0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views13 pages

Appointment of Arbitrator

The document is an arbitration petition filed by M/s. Zenith Infratech against M/s. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. for the appointment of an arbitrator due to a payment dispute of Rs. 13,24,422. The petitioner claims that the respondent has failed to pay for services rendered under a work order and seeks resolution through arbitration as stipulated in their agreement. The petition requests the High Court of Bombay to appoint a sole arbitrator and grant any further orders deemed appropriate.

Uploaded by

Nizzica Pinto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
62 views13 pages

Appointment of Arbitrator

The document is an arbitration petition filed by M/s. Zenith Infratech against M/s. Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. for the appointment of an arbitrator due to a payment dispute of Rs. 13,24,422. The petitioner claims that the respondent has failed to pay for services rendered under a work order and seeks resolution through arbitration as stipulated in their agreement. The petition requests the High Court of Bombay to appoint a sole arbitrator and grant any further orders deemed appropriate.

Uploaded by

Nizzica Pinto
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 249 OF 2020

IN

ARBITRATION PETITION NO. OF 2025

In the matter of Sections


11(6),

of Arbitration And
Conciliation

Act, 1996

M/s. Zenith Infratech )

having office at C/o Hoosaini Auto Mart, )

G1, Hoosaini Plaza, 24, S. V. Road, )

Bhardawadi Junction, Andheri (W), )

Mumbai - 400058

)…Applicant/Petitioner

Versus

M/s Simplex Infrastructures Ltd., )

Having registered office at Simplex House, 27, )

Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata, )

West Bengal - 700017. )…Respondent

TO, THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND OTHER


PUISNE JUDGES OF THE HIGH COURTOF BOMBAY

THE HUMBLE PETITION OF THE


APPLICANT/PETITIONER
ABOVEMANED:

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHWETH:

1. The present Petition is filed by the Applicant/Petitioner

under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act“) for

the Appointment of an Arbitrator in terms of Clause 12

and of Quotation bearing Ref. No.AL/Q/17-18 dated 5 th

June, 2017 and the said Work Order bearing Clause No.

17. Both the above mentioned clauses are reproduced

hereinafter:

“Clause 12 Any dispute in relation to this Agreement

will be subject to arbitration in Mumbai Jurisdiction.

Clause 17 In the event of any difference or dispute

arising out of or in connection with this Work Order, the

same shall be first amicably settled by mutual dialogue.

If the parties fail to settle their difference or dispute

arising out of or in connection with this work order


(including interpretation of the terms thereof), the

same shall be referred to Arbitration. The Arbitration

proceedings shall be conducted by a single Arbitrator

appointed by the Company Secretary of Simplex

Infrastructures Ltd., and the award/decision of such

arbitrator shall be final and binding upon both the

parties. The venue of the arbitration shall be Kolkata.

However, the work shall not be stopped during the

pendency of the proceedings and it shall be ensured

that such work is proceeded uninterruptedly.”

2. The Respondent viz., M/s Simplex Infrastructures Ltd.,

was in need for 1 number of P & H 335 Crawler Crane

for the Respondent’s work site at Chennai and

therefore, approached the Applicant/Petitioner and

requested to provide Quotation to the Respondent. That

pursuant to request made by the Respondent, the

Applicant/Petitioner provided its Quotation bearing Ref.

No.AL/Q/ 17—18 dated 5th June 2017 the Respondent

vide email dated 5th June, 2017. Hereto annexed and

marked as EXHIBIT – ‘A’ is the copy of the Quotation

bearing Ref. No.AL/Q/ 17—18 dated 5th June 2017 and

EXHIBIT – ‘B’ is the copy of the Email dated 5 th June,


2017 addressed by the Applicant/Petitioner to the

Respondent

3. That upon discussions, deliberations and negotiations

by and between you the addresses and my client, you

the addressee was initially pleased to issue Letter of

Intent bearing Ref. No.011/BHELBP/ZENITH/LOI/Vol. -

1/20010 dated 09.06.2017 and Work Order bearing Ref.

