INTRODUCTION
Pesticides are the chemical substances which are used to kill harmful or which can
damage the living organisms (Mathews, 2019). Pesticides have been put in to different classes
based on their uses and handling e.g. bactericides, algicides, herbicides, fungicides, nematicides,
insecticides, and rodenticides, while those having carbon rings are organophosphorus,
carbamates, organochlorine, acetamides, Triazines and triazoles, pyrethroids and neonicotinoids
(Tarla et al., 2020). During the period of green revolution in Pakistan, major focus was also to
produce the harmless pesticides in order to control the widespread variety of insects and herbal
pests which can deteriorate the quality and quantity of global food stuffs (Hassaan and El-Nemr,
2020; Gunstone et al., 2021). Among the pesticides, about 85% production of pesticides is
consumed in agriculture sector while rest of pesticides are consumed for the public health
activities e.g. for controlling vector-borne diseases, unwanted or extra plants while in industries
to control insects, fungi, bacteria, pest’s algae in electrical appliances, daily used equipment and
food packaging (Gilden et al., 2010). It has been estimated that about 5.6 billion pounds of
pesticides are being utilized worldwide annually which is also increasing unexpectedly
(Alavanja, 2009). The estimated amount of pesticides being used globally is approximately 45%
in Europe, 25% in USA and 25% in rest of the world (Bourguet and Guillemaud, 2016) in which
China and USA are the top while Pakistan has been ranked at the second position in Soth Asian
(Yadav et al., 2015; Waheed et al., 2017).
       A variety of compounds are present in pesticides which are used for different agricultural
practices including, herbicides, nematicides, molluscidies, rodenticides, insecticides, fungicides
and various plant growth regulators. Pesticides have a wide range of uses, sources and toxic
nature depending upon the purpose of use and synthesis (Bashir et al., 2018) and due to these
reasons; pesticides have high global concerns (Damalas and Eleftherohorinos, 2011) because
harvesters and neighborhood of the cultivated areas are exposed directly or indirectly to the
pesticides during treatment, cleaning and storage of agriculture products (Hutter et al., 2021).
Even a good pesticide is not only harmful for the plants and animals in the ecosystem but also
causes the damage to the targeted specimen organisms for which being used (Arias-Estevez et
al., 2008). Unfortunately, many new and powerful pesticides are being formulated to combat the
increasing food demand (Mostafalou and Abdollahi, 2013) because without usage of pesticides,
vegetables, fruits and cereals are attacked by pests and relevant diseases causing losses of
quantity as well as quality of food stuff. However many authors e.g. (Oliveira et al.,
2021; Riedo et al., 2021; Trudi et al., 2021) have reported several adverse impacts on plants,
animals and ecosystem due to their usage.
1.2    Types of pesticides in use
       According to Gracia (2012) pesticides are categorized in to diverse groups based on ther
chemistry, modes of action, functional groups and toxicity levels. Mostly pesticides are
categorized in to fungicides, herbicides, insecticides and rodenticides based on their nature of use
(Amaral, 2014; Mnif et al., 2011). Group of pesticides based on chemical classes, are
categorized into inorganic and organic components. Inorganic pesticides contain copper sulfate,
copper, ferrous sulfate, sulfur and lime while organic pesticides are more complex having severe
chronic effects (Kim et al., 2017). Organic pesticides can be categorized further rendering to
their chemical structure, such as chlorohydrocarbon insecticides, carbamate insecticides,
organophosphorus insecticides, metabolite, synthetic pyrethroid insecticides, synthetic urea,
herbicides, benzimidazole nematocides, triazine herbicides, metal phosphide and rodenticides
(Zhang et al., 2018).
