Annexure 9 - Safety performance Evaluation form

Plant
Tata Steel Limited, India
Org Unit ------------------------------------------------------------------

Vendor Location -------------------------------------------------------

Vendor -----------------------------------------------------------------

Evaluation Date &Time -----------------------------------------------

Work Order No. ------------------------------------------------------- Vendor Code------------------

Implementation of Safety System and Process

Marks Audit Finding (Please enter
Sl.No. Attributes Weightage Evaluation Rating
Obtained Remarks)
2.1.A Capability of Workforce, (Skilled a) Deployment of below 70% certified employees at site, Score - 0 marks
,Certified Competent Supervisor, Site Safety Supervisors and b) Deployment of 70- 90 % certified employees at site & having up to 15-
manpower etc.) Verify through site visit and Interview. -- # 30% employee in gold & platinum proficiency : Score - 10 marks c)
Deployment of certified supervisors Deployment of 90- 100% certified employees at site with right skill in right
,site safety supervisors and specific job required employees from job & having 30-50 % employee in gold & platinum proficiency Score- 20
JNTVTI or other TSL approved institutions. 25 marks d) Deployment of 100%
certified employees at site with right skill in right job & having more than 50
% employee in gold & platinum proficiency Score- 25 marks

2.1.B Capability of Workforce, (Skilled a) Inadequate hazard identification and poor implementation of safety
,Certified Competent Supervisor, Site Safety Supervisors and measures mentioned in work permit, Score – 0 marks b)
manpower etc.) Verify through site visit and Interview. -- Hazard Inclusion of Job specific, site specific hazards & safety measures mentioned
identification and Risk assessment :Inclusion of site specific , job and addressed adequately in work permit , Score – 5 marks
specific and adequate six directional hazard in Work permit .Job 10 c) Job specific, site specific hazards and safety measures mentioned
Hazard Analysis by contractor supervisors .Learnings from JHA adequately in work permit and known to the working group. Score – 10
incorporating in ʻSOPʼ marks

2.1.C Capability of Workforce, (Skilled a) Non-compliance captured with respect to applicable safety standard , SOP
,Certified Competent Supervisor, Site Safety Supervisors and and permit system , Score - 0 marks b) Non-
manpower etc.) Verify through site visit and Interview. -- # compliance captured with respect to only one aspect ( applicable safety
Compliance to deployment of applicable safety standards at site as standard , SOP or work permit system)Score - 10 marks c)
15 100% compliance to applicable safety standards , ‘SOP’ & work permit
mentioned in “SOP” and permit system
system , Score - 15 marks
2.2.A Conducting Tool box, mass meeting regularly and leadership a) In adequate records on Toolbox meetings and participation below 80% in
engagement (Contractor proprietor line walk). (Verify through Tool Box meetings, Score – 0 marks
Records, Interview & site visit) --# Conducting Tool Box meetings b) Maintaining adequate records & 100% participation of work men
daily at all sites of location by site supervisors , site safety supervisors &supervisors in Tool Box meetings, Score – 10 marks
.Participation of Proprietor / Locational in charge in Line walks and 20 c) Compliance of tool box meeting points being captured & reviewed ,Score
Monthly mass meetings and maintaining records – 20 marks

2.2.B Conducting Tool box, mass meeting regularly and leadership a) Below 80% compliance of monthly line walk & mass meeting, Score - 0
engagement (Contractor proprietor line walk). (Verify through marks
Records, Interview & site visit) -- Coverage of 100% employees of all b) Monthly compliance of line walk & safety mass meeting & record
the sites of Location in Tool Box Meetings available - 10 marks c)
Monthly compliance of line walk by proprietor being captured in E Proc (IT
20 system)) & mass meeting record available -15 marks d) compliance
of line walk & mass meeting points , 20 marks

2.2.C Conducting Tool box, mass meeting regularly and leadership a) Compliance of learning of the Incidents of the department /division
engagement (Contractor proprietor line walk). (Verify through /location , is less than 80%– 0 marks b)
Records, Interview & site visit) -- # Compliance on points captured Compliance of learning of the Incidents of the department /division /location
during proprietor line walks , compliance is 80-94%%– 5marks c)
10
,Tool Box meetings and Mass meetings Compliance of Learning of the Incidents of the department /division /location
, compliance is more than 95%– 10 marks

2.3.A Providing & ensuring usage of standard (IS/EN) and right PPEs while a)Hazard mapping not available ,score – 0 marks
performing the job. Ensure timely replacements. (Verify through site b) Availability of Hazard mapping with the current job requirements but non-
visit and Interview). compliance related to use of PPE observed, score – 10 marks c)
-- Hazard mapping with respect to location specific and usage of Availability of Hazard mapping and 100% employees using required and
20 standard PPE ,score – 20 marks
applicable and standard PPEs by contractor employees at working site

