Relationship Satisfaction
Relationship Satisfaction
MAJOR ARTICLE
CONTACT Matthew E. Jaurequi Matthew.Jaurequi@csulb.edu Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, California State University Long Beach, 1250
Bellflower Blvd. Long Beach, CA 90840-0501, USA.
ß 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
2144 M. E. JAUREQUI ET AL.
security.13 This is particularly relevant and gives sense hap- partners.22 Higher relationship mindfulness is characterized
piness, security and belonging is critical to achieve optimal by lower tendency to cling to future oriented thoughts or
sleep.14 As a result, the current study examined relationship excessive worry about a romantic relationship or partner
satisfaction as linked to sleep problems through an ability to availability.22 This is important to note as a lower tendency
be mindful with a romantic partner and subsequent negative to focus on the past or worry about the future of relation-
emotional symptoms. ships or partners is key to adaptive relationship procesess.21
For instance, research has shown the experience of highly
enjoyable, pleasant and strong romantic relationships
Organizing framework includes higher relationship mindfulness.22 Whereas, the
Central to the present study, is the notion that sleep is essen- experience of miserable, empty and unpleasant romantic
tial to quality of life and health of college students.1,6 Thus, relationships includes lower relationship mindfulness.13,22
sleep in the current study is considered an index of health. The identification of specific adaptive relationship processes
Also, the present study is a body of research on the social such as relationship mindfulness, which can explain how
psychology of close relationships that shows protective rela- relationship satisfaction and sleep problems are linked, is
tionship factors such as higher relationship satisfaction result- particularly important among the college population as this
ing in improved health.15 That said, there is a need to is a developmental period where relationship habits formed
identify and test specific mechanisms that explain this link.16 have life-long health consequences.21
Such an understanding can shed light on how and under Relationship satisfaction may be linked to sleep problems
what conditions romantic relationships benefit health.16,17 through its prior association with, the adaptive relationship
Multiple studies have investigated the link between process, relationship mindfulness. Higher relationship mind-
romantic relationships and health, and commonly found fulness is characterized by a higher tendency to employ a
romantic relationships predict health through adaptive rela- nonjudgmental present focused attention and awareness dur-
tionship processes and subsequent indices of mental health. ing day-to-day interactions with a romantic partner. This is
For instance, a contemporary review of research revealed important to note because research has shown higher non-
higher relationship satisfaction is linked to better health judgmental present focused attention and awareness to be a
through an ability to be attune and attentive to a romantic causal factor for lower sleep problems.8,9,23 For example,
partner and subsequent negative emotions.16 Similarly, higher levels of nonjudgmental present focused awareness
another review of empirical research found adaptive rela- predicted lower levels of sleep problems among college stu-
tionship processes mediate the association from relationship dents across an academic semester.24 It is plausible, therefore,
quality to mental health.17 In sum, research on romantic that relationship mindfulness captures the adaptive relation-
relationships and health reveals, relationship satisfaction pre- ship process that helps to explain how a satisfying romantic
dicts health through adaptive relationship processes and sub- relationship results in lower sleep problems.
sequent mental health. Therefore, the current study tested
the degree to which relationship mindfulness, an adaptive
The role of negative emotional symptoms
relationship process and subsequent lower negative emotion
explained the link between relationship satisfaction and sleep The study of relationship satisfaction, relationship mindful-
problems. ness and sleep problems should consider the role of negative
emotional symptoms—depression, anxiety and stress.
