GD&T 2
GD&T 2
DIMENSIONING AND
TOLERANCING
WORKBOOK AND ANSWERBOOK
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
A Series of Textbooks and Reference Books
Editor
L. L. Faulkner
Columbus Division, Battelle Memorial Institute
and Department of Mechanical Engineering
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio
Mechanical Design Failure Analysis: With Failure Analysis System Software for the
IBM PC, David G. Ullman
Boca Raton London New York
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and
information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and
publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission
to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any
future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic,
mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://www.copyright.com/) or contact
the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides
licenses and registration for a variety of users. For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment
has been arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation
without intent to infringe.
Visit the Taylor & Francis Web site at
http://www.taylorandfrancis.com
and the CRC Press Web site at
http://www.crcpress.com
Preface
Knowledge dissipates without reinforcement. People learn best and most by doing. Only by
doing can one really experience difficulties and exercise one's knowledge. Only by solving
problems can a person reason in concert with the knowledge that has been gained to give the
knowledge its true worth-and believe in its power. A good teacher has to know when to get out
of the way and allow students to add their own experience and abilities to enhance and progress
the information they have put forth.
The worksheets in this book span a wide range of products and industries. They
approach the task of reinforcement of knowledge and its expansion to realistic uses in many
ways. All communicate thoughts better than narrative alone could convey.
There is no substitute for experience. By working through these problems, students will
be immersed in a wide variety of geometries serving many different functions. They will realize
their commonalities and learn to alter their methodology as the function dictates.
I believe that anyone solving and studying all the problems contained herein will
subsequently be able to solve any geometric definition problems faced in any industry.
Good luck.
I would like to thank the people who worked long and hard on this project to bring it to
fruition: Jeannie Winchell ofInstitute for Engineering & Design, Inc., Michael Gay of Nashville
CAD, Patty Hastie ofFord Motor Company and Kay DuVall.
James D. Meadows
iii
Contents
Preface iii
Workbook
Workbook Chapter 1: Introduction 1-1
Workbook Chapter 2: Maximum Material Condition, Least Material
Condition, and Regardless of Feature Size 2-1
Workbook Chapter 4: Size Controls Form 4-1
Workbook Chapter 5: Rules, Concepts, Characteristics and Untoleranced
Dimensions 5-1
Workbook Chapter 6: Datums 6-1
Workbook Chapter 7: The Maximum Material Condition Symbol and Its
Ramifications 7-1
Workbook Chapter 8: Relationships Between Individual Features 8-1
Workbook Chapter 9: Virtual Condition and Resultant Condition Boundaries 9-1
Workbook Chapter 10: Datum Feature of Size Representation 10-1
Workbook Chapter 11: Form Controls 11-1
Workbook Chapter 12: Orientation Controls 12-1
Workbook Chapter 13: Profile 13-1
Workbook Chapter 14: Runout 14-1
Workbook Chapter 15: Location 15-1
Workbook Chapter 16: A Logical Approach to Part Tolerancing 16-1
Workbook Chapter 17: Dimensioning and Tolerancing Schemes 17-1
Workbook Chapter 18: Steps for the Development of a Dimensional
Inspection Plan 18-1
Workbook Chapter 19: Paper Gaging 19-1
Workbook Chapter 20: Functional Gaging 20-1
Workbook Appendix A-I
Answerbook
Answerbook Chapter 1: Introduction 1-1
Answerbook Chapter 2: Maximum Material Condition, Least Material
Condition, and Regardless of Feature Size 2-1
Answerbook Chapter 4: Size Controls Form 4-1
Answerbook Chapter 5: Rules, Concepts, Characteristics and Untoleranced
Dimensions 5-1
Answerbook Chapter 6: Datums 6-1
Answerbook Chapter 7: The Maximum Material Condition Symbol and Its
Ramifications 7-1
Answerbook Chapter 8: Relationships Between Individual Features 8-1
Answerbook Chapter 9: Virtual Condition and Resultant Condition Boundaries 9-1
Answerbook Chapter 10: Datum Feature of Size Representation 10-1
Answerbook Chapter 11: Form Controls 11-1
Answerbook Chapter 12: Orientation Controls 12-1
Answerbook Chapter 13: Profile 13-1
Answerbook Chapter 14: Runout 14-1
Answerbook Chapter 15: Location 15-1
Answerbook Chapter 16: A Logical Approach to Part Tolerancing 16-1
Answerbook Chapter 17: Dimensioning and Tolerancing Schemes 17-1
Answerbook Chapter 18: Steps for the Development of a Dimensional
Inspection Plan 18-1
Answerbook Chapter 19: Paper Gaging 19-1
Answerbook Chapter 20: Functional Gaging 20-1
Answerbook Appendix A-I
v
Workbook
Introduction/Chapter I - Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing 1-1
1. Convert this drawing from plus and minus tolerancing to true position tolerancing. The
mating shaft shown below has a size tolerance of 0.220 - .230.
