Mohd Muzammil

Question: - What are the indicators of a negative health and safety culture at the
Waterfront Cinema?

A negative health and safety culture at the Waterfront Cinema can be indicated by a lack of
training, communication, and accountability.
A negative health and safety culture at the Waterfront Cinema can be indicated by several
factors. Firstly, if there is a lack of proper training and education regarding health and safety
protocols, it may suggest a negative culture.
For example, if employees are not provided with clear guidelines on how to handle
emergencies or hazardous materials, it could lead to unsafe situations and accidents. Hat
overwhelmingly is.
1. Frequent accidents or incidents and the absence of more serious investigations and
solutions to problems that might ensure the safety of health and safety practices reveal in
concepts or miss injuries: based on this, quite evident would be failures to observe established
health and safety programs.
2. Absence of Proper Information and Training: Employees were not provided with the
necessary training or information to protect the health and safety of emergency procedures
or to use safety equipment. This lack of proper training is an indication of the absence or
negligence towards creating a safe working environment.
3. Poor Communication: Absence of open communication on safety matters and employees'
reluctance to report safety concerns or hazards due to fear of retaliation would suggest that
health and safety are definitely not top priority in the culture.
4. Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements: Ignoring or wrongful enforcement of the
safety regulations related to fire exits, proper equipment maintenance, and fire safety means
an awful concern for the means stipulated for health and safety purposes.
5. There Is No Attention towards Regular Inspections: No such inspections in that form are
carried out annually concerning monitoring safety equipment or the regular monitoring of
workplace electrical contacts/fires.
6. Absence of Clear Lines of Responsibility: It means that no effective ways exist to allocate
less clear lines with respect to health and safety, which weakens the steps that are taken to
ensure that the working area is safe.
7. Emergency Response Procedures Are Inadequate: It should be noted that an emergency
plan is poorly communicated or poorly executed, indicating that it does not prioritize health
and safety very much
8. Safe Practices Are Tolerated: Unsafe working practices ignored, allowed to continue or
become a part of everyday practice suggest a weak culture of safety that views employee
health as nothing

Page | 1
 Mohd Muzammil

2. Question: - Health and safety management systems – awareness and communication

Direct line of communication is established between the employees and management. An

effective HSMS can thereby be set up inside the organizations to facilitate communication of
the rules and procedures to the management and workers.
Promoting awareness and communication in HSMS are probably mentioning the three very
important communication purposes of the framework. These are as follows.

1. Policies and Procedures:

Dissemination: Policies governing health and safety should be made in writing and easily
accessible to all employees. In this way, it is ensured that everyone understands well enough
the importance of health and safety, as well as having his role to play. Regular Updates:
Besides, such regular communication (e.g., through sending emails, newsletter, or having
meetings) will keep staff informed about further changes in legislation or practices within the
organization.
2. Training and Education:
Induction Training: Full entry training for new employees should cover the rules and the
procedures on health and safety. The training should also include guidelines on the
emergency procedures, use of equipment and civil mechanisms of reporting. Continuous
Training: Periodic refresher training should be undertaken with all employees, and to
accommodate the legislative change in any of the risk prevention related to the risks. Training
Specific: This involves training those on the job in the dealing of specific risks using materials
such as electrical safety, handling hazardous materials, or first aid.
3. Employee Involvement:
Feedback from staff: Encourage employees to provide feedback if they perceive there is
something wrong with the procedure or in the event of hazards. This ensures that potential
risks are addressed proactively. Safety Committees: Employees make safety committees or
choose safety representatives to hear and answer their concerns on safety

Page | 2
 Mohd Muzammil

3 Question: - Comment on how effective FCC is at demonstrating top management

commitment

Evaluation of how effective it is to show top management commitment to health and safety is
through FCC's Waterfront Cinema. It can be determined through several key indicators that
determine sincere commitment from senior leadership to promulgate and ensure a safe
working atmosphere. These indicators relate to visible actions and cultural cues displayed to
emphasize top priorities of management.