Conceptually, defining characteristics of negative emotional
Relationship satisfaction, relationship mindfulness
symptoms, such as inappropriate excessive guilt, dysphoria,
and sleep
worry, hypervigilance and tension, oppose the relaxation
The degree to which one feels happy, safe and rewarded in a required to achieve optimal sleep.25 This is particularly rele-
romantic relationship is known as relationship satisfaction.18 vant given college students experience high rates of negative
Relationship satisfaction directly relates to lower sleep prob- emotional symptoms.26,27 Furthermore, research has shown
lems as a satisfying romantic relationship provides an inter- negative emotional symptoms to be a causal factor for sleep
personal context characterized by feelings of safety and problems among college students.28,29 Specifically, a longitu-
comfort helping to initiate and maintain sleep. Research has dinal study demonstrated depression and stress positively
shown higher relationship satisfaction predicts lower insom- predicted trouble falling asleep and excessive daytime sleepi-
nia risk, as well as lower problems initiating sleep, maintain- ness among college students.29 Another study found anxiety
ing sleep and higher sleep quality.19,20 That said, a complete positively predicted reports of sleep problems over a four
understanding of how satisfying relationships influence month transition into college.28 Quite simply, negative emo-
health, should include the identification of adaptive relation- tional symptoms play a key role for sleep among col-
ship procesess.21 Such an understanding could help curricu- lege students.
lum or prevention-based programs on sleep, incorporating There is also evidence for a direct link between satisfying
the key mechanisms linking romantic relationships with romantic relationships and negative emotional symptoms.
lower sleep problems. For instance, a large number of studies have demonstrated
Relationship mindfulness is the degree to which persons strong links between romantic relationships and negative
tend to be mindful during interactions with romantic emotional symptoms.17 More than that, research has shown
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH 2145
romantic relationships to more strongly predict negative prevalence of negative emotional symptoms among college
emotional symptoms than vice versa.17 Essentially, a satisfy- students, another known causal factor of sleep problems. In
ing romantic relationship has been demonstrated to reduce addition, studies reviewed illustrated higher relationship sat-
risk for negative emotional symptoms. isfaction directly results in lower negative emotional symp-
That said, relationship satisfaction may be linked to nega- toms. So, relationship satisfaction may also be indirectly
tive emotional symptoms through adaptive relationship linked to sleep problems through negative emotional symp-
processes such as relationship mindfulness. This is because; toms. Yet, relationship satisfaction is also indirectly related
a causal relationship between an increased tendency to be to negative symptoms via its prior association with an ability
mindful within the context of romantic relationships may to be mindful. Therefore, the current study utilized a serial
result in lower negative emotional symptoms. Consistent mediation model to test the direct and indirect associations
with this possibility, an experimental study demonstrated between relationship satisfaction, relationship mindfulness,
higher nonjudgmental present focused attention and aware- negative emotional symptoms and sleep problems.
ness resulted in lower levels of stress following a conflict dis- Informed by prior theory and evidence, the study hypoth-
cussion among couples.30 In addition, a large number of esis was as follows. Higher relationship satisfaction explains
studies have shown a higher tendency to employ present lower tendency to experience sleep disturbances through
focused nonjudgmental attention and awareness predicting how mindful a person tends to be during interactions with
lower negative emotional symptoms.31 Similarly, relationship
their romantic partner and subsequent lower negative emo-
mindfulness was found to be negatively associated with
tional symptoms. Noting the role extraneous variables may
depression and stress among a sample of couples.13
have on the proposed effects, the current study controlled
However, it remains undetermined whether relationship
for attachment orientations and age. Adult attachment ori-
mindfulness indirectly links relationship satisfaction and
entations are well established correlates of sleep disturban-
negative emotional symptoms. Such an understanding could
ces.33 Furthermore, extant research has shown age to play a
elucidate the specific adaptive relationship processes,that
explain how relationship satisfaction relates to lower nega- key role in experience of sleep disturbances.34 So, the pro-
tive emotional symptoms. posed serial mediation model tested the direct and indirect
Research has also shown negative emotional symptoms as associations among the study variables controlling for adult
an important pathway by which an ability to be mindful attachment orientations and age (see Figure 1 for the tested
and sleep problems are related. Again, negative emotional model of serial mediation).