11.500 ± .005
I
2.500 ±.OO5
/
1------
------
Once the part containing the hole is converted, dimension and tolerance the part containing the
shaft using datums, basic dimensions and position tolerance so it is compatible with the first
part. Geometric tolerance may be divided between the parts in any appropriate combination.
I
L
1-2 Introduction/Chapter 1 - Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
3. Features are:
a. real.
b. surfaces.
c. perfect.
d. always measurable for size.
e. sometimes measurable for size.
5. Surfaces are:
a. features.
b. datums.
c. real.
d. perfect.
e. flawed.
f. sometimes chosen to serve as datum features.
17. An interference fit implies the mating features, when produced within size limits,
a. will always encounter material interference.
b. will sometimes encounter material interference.
c. will never encounter material interference.
1-4 Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing
18. Allowance is
a. the difference between the least material conditions of mating features.
b. the difference between the maximum material conditions of mating features.
c. the difference between the shaft MMC and the hole LMC.
d. the difference between the shaft LMC and the hole MMC.
19. In the drawing below, what type of fit would the shaft and hole be classified as?
Fit: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
, ---- t
,
595
575 -
...----
,
574
564
- I-
20. Classify the type of fit for the shaft and hole in the drawing below.
Fit: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
, ----
t
,
595
575
----
- _.615
.596
i
--
21. Classify the shaft and hole (mating features) fit below.
Fit: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
, r----
t
,
595
575
----
- 575
565
i
--
23. Calculate the mean dimension for these pairs' limit dimensions. Also express an equal
bilateral tolerance for each.
Mean Dimension Bilateral Tolerance
a. .750
.740
b. .680 - .720
c. 2.221 - 2.380
d. 1.850
1.792
24. What are the maximum material conditions and the least material conditions of the following?
MMC LMC _ _ __
MMC _ _
LMC _ _
MMC _ _
1.125
1.120 LMC
-----------'~
25. What is the allowance between these mating features?
Fit (Transition,
" Shaft " Hole Allowln~1 Clllrln~e gr IDllrflmn~l)
a . .625 ± .010 .640 ± .003
b. .850 .839
.840 .829
c. .950 ± .005 .950 ± .005
d. 1.885 1.955
1.755 1.900
2-1 Chapter 2 - MMC, LMC and RFS
Calculate the MMC and LMC for the following holes and shafts.
Holes:
1. ~.625 ±.010 <M> _ __
CO---
2. .620 <M> _ __
~ .590 CO - - _
3. ~ .835 ± .005 <M> _ __
CO---
4. ~ .705 <M> - - -
.695 CO---
5. 1.265 <M> - - -
~
1.245 CO - - -
Shafts:
6. .810 (Q)
~
.750 CO
7. ~.710 ±.020 <M>
CO
8. 1.265 <M>
~ 1.245 CO
9. 22.875 <M>
~ 21.885 CO
10. .090 @
-.085 CO
Chapter 4 - Size Controls Form 4-1
4. When checking for maximum material condition violations in a hole with size limits of
0.500 - .510, what size and type of gage would you use?
a. A full form plug gage with a diameter of .500.
b. A full form plug gage with a diameter of .510.
c. A telescoping gage capable of checking size at any two opposing points.
5. What effect on size checks would adding the note "Perfect form at MMC not required" have?
Choosing the Right Tool- Using the list given below, choose the correct tool to inspect the
items required. Additionally, please answer the other questions.
a. Micrometer
h. GO Gage
c. Peripheral Measuring Tape
d. Proper tool not listed (please fill in the proper tool)
6. 0.250 ± .010 AVG. This Is a hole In metal. It is the I.D. of a thin-walled tube.
What is the MMC? _ _ _ What tool may inspect it? _ _ _ _ _ __
What is the LMC? What tool may inspect it? _ _ _ _ _ __
12. 10.000 - 10.100 This forms two sides of a rectangular part. It Is considered an
external feature of size. It Is rigid.
