Affect Theory and Early Modern Texts: Politics,

Ecologies, and Form 1st Edition Amanda Bailey

install download

https://textbookfull.com/product/affect-theory-and-early-modern-
texts-politics-ecologies-and-form-1st-edition-amanda-bailey/

Download more ebook instantly today - get yours now at textbookfull.com

We believe these products will be a great fit for you. Click
the link to download now, or visit textbookfull.com
to discover even more!

Biota Grow 2C gather 2C cook Loucas

https://textbookfull.com/product/biota-grow-2c-gather-2c-cook-
loucas/

Early Modern Women's Complaint: Gender, Form, and

Politics Sarah C. E. Ross

https://textbookfull.com/product/early-modern-womens-complaint-
gender-form-and-politics-sarah-c-e-ross/

Witchcraft, Witch-Hunting, and Politics in Early Modern

England 1st Edition Elmer

https://textbookfull.com/product/witchcraft-witch-hunting-and-
politics-in-early-modern-england-1st-edition-elmer/

Early English modals Form function and analogy 1st

Edition Gregersen

https://textbookfull.com/product/early-english-modals-form-
function-and-analogy-1st-edition-gregersen/
Affect Emotion and Subjectivity in Early Modern Muslim
Empires New Studies in Ottoman Safavid and Mughal Art
and Culture 1st Edition Kishwar Rizvi

https://textbookfull.com/product/affect-emotion-and-subjectivity-
in-early-modern-muslim-empires-new-studies-in-ottoman-safavid-
and-mughal-art-and-culture-1st-edition-kishwar-rizvi/

Architecture and the Politics of Gender in Early Modern

Europe 1st Edition Helen Hills (Editor)

https://textbookfull.com/product/architecture-and-the-politics-
of-gender-in-early-modern-europe-1st-edition-helen-hills-editor/

Love's Wounds: Violence and the Politics of Poetry in

Early Modern Europe 1st Edition Nazarian

https://textbookfull.com/product/loves-wounds-violence-and-the-
politics-of-poetry-in-early-modern-europe-1st-edition-nazarian/

Non canonical Religious Texts in Early Judaism and

Early Christianity Lee Martin Mcdonald

https://textbookfull.com/product/non-canonical-religious-texts-
in-early-judaism-and-early-christianity-lee-martin-mcdonald/

Guerrilla Ecologies Green Capital Nature and the

Politics of Catastrophe 1st Edition John Maerhofer

https://textbookfull.com/product/guerrilla-ecologies-green-
capital-nature-and-the-politics-of-catastrophe-1st-edition-john-
maerhofer/
 AFFECT THEORY AND
EARLY MODERN TEXTS
Politics, Ecologies, and Form

Edited by Amanda Bailey

and Mario DiGangi

PALGRAVE STUDIES IN AFFECT THEORY

AND LITERARY CRITICISM
Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and
Literary Criticism

Series Editors

Adam Frank
University of British Columbia
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Joel Faflak
Western University
London, Ontario, Canada
Aims of the Series
The recent surge of interest in affect and emotion has productively crossed
disciplinary boundaries within and between the humanities, social sciences,
and sciences, but has not often addressed questions of literature and
literary criticism as such. The first of its kind, Palgrave Studies in Affect
Theory and Literary Criticism seeks theoretically informed scholarship
that examines the foundations and practice of literary criticism in relation
to affect theory. This series aims to stage contemporary debates in the
field, addressing topics such as: the role of affective experience in literary
composition and reception, particularly in non-Western literatures;
examinations of historical and conceptual relations between major and
minor philosophies of emotion and literary experience; and studies of
race, class, gender, sexuality, age, and disability that use affect theory as a
primary critical tool.

More information about this series at

http://www.springer.com/series/14653
 Amanda Bailey • Mario DiGangi
Editors

Affect Theory and

Early Modern Texts
Politics, Ecologies, and Form
Editors
Amanda Bailey Mario DiGangi
English The Graduate Center, CUNY
University of Maryland City University of New York
College Park, Maryland, USA New York, New York, USA

Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism

ISBN 978-1-137-57074-1    ISBN 978-1-137-56126-8 (eBook)
DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-56126-8

Library of Congress Control Number: 2017932756

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the
Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of
translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on
microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval,
electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now
known or hereafter developed.
The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this
publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are
exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information
in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the
publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to
the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The
publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.

Cover illustration: Triumph of the Virtues, Andrea Mantegna (1431–1506), Louvre INV
371. Photograph by Coyau © CC

Printed on acid-free paper

This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by Springer Nature

The registered company is Nature America Inc.
The registered company address is: 1 New York Plaza, New York, NY 10004, U.S.A.
 Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the inspired and inspiring scholarship of our contribu-
tors, the intellectual and affective rewards of editorial collaboration, and the
groundbreaking insights of those working in affect studies, without which
this volume would not have been possible.

v
 Contents

1 Introduction 1
Amanda Bailey and Mario DiGangi

Part I Embodying the Political25

2 Speak What We Feel: Sympathy and Statecraft 27

Amanda Bailey

3 Affective Entanglements and Alternative Histories 47

Mario DiGangi

Part II Affective Ecologies and Environments67

4 Weird Otium 69
Julian Yates

5 Self-Killing and the Matter of Affect in Bacon

and Spinoza 89
Drew Daniel

vii
viii Contents

6 Thinking Feeling 109
Benedict S. Robinson

7 Crocodile Tears: Affective Fallacies Old and New 129

Joseph Campana

Part III Affective Form153

8 The Feel of the Slaughterhouse: Affective Temporalities

and Marlowe’s The Massacre at Paris 155
Patricia Cahill

9 Spenser’s Envious History 175

David Landreth

10 Affective Contagion on the Early Modern Stage 195

Evelyn Tribble

11 Afterword: Thinking About Affect and Emotion

in Julius Caesar 213
Gail Kern Paster

Index223
 Contributors

Amanda Bailey Bailey, Professor of English at the University of Maryland,

is the author of Of Bondage: Debt, Property, and Personhood in Early Modern
England (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013); Masculinity and the
Metropolis of Vice, 1550–1650 (Palgrave, 2010), co-edited with Roze
Hentschell; and Flaunting: Style and the Subversive Male Body in Renaissance
England (University of Toronto Press, 2007). Her essays have appeared in
Criticism, Renaissance Drama, English Literary Renaissance, and
Shakespeare Quarterly, as well as in numerous edited collections, including
A New Companion to Renaissance Drama and The Oxford Handbook of
Shakespearean Comedy. She is currently working on a book about the rela-
tion between dramatic literature and political affect, tentatively titled
A Natural History of Politics: Shakespeare, Sympathy, and the Stars.
Patricia Cahill Cahill is Associate Professor of English at Emory University.
She is the author of Unto the Breach: Martial Formations, Historical Trauma,
and the Early Modern Stage (Oxford University Press 2008) and is currently
completing a book about tactility and affect, entitled Shakespeare’s Skins:
Surface Encounters in Early Modern Playhouses.
Joseph Campana Campana is a poet, scholar, and arts critic. He is the
author of The Pain of Reformation: Spenser, Vulnerability, and the Ethics of
Masculinity; two collections of poetry, The Book of Faces and Natural
Selections; and the editor with Scott Maisano of Renaissance Posthumanism,
forthcoming from Fordham UP. He is currently working on two projects,
The Child’s Two Bodies, a study of sovereignty and children in the works of
Shakespeare, and Bee, Tree, Child, which formulates new rubrics for the

ix
x CONTRIBUTORS

study of humans and nonhumans in Renaissance studies. He is the Alan

Dugald McKillop Associate Professor of English at Rice University.
Drew Daniel Daniel is Associate Professor of English at Johns Hopkins
University. He is the author of two books, The Melancholy Assemblage:
Affect and Epistemology in the English Renaissance (Fordham University
Press) and 20 Jazz Funk Greats (Continuum), in addition to numerous
articles on Renaissance literature, political philosophy, contemporary aes-
thetics, and music.
Mario DiGangi DiGangi is Professor of English at Lehman College and
the Graduate Center, CUNY, where he serves as Executive Officer of the
Ph.D. Program in English. He is the author of The Homoerotics of Early
Modern Drama (Cambridge, 1997) and Sexual Types: Embodiment,
Agency, and Dramatic Character from Shakespeare to Shirley (Pennsylvania,
2011), and has also contributed to several collections, including
Shakesqueer: A Queer Companion to the Complete Works of Shakespeare;
Love, Sex, Intimacy and Friendship between Men, 1550–1800; A Companion
to Renaissance Drama; and A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works: The
Comedies. He has edited Romeo and Juliet and A Midsummer Night’s
Dream for the Barnes & Noble Shakespeare and The Winter’s Tale for the
Bedford Shakespeare: Texts and Contexts series. He is working on a new
book, Affective Politics: Alternative Histories on the Early Modern Stage.
He has co-directed four NEH Faculty Humanities Workshops on
Shakespeare and has directed a Folger Shakespeare Institute seminar on
“Sexuality, Theory, History, Drama.”
David Landreth Landreth is Associate Professor of English at the
University of California, Berkeley. He is the author of The Face of Mammon:
The Matter of Money in English Renaissance Literature (Oxford University
Press, 2012) and various articles and essays.
Gail Kern Paster Paster is Director Emerita of the Folger Shakespeare
Library and Editor of Shakespeare Quarterly. Her books include The Body
Embarrassed (1993) and Humoring the Body (2004), and she has co-­
edited the collection Reading the Early Modern Passions (2004). She con-
tinues her research on the cultural history of the body and the emotions in
recent works.
Benedict S. Robinson Robinson is Associate Professor of English at Stony
Brook University. He is the author of Islam and Early Modern English
 CONTRIBUTORS xi

Literature: The Politics of Romance from Spenser to Milton (Palgrave, 2007)

and editor of John Webster’s The White Devil (Arden, forthcoming). His
essays have appeared in Shakespeare Quarterly, ELH, Studies in English
Literature 1500–1800, Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, and
elsewhere. He is currently completing a book-manuscript tentatively titled
Inventing Emotion.
Evelyn B. Tribble Tribble is Professor and Donald Collie Chair of English
at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. She is the author of
Margins and Marginality: The Printed Page in Early Modern England
(Virginia, 1993); Writing Material: Readings from Plato to the Digital Age
(with Anne Trubek, Longmans, 2003); Cognitive Ecologies and the History
of Remembering (with Nicholas Keene, Palgrave, 2011); and Cognition in
the Globe: Attention and Memory in Shakespeare’s Theatre (Palgrave, 2011).
She has also published articles in Shakespeare Quarterly, Shakespeare,
Shakespeare Survey, Shakespeare Studies, ELH, and Textual Practice, among
others.
Julian Yates Yates is Associate Professor of English and Material Culture
Studies at the University of Delaware. He is the author of some 30 essays
on Renaissance literature and culture and two books, Error, Misuse,
Failure: Object Lessons from the English Renaissance (University of
Minnesota Press, 2003) and What’s the Worst Thing You Can Do To
Shakespeare? (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), co-authored with Richard Burt.
His new book is entitled The Multispecies Impression.
 List of Figures