Overall the use of pesticide is expected to cross about 4 million tons/year (FAOSTAT, 2010)
because their supply all over the world is very rough and unchecked (Pimentel,2016). It has been
observed that European countries are utilizing one third of pesticide while a quarter of total
pesticide is utilized by North America. Herbicides accounts for approximately half of the total
pesticides utilized in North America including fungicides 13%, insecticides 19% and the
remaining 22% contains diversity of other materials (Gianessi and Silvers, 1992). Similarly
insecticides are also considered as predominant in emerging agricultural activities, i.e. crops and
livestock, are the chief consumers of these insecticides worldwide reaching to 74% of the yearly
utilization with 1% for forestry (Pimentel et al., 1991). Pesticides like Dichloro Diphenyl
Trichloroethane (DDT), lindane are being widely used in Scandinavian and Asian countries on
large scale for agriculture purposes. (Voldner and Li, 1995). While the maximum use of the DDT
is to resist mosquito vectors of tse-tse fly and malaria in South Africa and tropical countries. The
use of these pesticides also varies as harvests fluctuate extensively like corn, cotton crops and
soybean are the chief herbicides consumers in the world with 75% in United States of America
and 25% rest of the world, similarly insecticides are used for plantations while vegetables and
vineyards utilize maximum of the fungicides (Pimentel et al., 1991).
Pesticides are also classified on the basis of their composition named: Organophosphates,
pyrethroids, organochlorines, carbamates and chlorines. Some pesticides are soluble in water
while others are soluble in organic solvents. They perform various functions on the basis of their
composition. They usually touch the nervous system of the pests and destroy them. They are
harmless in expressions of their use for non target material (Badii and Landeros, 2007; Ortiz-
Hernandez et al., 2013).
1.2    BEHAVIOR OF PESTICIDES IN THE ECOSYSTEM
       Pesticides after their utilization for target plants, are disposed of in the soil, they normally
have capacity to migrate within the soil through water by the process of transport or degradation
(Singh, 2012; Liu et al., 2015) and finally degradation of pesticide in the environment generates
many new substances or chemicals as mntioned in Figure 1 (Marie et al., 2017). Pesticides can
also move from target sites to other sites having no vegetation by the process of transfer
involving leaching, adsorption, spray drift, volatilization and runoff depending upon their
behavior (Robinson et al., 1999). Pesticides like organochlorine complexes containing DDT
which has low acute toxicity but it can produce chronic impacts because this persists in the
tissues of plants leading to long lasting destruction of growth and physiological activities,
whereas organophosphate pesticides have also slight effects, but these can produce negative
impacts if persist for a longer period in mammals (Kim et al., 2017; Damalas and
Eleftherohorinos, 2011).
Initially, pesticides are spread in the environment through air, water, soil, animals and plants but
finally these are converted to their derivatives or converted to their more complex structures. The
quantity of pesticides also contribute to a larger extent because after degradation, these chemicals
migrates towards soil, air and ground water which recirculate with their movement (Kerle et al.,
2007). Pesticide can persist for a longer period of time in environment depending upon the half
life of compounds constituting these pesticides although, a pesticide generally has a half-life of
fifteen days. It has been reported by many authors that 50% of the pesticides can exist fifteen
days after their applications to the target plants while half of that quantity (25% of the original
quantity) can exist for thirty days more. Due to posing this character of extension in the half life,
as the life time increases, the mobility of these pesticides also increase in the soil and
environment (Tiryaki and Temur, 2010).
There are various factors which effect the persistence of these pesticides which include photo-
degradation, microbial degradation and chemical degradation. The degree of degradation of these
pesticides in the environment also depends on chemistry of compounds, environmental
conditions and circulation pattern (Simeonov et al., 2013). Kerle et al. (2007) also reported that
mobility of pesticides in the environment is exaggerated by the sorption, solubility, vapor
pressure, environmental conditions including weather, canopy, topography, ground cover and
texture, organic matter, structure of soil. By modeling the occurrence of pesticide, can be a
valuable way for evaluating the destiny and also the influence of pesticide in the surroundings,
which may be used to find out the amount, frequency of breakdown that provides the evidence
for the removal of pesticide from the environment (Sunaryani and Rosmalina, 2021; Tiryaki and
Temur, 2010).