Key Aspects of Effective Top Management Commitment:

1. Visible Leadership Involvement:
Regular Participation: If top management is actively taking part in health and safety
activities, then it seems to be a sign of an effective commitment. This may involve attending
safety meetings, conducting regular safety audits, or participating in training sessions to
show that they prioritize safety. Walkabouts and Inspections: Visible and frequent
management walkabouts and visits to shop floors where working conditions are checked and
also so that he or she can talk about safety with employees would indicate real hands-on
management in health and safety.
2. Resource Allocation:
Adequate Budgeting for Safety Initiatives: This can be seen in the budget allocation in safety
matters-training programs, equipment maintenance, and safety measures so that high input
can be shown to these areas. It suggests a strong message for management to ensure a safe
workplace. Investment in Safety Technology: A greater investment in modern safety devices,
management software, or betterment of infrastructure such as lighting and ventilation shows
management is more focused on risks to a minimum.
3. Health and Safety in the Strategic Goals:
Integration into Business Objectives: Health and safety must be integrated in the
organization's overall strategy since top management will adopt safety as a critical part of
their business vision. They may consider taking specific actions in line with these safety
targets. These targets could fulfil other obligations.

Page | 3
 Mohd Muzammil

4 Question: - The injury to the worker could have resulted in a serious injury. In this
case, it is likely that the labour inspectorate would ask labour inspectors to visit the
workplace

In the event of a workplace injury that could have resulted in a serious injury, it is highly
probable that a labour inspectorate would get involved to investigate the incident, especially
if there are concerns regarding noncompliance with health and safety regulations or if the
injury suggests a potential systemic failure in safety practices. Labour inspectors are typically
tasked with ensuring that workplaces adhere to legal safety standards and are required to
take action when incidents occur that put workers at significant risk.
Here’s what the labour inspectorate would likely do during such a visit:
1. Incident Investigation: Fact-Finding:
The inspectors would begin by gathering detailed information about the incident,
including how and why it occurred. This could involve interviewing the injured worker
(if possible), witnesses, and relevant employees or supervisors. Examination of the Injury:
Inspectors would review medical records or reports to understand the extent of the injury
and assess whether the workplace conditions contributed to the incident. Root Cause
Analysis: The inspectors should identify if unsafe working practices, poor training, and
malfunctioning machinery or other hazard identification and risk management procedures
contributed to the occurrence.
2. Examination of Occupational Health and Safety Policy:
Safety and Protection Plan:
The safety plan and policy and other standard working protocols dev eloped at the
workplace must be scrutinized if they are still up to date or well communicated with
employees to allow their correct practice.
Training Records:
They would examine records to ensure that employees are receiving adequate safety
training, especially on high-risk activities, equipment handling, and emergency
procedures.
Risk Assessments:
Inspectors would check if thorough risk assessments were conducted and whether hazards
were adequately identified and mitigated in the workplace.
Safety Equipment and Maintenance:
The inspectors would assess whether the necessary safety equipment was in place,
operational, and properly maintained. This includes things like personal protective
equipment (PPE), machinery safety features, and emergency exits.
3. Workplace Conditions:
Site Inspection: Inspectors would conduct a thorough walk-around of the workplace to
evaluate the overall safety of the environment. They would look for visible hazards such

Page | 4
 Mohd Muzammil

as unsafe work practices, poorly maintained equipment, or inadequate signage.

Compliance with Regulations: They would compare the workplace's practices against
local occupational health and safety regulations to ensure compliance. This includes
ensuring that the necessary safety measures, like fire extinguishers, first aid kits, and
emergency plans, are in place and functional.
4. Review of Previous Incidents and Records:
Accident History: Inspectors would likely review the workplace’s history of accidents and
near-misses to determine if this injury is part of a larger trend or if it’s an isolated incident. A
pattern of previous injuries may indicate deeper systemic safety failures. Previous Safety
Inspections: If there have been prior inspections or warnings, inspectors would review
whether the workplace has taken corrective action to address previous safety concerns.
5. Interviews and Worker Involvement:
Employee Interviews: Inspectors would conduct interviews with workers to understand their
perspective on safety in the workplace. They might inquire whether they feel safe at work, if
they have received proper training, and if they have raised concerns about safety in the past.
Employee Feedback on Safety Culture: The inspector may also gather feedback on the safety
culture within the organization, assessing whether employees feel encouraged to report safety
concerns and whether management responds appropriately to these reports.
1. Compliance Notices or Fines:
Non-compliance Action: If the labour inspectors identify that the workplace is in breach of
health and safety regulations, they may issue a compliance notice or fine. The notice could
require the employer to make specific changes, such as improving safety protocols, conducting
additional training, or repairing or replacing equipment. Enforcement Action: In worst cases,
especially a serious injury and death, there is a significant likelihood that this will be upgraded
to a problem, and appropriate legal or even criminal investigations or penalties against the
company
2. Follow-up actions Corrective Action Plan:
The employer would be expected to implement a corrective action plan addressing the
identified hazards and improving health and safety practices. Labour inspectors would often
set a deadline for when these actions must be completed. Re-inspection: A follow-up
inspection may be scheduled to ensure that corrective actions have been taken and that the
workplace is compliant with safety regulations.
3. Communication of Findings:
Reporting: After the inspection, the labour inspectorate would likely provide a detailed report
outlining their findings and any actions required. This report could be shared with the
employer and may also be made available to employees or the public, depending on the
jurisdiction.