Fig. 4.1 Andreas Mantegna Pallas Expelling the Vices from the Garden
of Virtue, before 1503. Tempura on canvas.
Musée du Louvre. Paris 75
Fig. 4.2 Hans Holbein engraving, Thomas More’s “Truly Golden
Handbook” for “The Best State of a Commonwealth”
called Utopia, 1518 78
Fig. 6.1 The faculties of the soul according to Thomas Wright 116
Fig. 8.1 Berengario da Carpi, Jacopo. Isagogaebreues, perlucidae ac
uberrimae in anatomiamhumanicorporis. Bologna: Beneditcus
Hector, 1523. 6r (Courtesy: US National Library of Medicine) 165

xiii
 CHAPTER 1

Introduction

Amanda Bailey and Mario DiGangi

In the past decade, new approaches to embodiment, power, and

­materialism have transformed our understanding of the relation between
subjects and objects, agency and causation, the individual and the collec-
tive, and the somatic and the social. A broad range of interdisciplinary
work by scholars such as Laurent Berlant, Patricia Clough, Gilles Deleuze,
Lawrence Grossberg, Brian Massumi, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick has
contributed to the different strains of what is now commonly called
“affect theory”: a critical moniker given recognizable currency by the
2010 publication of The Affect Theory Reader, which features work either
written or directly influenced by these scholars. Drawing together new
research from the fields of literary studies, cognitive science, philosophy,
cultural studies, and political theory, The Affect Theory Reader signifi-
cantly sharpens and elaborates the conceptual distinction between emo-
tions, feelings that a subject is aware of and claims as his own, and affects,

A. Bailey (*)
English, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
e-mail: abailey7@umd.edu
M. DiGangi
The Graduate Center, CUNY, City University of New York, New York,
New York, USA
e-mail: mdigangi@gc.cuny.edu

© The Author(s) 2017 1

A. Bailey, M. DiGangi (eds.), Affect Theory and Early Modern Texts,
Palgrave Studies in Affect Theory and Literary Criticism,
DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-56126-8_1
2 A. BAILEY AND M. DIGANGI

intensities that generate physiological and environmental effects beyond

the boundaries of a singular subject. By privileging the word affect over
and above historically inflected terms such as humoralism, passion, senti-
ment, or sensibility, however, The Affect Theory Reader also signals its
exclusive investment in twentieth- and twenty-first-century cultural phe-
nomena and imaginative texts: notably, none of its contributors looks
further back into the past than World War II.
Offering a corrective to the presentism that has characterized the field
of affect studies to date, each of the chapters in Affect Theory and Early
Modern Texts: Politics, Ecologies, and Form illuminates the intellectual and
ethical stakes of charting the historical trajectory of affect—a trajectory
that has been long neglected.1 The analyses presented here do not simply
engage the findings of affect theorists to query the presuppositions of
early modern texts. Forging a new direction in affect studies, our con-
tributors leverage the insights of early modern writers to interrogate the
foundational premises of contemporary affect theory. In some instances,
our discoveries challenge the assumptions underwriting the dominant
scholarship in the field. At other times, we unearth heretofore unexamined
aesthetic, philosophical, and epistemological crossovers and continuities
among early modern and contemporary thinkers.
Although affect can be generally regarded as a transhistorical concept
describing the energetic transformation of a bodily state or capacity, affect
theorists have been largely invested in demonstrating the ways in which
analyses of affect can capture “the changing cofunctioning of the political,
the economic, and the cultural” in the contemporary world.2 Proposing
that affect studies has emerged in response to “a new configuration of
bodies, technology, and matter,” Patricia Clough, for example, regards
affect as the most salient critical lens through which to explore how con-
temporary society “aims at a never-ending modulation of moods, capaci-
ties, affects, and potentialities, assembled in genetic codes, identification
numbers, rating profiles, and preference listings, that is to say, in bodies
of data and information.”3 With this account of the scientific codes, con-
sumer spending data, and social tracking information characteristic of a
global capitalist economy, we are a long way from the agrarian, proto-­
capitalist economy of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century England.
The use of affect theory to diagnose the ills of late capitalism—
particularly the rise of neoliberalism—is widely shared. Influential exam-
ples include Dierdra Reber’s Coming to Our Senses: Affect and an Order
of Things for Global Culture, Brian Massumi’s The Power at the End of
 INTRODUCTION 3

the Economy, Lauren Berlant’s Cruel Optimism, Kathleen Stewart’s

Ordinary Affects, Ann Cvetkovich’s Depression: A Public Feeling, and
John Protevi’s Political Affect. Contesting the neoliberal faith in ratio-
nal and self-­interested choice, Massumi adduces affect as the “rabbit hole
… at the heart of the market.”4 Berlant’s account of cruel optimism—a
desire for something that actually thwarts the aim which that desire was
intended to fulfill—analyzes the “contemporary moment” in the USA and
Europe, as framed by the “retraction, during the last three decades, of
the social democratic promise of the post-Second World War period.”5
Kathleen Stewart, rejecting the terms “neoliberalism,” “advanced capi-
talism,” and “globalization” as too “totalized” to describe “a weighted
and reeling present,” explores ordinary life in the contemporary USA as
“a shifting assemblage of practices and practical knowledges, a scene of
both liveliness and exhaustion, a dream of escape or of the simple life.”6
Cvetkovich’s book—an attempt to “think about depression as a cultural
and social phenomenon rather than a medical disease”—emerged out of
the Public Feelings project, which “coincided with and operated in the
shadow of September 11 and its ongoing consequences—a sentimental
takeover of 9/11 to underwrite militarism, war in Iraq and Afghanistan,
Bush’s reelection,” and so on.7 Finally, in his account of political affect—
the “imbrication of the social and the somatic” as informed by relations
of material and ideological power—John Protevi examines three contem-
porary events: the Terry Schiavo right-to-die case, the Columbine High
School massacre, and the government’s response to Hurricane Katrina
in New Orleans.8 Like many of the other critics mentioned here, Protevi
illuminates affective politics as manifested in distinctively contemporary
forms of governmental, juridical, economic, and technological organiza-
tion, namely, biopower, neoliberalism, neoconservatism, and militarism.
On further reflection, it might seem strange that work on affect has
been largely restricted to the contemporary period, since, according
to Brian Massumi, affect is “a dimension of all activity” and of “every
event.”9 Indeed, most definitions of what affects are and what affects do
employ concepts such as “bodies,” “sensations,” “forces,” “intensities,”
and “events” that have no particular historical determination or location.
Moreover, along with other influential figures in the field, including, most
prominently, Gilles Deleuze, Massumi derives his account of affect as the
energetic transition in bodily states from the Ethics of late seventeenth-­
century philosopher Benedict de Spinoza:
4 A. BAILEY AND M. DIGANGI

By “affect” I don’t mean “emotion” in the everyday sense. The way I use it
comes primarily from Spinoza. He talks of the body in terms of its capacity
for affecting or being affected. These are not two different capacities—they
always go together. When you affect something, you are at the same time
opening yourself up to being affected in turn, and in a slightly different way
than you might have been the moment before. You have made a transition,
however slight. You have stepped over a threshold. Affect is this passing of a
threshold, seen from the point of view of the change in capacity.10

From this description, it is clear why Massumi regards affect theory as a

species of “process philosophy,” which is concerned with “understanding
the world as an ongoing process in continual transformation.”11 Other
theorists follow suit in describing affect as a general capacity of bodies as
they interact with the other bodies in their environment. According to
Seigworth and Gregg, affect is “synonymous with force or forces of encoun-
ter,” though affects are less likely to be “especially forceful” than “miniscule
or molecular events of the unnoticed.”12 Unlike emotions, affects are gener-
ally understood as “pre-individual bodily forces” or “impersonal intensities
that do not belong to a subject or object” but that inform the “co-motion
of relational encounter.”13 As the pastiche of phrases in the above sentence
suggests, and despite the frequent claim that affect resists “easy compart-
mentalisms,” affect theorists generally concur in their definitions of what
affects are and do.14 Although many more such definitions could be cited,
we offer these as representative of the consensus that affect is a dimension
of all activity and is active in any transindividual bodily encounter or event:
in this regard, affect has no predetermined social or cultural “content.” As
Massumi explains, “we’re in affect, affect is not in us. It’s not a subjective
content of our human lives. It’s the quality of a relational field….”15
While our understanding of affect derives from contemporary theo-
rists, our sense of what affect might mean and how it might function
is inflected, and at times altered, by early modern explorations of those
phenomena that fail to register as emotion—understood as the subjective,
embodied manifestation of the interface between individuals or between
individuals and their environment. For this reason, we turn our attention
to those experiences that bypass conventional expressions of passion (e.g.,
joy, rage, and fear) or that complicate paradigms of embodied sensation.
Moreover, the chapters collected here do not use affect to dissect con-
temporary culture. Rather, they use affect as a prism through which to
read early modern cultural, economic, and political phenomena, and as
 INTRODUCTION 5

a platform by which to address the historical and conceptual frameworks

underpinning affect theory. For instance, Julian Yates offers a pre-modern
“genealogy” of Berlant’s concept of “lateral agency” or weak sovereignty;
Patricia Cahill suggests that Marlowe’s Massacre at Paris exploits the sur-
face intensities that Massumi finds characteristic of the “affective hit”; and
Drew Daniel, who refers to Bacon and Spinoza as the “turbulent pre-
cursors” of contemporary affect theorists, traces the seventeenth-century
emergence of new paradigms of embodiment. Affect Theory and Early
Modern Texts thus reveals the abiding connections, as well as the con-
ceptual divergences, between early modern and current ideas about the
capacities of and interrelations among matter, power, and bodies.
Although the chapters in this volume consider representations of various
affective states in early modern texts, our authors set their sights beyond liter-
ary analysis. Each chapter opens up a new line of inquiry by elucidating how
early modern ways of knowing—via methods emerging from philosophy,
natural science, historiography, and political thought—anticipate and shape
contemporary ways of approaching and understanding affect as a distinct
phenomenon. The cultural history of emotion provides a foundation for
this project; nonetheless, the chapters collected here advance scholarship on
early modern emotion by focusing on the problems raised by philosophical
and imaginative contestations over where in the body, mind, and soul affect
resides; whether affect is natural or artificial; the possible ethical valence and
political efficacy of affect; how affect links humans to animals, vegetables,
and minerals; and, finally, the place of affect in forging new aesthetic modes.
More specifically, the chapters in this volume limn three major ways
in which questions of affect might be productively articulated with early
modern understandings of bodies, passions, and social relations. In the
remainder of this introduction, we will describe these approaches and
provide a brief account of how they engage with current work in both
affect theory and early modern scholarship. We do not, of course, intend
to construct a taxonomy of the wide-ranging modes that scholarship on
affect might take, or to suggest that any of the chapters fall neatly into one
of these categories: one of the hallmarks of affect theory’s interpretative
power is its resistance to categorization and disciplinary enclosure. Still,
we hope that it will be useful to identify the broad methodological and
conceptual moves that our authors make in thinking affect with, through,
and alongside of early modern texts. Toward that goal, we suggest that
affect theory can speak to early modern texts and culture in the following
ways: (1) affect can illuminate the role of embodiment in early modern
6 A. BAILEY AND M. DIGANGI

representations of political subjectivity and agency; (2) affect intersects

with recent interest among early modern scholars in ecologies and envi-
ronments, particularly the de-centering of human agency and subjectivity
in post-humanism; (3) affect can shed new light on the formal elements of
literary texts, as well as enhance our understanding of the social, political,
and physiological dynamics of theatrical experience.