Impacts of pesticides on plants, animals, soil ecosystem, aquatic ecosystem and atmosphere
Advantages of pesticides are converted into the disadvantages due to its harmful impacts which
are due to interference and inclusion of pesticides in the food chain especially in drinking water
sources (Tariq et al., 2003) as shown in Table 1. Health impacts are mainly associated with the
food which is contaminated with toxic pesticides. This is because pesticides sprayed mostly
effect species which are non-targeted in air, water and soil (Miller, 2004). Toxicity of pesticides
is resulted from inhalation, ingestion and absorption. If exposure to pesticides continued for a
long period, it is resulted in serious diseases including: neurological dysfunctions, hormonal
imbalance, immune system dysfunction and blood disorders etc. (Kubrak et al., 2012). Pesticides
have significant dangerous effects on plant growth, germination, and development, variations in
biochemical passageways, yield and some antioxidant enzymes as explained in Table
1 (Parveen et al., 2016). Accumulation of pesticide by plants effects the growth of plants by
causing metabolic disorders (Sharples et al., 1997).
Pesticides also have adverse impacts on health of human and animals in several ways as
mentioned in Table 2. Pesticides enter into the human body by inhalation from air, dust and
vapors containing pesticides, orally by consuming contaminated water and food and by dermal
exposure through direct contact with pesticides (Sacramento, 2008). Pesticides are sprayed on
food crops from there they secrete in soil and water and pollute them for consuming and spray
drift pollute air. Exposure to these contaminated goods takes pace when these are in contact with
human body in the environment (Lorenz, 2009). People are put in trouble during management
and utilization of pesticides, as these produce toxicity during cleaning, keeping apparatus,
pollution of water, clothing and food (Hutter, 2021).
Several impacts of pesticides have also been observed on soil ecosystem as long term storage
compartment is provided by soil to pesticides having organic carbon because of its buffer,
filtering capacity and high potential of degradation as described in Table 3 (Burauel and
Bassmann, 2005). Pesticides present in soil are exposed through direct or indirect ways. Directly
these are exposed through application in the field while indirect means are accidental leakage,
spillage or run-off through plant surface (Bailey and White, 1970; Rashid et al., 2010).
Contamination of soil may occur due to uncontrolled use of pesticides which can kill non-
targeted organisms by damaging soil biomass witch effect microorganisms including bacteria,
earthworm and fungi (Azam et al., 2003) as shown in Table 4. When pesticides target non-
targeted organisms, this damage their metabolism which is required for soil fertility and pesticide
degradation (Kale and Raghu, 1989). For control of pests and plant diseases, farmers use
pesticides excessively which damage the soil adversely (Oberemok et al., 2015).
Table 1: Impacts of pesticides on plants.
S.   Impact                                                               Reference
No
1    Affect plant growth, germination, and development, variations in     Parveen et al., 2016
     biochemical passageways, yield and some antioxidant enzymes
2    Affect the physiology of crop                                        Giménez–Moolhuyzen
                                                                          et al., 2020
3    Affect the plant growth and cause metabolic disorders                Sharples et al., 1997
4    Block the photosystem II in photosynthesis pathway                   DelValle, et al., 1985
5    Affect the photosystem II badly in chloroplast                       Devine et al., 1993
6    Reduced chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll along with            Tort and Turkyilmaz,
     carotenoid contents in                                               2003
     the leaves of pepper
7    Decrease in the supply of photosynthesis in the roots                Alonge, 2000
8    Decrease in photosystem II and whole chain activities                Mathur and Bohra,
                                                                          1992
9    Reduced the growth of root and shoot                                 Mishra et al., 2008
10 Caused nearly complete inhibition of growth in maize plants            Murthy et al., 2005
11 Decrease in pods and seed yield of rice crop                           Mugo, 1989
12 Decrease in the growth and yield of barley plants                      Boonlertnirun et al.,
                                                                          2005
13 Changes in vegetation growth, death of plant, decrease in              Altman, 1993
     reproduction capability, reduced fitness and detrimental, economic
     and ecological impacts
14 Mutations in crop genes and changes in uptake of nutrients,            Marrs et al., 1991
     transport of nutrients and metabolism of crops
Table 2: Impacts of pesticides on human and animals.
