Here's a table of possible Likert scale (5-point) questionnaires for assessing external factors
influencing humanitarian, development, and peace building efforts based on PESTEL analysis.
The scale can be:
1 – Strongly Disagree | 2 – Disagree | 3 – Neutral | 4 – Agree | 5 – Strongly Agree
PESTEL Factor Assessment Statement (5-Point Likert Scale) Purpose/Focus
The political environment in this region is stable Political stability and risk
Political Factors
and supportive of humanitarian efforts. analysis
Government policies positively impact Policy influence on
development and peace building activities. operations
Political interference does not hinder aid
Operational constraints
distribution and peace building initiatives.
Government authorities collaborate effectively Collaboration and
with NGOs on development projects. partnerships
Economic conditions (e.g., inflation, poverty) Economic vulnerability
Economic Factors
significantly influence humanitarian needs. assessment
Sufficient funding opportunities exist for
Resource mobilization
development and peace building projects.
The local economy provides stable livelihood Community resilience and
opportunities for vulnerable populations. development
Economic barriers do not restrict aid delivery or
Operational feasibility
program implementation.
Cultural norms in the region support equitable Inclusivity and cultural
Social Factors
access to humanitarian aid and services. relevance
Social inequalities (e.g., gender, ethnicity) do not
Equity and social barriers
affect access to development programs.
The local community actively participates in
Community engagement
development and peacebuilding efforts.
Social cohesion has improved as a result of Peace building progress
peacebuilding initiatives. assessment
Technological Available technology is sufficient for effective Technological capacity
Factors data collection and aid delivery. assessment
Digital tools are widely accessible for community Digital inclusion and
engagement and feedback. accessibility
Technological limitations do not restrict the
Barriers to innovation
implementation of development projects.
Innovation and technology have enhanced Efficiency improvement
humanitarian response effectiveness. assessment
Environmental Environmental risks (e.g., drought, floods) are
Disaster preparedness
Factors well integrated into response planning.
Climate change considerations are factored into
Sustainability planning
development projects.
Projects are designed to minimize negative Environmental
environmental impact. stewardship
PESTEL Factor Assessment Statement (5-Point Likert Scale) Purpose/Focus
The region's natural resources are used
Resource sustainability
sustainably in development projects.
Legal frameworks support effective
Legal Factors humanitarian, development, and peacebuilding Legal compliance and risk
efforts.
There are no significant legal barriers hindering
Operational feasibility
humanitarian assistance.
Human rights and child protection laws are well Protection standards
integrated into the project framework. compliance
The organization is fully compliant with national Legal compliance and
and international legal requirements. accountability
Survey Template: Assessing Political Impact on NGOs in Humanitarian, Development, and
Peacebuilding Efforts
Instructions: Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following
statements using the scale below:
1 – Strongly Disagree | 2 – Disagree | 3 – Neutral | 4 – Agree | 5 – Strongly Agree
Section A: Political Stability
1. The political environment in the region supports long-term NGO operations. (1 2 3 4 5)
2. Political instability has negatively impacted project timelines and resource access. (1 2 3
4 5)
Section B: Government Collaboration
3. Government authorities actively support and engage with NGO initiatives. (1 2 3 4 5)
4. NGOs can easily establish partnerships with local government bodies. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section C: Policy Environment and Regulations
5. Policies and regulations governing NGO activities are transparent and consistent. (1 2 3 4
5)
6. Policy changes are frequently disruptive to ongoing humanitarian and development work.
(1 2 3 4 5)
Section D: Bureaucratic Efficiency
7. Government agencies provide timely approvals for NGO operations and projects. (1 2 3 4
5)
8. The process of acquiring operational permits is straightforward and timely. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section E: Political Interference and Control
9. NGOs can operate without political interference in decision-making and project design.
(1 2 3 4 5)
10. Political pressures influence the selection of beneficiaries and aid distribution. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section F: Conflict Sensitivity and Risk Management
11. The political environment allows for effective conflict-sensitive programming. (1 2 3 4 5)
12. Political actors have been actively involved in peacebuilding collaborations. (1 2 3 4 5)
Optional Open-Ended Questions:
What are the primary political challenges your organization faces in the region?
How can political actors better support NGO efforts in humanitarian, development, and
peacebuilding work?
Survey Template: Assessing Economic Impact on NGOs in Humanitarian, Development,
and Peacebuilding Efforts
Instructions: Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following
statements using the scale below:
1 – Strongly Disagree | 2 – Disagree | 3 – Neutral | 4 – Agree | 5 – Strongly Agree
Section A: Economic Stability
1. The economic conditions in the region support sustainable NGO operations. (1 2 3 4 5)
2. Economic instability has negatively impacted project funding and sustainability. (1 2 3 4
5)
Section B: Funding Accessibility
3. There are sufficient funding opportunities for NGO projects in the region. (1 2 3 4 5)
4. NGOs have easy access to funding from both local and international sources. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section C: Resource Allocation
5. Available economic resources are efficiently allocated to support NGO activities. (1 2 3 4
5)
6. Resource constraints have limited the scope of NGO operations. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section D: Local Economic Environment
7. The local economy provides stable employment opportunities benefiting community
programs. (1 2 3 4 5)
8. Economic conditions have affected the demand for NGO services in the region. (1 2 3 4
5)
Optional Open-Ended Questions:
What are the primary economic challenges your organization faces in the region?
How can economic conditions be improved to better support NGO efforts?
Thank you for your participation! Your feedback will help assess and improve the
collaboration between economic institutions and NGOs.
Survey Template: Assessing Technological Impact on NGOs in Humanitarian,
Development, and Peacebuilding Efforts
Instructions: Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following
statements using the scale below:
1 – Strongly Disagree | 2 – Disagree | 3 – Neutral | 4 – Agree | 5 – Strongly Agree
Section A: Technological Infrastructure
1. The technological infrastructure in the region supports effective NGO operations. (1 2 3 4
5)
2. Poor infrastructure has limited the effectiveness of NGO projects. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section B: Digital Accessibility
3. Digital tools are widely accessible for NGO staff and beneficiaries. (1 2 3 4 5)
4. Access to digital tools has improved service delivery and data collection. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section C: Innovation and Capacity
5. Technological innovations have enhanced the efficiency of NGO activities. (1 2 3 4 5)
6. There is sufficient training available for NGO staff on using new technologies. (1 2 3 4 5)
Section D: Data Security and Management
7. Data security measures are adequate for protecting sensitive NGO information. (1 2 3 4
5)
8. Effective data management practices are in place to support decision-making. (1 2 3 4 5)
Optional Open-Ended Questions:
What are the primary technological challenges your organization faces in the region?
How can technological tools be better utilized to support NGO efforts?
Thank you for your participation! Your feedback will help assess and improve the
technological capacity and support for NGOs.
