POLITICAL THEORY (MPS-001)

TUTOR MARKED ASSIGNMENT

Course Code: MPS-001

Assignment Code: Asst/TMA/2024-25
Marks: 100

Answer five questions in all, selecting at least two questions from each section.
Each question is to be answered in about 500 words. Each question carries 20
marks.

SECTION- I

1. Trace the evolution of political theory.

2. Examine Procedural and Substantive democracy.

3. Discuss the meaning and nature of rights.

4. Elaborate upon negative liberty.

5. Trace the struggle for equality.

SECTION- II

Write a short note on each part of the following questions in about 250 words:

6. (a) John Rawl’s critique of Utilitarianism

(b) Significance of duty

7. (a) Forms of citizenship

(b) Party as Vanguard of the Proletariat (V. I. Lenin)

8. (a) Sovereignty
(b) Classical liberalism

9. (a) Welfare state

(b) Libertarianism

10. (a) Historical Materialism

(b) Gramsci’s concept of Hegemony
 1

MPS-001
SOLVED ASSIGNMENT 2024-25

Note: Attempt any five questions. 20*5 = 100 Marks

SECTION - I
Q.1 - Trace the evolution of political theory.
ANS.- Evolution of Political Theory
Political theory, the study of ideas about politics, governance, and power, has evolved significantly over
centuries, reflecting changes in societies, governments, and intellectual landscapes. This evolution can be
traced through key historical periods and influential thinkers.
1. Classical Political Theory (Ancient Greece and Rome)
The foundations of Western political theory were laid in ancient Greece. Thinkers like Plato and Aristotle
provided early analyses of political systems and ideas.
 Plato (c. 428-348 BCE): In his work The Republic, Plato explored justice, the ideal state, and the
role of philosopher-kings. He proposed a three-tiered society consisting of rulers, warriors, and
producers, advocating for a state governed by wisdom and reason.
 Aristotle (384-322 BCE): A student of Plato, Aristotle's Politics examined various forms of
government, including monarchies, aristocracies, and democracies. He emphasized the concept
of the “best” government, which should aim to achieve the common good and balance different
societal elements.
The Roman period saw the development of political theory through the works of Cicero and Seneca.
Cicero’s writings on republicanism and natural law influenced later political thought, emphasizing the
 2

role of reason and law in governance. Seneca’s Stoic philosophy contributed to discussions on ethics and
political virtue.
2. Medieval Political Theory (5th to 15th Century)
The medieval period was marked by the synthesis of classical thought with religious doctrine.
 Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE): His work The City of God contrasted the earthly city with the
heavenly city, focusing on the role of divine providence in human affairs and the importance of
moral virtue.
 Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274): Aquinas integrated Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology
in his Summa Theologica. He argued for a natural law theory, positing that human laws should
reflect natural moral principles and divine law.
Political theory during this period was often intertwined with theological considerations, emphasizing
the divine right of kings and the moral responsibilities of rulers.
3. Early Modern Political Theory (16th to 18th Century)
The early modern period saw a shift towards secular and empirical approaches to political theory.
 Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527): In The Prince, Machiavelli examined power politics, focusing on
realpolitik and the pragmatic, often ruthless measures required for political success. His work
marked a departure from idealism, emphasizing the effectiveness of governance over moral
considerations.
 Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679): Hobbes’s Leviathan introduced the social contract theory, arguing
that in a state of nature, individuals act out of self-interest, necessitating a powerful sovereign to
ensure order and prevent chaos. His view of human nature was fundamentally pessimistic,
emphasizing the need for absolute authority.
 John Locke (1632-1704): Locke’s Two Treatises of Government offered a more optimistic view of
human nature and argued for natural rights and government by consent. His ideas about the right
to property, liberty, and the separation of powers influenced modern democratic thought.
 Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778): Rousseau’s The Social Contract proposed a model of direct
democracy and emphasized the general will as the basis of legitimate political authority. He
critiqued existing political institutions and championed the idea of popular sovereignty.
4. Modern Political Theory (19th Century to Present)
Modern political theory has continued to evolve, reflecting complex societal changes and ideologies.
 Karl Marx (1818-1883): Marx’s analysis of capitalism in The Communist Manifesto and Das
Kapital focused on class struggle and historical materialism. He argued that the capitalist system
exploits workers and predicted its eventual overthrow in favor of a classless society.
 John Stuart Mill (1806-1873): Mill’s work, including On Liberty and Utilitarianism, emphasized
individual freedoms and the principle of utility. He argued for the protection of individual rights
and the role of public opinion in shaping government policies.
 3

