Group Debate on Transportation Policy: Citizen vs.
Government Planner
1. Introduction
Transportation policies shape how people move, how cities grow, and how
economies develop. This debate will involve two opposing perspectives:
citizens and government planners, each defending their stance on key
transportation issues.
Objective:
To critically discuss transportation policies, understand different viewpoints,
and develop solutions for sustainable urban mobility.
Roles:
Citizen Representatives: Prioritize affordability, convenience, and daily
commuting challenges.
Government Planners: Focus on sustainability, economic feasibility, and long-
term urban development.
2. Debate Topics & Key Arguments
Topic 2: Road Expansion vs. Public Transit Investment
Government Planner: Supports developing metro, bus rapid transit (BRT),
and cycling infrastructure to reduce reliance on cars.
Citizen: Prefers road expansion and flyovers to reduce current traffic
congestion for car owners.
Topic 3: Congestion Pricing in City Center
Government Planner: Proposes congestion pricing (charging fees for cars
entering the city center) to reduce traffic and encourage public transport
use.
Citizen: Opposes extra fees, arguing it is unfair for those who rely on
personal vehicles.
Topic 4: Fuel Subsidies vs. Electric Vehicle (EV) Incentives
Government Planner: Supports reducing fuel subsidies and investing in EV
infrastructure to encourage sustainable transportation.
Citizen: Demands continued fuel subsidies to keep transport costs affordable
for low-income groups.