎﻋﺚ ﺧﻮﺍﻫـﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺁﺯﻣـﻮﻥ ،ﻋﺒـﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺸﺎﻫﺪﻩﻱ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻟﻲ ﻣﺜﻞ education
ﻼ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟ ﺍﺗﻔﺎﻕ ﻣﻲﺍﻓﺘﺪ :ﺁﻳﺎ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻛﺎﻣ ﹰ
ﻼ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻱ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﻴـﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ،ﺗﺎﺏ ﺑﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ ـ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻳـﻚ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻓﺮﻣﺖﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻣﻨﺘﻘﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﻗﻔﻞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻳﻚ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻱ "ﺗﻮﻗﻒ /ﺧﺮﻭﺝ" ﺩﺭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻣﺪﺕ
ﺑﺮﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻫﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺻﻼﺡ ﻛﻨﺪ.
• ﺁﻳﺎ "ﻛﻤﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ" ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﻗﻄـﻊ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﻛﺎﺭﺁﻣﺪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻼﺕ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻛﻤﻚ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ
ﺣﺴـﺎﺱ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻓﺘﺎﺭ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻔﻬﻤﺪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﻣﺠﺒﻮﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻛﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﺭﻭﺵﻫـﺎﻱ ﺟﺴـﺘﺠﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺳـﺮ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴـﻦ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﭘﻴﻐﺎﻡﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺸﺎﻧﺪﻫﻨﺪﻩﻱ ﺧﻄﺎ
ﻼ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ،ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻭﻑ ﺑﺰﺭﮒ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺍﺗﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ؛ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻧﻈـﻴﺮ "ﻧﺤـﻮ ﻭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺍﺳﺖ" ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ .ﻣﺪﺍﺭﻙ ﭼﺎﭘﻲ ﺧﻮﺏ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻳﻚ ﺛﺮﻭﺕ ﺣﻘﻴﻘﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-6.htm 29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 3 of 5
ﻣﺮﻛـﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳـﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﺤﺴـﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻤﻨﺰﻟﻪﻱ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﺍﻱ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ،ﻧﺎﺷﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻏﺎﻟﺒ ﹰﺎ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ
ﺩﺳـﺖ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﺎﺷﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺑﺪﹰﺍ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﭼﺎﭘﻲ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻓﺎﻳﻞﻫﺎﻱ " "read meﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﺼﺐ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﺍﻛﺘﻔﺎ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤﺎﻱ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ
ﭘﺎﻳﮕـﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺎﻟﻲ "ﻓﻴﻢ " ) ( FAMEﻛﻪ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻣﻘﺎﻳﺴﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﺪﺩﻱ ﺣﺴﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﺷﺮﻛﺘﻲ
ﻼ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﻓﻬﻢ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﺪ. ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻣ ﹰ
ﺑـﺎ ﺭﺷﺪ ﻋﻈﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﺯﺍﺭ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ،ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﻃﻴﻒ ﮔﻤﺮﺍﻩﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﮔﻴﺞﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻧﺎﺷﺮ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻱ ـ ﻣﺜﻞ "ﺳﻴﻠﻮﺭ ﭘﻼﺗﺮ"
ﻳـﺎ "ﻧﺎﻳﺖﺭﻳﺪﺭ" ﺗـﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ،ﻧﻮﻋﻲ ﻳﻜﻨﻮﺍﺧﺘﻲ [ﻭ ﺍﺗﺤﺎﺩ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ] ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﻋﺎﻣﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ
ﻳـﻚ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺨﺰﻥ ﻫﺴﺖ
ﻛـﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ـ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻣﺤﺼﻮﻝ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ "ﻛﺎﺭﺧﺎﻧﻪ" ﭼﻪﺑﺴﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻼﺕ ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﻲ ﻭ
ﺁﺷﻨﺎﺳـﺎﺯﻱ ﺭﺍ ،ﻫـﻢ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻭ
ﺑﻴﺶﺗـﺮﻱ ﺗﻮﺳـﻂ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﻴـﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻭﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳـﺘﺮﺱ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﺮﻛﺘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ "ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﺳﺎﺯﻱ " ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ
ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻲﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﺩ
ﻳـﻚ ﻣﻨـﺒﻊ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻋﻼﻭﻩ ﺑﺮ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞﺍﻋﺘﻤﺎﺩ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﭘﺴﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺳﺮﻳﻊ ﻧﻴﺰ ـ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ
ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻫﺰﻳﻨـﻪ ﺑﺎﺻﺮﻓﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ـ ﻫﺴﺖ .ﺑﺎ ﮔﺬﺷﺖ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻭ ﺩﻫﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ،ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻓﺮﺽ
ﻛـﺮﺩ ﻛـﻪ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫـﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ "ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ" ـ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻧﮕﻮﻳﻴﻢ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎﻳﻲ ـ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺷﻮﺩ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ،ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ
ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
• ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻧﻜﺘـﻪ ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﻫﻤﻴﺸـﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣّﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ،ﺩﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ
ﺩﺍﺭﺩ :ﻛـﺎﻭﺵ ﺗﻮﺭّﻗـﻲ ﻭ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﺍﻱ .ﺷﻜﻞ ﺍﻭﻝ ،ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺍﻟﻔﺒﺎﻳﻲ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻪﺷﺪﻩ ﻫﺪﺍﻳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺁﻥ،
ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗـﺮﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ )ﻫﺎ ( ﺑـﻪ ﻋـﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻉ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺣـﺎﻟﺖ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﺍﻱ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ـ
ﺳﻴﺴـﺘﻢ ﺑـﻪ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ،ﺩﻗﻴﻘ ﹰﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻭﺍﺭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻱ ﺗﻮﺭﻗﻲ ،ﻫﺪﻑ ﺁﺳﺎﻥﺗﺮﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ
ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻ ﹰﺎ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻒ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ ﺗﺎ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺩﺭﺳـﺘﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴـﺎﻥ ﺍﻣﻼﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﻠﻤﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺎﻟﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣّﺎ ﻃﻴﻒ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﻭﺳﻴﻌﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﭽﻴﺪﻩﺗﺮ
ﭘﻴﺸـﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﻛـﺎﻭﺵ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﺍﻱ ﺑـﺎﻳﺪ ﺗـﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺩﻭ ﻳﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﻗﻴﻖﺗﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻴﺎﺯ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ
ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻫـﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪﻱ ﺧﻄﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﺍﻣﻼﻱ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎ ﻏﻠﻂ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ ﻧﺎﺩﺭﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻢ
ﺗـﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ،ﺣﺘـﻲ ﺍﮔـﺮ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﭼﻴﺰ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ
ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢﻫـﺎ ﻫـﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺣـﺎﻟﺖ ﻛـﺎﻭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﻭ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺻﻔﺤﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺣﺎﻟﺖﻫـﺎ ﻣﺸﺨﺺﺗـﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕـﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ـ ﻭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺣـﺎﻟﺖ ،ﻫﻤـﺎﻥ ﺷﻜﻞ ﭘﻴﺶﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
• ﺁﻳﺎ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻗﺎﺑﻠﻴﺖﻫـﺎ ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﮕﺮﻫـﺎﻱ ﺑﻮﻟـﻲ AND، ORﻭ NOTﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺗـﺮﻛﻴﺐ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫـﺎ ﺑـﺎ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕـﺮ ،ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ )
(truncationﺩْﻡﺑﺮﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ )(endingﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺨﺘﻠﻒ ﺭﻳﺸﻪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ،
ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﺧﻮﺩﻛـﺎﺭ ﺷﻜﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻔﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻊ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﻃﺮﺍﺣّﻲ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻣﺠﺎﻭﺭﺕ ﻟﻐﻮﻱ )Word
(Proximityﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ﺿﺮﻭﺭﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻏﻴﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ،
ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﻧـﺎﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﺯﻳـﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻓﻴﻠﺪ )ﺷﻴﻮﻩﺍﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺨﺶ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-6.htm 29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 4 of 5
ﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ "ﮔﺎﺭﺩﻳﻦ" ﻳﺎ "ﺗﺎﻳﻤﺰ" ،ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ
ﺧـﺎﺹ ﺍﺯ ﻳـﻚ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩ( ﻧـﻴﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴـﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ .ﻣـﺜ ﹰ
ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻣﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺁﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﻱ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻗﺒﻮﻝ ،ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ
ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻻﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ.
• ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻛﺪﺍﻡﻫﺎ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ؟
ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ "ﺍِﺭﻳﻚ " ،ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻱ ﺩﺭﻭﻧﺨﻄﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺣﻨﺎﻣﻪ ،ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﭼﻮﻥ
ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻱ ﺗﺼـﺎﺩﻓﻲ ﻣـﺮﻭﺭ ﺍﺭﺟﺎﻋـﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻳـﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺗﻮﺻـﻴﻔﮕﺮﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺿـﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻳﺎ ﻭﺍﮊﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ
ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺎﻧﺪ .ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺟﺎﻧﺒﻲ) ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﻲ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﻣﻲﺳﺎﺯﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻭﺍﮊﻩﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻱ ﺭﺍ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺳﭙﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺩﻫﺪ(
ﻣﻔـﻴﺪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫـﺪ ﺑـﻮﺩ ،ﭼـﻮﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻭﺍﺭﺩﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭﺍﮊﻩ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺻﺮﻓﻪﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ "ﻣﺸﺨﺺﻛﺮﺩﻥ") (Flagﺍﺳﺘﻨﺎﺩﺍﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺠﻼﺕ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻭﻳﮋﮔﻲ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ
ﺍﺳﺖ.
• ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﭼﻘﺪﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ)ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ )ﻳﺎ ﻫﺮ ﻛﻨﺶ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ( ﺗﺎ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻣﻲﻛﺸﺪ(؟
ﺑﻨـﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﺷـﻮﺍﻫﺪ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ١٥ﺛﺎﻧﻴﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﺑﻜﺸﺪ ـ ﻣﺪﺕ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻃﻮﻻﻧﻲﺗﺮ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻄﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻋﺼﺒﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ
ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭼـﻪ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓـﺰﺍﺭ ﺟﺴـﺘﺠﻮ ﺁﺷـﻜﺎﺭﺍ ﺗـﺄﺛﻴﺮ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﻦ ،ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ،
ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﻭ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﺳﺨﺖﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ـ ﻣﻌﻤﻮ ﹰﻻ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﺷﮕﺮ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺗﺮ ،ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﺳﺨﺖ
ﺳﺨﺖ ﺑﺰﺭﮒﺗﺮ ،ﻭ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﺧﻮﺍﻥ ﺳﺮﻳﻊﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﻛﺎﻫﺶ ﺩﺍﺩ.
• ﻧﺤﻮﻩﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﺩ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ؟
ﺑـﺎ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓـﺰﺍﺭ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗـﺮ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤـﺎﻝ ﺍﻳﻦﻛـﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺭﺑﻂ ﺭﺗﺒﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻨﺤﻮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻗﻼﻡ ،ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ
ﻧﻤـﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺭﺗﺒﻪﺑـﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﻣﺒﻨـﺎﻱ ﺭﺑـﻂ ،ﻫـﻨﻮﺯ ﺭﺍﻳﺞ ﻧﺸﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺜﻨﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻣﺘﻦ ﻛﺎﻣﻞ ،ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﺭﺍ ،ﻣﻌﻤﻮ ًﹶﻻ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺯﻣﺎﻧﻲ
ﻣﻌﻜـﻮﺱ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻲﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻨﺤﻮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﺩﻳﺪﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﻧﺪ .ﺑﻬﺮ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ
ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ،ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﻛﻮﺭﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺑﺘﺪﺍ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ـ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ،ﺩﺭﺻﻮﺭﺗﻲﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻧﻮﻣﻴﺪﻛﻨﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﺳﺖ.
• ﭼﻪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﭼﺎﭖ ﻭ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ؟
ﺍﻧﺘﻈـﺎﺭ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳـﻚ ﻛـﺎﻭﺵ ،ﺗﻮﺍﻧـﺎﻳﻲ ﺿﺒﻂ ﻳﺎ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﺎﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲﺷﺪﻩ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻈﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﺭ
ﻼ ﺿﺒﻂﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﺴﻚﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﺑﻴﺶﺗـﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﻗـﻊ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻓـﺮﺽ ﺻـﺤﻴﺢ ﺍﺳـﺖ ،ﻭﻟـﻲ ﺍﺳـﺘﺜﻨﺎﺋﺎﺗﻲ ﻧـﻴﺰ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ـ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
"ﺍﺳـﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ" ﻋﻤﻮﻣـ ﹰﺎ ﺍﻣﻜـﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴـﺖ ،ﭼـﻮﻥ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﺑـﻪ ﺷـﻜﻞ ﺗﺼﺎﻭﻳﺮ ﻧﻤﺎﺑﺮ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ،ﻧﻪ ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﻣﺘﻦ
"ﺍﹶﺳﻜﻲ")) (ASCIIﻛﺪ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺒﺎﺩﻝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ(.
• ﺁﻳﺎ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓﺰﺍﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮﺭ ﻛﻨﺘﺮﻝ ﺳﻄﺢ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﺩ ،ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ؟
ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫـﺎ ﻣﻜـﺮﺭﹰﺍ ﻧﻴـﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻠﻮﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻧﺤﺼﺎﺭﻱﺷﺪﻥ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﻣﻌﺪﻭﺩﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﭼﺎﭖ ﺭﺍ
ﻣﺤـﺪﻭﺩ ﻛﻨـﻨﺪ؛ ﻧﺮﻡﺍﻓـﺰﺍﺭﻱ ﻛـﻪ ﺑـﺘﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﻈﻴﻢ ﻣﻮﺿﻌﻲ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺖ ،ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﻗﻌﻴﺖﻫﺎ
ﻣﻮﺭﺩﺗﻮﺟـﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻧﻤـﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﺘﻐﻴﺮﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐﻫـﺎﻱ ﭼـﺎﭘﻲ ﻧـﻴﺰ ـ ﻛـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺸﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ
ﻣﻲﮔـﺮﺩﺩ ـ ﺑﺴـﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻔـﻴﺪ ﺍﺳـﺖ؛ ﭼـﺮﺍ ﻛـﻪ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﭘﻴﺶﮔﺰﻳﺪﻩ
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻛﺮﺩ.
ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯﻩ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻗﺒﻞ ﻛﻢﺗﺮ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﻫﺴﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺎﻳﮕﺎﻩ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺗﻬﻴﻪﻛﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎﻥ
ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ )ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻱ ﺁﻥ "ﻣﺪﻻﻳﻦ" ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ﻧﻮﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ
ﺗـﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ( ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ ﺭﺍ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﻲﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻡ ﻧﺴﺨﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﻗﻊ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-6.htm 29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ Page 5 of 5
ﻣـﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺭﺯﻳـﺎﺑﻲ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ؛ ﻧﻪﻓﻘﻂ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺠﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ ﻭ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻭﻧﺪﺍﺩ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﻃﻮﻝ ﻓﺎﻳﻞﻫﺎﻱ ﭘﺸﺘﻴﺒﺎﻥ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻱ
ﺗﻌﺪﺍﺩ ﺳﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺑﺮ ﺭﻭﻱ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ ،ﻭ ـ ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ـ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ.
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-6.htm 29/05/1381