symptoms are considered a primary psychological process
maintaining arousal preventing sleep.25 Higher rates of pre-
sent focused nonjudgmental attention and awareness on the
other hand, increases an ability to accept—rather than avoid
Methods
or cling to—negative thoughts and leads to a reduction in
cognitive arousal impeding sleep.8 In fact, research has Participants and procedure
shown this quality of mind related to lower sleep problems,
The study sample consisted of 242 persons currently in a
first through lower depression and anxiety.10 Similarly,
romantic relationship. The average age of participants was
another study found an ability to be more mindful was
indirectly linked to higher sleep quality through perceived 20.25 years (SD ¼ 1.93). Majority of the participants identi-
stress.32 So, the positive effects of an ability to be mindful fied as White/Caucasian (n ¼ 165, 68%) and cisgender
on sleep appears to work first by reducing the negative emo- females (n ¼ 207, 86%). The remaining participants identi-
tional symptoms predictive of sleep problems. fied as cisgender males (n ¼ 33, 14%), transgender male
(n ¼ 1, 0.4%) and preferred not to answer (n ¼ 1, 0.4%).
Additional racial ethnic identities identified by participants
The present study included Latino/a (n ¼ 39, 16%), Black/African American
As reviewed, research suggests adaptive relationship proc- (n ¼ 27, 11%), Asian American (n ¼ 6, 3%), Native
esses and negative emotions are key pathways linking rela- American or Native Alaskan (n ¼ 1, 0.4%), or preferred not
tionship satisfaction and sleep problems. First, multiple to respond (n ¼ 1, 0.4%). The study sample resemble prior
studies have demonstrated a direct causal relationship research and current statistics that report college students
between relationship satisfaction and sleep problems. tend to be White/Caucasian females followed by males and
Additional research reviewed indicates relationship satisfac- persons who identify as Latino/a or Black.35,36
tion which relates to sleep problems indirectly through The institutional review board approved study recruited
adaptive relationship processes such as relationship mindful- persons from undergraduate courses in a large U.S. south-
ness. Importantly, multiple studies have shown higher non- eastern university who were 18 years or older currently in a
judgmental present focused attention and awareness is a committed romantic relationship. Participants were eligible
causal factor for lower sleep problems. Therefore, it reasons to obtain course credit for their participation based on
relationship mindfulness—a context specific measure of instructor’s discretion. Interested participants provided
these qualities—indirectly links relationship satisfaction and informed consent prior to completing an online survey via
sleep problems. Moreover, research also points to a high Qualtrics, containing self-report measure questionnaires.
2146 M. E. JAUREQUI ET AL.
Figure 1. Estimated path coefficients for the serial mediation model with relationship mindfulness and negative emotional symptoms as mediators of the effect of
relationship satisfaction on sleep problems and age and avoidance as covariates. p<.001, p<.01, p<.05 (two-tailed).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and Cronbach’s alphas for the study variables (N ¼ 241).
Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1. Sleep problems –
2. Relationship satisfaction .29 –
3. Relationship mindfulness .21 .31 –
4. Negative Emotional Symptoms .49 .28 .36 –
5. Anxious attachment .18 .26 .28 .32 –
6. Avoidant attachment .18 .56 .32 .23 .28 –
7. Age in years .13 .13 .05 .09 .06 .00 –
M 2.46 5.04 4.50 1.67 3.92 2.29 20.35
SD 0.79 0.98 0.98 0.50 0.96 1.00 1.94
Cronbach’s alpha .93 .88 .83 .93 .66 .82 .82
p <.05, p <.01 (two-tailed).
each. Example items measuring attachment anxiety include, relationship satisfaction was negatively correlated with nega-
“I need a lot of reassurance that I am loved by my partner” tive emotional symptoms and sleep problems. Relationship
and “I worry that romantic partners won’t care about me as mindfulness was positively correlated with relationship satis-
much as I care about them.” Example items measuring faction and negatively correlated with negative emotional
attachment avoidance include, “I want to get close to my symptoms and sleep problems. Negative emotional symp-
partner, but I keep pulling back” and “I try to avoid getting toms were positively correlated with sleep problems.
too close to my partner.” Participants respond based on
their experiences with romantic partners in general.
