Lear Study Pack One 25
Lear Study Pack One 25
WW W.H OG AN NO TES.COM
King Lear begins with an old king who, in his desire to retire from the duties of
monarchy, makes a catastrophic decision that sets in motion the tragic events
of the play. Lear’s decision to divide his kingdom between his daughters,
based on how much they claim to love him, showcases his vanity and need
for validation. Lear addresses his court, announcing that he will: “shake all
cares and business from our age, / Conferring them on younger
strengths, while we / Unburthened crawl toward death” (Act 1, Scene 1).
His wish is to retain the title of king but without the responsibilities of
governance.
In demanding that his daughters publicly declare their love for him, Lear
unwittingly invites the betrayal that will lead to his downfall. Goneril, the eldest
daughter, speaks rst. She offers him exaggerated praise, stating that she
loves him “more than words can wield the matter; / Dearer than eyesight,
space, and liberty” (Act 1, Scene 1). This excessive attery pleases Lear,
and he rewards Goneril with a third of his kingdom. Regan, the middle
daughter, follows suit and insists that her love for Lear is even greater, saying
that Goneril “comes too short” in her expressions of love and that she is “an
enemy to all other joys” except her father’s love (Act 1, Scene 1). These
false declarations of love not only demonstrate the daughters’ manipulation of
Lear but also expose his tragic aw—his inability, as result of his hubris, to
discern true loyalty from deceit.
ⓒ Cian Hogan English Notes 2025 3
fi
fl
fl
Cordelia, the youngest and most beloved daughter, refuses to engage in this
competition of false attery. Instead, she simply states, “I love your majesty /
According to my bond; no more nor less” (Act 1, Scene 1). Cordelia’s
honesty and refusal to embellish her feelings are interpreted by Lear as
ingratitude. In a rash decision, Lear disowns Cordelia, declaring, “Here I
disclaim all my paternal care, / Propinquity and property of blood” (Act 1,
Scene 1). This impulsive act not only severs his relationship with Cordelia but
also foreshadows the tragedy that will unfold as Lear hands over his power
to the disloyal Goneril and Regan.
Lear’s loyal advisor, Kent, immediately perceives the gravity of Lear’s mistake
and attempts to intervene. He pleads with Lear to reconsider his actions: “See
better, Lear, and let me still remain / The true blank of thine eye” (Act 1,
Scene 1). However, Lear, blinded by pride (hubris) and “wrath”, banishes
Kent for his de ance. This moment is crucial in the play, as it highlights Lear’s
blindness to those who truly care for him and his susceptibility to manipulation
by those who seek power.
Meanwhile, the subplot involving Gloucester and his sons intensi es. Edmund
continues his manipulation of Gloucester by further incriminating Edgar,
leading Gloucester to declare his son an outlaw. Edgar, now in hiding,
disguises himself as “Poor Tom,” a mad beggar, and takes refuge in the
Blinded and cast out, Gloucester is left to wander the heath, where he
encounters Edgar, who is still disguised as Poor Tom. Gloucester, unaware of
his son’s true identity, asks Poor Tom to lead him to Dover, where he hopes to
end his suffering. Edgar, deeply moved by his father’s plight, agrees to guide
him, though he continues to withhold his identity. Gloucester’s blindness
becomes a powerful metaphor for the theme of insight and understanding in
the play. Like Lear, Gloucester is only able to see the truth when he has been
physically blinded.
The nal act of King Lear brings the play’s various plot lines to a tragic and
violent conclusion. The French forces, led by Cordelia, and the English
forces, commanded by Edmund, prepare for battle. However, before the
battle begins, the focus shifts to the personal con icts between the
characters. Goneril and Regan’s rivalry for Edmund’s affection reaches its
peak, as Goneril secretly poisons Regan to eliminate her as a rival. This act
of treachery further underscores the destructive nature of their ambition and
betrayal.
On the battle eld, the French forces are defeated, and Lear and Cordelia are
captured by Edmund. Despite their defeat, Lear is content to be with Cordelia,
imagining a future where they can live together in peace: “Come, let’s away
to prison; / We two alone will sing like birds i’ the cage” (Act 5, Scene 3).
This moment, though tinged with sadness, offers a brief respite from the
tragedy, as Lear nds solace in his daughter’s presence.
Lear’s death soon follows. As he cradles Cordelia’s body, Lear’s heart breaks
from the weight of his grief. His nal words, “Look there, look there!” (Act 5,
Scene 3), suggest a eeting moment of hope that Cordelia might still be alive,
but it is too late. Lear dies, and the stage is left with the broken remnants of a
once-great family.
The play concludes with Albany, Edgar, and Kent left to pick up the pieces.
Albany offers to restore order to the kingdom, but the nal note of the play is
one of profound loss and tragedy. The deaths of Lear, Cordelia, Gloucester,
Goneril, Regan, and Edmund underscore the destructive consequences
of betrayal, ambition, and the failure to see the truth.
“Throughout the course of the play, both Lear and Gloucester are tragic
characters, but Lear develops into the more heroic figure.
Leaving Cert “King Lear” 2016
judgements.
K IN G LEA R : A tte n d th e lo rd s o f F r a n c e a n d
Burgundy, Gloucester.
darker purpose.
Give me the map there. Know that we
have divided In three our kingdom:
Le a r’s i ns e c u re a nd r a s h na tu re is e v id e n t in
③ s o me o f hi s i m p or ta nt ch o ic es /de ci s io n s
hi s g ro w th in k no w le d ge a nd j o u r n e y to w a rd s
④ s el f- a w a re n e s s / a g row i n g s en s e o f a ltr u is m /
s o c ia l co ns c i en c e et c c a n be s e e n i n s o m e o f h i s
c ho i c e s/d e c is io n s
๏ ③ ➠ Lear’s decision:
๏ ④ ➠ The Love Test which is both artificial and perverse reveals the
with regards that stand aloof from the entire point”; and
๏ Lear’s sins are derived from pride and vanity (hubris); he wants to
give away the responsibility of kingship and still retain his title and
his power.
๏ So, Lear's character and actions reflect his tragic flaw. (Hubris)
๏ In other words, as Regan points out: “he hath ever but slenderly
known himself.”
limitless.
๏ It would seem then that careful thought has gone into the division of
the kingdom and that Lear is genuinely well-intentioned in his wish
1
๏ However, his treatment of Cordelia which is spiteful, vindictive
1 Triadic expressions are very effective because they create emphasis in an aesthetically pleasing manner.
B e t t e r t h ou
Ha ds t n ot b e e n b o r n t h a n n o t t o h a v e
pl e a se d m e b e t t e r.
๏ So a t t he b e g in ni ng of t he pl a y, it i s ve r y ob v io u s th at L ea r
i s in g e nui ne ne e d o f reh a b i l i t at i o n .
“Shakespeare explores both the destructive and the redemptive power of love throughout
the play, King Lear.”
Discuss this statement, supporting your answer with reference to the play.
Leaving Cert “King Lear” 2016
pa r a dig m o f th e C hri s t ia n no ti o n o f p il gr i m ag e.
๏ At t he he a r t o f a ny e x plo ra ti o n o f L e ar ’s tr a gi c j ou r n ey i s
i de a t ha t , a l t ho ug h he d o e s n’t d es er v e to su ff er in th e
man ne r th a t h e d oe s, ( he is a m a n “m o re s in ne d a ga in s t
๏ O wi ng t o w h a t G o ne r il do es to h im , L e ar ’s a ge i s ex p o se d
a s a so u rc e o f g re at w e a k ne s s . H e is red u c ed f ro m a
pow er ful ki ng t o :
‘ a po o r o l d m an
A s f ul l of g r ie f a s ag e, wre t c he d in
bot h . ’
man ne r, h e c u rse s th e c a l cu l at in g c r u el ty of Go n er i l an d
beg i ns to se e t ha t he w a s w ro ng in tr u s tin g h er e m p ty
promises of love and in making his daughters his
ha ve a tha nk l e ss chi l d! ”
๏ H is i ne ffec t ua l th re a t t ha t he w i ll do ‘s uc h t h in gs [ … t ha t ]
sha l l be | The t e r ro r s o f t h e e a r t h’ m u st b e p ai n f u l to h im
b ec a us e, d e e p d ow n , he m u st re al is e th at it is n o w
a n e m p ty o n e .
of l e a r ni ng f ro m h i s m is ta ke s .
๏ W h e n h e j o u r n e y s t o G l o u c e s t e r ’s c a s t l e , t h e F o o l ’s
pre di c t io n t ha t R ega n w i l l p ro v e j u st a s “ b it t e r ” a s h e r
๏ Ab o ve a l l she und e rs ta nd s h i s te nd e n cy to j u d ge l ov e o n a
m a t he m a t ic a l s c a le.
