Clinical
Clinical
SKILLS BUILDER
Question 6.48 below is a ‘Plan a study’ question. In DeLapp quantified T’s progress using SUDS. There
this section, you have learned about the key study is another clue in the question that should prompt
by Chapman and DeLapp (2013). You may be able to you to consider another useful area of the syllabus.
borrow ideas from this study to inspire your own. The disorder being asked about is generalised
You are asked to include details about question anxiety disorder. What can you remember about the
formats and scoring. Think about how Chapman and GAD-7?
Strength Weakness
Qualitative data – open question responses provided Generalisation – one 14-year-old boy may not be
detailed insight into Charles’ beliefs, such as ‘What would representative of other age groups (children often count,
happen if your washing routine was disrupted?’. check and repeat movements; adults tend to ruminate).
SKILLS BUILDER
Suggest one way a researcher could increase the reliability of data collected as
part of a case study. [2]
Reliability is an important concept and understanding ways to improve it will
also help you in ‘Plan a study’ questions. Think about Rapoport’s observations
of Charles pouring honey, for example. She could have filmed him and
asked another person to watch and record Charles’ behaviour to test for
inter-observer reliability. You could justify why your idea would increase the SKILLS
consistency of the data. Be careful not to deviate into a discussion of objectivity. BUILDER
Zoubir is a trainee
Measures clinical psychologist.
The Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory He is testing the
validity of a new
» The Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (MOCI) includes 30 true and false structured interview
statements developed through interviews with 30 people with OCD. schedule to assess
» Sample item: ‘I avoid using public telephones because of possible contamination.’ the severity of OCD
» The MOCI categorises respondents into four types: cleaning, checking, slowness symptoms. Plan a
and doubting. correlational study
that will help Zoubir
The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale
with this goal. [10]
» The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) uses a semi-structured
interview schedule with ten items measuring symptom severity (mild to extreme) You will need to
on a five-point scale (0–4). consider all the
general features
» An accompanying checklist can be used to diagnose OCD type.
involved in planning
» Interview duration = 30 minutes.
a study. You will also
▼ Table 6.39 Evaluating the diagnosis and measurement of OCD need to focus on how
Zoubir will measure
Strengths Weaknesses two co-variables
MOCI Reliability – 50 students completed Validity – fixed-choice questions that can be plotted
the MOCI twice one month apart; 89 force people to make a decision and on a scatter graph
per cent responses were the same. items are subjective. For example, in order to assess
‘I use an average amount of soap’ the validity of the
(average for whom?). interview schedule.
Y-BOCS Reliability – agreement was Validity – difficult to report on Can you suggest a
excellent when four interviewers symptoms in ‘the last week’ if suitable directional
assessed 40 people with OCD. symptoms were worse on some days hypothesis for
than others. Zoubir’s study?
SKILLS BUILDER
Evaluate measures of obsessive-compulsive measures. One of the first things you will notice
disorder, including a discussion of quantitative is that, while they are both self-reports, one is a
and qualitative data. [10] questionnaire and the other is a semi-structured
interview. Both result in quantitative data though.
Read through the information in this section
This is because the MOCI interviewer rates the
about the Y-BOCS and the MOCI and create a Venn
person according to what they have said in the
diagram to pick out similarities and differences.
interview. What problems does this raise for the
This should help you to begin evaluating these
MOCI that are less problematic with the Y-BOCS?
SKILLS BUILDER
Peggy is interviewing people with obsessive-compulsive two strengths and two weaknesses of each. This
disorder to investigate whether any of their relatives question requires you to use the strengths that you
also have the same disorder and if so, whether they have learned as reasons why Peggy should use this
share similar symptoms. Peggy has asked you to help format. You will need to think carefully about the
her to think about the interview format and sampling topic of Peggy’s interviews and how the format of the
technique. Which format and technique would you interview could affect the validity and reliability of
choose? the data.
a State two reasons for your choice of interview Likewise, think about the most practical way to
format. [2] recruit a sample of people with OCD. You need
b Explain one reason for your choice of sampling to know how random, volunteer and opportunity
technique. [2] sampling affect generalisability in order to decide
The interview can have a structured, semi-structured upon the best technique. Sometimes the most
or unstructured format. You will need at least scientific is not always the most practical.
Cambridge International AS/A Level Psychology Study and Revision Guide Third Edition 127
Biochemical
Serotonin and/or dopamine imbalance may increase OCD risk. This may be caused by
abnormalities relating to:
» presynaptic serotonin reuptake
» postsynaptic receptors, such as D4 dopamine
» enzymes such as MAO-A (see page 106).