Responses range from 1 (definitely like me) to 7 (definitely Tests of direct, simple indirect, and serial mediation
not like me). Higher scores indicate higher levels of attach-
ment anxiety and avoidance. The study measures demon- Study results demonstrated significant direct associations
strated acceptable internal consistencies for attachment among relationship satisfaction, relationship mindfulness,
anxiety and avoidance at a ¼ .66 and a ¼ .75, respectively.40 negative emotional symptoms and sleep disturbances (see
The additional control variable of age was measured on a Figure 1). There was a significant direct and negative associ-
continuous scale by which participants indicated their age ation between relationship satisfaction and sleep disturban-
in years. ces (b ¼ .15, p< .05). There was also a significant direct
and positive association between relationship satisfaction
and relationship mindfulness (b ¼.19, p< .01). In turn,
Statistical analyses there was a significant direct and negative association
The data were analyzed using structural equation modeling between relationship mindfulness and negative emotional
with full information maximum likelihood (FIML) estimation symptoms (b ¼ .28, p< .001). The subsequent direct path
method in Mplus 841 to test the proposed associations among from negative emotional symptoms to sleep disturbances
the study variables. The analytic strategy followed methodo- was also significant (b ¼.44 p< .001). On the other hand,
logical recommendations for testing parallel and serial medi- there was not a significant association between relationship
ation.42–44 That is, evidence of a significant parallel mediated satisfaction and negative emotional symptoms (b ¼ .05, p
association is indicated by the presence of a significant simple ¼ .51) or between relationship mindfulness and sleep distur-
indirect effect through the first mediator relationship mindful- bances (b ¼ .01, p ¼ .82).
ness and a significant simple indirect effect through the second The two simple indirect effects linking relationship satis-
mediator negative emotional symptoms. Estimation of serial faction and sleep disturbance via relationship mindfulness or
mediation models follows the parallel mediator case.42 That is, negative emotional symptoms were not significant (b ¼
serial mediation (ie three-path indirect effect) is indicated by .00, p ¼ .84, 95% BC CI [ 0.02, 0.02]) for the indirect
the presence of (a) significant direct effects between the inde- effect through relationship mindfulness and (b ¼ .02, p ¼
pendent variable (eg relationship satisfaction) and first medi- .51, 95% BC CI [0.08, 0.04]) for the indirect effect through
ator (eg relationship mindfulness), between the first mediator negative emotional support). That is, there was no parallel
and second mediator (eg negative emotional symptoms), and mediation from relationship satisfaction to sleep disturban-
between the second mediator and outcome (eg sleep problems) ces through relationship mindfulness or negative emo-
and (b) a significant serial mediation. Each indirect effect was
tional symptoms.
tested for significance based on 95% biased-corrected bootstrap
The three-path indirect effect linking relationship satisfac-
confidence interval (BC CI) calculated on the basis of 5,000
tion and sleep disturbance via the two serially connected
bootstrap samples.
mediators relationship mindfulness and negative emotional
symptoms was significant (b ¼ .02, p< .05, 95% BC CI
Results [-.05, .01]). This finding supported the main study hypoth-
esis on relationship mindfulness and negative emotional
Preliminary analyses
symptoms serially mediating relationship satisfaction and
All study variables were significantly correlated and in the sleep disturbances (see Table 2). The predictors and media-
hypothesized directions (see Table 1). For example, tors accounted for 26% of the variance in sleep disturbances
2148 M. E. JAUREQUI ET AL.
Table 2. Standardized estimates and 95% confidence intervals for pathways in overall negative affectivity best explains how anxiety, depres-
the serial mediation model (N ¼ 241).
sion and stress relate to sleep among college students.50
Effect B SE 95% BC CI
Thus, the treatment of sleep problems among college stu-
Indirect effect
RSAT ! RM ! SP .00 .01 [.02, .02]
dents should consider the role of a complex set negative
RSAT ! NEM ! SP .02 .03 [.08, .04] emotional symptoms.
