0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views14 pages

STM 4,2 Units

The document discusses state graphs and transition testing, emphasizing the importance of understanding states, transitions, and events in software systems for effective testing. It highlights the applications of state graphs in model-based testing, transition testing, and the significance of good versus bad state graphs in ensuring testability and coverage. Additionally, it provides tips for improving testability in software design and outlines various testing techniques, including transaction flow testing and domain testing.

Uploaded by

razrazzle0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views14 pages

STM 4,2 Units

The document discusses state graphs and transition testing, emphasizing the importance of understanding states, transitions, and events in software systems for effective testing. It highlights the applications of state graphs in model-based testing, transition testing, and the significance of good versus bad state graphs in ensuring testability and coverage. Additionally, it provides tips for improving testability in software design and outlines various testing techniques, including transaction flow testing and domain testing.

Uploaded by

razrazzle0
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14
- UNIT-IV l. State | state Graphs and “Wansition testing. Ly state testing. Ly good & bad stele graphs Ly Testabitity, “lips Topic — 1 “ly Stocte ¢ ; ; A stete represents a condition o¢ stluation of} ov | sgstern oF proqrano at a Specific Vine! Stk shows whet the syste ts doing. oF whet i Vemembers act that, “moment, hoes Qo 5 state may depend on inputs , past actions or events . | example of stotes in a Login System — Loaged out | > a -for password —_ Logged In = Locked (after failed acttempts)) |2. stecke qraphs * * state graph ig a Visuad m d : as stote transition dieqary ae i also called us states of system Les Transitions belween states i Inputs oy events -thok cause -those cbgans tors, | pasic elements 1 stote > A etecle of box representing a Stete’, 2, Transition —y An aru showing movement between states. 7 3. Event —s # label om -+he arrow showing whet riggers the transition. | _gsample + simple Tunstile ' tates 2° 2 ' Block stote Graph + | Ly unlocked [Locked]—- (coiq) - -> [pnlocked events: [unlocked] ~-Cpush)--> [Locked ] Ly Coi9 2 posh t licactions of state Graphs in —teshing. -5 Used in’ model-based testing : > Helps test behawisred aspects ofa system, Ls Useful for -testing. ol systems, protocols , workF low logic . etc .: ; gp eles orci test cases +thed cover all transitions Diagram > ; “4 ‘ener user | Transition ctesting- - ¥ esking. is a SotHware estin technic esto eet designed “2 check’ Gd and ets skate -bransttions ina Sd fee 5A black box testing. echnignse based on States and -—bransttions Sat is based on the idea of eels machines one Hg Syste moves from one stote 0 another Bi Stow “siggeting evint. or a ; when | _to, ose it 3 > then software behaves | differently in «det ferens Stectes , > when event-driven or workflow —bosed Sepstemy | axe involved : > Common in Ul cpletons, embedded s ystens AT™ Login modules ; ett... | Exainple 2 ATM Machine . Stetes + —> Idle => card Shserted TD Pin Vertibled oe Transaction | fal Events 5 ey | > Insert cord, Erte PIN, withdraw , Eject card. Transition Test Cases ts « Insevt catd —y Move +o card Insevted. | + Enley covet PIN—> move to pin verified. ° Ty to withers ere _heertin cea Jovolid yansition, ‘t coment, event: state, Biche idle tasevt card Jk cava ate: ‘ad os inserted ener | pin verified withd-euo EE on Verteied Transactien : Trvolid Fransackoay isle. Fath, Benifits of Hransittien sesking . sy petects incowrect state handling- > Helps in -testing business voles (°° > cmpsove& coverage of event combinations ted sequences, > Finds hidden bogs due + unexpec: sted; Testing. ss stote teshhg iS a technique where 4the systero is testeal by exarnining- ile istactes and -the -transittons between 7 is a black-box esting’ techniewe bor yaaa’ with muttiple Ss 73e : at checks wshether sha sollWare ‘loehaves’ in each stete.'and Hansttens properly ese! als inputs of events. i249 / Jo. \ key cone | \. Skate —> A specific, mode ox condition oF syste (2. Event —9 Topot of action thec éavses ‘a -harsitien -Ransition —> A movement From one state +o ; [ another based on an event, aN /4. Thitial shade > where the System shorts S- Final state —> where “the system ends. Diagram % username Example + _ Login system ” Stotes: — start, | 5 Username Entered —. password Srrlered = Logged In —> Locked | events 2 > Enter username enter passin, sulomitt Fail Adtempls — when +o use td Ly when software has mottiple' user of system stedes, Ly hen system behavior depends en previols events . -L> Usefol fox Ul Aesting., dewice control sqstems , workflow ‘ ¢ eal” condens —> Finds Invalid stete -transttions, “t 2 aS —y Helps design beHey +est cases, Good ‘and bad state graphs : ‘ Pook state: Gaaphs - ' k ; and Feard Inserted] | [Gord Inserted] —- (Entew PrN) -—> | [authenticacted)) Bad stete Graphs + = Missing stokes or -rransitions, Remove sy Unclear of duplicate +transttions . cay * Dead ends ,(stotes from which you can't continue) > Loops wethoot exit (infinite cycles) . 4 unreachable stodes (never used in veal cperatiod) example ; , [xdle] —- C-tosert. card) ~ —> [eavd Inserted] ‘ i } [cavd. anserted] —-CEnter PIN) —> (card Inserted J Cloop with no escape) Difference between (rood & bad state graphs food state graph ‘Bad Stade graph —>H is cleay and easy to 9 Tt is confusing a, Sead. ., Clubtered. AN stokes ave“ meanin full and well-labeled a Shows valid. transttions a Maty include invalid or for all! inputs : missing. -transttions, > xt pes unnecessary — May have: loops hee “cycles oot an exth. ; -—> In tao state graph > Bad state b all skates ave connected oe Wiich ie “= - logical & oye ; isolated stote. i lps generate effective tt makes est cose cases. design difficult. ° — Some states may be unclear or unused’ Testability Tips . (How +o make your software easies to test) Cimproving. ~testabilt means making. tt easiey to write ,xon and evoluacte tests. Good -testabi tidy + helps “ttad bogs faster and improves snbhrra quahi we tk improve deslabully * 1, write moduler code Ly Break code into Small , independent fencchions of classes. UL > easier to test each past Separotel, (net test) 2. Use clear and consistent naming. ¢ é ~ and modules, > Makes the Code easier +0 understand and test 5, Avoid Hard - coded values. | La use Constamts or config. files. Ly €asiex “to change valves ding Es meaningfo| names fog Vowioble’ , Functions aests : y, write test cases early. . Ly cveote test cages while oY before unthing Code. > Encousages clean , test -triendly 4esiq? (wd) methods. 6. Limit Use of Static and priv Ly static and private methods ove diectly . Bs Rea instaree methods and proper access levels, 6. feutormocte resting. Ly Use automoted testing tools (like. Son , Pytest. lenivrd : p cei) taster, tepectable jand consistent teshig hayd to test ONIT—2, amp -lopies i Fransaction flow testing _s techniques’ 2: Dotor Flow testing Basics i Svodle (eg applicctions Domina and path , Nice’ und ug 4 Domains y. Domaw and iarderface testing . Se Domato and Aes kabillity. 3. Doming testing nh \Traosaction flow testirg . A shructus of testing tech nique focused ‘on. business: Logic and uset interactions, > Teansactien flow esting. ts a while - box -lesting techniques +hot focuses on -the , Sequence oe operections (Arran soctton3)) in @ system. sth is Sed do test logico! business. flows . Such 08 banking. sransactions , online osdervs Sxample + online shopping checkook t ronsackoo sHeps * |. Browse tems Ds cast 3. exter address 4 Make payment S . -) order — confiemetien, this flow can be wepresented in a TFG Cra, . - Sactien Graph) - | Transactins loo testing techniqves | Used +o test -brangaction — based systems by anodyzing cacsto} flow and * logic. ood Transaction Hots Graph Cra) construction | -- Ceader o flow graph representing each bransac | -tien step. . ; j = | .. > Nodes = processing steps” oo Screens. —? Edges = transiting [events bho steps This helps Visvolige all possible +ransactlon ' pocths . 