Embodying the Political

Broadly conceived, political analysis has long been a staple of early modern
literary scholarship. Deepening and widening the sphere of the political,
the emergence during the 1980s and 1990s of new historicist, cultural
materialist, feminist, and queer approaches drew attention to the ways in
which early modern texts were shaped by the discourses and ideologies of
colonialism, nationalism, court patronage, political theory, gender, and
eroticism. In rejecting idealized and conservative notions of the universal-
ity of Renaissance literature (particularly Shakespeare) some noteworthy
studies from this period explicitly announce the critical turn to the analysis
of politics and ideology: for instance, the anthologies Political Shakespeare
(1985) and Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology
(1987), Jonathan Goldberg’s James I and the Politics of Literature (1983),
and Leonard Tennenhouse’s Power on Display: The Politics of Shakespeare’s
Genres (1986).16 Attesting to the theatricality of Renaissance sovereignty,
these and similar historicist studies have addressed the centrality of the
body in early modern political thought and practice, as manifested, for
instance, through the pervasive metaphor of the body politic; the spectac-
ularly public violence visited upon those convicted of treason; or Queen
Elizabeth’s rhetorical, sartorial, and performative deployments of her
femininity as emblem of monarchical authority. Moreover, much influ-
ential historicist and materialist scholarship has expanded the notion of
the “political” beyond matters of statecraft, court culture, and theories of
sovereignty to encompass the myriad ways of understanding how embod-
ied relations of power are defined, negotiated, resisted, and ­reconfigured
in early modern texts. Finally, a more recent wave of scholarship that
draws on political theology and on Giorgio Agamben’s theorization of
biopolitics (most influentially in Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare
Life) focuses on concepts such as citizenship, consent, ethics, and rights in
addressing the embodied experiences of collective life under early modern
sovereign power.17
 INTRODUCTION 7

Affect builds on these approaches by providing ways of thinking

through political relation and affiliation that foreground, as Amanda
Bailey writes in her chapter, the “aesthetic, the sub-perceptual, the quo-
tidian, and the non-discursive.” As we suggested above, contemporary
affect theorists have devoted significant attention to the political critique
of contemporary capitalism and neoliberalism. In pursuing those critiques,
affect theorists have developed useful accounts of the political as the field
of social practices in which “embodied” and “embedded” subjects experi-
ence somatic changes as they negotiate relations of “freedom and con-
straint, of individual and group, of subordination and hierarchy.”18 Hence,
in Politics of Affect, Massumi writes that affect is “proto-political” in that it
“concerns the first stirrings of the political, flush with the felt intensities of
life.” Relationality and change, which are inherent to affect in Massumi’s
view, are the foundational elements of a process in which felt intensities
emerge into the “‘properly’ political register—the arena of social order
and reorderings, of settlement and resistance, of clampdowns and upris-
ings.”19 Ann Cvetkovich similarly emphasizes that the goal of her analy-
sis of political depression is to find “public forums for everyday feelings”
in order “to generate new ways of thinking about agency.”20 In sum, an
affective account of politics will tend to emphasize not the grand narrative
but the everyday feeling; not the unidirectional operation of disciplinary
authority but the mutually impactful bodily encounter; not the singular
agency of an individual but the distributed agencies of a collective; not the
conscious articulation of political policies, doctrines, or schemes, but the
inarticulate stirrings of feeling or “affective cognition” that might move a
subject toward unforeseen affiliations, alliances, and actions.21
Drawing on these understandings of political affect, Amanda Bailey’s
chapter “Speak What We Feel: Sympathy and Statecraft” and Mario
DiGangi’s chapter “Affective Entanglements and Alternative Histories”
explore the affective bonds that inform different models of political con-
sent and agency in early modern plays and prose texts. Bailey considers
how “early modern belief in the existence of dispersed sympathetic forces”
informs the representation in King Lear of political obedience as driven by
impersonal and unconscious processes. Reading the circulation of “noth-
ing” throughout the play as an index of what Sianne Ngai calls “minor
affects,” Bailey bypasses moments of highly charged emotion in order to
focus on the way that political affections are constituted by and develop
in relation to natural, mimetic, sympathetic bonds. In response to Lear’s
demand for a declaration of political allegiance framed in terms of absolute
8 A. BAILEY AND M. DIGANGI

love for the father/king, Cordelia’s “nothing” and her subsequent insis-
tence that she loves Lear according to her “bond” implies that political
consent is based on natural sympathy as “an incipient condition of fellow-
ship.” Without converting “the latency of unactualized, dormant possibil-
ity” merely into a figure for repression, Bailey demonstrates how Lear,
Gloucester, Cordelia, and Edgar become “enmeshed in the collective
ambience of depravation,” as they are shown to become more capable of
the sympathy that provides the ethical principle for a just political order.22
Bailey’s account of competing models of political affect in the period thus
prompts a reconsideration of the role played by non-empathetic and non-­
epiphanic experiences that lie below the threshold of consciousness in
analyses of early modern structures of social and political power.
Like Bailey, DiGangi distinguishes the operations of emotion and affect
as they appear to motivate different forms of political agency in Samuel
Rowley’s history play When You See Me, You Know Me. Building on Brian
Massumi’s account of affect as a force of transindividual relationality and
change, DiGangi argues that the play contrasts Cardinal Wolsey’s emo-
tionally charged (and ultimately tragic) scheme to achieve singular political
glory with King Henry’s affective openness to a collaborative (and tonally
mirthful) style of rule. Rowley characterizes Henry as an unpredictable
amalgam of shifting moods and affective attachments. Henry’s passionate
nature at times interferes with his judgment and duties as sovereign; none-
theless, his indulgence of mirth and his openness to affective entangle-
ments with others make him a more effective ruler. Rowley’s play, DiGangi
argues, thus suggests that “historical” narratives, even those concerned
with the great figures and events of the national past, might meaning-
fully engage with the elusive movements of the trivial, improvisational, and
everyday: realms of experience productively illuminated by affect theory.

Affective Ecologies and Environments

Historically the term “ecology” has belonged to the province of science
and sociology. Yet over the past two decades “ecology” has emerged as a
key word of cultural theory indexing an approach that places the autono-
mous and individuated—read sovereign—human subject in a dense web of
enmeshed material practices that at once elude human mastery and expand
definitions of the social.23 Inspired by recent findings in the fields of quan-
tum physics, systems biology, and cognitive science, scholars like Bruno
Latour and Jane Bennett examine the ways various animate and inanimate
 INTRODUCTION 9

entities exhibit tendencies and transmit intensities, as each participant of a

dynamic network acts and reacts.24 Thus, ecologically minded scholars see
the collective as something other than “an organic whole that is greater
than the sum of its parts” (for instance, characterized as an ecosystem, a
word that has become associated with an outmoded conception of nature
as passive and inert). Rather, an ecological approach aims to describe the
symbiotic (and symbiogenetic) activities that characterize the “mesh” of
mutually determining bodies, objects, and contexts.25 The “mesh,” as
originally defined by Timothy Morton, is a “nontotalizable, open-ended
concatenation of interrelations that blur and confound boundaries at prac-
tically any level: between species, between the living and the non-living,
between organism and environment.”26 By offering an alternative to
essentialist ideologies of the natural and Nature organized around a series
of hierarchical exclusionary binaries, such as those between subjects and
objects, inside and outside, and humans and nonhumans, “ecology” prof-
fers a nonsubstantialist materialism that conceives of matter as “self-assem-
bling sets of interrelations.” “Ecology” thus encourages us to consider
ontology as a relational proposition, based upon both willed and involun-
tary momentum, that spawns “politicized intimacy with other beings.”27
Not surprisingly, the term “ecology” has played a key role for affect
theorists aiming to postulate new ontologies of matter and agency. Brain
Massumi, for example, is interested in devising new modes of perception
to account for our enmeshment in a universe composed of various agents
that, through their encounters with each other, produce complex reac-
tions and unpredictable effects. More generally, an ecological perspective
has come to underwrite a notion of affect as a transubjective or inter-
subjective mode which, no longer anchored in any individual—or even
human—body or perceptual apparatus, may be expressed in terms of
forces, vibrations, or propensities. In accordance with Spinoza’s definition
of affectus as signaling the ability of all matter to affect and be affected,
an ecological perspective on affect attends to the “prepersonal intensity
corresponding to the passage from one experiential state of the body
to another and implying an augmentation or diminution in that body’s
capacity to act … (with body taken in its broadest possible sense to include
‘mental’ or ideal bodies).”28 Importantly, the term “ecology” illuminates
the role of affect as potential. As Morton writes, “collectivity is always
to come, since it addresses the arrivant”: nonhuman life forms whose
strangeness is irreducible and that coexist by means of symbiosis and com-
panionship.29 Affect, Rachel Greenwald Smith observes, is essentially “the
10 A. BAILEY AND M. DIGANGI