Page | 5
 Mohd Muzammil

5. Question: - What administrative control measures could be put in place at the

Waterfront Cinema to help prevent a recurrence of the accident?

To help prevent the recurrence of the accident at Waterfront Cinema, it’s crucial to implement
administrative control measures. These measures are management-directed policies and
procedures that focus on changing work practices, scheduling, supervision, and
communication to reduce exposure to hazards. Here are some administrative controls that
could be put in place:
1. Revised Work Procedures:
 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs): Review and update standard operating procedures
for tasks that carry safety risks. This ensures that all workers are following a clear,
standardized process that minimizes the likelihood of accidents.
 Task-Specific Risk Assessments: For any high-risk activities, such as handling equipment,
cleaning, or working in confined spaces, conduct specific risk assessments and modify work
procedures accordingly.
2. Workplace Safety Training and Refresher Courses:
 Comprehensive Training Programs: Ensure all workers receive initial and ongoing
training in health and safety practices, including hazard identification, emergency
procedures, and the proper use of equipment. Training should cover both general safety
practices and job-specific risks.
 Regular Refresher Training: Hold refresher courses to reinforce safety protocols and ensure
that workers remain up-to-date with the latest safety procedures and regulations.
 Simulation and Drills: Regularly conduct safety drills, such as evacuation procedures or
emergency response drills, so that all employees are familiar with emergency processes in
case of an accident.
3. Safety Audits and Inspections:
 Routine Safety Inspections: Implement a regular schedule of workplace inspections to
identify hazards and unsafe practices before they lead to accidents. This should include checks
of equipment, fire exits, and general working conditions.
 Third-Party Audits: Periodically bring in external safety consultants or the labour
inspectorate to conduct thorough safety audits and ensure the workplace adheres to safety
regulations and industry best practices.
4. Clear Reporting and Incident Investigation Procedures:
 Incident Reporting System: Create a clear and easily accessible system for workers to
report hazards, unsafe conditions, or near-miss incidents. This system should ensure that
every report is logged, investigated, and addressed in a timely manner.
 Post-Incident Investigations: After any accident or near-miss, conduct a detailed
investigation to determine the root causes of the incident. This investigation should involve

Page | 6
 Mohd Muzammil

identifying contributing factors (e.g., lack of training, improper equipment, poor work
processes) and implementing corrective actions.
5. Job Rotation and Work Scheduling:
 Job Rotation: Implement job rotation where appropriate to reduce the risk of repetitive
strain injuries or fatigue-related accidents. Job rotation can also prevent employees from
being exposed to the same risks for extended periods.
 Work Breaks: Ensure that employees take regular breaks to reduce fatigue and prevent
lapses in focus or concentration, especially during physically demanding tasks.
5. Signage, Labels, and Clear Instructions:
 Safety Signage: Use clear and visible signage to indicate hazards, emergency exits, safety
equipment, and safety procedures. These signs should be strategically placed throughout the
workplace, especially in areas with heightened risks.
 Equipment Labels: Clearly label equipment with safety instructions and warnings to ensure
that employees are aware of how to operate machinery or tools safely.
6. Enhanced Supervision and Safety Leadership:
 Increased Supervision: Ensure that supervisors are actively involved in overseeing daily
operations and ensuring compliance with safety protocols. Supervisors should regularly
monitor staff to ensure they are following safe work practices.
 Designated Safety Officers: Appoint safety officers or champions who are responsible for
monitoring safety practices, providing advice, and ensuring that safety protocols are
consistently followed.
 Management Commitment to Safety: Top management should regularly communicate the
importance of safety and demonstrate commitment to improving safety standards. This could
involve setting safety-related goals and holding staff accountable for meeting those goals.
7. Clear Emergency Procedures:
 Emergency Response Plans: Ensure that all employees are familiar with emergency
response plans, including evacuation routes, first aid procedures, and how to report
emergencies. This information should be prominently displayed in all key areas.
 First Aid and Emergency Equipment: Ensure that first aid kits, fire extinguishers, and
emergency contact numbers are easily accessible. Regularly check and maintain the condition
of emergency equipment to ensure it is fully operational when needed.
8. Health and Safety Meetings:
 Regular Safety Meetings: Hold regular safety meetings where employees can discuss
potential hazards, review any accidents or near-misses, and suggest improvements. This
fosters a safety-oriented work culture and empowers workers to take an active role in
maintaining a safe environment.
 Safety Focus in Team Briefings: Incorporate safety discussions into daily or weekly team
briefings. This helps keep safety top-of-mind and reminds employees of important protocols.