What is the MMC? What tool may inspect it? _ _ _ _ _ __
What is the LMC? What tool may inspect it? _ _ _ _ _ __
Size Controls Form 4-3
SIZE TOLERANCE
13. Using the drawing below, answer the following questions.
a8 drawn:
f
(625 ±O.25
L '---------'
~ 100 ±1 -----I
'25.25
as produced:
'25
as produced:
'24.75
as produced:
RELATED
INDIVIDUAL or RELATED
5. Name three ways to eliminate the requirement for an envelope of perfect fonn at MMC for an
individual feature of size. (HINT: See "Perfect Fonn at MMC" in definitions unit of this
text.)
6. If you do one of the three things stated in Question 5, can you exceed MMC at any cross
sectional check?
7. If you assign an © to the feature of size in the feature control frame, where is the envelope of
perfect fonn?
a. AtMMC.
b. It does not exist.
c. AtLMC.
8. Which material condition symbols (modifiers) provide the most tolerance to draw from when
used?
5-2 Rules, Concepts, Characteristics and Untoleranced Dimensions
10. What material condition symbol provides for the easiest use of receiver or functional gaging?
11. Is it ever possible to use the MMC symbol both for a feature of size and a datum feature of
size in one feature control frame? Circle your answer: Yes No
14. Draw the symbols for the following geometric characteristics and categorize them as form,
orientation, profile, runout or position.
a. Flatness b. Straightness
c. Roundness d. Cylindricity
g. Parallelism h. Perpendicularity
i. Angularity j. Symmetry
k. Position 1. Runout (Circular)
a. ® b. ®
c. 0 d. ®
e. (.250) f. <0
Chapter 6 - Datums 6-1
3. What criteria is used to choose a datum feature when dimensioning and tolerancing?
6. How many high points of contact are required to simulate a primary datum plane from a planar
datum feature? Secondary datum? Tertiary datum?
7. Are three datums always necessary for part orientation? If yes, why? If no, why not?
9. Is a datum feature ever given form control of its own? If not, why is it not necessary? If so,
why it is necessary?
10. How is the order of precedence of datums shown in a feature control frame?
11. Why does the order of precedence of datums make such a difference in feature orientation?
12. a) If a shaft is chosen as a datum feature (RFS), how is the datum feature simulated?
b) If a hole is chosen as a datum feature (RFS), how is the datum feature simulated?
6-2 Datums
13. Of what use is an angular orientation datum in a datum reference frame that includes a
cylindrical datum feature?
14. How many datum planes are derived from a cylindrical datum feature?
16. How are datum features controlled RFS simulated in manufacturing or inspection?
17. At what size or condition are secondary datum features of size that have their own tolerance of
orientation or position simulated?
18. At what size is a primary datum feature of size represented for the features controlled to it?
20. When a pattern of holes is controlled to a datum hole referenced at MMC, as the datum hole
departs from MMC toward LMC, what happens to the controlled hole pattern and how is it
calculated?
22. If more than one datum reference frame is specified for a part, what effect will this have on
manufacturing and inspection?
23. Why would a designer choose to use only a portion of a surface as a datum feature instead of
the entire surface?
25. Draw a part that uses all the different types of datum targets. Then, write a justification for
your choices.
26. If a designer wants to show a datum target as originating from the opposite side of a part than
the view it has been shown in, how may it be done without another view?
27. What kind of contact is required from the datum feature simulation equipment, in a datum
target area, on a non-cylindrical surface?
28. How is the shape and location of a datum target area defined?
29. What does the dimension origin symbol look like and of what use is it?
6-4 Datums
Data Pre-Processing
If the gathered data is considered of sufficiently high quality for purposes of the assessment it
should be left unaltered. Alternatively, if it contains random or systematic errors that, it is judged,
would adversely affect the results of the assessment, the data should be pre-processed. Pre-
processing can be used to remove outliers, to reduce data errors by smoothing, to operate on data
according to the functional requirements of the workpiece under stress, to account for flexing of
the probe support arm and the finite dimensions of the probe, and to make corrections for the
effects of temperature, humidity and vibration.
For example, the presence of dirt on the surface of the workpiece may yield erroneous,
unrepeatable measurements. This pre-processing may be done by software or by manual methods.
Sufficient information should be provided by the workpiece and inspection equipment
manufacturers to allow the inspector to implement valid techniques for pre-processing of
information. In particular, a complete description of data storage should be given.
[Note: This page is included here for information only. It does not relate directly to the
subsequent questions, but is related to the topic of CMM measurement of features.]
