Binet-Kamat Test of Intelligence Report

Saee Pathak 2437548

2 MPCL-B

Department of Psychology

CHRIST (Deemed to be University), Bangalore

MPS251: Psychodiagnostics Lab-1

Submitted to Dr. Hema

24th February 2025

Intelligence can be defined as an individual’s ability to understand complex ideas,

adapt effectively to their environment, learn from experience, engage in various forms of

reasoning, and overcome obstacles with careful thought (Baron & Misra, 2017). In the Indian

context, the Binet Kamat Test of Intelligence (BKT) is one of the measures used to assess

intelligence. The Binet scale was revised in 1934 to make it more suitable for the Indian

context. The test was subsequently made available in Kannada and Marathi (Roopesh, 2020).

Alfred Binet, credited with developing intelligence quotient (IQ) testing, laid the

foundation for later intelligence assessments like the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test. This

scale was later adapted by Indian psychologist and educator Dr. Kamat, renowned for his

research on improving intelligence and cognitive development in young children.

The BKT test was introduced in 1934, with a sample of school children from

Dharwad in Karnataka. A review was performed thirty years later in 1967, which was

followed by another review thirty-five years later, which led the test to be re-adapted and

revalidated on a limited age range of mainly economically disadvantaged children with Hindi

as their main medium of instruction (Gopalakrishnan & Venkatesan, 2019).

Description of the Test

The BKT measures an individual’s abilities in nine areas: language, conceptual

thinking, verbal and nonverbal reasoning, meaningful memory, nonmeaningful memory,

numerical reasoning, visuomotor coordination, and social intelligence (Rajkumar et al.,

2008).

BKT assesses a person's intelligence, covering 13 age levels ranging from 3 to 22. At

age 3, the child is asked to identify parts of their body, name objects in pictures, repeat words,

and answer simple questions. At age 4, they are asked to repeat numbers, identify shapes,
count coins, and answer questions. For age 5, facial recognition and basic counting skills are

tested, along with naming family members and left/right orientation. At age 6, the child is

asked to repeat a sequence of four digits, describe pictures, and show numbers using their

fingers. At age 7, they are asked to repeat a long syllable, name the days of the week, and

count backwards. Age 8 requires the child to repeat five digits, add up coins, and answer

hypothetical questions. At age 9, basic skills like addition and subtraction, reading, and free

association are tested. At age 10, the child is asked to arrange weights, repeat long sentences,

draw designs from memory, and find rhyming words. At age 12, they are asked to find

absurdities in sentences, define words, interpret stories, and repeat digits in reverse. Age 14

requires the child to unjumble sentences, compare objects, and demonstrate problem-solving

skills. Age 16 is designed for adults, making the test more difficult and complex. They are

asked to interpret stories, reverse clock hands, and explain the differences between a

president and a prime minister. Age 19 is meant for superior adults and requires using codes,

measuring quantities, and engaging in abstract thinking. The final age level, i.e., 22, is

assigned for very superior adults and tests physical relationships, memory, and free word

association.

Overall, the difficulty level of the test increases as the age progresses. The test

measures various areas of cognition, including verbal comprehension, arithmetic, inductive

reasoning, visual-spatial abilities, abstraction capacity, and memory span (Roopesh, 2020).

Psychometric Properties

BKT is a popular tool used in the Indian setting to measure intelligence. The test was

first standardized in 1934. This test has a high-reliability coefficient of over 0.7, which means

it consistently produces accurate results. The validity coefficient of the test is 0.5 for normal

children when compared to the teachers' estimates of the test's intelligence quotient,
indicating that the test is a good measure of intelligence in children (Gopalkrishnan &

Venkatesan, 2019)

In the institutional and hospital context, the test meets the face validity requirement,

meaning that it appears to measure what it intends to measure. The BKT is a standardized test

that has been used for many years in India and is a reliable and valid tool for assessing

intelligence in children (Roopesh, 2020).

Significant research findings

The BKT test was administered to the children from the orphanage to evaluate their

emotional intelligence and IQ. The results indicated a strong correlation between these two

factors, with no apparent gender differences in the scores of either test. Moreover, the sub-

scores and the overall emotional intelligence score are connected with IQ (Kaimal, 2021).

Another research study examines the connection between children's theory of mind

and overall intelligence using the Binet Kamat Intelligence Test. The findings suggest that the

theory of mind is a cognitive ability independent of general intelligence, as demonstrated by

IQ tests like the Binet-Kamat, except for its association with social intelligence and

visuomotor skills (Rajkumar et al., 2008).

Application

Due to the presence of the age criteria, BKT has primarily been used in the

educational and clinical setting. In educational settings, it is used to evaluate people's general

intellectual capacity and compare it to their academic performance (Kamat, 1934). In the

clinical setting, it is used to test the mentally challenged individuals, learning impaired

children with speech and language impairments, slow learners, etc. Additionally, it can be

used to evaluate a person's intellectual capacity and performance in various domains,

including language, reasoning, memory, and social competence (Mahale, 2023).

Name: A.A.

Age: 22 years

Gender: Female

Education: Currently pursuing a Master’s in Clinical Psychology

Referred by: None

Presenting Concerns: N/A

Test Administered: Binet Kamat Test of Intelligence (BKT)

Purpose of Testing: Assessing cognitive functioning for educational purpose.