7 R pacth ‘Testing. on TRH, "Apply path testing. techniques Clie baxig . path slesting,) to the transaction -flevs graph al independent paths .—, Dectsien ports . —> Loops and conditions 1 Design test coses +o covey all -thsve paths, %) Data flow gesting. phe A white - box testing technique focused op +H thi lifecycle of vaxiables . eis ; | Data flow esting. is a. shroctural esting, © technique that examines —the Flow ‘oF ‘Biato. (vortialles) though oo program. ae focuses on hou variates ore defined ysed ond killed. 77 Ft helps detect eXeVOTS veloded +o wyesrtauliy misose. : : strategies: ot’ DFT. vise H All-defs 3 Atleast one vse fox every versio be. detinition. i PAL—vses EAI CoUSeS and p-uses foe every vasiable definition. Labora, p— predicate.) 6 cleftcition +> oS A\\ do pocths Lor Soe Form eac Applications s every veachalo rpriore he - pata -Flovo testing ty am BE ecting'h > white- pox -testing - > secuitty esting. => Maintenance and “debugging. Val vott a. compiler ee toe \ ! tchos oa B plagrarn t= Hop Dake HO esting Catches o Sog- der . ‘ > Use(x) ; NA XL ts ‘ ~ BK Hy ts oy HK iota used Sey! Giinthaliged “yea eetied A black box an — doevsed on « input Def 3 Domain esting iS a sthet involves inpok valves ors domains” technique : b selecting Ole inputs. > the poops or ~regins (domains) from each yroop ertectvely. Domain Testing. TH a Black-box testing type - ~> Tt Focwes of) input YTonges and -theiy boundaxr irs > Tt & used fax Tastig “npot Validation deotslon tables. 2 Th doesn't vse graph oy some -Hengs input charts . P | domain eel niayse “used Boombry valve, ral hele box esting techniques editions. : Sof-tuoare shesting, esting A Peogranny good lg 4o. divide +ho input space insto and test 3 | pect tesbing > Tt isa white-bor testing. type - | i +s th focuses on execution | paths through the «code. 415 rw" used For testing loops, branches: and program Logic. I? Fe. uses corbyol flow Gwoph (cre). 7 Boss pocth testing. technique 4 used- | we [ete Testing inpuboge. [cit testing —else Velves Ke 0, 50, too, 101 conditions ocnd loops io res : : : he Codd Nice ond ugly Demaing ie Nice Domoein valy Dometn, Bo Dodds Gare, F _ OG = 2 Nice Ore 2 | > veg Domain & Risky: | well-behaved’ inpot vegion, oF enrOy—prone tpyr | i BERION : 2° TH 8 -vsed ‘to clased 2 ge “| ; inpdk Spates for effective > & used to clarsily yest! cose ‘design. inpot spaces for epreclie “pest cade design. > Fk behaves stable. ‘ Sand correct. pxog raro —> Tt behaves likely -t° FeSponse. + tous cause esvors OF ONEKPEK re . -ded ‘tesvlts- > he puspase of ostng. | | _y -the purpose of oly. vice domain is -to | viet. u ae emo funclion |’ pomaln is ‘shess ane. we . 5 ’ Ffaott detection |; cally a- Middle valves > ert Boundary oe tavadid Jee, soya vate C0, 0 op Dott and inbedtece estge. 2 pnare: testing: re : _ mostly. while | > Hw +ypically elack-box & integration rtesting . Stl ise box 4 black -box testing rt Focuses on volidak => TE focus or Volidadi input voles and thety | communication b]u) maivles | ae boundax les. 9 ' ‘ and 5 systems “> rh & used for ieee —> Bis used for Systems with numewe or logical with mottiple component, » Sesvices . inputs. APls ; Gols. > Techniques © Equivalence) —> Techniques 3 API teste partitioning, Boundar prvlocol esting. Service i valve Anobysis (Bva) mocking . > Tools used in domain |—s Tools used in interface rtesting. axe rrianvo}, esklag, are postman , SOAP unit test Prambwarks . REST Assured , Sunit, > exainp lé a | Seber. . Testing. values od example ° o,s0 de 160,101 for in Testing. data passed fom \ Ll +o. backend oy from Tonge t— 100 _ APP A +o Sewice Bo “Spornaio and ard destability. ‘ fr domain titht sebof alt pan inputs “thot a &nction smodole, or syste can accept. ‘Sth may. inclode. valid inputs Cex! numbers ‘bom Ie Geka ipod topots (ex? Lo, tol, stings instead oF aum ers) -P | 6 wo). Sle v bende Valves (ex: exact. Testability + “eshabuily TeFers to how easil | and effectively a system can be tesled, A syster | with high | testabulity ¢ bo TH iS cody 40 observe Bnd Le |! —>, Thar cleax inpot / out pot beh Ss ze Allows Fouts’ +0 be Bivitapevacti

You might also like