No. No‘011/BHEL/TPS/PRW/WOC/OO1/VOL

02/1001150 dated 28.06.2017 (hereinafter referred to

as “the said Work Order) in favor of the

Applicant/Petitioner for Supply of 1 Number P & H 335

Crawler Crane at Chennai Site. The said Work Order

contains various terms and conditions which are set out

therein. It is pertinent to mention here that initially the

said Work Order was for the period 01.07.2017 to

31.12.2017 and thereafter work was extended by the

Respondent from time to time without issuing further

extended Work Order. It is further pertinent to mention

here that the Applicant/Petitioner continuously followed

up with the Respondent for extension of Work Order.

That upon the receipt of the aforesaid Work Order, the


Applicant/Petitioner mobilized 1 Number of P & H 335

Crawler Crane at the abovesaid work site.

4. That Applicant/Petitioner has thereafter successfully

executed and completed the work under the aforesaid

Work Order. Further, the Respondent has never ever

raised any dispute/protest or demur with the work

executed and completed by the Applicant/Petitioner and

also the Invoices raised by the Applicant/Petitioner

upon the Respondent.

5. That the Applicant/Petitioner has from time to time

raised its Bill/Invoices on the Respondent for the work

executed and completed by the Applicant/Petitioner and

the Respondent have made payments on account to the

Applicant/Petitioner against Bills/Invoices starting from

June 2017 till June 2019. The details of the

Bills/Invoices raised by my client on you the addressee

are as under:

Sr. Bill (No. and Date) Amount (In


No. Rs.)
1. ZI/SIL/05/17-18 dated Rs.1,80,000/-
27.06.2017
2. ZI/SIL/10/17-18 dated Rs.1,06,200/-
01.09.2017
3. ZI/SIL/11/17-18 dated Rs.1,39,703/-
01.09.2017
4. ZI/SIL/12/17-18 dated Rs.81,691/-
01.10.2017
5. ZI/SIL/16/17-18 dated Rs.1,06,200/-
01.11.2017
6. ZI/SIL/20/17-18 dated Rs.63,720/-
01.12.2017
7. ZI/SIL/22/17-18 dated Rs.1,50,736/-
01.01.2018
8. ZI/SIL/24/17-18 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
01.02.2018
9. ZI/SIL/26/17-18 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
01.03.2018
10. ZI/SIL/27/17-18 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
31.03.2018
11. ZI/SIL/01/18-19 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
30.04.2018
12. ZI/SIL/05/18-19 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
31.05.2018
13. ZI/SIL/09/18-19 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
30.06.2018
14. ZI/SIL/10/18-19 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
31.07.2018
15. ZI/SIL/13/18-19 dated Rs.2,08,974/-
31.08.2018
16. ZI/SIL/14/18-19 dated Rs.1,95,408/-
30.09.2018
17. ZI/SIL/19/18-19 dated Rs.2,08,315/-
31.10.2018
18. ZI/SIL/2/18-19 dated Rs.2,04,231/-
30.11.2018
19. ZI/SIL/26/18-19 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
31.12.2018
20. ZI/SIL/29/18-19 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
31.01.2019
21. ZI/SIL/33/18-19 dated Rs.2,10,018/-
28.02.2019
22. ZI/SIL/36/18-19 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
31.03.2019
23. ZI/SIL/02/19-20 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
30.04.2019
24. ZI/SIL/06/19-20 dated Rs.2,12,400/-
31.05.2019
25. ZI/SIL/09/19-20 dated Rs.57,185/-
30.06.2019
Total Rs.44,61,181/-

Hereto annexed and marked as EXHIBIT – ‘C’ is the

copy of the Invoices referred as above.

6. That the Respondent vide email dated 24th May, 2019

informed the Applicant/Petitioner that Crawler Crane

would be de-hired with effect from 08 th June, 2019.

Hereto annexed and marked as EXHINIT – ‘D’ is the


copy of Email dated 24th May, 2019 addressed by the

Respondent to the Applicant/Petitioner.

