Based on the documents provided, here are some suggestions for highlighting the novelty of the
water magnetization system:
- Emphasize that it is an improved version of previous electromagnetic water treatment technologies.
For example: "This study presents an enhanced design for electromagnetic water treatment that
builds upon prior work to optimize performance."
- Note that the prototype device is a new contribution. For example: "A key novelty of this work is
the development and testing of an original prototype device to generate the electromagnetic fields."
- Point out any specific ways the system differs from or improves on past approaches. For example:
"In contrast to previous systems limited to low field strengths, the present device allows variable
control of higher magnetic field intensities."
- Mention unique aspects of the methodology. For example: "This research implements a more
comprehensive assessment of water properties including pH, oxygen, minerals, hardness, chlorides,
TDS, and conductivity."
- Highlight novel findings from the results and analysis. For example: "The study reveals new insights
into the stabilization of pH by electromagnetic treatment not previously reported."
- Emphasize any new applications enabled by the technology. For example: "The scaled-up system
provides capabilities for agricultural and industrial water treatment at volumes not feasible with
prior prototypes."
- Note if the work expands the current scientific understanding. For example: "These findings
significantly advance knowledge on the interactions between electromagnetic fields and water
chemistry."
The key is to explicitly point out what new knowledge, innovations, and contributions are made by
the current study on water magnetization that go beyond previous work in this area. Highlighting
these novel aspects will emphasize the importance and impact of the research.
Here are some suggestions to expand the methodology section and provide more details on Figures
1-7:
Figure 1:
- Provide more specifics on the EMTD design - dimensions, materials, number of coils, winding
pattern, etc.
- Explain the rationale behind the design choices. Why were these particular components selected?
How do they generate the desired electromagnetic field?
Figure 2:
- Clarify what the voltage graph represents - is it the output oscillating voltage from the 555 timer
circuit?
- Explain how adjusting the resistor/capacitor values changes the oscillation frequency.
Figure 3:
- Specify the dimensions of the burette and coils.
- Explain how the water sample flows through the system. Does it recirculate continuously? What
flow rate is used?
Figure 4:
- Provide more details on the laboratory equipment shown - names, models, manufacturers,
purposes, etc.
- Explain the procedures for each analysis step shown.
Figure 5:
- Clarify the preparation of solutions - concentrations, volumes, etc.
- Describe the titration process in more detail.
Figure 6:
- Specify how the chloride solutions are prepared.
- Explain the chemistry behind the color change with chromate indicator.
Figure 7:
- Provide the make and model of the TDS/conductivity meter used.
- Explain how temperature compensation is achieved in the measurements.
- Describe how the data is recorded - computer interface, software, etc.
In general, aim to provide enough details in the methods section so the experiments could be
reproduced. Specify instruments, parameters, experimental configurations, volumes, concentrations,
and procedural steps.
You're right, the results section could be expanded beyond just Figures 8 and 9. Here are some
suggestions for extending the results:
- Provide quantitative data for the water property measurements - specific values for pH, minerals,
TDS, conductivity etc. before and after electromagnetic treatment. This could be presented in tables.
- Show microscope images of water crystal structures before and after treatment. Analyze the
changes in crystal morphology.
- Include images of scale buildup on piping with and without electromagnetic treatment. Quantify the
scale mass or thickness.
- Plot the measured pH over multiple treatment cycles to show the trend and stabilization.
- Present dissolved oxygen concentrations before and after treatments.
- Show scanning electron micrographs of calcium/magnesium precipitates from treated and
untreated water samples. Characterize the differences in particle size and shape.
- Measure bacterial concentrations in water samples before and after varying treatments. Present
antibacterial efficacy.
- Perform metal corrosion tests by immersing coupons in treated and untreated water. Document
differences in corrosion rates.
- Analyze the mineral composition using spectroscopic techniques or elemental analysis. Compare
concentrations.
- Evaluate viscosity of water samples under different treatment conditions.
- Present any pilot-scale testing data from larger-volume trials of the system.
- Include statistical analysis like T-tests, ANOVA, or regression modeling to evaluate the significance
of the treatment effects.
In general, aim to provide multiple tangible outcome measures, quantitative data, visual evidence,
and statistical assessments to demonstrate and characterize the impacts of the electromagnetic
water treatment under different conditions.
You're correct, there seems to be a reference to Table 2 in the results and discussion section, but the
table is not included in the documents provided. Here are some possibilities:
- Table 2 may have been intended to show the water analysis values for parameters like pH, minerals,
TDS, etc. before electromagnetic treatment. This would serve as a baseline for comparison to the
treated water.
- The authors should either add Table 2 into the appropriate section of the results, or remove the
reference if no such table was created.
- If Table 2 contained proprietary data or measurements that cannot be shared in the paper, it should
be noted that the table has been omitted for brevity/confidentiality.
- Alternatively, Table 2 may have been meant for a different version of the paper and inadvertently
retained in this draft. In that case, the stray reference should be removed.
- As another option, Table 2 could be included to present summarized data points from multiple
experimental trials, showing averages and variability.
- If additional water analysis data needs to be added to further demonstrate the treatment effects,
this could be incorporated into a new Table 2.
In summary, the reference to Table 2 without the corresponding table content is likely an editing
oversight. The authors should clarify if it needs to be added, removed, or substituted with a different
table. Proper citations and presentation of data tables are important for a complete, self-contained
paper.
