Textile Comfort: Khadi vs. Powerloom
Textile Comfort: Khadi vs. Powerloom
net/publication/289352707
CITATIONS READS
5 4,380
4 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Rajkishore Nayak on 02 March 2016.
GSM
Twill
300
Plain
Analysis of handle and comfort properties of fabrics 200
2.5 190
Khadi
Satin
GSM
2 180 Handloom
Twill
1.5 Powerloom
Plain 170
1
160
0.5
150
0
Plain Twill Satin
Khadi Handloom Powerloom
Weave type
Fabric type
Fig. 1: Effect of Fabric Type on Thickness 3.1: Effect of Weave Type on GSM
• Fabrics show decreasing trend in thickness values from • Plain woven fabrics are heavier than twill and satin
khadi to powerloom may be due to following: woven due to:
• Low twisted hand spun yarn used in khadi. • More no. of intersections in plain weave.
• Low beat-up force in hand weaving • More effective length of yarn in fabric.
Effect of weave on Thickness Air permeability
1.2
Air-permeability
1 900
Air-permeability (m3/m2/min)
Thickness (mm)
800
0.8
Khadi 700
0.6 Handloom 600
Powerloom 500 Satin
0.4
400 Twill
0.2 Plain
300
0 200
Plain Twill Satin 100
Weave type 0
Khadi Handloom Powerloom
Fig. 2: Effect of Weave Type on Thickness Fabric type
250
Warp Bending length
200 12
Khadi
150 Handloom
0
Fig. 5: Effect of Weave Type on Air Permeability
Khadi Handloom Powerloom
• Air permeability values of satin are higher than the twill Fabric Type
and plain woven fabrics due to:
Fig. 8 Effect of Fabric Type on bending length in warp
• Loose structure of satin. direction
• Floating of warp and weft yarns in satin. • Khadi fabrics show short bending length followed by
Crease Recovery handloom and powerloom fabrics due to:
• More weight of khadi fabric than handloom and
Crease Recovery Angle powerloom fabrics.
600 • Heavier fabric bends at lower length.
Crease Recovery Angle (deg)
500
Weft Bending length
400 9
Satin
8
Bending length (mm)
300 Twill
7
Plain
200 6
Satin
5
100 Twill
4
Plain
0 3
Khadi Handloom Powerloom 2
Fabric Type 1
0
Khadi Handloom Powerloom
Fig. 6: Effect of Fabric Type on Crease Recovery Angle
Fabric Type
• The fabrics show decreasing trend in crease recovery
angle values from khadi to power loom due to: Fig. 9 Effect of Fabric Type on bending length in weft
direction
• Lower thread density in khadi and handloom
fabrics.
Effect of weave on warp bending length
• In khadi, more freedom to fibers and yarns to move
so they recover more. 4.5
4
Bending length (mm)
Khadi
180 2.5
Handloom
160 2
140 Powerloom
1.5
120
Khadi
1
100 Handloom
0.5
80 Powerloom
0
60
40 Plain Twill Satin
20 Weave type
0
Plain Twill Satin
Weave type
Fig. 10 Effect of Weave Type on bending length in warp
Fig.7 : Effect of Weave Type on Crease Recovery Angle direction
3 F160(R) 160 141.50 53.27 3.42 28.70 41.00 33.5 6.1 6.0 187.00
2.5 Khadi F160(.5) 160 129.76 58.79 3.16 31.92 38.70 29.5 4.0 3.8 191.50
2 Handloom F160(1) 160 123.47 60.48 2.90 36.04 37.00 29.0 3.0 3.2 200.44
F160(1.5) 160 118.35 61.98 2.80 38.53 36.00 28.0 2.8 2.3 205.64
1.5 Powerloom
F190(R) 190 128.21 58.98 3.18 32.87 36.00 31.0 7.0 6.8 214.50
1
F190(.5) 190 121.55 60.84 3.01 35.80 35.00 29.0 4.8 4.0 220.90
0.5
F190(1) 190 112.30 62.67 2.70 39.09 33.80 28.2 4.5 3.2 225.10
0
F190(1.5) 190 100.90 62.94 2.68 40.77 32.90 27.5 3.0 2.7 235.60
Plain Twill Satin
F220(R) 220 113.23 61.18 2.90 37.22 30.50 22.0 6.5 7.0 239.00
Weave type
F220(.5) 220 100.90 62.45 2.63 41.00 29.00 20.3 3.5 3.8 244.90
F220(1) 220 91.36 65.07 2.50 43.39 27.80 19.5 2.9 3.5 246.30
Fig. 11 Effect of Weave Type on bending length in weft F220(1.5) 220 82.51 69.15 2.20 45.18 26.20 18.0 2.2 2.8 251.80
direction
• Plain weave gives lower values of bending length than Air-permeability
twill and satin due to:
Air-permeability
• More no. of intersections per repeat.
150
• More effective length of yarn in fabric.