 Max Weber (1864-1920): Weber’s writings on bureaucracy, authority, and rationalization

explored the dynamics of modern state structures. His analysis of the “Protestant Ethic” in
shaping capitalism and his theories on bureaucracy and leadership remain influential.
 Michel Foucault (1926-1984): Foucault’s work on power, knowledge, and discipline introduced
new perspectives on how power operates within society. His analysis of institutions, such as
prisons and hospitals, revealed the pervasive and often subtle nature of power.
 Judith Butler (b. 1956): In recent decades, Butler’s work on gender theory and performativity,
particularly in Gender Trouble, has influenced contemporary political theory by challenging
traditional notions of gender and identity.
Conclusion
The evolution of political theory reflects humanity's changing understanding of governance, power, and
society. From the idealistic visions of ancient Greece to the empirical and critical approaches of modern
theorists, political theory has continually adapted to address new challenges and insights. This rich
history provides a foundation for contemporary discussions on politics and governance, illustrating the
ongoing relevance and dynamism of political thought.

Q.2 - Examine Procedural and Substantive democracy

ANS.- Introduction
Democracy, in its broadest sense, is a system of government where power is vested in the people, either
directly or through elected representatives. However, democracy can be categorized into different types
based on its functioning and principles. Two significant concepts in democratic theory are procedural
democracy and substantive democracy. While both aim to establish a government that reflects the will
of the people, they differ in their approach and focus.
Procedural Democracy
Procedural democracy, often referred to as "minimalist" or "formal" democracy, emphasizes the
processes and mechanisms through which democratic decisions are made. It focuses on the procedures
that ensure fair and regular elections, the protection of political rights, and adherence to legal
frameworks. In a procedural democracy, the key elements include:
1. Regular Elections: Central to procedural democracy is the holding of regular, free, and fair
elections. This ensures that leaders are accountable to the electorate and can be replaced if they
fail to meet the expectations of the people.
2. Rule of Law: Procedural democracy upholds the rule of law, meaning that laws apply equally to
all citizens and that government actions are bound by legal constraints. This includes the
protection of individual rights and the enforcement of legal norms.
3. Political Pluralism: A procedural democracy supports the existence of multiple political parties
and interest groups. This pluralism ensures that diverse viewpoints can compete in the political
arena, providing voters with a range of choices.
 4

4. Civil Liberties: Fundamental freedoms such as freedom of speech, assembly, and press are
safeguarded in a procedural democracy. These liberties are crucial for enabling public debate and
dissent, which are essential for a functioning democratic process.
Substantive Democracy
Substantive democracy, in contrast, goes beyond mere procedures and focuses on the quality and
outcomes of democratic governance. It assesses whether the democratic process genuinely fulfills the
principles of justice, equality, and human rights. Key aspects of substantive democracy include:
1. Equality and Social Justice: Substantive democracy emphasizes the importance of addressing
social inequalities and ensuring that democratic processes result in fair and just outcomes. This
means not only providing equal opportunities but also working towards reducing disparities in
wealth, education, and healthcare.
2. Effective Participation: In a substantive democracy, the focus is on the actual impact of political
participation. It assesses whether all citizens have meaningful opportunities to influence decisions
and whether their voices are heard and considered in policymaking.
3. Protection of Minority Rights: Substantive democracy places a strong emphasis on the protection
of minority rights and ensuring that the majority rule does not lead to the oppression of minority
groups. This includes safeguarding cultural, ethnic, and linguistic diversity.
4. Government Accountability and Transparency: Beyond procedural checks, substantive
democracy demands that governments are not only accountable but also transparent in their
actions. This includes the prevention of corruption and the promotion of integrity in public office.
Comparative Analysis
While procedural and substantive democracies are related, they highlight different aspects of democratic
governance:
 Procedural Democracy: Emphasizes the mechanics of democratic systems—how decisions are
made and how political processes are structured. It focuses on the fairness of elections,
adherence to legal norms, and protection of civil liberties. However, procedural democracy alone
does not guarantee that the outcomes of these processes will be just or equitable.
 Substantive Democracy: Concerned with the results and impacts of democratic processes. It
evaluates whether democratic systems lead to fair and just policies and whether they address
social inequalities and protect minority rights. Substantive democracy assesses the effectiveness
of democratic governance in achieving broader societal goals beyond mere procedural
correctness.
Conclusion
In summary, procedural democracy and substantive democracy represent two important dimensions of
democratic governance. Procedural democracy focuses on the processes and structures that make
democracy possible, ensuring that elections are fair, laws are upheld, and political freedoms are
protected. Substantive democracy, on the other hand, evaluates the effectiveness of these processes in
achieving justice, equality, and meaningful participation. A comprehensive democratic system ideally
 5

incorporates both procedural and substantive elements, striving not only for fair procedures but also for
outcomes that truly reflect democratic ideals and promote social justice.