๏ An d it i s t hi s fo o l i s h n es s t ha t s h e s ets a b ou t ex p l oi tin g i n a
mal i c io u s a n d spi t e fu l m an n er.
๏ Wh en Le a r a p pe a l s t o:
E ff e ct s of c ou r t e s y, d u e s o f g r a t it u d e ;
h is su ff eri ng i s p la i n to se e. H e w e e ps in p u b l ic an d i s
pu sh ed t o th e b r ink o f sa nit y b ec au s e o f h ow th e y “s ha k e
th e m.
๏ Fo ll o wi ng Re g a n ’s re du c ti o n o f “ h i s t r a in ” to tw e n ty - f iv e
L e ar d e mo ns tr a te s j us t ho w b li nd he is w h e n s u d d e n ly an d
r a the r p at h e tic a l ly h e de c i de s t o li v e w ith Go n e r il w h o s e:
‘f i f ty y e t d o th d ou bl e fi ve a n d t w en t y, | A nd
t hou a rt t w i ce h e r l o ve ’ .
h is re ti nu e o f kn ig ht s fro m a h u ndre d to f i f ty to f in a ll y n on e ,
๏ H is o nl y re ma i n in g d ig n it y i s h is ‘ n ob l e an ge r’ . H e a ttemp ts
to re si st te a r s a n d th ei r c on n ot a ti o n s of w om a n li n es s an d
we a kne ss b u t h e f ai l s.
th ous a nd f l a w s | Or e re [h e ’ ll ] w ee p’ is q u ic k ly b ro k en i n a
pu bl i c a nd d e e pl y hu m i lia ti ng f as hio n .
๏ At t hi s p o in t i n t he p la y, L ea r n ee d s h is F oo l to sh o w h i m
th e t ru th be n e a th t he s ur f ac e o f w h a t i s h ap p e n in g , e ve n
whe n t he d e mo ns t ra ti o n i s be yo nd t he re ac h of w o rd s .
No, you u n n a t u r a l h a g s ,
I w i l l hav e su c h re ve n g e s o n y o u b o t h ,
t hi ngs,—
๏ Ju st be fo re t hi s , th e K ing ut t er s h i s f i r st tr u l y w i se w ord s i n
th e p l ay.
๏ Tau nt ed b y R eg a n a n d Go n er i l ’s re du cti on of hi s k ni gh ts
a nd th ei r que s ti o ni n g o f h i s n ee d f or s u ch a re tin u e , h e
re p l i e s wi t h a d eg re e o f p h i l os op h i ca l de pth th at is simp ly
n ot a pp a re n t e a rl i e r i n th e p l ay :
Oh re a s o n n ot t h e n e e d
our ba se st b e g g a r s
A re i n th e p o ore s t t h in g s u p e r flu o u s :
A l l ow no t n a t u re m o re t h a n n a t u re n e e d s ,
๏ U na bl e to c o nt ro l hi s pa s s i on , h e le av es an d j ou r n ey s i n to
th e s t o rm.
h ero i c a nd t ra g i c, he st ri v e s t o ‘ o u t s c o r n ’ th e e le m en ts .
e ng a g e d in a b a tt l e to de s t roy him .
๏ L ea r c a l l s o n th e “ a ll - s ha kin g th un de r” to ‘ C r ac k n at u re’s
c o rr upt i o n a c tu a l l y i s.
su ffe ri ng c o m b in e d w it h th e re d em p ti ve po w er of Cordelia’s
l ove if h e i s t o b e pu rg e d co m ple te ly of h i s h u b r is.
๏ In t hi s re sp e c t, i t i s i m p or ta nt th a t w e v ie w L e ar ’s su ff er i n g
a s pa rt o f h is j o ur n e y to w a rd s a w a re n es s.
๏ We g a i n a n umb e r o f i n si g h t s in t o j us t h ow m uc h Le ar h as
changed. He has already achieved some progress by
that he is a weak and despised old man and in realising that what
๏ F o l l o w i n g h i s e x p o s u re t o t h e e l e m e n t s , h e b e g i n s t o
c o ns id e r th e ev i l o f h id d en gu i lt , t he w i des pre a d
hypocrisy and injustice apparent in the
in sti tut ions of the s tate .
๏ His urge is now to help the poor and voiceless: “to shake the
๏ At the end of Act three scene six, Edgar is left alone on stage to
King bow.
brought to confront the reality of his situation. The change that his
๏ When we next meet Lear, his anguish has driven him completely
insane. However, in this visionary madness we see how radically his
They flattered
[… ] I am not ague-proof.
tragic:
air,
๏ In his place we meet a humble man who shuns the very court he
once sought to control completely.
๏ Rather than see himself as the centre of court life, Lear is now
content to observe from a “wall’ prison.”
Rashness: H e re I d i s c l a i m a l l my p a t e r n a l c a re
Vi o l e n c e : P ro p i n q u i t y a n d p ro p e r t y o f b l o o d
Barbarous Sc ythian
I nc lu d e c ha r t from o l d h a n d ou t
Better thou
Kingly presence / Blow winds and crac k your c heeks Rage! Blow!
tragic dimensions: Sp out!
Magnitude of his
personality:
S e l f pi t y: H e re I s t a n d a p o o r, i n fi r m , w e a k , d e s p i s e d o l d m a n
Strength I w i l l e n d u re
C o n c e r n e d w i t h H ow d o s t , my b oy ? A r t c o l d ? W h e re i s t h e s t ra w ?
s u ff er i n g o f oth ers
I h a v e o n e p a r t i n my h e a r t
S e l f pi t y: I a m a m a n m o re s i n n e d a g a i n s t t h a n s i n n i n g
Plot
Attempts to Then let them atomise Regan: see what breeds about her heart. Is
understand nature of there any cause in nature that makes these hard-hearts? (Mock
m an an d i n j us ti ce : Trial)
Complains of world's
flattery. Recognises They told me I was ever ything; `tis a lie I am not
v u l n e r a b il i ty a nd a g u e - p ro o f .
frailty of man:
Self recognition / I a m a v e r y fo o l i s h , fo n d o l d m a n
knowledge
Humility I ’ l l k n e e l d ow n A n d a s k o f t h e e fo r g i v e n e s s
Pessimism Why should a dog, a horse, a rat have life And thou no
breath at all?
Kent: His suffering is over He hates him That would upon the rack of this tough world
Stretch him out longer
Kent: Inspired loyalty to the I have a journey Sir, shortly to go My master calls me I
end. must not say no
Cordelia
Act I scene 1
Act II scene 4
Act IV, scene 7
Act V, scene 3
๏ One of the core issues examined in the play is nature and the natural
order and Cordelia is an embodiment of a concept of nature totally
opposed to that of Edmund, Goneril, Regan and Cornwall.
redeems nature from the general curse which twain have brought
her to". And this role is viewed through the lens of Christian
symbolism.
2
๏ In the opening scene, she is despised, rejected and forsaken by
๏ She loves her father "according to [her] bond". When she suggests
that any future husband of hers will enjoy only half her love "half my
care and duty" she is, in truth, professing an extraordinary filial love.
2 Triadic expressions are highly effective because they add emphasis in an aesthetically pleasing manner.
curse".
๏ Goneril states that Lear "always lov'd our sister most" and both she
๏ This is also Kent's opinion: "Thy youngest daughter does not love
thee least;” and even the king of France, a visitor to the court knows
that Cordelia: “[...] even but now was your best object, the
argument of your praise, balm of your age, the best, the dearest”.
๏ Flattery, she feels debases the truth of her actual love for her father.
Sincerity and absolute honesty is a way of life for her.
premonition of what lies in store for Lear: "I would prefer him to a
better place”.
๏ Slowly, painfully but inevitably, Lear begins to see the light. At first,
fault": the truth, however will not be quiet and Lear, with desperation
in his voice, exclaims: "O Lear, Lear, Lear, beat at this gate let thy
confess "I did her wrong". And then Lear eventually recognises
When she hears the full extent of her father's distress, "an ample
tear trilled down her delicate cheek" and "once or twice heaved
๏ Her only concern is her father. All her energies are devoted to the
rescue of Lear.
๏ To this end she is prepared to give all that she possesses. She tells
the doctor: "He that helps him, take all my outward worth".
may be helped: "No blown ambition doth our arms incite but love,
clear love, and our overag'd father's right.” (Her sense of justice)
Gentleman tells Kent that she is like “sunshine and rain at once,
of nature, whose tears can renew and “quicken” the virtue of earth:
"All blest secrets all you unpublish'd virtues of the earth spring
"There she shook the holy water from her heavenly eyes" to
“Shakespeare explores both the destructive and the redemptive power of love throughout the
play, King Lear.”