Sr. Impacts                                                                       Reference
No
1     Cause of chronic diseases which effect nervous system, reproductive             Mostafalou
      system, cardiovascular system, renal system and respiratory system              and Abdollahi,
                                                                                      2012
2     Cause headaches, skin rashes, nausea, body ache, poor concentration,            PAN, 2012
      dizziness, cramps, panic attacks, impaired vision, birth defects, production
      of benign or malignant tumors, toxicity in fetus, mutations, nerve disorders,
      genetic changes, blood disorders, reproduction effects and endocrine
      disruption. In animals pesticides cause potential carcinogens, reproductive
      toxins, neurotoxins and immune toxins. Some studies show the development
      of neurodegenerative diseases
Table 3: Impacts of pesticides on soil ecosystem.
Sr.     Impact                                                              Reference
No.
1       Damages and reduction of soil biomass                               Azam et al., 2003
2       Damages in the local metabolism                                     Kale and Raghu, 1989
3       Contaminate the soil nutrients and cause adverse effects on         Oberemok et al., 2015
       humans and environment
4      Cause acute poisoning for microbial biomass                         Yadav and Devi et al.,
                                                                           2015
5      Pollute surface and water bodies                                    Yadav and Devi, 2017
6      Decline in the soil fertility                                       Jia and Conrad, 2009
Table 4: Impacts of pesticides on aquatic ecosystem.
S.    Impact                                                                      Reference
No.
1     Create pollution in aquatic ecosystem and cause ecological damages          Macneale et al.,
      which in turn damage the natural habitat of fishes in water bodies          2010
2     Damages of aquatic life which includes fish and plants by reducing          Mahmood et al.,
      dissolve oxygen levels leading to changes in physiology of aquatic life     2016
3     Damage of aquatic plants, animals and marine populations                    Helfrich et al.,
                                                                                  2009
Pesticides also create pollution in aquatic ecosystem as mentioned in Table 4. by contaminating
surface and ground water. Ground water contamination cause major changes in water
quality. Even after controlled use of pesticides, traces are also found in drinking water which can
be a source of human exposure to pesticides (Macneale et al., 2010). Water, which is the
fundamental need of life, is being polluted severely because of several natural and anthropogenic
activities (Hussain and Asi, 2008). Toxicity of pesticides in aquatic ecosystem is depended on
some factors including exposure level, immune response, immunologic assay method, stress
limits and toxicity of pesticide. Toxicity of pesticides have also been found high when these are
present as composite mixture having several components (Banerjee, 1999).
Remediation technologies for pesticides removal
Due to increasing usage of pesticides, it is being a topic of great concern that how to remove
pesticides from environment. Many techniques or remedies have been discovered for the
removal of pesticides from environment including soil, water, air and food. The instant ways for
removal or reduction of pesticide from food are washing, peeling, cooking and blanching (Street,
1969). However these methods are not enough to completely remove pesticides from food due to
their stability and persistency. Biological and chemical treatments based technologies are
available for pesticide recovery from polluted soil and decommissioning of hazardous wastes
(Gavrilescu, 2009). Some suitable techniques have been given in the Table 4 which shows the
use of different technologies and plants for removal of pesticides. In this regard, Contaminant-
Immobilization Technology (CIT) is an in-situ approach used for very low effective cost for the
restoration of soil polluted by pesticides within shorter period of time. In this technique,
adsorption takes place which cause toxicity to non-targeted organisms. Minimum treatments are
required because carbonate materials are generally are taken up from biological material by
using organically active residues (Calugaru et al., 2018). Other one which is also most frequently
used is the separation technology, in which solvents and synthetic surfactants are used to remove
contaminant from sludge medium. In this remediation technique possible methods used are in the
form of are; solvents, synthetic surfactants, soil flushing, cyclodextrins and Biosurfactants. The
solvent is chosen depending on the pollutant which has to be removed (Mao and Yang, 2013).