RSAT ! RM ! NEM .05 .02 [.10, .01] The current study’s findings add to an understanding on
RSAT ! RM ! NEM ! SP .02 .01 [.05, .01]
Total effect
how a satisfying relationship relates to lower negative emo-
RSAT ! SP .20 .07 [.33, .06] tional symptoms. First, present findings demonstrated no
Note: b, standardized estimates; SE, standard error; BC CI, bias-corrected confi- direct association between relationship satisfaction and nega-
dence interval; RSAT, relationship satisfaction; RM, relationship mindfulness; tive emotional symptoms, but an indirect effect through
NEM, negative emotional symptoms; SP, sleep problems. Estimates provided
include having controlled for age and attachment orientations. relationship mindfulness. This finding is in line with prior
literature reviewed that identified relationship satisfaction as
and 17% and 20% of the variance in relationship mindful- a negative predictor of negative emotional symptoms.17
ness and negative emotional symptoms, respectively. Specifically, our findings replicate research on adaptive rela-
tionship processes as mediating relationship quality and
mental health.17 In that, relationship mindfulness mediated
Comment the link from relationship satisfaction to negative emotional
symptoms. This finding extends prior research on a present
The current study investigated factors explaining sleep prob-
focused nonjudgmental attention and awareness as explain-
lems among college students within the context of a roman-
ing the link from a satisfying relationship to lower negative
tic relationship. Results from the study identified lower
emotional symptoms. For example, one study found a col-
relationship satisfaction and higher negative emotional
lege student’s tendency to be nonjudgmental of present
symptoms directly related to more sleep problems. Results
also supported the study’s main hypothesis on relationship moment experiences accounted for levels of depression, anx-
satisfaction as related to sleep problems via its prior associ- iety and stress above and beyond perceived social support.27
ation with relationship mindfulness and subsequent negative In another study, a college student’s tendency to focus on
emotional symptoms. the present rather than ruminating on the past or worrying
As expected, higher relationship satisfaction directly about the future mediated social support and psychological
related to fewer sleep problems. Being in a highly satisfying distress.51 Taken together, it seems feelings of warmth and
romantic relationship provides a context that influences an comfort provided by a relationship relates to lower negative
overall sense of wellbeing.45 Persons in a highly satisfying emotional symptoms, first through the degree to which one
romantic relationship view their partner as responsive to tends to employ a present focused nonjudgmental attention
their needs and validating of their experiences. As a result, a and awareness.
highly satisfying romantic relationship provides emotional The present study found engaging with a romantic part-
warmth, comfort and safety. Such qualities are strikingly ner with present focused nonjudgmental attention and
relevant to sleep and sleep is a vulnerable physiological state awareness explained how higher satisfying romantic relation-
that requires one to feel safe and secure. In fact, a number ships related to lower negative emotional symptoms and
of studies have shown being in a satisfying romantic rela- subsequent fewer sleep problems. Cognitive models of sleep
tionship relates to lower psycho-physiological responses to propose higher rates of sleep problems stem from a ten-
stress, which promotes sleep.45,46 This is particularly import- dency to cling to negative thoughts and emotions exces-
ant for college students as this population experiences a host sively.25,52 This idea was replicated in the present study with
of interpersonal stressors ranging from loss of friends, family the direct and positive association between negative emo-
and having to navigate new social environments. Given the tional symptoms and sleep problems. That said, a key to sat-
numerous interpersonal stressors college students experi- isfying romantic relationships is the ability for couples to
ence, romantic relationships become a primary means for resolve—rather than cling to or avoid—negative thoughts
emotional support.47 Thus, the current and past studies sup- and emotions. Important then is the idea that relationship
port satisfying romantic relationships as an important con- mindfulness is characterized by attention, awareness and
text directly linked to sleep. intention when discussing an issue or working on a problem
Findings also supported prior research on a direct associ- with a romantic partner. In that way, romantic partners who
ation between negative emotional symptoms and sleep prob- practice relationship mindfulness also report lower levels of
lems for college students. In the current study, negative stress and depression.13 Extending this understanding, in
emotional symptoms were characterized by higher aggregate our sample, relationship mindfulness appeared to provide a
reports of depression, anxiety and stress. A review of empir- pathway for satisfying romantic relationships to relate to
ical studies demonstrated depression, anxiety and stress lower negative emotional symptoms and in turn fewer sleep
uniquely predict sleep problems.48 That said, research has problems. Thus, relationship mindfulness may be an import-
also shown depression, anxiety and stress share core symp- ant adaptive relationship process with the potential to help
toms.49,50 Moreover, research has shown college students college students who place great emphasis on romantic rela-
experience a complex mix of negative emotional symp- tionships and are at risk for negative emotional symptoms
toms.50 In fact, research has shown individual differences in and sleep problems.