D i s c u s s t h i s s t a t e m e n t , s u p p o r t i n g y o u r a n s w e r w i t h re f e re n c e t o t h e p l a y.
LC 2016
observes that the King still: "hast one daughter who redeems
loyalty and tells Kent: "O thou good Kent! How shall I live and work
to match thy goodness?” “My life will be too short and every
her.
๏ Lear can only believe that Cordelia has taken him "out o' the grave"
๏ Yet his guilt continues to overpower him. He admits that Cordelia has
done him no wrong and has cause not to love him. She replies with
๏ It is a tearful and tender reunion. When Lear says "I think this lady to
characteristically sorry for him rather than for herself: "For thee
๏ Her words here before spoken just before her death form a powerful
allusion to Christ on the cross.
๏ She has nothing to say in reply to Lear's: "we too alone will sing like
birds in the cage". She realises that his expectation of a joyful life in
๏ Our last thoughts of her are reflected in Lear's words: "Her voice
words and how they can be abused. His cry echoes Cordelia's truth.
Shakespeare makes effective use of Lear’s relationship with Cordelia to shape our
understanding of a number of the play’s core issues.
“Throughout the course of the play, both Lear and Gloucester are tragic
characters, but Lear develops into the more heroic figure.
Leaving Cert 2016
๏ Like Lear, Gloucester is not an evil man and like Lear he grows in
stature throughout the play.
๏ Nothing marks the difference between him and Lear so much as their
first instinctive reactions to Cornwall:
๏ He first appears as the lecherous, sensual man who has fathered the
he was sent for, yet was his mother fair; there was good
acknowledged.”
๏ His casually racy tone clearly indicates to us that he feels little guilt
for his immoral behaviour: "now I am brazd to it" and for the fact
that Edmund's birth has deprived him of the legal inheritance rights
enjoyed by his brother Edgar.
legitimate”
brutish!
and rejection:
๏ He accepts that the scant evidence of the letter and Edmund's word
are enough to condemn his son without a hearing. This is a
fundamental act of injustice.
๏ He accepts the word of a son who "had been out nine years" and
fails to recognise the innocence and virtue of the legitimate and loyal
Edgar. In other words he is as blind to the truth about his own
children as Lear is about his daughters.
๏ His credulity, his superstition and his hasty judgement make him
๏ Here he reaches his lowest point / nadir overcome with self-pity and
3
๏ Whereas Edmund, his son, is hard, contemptuous and masterful,
and the stars, fearing what the future might bring: "These late
3 Triadic expressions are highly effective because they add emphasis in an aesthetically pleasing manner.
love for Edgar: "No father [loved] his son dearer” but what is most
striking is his helplessness in the face of his deepest feelings and his
need and desire to be loved.
๏ And yet despite his deep misgivings he accepts the situation, unlike
Cornwall, Regan and the outraged Lear: "I would have all well
๏ And after such an ineffective protest, he locks the doors on the king,
helpless once again when confronted by strong feelings of cruelty
and the shocking reality of evil.
๏ For Gloucester is not simply a lecher, one who has had too much
altogether.
๏ Though his fears had made him talk of his son being brought to the
stake, he does not, in fact, like violence when he sees it: "Weapons,
arms what's the matter here?" and the punishment of Kent with the
stocks, let alone the stake, also brings out his sympathy and
concern.
When I desired their leave that I might pity him, they took
๏ Here his language now comes closer Kent’s plain-speaking: "I will
courage. The sight of Lear on the heath is too much for the decent
I am your host
done with her word "bond" and as Kent had with "father", "master",
"patron".
stature in our eyes: "I am tied to the stake and I must stand the
course".
๏ Not happy to simply blind him, Goneril and Regan want him to know
just how deeply he has been betrayed:
๏ All he can do is to give away first his “purse” (an act of distributive
very much as he saw the "fiery duke" whose disposition "all the
world well knows will not be rubb'd nor stopp'd". In the end, he
experience.
worst, he now finds that all he knows is Lear's suffering and his own:
๏ His encounter with the mad Lear provokes feelings which are a
mixture of pity and envy - pity for a “ruined piece of nature”, envy of
Burst smilingly"
๏ However, we quickly realise that Edmund does not need the gods to
help him. He is a masterful manipulator and a fine actor, who takes
his father and brother in with disturbing ease. Edmund says himself,
he is adaptable and ready to manipulate events to serve his turn; 'all
with me’s meet / that I can fashion fit'. His ability to adopt the right
tone in any situation helps him in his progress towards power.
๏ He is filled with bitterness and schemes to win himself both rank and
wealth at the expense of his father and his brother, Edgar:
Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land.
✴ But you have to be very careful not to rush to any quick judgement
about Edmund. The beliefs he outlines in Act I Scene ii suggest he
rejects the hierarchy that has made his father and brother so
✴ His influence is divisive. Both Goneril and Regan lust after him and
are pitted against each other because of him. Albany recognises the
threat he poses and after the battle tells him that:
I hold you but a subject of this war,
Not as a brother
Albany orders that Edmund surrender Lear and Cordelia to him as prisoners. It
is a significant moment, because Albany is reminding Edmund of feudal duties
and of his inferior rank.
✴ Most critics are of the opinion that Edmund is redeemed before his
death, that he is transformed by the redemptive power of love. They
believe that once Edmund realises that he was beloved by Goneril
and Regan that he is determined to recant and to save Lear and
Cordelia.
✴ His epiphany seems abrupt and unbelievable, yet within the context
of the play's themes and the emphasis on the need for love, it
✴ However, in the end we must never forget that we must reject him
everything Edmund represents, as we have rejected Goneril and
Regan.
Kent’s Character
๏ Kent first holds our attention with his passionate plea for Lear to
reverse his judgment on Cordelia in Act one, Scene one. He feels
๏ Gloucester describes his fellow Earl as "noble and true hearted" (I,ii,
blank" of Lear's eye, foretelling the disaster which Lear fails to see
(1,1, 158, 163).
๏ But Lear is just barely unable to recognise that Caius was the
disguised Kent, and thus never quite appreciates the great sacrifice
of his labours.
๏ In the end, Albany offers Kent a share in the rule of the kingdom, but
Kent, near death himself, declines in order to follow his master, who
he says calls him on a journey which he cannot refuse (V,iii, 321-322).
๏ The limitations of Kent as Caius, and maybe too of Kent himself, are
exceeded by the excellence of his service.
๏ The Fool criticises the folly of Kent as Caius, but it is never clear that
the Fool knows Caius to be Kent.
๏ His principal motive is the love of Lear. In contrast with the disguise
of Edgar, the disguise of Kent is a shaving off of everything that
๏ De Alvarez states that the disguise of Kent "is not a change of nature
at all, whereas Edgar's disguise seems to be a change of nature."'
๏ When Kent presents himself to Lear and Lear asks him "what art
thou," Kent, abstracting from particulars, answers "a man, sir." He
avoids answering "a Kentish man," or "an earl," and does not lie, for
example by saying "an old soldier." Kent, both as Caius and as Kent,
is frequently called "man" or "a man" in the play, and part of the
question exceeded by the excellence of his service.
๏ The Fool criticises the folly of Kent as Caius, but it is never clear that
the Fool knows Caius to be Kent. The limitations of Kent as Caius are
different from the limitations of Kent as Kent. It may he that Kent
makes errors in his disguised service to Lear, but survives these
errors to learn from them because of his disguise.
near Dover, where he is earl. It is the altered dialect which Kent later
identifies with the plain speaking or bluntness of Caius (II,iv, 90-115).
๏ This plain speech is contrasted both with his parody of the flowery
speech of court flatterers (II,ii, 106-109), which he calls "out" of his
"dialect," and with Kent's own more noble speech, spoken when he
is not in disguise. The best example of this more noble speech
occurs while he is in the stocks (II,ii, 159-173).
๏ When Lear finally asks directly what it is that he wants, and learns
that he wants work serving him, Lear asks, "Dost thou know me,
fellow? Lear is not wearing the crown. Kent answers "No, sir; but you
have that in your countenance / Which I would fain call master."
Asked what that is, Kent answers "authority."
๏ Kent uses the same disguise in the scene of his second fight with
Oswald, at Gloucester in the second act. Edmund and Cornwall break
up the fight. When Cornwall asks Kent what he considers the fault of
The Fool
The Fool in King Lear is one of Shakespeare’s most intriguing characters, playing a crucial
yet often understated role in the development of the tragedy. His function in the play
transcends mere entertainment, as he serves as a truth-teller, social commentator, and a
mirror to King Lear’s folly. The Fool’s unique position allows him to criticise the king without
fear of retribution, offering insight not only into Lear’s descent into madness but also into
broader themes of power, wisdom, and the human condition.