Datums 6-5
30. If a CMM uses a ball probe to establish the axis of a cylindrical feature from which to
measure, what, if any, kinds of errors may occur?
31. If the software uses the best fit algorithm, do you see that as possibly causing problems with
verification? If so, what?
b) Do you see these errors as more or less serious than measurements of features taken from
an axis, established by the best fit algorithm from a cylindrical feature?
6-6 Datums
34. If a tapered probe is used in a hole to establish a datum axis from which to measure other
features:
a) What are the possibilities for error for thin parts? ... for thicker parts?
c) Can knowing the manufacturing procedures and capabilities help minimize the deficiencies
in measurement? How?
d) If the deficiencies in measurement are not minimized and are potentially significant, what
use can be made of the data complied?
Datums 6-7
4X f/J .380-.388
6-8 Datums
-1 GillJ i
__ -I-I-L __
I
SURFACE PLATE
36. This set-up is shown to simulate the datum reference frame called out in the feature control
frame that positions the 0.250 ± .010 hole. Establish a datum reference frame on the drawing
that allows the surface plate set-up shown. Use the following steps:
a) Make the surface that seats on the riser block parallel to datum A to within .005. Make
that surface a datum feature.
b) Assign two datum target areas which will seat against the 900 angle plate(s). Show them
as the cross hatched areas.
c) Assign two datum target areas (similar to datum target areas Al and A2) which will create
a centerplane datum for centering the hole and that can be simulated by the angle blocks
shown in the surface plate set-up to create the 600 angle. Assign these datum target areas
an angularity control to the datum formed by the riser block to within .001.
d) Give the 0.250 hole a positional tolerance that will allow it to receive a 0.240 shaft which
is mounted on a mating part that seats in a fashion simulated by the surface plate set-up.
Datums 6-9
• Coaxiality
• Mating Part Design
Assembly
Ir-~24.41 24.0
1 fl25.2-25.6i
I I
I
.. ¢15.05
15.00
II I
I I I
I I
II I
PIN CASTING
37. a) Assign appropriate coaxiality controls to assure these two parts will mate at assembly.
b) Fill in the perpendicularity control.
6-10 Datums
Nuts~ .[Ml0
Notes: 1. Sheet metal thickness
3mm.
2. Bend Radii allowed 1.5mm
maximum.
3. Unless otherwise specified,
all angles are ± 1 degree.
4. Unless otherwise specified,
all dimensions are ± 0.5.
8X 9S10.7-11.0
r
100 ±0.5----1
~
2X 104·
t-----$-_-$----I-$- + -------r-
1
L
100 ±0.5
80
20
~---.----r--
20 Lso ±O.l~
. - - - - 65 ---tl--I
t----- 85 ----tl~
38. Change this plus and minus toleranced part to a geometrically controlled part.
a) Assign all necessary datums.
b) Position the eight clearance holes to mate with the identical mating part's eight holes.
c) Make all appropriate dimensions and angles into basic dimensions and angles.
d) Assign a coplanarity control where appropriate. Use 0.05 as the tolerance.
e) Assign an angularity control where appropriate. Use 0.5 as the tolerance.
f) If the approach you use has a centering datum, assign that datum feature a perpendicularity
control. Use zero at MMC as the tolerance.
[Note: Tolerances and origins of measurement may be changed to fit the tolerancing method
you choose.]
Datums 6-11
[Note regarding Sheet Metal Parts #1 through #16: The following question and
answer pages show sheet metal and flexible parts in isometric views. Due to the nature
of the questions, datum target areas have not been distinguished from controlled
features. Normally, datum targets would be shown by a radial leader line not ending in
an arrowhead. However, on the following problems, so as to not give away too much of
the answers, they have been indicated as though they were features to be controlled,
and the arrowheads have been used. Again, on the answer sheets, the arrowheads
remain only because the author realizes the problem solver cannot easily eliminate the
arrowheads and he wishes the answers to match.]
~ ~
~ ....
~
;::
51
~
."
..
D)
~
~ :t:I:
.30 :1
LOCAl.. W,l1NG SURFACE TO
AIR ~ MODULE BRACKET
2 SURFACES
VIEW IN DlREC'TlON
OF ARROW 'X'
3:
!.
e!.
-
."
D)
::1-
SLOT WIDTH
I \)
REF
SECTION A-A
ENT1RE W-lING SURFM:E
TO FRONT F\.OOR PNl
en
~
CD
=-=
w
20 :to.5 X 40 :to.5
30 :to.5 e>.
I
~
~