0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views6 pages

Preservation Vs Modernizatio

The document argues for the prioritization of historical preservation over modern development in Old Sacramento to maintain its cultural heritage and historical significance. It highlights the economic and community benefits of preserving such sites, including fostering pride and identity while supporting tourism. The author acknowledges opposing views on modernization but emphasizes that long-term benefits of preservation outweigh short-term economic gains from development.

Uploaded by

2wdd86cfh5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views6 pages

Preservation Vs Modernizatio

The document argues for the prioritization of historical preservation over modern development in Old Sacramento to maintain its cultural heritage and historical significance. It highlights the economic and community benefits of preserving such sites, including fostering pride and identity while supporting tourism. The author acknowledges opposing views on modernization but emphasizes that long-term benefits of preservation outweigh short-term economic gains from development.

Uploaded by

2wdd86cfh5
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

1

Athena Campbell

Dr. Jessie Herrada Nance

WR 121

02 June 2024

Preservation or Modernization?

Nestled along the banks of the Sacramento River, Old Sacramento stands as a vivid

testament to California's Gold Rush era, with its cobblestone streets, wooden sidewalks, and

preserved 19th-century buildings. This historic district, rich in cultural heritage, attracts visitors

from all over the world eager to experience a slice of America's past. However, in recent years,

pressures for modern development and commercialization have threatened the integrity of this

unique area. Prioritizing historical preservation over modern development and

commercialization is crucial for maintaining Old Sacramento's unique cultural heritage and

historical significance, thereby educating future generations, fostering community pride, and

sustaining a thriving tourism industry that benefits the local economy.

Preserving historical sites like Old Sacramento is essential for safeguarding our cultural

heritage. These sites offer far more than just a glimpse into the architectural styles of bygone

eras; they serve as living records of our collective history. Historical buildings are not merely

relics but rather the physical embodiment of memory. As Madhaven emphasizes, “historical

buildings are the physical manifestation of memory. Historic preservation's role in helping us

understand who we are, where we have been, and where we are going is central to the social
2

component of sustainable development”(236). This quote underscores the intrinsic value of

historic sites as pivotal components of our social and cultural development. They provide a

continuous link to our heritage vital to our ongoing social and cultural development, aiding us

navigate the present and plan for the future. Preserving historical sites like Old Sacramento is not

solely an act of conservation but rather a crucial investment in our cultural and social

sustainability. By safeguarding these sites, we ensure that the invaluable lessons and legacies of

the past endure, enriching our memories and guiding future generations.

Modern development and commercialization pose significant threats to the integrity and

authenticity of historical sites like Old Sacramento. As urbanization and economic interests

encroach upon these cultural treasures, preserving their historical significance and original

character faces becomes increasingly challenging. As Long notes in“Lost Charlston”,

“Modernity is the natural enemy of preservation” (10), highlighting the inherent tension between

new developments and the imperative need to maintain historical integrity. Even seemingly

minor changes can erode the historical fabric of an area, diminishing its value as a cultural and

educational resource. When historic buildings are supplanted by modern structures, the unique

character and aesthetic of the district are lost, supplanted by generic, homogenized architecture.

Moreover, commercialization often prioritizes profit over cultural value, resulting in a dilution in

the sense of historical authenticity and community connection. Businesses fixated solely on

profit may disregard the historical significance of their surroundings, opting instead for flashy

contemporary designs that clash with the historical context. This shift can reduce a historically

rich area into a mere backdrop for commercial activities, undermining its educational and

cultural value.
3

Preserving cultural heritage not only stimulates the local economies but also nurtures

community pride and identity by upholding a tangible connection to the past. This dual impact is

vividly evident in various regions, including Oklahoma, where the significance of historic

preservation evidently extends beyond mere economic metrics. As noted in a recent study,

“While numbers are important to quantitatively frame the many economic contributions of

historic preservation of Oklahoma, they do not convey the significant qualitative contribution of

preservation to local revitalization in this state” (Preservation Oklahoma Inc, 19). The authors

highlight two critical aspects of historic preservation. Firstly, they acknowledge its economic

benefits, including job creation, tourism revenue, and augmented property value, which provide

tangible financial impetus and spur further investment in the region. Moreover, the quote adeptly

emphasizes the intangible contributions that cannot be measured solely by statistics. These

contributions play a pivotal role in fostering community pride and identity. The preservation of

historical sites and structures facilitates a tangible connection to the past, enabling residents to

immerse themselves in and celebrate their shared heritage. This connection strengthens

community bonds as individuals take pride in their distinct history and cultural landmarks,

fostering a distinct sense of continuity and identity that allows communities to understand their

roots and evolve with a profound appreciation of their roots.

Analyzing successful preservation models can offer valuable strategies for revitalizing

Old Sacramento or similar historic sites. For instance, “the revitalization of Cleveland’s

warehouse district, now a successful mixed-use downtown neighborhood, began in the 1970s

with artists illegally occupying former industrial warehouse buildings,” (Tighe and

Ryberg-webster, 11). This example illustrates how community-driven initiatives can spark
4

significant urban renewal, offering valuable lessons for preserving and revitalizing areas with

historical significance. The transformation of Cleveland's district highlights the potential for

creative and community driven approaches to breathe new life into historic sites. This

transformation demonstrates that with the right strategies and mindsets, such areas can continue

to thrive.

While we’ve explored the benefits of preserving historical sites, it’s crucial to address

opposing arguments. Some argue that modern development and commercialization are vital for

economic growth, as preservation may not seem immediately profitable. However, it’s crucial to

recognize that the long-term economic benefits from tourism and preservation outweigh the short

term gains from development. Additionally, while some believe that commercialization would

enhance accessible and enjoyment, authentic, well-preserved sites hold greater value for both

tourists and residents. For instance, during my time in Sacramento, the Old Sacramento district

was deeply cherished for its historical significance. This underscores the importance of

maintaining physical connections to our past. Another common argument is that development is

necessary to accommodate population growth and modern needs. While valid, smart planning

and adaptive reuse of existing historical structures can meet modern needs without sacrificing

heritage.

Ultimately, safeguarding Old Sacramento through historical preservation is essential for

maintaining its cultural heritage and historical significance. Choosing to prioritize preservation

over modern development not only allows for a deep connection with the past but also nurtures a

collective sense of community pride and continuity. Furthermore, investing in heritage tourism

and nurturing the vibrant cultural life that preservation sustains presents a sustainable alternative
5

to the fleeting benefits of commercialization. As we gaze into the future, it becomes increasingly

crucial for policymakers, community members, and stakeholders alike to collaborate in

safeguarding and cherishing Old Sacramento for its uniqueness and historical assets. Through

collaborative efforts, we can ensure that this iconic district continues to serve as a beacon of

education, inspiration, and enrichment for both visitors and residents for generations to come.
6

Works Cited

Legacy Cities : Continuity and Change amid Decline and Revival, edited by J. Rosie Tighe, and

Stephanie Ryberg-Webster, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2019. ProQuest Ebook

Central,

https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.cgcc-access.sage.eou.edu/lib/cgcc/detail.action?docID

=5789179.

Long, J. Grahame. Lost Charleston, The History Press, 2019. ProQuest Ebook Central,

https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.cgcc-access.sage.eou.edu/lib/cgcc/detail.action?docID

=5742302

Practicing Sustainability, edited by Guru Madhavan, et al., Springer, 2012. ProQuest Ebook

Central,

https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.cgcc-access.sage.eou.edu/lib/cgcc/detail.action?docID

=1030820

Preservation Oklahoma Inc. Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation in Oklahoma. 2008.

https://cgcc.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1121624521

You might also like