In Shakespearean drama, the Fool often serves as a character who can speak truth to
power, albeit in a veiled or comic manner. While their humour can be light-hearted and
entertaining, Shakespearean fools typically offer deeper insight into the play’s events and
characters. This is particularly true in King Lear, where the Fool assumes the role of Lear’s
conscience, pointing out the king’s mistakes and folly in a way that other characters
cannot.
The Fool is not merely a comic gure in King Lear. Unlike traditional court jesters, he
displays a profound awareness of the events unfolding around him and often expresses
this awareness through sharp wit and biting sarcasm. He is privy to the king’s inner turmoil
and uses his position to reveal truths that Lear is either too proud or too blind to see. As G.
Wilson Knight argues in The Wheel of Fire, the Fool’s role is pivotal in communicating the
play’s essential truths, even though he appears to do so in a light-hearted or comic
fashion.
The Fool has a unique bond with King Lear, one marked by both affection and audacity.
From the outset of the play, the Fool is the only character able to speak frankly to the king,
“Thou hadst little wit in thy bald crown when thou gav’st thy golden one away”
(1.4.155-156).
Here, the Fool uses a metaphor to highlight Lear’s foolishness in giving away his kingdom,
effectively surrendering his authority to his manipulative daughters, Goneril and Regan.
The image of a “bald crown” is not only a comment on Lear’s advancing age but also a
symbol of his diminishing power, contrasting the “golden” crown of kingship with the
foolhardy act of abdication.
Throughout the play, the Fool serves as Lear’s conscience, reminding him of the folly of
his decisions. In Act 1, Scene 5, the Fool speaks again in metaphorical terms:
“I am better than thou art now: I am a fool, thou art nothing” (1.5.38-39).
This statement underscores the reversal of roles that has taken place. While Lear was
once a powerful king, he has now reduced himself to “nothing,” having relinquished his
authority and control. The Fool, by contrast, acknowledges his own role as a fool, but in
doing so, he subtly asserts his superiority over the fallen king. He may be a fool by title,
but Lear, through his actions, has rendered himself powerless and inconsequential.
The Fool’s ability to point out Lear’s mistakes without facing punishment is one of the key
aspects of their relationship. While Kent, Cordelia, and others are punished or exiled for
speaking the truth, the Fool is immune from such repercussions. His jests and riddles,
though biting, are tolerated by Lear because they are veiled in the language of folly.
However, as the play progresses, it becomes clear that the Fool’s words carry a weight
that Lear cannot ignore. The Fool’s observations cut through Lear’s delusions, forcing him
to confront the reality of his situation, even if he is not always ready to accept it.
Shakespeare frequently plays with the notion of “wise folly” in his works, and the Fool in
King Lear is one of the clearest examples of this theme. Despite his status as a fool, he is
arguably one of the wisest characters in the play. His jests and songs are laced with
insight, and his role as a truth-teller is a sharp contrast to the dishonesty and attery of
Lear’s other courtiers.
The prophecy, though delivered in a humorous tone, re ects a deeper truth about the
corruption and moral decay that have overtaken Lear’s kingdom. The Fool’s mention of
“priests” who are “more in word than matter” and “nobles” who are “their tailors’ tutors”
points to the hypocrisy and vanity of the ruling class, while the reference to “great
confusion” foreshadows the chaos that will soon engulf the kingdom. Despite his
seemingly nonsensical speech, the Fool is acutely aware of the social and political
upheaval taking place.
The idea of wisdom in folly is further explored in the Fool’s comment in Act 1, Scene 4:
Here, the Fool laments the inversion of wisdom and folly in the world. Wise men, once
esteemed for their intelligence and insight, have become “foppish” and super cial, unable
to wield their wisdom effectively. The Fool’s commentary here can be seen as a re ection
on Lear’s own descent into folly. Once a wise and respected king, Lear has become foolish
and irrational, casting aside those who truly love him (such as Cordelia) in favour of those
who atter him (Goneril and Regan).
Another interpretation is that the Fool’s disappearance symbolises Lear’s transition from
ignorance to awareness. As Lear begins to confront the reality of his situation and the
consequences of his actions, the Fool’s role as truth-teller becomes less necessary. In a
sense, the Fool has ful lled his purpose, guiding Lear through the initial stages of his
downfall until Lear is ready to face the truth on his own. As Jan Kott notes in Shakespeare
Our Contemporary, the Fool’s departure marks the moment when Lear is left to grapple
with the full weight of his madness and suffering.
There is also a more tragic interpretation of the Fool’s disappearance, one that aligns with
the play’s themes of loss and suffering. In Act 3, Scene 6, Lear famously remarks:
While this line is typically interpreted as referring to Cordelia, some critics suggest that it
may also allude to the Fool’s fate. If the Fool has been hanged, it would underscore the
play’s relentless depiction of loss and injustice, as even the wisest characters are not
spared from the tragic consequences of Lear’s actions.
The Fool plays a signi cant role in the play’s exploration of madness, both as a
commentator on Lear’s mental state and as a character who skirts the boundaries of
madness himself. His jests and riddles, while often insightful, can also be disorienting and
confusing, blurring the line between wisdom and madness. The Fool’s language is
frequently nonsensical, yet it carries a deeper meaning that re ects the chaotic and
irrational world in which the characters nd themselves.
The storm scenes in Acts 3 and 4 are particularly important in this regard. As Lear rages
against the storm, the Fool remains by his side, offering a counterpoint to Lear’s madness.
While Lear’s rantings are wild and uncontrolled, the Fool’s speech, though seemingly mad,
is calculated and purposeful.
In some ways, the Fool’s role in the play mirrors Lear’s own journey into madness. Both
characters use language that is fragmented and disjointed, lled with riddles, puns, and
nonsensical phrases. Yet while Lear’s madness is a result of his psychological and
emotional turmoil, the Fool’s “madness” is a deliberate performance, a way of revealing
uncomfortable truths while maintaining his position at court. This distinction underscores
the play’s exploration of the complexities of human reason and irrationality.
The Fool in King Lear is a character of immense complexity, whose role in the play
extends far beyond comic relief. As Lear’s conscience and truth-teller, the Fool serves as a
commentator on the king’s folly, the corruption of the court, and the broader themes of
madness and wisdom. His sharp wit and biting sarcasm expose the absurdity of the world
around him, offering insight into the human condition while also providing a counterpoint to
the play’s more tragic elements.
Ultimately, the Fool’s disappearance from the play is as enigmatic as his character itself,
leaving audiences to ponder the signi cance of his role and the reasons for his exit.
Whether seen as a symbol of wisdom in folly, a re ection of Lear’s own descent into
madness, or a victim of the play’s tragic events, the Fool remains one of Shakespeare’s
most memorable and thought-provoking creations.
The play would be diminished without the important dramatic roles played by
the Fool and Kent
๏ The sub-plot of “King Lear” both explicates and reinforces the thematic
concerns of the play. Both Gloucester and Lear are victims of lial ingratitude.
๏ However these parallels are not con ned to Gloucester and Lear. Cordelia’s
innate goodness is re ected in Edgar, while Goneril and Regan’s cold and
calculating callous natures are mirrored by Edmund.
๏ The tragic dimensions of Lear’s character are placed into greater relief by the
circumstances of Gloucester’s journey.
๏ The play’s core issues are re ected in both plots. Both men are destroyed,
physically and guratively by their offspring; yet ironically, it is the suffering
caused by this lial ingratitude that leads Lear and Gloucester to redemption,
forgiveness, and true insight into the human condition.
๏ As the play unfolds, the hubris and foolish naivety of both men lead to their
downfalls.
๏ However, it is only after they suffer that they nally appreciate the extent of their
sins.
๏ As the play opens, we see that Lear is a man who has little or no understanding
of some of the most fundamental aspects of the human condition.
๏ This is perhaps most clearly seen in one of the play’s most signi cant events:
The Love Test. As he blindly accepts the bland sycophancy of Goneril and
Regan over the honesty of his daughter Cordelia, we can see that Lear is
deeply awed.
๏ He is blind to the true nature of what love really means. This test debases love
and reduces it to a crass, nancial transaction where the empty rhetoric of
Goneril and Regan is rewarded.
๏ This decision also reveals to us that Lear simply does not know his daughters.
๏ In fact, his immediate response to Edmund’s allegations is not only naïve and
unreasonable, it is, much like Lear’s desire to hold a love test, utterly irrational:
๏ Much like Gloucester, Lear publicly disavows the “paternal care,” he owes
Cordelia. He denies any “propinquity and property of blood” that exist
between him and his daughter.
