University of Santo Tomas
España Boulevard, Sampaloc, Manila
College of Information and Computing Sciences
Department of Information Technology
ICS2609 APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT (BACK-END)
PEER-EVALUATION FORM
Title: Group No.
Pledge of Integrity
I pledge to uphold the highest standards of credibility and integrity in all evaluations. I will assess myself and my
peers fairly and accurately, ensuring that all judgments are based solely on actual performance and genuine
contributions. I commit to being objective, transparent, and honest in my evaluations to foster a culture of trust and
excellence.
Evaluator’s Signature over Printed Name
Evaluation Rubric
Needs Improvement
Criteria Excellent (4) Good (3) Satisfactory (2) (1)
Consistently Usually participates Sometimes participates Rarely participates in
participates actively in actively in meetings and in meetings and meetings and
all meetings and discussions, providing discussions, providing discussions, seldom
A. Participation discussions, providing helpful input and some input but rarely provides input, or
valuable input and taking initiative in most taking the initiative. takes the initiative.
taking initiative in tasks.
tasks.
Delivers work of Delivers work of good Delivers work of Delivers work of
exceptional quality, quality, meeting acceptable quality, poor quality, failing
exceeding expectations with some meeting fundamental to meet basic
B. Quality of Work expectations in creativity and accuracy. requirements but requirements with
thoroughness, needing more depth significant accuracy.
creativity, and and creativity.
accuracy.
Highly effective in Generally effective in Occasionally Rarely collaborates
collaborating with collaborating with team collaborates with team with team members,
team members, members, usually members, sometimes often unsupportive,
C. Collaboration always supportive, supportive, and supportive, but only and contributes
and contributes to a contributes to a positive sometimes contributes negatively to the
positive team team dynamic. positively. team dynamic.
dynamic.
Communicates ideas Communicates ideas Communicates ideas Communicates ideas
clearly and clearly and effectively adequately but poorly, often leading
effectively, both most of the time, occasionally needs to
verbally and in ensuring most team more clarity, leading to misunderstandings
D. Communication
writing, ensuring all members are some and lack of clarity
team members are well-informed. misunderstandings within the team.
well-informed. among team members.
Page 1 of 2 Signature
Always takes Usually takes Sometimes takes Rarely takes
responsibility for responsibility for responsibility for responsibility for
assigned tasks, meets assigned tasks, meets assigned tasks, assigned tasks,
E. Responsibility & deadlines consistently, deadlines most of the occasionally misses frequently misses
Reliability and can be relied upon time, and is generally deadlines, and can be deadlines, and is
by team members. reliable. somewhat unreliable. often unreliable.
Proactively identifies Often identifies Occasionally identifies Rarely identifies
problems and problems and suggests problems and suggests problems or suggests
suggests practical solutions, showing solutions but often solutions, showing
F. Problem-Solving
solutions, initiative and critical needs prompting and little initiative and
& Initiative
demonstrating high thinking most of the guidance. critical thinking.
initiative and critical time.
thinking.
Evaluation:
Name (LN, FN M.) A B C D E F Total
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Comments:
No. Comment
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Evaluation Process
1. Rating: The team leader rates his/her peers on a scale of 1 to 4 for each criterion, with 4 being the highest.
2. Comments: The team leader shall provide specific examples or feedback for each rating to contextualize their
evaluations.
3. Total Scores: The scores for each criterion are combined to get a final score for each team member.
*** Nothing Follows ***
Page 2 of 2 Signature
