0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Comparison Paper

The paper compares the protagonists Laura and Rosemary from Katherine Mansfield's works, highlighting their differing responses to encounters with lower-class individuals. While Laura develops genuine empathy and awareness of social divides, Rosemary's reactions remain self-serving and superficial. The contrast illustrates the difference between true compassion and performative kindness in the context of privilege and social awareness.

Uploaded by

leila.ashour09
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views3 pages

Comparison Paper

The paper compares the protagonists Laura and Rosemary from Katherine Mansfield's works, highlighting their differing responses to encounters with lower-class individuals. While Laura develops genuine empathy and awareness of social divides, Rosemary's reactions remain self-serving and superficial. The contrast illustrates the difference between true compassion and performative kindness in the context of privilege and social awareness.

Uploaded by

leila.ashour09
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Leila Ashour

Dr. Boulanger
English II C
3 February 2025 Comparison Paper

We often hear that money can't buy happiness, yet it seems to shape how we see the

world and others. In Katherine Mansfield's The Garden Party and A Cup of Tea, the

protagonists, Laura and Rosemary, both meet individuals from a lower class, yet their reactions

to these encounters reveal significant differences in their understanding of social divides. Both

Laura and Rosemary initially approach their encounters with lower-class individuals from a

position of privilege and curiosity, but while Laura’s experience fosters genuine empathy and

understanding of class divisions, Rosemary’s remains a self-serving indulgence, highlighting the

contrast between true compassion and performative kindness.

Laura and Rosemary’s initial curiosity about the lower class comes from a privileged

perspective, shaping how they view those beneath them. Laura sees the workmen setting up for

the garden party as fascinating, even romanticizing their actions: “He bent down, pinched a sprig

of lavender, put his thumb and forefinger to his nose and snuffed up the smell” (Mansfield 64).

She finds charm in their simple movements, almost as if they exist for her amusement, rather

than recognizing their labor. Similarly, Rosemary treats her encounter with Miss Smith as an

exciting opportunity rather than a real act of kindness. She reflects on the moment, thinking,

“People always said that sugar was so nourishing. As for herself she didn’t eat; she smoked and

looked away tactfully so that the other should not be shy” (Mansfield 589). Instead of making

Miss Smith feel comfortable, Rosemary distances herself, keeping her own wealth and status

intact. Both women start from a place of privileged curiosity, but while Laura eventually begins
to recognize the reality of class struggles, Rosemary remains trapped in her self-image as a

benevolent savior.

Mansfield contrasts Laura’s growing emotional awareness with Rosemary’s self-

importance through imagery that reflects their shifting, or unchanging, perspectives. As Laura

watches the beauty of her surroundings, she observes, “The green bushes bowed down as though

they had been visited by archangels” (Mansfield 62). This heavenly imagery suggests that she is

beginning to see the world differently, as if something greater is at play. In contrast, Rosemary

never moves beyond a surface-level view of the world, where wealth defines worth. This is

evident when the shopkeeper flatters her while selling an expensive item: “But the shopman had

already bowed as though keeping it for her was all any human being could ask for” (Mansfield

585). The way he treats her reinforces her sense of importance, making her feel special simply

because she can afford luxury. While Laura’s perception of the world is shifting as she becomes

more aware of inequality, Rosemary stays in a reality where everything revolves around her.

While Laura is deeply affected by her encounter with poverty, Rosemary’s concern

remains shallow, driven by vanity rather than genuine empathy. As she stands on the pavement,

“Of course, the car was there. She’d only to cross the pavement. But still she waited” (Mansfield

586). This moment captures Rosemary's hesitation, not because of the circumstances around her,

but due to her discomfort without the box she wishes she had bought. She wishes for the comfort

of the box she was carrying earlier, something to hold onto and give her security. This feeling of

unease shows that Rosemary is more concerned with her own comfort than with engaging

meaningfully with the reality of her life or the lives of others. She is unwilling to move beyond

her privileged bubble, showing how her focus is on her own needs rather than extending

compassion to others. Her hesitation stands in stark contrast to Laura, whose discomfort with her
privilege is more emotionally genuine. For instance, Laura’s rejection of cream puffs, “Oh,

impossible. Fancy cream puffs so soon after breakfast. The very idea made one shudder”

(Mansfield 73). This reflects her internal conflict as she faces the reality of death in the lower

class. Unlike Rosemary, who waits on the pavement, unable to act beyond her own needs,

Laura’s reaction shows how she’s struggling with the realization of the vast social divide that

separates her from others, specifically the poor family nearby. This highlights the contrast

between performative benevolence, seen in Rosemary, and a true emotional response to social

injustice, as represented by Laura.

You might also like