Topic: More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life.

What
problems will this cause? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the
impact of this trend.
It is true that there are more and more immigrants people in cities, where have been seen
as place of opportunity which are abound (đầy tràn) in life-improving opportunities to
improve their life . Undoubtedly, there will be some negative consequences of this trend,
but steps can be taken to tackle these problems.
As a massive influx of people flock to cities in the hope that their lives can be changed
for the better, several related problems can be anticipated. Firstly, live living expenses
have become increasingly high costly/ pricey (đắt đỏ) since demand exceeds supply, have
having a somewhat negative impact on city dwellers' quality of life (cụm hiện tại phân từ
chỉ kết quả). For example, many poverties poor families make do with living in
unhygienic conditions and without clean water in filthy slums with the purpose of earning
enough money to afford payments for common expenses like food, gasoline, rent, utility
bills, their child's tuition fees. Secondly, competition for jobs have has become
increasingly fierce, and even search of a looking for/ searching for work offering a living
wage is also extremely stressful, since employment opportunities are one of the root
causes that drive people to migrate. Finally, due to increased carbon dioxide emissions
from traffic, environmental pollution in many cities, such as Beijing, Mumbai, Ho Chi
Minh city, has reached alarming levels, have having far-reaching health consequences for
inhabitants. life (cụm hiện tại phân từ chỉ kết quả)
However, there are many possible solutions to resolve these problems. Firstly, the
government can invest money in affordable housing schemes to support people in
decrease decreasing their daily expenditure / cost of living expenses. For instance, the
30.000 billion loan programmer programme launched by the Vietnamese government
offered low to mid-income households in Ho Chi Minh City an opportunity to buy newly
constructed apartments at prices significantly less than their market value and with
preferential interest rates to have a better life quality life. A second measure would be for
politicians should to ban traffic in city centres during rush hours, but if this is were
impracticable (đặt giả thuyết = câu ĐK loại 2), they can could impose a congestion
charge on motorists and motorcyclists entering the most traffic-clogged streets. A third
option would be for the government should to redirect migrant labour to provincial towns
and rural areas, by, such as relocate relocating industrial zones to those areas, to ease the
pressure on major cities.
In conclusion, the government could certainly implement a range of feasible (khả thi)
measures to enhance the quality of life for all city residents.
Topic: More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life. What
are the reason for this? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the
impact of this trend.
It is true that there are more and more immigrant people in cities, where have been seen
as place of opportunity to improve their life. There are several causes of this trend, and
steps can be taken to tackle the problems. (sửa như trên)
There are several reasons why more and more people gravitate towards big cities. Firstly,
poor economic conditions and a lack of employment opportunities in small towns and
villages are main push factors in population drifts to urban areas. By contrast, better
economic conditions, include including employment opportunities available in cities and
megacities, operate as pull factors that attract rural people towards them. Secondly, most
of people do not want do abide by traditional ways of life advocated and upheld by older
generations in rural areas; they favour the cosmopolitan character of cities, which
manifests itself as individual freedom, sex equality, cultural diversity, and respect for
difference, and reasons this is the reason why they decide to migrate. Finally, natural
calamities like tempests, floods, earthquakes, and droughts are also determining factors in
exodus of rural workers from the countrysides countryside (usually in singular form) to
metropolitan areas in search of sustainable livelihood.
In order to solve this problem, various measure can be adopted. Firstly, government can
invest money in affordable housing schemes to support people decrease expenses. For
instance, the 30.000 billion loan programmer launched by the Vietnam government low
to mid-income household in Ho Chi Minh City opportunity to buy newly constructed
apartments at prices significantly less than their market value and with preferential
interest rates to have a better quality life. A second measure would be politicians should
ban traffic in city centres during rush hours, if this is impracticable, they can impose a
congestion charge on motorist and motorcyclists entering the most traffic-clogged streets.
A third option would be government should redirect migrant labour to provincial towns
and rural areas, by, such as relocate industrial zones to those areas, to ease the pressure
on major cities. (sửa như trên)
In conclusion, for a variety of reasons, more and more rural people are gravitate
gravitating towards/ flocking to/ flooding in big cities, yet, governments could take steps
to cope with this issue.
Topic: In many cities the use of video cameras in public places is being increased in
order to reduce crime, but some people believe that these measure restrict our
individual freedom. Do the benefits of increased security outweigh the drawbacks?
It is true that in recent years, video surveillance has become commonplace in many cities.
While I recognize the possible disadvantages of camera surveillance which make citizen
to see this as an invasion of privacy (khúc này không đúng với template rồi, em xem lại
rồi tự bổ sung nha).
On the one hand, I admit that for a variety of reasons, the use of video surveillance in
public can be objected to. Firstly, these cameras erode our right to privacy, in the sense
that they record our every movement in wherever we are, such as supermarkets, banks,
hospitals and condom specialty shops. Video recordings by this piece of equipment (non-
count) will be used by authorities for dubious purposes carefully concealed from the
public, and many people consider this to be abuse of power, which encroaches upon their
liberty. Secondly, CCTV cameras only create a false feeling of safety, considering that
they cannot prevent crime once it is in progress. Finally, tech-savvy criminals can find
out a way of to hacking hack video cameras and take advantage of use (best choice in
this context) video evidence to blackmail their victims into agreeing to their demands.
Despite the negatives mentioned above, I believe that video monitoring of publics spaces
is a positive measure for the following reasons. Firstly, keeps keeping public areas under
video surveillance will contribute to crime reduction by deterring those with bad
intentions from engaging in criminal activity. For instance, petty criminals or like
shoplifters or pickpockets will be less able to operate in where (conj) security cameras
are installed, since they can foresee the strong possibility of being caught by police.
Secondly, video cameras offer valuable support to police officers, in the sense that they
provide video evidence which police can use to arrest and prosecute those who flee the
scene after committing crimes. Finally, panoramic CCTV cameras have been installed in
at intersections that can help prevent people from speeding or running a red light, as well
as help the relevant authorities monitor road conditions to make real-time traffic reports.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential benefits of video monitoring are more
significant than the possible drawbacks.