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH 2149
References 19. Troxel WM, Buysse DJ, Hall M, Matthews KA. Marital happi-
ness and sleep disturbances in a multi-ethnic sample of middle-
1. Williams AB, Dzierzewski JM, Griffin SC, Lind MJ, Dick D, aged women. Behav Sleep Med. 2009;7(1):2–19. doi:10.1080/
Rybarczyk BD. Insomnia disorder and behaviorally induced 15402000802577736.
insufficient sleep syndrome: prevalence and relationship to 20. Troxel WM, Braithwaite SR, Sandberg JG, Holt-Lunstad J. Does
depression in college students. Behav Sleep Med. 2020;18(2): improving marital quality improve sleep? Results from a marital
275–286. doi:10.1080/15402002.2019.1578772 therapy trial. Behav Sleep Med. 2017;15(4):330–343. doi:10.1080/
2. Montagni I, Qchiqach S, Pereira E, Tully P, Tzourio C. Sex-specific 15402002.2015.1133420.
associations between sleep and mental health in university students: a 21. Fincham FD, Beach SR. Of memes and marriage: toward a posi-
large cross-sectional study. J Am Coll Health. 2020;68(3):278–285. tive relationship science. J Fam Theory Rev. 2010;2(1):4–24. doi:
doi:10.1080/07448481.2018.1546183 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00033.x
3. Jiang XL, Zheng XY, Yang J, et al. A systematic review of studies 22. Kimmes JG, Jaurequi ME, May RW, Srivastava S, Fincham FD.
on the prevalence of insomnia in university students. Public Mindfulness in the context of romantic relationships: initial devel-
Health. 2015;129(12):1579–1584. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.07.030. opment and validation of the relationship mindfulness measure. J
4. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Marital Fam Ther. 2018;44(4):575–589. doi:10.1111/jmft.12296.
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: 23. Sala M, Rochefort C, Lui PP, Baldwin AS. Trait mindfulness and
Author. health behaviours: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2019;7:
5. World Health Organization. 2018. International Statistical 1–49. doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1650290.
Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. 11th rev., 24. Caldwell K, Emery L, Harrison M, Greeson J. Changes in mind-
ICD-11. Geneva: Author. fulness, well-being, and sleep quality in college students through
6. Friedrich A, Schlarb AA. Let’s talk about sleep: a systematic taijiquan courses: a cohort control study. J Altern Complement
review of psychological interventions to improve sleep in college Med. 2011;17(10):931–938. doi:10.1089/acm.2010.0645.
students. J Sleep Res. 2018;27(1):4–22. doi:10.1111/jsr.12568#. 25. Harvey AG. A cognitive model of insomnia. Behav Res Ther.
7. United States Census Bureau. Education attainment: American 2002;40(8):869–893. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00061-4
community survey, 2018. ACS 1-year estimates subject table, 26. Downs A, Boucher LA, Campbell DG, Polyakov A. Using the
Table S1501. Available at https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q= WHO–5 well-being index to identify college students at risk for
S1501&tid=ACSST1Y2018.S1501. Accessed July 13, 2020. mental health problems. J Coll Stud Dev. 2017;58(1):113–117.