๏ In a manner that recalls Gloucester’s decision to “bar” the ports and “proclaim”
Edmund, Lear makes the irrational choice to hold her as “a stranger to his
heart.”
๏ The implications of these decisions are many. As a result of what they do both
men place themselves at the mercy of people who wish to destroy them.
๏ Gloucester’s gullibility and quick temper recall Lear’s naivety and ‘wrath’.
๏ In fact, it is remarkable to think that two such accomplished old men could be so
foolish.
๏ However, they are foolish and as a result, their ambitious cold hearted children
shamelessly exploit and punish their respective weaknesses.
๏ The lial disloyalty exhibited by Goneril, Regan and Edmund in this play is
shocking.
๏ Goneril and Regan launch a premeditated and sustained attack on their father’s
sense of himself as King.
๏ They reduce his “train of knights” and in the process his sense of his own
majesty. And when Lear pleads with Goneril she replies:
Be then desir'd
By her that else will take the thing she begs
A little to disquantity your train.
๏ A little later, Regan utters some of the most calculated and callous words in the
play:
๏ For his part, the old king begins to realise that it was he who put power into the
hands of his tormenters. ‘I gave you all’ he says, to which Regan replies coldly
‘and in good time you gave it.’
๏ We gain a number of profound insights into Goneril, Regan and Edmund from
how they treat their parents.
๏ We learn that Lear’s daughters are opportunists, willing to exploit their father’s
weaknesses to gain more for themselves. They have no shame in anything they
do.
๏ Evil is one of the play’s most interesting thematic and philosophical concerns /
core issues. And the behaviour of these children leads us to draw a number of
disturbing conclusions about evil.
๏ In the rst instance we learn that evil characters take pleasure from in icting
pain and tormenting their enemies.
๏ We see this most clearly during the torture of Gloucester where Regan and
Cornwall outdo each other in cruelty.
๏ When Cornwall orders this servants to “hold the chair” while he sets his “foot"
on the old man’s “eyes,” Regan’s justi cation for removing the other eye is
apparent in her mocking cruelty:
๏ Their callous indifference to the pain that they have in icted is revealed in
Cornwall’s fascination with the composition and appearance of Gloucester’s
mutilated eye:
๏ This is mirrored in their decision “to thrust him out at gates, and let him smell
His way to Dover.”
๏ For his part, Edmund’s attitude to his father vividly mirrors that of the two
sisters.
๏ Although Gloucester is foolish in con ding in Edmund, the ease with which
Edmund betrays his father is astonishing.
๏ He has no reservations about putting his father’s life at risk. Yet, just as with
Lear’s two daughters, Edmund cares about little except gaining power for
himself.
๏ With total satisfaction he proclaims that: ‘the younger rises when the old doth
fall’. This view of the natural order provides us with a further insight into
Shakespeare’s vision of evil. Namely, evil is destructive, inherently chaotic and
runs contrary to civilised society.
๏ ③ ➠ In Goneril and Regan’s view of the world, nature plays an important part;
Shakespeare associates numerous references to nature in the play with this
pair.
๏ Goneril is a ‘kite’; her ingratitude has a ‘serpent’s tooth’: she strikes her father
most ‘serpent-like upon the very heart’.
๏ In Lear’s eyes, her ‘visage is wol sh’ and she has tied ‘sharp-toothed
unkindness like a vulture’ on her father's breast.
๏ ④ ➠ What makes all these images so effective is the manner in which they
simultaneously highlight various aspects of Goneril’s personality and
Shakespeare’s vision of evil.
๏ Early on in the play, Edmund becomes the mouthpiece for this vision of
unbridled animal ambition when he tells us that:
๏ Nature provides the evil characters in the play with the freedom they hunger for,
it absolves them from the ‘plague of custom’, it justi es their vicious and
vindictive actions.
๏ They rely con dently on certain simple facts of nature: that they are young and
their father “old,” strong while he is in rm, and that their youth and nally that
their strength give them licence to ful l their desires however harmful those
desires may be.
๏ One of the most disturbing insights we gain into just how dangerous evil is
emerges from their behaviour. They believe that having the power to do
something is same thing as having the right to do it.
๏ In both the plot and the subplot, it is this horri c lial ingratitude, born of a
destructive and malicious vision of nature that leads to such immense suffering.
๏ And as Lear is consumed by madness on the heath, we begin to see that, this
suffering is a necessary prerequisite for his journey towards enlightenment.
๏ As soon as he is cast out into the wild and left to fend for himself against the
cruel elements, we witness a transformation in Lear’s outlook.
๏ Gone is the arrogant self-important tyrant of the opening scene. In his place we
see a pathetic, broken man, consumed by insanity and haunted by the
memory of his daughters’ rejection.
๏ Although Lear’s tragedy may be traced back to his own foolish and impetuous
behaviour in Act one, the degree to which he suffers is disproportionate to the
sins he has committed. He is “a man more sinned against than sinning.”
Leaving Cert 2016 “Throughout the course of the play, both Lear and Gloucester are
tragic characters, but Lear develops into the more heroic gure.”
➠ To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Support your answer with reference to the play, King Lear.
๏ When Gloucester stumbles out onto the heath with no eyes, we can
immediately see that, like Lear, he has become more considerate, more
compassionate and consequently a better person.
๏ When one of his vassals offers him help, Gloucester responds with humility and
compassion telling the man:
๏ Like Lear, his compassion and altruism are closely connected to his suffering.
๏ In the nal acts of the play, both Gloucester and Lear are redeemed, through
the love of their respective children Edgar and Cordelia.
๏ When Edgar encounters his father on the heath with blood streaming down his
face and no eyes, he is lled with compassion for the man that ‘proclaimed’
him and threatened to kill him.
๏ ‘Bless thy sweet eyes’ he says, shocked and appalled at the state of his
broken and battered father.
๏ He immediately forgives him for all his sins and says: ‘give me thy arm, poor
Tom shall lead thee’.
๏ Edgar’s kindness and empathy for his old father is touching. As he lovingly
leads the suffering Gloucester to Dover, Edgar does his best to restore not only
the old man’s dignity but also his belief in the gods.
๏ When Gloucester tries to kill himself, Edgar goes to great lengths to make it
appear that the gods saved him from death.
๏ And by doing so, he convinces his father that he was wrong in his belief that
humankind is little more than ‘ ies to wanton boys’, that ‘kill us for their
sport’.
ⓒ Cian Hogan English Notes 2025 77
fi
fi
fl
fl
๏ At the end of the play, we learn that when Edgar revealed his identity to
Gloucester the latter died: ‘twixt two extremes of passion, joy and grief.’
๏ Finally, the old man is liberated from his painful life, and he dies redeemed.
๏ Similarly, Cordelia receives her father with the very same compassion and
forgiveness that Edgar has shown his Gloucester.
๏ She realises the true nature of the harm that has been done to Lear and
attempts in a conscious and deliberate fashion to restore his dignity.
๏ If Goneril and Regan’s attack on Lear had been calculated to emasculate him
and reduce his sense of himself as regent, then Cordelia attempts to undo this.
๏ She refers to him with deference and respect. She clothes him in regal attire
and asks him to hold his hand in ‘benediction’ over her.
๏ As a result, Lear is a changed man whose enormous hubris, pride and ego
have been purged by suffering.
Identify aspects of Shakespeare’s play, King Lear, that, in your opinion, lead us to draw
profound conclusions about su ering. Discuss the disturbing conclusions that may be drawn
about this subject from the aspects of the play you have identi ed. Support your answer with
reference to the text.
๏ However, just as Edgar saves Gloucester, it is Cordelia’s love that redeems Lear. He
now understands that real love is more than attery.
๏ Their re-union is, for him, a natural bond that has been restored:
he that parts us shall bring
a brand from heaven.
This is why her death devastates him and plunges him into despair:
thou’lt come no more,
๏ To him it must seem like the death of order and harmony, and the death of love itself.
As a result, like Gloucester, his ‘ awed heart’ gives way.
๏ Thematically both the subplot and plot have a great deal in common.
Imagery
Fascinating
➡ Animal imagery is used throughout the play. At times it lays emphasis to the
chaos that Lear has created by renouncing the throne.
➡ Images that evoke the: stalking, creeping, crawling, slithering world of animals,
insects, and the more repulsive “monsters of the deep” dominate the language
of the play.
① ➠ Throughout play Shakespeare deepens our understanding of Lear’s struggle with his
daughters. ② ➠ And in order to do so, he relies heavily on animal imagery to express
Lear’s feelings of anger, rejection, indignation, wrath, and vengeance.