conscious registration of ecological situatedness—if, by ‘ecological’ we

mean the interconnection of living and nonliving things.”30
The notion of ecology advanced within affect theory marks a crucial
nexus of contemporary and early modern understandings of affect as col-
lective, impersonal, and nonhuman phenomena. In sixteenth-century
England, Galenic humoralism provided the dominant model for explain-
ing and experiencing what Gail Kern Paster aptly describes as the “ecol-
ogy of the passions,” by which early moderns understood “the passions
and the body that houses them in ecological terms—that is, in terms of
that body’s reciprocal relations to the world.”31 The reciprocity between
body and world was “psychophysiological” in that it encompassed emo-
tion, sensation, and somatic experiences.32 The Galenic framework, which
held sway through the end of the seventeenth century, provided men and
women with ways of recognizing their experiences of the world as located
neither in nor beyond the body but between the body and the world. Built
into this early modern humoral framework is what Niklas Luhmann would
characterize as a general-systems perspective on the relation between bio-
logical systems and their environs. Humoralism understood the interre-
lated components of mind, psyche, soma, climate, food, and air in terms
of the material manifestations of what we have come to call the ecological
conditions of social life. The chapters collected here take seriously the
pre-Cartesian understanding of the impressionability of the self and the
interdependent relation of body and mind. For instance, Lyn Tribble and
Patricia Cahill note that those early modernists who objected to the prac-
tice of playing focused on the disorderly somatic responses that theatri-
cal experiences elicited in their viewers. These writers, Tribble and Cahill
demonstrate, were not merely engaging a metaphor but providing an
accurate description of the bodily sensations of playgoers immersed in an
affective theatrical environment.33
At the same time, several of our authors distinguish between the contin-
gent and spontaneous ecologies referenced in current affect theory and the
implied organicism of humoral theory, whereby “emotion is understood as
a feature of the natural world, and is represented as fully shared between
animate and inanimate objects within that world… [such that] the passions
belonged fully and seamlessly to the order of nature.”34 In contrast to the
notion of world-fitting mind and mind-fitting world paradigms, whereby
the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, chapters by Julian Yates,
Drew Daniel, Benedict Robinson, and Joseph Campana explore alterna-
tive epistemologies by which early moderns made sense of those experi-
ences that eluded—or even seemed to undo—the seamless order of nature.
 INTRODUCTION 11

In his chapter “Weird Otium,” Julian Yates examines the ways political
thinker Thomas More and poet Edmund Spenser attempt to capture what
“transpires within and across the subtlest of shuttling intensities,” which
includes accounting for “the minuscule or molecular events of the unno-
ticed. The ordinary and its extra.”35 As Yates shows, More and Spenser’s
interest in the dissociated state of otium—an ambient disengagement from
our routines, exemplified by the vegging out of humans or the grazing
and cud-chewing of livestock—indexes an early modern awareness of eva-
nescent and incorporeal encounters among bodies that resonates with
Morton’s mesh: the coexistence of interdependent life forms that cannot
be totalized into an organic whole. Insofar as a state of otium opens one
up to intimacy with strangeness and strangers, which in this case takes pre-
cedence over holistic belonging, this form of agency, Yates argues, exists
in an oblique relation to orthodox definitions of serious or productive
political practice. Both Utopia and The Faerie Queene explore the diffi-
culty faced by the elite subject in evaluating and embodying those forms
of virtuous leisure that might serve the Commonwealth. This difficulty is
compounded by the way in which subjectivity itself is constituted through
distributed practices of work and pleasure in which “we may understand
our kinship with animals, plants, and creatures that live, labor, and grow.”
In his chapter “Self-Killing and the Matter of Affect in Bacon and
Spinoza,” Drew Daniel reveals that in a pre-Cartesian world, in which
emotions were themselves viewed as material entities, affects—like all
forms of matter—were seen as exhibiting complex self-organization,
reflexivity, consciousness, and the capacity to act spontaneously. For
natural philosophers and early scientists of vitality, as Daniel shows, self-­
destructive affect poses a limit case for materialist accounts of the pas-
sions that guided humoral explanations of suicidal thinking and madness.
Examining the seventeenth-century decline of humoral science, Daniel his-
toricizes affect in the context of emergent vitalist accounts of the passions.
Working closely with Francis Bacon’s History of Life and Death (1627)
and Benedict de Spinoza’s Ethics (1677), Daniel argues that the problem
of self-killing prompts reflection on “the possibility that the body harbors
a purely material appetite for death, a force hostile to the survival of the
conscious self.” According to Daniel, Bacon describes the putrefaction
caused by the body’s “vital spirits” in terms that resonate with contempo-
rary accounts of affect; at the same time, the volition Bacon attributes to
these embodied spirits imbues them with a kind of emotional intentional-
ity. Whereas humoral science and faculty psychology had subordinated the
vital spirits to the rational soul, Daniel reads in this new drama of agential
12 A. BAILEY AND M. DIGANGI

internal forces a “fundamental ontological disparity between plural spirits

and singular Persons.” In Spinoza’s Ethics, suicidal desire flies in the face
of the principle of conatus, or the natural striving for self-preservation
within all beings. Drawing on Sianne Ngai’s account of tone as a text’s
“affective bearing,” Daniel observes that when Spinoza discusses suicide,
his writing becomes marked by feelings of disgust and consternation that
suggest the emotional effort necessary to uphold the belief in the impos-
sibility of voluntary self-destruction. Although Spinoza confidently assigns
all acts of self-destruction to “external causes,” his strange admission that
the body of a suicidal person takes on “another nature” that cannot be
represented as an idea in the mind appears to violate the mind/body par-
allelism upon which his Ethics rests. Daniel reads this contradiction as the
symptom of a complex epistemological shift from pre-modern to modern
ways of theorizing the material composition and function of the passions.
Benedict Robinson, in his chapter “Thinking Feeling,” provides a his-
torical perspective on affect as “the vanishing point of thought and expe-
rience” by demonstrating how seventeenth-century thinkers anticipate
contemporary debates about the relationship among emotions, embodi-
ment, and cognition. Historically contextualizing the concepts deployed
by contemporary affect theorists, Robinson points out that the under-
standing of affects as automatic and visceral, or as pre-cognitive bodily
forces, rests on a questionable distinction between affect and emotion. By
turning to early modern debates about emotion as a kind of cognition,
Robinson offers a new genealogy of affect that attends to an expanded
role for the imagination and an increased attention to the place of pas-
sion in perception and cognition. In his analyses of late scholastic fac-
ulty psychologies, notably Thomas Wright’s Passions of the Minde (1604)
and Thomas Willis’s Two Discourses Concerning the Soul of Brutes (1683),
Robinson posits a shift from a long-standing (though variously inflected)
scholastic theory of the passions as motions of the soul involving evalua-
tion and judgment of a situation to later theories of mechanism and vital-
ism. Despite this shift in emphasis, the passions continue to be seen as
“the fluxes and refluxes” of bodily “spirits.” Although Robinson does not
argue that analyses of affect in early modern texts is invalid, he produc-
tively unsettles the current presumption that affect and emotions are fun-
damentally distinct concepts.
Joseph Campana in “Crocodile Tears: Affective Fallacies Old and New”
suggests that investigations of early modern sensitivity to affect as an ecolog-
ical phenomenon should not merely affirm but encourage an interrogation
 INTRODUCTION 13

of our current investment in ecology. Through a sustained investigation of

the historical valence of the proverb “crocodile tears,” a phrase that appears
in a wide range of early modern sermons and sonnets, diatribes and devo-
tional texts, astronomical treatises and anti-theatrical screeds, as well as in
Edmund Spenser’s The Faerie Queene, Campana explores the ways this trope
indexes the ethical dimensions—and limitations—entailed by imagining
the distribution of emotion and sentience to a variety of life forms. Asking
that we go beyond “simply asking if animals experience affect or emotion,”
Campana proposes that “we might instead ask whether the affirmation or
denial of affect, especially nonhuman affect, constitutes an ethical stance.”
Thus Campana frames his discussion around a series of fallacies relating to
affect: the ethical fallacy that recognition of shared affective capacities serves
as evidence of deep interrelation; the fallacy of inclusion that suggests that
the expansion of capacities to an ever-widening range of creatures or the
erosion of borders between forms of matter overturns hierarchies of life
forms; and the fallacy of sentience that imagines that an escape from human
reason and speech into vibrant animality loosens the grip of human excep-
tionalism. Ultimately, proverbial crocodile tears speak volumes about “the
complicities and contradictions lurking beneath the surface of invocations
of the ethics of affective entanglements and animal identifications.”

Affective Form
One persistent concern of affect theory has been whether the turn to
affect affords new insight into aesthetic form.36 By considering the role of
form in capturing and conveying particular kinds of experiences, scholars
like Eugenie Brinkema and Sianne Ngai elucidate the ways imaginative
works mediate and modulate relationships between body and mind, and
sensation and cognition. Importantly, those critics who use affect as a
heuristic to trouble the presumption that form is passive, inert, and stable
consider affect in light of the emotions that films and literary texts arouse
in their viewers and readers. Thus they emphasize the analytic potential of
affect as a means by which to apprehend that which lies outside the frame.
Affect inheres in disruptions of meaning or resistance to legibility that
signals, on the one hand, “the unexpected and the unthought” and, on
the other hand, “the visceral, immediate, sensed embodied, excessive.”37
For this reason, much has been written about the ambience of the filmic
or literary text. As Timothy Morton explains, “ambience, that which
surrounds on both sides, can refer to the margins of a page, the silence
14 A. BAILEY AND M. DIGANGI

before and after music, the frame and walls around a picture.”38 Affective
form may be regarded as contingent and nonhierarchical, not unlike
those queer textual forms theorists describe as made up of “an open mesh
of possibilities, gaps, overlaps, dissonances, and resonances.”39 Tellingly,
both Morton and Ngai use the word “tone” to describe the aesthetics of
intensity.40
Chapters in this volume by Patricia Cahill and David Landreth explore
the ways that poetic and dramatic form encourages readers and audiences
to apprehend history in affective rather than cognitive or intellectual
terms. Through the particular generic, rhetorical, and linguistic conven-
tions they employ to register trauma, memory, and history, early modern
authors mobilize form as a medium for a “historical presentness”: that
which has “not yet emerged as recognizable event or idea or even well-
defined emotion, and as such … conveys a sensation of history as affective
discomfort, cognitive ‘noise.’”41 One of the experiences that registers in
dramatic literature as discomfort or noise, as Cahill suggests, is the sense
of historicity or the present-day feeling of being a historical subject. In
her chapter, “The Feel of the Slaughterhouse: Affective Temporalities and
Marlowe’s Massacre at Paris,” Cahill argues that Christopher Marlowe’s
play primes its audience to be receptive to the interrelation among the
words spoken by actors, the material space of performance, and the physi-
cal (in this case somatic) environment of theatrical consumption. Helpful
here is Timothy Morton’s notion of “ambient poetics,” whereby a play
is organized around what its characters do or do not feel rather than
who they are as recognizable historical figures.42 The affective charge
of Marlowe’s play, in regard to both its representation and reception, is
ambient in that “like perfume or a ‘tint,’” it acknowledges affect as that
which steadily comprises the surrounding atmosphere, ethereal yet pal-
pable.43 Illuminating the elasticity of historical time in The Massacre at
Paris, Cahill argues that Marlowe’s re-staging of the recent past “activates
and animates this history” for playgoers, immersing them in a disorient-
ing affective and temporal experience that impedes any straightforward,
identifiable political identification or agenda. Drawing on Massumi’s asso-
ciation of affective intensity with cutaneous surfaces, Cahill shows how
Marlowe’s play provokes the feeling of historical reenactment by repeat-
edly confronting playgoers with the human and animal skins that materi-
ally convey the violence and suffering brought about by political terror.
Through its “disturbing assemblages of sound vibrations, animal/human
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
This book was produced in EPUB format by the Internet Archive.

