Scribd
Upload
31 views1 page

Grade 9-12

The GSL MUN Screening Rubric evaluates research focus based on five criteria: Country & Issue Understanding, Position Clarity, Use of Evidence & Examples, Speech Structure & Language, and Delivery & Confidence. Each criterion is rated from Excellent to Beginning, reflecting the depth of understanding, clarity of position, use of supporting evidence, organization of speech, and delivery confidence. The rubric serves as a guideline for assessing participants' performance in relation to their knowledge and presentation skills.

Uploaded by

Dharani.R Raks Pallikkoodam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
31 views1 page

Grade 9-12

The GSL MUN Screening Rubric evaluates research focus based on five criteria: Country & Issue Understanding, Position Clarity, Use of Evidence & Examples, Speech Structure & Language, and Delivery & Confidence. Each criterion is rated from Excellent to Beginning, reflecting the depth of understanding, clarity of position, use of supporting evidence, organization of speech, and delivery confidence. The rubric serves as a guideline for assessing participants' performance in relation to their knowledge and presentation skills.

Uploaded by

Dharani.R Raks Pallikkoodam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

GSL MUN Screening Rubric – Research Focus Only

Criteria Excellent Proficient Developing Beginning


Demonstrates deep
understanding of the country’s Shows good knowledge Shows some Limited or unclear
background and how it relates of the country and awareness of the understanding of
1. Country & Issue to the agenda; accurate and issue; mostly accurate, country or issue but the country or the
Understanding contextually strong. with minor gaps. lacks detail or clarity. agenda topic.
Position is clearly stated, Position is evident and The position is Position is missing,
aligned with country policy, mostly aligned with somewhat vague or unclear, or
and shows originality or depth policy; reasonably well lacks consistency with contradicts known
2. Position Clarity of thought. explained. country stance. facts.
Effectively includes relevant Includes some No evidence or
data, past actions, or supporting facts or Minimal or generic examples used to
3. Use of Evidence & international references to examples, with examples used; may support the
Examples support the position. reasonable relevance. lack direct relevance. speech.
Speech is well-organized, Speech has a clear
formal, and impactful with structure with Some structures Lacks structure;
4. Speech Structure & diplomatic tone and clear appropriate tone; minor present; informal or uses informal or
Language transitions. language issues. unclear in places. inappropriate tone.
Speaks confidently with Very hesitant or
excellent pacing, tone, eye Mostly confident; some Hesitant delivery; inaudible; relies
contact, and minimal reliance hesitation but maintains frequent reading or completely on
5. Delivery & Confidence on notes. good flow. monotone speech. reading.

Name Grade Criteria 1 Criteria 2 Criteria 3 Criteria 4 Criteria 5 S/NS

A.Meghna 9th intergrated


Irfan Cb 9a
Saifaan.Z.Deen CB9B

Navya
Muhammad Saeed Siraj
N.S.Aryan Shangamaesh
Aathmika Suresh Kumar
Arya Sanjey. K
Vineet
Tarun J Venkatesh

You might also like