7. That the Respondent has made on account payment of

Rs.31,36,759/- (Rupees Thirty One Lakhs Thirty Six

Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Nine Only) out of the

total amount of Rs.44,61,181/- (Rupees Forty Four

Lakhs Sixty One Thousand One Hundred Eighty One

Only) leaving a sum of Rs.13,24,422/- (Rupees Thirteen

Lakhs Twenty Four Thousand Four Hundred and

Twenty Two Only) due, owing and payable by the

Respondent. That the Applicant/Petitioner has

persistently requested and reminded the Respondent

via, emails to make payment of outstanding dues

aggregating to a sum of Rs.13,24,422/- (Rupees

Thirteen Lakhs Twenty Four Thousand Four Hundred

and Twenty Two Only) which is admittedly due, owing

and payable by the Respondent to the

Applicant/Petitioner. It is pertinent to mention here that

the Respondent vide email dated 27th April, 2022

admitted that the Respondent owe the

Applicant/Petitioner a sum of Rs.13,24,422/- (Rupees

Thirteen Lakhs Twenty Four Thousand Four Hundred


and Twenty Two Only). Hereto annexed and marked as

EXHIBIT – ‘E’ is the copy of the Email dated 27 th April,

2022 addressed by the Respondent to the

Applicant/Petitioner.

8. That the Applicant/Petitioner had address various

emails to the Respondent, however, the Respondent

have utterly failed and/or neglected to make the

Payment of Rs, 13,24,422/- (Rupees Thirteen Lakhs

Twenty Four Thousand Four Hundred and Twenty Two

Only) which is due, owing and payable by the

Respondent to the Applicant/Petitioner.

9. On account of failure/neglect/refusal by the Respondent

to pay outstanding dues to the Applicant/Petitioner,

there is clearly a dispute arisen by and between the

Respondent and the Applicant/Petitioner in terms of

Clause No.12 of Quotation bearing Ref. No.AL/Q/17-18

dated 5th June, 2017 and the said Work Order bearing

Clause No. 17. Both the above mentioned clauses are

reproduced hereinafter:

“Clause 12 Any dispute in relation to this Agreement

will be subject to arbitration in Mumbai Jurisdiction.


Clause 17 In the event of any difference or dispute

arising out of or in connection with this Work Order, the

same shall be first amicably settled by mutual dialogue.

If the parties fail to settle their difference or dispute

arising out of or in connection with this work order

(including interpretation of the terms thereof), the

same shall be referred to Arbitration. The Arbitration

proceedings shall be conducted by a single Arbitrator

appointed by the Company Secretary of Simplex

Infrastructures Ltd., and the award/decision of such

arbitrator shall be final and binding upon both the

parties. The venue of the arbitration shall be Kolkata.

However, the work shall not be stopped during the

pendency of the proceedings and it shall be ensured

that such work is proceeded uninterruptedly.”

Hereto annexed and marked as EXHIBIT – ‘F’ is the

copy of the Quotation bearing Ref. No.AL/Q/17-18 dated

5th June, 2017 Legal Notice dated 11th July, 2024 sent by

the Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner to the

Respondent.
10. However, the Respondent has failed to reply to the

notice send to the Respondent by the

Applicant/Petitioner.

11. Hence, it is prayed on behalf of the Claimant/

Applicant/

Petitioner that:

(a) To allow the present Application and pass an Order

thereby appointing Sole Arbitrator _____________;

(b)To pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon’ble

Court may deem fit and proper in the given facts and

circumstances of the case in the interest of justice.

12. That the present Application is bonafide and in the

interests of

justice.

13. That irreparable loss and injury would be caused to the

Applicant/Petitioner in case the relief prayed for is not

granted.

For this Act of kindness, the Applicant/Petitioner shall always

remain duty bound for ever.

Dated this day of , 202t at Mumbai


Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner

Applicant/Petitioner

Verification

I, M/s. Zenith Infratech having office at C/o Hoosaini Auto

Mart, G1, Hoosaini Plaza, 24, S. V. Road, Bhardawadi

Junction, Andheri (W), Mumbai - 400058, the Petitioner

herein, do hereby verify that the contents of the above

application are true to the best of my knowledge and belief,

and nothing material has been concealed.

Verified and Affirmed at Mumbai

On this day of , 2025.


Deponent
Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner

You might also like