The book pages were scanned and converted to EPUB format

automatically. This process relies on optical character recognition,
and is somewhat susceptible to errors. The book may not offer the
correct reading sequence, and there may be weird characters, non-
words, and incorrect guesses at structure. Some page numbers and
headers or footers may remain from the scanned page. The process
which identifies images might have found stray marks on the page
which are not actually images from the book. The hidden page
numbering which may be available to your ereader corresponds to
the numbered pages in the print edition, but is not an exact match;
page numbers will increment at the same rate as the corresponding
print edition, but we may have started numbering before the print
book's visible page numbers. The Internet Archive is working to
improve the scanning process and resulting books, but in the
meantime, we hope that this book will be useful to you.

The Internet Archive was founded in 1996 to build an Internet

library and to promote universal access to all knowledge. The
Archive's purposes include offering permanent access for
researchers, historians, scholars, people with disabilities, and the
general public to historical collections that exist in digital format. The
Internet Archive includes texts, audio, moving images, and software
as well as archived web pages, and provides specialized services for
information access for the blind and other persons with disabilities.

Created with hocr-to-epub (v.1.0.0)

The text on this page is estimated to be only 15.50%
accurate

REYNOLDS HISTORICÄE QENEALOGY CGLLECTION

ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 833 00863 4492 I
 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014
https://archive.org/details/archivfurstammun09rheu
 rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr^ r K R N R R R N R R R R R R N
NNRNRRRRRRNNRRNRRRRRNRNRNRKNRRRR
RNRRRRRNRRRRRKRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Rrchiu für Stamm- und
Wappenkunde. ivionatsfdirift zur Feftlegung uon Familiengefdiiditen
und Familiemuappen * ♦ zum Rustaufdi für
FamUiengefdüchtsforfcher, Wappen, ♦ * Exlibris- , Siegel- und
Münzfammler, foune für heraldifdi********* genealogifdie Uereine.
♦*»♦**♦*♦ Organ des Roland Uereins zur Förderung der Stamm-,
Wappen- und Siegclkunde. Redigiert uon Uogt und Corenz R
Rheude. 9. Jahrgang 1 90S — 1909. Druck und Uerlag uon Gebr.
Uogt Papiermühle S.-R. 1909.
The text on this page is estimated to be only 11.31%
accurate