SKILLS BUILDER
Describe the biological explanation of obsessive- explanations assume OCD is inherited’, show that
compulsive disorder. [6] you understand what inherited means. You could say
something like: ‘First-degree relatives of people with
You could discuss genetics and biochemicals here.
OCD are more likely to also have the disorder than
Show both knowledge and understanding in your
more distant relatives as they share more DNA.’
response. For example, instead of saying ‘genetic
Psychological explanations
Cognitive (thinking error)
» People with OCD find it impossible to ignore passing thoughts.
» They make a thinking error; all thoughts must be meaningful and significant.
» The thoughts themselves are not problematic; the meaning attached to them
causes distress (e.g. shame, disgust).
» Thought-action/event fusion: people believe that imagining a certain action or
event increases its probability.
» Compulsions are seen as a way of neutralising obsessive/negative thoughts.
» Personal responsibility for negative outcomes may be overestimated, leading to
anxiety.
SKILLS BUILDER
Roxy and Dana are discussing the cognitive suggest that OCD is caused by dispositional factors
explanation of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Roxy that differ between people, whereas situational
thinks it is more of an individual explanation, whereas explanations emphasise environmental cues
Dana thinks it could also be seen as a situational which trigger OCD symptoms. You need to state
explanation. Explain whether you agree more with whether you agree more with Roxy or Dana and
Roxy or with Dana. [2] give a reason. Then elaborate by stating why the
information you have presented supports either an
There is no right or wrong answer, so long as you
individual or a situational explanation.
can justify your reason. Individual explanations
SKILLS BUILDER
Compare the genetic explanation and the psychodynamic same point, using connectives such as ‘likewise’
explanation of obsessive-compulsive disorder. [4] (similarity) and/or ‘whereas’ (difference). You could
compare the explanations with regards to issues
Anywhere that you see two or more explanations in
and debates (e.g. ‘the genetic explanation is more
the syllabus, be prepared for a compare question.
reductionist because … whereas the psychodynamic
You may present either two similarities, two
approach is more holistic because … ‘) or
differences or one of each. Comparison points
applications to everyday life.
usually include both explanations within the
Strengths Weaknesses
Biological Evidence – silencing the SLITRK5 gene caused Validity – exercise caution when extrapolating
compulsive grooming and hoarding behaviour in data from mice to humans. Mice can only display
mice (Shmelkov et al., 2010). compulsions; this does not explain the origin of
obsessions.
Applications – led to the development of drug Comparison – high concordance rates in
treatments, such as clomipramine (see Rapoport, family!studies can also be explained by nurture
1989, see page 125). (e.g. modelling).
Psychological Evidence – people with ‘checking-type’ OCD Unscientific – psychodynamic concepts such
reported decreased urges and distress when as id and superego are unfalsifiable; there is no
told that they were not responsible for negative evidence that people with OCD are more likely to
outcomes (Lopatka and Rachman, 1995). have experienced conflicts aged 1–3.
Applications – therapies such as exposure and Comparison – psychological explanations
response prevention (ERP; see page 130) were cannot explain genetic evidence, such as the low
developed as a result of psychological theories. frequency of allele 2 of the DRD4 gene in people
with OCD.
Cambridge International AS/A Level Psychology Study and Revision Guide Third Edition 129
6.5.3 Treatment and management of obsessive-
compulsive disorder
Biological treatments
» OCD is treated with medications that increase serotonin (SSRIs) and
noradrenaline (tricyclics, e.g. clomipramine; see page 106).
» Treatment-resistant patients may be prescribed risperidone (an atypical
antipsychotic; see page 96).
Strengths Weaknesses
Validity – the study used method Case study – can only generalise with
triangulation; primary data = observation, caution. Jason had average IQ and a lot
interview, psychometric tests (IQ test of support at home/school. ERP may not
and Y-BOCS), secondary data = medical work for all children with ASD.
records.
Replicable – an RCT with 46 adults with Application – ERP may only have been
ASD supports the efficacy of ERP for this effective due to the skills of the specific
population (Russell et al., 2013). therapist; other therapists may not form
such effective therapeutic alliances.
SKILLS BUILDER
Evaluate psychological treatments for obsessive- the efficacy of CBT and ERP. Compare the types of
compulsive disorder, including a discussion of the evidence they supply, such as the validity of Lovell
use of children in research. [10] et al. versus Lehmkuhl et al. You could also discuss
how these therapies compare to the use of SSRIs.