Q.3 - Discuss the meaning and nature of rights.

ANS.- Introduction
Rights are fundamental concepts in political philosophy and law, often seen as the cornerstone of
modern democracies and human rights discourse. They are deeply embedded in the social, political, and
legal fabric of societies, shaping the interactions between individuals and the state. This discussion aims
to elucidate the meaning and nature of rights, examining their different types, origins, and implications.
Definition and Conceptualization
At its core, a right can be defined as an entitlement or a claim that a person has, which is recognized and
protected by a legal or moral authority. Rights can be seen as the justified expectations individuals have
regarding the treatment they receive from others, including both individuals and institutions. They
encompass both freedoms (such as freedom of speech) and claims (such as the right to education).
Rights are often categorized into various types, each serving different functions:
1. Natural Rights: These are rights believed to be inherent and universal, not contingent on laws or
customs. Philosophers like John Locke argued that natural rights are derived from natural law and
include the right to life, liberty, and property. Natural rights are considered fundamental to
human existence and are often invoked in discussions about human rights and justice.
2. Legal Rights: These rights are established and enforced by legal systems and statutes. Legal rights
vary between jurisdictions and are articulated in constitutions, laws, and regulations. Examples
include the right to vote, the right to a fair trial, and the right to privacy. Legal rights are context-
specific and can evolve with changes in law and policy.
3. Moral Rights: These are based on ethical principles and norms. Moral rights often align with or
inform legal rights but are grounded in moral philosophy rather than legal statutes. They include
the right to be treated with dignity and respect and the right to equality and fairness.
4. Economic and Social Rights: These include rights that ensure access to basic necessities and
opportunities for a decent quality of life. Examples include the right to education, health care,
and an adequate standard of living. These rights emphasize the role of the state in providing
social welfare and addressing economic inequalities.
Nature of Rights
The nature of rights can be understood through several key characteristics:
1. Universality: Many rights are considered universal, applying to all individuals regardless of their
status or location. For example, human rights are often viewed as universally applicable,
advocating for the inherent dignity and equality of all people.
2. Inalienability: Rights are often described as inalienable, meaning they cannot be surrendered,
transferred, or waived. This characteristic underscores the fundamental nature of certain rights,
such as the right to life and freedom from torture.
 6

3. Indivisibility: Rights are interrelated and interdependent. The violation of one right can affect the
enjoyment of others. For instance, the right to education is closely linked to the right to work and
the right to participate in cultural life.
4. Justiciability: Some rights can be legally enforced or adjudicated by courts. The justiciability of
rights refers to the capacity of rights to be claimed and protected through legal mechanisms,
allowing individuals to seek redress and accountability.
Origins and Theories
Theories about the origins of rights provide insights into their nature and justification:
1. Social Contract Theory: According to this theory, rights arise from an implicit social contract
between individuals and the state. Philosophers like Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-
Jacques Rousseau posited that individuals agree to form a society and abide by certain rules in
exchange for the protection of their rights.
2. Legal Positivism: This theory asserts that rights are created and defined by legal systems.
According to legal positivists, rights exist because they are recognized and enforced by legal
institutions, rather than being inherent or self-evident.
3. Natural Law Theory: Natural law theorists argue that rights are derived from moral principles
that are inherent in the nature of human beings and the natural order. These rights are seen as
pre-existing and are often invoked in arguments about justice and morality.
Implications and Challenges
Rights play a crucial role in shaping individual freedoms, social justice, and legal protections. They
provide a framework for evaluating and addressing issues of inequality, discrimination, and abuse.
However, the implementation and protection of rights can face challenges, including:
 Conflicts of Rights: In cases where different rights or interests collide, determining which right
should take precedence can be complex. For example, the right to freedom of expression may
come into conflict with the right to privacy.
 Cultural and Contextual Variations: The interpretation and application of rights can vary across
cultures and legal systems, leading to debates about the universality and cultural relativity of
rights.
 Enforcement and Protection: Ensuring that rights are respected and upheld requires effective
legal frameworks, institutions, and mechanisms. The enforcement of rights can be hampered by
political, social, and economic factors.
Conclusion
Rights are fundamental to understanding individual freedoms, social justice, and legal obligations. They
encompass a range of entitlements and claims that are recognized and protected by moral, legal, and
social frameworks. Understanding the nature and scope of rights involves exploring their types, origins,
and implications, as well as addressing the challenges associated with their enforcement and protection.
 7

