American International University- Bangladesh (AIUB)
Faculty of Engineering (FE)
                                     ELECTRONIC DEVICES LAB
        Course Name :                                                         Course Code :        EEE 2104
                                             Spring -2023-2024
        Semester :                                                            Sec :                J
                                         MD. ALOMGIR KABIR
        Lab Instructor :                                                      Group:               3
        Experiment No :            07
        Experiment Name :          Study of BJT Biasing – Voltage Divider Circuit
        Submitted by (NAME):                                                  Student ID:
        Group Members                         ID                                        Name
                                           1. Istiaque Mahbub Isti                      22-49167-3
                                           2. Eshika Rani Pall                          22-49200-3
                                           3. Khadija Akter                             22-48295-3
                                                   Ibrahim Khalil Ullah
                                           4.                                           22-48301-3
                                                   Midul
                                           5. Wasif Asad Alvi                           22-46451-1
        Performance Date :         19/03/24                                   Due Date :                   3/04/2024
Marking Rubrics (to be filled by Lab Instructor)
                                Proficient                     Good                    Acceptable                                        Secured
       Category                                                                                                Unacceptable [1]
                                   [6]                          [4]                       [2]                                             Marks
                         All information,             All Information             Most information
      Theoretical                                                                                            Much information
                         measures and variables       provided that is            correct, but some
 Background, Methods                                                                                         missing and/or
                         are provided and             sufficient, but more        information may be
 & procedures sections                                                                                       inaccurate.
                         explained.                   explanation is needed.      missing or inaccurate.
                                                                                  Experimental results
                         All of the criteria are      Most criteria are met,
                                                                                  don’t match exactly        Experimental results
                         met; results are             but there may be some
        Results                                                                   with the theoretical       are missing or
                         described clearly and        lack of clarity and/or
                                                                                  values and/or analysis     incorrect;
                         accurately;                  incorrect information.
                                                                                  is unclear.
                         Demonstrates thorough        Hypotheses are clearly
                                                                                                             Conclusions don’t
                         and sophisticated            stated, but some            Some hypotheses
                                                                                                             match hypotheses, not
                         understanding.               concluding statements       missing or misstated;
      Discussion                                                                                             supported by data; no
                         Conclusions drawn are        not supported by data       conclusions not
                                                                                                             integration of data from
                         appropriate for              or data not well            supported by data.
                                                                                                             different sources.
                         analyses;                    integrated.
                         Title page, placement
                         of figures and figure
                                                      Minor errors in             Major errors and/or
  General formatting     captions, and other                                                                 Not proper style in text.
                                                      formatting.                 missing information.
                         formatting issues all
                         correct.
                         Writing is strong and
                                                      Writing is clear and
                         easy to understand;
                                                      easy to understand;         Most of the required
                         ideas are fully
                                                      ideas are connected;        criteria are met, but
                         elaborated and
      Writing &                                       effective transitions       some lack of clarity,      Very unclear, many
                         connected; effective
     organization                                     between sentences;          typographic, spelling,     errors.
                         transitions between
                                                      minor typographic,          or grammatical errors
                         sentences; no
                                                      spelling, or                are present.
                         typographic, spelling,
                                                      grammatical errors.
                         or grammatical errors.
                                                                                                                  Total Marks
      Comments:
                                                                                                                 (Out of    ):
Title: Study of BJT Biasing – Voltage Divider Circuit.
AbstractThis study delves into the application of voltage divider biasing in Bipolar Junction Transistors
(BJTs), pivotal for establishing stable operating points. Through thorough analysis and simulation, it
investigates the influence of resistor configurations on bias stability, signal amplification, and overall circuit
performance. Key parameters such as DC bias point, AC gain, and impedance characteristics are rigorously
examined, while also considering practical factors such as temperature effects and component tolerances.
The insights garnered from this study serve as valuable guidelines for optimizing BJT circuits to achieve
desired performance metrics and ensure reliability in various electronic applications.
Theory: The operating point (Q) of a BJT is very important for amplifiers since a wrong ‘Q’ point selection
increases amplifier distortion. It is imperative to have a stable ‘Q’ point, meaning that the operating point
should not be sensitive to variation in temperature or gain of BJT (β), which can vary widely. In this
experiment, a voltage divider bias circuit will be analyzed for two different β to check the stability of biasing
points. The analysis of the BJT circuits is a systematic process. Initially, the operating point of a transistor
circuit is determined then the small signal BJT model parameters are calculated. Finally, the DC sources are
eliminated, the BJT is replaced with an equivalent circuit model, and the resulting circuit is analyzed to
determine the voltage amplification (AV), current amplification (AI), Input impedance (Zi), Output
Impedance (Zo), and the phase relation () between the input voltage (Vi) and the output voltage (Vo). The
experiment is a very good practical realization of the Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT) biasing circuit. A
BJT biasing circuit will be designed and simulated to find a DC operating point using a circuit simulation
tool. Then a voltage divider bias BJT circuit will be implemented on the trainer board to find a DC operating
point for two different β of the transistor.
Circuit Diagram:
Figure 4: Circuit diagram for the study of CE transistor Voltage Divider bias circuit
Apparatus:
     No                                    Apparatus                                Quantity
     1                                   Trainer Board                                 1
                                    Transistor C828(NPN)                               1
     2                             Transistor BD135(NPN)                               1
                                                R=22KΩ                                          1
                                           RC= 470Ω                                             1
      3                                   RB1 = 10KΩ                                            1
                                                                                                1
                                           RE = 560Ω                                            1
                                     RB=500K(Potentiometer)
      4                            DC Power Supply (VCC = +15V DC)                              1
      5                                        Multimeter                                       1
      6                                   Power Supply Cable                                    1
Simulation:
Table:
                              β          VCE    VBE              VRC           IC     IB
           Fig. 4           488        7.84V 0.670V            3.26V       6.318mA 12.94 uA
                            345        7.69V 0.632V            3.19V        4.46mA 12.88 uA
       % of Change.        29.30%      1.91% 5.67%             2.15%        29.31%  0.46%
Discussion:
In this experiment, we studied a couple of BJT biasing circuits and calculated their operating points. First, we
measured the transistor’s β value and we implemented a circuit to obtain IB/IC values. By changing the bias current
(IB), we saw that the collector current (IC) changed almost β times. We noted these IC and
IB readings and calculated their β values by I C / IB. After completing all the necessary calculations, the values of I C and
IB were determined. The values from the simulation were also recorded. Comparing the measured and simulation
values there is a very small difference, which may have been caused by unavoidable human errors. Neglecting this,
the values can be considered fairly accurate.
References:
1. Robert L. Boyleston, Louis Natinsky, Electronic Devices and Circuit Theory, Ninth Edition, 2007-
2008
2. Adel S. Sidra, Kenneth C. Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, Saunders College Publishing, 3rd ed.,
ISBN: 0-03-051648-X, 1991.
3. American International University–Bangladesh (AIUB) Electronic Devices Lab Manual.
4. David J. Comer, Donald T. Comer, Fundamentals of Electronic Circuit Design, john Wiley & Sons
Canada, Ltd.; ISBN: 0471410160, 2002.