1. ‘A’ is accused of a crime. It is shown that soon after the crime he is absconding from his place.

Is this fact relevant? How?(Repeated )

2. ‘A’ a married woman has committed suicide after leaving a note that her husband and his
relatives subjected her to cruelty. Decide the relevancy of the suicide note.
3. ‘A’ agreed in writing to sell a cow to ‘B’ for Rs.20,000/- or Rs.30,000/-. ‘B’ wants to lead
evidence to show the price as Rs.20,000/-. Can he do so?
4. ‘X’ a Lunatic, before dying said that ‘Y’- stabbed him. Is X’s dying declaration admissible.
5. The question is, what was the date of death of Mrs. ‘J’. A letter from Mrs.J’s son-in-law to a
friend, announcing the death of ‘J’ on a particular day, and request to perform the customary
Poojas. Whether it is relevant to identify the date of death of ‘J’.
6. “E” attempted to cross a railway track. But E withdrawing the arrival of train left his two
wheeler on the track and run away. Railway Protection force files a case against ‘E’. Who has
to prove it?
7. ‘A’ is tried for the murder of ‘B’ by poison. The fact is that before the death of ‘B’, ‘A’
procured similar poison that which was administered to B. Is this fact relevant?
8. A client sells his property to his advocate and then brings a suit against him for setting aside
the sale on the ground of fraud. On whom the burden of proving the good faith of the
transaction lies? State the reasons.
9. ‘A’ is accused of an offence. During police custody he revealed about the place where he had
hidden the weapons used for the offence. Weapons were discovered from that place by the
police. What is the evidentiary value of his statement to police?
10. During the Police custody a beggar was shot by a station house officer. On whom the burden
of proof lies?
11. “N” borded Muthu Nagar express train, N made his booking through online mode; but his
ticket was not confirmed. In this circumstance Muthu Nagar express met with an accident
near Ariyalur and due to this N died. During online-registration of tickets N has paid the
insurance charges. But before the incident, online-ticket charges returned to N and later he
died. Railway authority denies to insurance claim and reject the application; because of his
ticket less travel. In this case which is the question of issue? – Decide.
12. “S” alleges that “P” who is the superior of “S” scolded and assaulted him in closed room. Thus
“S” lodges a complaint. To prove this “S” files a petition before the court demanding the CCTV
footage to prove his case. Whether P’s office CCTV recordings can be allowed as an evidence?
– Decide.
13. A prosecution witness was asked whether he had quarrelled with the family of the accused
but he denied it. Whether evidence can be adduced to prove the facts of the quarrel?
14. The husband while returning home in two wheeler caused death of a person who was crossing
the road. The husband told the facts to his wife. Whether wife can give evidence against the
husband in court?
15. A, orally tells B that he had seen C murdering D. Decide the admissibility of it.
16. ‘A’ a corona patient before death says that he died because of wrong treatment of doctors. Is
A’s statement admissible?
17. X was not found for 7 years. The court passed a judgement that he died. Later X returned
after 8 years. Decide the validity of judgement.
18. ‘A’ orally gifts a property to B. B was in enjoyment for 12 years. Later A sued B for
cancellation of oral gift. Decide.
19. A married woman committed suicide within a period of seven years from the date of her
marriage. Her mother-in-law without the knowledge of her husband subjected her to cruelty.
Can there be a presumption as to abetment of suicide by husband?
20. The question between ‘A’ and ‘B’ is whether a certain document is forged or not. ‘A’ affirms
that it is genuine and ‘B’ affirms that it is forged. Whether ‘A’ can prove a statement by
himself that the document is genuine and by ‘B’ that the document is forged?
21. ‘A’ is accused before the court of session of attempt to commit murder of a police officer
whilst on his trial before ‘B’ a session judge. Whether ‘B’ may be examined as to what
occurred?
22. A desires a court to give judgement that he is entitled to certain lands in the possession of B,
by reason of facts which he asserts and which B denies to be true. Who must prove the
existence of facts.
23. A is accused for murder of B. B knew that A had murdered C previously and B tried to extort
money from A by threatening to make his knowledge to police. Is this fact is relevant?
24. A is tried for having committed a crime at Calcutta on a particular day. He leads in evidence to
the fact that on that day he was at Lahore. Is it relevant?
25. A is stabbed to death by B. C is an eye witness to this occurrence. C informs this to his friend
D. Decide the admissibility of the oral evidence given by C at the time of trial of B for murder.
26. An accused person makes the following statement to the police, “I will show you where I have
hidden my share from the bank robbery”. Discuss the admissibility of this statement.
27. ‘A’ an accused of murder, claims that he was insane and did not know the nature of the act.
State whether the burden of proving insanity is on the accused person or on the prosecution?
28. The question is whether A had been guilty of cruelty towards B, his wife. Whether the
expression of their feeling towards each other shortly before and after the alleged cruelty are
relevant?
29. A has proposed to prove, by a copy, the contents of a document said to be lost. State the
method of proof prescribed by the law to prove the contents of the document.
30. The question is whether ‘A’ robbed ‘B’. The fact is shortly before the robbery. ‘B’ went to a
fair with money in his possession and that he showed it, or mentioned the fact that he had the
money to third persons. Wthether the fact is relevant, if so how is it relevant?
31. The question is whether ‘A’ committed a crime. The fact is that ‘A’ absconded after receiving a
letter warning him that inquiry was being made for the criminal. Whether the contents of the
letter are relevant?
32. A is charged for shooting at B with an intention to kill him. Whether A’s intent may be proved
by the fact of ‘A’ having previously shot at ‘B’.
33. A witness is asked whether he was dismissed from service for dishonesty and he denies it.
Evidence is offered to show that he was dismissed for dishonesty. Discuss the admissibility of
such evidence.
34. ‘A’ sues ‘B’ for the price of goods sold and delivered to ‘B’. ‘C’ says that ‘A ‘ delivered the
goods to ‘B’. Evidence is offered to show that, on a previous occasion, he said that he had not
delivered the goods to ‘B’. Is the evidence of ‘C’ admissible?
35.