1780917 Rlle Rechte uorbehalten. Flachdruck aus diefer

Zeitfchrift nur mit' befonderer Genehmigung geftarter.
 Inhalts-Verzeichnis. Ahnentafel des Wolf Christof von
Güttenberg 142. An unsere Mitglieder 179. Alte und neue Ziele der
Genealogie 131, 147, 163. Armee Friedrich des Grossen 65. Beitrage
zur Stammkunde der Adels-Geschlechter der Provinz Posen 6, 40.
Beiträge zur Stammkunde Westpreussisjher BürgerGeschlechter S,
54. Briefkasten 15, 31, 48, 62, 79, 94, 112, 129, 144, 160, 175, 190.
Buchdruckbeilage, Zur, 109, 187. Bücherschau 13, 30, 44, 61, 76,
93, 111, 127, 144, 159, 174, 183. Bürgerlisten der Stadt Ahlsfeld
116. Dachenhausen, Zur Stammtafel von, 125. Dreyhaupts
Beschreibung des Saalkreises 180. Eine Fundgrube für
Familienforscher 1. Erfurts Eingesessene durch 5'/.2 Jahrhunderte
149. Exlibrisbeilage, Zur, 29, 76. Exlibris, heraldische (mit Textillustr.)
43. Familiennamen, Die chinesischen Sl. Familiennamen aus
gedruckten und ungedruckten Quellen der Rolandsbücherei 16, 32,
48, 64, 80, 96, 114, 130, 146, 162, 178, 194. Finster 55. Genealogie
von Personen und Geschlechtern 1, 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 115, 131,
147, 163, ISO. Geschichte der Familie Tescher, Teschner, Döschner,
Deschner 165. Gierstedt, Die Gemeinde, bei Gross-Fahner in Gotha
33. Grabdenkmäler, Die, in der Kirche zu Mariesreuth (Oberfr.) 140.
Gubener Familien, Alte, 115. Handschriftliche Eintragungen über die
Familie Hertel in einem Biblischen Lexikon 184. Heraldik-
Wappenkunde 10, 29, 42, 56, 76, 92, 109, 126, 143, 156, 173, 137.
Hundertmark, die Wappen der Familie 56. Kirchen, Die zwanzig
ältesten in Berlin, die Hofund Garnisonkirche in Potsdam und ihre
Kirchenbücher 86. Kunstbeilage, Zur (m. K.-B.) 12, 29, 42, 60, 76,
92, 109, 126, 143, 15S, 173, 1S7. Kuriositäten-Kabinett, Heraldisches
(mit Textbildern) 13, 29, 92, 110, 126, 143, 15S, 174. Langwitz-
Längwitz 39. Miscellen 32, 4S, 63, 79, 95, 113, 146, 177, 191.
Pustkuchen, Fr. Chr., Beyträge zu den Denkwürdigkeiten der
Grafschaft Lippe 72, S2, 102, 121. Raadsel van Nijmegen 97. Rätsel,
Das von Nymwegen 98. Schröter, von Dr. Johann und seinem
Geschlecht 17. Standeserhebungen, Deutsche, aus dem Jahr 1907
49. Standeserhebungen, Nachträge 1900—1906 52. Teuffei, Zur
Geschichte der Tuttlinger 182. Thielisch — Tilesius 56. Tilisch,
Tillisch, Thielisch, Thielisch von Rüdigersdorf, Tilesius, Tilesius von
Tilenau (die Familiengeschichte der sächsischen) 2, 23, 35. Ueber
den Ursprung des Familiennamens Welker 1S6. Von drei
Dichterbrüdern und ihrem Geschlechte 135. Welcker, Beiträge zur
Genealogie und Geschichte der Familie 27, 101. Welcker, Familie aus
Hessen 99. Welcker, aus Wetzlar 100. Wie Wappen in
Wappenwerken entstellt werden können 156. Zuständigkeit, Die, des
königl. Heroldsamtes gegenüber den Gerichten bei Entscheidung
über das Recht zur Führung adliger Prädikate in Preussen 8S. Zwei
merkwürdige Trachtenbücher 10. Verzeichnis der Mit, Beck,
Amtsrichter, Ravensburg. Berger, Assessor, Leipzig, Brandvorwerkstr.
28, III. Bergmann, Willi., Buchhdl., Wien. Bötticher, Arno,
Amtsgerichtsrat, Frankfurt a. O. Carben, C, Mkt. Berolzheim a.
Altmühl. Dachenhausen, A., Freiherr von, Brüssel. Deschner, A.,
Diakon, Wölfis bei Ohrdruf. Dungern, Dr. Freiherr von, Privatdozent,
Graz. Fieker, Dr. Hans, Assessor, Hannover-List. rbeiter des »Archiv«.
Finster, C. H. A., Obercassel-Düsseldorf. Grofebert, Otto, Landrichter,
Graudenz. Güttenberg, K., Freiherr von, Oberst a. D., Würzburg.
Habicht, M. E., Lucka S.-A. Haken, R. von, Kunstmaler, Berlin W. 27.
Härtung, B., München. Has, Dr., Stabsarzt, Diedenhofen. i Haupt,
von, München.
 — IV — Hundertmarck, Kapitän-Leutnant, Kiel. Kauffungen,
Dr. Kunz von, Archivar, Metz. Kiesskalt, E., Postsekretär, Nürnberg.
Koerner, Bernhard, Dr. jur., Regierungs- Assessor, Mitglied des
.Königl. Preuss. Heroldamts, Berlin. Lucas, Gustav H., Wiesbaden.
Nachtigal, F., Pastor, Giiterglück. Oberländer, K., Pfarrer,
Frauenbreitungen. Pabst, Referendar, Darmstadt. Verzeichnis der
Kunstbeilagen und Exlibris Dr. Hans Sternherger (II. Golzinger gez.)
lieft 1. St. Georg Schutzpatron der Rittersclfa'ft (O. Roick gez.) lieft
2. Exlibris, 1) Dr. Hans Menzel, 2) Johannes Junge, i) Dt. II. Beit/kc
(Nr. 1 und 2 von Rheude, Nr. 3 von II. Krimig gez.) Heft 2. Die von
Schaumberg fränk. Uradel (von R. v. Haken gez.) Heft 3. Stammtafel
der Familie Kol) (von Stabsarzt Dr. M. Kob) lieft 3. O. F. Sohle Nachfl.,
Hamburg-Traben a. M. (von Rheude gez.) Heft 4. Urkunde, von In
Hier, und reforiu. Konsistorien der Grafschaft 1 lanau I left -1. Rfidt
von Gollenberg, Wappen (von Golzinger gez.) Heft 5. Exlibris, 1)
Charl. Kassler, Reichsfreiin von Garnerschwang, (von Roick gez.) 2)
M. Kortmann, Berlin 1906 (von M. Kortmann gez.) Heft 5. Petiscus,
M., Oberleutnant, Halberstadt. Poseck, Wald, Gross-Lichterfelde.
Schluttig, O., Oberleutnant, Feld-Art. 27, Spandau. Swinarski, von,
Posen. Teuffei, Paul, Finanzrat, Stuttgart. Thielisch, A.,
Gerichtssekretär, Ohlau. Unbescheid, Dr. Herrn., Studienrat, Prof.,
Dresden-A. 1 Welcker, E., Godramstein. Welcker, Carl, Düsseldorf.
Stammtafeln des »Archiv« (Roland). Wappenkalender für 1909 (von
M. Kortmann gez.) Heft b. , Die Habsburger (von O. Roick gez.) Heft
7. Zwei Neujahrskarten ( 1) von Kortmann, 2) von ! Schinipke gez.) I
left 7. Die von Schaumberg i.fand. Darstellung, (von R. v. Haken
gez.) I left S. Stammtafel von Dachenhausen (von A. v.
Dacheuhauseri) Heft S. Fresko aus der Dommikanerkirche zu
Regensburg (von L. Rheude gez.) Heft 9. Scheurl und Tucher,
Wappen (von Golzinger gez.) ! Heft 10. ( Ordensritter der
Marienburg (von O. Roick gez.) Heft 11. Hasenjaeger, Wappen (von
L. Rheude gez.) Heft 12. Exlibris Wentzel (von R. v. Haken »ez.) Heft
12.
 Sach-Register zum Archiv für Stamm- und Wappenkunde
IX. Jahrgang 1908—1909. Alle Namen, welche sicli auf einer Seite
wiederholen, sind nur einmal angeführt. St.-T. — Stammtafel. Die
Zahlen bezeichnen die Seiten. Aarbog 58 Aaskow 48 Abbe 4S Abbeg
48 Abbt 48 Abel, von 65 Abele 48 Abendroth, von 48 Abraham 48
Abramovski 48 Accularius 64 Achenbach 181 Achenwall 4S
Ackelmaun 4S Acker 116 Ackermann 48 Acoluth 48 Acrel, von 48
Adam 48 Adame 149 Adams 48 Adansohn 48 Addison 4S Adel 101
Adelsheim, von 48, 54, 143 Adelung 48 Adermann 16 Adersbach 193
Adler 16, 48, 61 Adlersholm, von 48 Adolphi 48 Adoltsheim, von u.
zu 48 Adrian 48 Adrianus 48 Aeckermann 48 Aehnelt 4S Aepinus 48
Aeschardus 181 Aeschel 1S1 Affsprung 4S Agker 116 Agricola, von
4S Agullo 126, 144 Ahlemann 4S Ahlert 48 Aichinger 190 Ajello 7
Alber 48 Albert 40 Alberti 73, 126, 1S1 Albertrandi 48 Albertus 48
Albhardt 48 Albini 4S Albrecht 16, 32, 48, 149, 161, 178, 194
d'Albret 30 Aldthen 116 Alchen 4S Alemann, von 4S Alendorf 116
Alendorff 116 Alevin 48 Alexvvangen, von 48 Algar 116 Allenbumen,
von 149 Allendorf 116 Allendorff 116 Alles 116 Allius 48 Allmenröder
27 Almon 48 Alon 101 Alphen, von 48 Alsbach 116 Alsen 48
Alströmer 48 Alten, von 48 Altenstadt 116 Altermanii 73 Althaus, von
14 Althof 73 Altmann 48 Altmüller 116 Alttmann 116 Altus 48
Alvensleben, von 48, SS Alxinger 4S Alzeie 102 Alzgerodt 149 Aniand
48 Ambrosy 48 Amelinus 73 I Amelunck 48 | Amelung 48 !
Amelunxen, von 52 j Amende 48 Amendorf, von 181 Ampach, von
64 Amsel 193 Amstel 65, 67 An:thor 140 Andersohn von Andisshorn
64 Andler 32, 64 Andiä 64, 181 Andrea 32, 162 Andreae 16, 64
Andreas 116 Aridree 64 Andres 116 Andresberg, von 27, 28 Anft 64
d'Ange 177 Anger 64 Angelroth 149 Angenelli 71 Anhalt, Prinz
Dietrich von 67 Anhalt, Fürst Johann Georg von 70 Anhalt, Prinz
Moritz von 66 j Anquetil du Perron 64 Anschietz 116 Anschitz 116
Anschütz 64, 116 Anstey 64 Antonius 181 Antwerpianus 73 Anze 101
Anzen 73 Apel 64 Apelt 64 Apenburg 64 Apfelstedt 149 Apiarius 73
Apitsch 64 Apizius 73 Appach 35 Appelius 73, 116 Appelmann 64
Apponyi 31, 44, 61, 76, 93, 111 Aquilins 64 Aragon 61 d' Arbogast
64
 II Arbunke ()4 Archangels 64 Arco, von 64 Ardel 73 Ardels
73 Ardelt 64 Aren 116 Arenber^k 116 Arendt 64 Aretino 64 Argyll,
Herzorr von 51 Annbriister 116 Armin 94 Arniirns 181 Arndt 64
Amecke 64 Arneinann 64 Arnim, von 64, 86 Arningeii 64 Arnold 48,
62, 64, 79, 94, 95, 101, 113, 149, 171, St.-T. Kob Arnoldsen, St.-T.
Kob Arnoldt 113 Amolt 48, 95 Arnschwanger 64 Arnstedt, von 176
Arnstein, von 64 Arras 64 Artz 116 Artze 116 Artzt 64, 116 Arzelecki
64 Arzt 116 Asch, von 64, 192 Asche vor. Heiniburg 94 Asmann 129
Asmann, von 129 Aspennont, Graf 47 Assebnrg 67 Assmann 16, 64,
129, 145 Assmann, von 16 Astenrodt 116 Astenstedt 64 Aster 64 An,