Behavioural Observations: The participant had a calm, composed, and attentive demeanour

throughout the assessment. They actively listened and were willing to clarify any doubts

during the process. The participant responded promptly to the questions and displayed

enthusiasm and eagerness. They maintained regular eye contact and did not spend too much

time on any question

Test Results

Table 1: Results from Binet Kamat Test

Domains Sub Domains Age

Memory Meaningful 22

Non- Meaningful 22

Conceptual Thinking 19

Reasoning Non-Verbal 22

Verbal 19

Numerical 16

Visio-Motor 19

Social Intelligence 12

Test Interpretation

An IQ score of 95 was obtained, and scores between the range of 90 and 109 were

deemed to be average under the Binet Kamat Test of Intelligence (Roopesh, 2020).

This indicates that the individual falls within most of the population; they have normal

fluctuation in cognitive ability and carry skills required for their ages. Research

conducted by Berg and Sternberg (1992) suggests that intelligence is linked to the ability to

handle novelty, everyday competence, and verbal competence throughout the adult lifespan.

However, IQ testing alone does not fully understand an individual as it needs to

consider behavioural, social, medical, and linguistic background (Christie, 2005).

speaker, was administered the Binet Kamat Intelligence Test till age 16, meant for average

adults. The results were obtained in the following domains: language, memory, reasoning,

conceptual thinking, visual-motor and social intelligence. The participant scored a basal age

of 16, varying ages across all the domains. The participant received a Binet Kamat Test of

Intelligence total IQ score of 95, within the average range (90–109). A participant with an

average IQ is thought to have ordinary cognitive ability for their age group. As observed from

the table, they probably possess sufficient language, memory, reasoning, and visuomotor

coordination capabilities. Furthermore, their social intelligence also falls within the normal

range for their age and educational background. IQ is primarily based on biological and

social factors (Nisbett et al., 2012). IQ scores from preschool to early adulthood tend to be

reasonably stable (Schneider et al., 2014).

Due to the participant scoring within the average IQ range, it can be interpreted that

they meet the domains' requirements and fall within the expected ranges with the majority.

However, IQ tests alone cannot wholly picture a person's intellectual abilities. In order to

have a comprehensive understanding, IQ testing must be combined with an assessment of

behavioural, social, medical, and linguistic backgrounds (Christie, 2005).

Impression and Recommendations

The participant falls under the average range of IQ; if required, a few suggestions to

improve IQ would be practising working memory exercises, which help enhance fluid

intelligence (Au et al., 2014). The following recommendations can also be considered.

Enhancing Cognitive Skills

promote cognitive flexibility, such as problem-solving exercises and logical reasoning tasks.

Language and Verbal Development

Being bilingual in Hindi and English, the participant can benefit from activities that

enhance verbal fluency, comprehension, and articulation. Exposure to advanced vocabulary

through academic literature, media, and professional communication can strengthen language

proficiency.

Memory and Retention Strategies

Techniques such as mnemonic devices, visualization strategies, and active recall

methods can be incorporated to improve memory and retention. Summarization, note-taking,

and concept mapping practice can enhance memory retention and retrieval.

Reasoning and Conceptual Thinking

Engaging in logical reasoning exercises, analytical discussions, and structured

problem-solving tasks can help refine critical thinking and decision-making skills.

Holistic Approach

Since IQ scores alone do not provide a complete understanding of intellectual

potential, it is recommended to consider other factors such as emotional intelligence, social

skills, and behavioural tendencies.

Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2014).

Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(2), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-

0699-x

Berg, C. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1992). Adults’ conceptions of intelligence across the adult

life span. Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-

7974.7.2.221

Christie, D. (2005). Introduction to IQ testing. Psychiatry, 4(6), 22–25.

https://doi.org/10.1383/psyt.4.6.22.66351

Gopalkrishnan, I. K., & Venkatesan, S. (2019). Normative congruence between 1967 and

2002 adaptations of age scale for Indian urban children. International Journal of

Indian Psychology, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.25215/0704.067

Kaimal, G. G. (2021). Intelligence and Emotional Intelligence among Inmates of

Orphanages: A Cross-sectional Study. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC

RESEARCH. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2021/48316.14560

Kamat, V. V. (1934). A REVISION OF THE BINET SCALE FOR INDIAN CHILDREN:

(Kanarese and Marathi speaking). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(3),

296–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1934.tb02959.x

Mahale, A. L. (2023). Correlation of Dental Anxiety Measured by Children Drawing:

Hospital Scale and SEM Scale with the Intelligence Quotient Levels Measured by

Binet Kamat Test among Children Aged 6–9 Years. Journal of Pediatric Dentistry,

16–22. https://doi.org/10.14744/jpd.2023.5_172
Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer,

E. (2012). Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American

Psychologist, 67(2), 130–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026699

Rajkumar, A. P., Yovan, S., Raveendran, A. L., & Russell, P. S. S. (2008). Can only

intelligent children do mind reading: The relationship between intelligence and theory

of mind in 8 to 11 years old. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-51

Roopesh, B. N. (2020). Review article: Binet Kamat Test of Intelligence: Administration,

Scoring and interpretation- An In - depth Appraisal. Indian Journal of Mental

Health(IJMH), 7(3), 180. https://doi.org/10.30877/ijmh.7.3.2020.180-201

Schneider, W., Niklas, F., & Schmiedeler, S. (2014). Intellectual development from early

childhood to early adulthood: The impact of early IQ differences on stability and

change over time. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 156–162.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.02.001