๏ When Oswald reminds Lear that he is no longer the King and is now
merely his ‘lady's father,’ Lear’s indignation is spurred, and the imagery
becomes more intense.
He calls Oswald a ‘whoreson dog’ and ‘cur’. In fact, in the course of the play,
๏
Oswald is frequently dehumanised by being likened variously to: a ‘rat’, a ‘dog’
and a ‘goose’.
๏ The imagery implied in the verb ‘bit off’ is by transference an image of human
decapitation and a darkly prophetic foreshadowing of what Lear is to experience
from his children.
๏ In this image is implicit the lack of lial gratitude, love and even
common humanity which are already in fact Lear's destiny.
๏ The image is so apt because, even though Lear seems to ignore it, it
succeeds immediately in capturing the full tragic intensity of his situation.
๏
๏
๏ As Lear becomes irritated by Oswald and shocked by the callousness of
Goneril, who demands he give up his knights, the imagery changes so
as to match his emotional state.
๏ A kite is a falcon-like bird which preys on small quarry. The analogy is clear;
Goneril has decided to prey on Lear who has been weakened by his loss of
power.
๏ Shifting from the image of the “kite,” Lear’s anger intensi es. His frustration and
rage, which seethe in him against Goneril, reach their climax when he curses
her by praying to nature to make her sterile and by capturing his rising
obsession with “ingratitude” in the image of a ‘serpent's tooth’.
๏ He speaks of her ‘wolvish visage’ and likens her to a ‘she fox’. These angry
images blend with his passionate desire for vengeance / justice, when he states
that Regan will ‘ ay’ Goneril's face when she learns of her sister’s ingratitude.
➡ Once he has ed to his ‘Beloved Regan’, Lear re ects upon the love and
generosity that he has shown his daughters and upon the unnatural ingratitude
shown him by Goneril in return.
➡ The image that he uses to describe his sense of shock and outraged paternal
affection takes the form of ‘sharp-toothed unkindness’, which like a ‘vulture’,
tears at his heart.
➡ In his rising anger at Regan's rejection of his grievances and her demand that
he ask Goneril's forgiveness and return instead to her, Lear reacts by claiming
that a serpent's tongue has “struck” him to his heart.
➡ Imagery linked to the wounding of the King’s heart by vultures and serpents
➡ Lear reacts to Regan's rejection of him, by refusing her demand to dismiss fty
of his knights and by his determination, instead, to: ‘abjure all roofs and be a
comrade with the wolf and the owl’.
➡ So, when Lear insists that he would rather be out in the storm, his wish is
granted with callous zeal and the doors to Gloucester’s castle are shut.
②➠ Supporting Statement
Through a series of dehumanising comparisons, Shakespeare uses animal imagery to
illustrate Lear’s growing anguish, his daughters’ cruelty, and his increasing alienation from
the natural order. The imagery evolves alongside Lear’s emotional state, becoming darker
and more intense as the play unfolds.
As the tension rises, the Fool provides a bitter commentary on Lear’s situation through the
image of a hedge-sparrow feeding a cuckoo only to have its head bitten off. The verb “bit
off” foreshadows the decapitation of Lear’s dignity and power by his ungrateful daughters.
This crude yet vivid image encapsulates Lear’s foolishness, his inability to see the true
nature of his children, and the tragic consequences of his misjudgements.
The imagery becomes even more visceral when Lear reacts to Goneril’s demand that he
give up his knights. In his eyes, Goneril transforms into a “degenerate bastard,” a “hideous
sea monster,” and a “detested kite.” The kite, a bird of prey, symbolises Goneril’s predatory
nature as she exploits Lear’s vulnerability. Lear’s rage culminates in the image of a
“serpent’s tooth,” which conveys the pain of lial ingratitude and the sting of betrayal. His
use of “wolvish visage” and “she fox” further extends the depiction of Goneril’s cruelty and
cunning, blending his anger with his desire for vengeance.
④ ➠ Causal Statement
What makes these images so compelling is their ability to capture both Lear’s internal
anguish and the external chaos surrounding him. The progression of animal imagery
re ects the escalating intensity of Lear’s emotions and the moral corruption of the world he
inhabits. For example, the vulture-like “sharp-toothed unkindness” that tears at Lear’s
heart vividly conveys the depth of his grief and his realisation of the unnatural ingratitude
shown by his daughters. Similarly, the serpent’s tongue that strikes him to the heart
highlights the devastating betrayal Lear experiences from Regan.
⑤ ➠ Overview
Through the powerful use of animal imagery, Shakespeare captures the moral and
emotional collapse of Lear’s world. These images not only re ect Lear’s suffering but also
highlight the cruelty and ingratitude of his daughters, the erosion of natural order, and the
Discuss how Shakespeare’s use of language, including imagery, plays an important part in
developing our understanding of one of the following aspects of his play, King Lear: themes;
characterisation; setting and atmosphere. Develop your answer with reference to the text.
Macbeth 2019
③+④➠
Shakespeare takes the greatest of care to prepare us for the storm scene in the Third Act.
At the conclusion of the Second Act there are several references to its approach:
Gloucester: Alack, the night comes on, and the bleak winds
Do sorely ruf e. For many miles about
There's scarce a bush.
๏ According to The Gentleman, the stormy night into which Lear has retreated, is
one from which the ‘cub-drawn bear’, ‘the lion’, and the ‘belly-pinched wolf’
would ee.
๏ Contending with the ‘fretful elements’, tearing his at his hair and striving to
‘out-scorn the con icting wind and rain’, Lear is pursued by his ‘heart-
struck injuries’.
๏ The “belly pinched wolf”, a symbol of greed, and “the owl,” which in this play
acts a symbol of malevolence, are the evil companions the king expects to meet
on the heath.
๏ The truth is that even the most irrational animals have left the “barren heath” to
seek protection, while the king, ‘unbonneted’, and abandoned by every
creature, stands alone against animal nature, human nature, and, as he
discovers, cosmic nature, accompanied only by the Fool and his needling
wisdom.
๏ Battling with the elements, Lear pits himself against the storm. He echoes it and
de es it and in the process he becomes the very image of it.
๏ And during this crucial moment in the play’s development, Lear is completely at
one with the raging tempest.
๏ Finally, the violent storm demonstrates the awesome power of nature, which
seems to cry out against the events of the play.
๏ to appreciate
Don’t forget that Lear’s battle with the storm helps us
In the play King Lear, Shakespeare relies on a number of interesting techniques to convey
to us the tragic and heroic dimensions of Lear’s character.
๏ Its turbulence forces the powerless king to recognise his own mortality and
human frailty and to at last develop a sense of humility.4
๏ Lear sees the storm as having conspired with his ‘pernicious daughters’ to join
their battle against a head so old and white as his.
๏ Later in the scene, the Fool employs the image of the ‘louse’, a small, wingless,
blood-sucking insect to provide us with a concrete example of the contrast
between Lear's powerless state and the power his daughters now hold over
him.
➡ When Lear meets Edgar disguised as Poor Tom he is certain that nothing could
have subdued nature to such a lowly state but his ‘unkind daughters’.
➡ Expressive of this, and linking Edgar's condition with Lear’s abject state on the
stormy heath, are the images employed by Edgar // Poor Tom when he
describes himself as being:
Ha! here's three on's us are sophisticated! Thou are the thing itself: unaccommodated man
is no more but such a poor, bare, forked animal as thou art. Off, off, you lendings!
➡ Bereft of reason, mad, tearing off his clothes (in themselves a really important
symbol / image in the play), Lear is now little better than the beasts.
➡ He has reached the very bottom, which for the past two acts, so much of the
imagery foreshadowed.
➡ Both Gloucester and Lear suffer from an inability to see the truth of their
situations.
➡ It is not until Gloucester actually loses his eyes and Lear loses his mind that
they begin to truly “see”.
➡ The words “eye”, “sight”, and “see” are used repeatedly through the play. It is
only tting that they meet near Dover toward the end of the play and
commiserate about how their blindness has cost them dearly: “If thou would
weep my fortunes, take my eyes,” says Lear.
➡ Animal imagery is used once again, but this time it is employed to describe
Lear’s newfound sense of wisdom:
Blended with this newly gained insight is a critical bitterness that acknowledges the
corruption of the world.
➡ His reaction against the injustice of Cordelia's death and the needless waste of
goodness in the world is expressed once again in animal imagery:
1. Broad Statement
One of the most important imagery patterns in King Lear is that of the storm. The storm is
not merely a backdrop; it is a central, multi-layered symbol that shapes our understanding
of Lear’s tragic progress.