von der 113, 160 Auel 116 Anenmüller 64 Auerbach 175 Auerswald
64 Auerswald 64 Augsburg 64 Aulock-Mielecki, von 7 Anstel 64
Austen 64 Austenried, von 64 Austigal 64 Avenario 178 Avenarius 1,
73, 146, 194, St.-T. Kob Avenbeck 64 Averani 64 Avianus 149 Avisou
64 Awel 116 Axmann 129, 149 Axt 64, 114, 159 de Aydra 64
Aystoszy 63 B. Raatzcl 116 Babatius 193 Babst 116 Bach 64, 192
Bach, von 54 Bachenschwanz 139. Bacher 64 Bachmann 49, 64, 149
Backhaus 64, 73 Backhusen 73 Backus 149 Bacmeister 64 Bacon v.
Verulam SO de Racnlard d' Arnaud SO Bac/ko, von SO Bade 73, 80
Badehorn SO Badeker SO Badeinann 73 Baden 80 Badendieck SO
Bader 116, 149 Bad ins 193 Bär 77 «■ Baer, von 23 Bafler gen. Lütz,
St.-T. Kob Bahner 172 Bahnse 80 Bahr SO Bahr, St.-T. Kob Bahrdt 80
Bahrt 116 Baier 32, 80 Bailif 116 Bake 49, 73, SO Baibier 55 Baldauf
SO Baldersheim, von SO Baldewin, von 1S1 Baldinger SO Baldwin
149 Balgheim, von 1S4 Bahn SO Balla, von SO Ballabene 80
Ballermann SO Ballerstedt 80 Ballhorn SO Balthasar SO Baltzer 80
Balz 116 i Balze 102 Bamberg 92 Bamberger 80 Bambes 116
Bampes 1 16 BainptoT SO Barns 153 Bändel, von 77 ßandemer, von
69 Bannewitz SO Bapst 116 Baratier 80, 182 Batrekhaus 14
Barckholtz 9, 55 Bardeleben, von SO, 12S Bardiii 80 Bardt 116
Bärensprung, von 80. Bärenstein, von 80 Barfuss, von SO Bäricht 1
Bariug 32 Barkhaus 73 Balkhausen 74 Barkholz 55 Barkowski SO
Barnickel SO Barnstädt SO Barry 55 Barssy 55 Barßy 9 Bart 'SO, 11h
Bartel 79 Bartelli 4 Bartelt SO Bartenstein SO, 1S2 Bartenstein, von
SO Barth SO, 115, 116, 149 Barth, von 1S1 Barthel SO Barthelemy
SO Barthez 80 Barthold SO Bartholdi 80 Bartholdt 80 Bartholoinäi SO
Bärtlino 13 Bärtling, von 13 Bartlitz 190 Bartmann 116 Barlram SO
Bartsch 115, 193 Bartt 116 Bartzsch 115 Baruschke 160. 176 Bäsch
80 Bäsel SO Basener von Baslineller SO Bashuysen, van (>1 Bass
190 Baß 1S2 Bassermann 45, 175 Bässler SO Baslineller 1S1 Batsch
SO Batz SO Batzel 116 Bauch 80 Baudich SO Baudiiii SO Baudis, von
80 Bauer 16, 32, SO, 116 Bauernfeind ' 1 16 Baum 80 Baumann 80
Baumberg 56 Baumeister SO Baumeyer 149 Baumgart SO
Baumgarten SO, 1S2 Baumgartner SO Baumgärtner SO ßäuml 114
Baumach 63 Baur 32 Bauscher 80 Banse 1S1 Bäutzmann SO Bavarus
1S2 Bax SO Bayer 32, 80, 194 Bayern, Prinz-Regent von 62 Markgraf
von Bayreuth 70 Baysen, von SO Beatie SO Beaufort, von 66
Beaulien-Marconnay , von St -T. von Dachenhausen Becher SO, 149
Bechius SO ßechler 150 Bechtold 80, 116 Bechtoldt 116 Bechtolt 116
Bechtoltt 116 Beck 12, 31, 80, 128 Becke 150, 1S2 Becken 194
Beckensteiii, von SO Becker 32, SO, 114, 115, 116, 181, 1S2, Ul i
Beckh SO Beckher SO, 193 Beckmann 96 Becmann 96 Bedeker 96
Beek 96 Beer 96, 116 Beer, von 96 Beerwolf 33 Beese 96 Beetz 116
Beffard 96 Belier 35, 39 Behielt 193 Behm 193 Behr 96 Behre 74
Behrentzen 96 Belunauer 96 Beichel 90 Beichlingen, von 96 Beier 96
Beirich 96 Beitsch 115 Beitzke 29, 144 Beitzsch 115 Beker 32, 1S5
Bekesch 96 Bekk 96 Beider 69 Belitius 74 Belitz 96, 115 Belkow 96
Belleberg 96 Bellermann 150 Belling 71 Belling, von 9r> Bellinger
116. Bellniann 96 Bellmont, von 150 Beiloy, de 96 Belovv 67 Below,
von 96 Beltz 150 Beltzer 96 Beltzig, von 1S1 Beize 9 Belzuig 96
Beilade 96 Benadt 96 Benckendorff 111, 112, 127, 144, 175
Benckendorff, von 193 Bencker 182 Benda 96 Bendel 116 Bendelin
96 Bendell 116
 III Bender 116 Bend ix 96 Beneken 96 Benekendorf, von 96
Benekendorff 1 1 1 Benes 74 Benewitz 96 Beiikendorf 127
Benkendorff 111, 127, 144, 175 Benkendorp 111, 127, 144, 175
Benkowitz 96 Benneinann 96 Benner 116 Bennewitz 96 Bennighaus
56 Bensen 96 Benther 1S1 ßenteenhausen 96 Benze 101
Benibttecius, St.-T. Kob Berbig 96 Berbisdorf, von 96 Berchtram 102
Berck 116 Bercke 115 Berckenthal, von 96 Berckheim, von 54
Berckhover 1 16 Berdholdt 116 Berdnx 116 Berengar 96 Berg, von
96 Berg, vom 190 Berge, von der 96 Bergen 115 Bergen, von 193
Berger 32, 34, 96, 115, 145, 150, ISO, 1S1 Berger, von 1S1 Bergler
96 Bergmann 32, 56, 74, 96 Bergold 96 Berhtelman 102 Berisch 96
Berka 61 Bcrkelmann 161 Berkholt 55 BeikhoMz 9 Berkholz 96 Berlin
96 Bermann 101 Bennrard 94 Bern, Dietrich von 26 Bernd 96 Bernde
96 Berndes 1S2 Berndis 96 Berndt 96 Berndtson 96 Bern egger 96
Bernet 116 Bernhard 116 Bernhard 1., Graf Bernhardi 96 Bernhardini
96 Bernhardt 96, 116 Beinhart 116 Bernhnsser 96 Bernier 96
Bernklau 96 Bemoulli 96 Bernstein 1S2 Berquin, de 96 Berretus 161
Mersch 116 Bersinanns 96 Bertelsmann 140 Berthold 96, 116, 150
Bertholdt 116 Berthoud 96 Bertkow, von 96 Bertold 116 Bertram 96,
181 Bertsch 116 Bertuccius 116 Bertuch 96 Berwolt 55 Berze 101
Besch 96 Beschorner 96 Besecke 96 Beseke 96 *" Beseken 96
Besser 96 Besserer 32 Besskow 96 Bestenbostel 96 Bestian 116
Bestnchef-Rnmin, von 96 Beteke 96 Bethe 16, 96 Bethke 96, 115
Betke 9, 55 Betthaus 96 Bettin 114 Betz 116 Betze 116 Beuchel 114
Beudtl 116 Beulwitz, von 171 Beuschel 114 Beiist, von 114 Beutel
114, 116 Beuthen 92 Beuttel 116 Bevern, Prinz von 66 Bevilaqua
114 Beyenbach 116 Beyer 32, 114, 116, 146, 150, 162, 194 Beyer
14b Bcylstein 116 Beyme 114 Beython 193 Beza 110 Bezae 116
Bhartzsch 114 Biber 114 Biberstein 32, 114 Bibra, von 1 1 4 Bibrach,
von 114 Bichat 114 Bichel! 116 Bichris 116 Bicker 116 Bickingk 117
Bidenkapf 116 Bieck 181 Biedekapp 116 Biedencopf 116 Biedenkapf
116 Biedenkopf 116 Biedenkopf! 116 Biedermann 16, 56, 127
Biegaiiski 10 Bieganski, von 42 Biegelerus 114 Biegold 1S6 Biegott
114 Biehner 115 Biehre 74 Bieland 114 Bielefeld 79, 92 Bieler 114
Bielitz 114 Bienbach 116 Biener 114, 174 Bienge 116 Bierdürhpfel,
St.-T. Kob Biere 74 Bierling 114 Bierman 116 Biermann 46, 116, 150
Bierwolff 193 Biesenbach 190 Bigkingk 117 Bilfinger 114 Bilgerin 116
Bilgrim 150 Billerbeck 71, 74 Bilz 114 Biria 116 Binder 114 Bindewald
116 Bindhoff,' von 1 14 Bing 116 Binge 116 Binhose 150 Binkebank
150 Birckestock 116 Birckenstock 116 Birgkennstuck 116 Birkener
116 Birkenstock 116 Birkhahn 114 Birkholz 114 Birkholz, von 1 14
Birkler 114 Birkner 114 Birnbaum 114 Birnmuss 150 Birnstiel 150
Birss 23 Bischof 22 Bischoff 150 Bischwang, von 114 Bismarck 114
Bismarck, von 114 Bismarck, Fürst von 160 Bisnig, von 114 Bissigel
47 Bissing, von 51 Bitau 114 Bi taube 114 Bitter 74, 79, 116
Bitterbeck, von 1 14 Bittner 63 Biwald 114 Blair 114 Blandina 16
Blank 114 Blankenburg, von 114 Blankenheim 20, 114 Blankensee
69, 70 Blaukensee, von 114 Blantz 119 Blanx 119 Blasebalg 114
Blasebalg, von 114 Blau 34 Blaubach 114 Blauenfels, von 63 Blauert
34 Blazek 26, 38 Blech 32, 114 Blechschmidt 114 Bleese 116
Bleidemeister 1 16 Bles 116 Biese 116 Blesem 114 Bleul, von 114
Bleuine 116 Bley 114 Bliwernitz 114 Block 114 Block, von 1 14
Blockshagen 114 Bloes 116 Blössnitz 150 Blüh er 114 Blum 114, 116
Blumann 114 Blumberg 114 Blume 74, 112, 114, IIb, 129 Bliimeke
114 Blümeke, von 114 Blumenau 114 Blumenbach 114 Blumenberg
114 Blumenröder 114 Blumenthal 16, 114 Blumenthal, von 114
ßlumm 116 Blummengeber 116 Blüniher 114 Bninski 7 Bobbart, von
114 Bobenzahn 150 Boccage, du 114 Bochmann 114 Bock 114, 193
Bock, von 114 Bock u. Polach, von 62 Bock von Wülfingen, St.-T. von
Dachenhausen Bockenheimer 111 Böckeris 116 Böckerix 116
Bockfleth 150 Bockhauss 74 Bocking 117 Böcking 117 Bockius 116
Bockshammer 114 Bockwitz 116 Böckmann 114 Boddener 117 Bode
114, 150 Bode, von 182 Bodeck, von 114 Bodeker 96, 114 Bödeker
114 Boden 74 Bodenhausen, von 114 Bodenstaff 190 Bodenstein
129, 145, 162 Bodewitz 150 Bodhecker 114
 - IV Bodmann, von und zu 54 ßodinus 182 Boeck, von 175
Boecking 117 Bochmer 182, ISO Boeuigke 182 Boese 1()!3 Boetius
182 Boetz lld Bog 150 Bogdanich 130 Bogener 130 Boguslawski 7
ßohenuis 182 Bohle IM Bohlius im Böhm III Böhme 50, 114, 115,
150 Böhmer 115, 130 Böhmer, von 189 Bonn 130 Bohne 9
ßohnenberger 130 Böhner 130 Bolmsack 130 Bohr 130 Bohrer 56
Böliringer 94, 129 Bohse 181 Boineburg, Reichsgraf von 150 Boing
130 Bojanowski, von 42 Bojar, von 71 Boje, 130 Bok 32, 101 Bök 32
Bökel 130 Bola 21 Bolberitz 130 Bolbritz, von 130 Boldemann 130
Boleye 116 Bo!f"56 Bolhorn 130 Bolhöver 74 Bolle, St.-T. Kob
Bollmann 130 Bollo von Borshittau 111 Bolte 130 Bolten 130 Boltz
116, 130, 193 Bomaiin 127 Bombach 130 Bombo 130 Bomlicher 74
Bondini 130 Bone 102, 130 Bone, von der 130 Bonhard 116 Bonhai
tt 116 Bönicke 130 Bonin 66, 70 Bonin, von 127, 130 Bonis 116
Bonix 116 Boniz 116 Bonnet 130 Bonstiidt 67 Bonz 130 Boor, de 130
Bora, von Borastns 130 Borchold 150 Borck 67, 116, 130, 194 Borck,
von 130 Börckenstock 116 Börger 130 Bork 113, 130 Borke, von 110
Börike 130 Borkhausen 130 Borlerus 130 Born 130 Boruhoni 110
Borne, von dem 1 30 Bornemann 130 Börner 110, 130, 150