Page | 7
 Mohd Muzammil

9. Documentation and Record-Keeping:

 Safety Records: Maintain thorough records of safety training, incident reports, inspections,
audits, and corrective actions. This helps track improvements, identify recurring issues, and
demonstrate compliance with health and safety regulations.
 Incident Trends: Regularly review incident and near-miss reports to identify trends or
patterns that could indicate systemic issues. Use this data to improve safety practices across
the organization.
10. Employee Involvement and Feedback:
 Safety Committees: Establish a safety committee that includes representatives from various
departments. This committee can review safety protocols, report hazards, and make
recommendations for improvements.
 Feedback Mechanism: Create a mechanism where employees can provide ongoing feedback
about safety practices. Actively seek their input and ensure that they feel their concerns are
valued and addressed.

Page | 8
 Mohd Muzammil

6. Question: - What individual human factors are likely to have influenced the
behaviour of the injured worker?

The individual human factors that could have led to the injured worker’s behaviour include:
Accidents often result from a combination of personal attributes, mental states, and
environmental factors. Some of the key human factors that may have contributed to the
worker's behaviour leading up to the injury are:
1. Fatigue:
Their impact on decision making: Fatigue can impair a worker's concentration and reaction
time and capacity for sound judgment. Therefore, if the worker was tired or working for
extended hours without breaks, he or she may not have been able to fully focus on task
requirements and may have been more likely to be careless and, in turn, increase an accident.
Physical Impact: Tiredness may also result in physical exhaustion, which can make workers
use inappropriate posture or handling techniques, thereby causing injuries.
2. Stress or Mental Health Issues:
Cognitive Distraction: Stress, anxiety, or other mental health issues in the personal or
professional life can distract the attention and focus of workers, and they are more likely to
miss a hazard or not follow the safety procedure. If the worker was under some external
pressure, it could have distracted him from focusing on the job. Overworking or Burnout:
Stress from heavy workloads or long hours could cause mental fatigue, which diminishes
cognitive functions, making it harder to stay vigilant and aware of safety hazards.
3. Complacency or Overconfidence:
Underestimating Risks: If the worker had performed the same task many times without
incident, they may have become complacent or overconfident, underestimating the potential
risks. This can lead to ignoring safety procedures or taking shortcuts that increase the
likelihood of an accident. "It Won't Happen to Me" Attitude: In some cases, workers may
think they are immune to accidents or believe they can handle risky situations because of
their experience. This sense of invulnerability can lead to reckless or unsafe behaviour.
4. Lack of Safety Awareness or Knowledge:
Insufficient Training: If the worker had not received adequate training for the task or did not
fully understand the potential risks involved, they might have failed to recognize hazards or
make the right safety choices. Misunderstanding Safety Protocols: A worker who is confused
or does not understand safety protocols may not take the necessary precautions. This could
be because of unclear instructions, inadequate training, or lack of reinforcement of safety
practices.
5. Risk-Taking Behaviour:
Tolerance for Risk: Some individuals may have a higher personal tolerance for risk, which
could lead them to make unsafe choices. For example, if the worker took shortcuts to save
time, bypassing safety measures in the process, this could have contributed to the injury. Peer
influence. In such cases, where a few at work engaged in dangerous activities or observed