2. Supporting Statement
The storm functions on several levels: it mirrors Lear’s inner turmoil, symbolises the chaos
in the kingdom, foreshadows his descent into madness, and re ects the awesome,
uncontrollable power of nature. Shakespeare carefully prepares us for the storm, ensuring
its symbolic resonance is deeply felt.
This preparation continues in Act III, Scene i, where the Gentleman vividly describes the
storm’s ferocity. His account introduces the wildness of the night and anticipates the
animal imagery that will dominate the storm scenes. He speaks of how even the “cub-
drawn bear,” “the lion,” and the “belly-pinched wolf” would ee from such weather. These
animals, typically symbols of strength, ferocity, and hunger, are now reduced to fear,
highlighting the storm’s overwhelming power.
Lear, however, does not retreat like these creatures. Instead, he stands alone on the
barren heath, unprotected and abandoned. Battling the “fretful elements,” tearing at his
hair, and striving to “out-scorn the con icting wind and rain,” Lear becomes one with the
storm. He is no longer a detached observer; he embodies its raging force. His de ance
against the tempest mirrors his battle against the forces of betrayal, loss, and cosmic
injustice.
4. Causal Statement
The storm’s imagery is pivotal because it works on multiple symbolic levels. First, it re ects
the state of Lear’s kingdom. Just as the tempest wreaks havoc on the land, the kingdom is
Second, the storm foreshadows Lear’s madness and mirrors his internal confusion. Lear’s
wild de ance against the elements symbolises his inability to control the forces within and
around him. He is possessed by the storm, becoming its dramatic embodiment, which
heightens our understanding of his psychological breakdown.
Finally, the storm underscores the awesome power of nature, which seems to cry out
against the events of the play. It dwarfs human concerns, reminding us of the fragility of
man against the forces of the natural and cosmic world. Lear’s isolation during the storm—
abandoned by his daughters and society—underscores his vulnerability and deepens the
tragic dimensions of his character.
Lear’s de ance of the storm and his immersion in its violence elevate him to a heroic
dimension. By battling with the elements, he demonstrates a raw, primal courage that
commands our respect and pity. His struggle is not merely physical but symbolic of his
ght against the betrayals and injustices that have stripped him of everything.
5. Overview
The storm in King Lear is a masterful symbol that operates on multiple levels. It re ects the
political chaos of the kingdom, foreshadows Lear’s madness, and highlights the
overwhelming power of nature. Through vivid animal imagery and Lear’s de ance against
the tempest, Shakespeare portrays the king’s tragic journey with stunning intensity. The
storm ultimately helps us to see Lear as a gure of immense complexity, embodying both
the depths of human vulnerability and the heights of heroic resilience.
The most modern character is the play is probably Edmund. A bastard child
who stands ‘in the plague of custom’ and lacks conventional identity, he resents the
curiosity of nations that deprives him of title and lands – why brand they us with ‘base’?
with ‘baseness’? ‘bastardy’? Edmund is the villain of the play, a man who revolts against
‘the holy cords’ of family relationships and sets out to destroy his father and his
brother, ‘Legitimate Edgar, I must have your land’. Edmund is ambitious, and in the
Elizabethan world where the Chain of Being asser ts a Divine order of hierarchy, his
ambition is viewed suspiciously. However, for the modern audience, he is merely a
determined and ruthless individual intent on achieving his materialistic goals. His duping
of the vir tuous and trusting Edgar, by deviously inventing a conspiratorial letter that
suggests a plot to harm their father Gloucester, is a wonderful piece of mischief.
Edmund sneers at the ‘excellent fopper y of the world’ and takes as much delight in the
cleverness of his scheming as the audience does in watching its execution. There is an
element of the thriller in his machinations. His schemes are both simple and
outrageous for their outlandishness and one cannot help be appalled and yet dazzled
by the way in which he manipulates the trust of the people who love him. He tells
Gloucester that the letter must be ‘an essay or taste of my vir tue’ from Edgar and that
he ‘found it thrown in the casement of my closet’. At once, he insidiously complements
the feelings in the letter by attributing adverse comments about Gloucester’s age to
What would also grip and shock a modern audience, no less than an
Elizabethan audience, is that a child could so deceive a parent and be so calculating and
unfeeling towards a sibling – ‘here he stood in the dark….mumbling of wicked charms’.
When Edmund’s scheming reaches its zenith with his betrayal of Gloucester to
Cornwall and Regan, resulting in the most horrendous tor ture and blinding of his
natural father- ‘He that will think to live till he be old/ Give me some help! – O cruel!
O you gods! ‘- even his ambition and his sense of impoverishment cannot excuse such
wickedness. His actions are not only mercenar y and mendacious but are also evil. They
go against the laws of nature. Gloucester’s pathetic and misguided cries for Edmund’s
help – ‘Edmund, enkindle all the sparks of nature/to quit this horrid act’ – are incredibly
poignant, and his suffering is intensified to breaking point when he learns the truth, O,
my follies! Then Edgar was abused! Such incredibly intense and dramatic scenes would
move any audience. However, in an age where we have become used to news repor ts
about horrors committed in wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, and almost inured to the
repor ts of killings by criminals on our streets, the terror and evil depicted in this scene
would once again reveal the human cost of such ruthlessness.
Of course, the focus of the play is Lear, a man more sinn’d against than sinning.
Gloucester’s stor y is merely the mirror of Lear’s. Just as Gloucester’s life is ripped apar t
by a callous and scheming child, so too Lear is destroyed not only by his own
arrogance and vanity but also by ungrateful, and unscrupulous children, Goneril and
Regan. The play is about family disintegration and about ageism, something that is as
fascinating and compelling today as it was in Shakespeare’s time. ‘Monster ingratitude’
lies at the hear t of it. Glopucester and Lear have been neglectful fathers, how else
could one explain the lack of genuine feeling that their children display. Lear’s older
daughters cannot wait to get him out of the way, regarding him as old and in the way,
‘tis the infirmity of his age’. At a time when our own government attempted to take
As the plot progresses, there are more and more strands added to the plot,
just as we find in modern film and television. The domestic scenes between Goneril and
Albany, for example, are cer tainly quite contemporar y in their depiction of a marriage
in a state of collapse. Albany and Goneril no longer share a common vision and she is
attracted to someone else, Edmund (To thee a woman’s ser vices are due;/ My fool
usurps my bed). The arguments between Albany and Goneril are filled with tension and
acrimony. Goneril refers to him as a Milk-livered man….who hast not in thy brows an
eye discerning /Thine honour from thy suffering. Her contempt for her husband is
The play then, will appeal to the intelligence of the modern audience. It is a
play of intrigue and scheming. But it is also a play with a good deal of action. Kent
attacks Oswald for his insulting of the king, and later in the play Edgar defends his
father against the immoral Oswald and slays him. Edgar eventually fights Edmund in a
duel about honour, Goneril poisons Regan, and kills herself rather than face justice (the
laws are mine not thine), Coredlia is hanged and Kent is tor tured in the most
monstrous fashion. It is a play where people pay dearly for their mistakes and for their
wickedness.
However, at the hear t of the play is a wonderful por trait of love and the
essential goodness that lies at the core of human nature. Characters such as Kent, the
Fool, Edgar, and Cordelia are vir tuous and loyal, even when confronted by criticism or
abuse. Cordelia personifies love. In contrast to her sisters, she is genuinely devoted to
her father but lacks that glib and oily ar t that Regan and Goneril use to fool Lear, and
admits that her love is more ponderous than my tongue and that she cannot heave my
hear t into my mouth. Even while Lear listens to Goneril and Regan profess their love
for him, we – like Kent – watch in horror, recognizing the injustice and folly, the hideous
rashness, that sets the train of disastrous events into motion.
Cordelia’s eventual return and reconciliation with Lear is, then, in the context
of these events remarkable. The scene where she forgives him his mistakes is incredibly
poignant. Before Lear wakes from his sleep, she remarks on the suffering he has had to
Yet there is nothing sentimental about Shakespeare’s vision. The play’s ending is
a challenge to modern audiences, just as it was to the Elizabethans. Politically, Albany
wrestles power from Edmund and Goneril, confronting them with their conspiracy to
kill him. In terms of the presence of power and evil in world, there is the Captain’s
senseless hanging of Cordelia because he is worried about advancing in his career, and
finally there is the death of Lear from a broken hear t Why should a dog, a horse, a rat
have life,/And thou no breath at all? When Albany says The oldest hath borne most;
we that are young/Shall never see so much, nor live so long, he draws attention to the
suffering at the hear t of the play and to how the play has been a drama about the
tensions and struggles between the young and the old. These are universal themes.
