Name: RYAN A.
SARTIGA
INSTRUCTIONS: ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS IN 5 SENTENCES
ONLY.
1. How does geography function as both a physical and a social science?
Geography integrates the study of Earth's physical systems (climate,
landforms) with human systems (culture, population). It examines how these
systems interact and influence each other. This dual approach allows for a
comprehensive understanding of spatial patterns and processes. The field
considers both natural and human-induced changes on the Earth's surface.
Therefore, it bridges the gap between the natural and social sciences. This
holistic perspective is crucial for addressing complex global challenges.
2. In what ways can geography enhance our understanding of historical events?
Provide specific historical examples.
Geography provides context for historical events by showing how location and
environment influenced decisions and outcomes. For example, the geography
of the Nile River shaped ancient Egyptian civilization. The location of the Silk
Road facilitated cultural exchange and trade. The mountainous terrain of
Afghanistan influenced military strategies. Geographical factors often explain
why certain events unfolded in specific places. Understanding geography
deepens our comprehension of historical narratives.
3. Compare and contrast the contributions of Alexander von Humboldt and Carl
Ritter to modern geography. How did their approaches reflect interdisciplinary
thinking?
Humboldt emphasized empirical observation and holistic understanding of
nature-human interactions, while Ritter focused on a more systematic,
comparative approach to regional geography. Both were pioneers in
interdisciplinary thinking, integrating natural sciences with human studies.
Humboldt's fieldwork and detailed descriptions laid the groundwork for
environmental geography. Ritter's focus on regional studies advanced
human-environment interactions. Their approaches, though different, both
contributed to the development of modern geography. Their work showed the
importance of integrating multiple perspectives.
4. Evaluate the significance of the Quantitative Revolution in transforming
geography into a more scientific discipline. What are its advantages and limitations?
The Quantitative Revolution introduced mathematical and statistical methods
into geography, enhancing its rigor and objectivity. This allowed for more
sophisticated spatial analysis and modeling. Advantages include improved
precision and testability of hypotheses. However, limitations include potential
oversimplification of complex phenomena and overlooking qualitative aspects.
The focus on quantitative methods sometimes neglected the human element.
A balanced approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods is
essential for a comprehensive understanding.
5. If you were to create a geography curriculum that supports historical inquiry,
what key themes or skills would you include, and why?
A geography curriculum supporting historical inquiry would include themes like
environmental change over time, the evolution of human settlements, and the impact
of geographical factors on historical events. Skills like map interpretation, spatial
analysis, and historical research methods would be central. Students would learn to
analyze primary sources and interpret historical maps. This integrated approach
fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills. The curriculum would encourage
students to connect the past to the present.