Now that you have almost reached the end of the
Most importantly, though, you need to address the
clinical chapter, you should be quite familiar with
named issue. Think about how the therapies can be
ways of evaluating treatments. Start by discussing
adapted for children (e.g. Lehmkuhl et al.) and why
research evidence (e.g. Lehmkuhl et al., 2008; Lovell
psychological therapies might be preferred to drug
et al., 2006). Focus on how the findings demonstrate
treatments with child patients.
Cambridge International AS/A Level Psychology Study and Revision Guide Third Edition 131
SKILLS BUILDER
a Plan a randomised control trial to test the For example, the researchers used an independent
effectiveness of SSRIs as a treatment for measures design with random allocation. You could
obsessive-compulsive disorder. Your plan must randomly allocate your participants to either the
include details about controlled variables and SSRI group or a control group.
a directional or non-directional hypothesis. [10]
You could use a study from another part of the
b For one piece of psychological knowledge on chapter to help you if you wish. For example,
which your plan is based: Grant et al. (2008) compared opiate antagonists
i Describe this psychological knowledge. [4] (for gambling disorder) with a placebo group. You
ii Explain how you used two features of this could also use placebos in your study. For part
psychological knowledge to plan your b, think carefully whether you would rather write
experiment. [4] about Lovell et al. or Grant et al. Think about the
Try to identify a study you have learned about with similarities between their study and the one you are
the same research method. This will provide you with planning. You will need two identifiable features that
ideas for your own study. Lovell et al. (2006) is an RCT inspired your planning – for example, double-blind
comparing two modern versions of ERP. You can use design, use of a psychometric test (e.g. Y-BOCS).
some of the design features to help plan your study.
Strengths Weaknesses
Reliability – baseline measures were taken twice Validity – the blinding procedure broke down for 13 per cent of
(test-retest). participants, reducing validity due to possible researcher bias.
Validity – random allocation reduced the effect of Longitudinal design – 11 people dropped out. Attrition can lead
participant variables, such as symptom severity, to differences in key participant variables between the groups,
employment and marital status. reducing validity and generalisability.
SKILLS BUILDER
Explain why random allocation was used to assign of people receiving telephone versus face-to-face
participants to the two groups in the key study by ERP). Can you think of any individual differences
Lovell et al. (2006) about telephone-administered that might have caused the average to be higher
cognitive-behavioural therapy. [2] in one group than the other (besides the type of
therapy)? Random allocation would mean that any
If you are unsure about any of the methodological
difference in the Y-BOCS averages is more likely
concepts mentioned, revisit them now (e.g. for
to be due to the type of therapy (the independent
random allocation, see page 59). Link your ideas to
variable) than participant variables, such as
specific details from the study. Think about what
comorbid disorders, age or gender.
was being measured (i.e. average Y-BOCS scores
Strengths Weaknesses
Biological Evidence – a meta-analysis of RCTs showed that Individual differences – up to 60 per cent of
17 real drugs were superior to placebos. people report no improvement.
Comparison – low commitment and effort Applications – improvement can take 12 weeks;
compared with psychological therapies, also maintenance doses may be required to prevent
cheaper and therefore more accessible. relapse.
Psychological Supporting evidence – see Lehmkuhl et al. Applications – difficult to deliver for
(2008) and Lovell et al. (2006), both below. inexperienced therapists who sometimes fail to
include relatives and friends, who reinforce OCD
behaviours.
Comparison – 86 per cent of ERP clients Applications – old compulsions may be replaced
achieved a clinically relevant reduction in with new ones unless the therapist is able to
symptoms, compared with 48 per cent of people reveal the core underlying fear.
taking clomipramine.
SKILLS BUILDER
Floss is a cognitive-behavioural therapist. She is PDI culture, he might see Floss as an authority
working with Manal, who has obsessive-compulsive figure and expect her to tell him how to recover.
disorder. Explain how cultural differences between If Floss is from a low PDI culture, she might see
Floss and Manal might influence the effectiveness Manal as an equal and expect him to participate in
of the treatment she provides. [2] creating treatment goals. Once you have thought
of some ideas, re-read the question. It is about
Think about what you have learnt about the
effectiveness of treatment, so you need to think
ways cultures differ from one another, such as
about whether these differences might make the
individualism-collectivism and power distance
treatment more or less effective and why.
index. You also need to think about key features of
CBT (e.g. it is collaborative). If Manal is from a high
Cambridge International AS/A Level Psychology Study and Revision Guide Third Edition 133