Air-permeability
130
(m3/m2/min)
• More weight.
110 160 GSM
190 GSM
Warp Flexural rigidity 90 220 GSM
200
70
180
Warp Flexural rigidity
160 50
140 R 0.5 1 1.5
(mg/cm)
120 Satin
Softener conc. (%)
100 Twill
80 Plain Fig: 14 Influence of softener treatment on Air-permeability of
60
40 khadi fabric
20 • Air permeability value decreases with increasing conc.
0
Khadi Handloom Powerloom
of softener.
Fabric type • Also it decreases with an increase in weight for a
particular concentration of softener due to:
Fig. 12 Effect of Fabric Type on flexural rigidity in warp • The absorbed softener within fibers could block the
direction air space between fibers or yarns resulting in
decrease in air-permeability.
Weft Flexural rigidity
180 Water vapour permeability
Flexural rigidity (mg/cm)
160
140
Water Vapour Permeability
120 4
Satin
100
Absolute (Pam2W-1)
Twill 3.5
80
Plain 3
60 160 GSM
40 2.5 190 GSM
20 220 GSM
2
0
1.5
Khadi Handloom Powerloom
1
Fabric type
R 0.5 1 1.5
160 GSM
20
60 190 GSM
R 0.5 1 1.5
220 GSM
55
Softener conc. (%)
45
• The softener binds the fibers and yarns up to some
40
160 GSM limit and allows little freedom of movement to
35 190 GSM fibers.
220 GSM
30 Wickability
25
20 Wickability (Warp)
R 0.5 1 1.5
Softener Conc. (%) 8
Wickability (mm)
7
Fig: 17 Influence of softener treatment on thermal resistance
6
of khadi fabric 160 Warp
5 190 Warp
• Thermal resistance increases with increasing weight of 220 Warp
4
fabric.
3
• The trend is similar with increasing concentration of 2
softener due to: R 0.5 1 1.5
35
8
33
Wickability (mm)
7
Bending Length (mm)
31
6
29
5 160 Weft
27 160 Warp
4 190 Weft
25 190 Warp
3 220 Weft
23 220 Warp
2
21
1
19
17
0
15
R 0.5 1 1.5
R 0.5 1 1.5
oftener conc. (%)
Softener conc. (%)
Fig: 18 Influence of softener treatment on bending length of Fig: 21 Influence of softener treatment on wickability of
khadi fabric in warp direction khadi fabric in weft direction
190 GSM
200
The khadi fabric shows lower bending length values
220 GSM
followed by handloom and powerloom fabrics.
175
For a given set, air permeability values of satin fabrics were
150
R 0.5 1 1.5
higher than the twill and plain woven fabrics.
Softener conc. (%) Similar trend was also followed by the bending length.
Fig: 22 Influence of softener treatment on crease recovery of After softener treatment, khadi fabrics showed reduced air-
khadi fabric permeability values. Similar trend was observed for water
• Crease recovery value increases with increasing weight vapour permeability, bending length and wickability values.
of fabric. The values further decreased with increase in softener
concentration.
• The softener treated samples exhibit a higher CRA than
the untreated fabric due to: Thermal resistance and crease recovery values increase
The softener that promotes more inter fiber slippage. with the increase in concentration of softener.
Softener coating formed on the surface of fabric which
aids the fabric to recover from any crease
References:
1. M. Dhina karan, S. Sudaresan and B. S.Dasaradan, Indian Text. J , March(2007),77
2. www.textilereview.com
3. www.fibre2fashion.com
4. www.KIVC.org.in
5. L M Bekesius, MSc. Thesis, University of Guelph, 1975
6. L Fourt and NRS Hollies, Clothing comfort & function, Dekker, New York, 1970
7. E C Rod well and E T Ren bourn, of Greenland J & Kanchington KWL, Journel Text. Inst., 48(1975),624
8. C P Yoglou in 'Physiology of Heat Regulation', Harfner, New York
9. WH Rees, Shirley Link, summer, (1969), 5
10. K Greenwood in Third Shirley 'International Seminar', 1971
11. HW Best Gorden, Text month, June(1974),95
12. P O Fanger, British J industry Med, 10(1973),313
13. A Das, one day seminar on comfort in textiles, IIT, Delhi, Oct 16(2004),69
14. K Slater, Textile Prog., 9(4) (1977), 5
15. H M Yoon and A Buckley, Textile Res. J, 54(1984), 357
16. R Postle, Text. Asia, 20(7) (1989), 72
17. Fahmy SMA, Phd thesis, University of Guelph, 1974
18. R K Nayak. et al, Man-made Text India, Nov. (2006) 42
19. K Anderson, Ph.D., writer/reporter for [TC]². January 2007
20. M. Parthian, Indian J. of Fibre & Text. Res, 32 (2007), 446
21. I. Holme, Indian J. of Fibre & Text. Res, 31 (2006), 444