Fenton advanced oxidation process is used to remove organochlorode pesticides (OCPs)
including DDT. DDT pesticide is highly persistent and has high bioaccumulation which is
hazardous to environment. However, this is not enough for complete removal of DDT and other
chlorinated organic toxicants. For achieving complete removal of DDT, high utilization of
ferrous salts are needed for recovery process and since the acids are used for degradation and
removal of DDT, high amounts of acids acidifies the soil and cause erosion with loss of fertility
of soil (Villa et al., 2008). Supercritical fluid extraction technique is also one of best techniques
used for extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from subcritical polluted water. In this
technique microorganisms are used for bioremediation and degrading the polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons from effluents including trinitrotoluene and poly chlorinated biphenyls (Ramos-
Contreras et al., 2019). In Electro-kinetic remediation technique, zero valance iron nano-particles
are used to prevent environment from pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and
bio-chlorinated solvents. These are detoxified by using zero valence iron nano-particles but this
technique has limitation, as zero valence iron nano-particles have high reactivity (Tummala and
Tewari, 2018).
Photocatalysis is also good technique for degradation of pesticides which use semiconductors of
metal oxides, sulfides, metal free ions and those materials which serve as substrate for
photocatalyst in composite material. This technique may include: titanium oxide based
photocatalysis, zinc sulfide based photocatalysis, G-C 3N4 based photocatalysis and graphite
based photocatalysis (Lin and Shen et al., 2014). Phytoremediation is a biological technique for
the removal of pesticides from environment which is very cheap technique working on solar
power. Phytoremediation use efficient plant species which can remove or eliminate pesticide
pollutants from environment. This technique can remove pesticide pollutants from 0% to 70%
(Main et al., 2017). Plants remove pesticide pollutants by using Phytodegradation,
Phytoextraction and Rhizodegradation (Truua et al., 2015). These techniques are highly
ecofriendly, safe, economical or less costly and effective for the removal of pesticide pollutants
from environment (Kuppusamy et al., 2016). Algae is a potent organism for the removal of
pesticide pollutants through microalgae pesticide remediation which is a photosynthetic
organism which convert solar energy into chemical energy and has a very simple structure which
make transport of nutrients easier and faster (Chacoon-Lee and González-Mariño, 2010).
Microalgae remove pesticides from contaminated sites by bioaccumulation and considered a
potent organism for this purpose because it uses organic pollutants as their energy source
(Chojnacka, 2010). Microalgae are efficient biosorbents which not only accumulate pesticides
but also convert them into less toxic substances. The efficiency of this biodegradation is
dependent upon environmental condition, nature and concentration of pesticide which is to be
degraded (Ortiz-Hernandez et al., 2013). Microalgae can survive in any environmental condition
and are capable of efficient biodegradation of pesticides from contaminated sites
(Subashchandrabose et al., 2013).