2.3.B Providing & ensuring usage of standard (IS/EN) and right PPEs while a)Some of employees using defective PPE , score - 0 marks
performing the job. Ensure timely replacements. (Verify through site b) 100% employees using non defective PPE ,score - 20 marks
visit and Interview).
-- Physical condition of PPE using by employees at working site
20

2.3.C Providing & ensuring usage of standard (IS/EN) and right PPEs while a)Poor compliance on Audits on PPE usage and review , score – 0 marks
performing the job. Ensure timely replacements. (Verify through site b) Regular audits by supervisors with specified frequency and review by
visit and Interview). 10 vendor on monthly basis , score – 10 marks
-- Regular audits on usage of PPE by supervisors and review of PPE
quality and improvements by vendor
2.4.A Providing & ensuring safe usage of standard, certified and right tools a)List of Standard, applicable Tools & Tackles not available , score – 0
& tackles, equipment's and calibrated safety gadgets (e.g. Gas marks
detectors) while performing the job. (Verify through Records and Site b) List of Standard, applicable Tools & Tackles available but non-compliance
visit) -- Availability and usage of applicable and standard tools & observed at site, score – 10 marks c) List of
20
tackles by contractor at working site 100% Standard, applicable Tools & Tackles available and no non-compliance
observed score – 20 marks

2.4.B Providing & ensuring safe usage of standard, certified and right tools a) Legal compliance not followed and poor condition of Tools & Tackles ,
& tackles, equipment's and calibrated safety gadgets (e.g. Gas score – 0 marks b) 100%
detectors) while performing the job. (Verify through Records and Site 20 Legal compliance being followed and all the Tools & Tackles are defective
visit) -- Physical condition & legal compliance of applicable tools- free ,score - 20 marks
tackles & equipment at working site ( As applicable)
2.4.C Providing & ensuring safe usage of standard, certified and right tools a) Poor compliance of audits and review , score – 0 marks b)
& tackles, equipment's and calibrated safety gadgets (e.g. Gas Regular audits by supervisors with specified frequency and review by vendor
detectors) while performing the job. (Verify through Records and Site 10 on monthly basis , score – 10 marks
visit) -- Tools & Tackles based audit by contractor's supervisors (site
verification)
2.5.A Ensuring a good housekeeping free from any slip / trip / fall hazards a) Poor house keeping at site ,score – 0 marks b)
at working sites. (Verify through site visit) - 100% compliance to excellent House keeping at site , storage & contractor
- Working sites house keeping maintained in systematic approach 15 shed , score – 15 marks
.Material storage area, stores area and rest sheds orderliness
maintained. Free from Slip / Trip / Fall hazards.
2.5.B Ensuring a good housekeeping free from any slip / trip / fall hazards a) Concept of 1S & 2S not followed , score – 0 marks b)
at working sites. (Verify through site visit) - Deployment of 1S & 2S at site, storage & contractor shed ,score - 15 marks
15
- Implementation of 1S ,2S at site.

2.5.C Ensuring a good housekeeping free from any slip / trip / fall hazards a) Poor compliance of audits and review , score – 0 marks
at working sites. (Verify through site visit) - b) Regular audits by supervisors with specified frequency and review by
-#and approach for 5S concept at working sites . Check list developed vendor on monthly basis , score – 10 marks c)
on 5s and being followed regularly 20
Concept of 5 S & Visual workplace management is deployed , score -20
marks

2.6.A Self-Safety Initiative / Project by contractor for Safety Improvement -- a) System not exist and poor engagement of top leadership ,score – 0 marks
# System of safety improvement projects exist and known to 100% b) System exist for capturing suggestions by employees and other stake
supervisors. Involvement of top management in self initiated safety holders related to safety improvement projects & involvement of top
projects (record of no. of suggestion received, no. of suggestion leadership in implementation of safety improvement projects .score – 10
10
implementation, resource provision) marks

2.6.B Self-Safety Initiative / Project by contractor for Safety Improvement -- a) Less than 4 nos of safety improvement projects in a year – 0 marks b)
# Safety improvement projects implemented at working sites Minimum 4 safety improvement projects implemented - 20 marks
20
2.6.C Self-Safety Initiative / Project by contractor for Safety Improvement -- a) Less than 2 nos of system related safety improvement projects in a year,
# Safety improvement projects implemented at working sites -- score -0 marks b)
Safety projects to improve system related gaps Minimum 2 nos. System related safety improvement project implemented ,
score - 10 marks c)
20
Confirmation of Implementation of all types of safety improvement projects
in field by CO /TSL representative & assessor , score -20 marks

Total 300