Page | 9
 Mohd Muzammil

neglecting safe operating practices, the worker injured would likely be encouraged to
continue similar acts if they operated within environments with dominant "unsafe norms".
6. Lack of communication or lack of hazard awareness:
Unclear Instructions or Miscommunication: If the worker did not clearly understand the task
they were supposed to complete, or if there was miscommunication between team members
or supervisors, it might have resulted in unsafe actions. Failure to Recognize Hazards: If the
worker was not adequately informed about specific hazards (e.g., equipment malfunctions,
unsafe working conditions), they may not have been fully aware of the risks they were taking.
7. Diversion or Multitasking: Lack of attention:
If the employee was distracted by other work, talking, or personal issues, they might not have
paid attention or properly evaluated danger and ended up being involved in an accident.
Multitasking specifically spreads a person's attention too thin, leading to mistakes.
Environmental causes: Distractions by the environment can also be blame d on a worker
failing to see danger, thus acting in a dangerous manner. Some environmental distraction ns
include noise, lack of proper signage, and an untidy workplace.
8. Physical Factors (Health and Fitness):
Physical Limitations or Impairment: If the worker had any physical impairments, whether
temporary (e.g., an injury or illness) or chronic (e.g., musculoskeletal issues), they might have
been less able to perform tasks safely or handle equipment properly, increasing the likelihood
of an accident. Substance Use: Drugs, alcohol, or even over-the-counter medications affect
their ability to concentrate and make safe decisions. While it is not common, it does contribute
to risky behaviour and accidents.
9. Decisions Made Under Stress:
Time Pressure or Deadlines: If the worker was under pressure to complete tasks quickly or
meet tight deadlines, they might have rushed their work, cutting corners or ignoring safety
protocols in the interest of speed. Lack of Support: If the worker felt unsupported or lacked
adequate supervision, they might have made unsafe decisions, either due to lack of guidance
or because they did not feel empowered to take breaks or report hazards.
10. Personality and Behavioural Traits:
Personality Traits: Certain personality traits, such as a tendency toward impulsivity, a desire
to prove oneself, or a lack of attention to detail, could influence a worker’s decisions in high-
risk situations. Failure to Ask for Help: Some workers might be reluctant to ask for assistance,
even when it would be the safer choice. This could lead to the worker undertaking tasks they
are not fully prepared for, resulting in an accident.

Page | 10
 Mohd Muzammil

6. Question: - What job factors are likely to have influenced the behaviour of the
injured worker?

The job factors that may have influenced the behaviour of the injured worker are related to
the specific conditions and demands of the work environment, the nature of the tasks being
performed, and the overall organizational culture. These factors are often interlinked with
individual human factors but focus more on the job itself and the organizational framework
that surrounds it. Here are some key job-related factors that could have contributed to the
worker's behaviour leading to the injury:

1. Workload and Job Demands: High Workload:

If the worker was tasked with an excessive workload, they may have been under pressure to
complete tasks quickly, which could lead to rushing or cutting corners, ultimately
compromising safety. This could also lead to fatigue and decreased attention, increasing the
likelihood of errors. Multiple Tasks: Workers who are required to juggle several tasks at once
may become distracted or overwhelmed, which can result in unsafe work practices. For
example, if the worker was handling multiple responsibilities at the same time, they might
have missed hazards or failed to follow safety protocols properly. Tight Deadlines: The
pressure to meet tight deadlines can influence a worker to prioritize speed over safety. In an
environment where productivity is emphasized, workers may be tempted to take shortcuts or
skip safety steps to finish tasks on time.
2. Task Complexity and Job Role:
Complex or Unfamiliar Tasks: If the worker was performing a task that was complex or
outside of their usual job duties, they may have lacked the necessary knowledge, skills, or
experience to carry it out safely. Inadequate familiarity with tasks or improper training for
specific tasks increases the likelihood of errors and accidents. Lack of Task Clarity: Ambiguity
about job tasks or unclear instructions can lead to confusion and unsafe practices. If the
worker didn’t fully understand the requirements of the task or the specific safety procedures,
they might have taken unsafe actions. Repetitive Work: As time passes, complacency or the
lack of concentration might arise due to repetition. The employee might have repeated the
same job over and over again and not paid attention at the end while doing it.
3. Safety Culture and Environment:
Poor Safety Culture: If the workplace has a poor safety culture, where safety is not prioritized,
or safety procedures are not consistently enforced, workers may be less likely to follow proper
safety protocols. A culture where safety rules are frequently bypassed or ignored can influence
workers to adopt unsafe practices. Lack of Safety Support: If supervisors or managers did not
actively support or enforce safety practices, the worker may have felt little motivation to
follow safety procedures. Inadequate supervision can lead workers to believe that safety is not
a priority, causing them to take unnecessary risks. Low Perceived Consequences: In
environments where safety violations are rarely addressed or punished, workers may feel that
taking risks is acceptable. A lack of consequences for unsafe actions can lead to repeated risky
behaviours, which might contribute to accidents.