Degradation of pesticides by using bacteria is another biological method which is very less cost
effective, ecofriendly and best technique for removal of pesticides (Gavrilescu, 2005). Bacteria
can degrade pesticides at good rate isolated from different ecosystems including bacteria from
genus Arthrobacter, Flavobacterium, Burkholderia, Peudomonas and Azobacter. This is an
effective technique which does not cause any further damage to environment. In this technique
microbes degrade pesticides for nutrients and release CO 2 and H2O in environment (Huang and
Zeng, 2008). Degradation of pesticides is also dependent on the conditions of available
environment, exposure and specie of bacteria. Efficiency of bacteria for pesticide removal is
faster in the presence of anions (Rani and Dhania, 2014) and bacteria uptake pesticide pollutants
converting them into inorganic compounds. Mycoremediation is also a biological technique for
pesticide removal which includes fungi for degradation of pesticide as fungi is a eukaryotic,
saprophytic, heterotrophic and parasitic organism which produce spore and grow in cool and
humid environment (Jobard et al., 2010). Fungi transform and detoxify pollutants by taking them
up from contaminated environment. By this procedure fungi remove pesticides from soil and
water ecosystem (Tortella et al., 2005). Fungi also cause changes in chemical structure of
pesticide and convert them into non-toxic compounds which are easily degraded by microflora
(Hai and Modin, 2012). Fungi use different processes for pesticide degradation including
Hydroxylation, Dioxylation, Dechlorination, Dehydrochlorination and Esterification. Fungi use
these processes for pesticide degradation because pesticide have various functional groups which
minimize the crop damage. Fungi attack on functional groups of pesticides and cause rapid
degradation of pesticides (Maqbool et al., 2016; Ponnuchamy et al., 2021).
Conclusions and Recommendation
Pesticides are chemical fertilizers used mostly in agriculture sector for controlling unwanted
organisms which can damage crops. Although pesticides have many benefits but also pose severe
impacts on environment. They damage our natural environment by contaminating it and cause
several health issues. Recently, removal of pesticide pollutants is a topic of major concern
worldwide. Many techniques have been developed for removal of pesticides in this regard and
many new techniques are being developed for their safe removal. Pesticides can be removed
from soil, water and environment by using plants, animals and different chemicals. Soil and
environment can be saved from pesticides toxicity by wise use of pesticide for crops.
                                         REFERENCES
 Alavanja, M.C., 2009. Introduction: Pesticides use and exposure, extensive worldwide. Rev.
    Environ. Health, 24: 303-310. https://doi.org/10.1515/REVEH.2009.24.4.303
 Alonge, S.O., 2000. Effect of imazaquin applications on the growth, leaf chlorophyll and yield
    of soybean in the guinea savanna of Nigeria. J. Environ. Sci. Health B, 35: 321–
    336. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230009373273
 Amaral, A.F.S., 2014. Pesticides and asthma: Challenges for epidemiology. Front. Publ.
    Health, 2: 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00006
 Azam, F., S. Farooq and A. Lodhi. 2003. Microbial biomass in agricultural soils determination,
    synthesis, dynamics and role in plant nutrition. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 6(7): 629-
    639. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.629.639
 Badii, M.H., and J.L. Flores. 2007. Plaguicidas que afectan a la salud humana y la
    sustentabilidad. Cult. Cient. Tecnol., 4(19): 21-34.
 Bailey, G.W. and J.L. White. 1970. Factors influencing the adsorption, desorption, and
    movement of pesticides in soil. In Single Pesticide Volume: The Triazine Herbicides, pp.
    29-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8464-3_4
Banerjee, B.D., 1999. The influence of various factors on immune toxicity assessment of
  pesticide   chemicals.    Toxicol.       Lett.,   107:    21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-
  4274(99)00028-4
Bashir, M.H., M. Zahid, M.A. Khan, M. Shahid, A.K. Khan, and L. Amrao. 2018. Pesticides
  toxicity for Neoseiulus barkeri (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and non-target organisms. Pak. J.
  Agric. Sci., 55: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/18.5277
Boonlertnirun, S., K. Boonlertnirun and I. Sooksathan. 2005. In: Proceedings of 43 rd Kasetsart
  University Annual Conference, Thailand, 1–4 February, pp. 37–43.
Bourguet, D. and T. Guillemaud. 2016. The hidden and external costs of pesticide use. Sustain.
  Agric. Rev., 19: 35-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26777-7_2
Burauel, P. and F. Bassmann. 2005. Soils as filter and buffer for pesticides-experimental
  concepts     to    understand     soil       functions.    Environ.     Pollut.,   133:    11-
  16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2004.04.011