They are themes that focus on the tensions between generations: the old unwilling to
let go of power and position, and the young in a hurr y to possess it; the young
disrespectful of the wisdom that accompanies age, and the old often arrogant in their
unwillingness to listen to advice.
King Lear contains all of this and more! It is a play with recognisable characters
caught in situations as relevant today as they were in Elizabethan times.
ANIMAL IMAGERY
Animal imagery is used throughout the play. Images that evoke the stalking,
creeping, crawling, slithering world of animals, insects, and the more repulsive
monsters of the deep dominate the language of the play. Animal imagery is
frequently used by Shakespeare to lay emphasis on the chaos that Lear has
Images associated with lower animals, which suggest the moral derangement
of the world, first insert themselves into the play’s language when Lear arrives
at Goneril’s castle. When Oswald neglects to answer Lear's question as to the
whereabouts of his daughter, we witness a calculated attempt to remind Lear of
his place in the new world order. This breach of decorum, respect and
reverence for authority stirs a mild resentment in the King and is the first stage
of the emotional turmoil which causes him to go mad. His resentment and,
perhaps, contempt, are expressed in the bitter epithet ‘mongrel’. When Oswald
reminds Lear that he is no longer the King, and is now merely his ‘lady's
father’, Lear's indignation is spurred, and the animal imagery becomes more
intense. He calls Oswald a ‘whoreson dog’ and ‘cur’. In fact, in the course of
and a darkly prophetic forewarning of what Lear will experience from his
children. The image makes implicit the lack of gratitude, love and even
common humanity which lie in store for Lear. There is a perfect irony to the fact
that, although Lear is blind to what this image represents, it succeeds
nevertheless in capturing perfectly his tragic situation. As Lear grows
increasingly emotional, infuriated by Oswald and shocked by the callousness of
Goneril, who demands that he be shorn of his knights, the imagery changes to
match his emotional state. He screams his indignation and his anger at the filial
eyes, she has become a ‘hideous seamonster’ and a ‘detested kite’. A kite is a
falcon-like bird which preys on small quarry. The analogy is clear; Goneril has
decided to prey on Lear who has been weakened by his loss of power. Shifting
from the image of the kite, Lear’s anger intensifies. His frustration and rage,
which seethe in him against Goneril, reach their climax when he curses her by
praying to nature to make her sterile and by objectifying his rising obsession
the animal world. He speaks of her ‘wolvish visage’ and likens her to a ‘fox’.
These angry images blend with his passionate desire for vengeance. He
promises that when Regan hears of this she will ‘flay’ Goneril's face. The Fool
Once he has fled to his ‘[b]eloved Regan’, Lear reflects upon the love
and generosity that he has shown his daughters and upon the unnatural
ingratitude paid to him by Goneril in return. The image that he uses to describe
his sense of shock and outraged paternal affection appears in the form of
rising anger at Regan's rejection of his grievances, and her demand that he ask
Goneril's forgiveness and return instead to her, Lear reacts by claiming that a
serpent's tongue has struck him to his heart. Imagery linked to the wounding of
the King’s heart by vultures and serpents marks a crisis in the rising action of
the play. As the animal imagery gathers in intensity it is as if we are being
prepared for the storm that is about to break. Lear reacts to Regan's rejection
of him, by refusing her demand to dismiss fifty of his knights and by his
determination, instead, to ‘abjure all roofs and be a comrade with the wolf and
the owl’.
THE STORM
previous rejection scene is one from which the ‘cub-drawn bear’, ‘the lion’, and
the ‘belly-pinched wolf’ would flee. Contending with the ‘fretful elements’,
tearing his hair and striving to ‘out-scorn the conflicting wind and rain’ Lear is
pursued by his ‘heart-struck injuries’. The wolf, a symbol of greed, and the owl,
Later in the scene, the fool employs the imagery of the ‘louse’, a small,
the elements. Lear sees the storm as having conspired with his ‘pernicious
daughters’ to join their battle against so old and white a head as his. The
IMAGES OF DEHUMANISATION
daughters’. Expressive of this, and linking Edgar's state with Lear’s madness
When he recognises in Edgar the natural state of mankind the process of Lear’s
descent into a basic state is complete:
Bereft of reason, mad, tearing at his clothes, Lear is now little better than a
beast. He has reached a state of dehumanisation which, for the past two acts,
the play’s imagery has prefigured.
When Lear appears at Dover mad, ‘fantastically dressed with wild flowers’,
some of the imagery he uses (drawn from an array of human and animal
The sub-plot concerning Gloucester and his two sons is not a mere duplication
of Lear's story. Shakespeare did not need to repeat himself. The Lear story is intense
and universal in itself and the similarities between the two stories ought not to
distract from the differences.
The sub-plot is complementary to the main plot. It involves physical as
opposed to mental suffering. Thus we view the body and soul of man and
complements, but universalises the main theme so that we watch both the ordinary
man and the extraordinary man; the passive victim and the active participators.
All the Lear effects are exaggerated in the Gloucester theme. The Gloucester
theme has a beginning, even more fantastic than the Lear theme. Edmund's plot
is more devilish and intentional than Goneril and Regan's icy callousness, Edmund is a
The themes run separately but parallel. Our imaginations are aroused by the grotesque
in the Gloucester plot and prepare us to sympathise with Lear. The Gloucester plot
understand and feel the enduring agony of Lear. The horrors of physical torment are
paralleled by the subtle mental torment; the mock suicide flows as a tributary
to the main-stream of our sympathy towards Lear.
Having witnessed Old Gloucester falling from his kneeling posture, a few inches
flat, face foremost instead of from the dizzy heights of the cliffs of Dover, we are
ready to witness the fantastically horrible, which is the agony of Lear's mind.
Lear utters wild and whirling words of madness. Sometimes his words hold profound
meaning. Often they are purely ridiculous. It is certainly just as well that we have
"Look, look a mouse! Peace, peace; This piece of toasted cheese will do 1".
Other Similarities
There are other correspondences in the play besides that between Lear and
Gloucester.
Lear has all daughters, Gloucester has sons. Shakespeare is concerned not
only with the rivalries between fathers and their children, but also with the
The king who is foolish is confronted again and again by the Fool who is wise,
there is a father who goes mad and a son who only pretends to go mad. They
too are brought face to face. At times they vaguely resemble each other: Lear
bedraggled by the storm or bedecked with weeds reminds us Edgar disguised
as Tom.
Moreover there are two men in disguise: Kent and Edgar. The hypocrites in the
play, Goneril, Regan and Edmund disguise their loyalties, but Kent and Edgar
disguise themselves in order to remain loyal.
Correspondences like these are characteristic of Shakespeare's plots. He
repeats situations and relationships in the same way that he repeats
metaphors.
2 01 0
I. “In K ing Le ar honour and loyalty tr iumph over br utality and
viciousness.”
OR
II. “In K ing Le ar the villainous char acter s hold more fascination for
the audience than the vir tuous ones.”
D i s c u s s t h i s s t a t e m e n t w i t h r e fe r e n c e t o a t l e a s t o n e v i l l a i n o u s
and one vir tuous char acter. Suppor t your answer with suitable
I. “In the play, Ki ng Lear, th e stor ies of L ear an d G lou cester mir ror
one another in i nt eres t ing way s.”
OR
Wr ite a response to this view, suppor ting the points you make
by referen ce to th e text.
2 00 1
I. What, in your view, are the most impor tant changes that take
place in the char acter of Lear dur ing the play, Ki n g L e a r?
1 99 7
D i s c u s s t h i s s t a t e m e n t , s u p p o r t i n g yo u r a n s we r by q u o t a t i o n
f r o m o r r e fe r e n c e t o t h e p l ay.
OR
D i s c u s s t h i s s t a t e m e n t , s u p p o r t i n g yo u r a n s we r by q u o t a t i o n
f r o m o r r e fe r e n c e t o t h e p l ay.
1 99 3
D i s c u s s t h i s v i e w, s u p p o r t i n g yo u r a n s we r by r e fe r e n c e o r
quotation from the play.
ⓒ Cian Hogan English Notes 2025 106
OR
II. “E vil is vivid ly a nd fr ig hte n ing ly d epi c ted in t h e p l ay K i n g L e a r.”
D i s c u s s t h i s v i e w, s u p p o r t i n g yo u r a n s we r by r e fe r e n c e o r
quotation from the play.
1 98 9
Or
II.
“In the cou r s e o f the p lay L ea r e mb ar k s on a ha r r ow ing jour n e y
through suffer ing to self knowledge . At the end he is a better
and wiser man.” Discuss this view, suppor ting your answer by
re fer ence or q uo tat io n f ro m t he p lay.
1 98 5