SECTION - II
Q.6 a)- John Rawl’s critique of Utilitarianism
ANS.- John Rawls, in his seminal work A Theory of Justice (1971), provides a robust critique of utilitarianism,
which he argues fails to respect the principles of justice and individual rights. His critique revolves around three
central points:
1. Violation of Individual Rights
Rawls argues that utilitarianism, which aims to maximize overall happiness or utility, can justify the
sacrifice of individual rights for the greater good. According to utilitarian principles, if violating an
individual's rights or liberties results in a greater overall benefit, then such actions could be deemed
morally acceptable. Rawls contends that this is problematic because it permits the exploitation or harm
of individuals if it benefits the majority. This approach undermines the idea of justice as fairness and
disregards the moral importance of each individual's rights and dignity.
2. Lack of Justice as Fairness
Utilitarianism does not offer a way to ensure that benefits and burdens are distributed fairly among
individuals. It focuses solely on the total or average utility without regard for how it is distributed. Rawls,
on the other hand, introduces the concept of "justice as fairness," which emphasizes the need for
principles that ensure fair distribution of resources and opportunities. His theory advocates for the
"original position" and the "veil of ignorance," where individuals design a just society without knowing
their own position within it. This process aims to establish fair principles that safeguard individual rights
and ensure equitable distribution, contrary to utilitarianism’s focus on aggregate welfare.
3. Impersonal Nature of Utilitarianism
Rawls criticizes utilitarianism for its impersonal approach to justice. Utilitarian calculations are made
from an aggregate perspective, which often overlooks the personal and emotional aspects of individuals’
lives. By focusing solely on the maximization of overall utility, utilitarianism neglects the personal
significance of justice and fairness in individuals' lives. Rawls argues for a theory that respects each
person's interests and provides a framework for individuals to live with a sense of personal justice and
respect.
In summary, Rawls's critique of utilitarianism highlights its inadequacies in addressing individual rights,
ensuring fair distribution, and considering personal aspects of justice. Rawls proposes an alternative that
seeks to balance individual rights with social welfare, aiming to create a more equitable and just society.

b)- Significance of duty

ANS.- Duty, as a fundamental concept, plays a crucial role in shaping individual behavior and societal norms. It
encompasses the responsibilities and obligations individuals have towards themselves, others, and society at
large. The significance of duty can be explored through various dimensions:
 8

1. Ethical Foundation: Duty forms the ethical backbone of personal and professional conduct. It drives
individuals to act in accordance with moral principles and values. For instance, in the workplace,
employees are expected to fulfill their roles diligently and honestly. This sense of duty fosters trust and
integrity, essential for a productive and harmonious work environment.
2. Social Responsibility: On a societal level, duty manifests as social responsibility. Individuals are
expected to contribute positively to their communities and address societal issues. This could involve
volunteering, supporting charitable causes, or participating in civic activities. By embracing their social
duties, individuals help build stronger, more cohesive communities and promote social welfare.
3. Legal and Civic Obligations: Duty is also integral to the legal and civic framework of societies. Laws
and regulations often prescribe duties that individuals must follow, such as paying taxes or serving on
juries. These obligations ensure the smooth functioning of societal systems and uphold justice.
Compliance with legal duties is crucial for maintaining order and protecting individual rights.
4. Personal Development: Fulfilling one’s duties contributes to personal growth and self-discipline. By
adhering to responsibilities, individuals develop a sense of accountability and reliability. This personal
development is essential for achieving long-term goals and building a positive reputation. For example,
students who diligently attend classes and complete assignments are more likely to achieve academic
success and personal satisfaction.
5. Ethical Decision-Making: In decision-making processes, duty provides a framework for evaluating
choices. It helps individuals prioritize actions that align with their responsibilities and moral values. This
ethical guidance is particularly important in complex situations where competing interests and values are
at play.
In conclusion, the significance of duty lies in its ability to guide ethical behavior, promote social
responsibility, ensure legal compliance, foster personal growth, and support ethical decision-making. By
understanding and embracing their duties, individuals contribute to the well-being of society and their
own development, reinforcing the foundational principles of a just and functional community.