8. Garland SN, Zhou ES, Gonzalez BD, Rodriguez N. The quest for doi:10.1353/csd.2017.0008
mindful sleep: a critical synthesis of the impact of mindfulness- 27. Kingery JN, Bodenlos JS, Lathrop JA. Facets of dispositional
based interventions for insomnia. Curr Sleep Med Rep. 2016;2(3): mindfulness versus sources of social support predicting college
142–151. doi:10.1007/s40675-016-0050-3. students’ psychological adjustment. J Am Coll Health. 2020;68(4):
9. Shallcross AJ, Visvanathan PD, Sperber SH, Duberstein ZT. 403–410. doi:10.1080/07448481.2019.1574801.
Waking up to the problem of sleep: can mindfulness help? A 28. Doane LD, Gress-Smith JL, Breitenstein RS. Multi-method
review of theory and evidence for the effects of mindfulness for assessments of sleep over the transition to college and the associ-
sleep. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019;28:37–41. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018. ations with depression and anxiety symptoms. J Youth Adolesc.
10.005. 2015;44(2):389–404. doi:10.1007/s10964-014-0150-7.
10. Bogusch LM, Fekete EM, Skinta MD. Anxiety and depressive 29. Wallace DD, Boynton MH, Lytle LA. Multilevel analysis explor-
symptoms as mediators of trait mindfulness and sleep quality in ing the links between stress, depression, and sleep problems
emerging adults. Mindfulness. 2016;7(4):962–970. doi:10.1007/ among two-year college students. J Am Coll Health. 2017;65(3):
s12671-016-0535-7 187–196. doi:10.1080/07448481.2016.1269111.
11. Kan ML, Cares AC. 2006. From “friends with benefits” to “going 30. Barnes S, Brown KW, Krusemark E, Campbell WK, Rogge RD.
steady”: new directions in understanding romance and sex in The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and
adolescence and emerging adulthood. In: Crouter AC, Booth AE, responses to relationship stress. J Marital Fam Ther. 2007;33(4):
eds. Romance and Sex in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood: 482–500. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.x.
Risks and Opportunities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 31. Tomlinson ER, Yousaf O, Vittersø AD, Jones L. Dispositional
Associates Publishers; 2006:241–258. mindfulness and psychological health: a systematic review.
12. Roisman GI, Masten AS, Coatsworth JD, Tellegen A. Salient and Mindfulness. 2018;9(1):23–43. doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0762-6.
emerging developmental tasks in the transition to adulthood. Child 32. Roberts KC, Danoff-Burg S. Mindfulness and health behaviors: is
Dev. 2004;75(1):123–133. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00658.x. paying attention good for you? J Am Coll Health. 2010;59(3):
13. Kimmes JG, Jaurequi ME, Roberts K, Harris VW, Fincham FD. 165–173. doi:10.1080/07448481.2010.484452.
An examination of the association between relationship mindful- 33. Adams GC, Stoops MA, Skomro RP. Sleep tight: exploring the
ness and psychological and relational well-being in committed relationship between sleep and attachment style across the life
couples. J Marital Fam Ther. 2020;46(1):30–41. doi:10.1111/jmft. span. Sleep Med Rev. 2014;18(6):495–507. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.
12388. 2014.03.002.
14. Troxel WM. It’s more than sex: exploring the dyadic nature of 34. Colten HR, Altevogt BM, eds. Sleep Disorders and Sleep
sleep and implications for health. Psychosom Med. 2010;72(6): Deprivation: An Unmet Public Health Problem. Washington, DC:
578–586. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181de7ff8. Institutes of Medicine of the National Academies Press; 2006.
15. Robles TF, Slatcher RB, Trombello JM, McGinn MM. Marital 35. Arnett JJ. College students as emerging adults: the developmental
quality and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2014; implications of the college context. Emerg. Adulthood. 2016;4(3):
140(1):140–187. doi:10.1037/a0031859. 219–222. doi:10.1177/2167696815587422
16. Slatcher RB, Schoebi D. Protective processes underlying the links 36. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Total fall
between marital quality and physical health. Curr Opin Psychol. enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by
2017;13:148–152. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.09.002. level of enrollment, sex, attendance status, and race/ethnicity or
17. Braithwaite S, Holt-Lunstad J. Romantic relationships and men- nonresident alien status of student: Selected years, 1976 through
tal health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13(13):120–125. doi:10.1016/j. 2018. Available at: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/
copsyc.2016.04.001. tables/dt19_306.10.asp?current=yes. Accessed July 14, 2020.
18. Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: 37. Henry JD, Crawford JR. The short-form version of the
increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity
with the Couples Satisfaction Index. J Fam Psychol. 2007;21(4): and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin
572–583. doi: doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572. Psychol. 2005;44(Pt 2):227–239. doi:10.1348/014466505X29657.
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH 2151
38. Yu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, et al. Development of short forms 49. Osman A, Wong JL, Bagge CL, Freedenthal S, Gutierrez PM,
from the PROMISTM sleep disturbance and sleep-related impair- Lozano G. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21):
ment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2011;10(1):6–24. doi:10.1080/ further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and corre-
15402002.2012.636266. lates. J Clin Psychol. 2012;68(12):1322–1338. doi:10.1002/jclp.
39. Wei M, Russell DW, Mallinckrodt B, Vogel DL. The Experiences 21908.
in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: reliability, validity, 50. Stewart JC, Rand KL, Hawkins MA, Stines JA. Associations of
and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 2007;88(2):187–204. doi:10.
the shared and unique aspects of positive and negative emotional
1080/00223890701268041.
factors with sleep quality. Pers Individ Diff. 2011;50(5):609–614.
40. Graham JM, Unterschute MS. A reliability generalization meta-
analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. J Pers doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.004
Assess. 2015;97(1):31–41. doi:10.1080/00223891.2014.927768. 51. Stallman HM, Ohan JL, Chiera B. The role of social support, being
41. Muthen LK. Muthen BO Mplus User’s Guide. 8th ed. Los present, and self-kindness in university student psychological dis-
Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 1998. 2017. tress. Aust Psychol. 2018;53(1):52–59. doi:10.1111/ap.12271
42. Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and 52. Ong JC, Ulmer CS, Manber R. Improving sleep with mindfulness
Conditional Process Analysis. New York: Guilford Press; 2013. and acceptance: a metacognitive model of insomnia. Behav Res
43. Hayes AF. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Ther. 2012;50(11):651–660. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.08.001.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(1):1–22. doi:10.1080/00273171. 53. Sarmiento JP. Healthy universities: mapping health-promotion
2014.962683. interventions. Health Educ. 2017;117(2):162–175. doi:10.1108/
44. MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. HE-07-2016-0028
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:593–614. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych. 54. Olmstead SB, Pasley K, Meyer AS, Stanford PS, Fincham FD,
58.110405.085542. Delevi R. Implementing relationship education for emerging
45. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Wilson SJ. Lovesick: how couples’ relation- adult college students: insights from the field. J Couple Relatsh
ships influence health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017;13:421–443. Ther. 2011;10(3):215–228. doi:10.1080/15332691.2011.588093
doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111 55. Cottle NR, Thompson AK, Burr BK, Hubler DS. The effectiveness of
46. Troxel WM, Robles TF, Hall M, Buysse DJ. Marital quality and
relationship education in the college classroom. J Couple Relatsh
the marital bed: examining the covariation between relationship
Ther. 2014;13(4):267–283. doi:10.1080/15332691.2014.956357
quality and sleep. Sleep Med Rev. 2007;11(5):389–404. doi:10.
56. Braithwaite SR, Delevi R, Fincham FD. Romantic relationships
1016/j.smrv.2007.05.002.
47. Weisskirch RS. Abilities in romantic relationships and well-being and the physical and mental health of college students. Pers
among emerging adults. Marriage Fam Rev. 2017;53(1):36–47. Relatsh. 2010;17(1):1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01248
doi:10.1080/01494929.2016.1195471 57. Beyers W, Seiffge-Krenke I. Are friends and romantic partners the
48. Alvaro PK, Roberts RM, Harris JK. A systematic review assessing “best medicine”? How the quality of other close relationships medi-
bidirectionality between sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depres- ates the impact of changing family relationships on adjustment. Int
sion. Sleep. 2013;36(7):1059–1068. doi:10.5665/sleep.2810. J Behav Dev. 2007;31(6):559–568. doi:10.1177/0165025407080583.
Copyright of Journal of American College Health is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and
its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email
articles for individual use.