Page | 11
 Mohd Muzammil

4. Work Environment and Conditions:

Physical Environment: The physical conditions of the workplace, such as lighting,
ventilation, temperature, noise, or clutter, can have a significant impact on worker safety.
Poorly lit areas, noisy environments, or cluttered spaces may distract or hinder the worker’s
ability to spot potential hazards.
Workplace Ergonomics: If the worker was in a poorly designed workspace or had to perform
tasks in uncomfortable or awkward positions, this could have led to fatigue or physical strain.
Poor ergonomics can also cause workers to adopt unsafe postures or techniques to
compensate for discomfort.
Hazardous Work Conditions: The presence of specific hazards—such as slippery floors,
unguarded machinery, or exposed electrical wiring—can create a dangerous work
environment. If the worker had not been properly trained to recognize or mitigate these
hazards, they may have unknowingly put themselves in harm’s way.
5. Equipment and Tools: Faulty or Inadequate Equipment:
If the worker was using equipment that was malfunctioning, outdated, or not suitable for the
task, this could have contributed to the accident. For example, faulty machinery, improperly
maintained tools, or equipment without adequate safety features could have led to an unsafe
working environment. Lack of Proper Tools or PPE: If the worker was not provided with the
correct tools, safety gear, or personal protective equipment (PPE), they might have been at
greater risk of injury. Inadequate or poorly maintained safety equipment, such as protective
gloves, helmets, or eyewear, can increase the likelihood of accidents.
6. Workplace Policies and Procedures:
Lack of Clear Safety Procedures: If the worker was not fully aware of the proper safety
procedures or if those procedures were not clearly communicated, they may not have followed
them. It’s critical for safety protocols to be clear, accessible, and regularly updated to ensure
they are followed effectively. Inconsistent Enforcement of Safety Rules: If safety policies were
not consistently enforced or if workers were allowed to bypass them regularly, the worker
may have developed a habit of neglecting safety measures. This can create a culture where
adherence to safety protocols is optional, leading to an increased risk of accidents. Inadequate
Supervision or Oversight: If supervisors or managers did not adequately oversee the worker’s
actions, they may have been allowed to engage in unsafe behaviour without correction. Lack
of supervision may allow workers to take shortcuts or overlook safety protocols without being
noticed.
7. Communication and Coordination:
Poor Communication: Inadequate communication between workers, supervisors, or team
members can lead to misunderstandings or misalignment about safety expectations. For
example, if the worker was not informed of a hazard, a change in procedure, or the correct
way to perform a task, they might unknowingly engage in unsafe practices. Coordination
between Teams: If the worker was part of a team or working alongside others, poor
coordination or lack of teamwork can lead to accidents. For instance, workers may be unaware
of each other’s tasks or actions, resulting in unsafe situations or accidents (e.g., someone not
warning a colleague of a potential hazard).

Page | 12
 Mohd Muzammil

8. Time Pressure and Scheduling:

Rushed Work or Time Pressure: If the worker was under pressure to complete a task quickly
or meet a deadline, they might have prioritized speed over safety, which can lead to accidents.
Time constraints can lead to rushing, which can result in overlooking important safety steps.
Shift Length and Scheduling: Long shifts or inadequate breaks can lead to fatigue, impairing
the worker’s ability to remain alert and focused on safety. A demanding work schedule can
make it difficult for workers to stay physically and mentally sharp, which increases the
likelihood of accidents.
9. Organizational Support and Resources:
Lack of Training and Support: If the worker did not receive proper training, guidance, or
mentorship, they may have been inadequately prepared for the task, increasing the risk of
errors. Lack of resources, such as safety materials or updated equipment, can also make it
more difficult to perform tasks safely. Inadequate Feedback or Corrective Action: If unsafe
behaviours or mistakes were not addressed by management, workers might have continued
with unsafe practices, believing that their actions were acceptable. Regular feedback and
corrective action are necessary to ensure continuous improvement in safety.

Page | 13