Q.7 a)- Forms of citizenship

ANS.- Citizenship is a legal status that denotes membership in a political community, typically a nation-state,
and confers a set of rights and responsibilities. The forms of citizenship can be categorized into several types
based on how it is acquired or the nature of the rights it provides:
1. Birthright Citizenship: This form of citizenship is granted automatically to individuals born within
the territory of a country, regardless of their parents' nationality. Known as "jus soli" (right of the
soil), it is prevalent in countries like the United States and Canada. For example, a child born in
these countries is a citizen even if their parents are non-citizens.
2. Citizenship by Descent: Also known as "jus sanguinis" (right of blood), this form is based on the
nationality or ethnicity of one or both parents. Individuals may acquire citizenship through their
parents' nationality, even if they are born outside the country. Many European countries, such as
Germany and Italy, follow this principle, allowing descendants of nationals to claim citizenship.
 9

3. Naturalization: This process allows individuals to become citizens of a country through legal
procedures after meeting specific requirements, such as residing in the country for a certain
period, demonstrating language proficiency, and showing knowledge of the country’s laws and
customs. For instance, immigrants who fulfill these criteria can apply for citizenship in their
adopted countries.
4. Dual or Multiple Citizenship: This form occurs when an individual holds citizenship in more than
one country simultaneously. It can arise from various factors, including birth in a country with
dual citizenship laws, naturalization in a new country while retaining the original citizenship, or
through marriage. Dual citizenship is recognized by many countries but may be subject to specific
regulations and restrictions.
5. Statelessness: While not a form of citizenship per se, statelessness refers to individuals who are
not recognized as citizens by any country. Stateless individuals lack the legal status and rights
associated with citizenship, which can lead to significant challenges in accessing services,
employment, and legal protections.
Each form of citizenship plays a crucial role in shaping an individual's legal status and identity within a
political community. The diversity in citizenship laws reflects the various ways in which nations
accommodate the complexities of identity, belonging, and integration in a globalized world.

b)- Party as Vanguard of the Proletariat (V. I. Lenin)

ANS.- Party as Vanguard of the Proletariat (V. I. Lenin)
In Leninist theory, the concept of the party as the "vanguard of the proletariat" is central to the Marxist
understanding of revolutionary strategy and leadership. According to Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, the party
plays a crucial role in guiding the working class (the proletariat) towards the overthrow of the capitalist
system and the establishment of a socialist state.
Lenin argued that the proletariat, in its struggle against capitalism, cannot achieve revolutionary
consciousness spontaneously. The working class, left to its own devices, may develop only a trade-union
consciousness, focused on immediate economic gains rather than the broader revolutionary goals of
overthrowing capitalism. This limitation arises because the proletariat, being directly engaged in the
capitalist system, might struggle to see beyond its immediate conditions and interests.
To address this, Lenin proposed that the working class needs the guidance of a revolutionary party. This
party, comprised of the most advanced and conscious elements of the working class, is tasked with
developing and propagating a revolutionary ideology and strategy. The party serves as the vanguard,
leading the way by providing political education, organizing strikes, and mobilizing workers for
revolutionary actions. It acts as a cohesive force, uniting disparate elements of the working class and
providing direction for their collective efforts.
Lenin's concept of the vanguard party emphasizes the importance of theoretical clarity and
organizational discipline. The party must not only understand Marxist theory but also apply it effectively
to the conditions of the time. It should have a well-defined program that addresses the immediate and
 10

long-term goals of the revolution. Furthermore, Lenin stressed that the party should maintain a close
relationship with the working class, ensuring that its actions and policies reflect the needs and
aspirations of the proletariat.
In summary, Lenin viewed the party as the crucial leader of the proletariat, necessary for transforming
the working class from a class-in-itself into a class-for-itself. The party’s role is to provide the ideological
and organizational leadership required to bring about a socialist revolution and the eventual
establishment of a classless society. Without such a vanguard party, Lenin believed that the
revolutionary potential of the working class could not be fully realized.