Bernhardt 1 Ui Bornheinrich 130 Bornmann 116, 130 Bornstedt 70
Bornstedt*' von 130 Boro u ski 130 Borrmann 5(), 146 Bosch 146
Horsdorf 146 Borstel 146 Börstel I4d Borstell, von 140 Bortefeld, von
146 Bortz 146 Bös 116 Bose 76, 146 Böse 130 Bosecker 79 Boseith
117 Bosenberg 146 Bosse 146 Bosse, von 6S, 146 Bosseck 146
Bossecker 79, 94, 113 Bossler 146 Bostel, von Bostell 145
Botenstein, de 145 Bothen 146 Bothmer, von 146 Bott 146 Bottani
146 Böttcher 96, 114, 130 Bottenhorn 117 Botthillier de Rance 146
Bötticher 74, 86, 114, 146, 1S1 Böttiger 130, 150 Böttinger 49
Böttner 130 Bötzinger, St.-T. Kob Bouchholz 146 Bourbon, Isabelle-
Ferdinande de 61 Bourbon - Sizilien , Prinzessin Maria lmmaculate
von 78 Boutiu 150 Bovius 74 Boxberg 146 Boxberg, von 146 Boy,
von 146 Boye 193 Boyle 146 Boys 146 Boytin, von 146 Boz 76
Braasche 146 Brachmann 1 1 5 Brach städt 1S1 Brachvogel 146
Bradäus 74 Bradke, von 144, 174 Bradtke, von 126 Brahz 146 Brake
82, 146 ßrakeiihausen Bram 117 Brambach 150 Bramtn 117 Brand
74, Mo, Brand, von MO Brand von Lindau Mo Brandenburg Mo
Brandenburg , Markgraf Friedrich von 70 Brandenstein, von 146, 1SS
Brandes 66, 112, 129, 146 Brandhofer 1 17 Brandhoff 117
Brandhöffer 117 Brandis 129, 151, 181 Brandiss 150 Brandt 146, 150
146 150 146 117 146 162 , 102 Brandt, von Braiidthofer Braus 117
Braut 140 Brasch, von Brassander Bräu 162 Brauer 1 1 7 ßraiimaun
162 Braumüller 32 Braun 66, 117, 150, 162 Braun, von 150 Braun,
von, und Wartenberg 162 Braungard, St.-T. v. Dachenhausen
Bräunlich 162 Brauns 74 Braunschweig, von 162 Braunschweig,
Herzog Erich von 23 Braunschweig, Prinz Ferdinand v. Braunschweig
66 Braunschweig, Prinz Franz von 68 Braunsweiler 3 Brautlachts 74
Brecheis 162 Brecheumacher 1 14 Brecht 162 Bredel 162 Breden,
von 162 Bredelo 193 Bredenfeld 162 Bredenkamp 162 Brederlow,
von 162 Bredow 66, 69 Bredow, von 69, 162 Brehm 162 Brehmen,
St.-T. v. Dachenhausen Brehmer 79 Breidenstein 162 Breitenbach
150 Breitenbach, von 150, 162 Breitenfeld 102 Breithaupt 19, 60,
150, 162, 185 Breitkopf 175 Bremer 162 Bremer, von, St.-T. von
Dachenhausen Brenitz 162 Brenkenhof, von 162 Brenner 162
Brentano 127, 144, 159, 162 174 Brescius 162 Bresgott 162 Bi essler
102 Brestewin 162 Bretschneider 162 Brettin, von 150 Brettsclmeider
162 Biet zu er 102 Breuer 162, 192 Breymann 179 Briceke, de 162
ßrieglcb 102 Bliesen, von 41, 176 ßriesenmeister 162 Bneting 162
Brinckmann 74 Blinken, von der 162 Brinkmann 102, 191 Brisson
162 Brix, von 63 Brixen, von 102 Brochlos 139 Brock 113, 150, 193
Brock, von 17S Brocke 162 Brockhaus 17 Brockhausen 74 Blocks 117
Brodführer, St.-T. Kob Brodhagen 162 Brodkorb 162 Brodowski, von
162 Bröffel 74 Brögker 162 Brombeer 117 Brombehr 117 Biömel 162
Bronikowsky 71 Bronikowsky, von 150 Bronst 162 Broscheit, St.-T.
Kob Bröseke 74 Bröske 162 Brösske 1 15 Brown 162 Bruccatius 162
Bruchholz 162 Bruchlei 117 Bruchley 117 Brüchner 56, 79, 80
Brüchting gen. Schmidt 181 Brück 18, 46, 47 Briickmann 150
Brückner 37, 56, 150, 162 Brugdam 117 Brüggemann 74, 162
Brüggemeyer 72, 74 Brüggen, thor 162 Brühl 162 Brühl, von 162
Bruhm 162
 — V Bruhn e 9 Brüll 117 Brummer 162 ßrünicli 162
Brimnigk 162 Brunk 162 Brunkorst 150 Brunneniann 182 Brunner 16,
12S, 129, 162, 181, 1S2. Brunquell St.-T. Kob Bruno 6 Brun rieh 6
Brunstein 162 Brusko 162 Briissei 162 Bryx 63 Bübbert 178 Bube
182 Bucelin 163 Biicheler 31 Buch 17S, 193 Buch von, 17S Buchbach
181 Büchel! 116 Bucher 178 Buchführ 178 Buchhammer 181
Buchheim 178 Buchholz 178 Buchler 17S Büchler 16, 31, 32 Büchner
178 Büchner 150, 178 Büchner, von 1S2 Bucholtz 74 Bucholz 150
Buchspies 138 ßlichspiess 138 Buchwald, von 17S Buck 178 Bucking
117 Bücking 117 Bucris 116 Buddaeus 182 Buddelmann 178
Buddenbrock 69 Buddenbrock, von 178 Buddendorf 17S Budeuer
117 Budenner 117 Buder 178 Buechler 31, 32 Buektin 101 Buer 116
Bues 117 Bueseck 117 Buesecke 1 17 Buffius 178 Buffleb 34, 35
Biigcking 117 Bugrucker 178 Bühl 178 Buhle 178 Bühle 178 Buhler
182 Buhlinann 178 Buhrieh 117 Büky 178 Buler 117 Bulgarien, Fürst
Ferdinand von 30 Bulgarien, König von 164 ßüll 178 Bülow 68 Bülow,
von 52, 54, St.-T von Dachenhatisen Bülow, Fürst von 159 Bülow,
Graf von Dennewitz 54 Buls 178 Bülten 178 Bummicke 9 Bummike 9
Bünau, von 178 Bundschön 178 Bundschuch 178 Bungers 178
Bünnerwergk 178 Bunt 117 Bunte 74 Bünting 74 ßunz 178 Bnrchard
16. 74, 96, 178 Burchart St.-T. Kob Burche 117 Burckhardt 32, 178
Burckhart 17S Burckersrode, von 181 Burg 80 Bürger 1S1 Bürger
178 Burggraf 74 Burghagen, von 178 Burghard 150 Burghart 80
Burgold 19 Burgsdorf, von 178 Buri, von 178 Burkersroda, von 178
Burkhardt 178 Burlage 178 ßurmann 178 Burow 178 Burnicker 178
Burscher 178 Burse 178 Bursian 178 Busch 175 Busch, von der 177
Buschbeck 178 Busching 178 Buschiiis 182 Buschmann 74 Buseck
117 Buseck, von 178 ßusmaan 178 Buso 75 Bussche- Ippenburg, v.
d. 53 Busse 75 Bulle 181 Busseck 117 Bussrus 182 Büthner 63
Bütner 74 Buttel 178 Büttner 16, 36, 63, 96, 146, 178, 182, 193
Büttstedt 150 Butturlin 178 Buvemann 178 Buxbaum 178 Buxdorf,
von 178 Buxtehude 178 Buze 76 Byembach 116 Byempach 116
Byngc 116 Byrkenstock 116 Cabanis 17S Cabrit 178 Cacault 178
Cadell 178 Caesar 178, 182, 192 Cahlenus 182 Caillard 17S Caith
178 Calchenneck 178 Calckmann 75 Callenberg 182 Callenfels 15
Callisen 178 Callmann 194 Calovius 194 Callow 162, 194 Calve 194
Calvins 194 Camasch 66 Carnell 117 Camerarius 194 Cammerhof
182 Camoens, von 194 Campomanez, von 194 Cancrinus 75 Canitz,
von 194 Cannot 194 Cantagiesser 1S2 Capelle 75, 192 Capitanus
194 Capito 194 Cappel 117, 194 Cappes 117 Caprivi, Graf von 160
Caps 150 Caraccio, de 194 Carben 16, 113, 114 Carl 80, 194
Carlowitz, von 53, 88, 194 Carmen 114 Carmien 146 Carmina 130
Carpzov 194 Carpzow 64, 80, 162, 181 Carrach 182 Carsten 75
Carter 194 Carstian 75 Cartheuser 182 Carus 194 Carzzow 194 Cäsar
177 Caselius 194 Caspari 194 Caspart 32 Casseburg 193 Cassius 146
Castell, Graf 140 Casti 194 Castilla 61 Casting 75 Cathemann 75
Cato 75 Caulbel 194 Caulwel! 194 Causa 117 Causse 194 Cawel 194
Cedrowski 8 Cellanus 117, 182 Cernitze 194 Cerotus 182 Cerusius
182 Chabaneau 46 Chalzack, von 194 Chanay 58 Chantreau 194
Charpentier, von 194 Chemnitz 194 Chemnitzer 194 Cherubinus 161
Cheruscia 61 Chessel, von 194 Chlebowski 8 Chodeclos de Laclos
194 Chodowieky 194 Chop 194 Chopins 194 Chosignon, von 71
Chramer 117 ' Chreinitz 194 Christ 117, 194 Christian! 194
Christianus 75 Christmann 194 Christofferson 194 Christoph 194
Chrushore 117 Chydenius 194 Chimcze 55 Chuntze 9, 55 Cittelitz,
von 194 Clacke 194 Claluza 117 Clappekiste 194 Claproth 194 Cläre
194 Ciasing 75 Claus 194 Clausii 117 Clausing 75 Clausnitz 194
Clausnitzer 194 Clauss 194 Clauswitz 182, 194 Claute 194 Claviger
182 Cleige 75 Clemann 194 Giemen 194 Clemens 194 Clemens, von
150 Clemens VI. Papst 161 Gemme 150 Clemmenbergk 150 Cless
194 Cleve 49 Cliffon 58 Clinge 150 Clizzer 194 Cludius, St.-T. Kob 194
Cluser 194 Clüser 194 Clutz 194 Clüver 75 Cober 117 Coberg 117
Cobrigk 117 Coburg 1 17
 VI Herzog Ernst II. v. SachsenCöburg-Gotha 7S Coccäus 75
Cocceji, von 194 Codi 75 Cocus 100 Cohen 194 Cohn 148 Cölbe 193
Coldiz 194 Coler 194 Colems 1S2 Cölestinns 194 Collignon 71 Colling
194 Collini 194 Collins 194 Cölln, von 77, 194 Colloredo 194 Colinann
1130 Cöllnitz, von 63 Cöln, von 75, 194 Colonis 194 Colonner, von
194 Comte, Le 160 Conditt 193 Conqnista, de la 194 Conrad 194
Conrad i 194 Conring 194 Conta, von 194 Conte 194 Contins 182
Convent 194 Copins 75 Copp 117 Coppel 150 Coppius 194 Corregio
5 Correrus 75 Cortreyns 1S2 Coschwitz 182 Coss 115 Coste 182
Costerns 75 Gothmann 75 Cotins 75 Cotta 182 Crahmer 1 17
CraTiier 32, 80, 114, 117, 162, 178, 193, 194 Cranach 14, 18, 47,
144 Cranichfeld 35 Cranz 60 Cranziiis 75 Craß 117 Crasse 115
Cratinns 1S2 Cratz 115 Cratz, von 1S1 Crauel 146, 17S Cregel, St.-T.
Kob Crellinuns 1S2 Creppon 194 Cressac, de 30 Creta 75 Cretidter
117 Crentz 67 Creutzing 182 Croborn 193 Crockendorff 150 Cron
150 Cronberger 1 IS Cronemeyer, St.-T. von Dachenhausen Croix, de
la 192 Crnel 75 Cru»ot 75 Crnll 1S1 Cnise, von 13 Crnsins 1, 75
Crntheini 150 Cuhlnieier 74 Culeniann 159 Gulletou 129 Culmann 75
Cnniberland, Herzog von 127 Cuno 182 Cnntz 75 Cnntzel 117 Cnrd
129 Cnrio 150 Curthinaniip'117 Curtius 73, 75 Curtmann 117 Cuttins
75 Czainowski 9 Czanner 62 Czeledecki 56 Czertich 55 Czettn'z 70 D.
Dach 135, 193 Dachenhausen, von 45, 125, 188, St.-T. von
Dachenhausen Paclteröden, von 150 Dahlhausen S2 Dalberg, von
150 Dalwig 117 Dallwig 117 Dame 9 Damm 117 Damm, von 127
Danckwärts, St.-T. von Dachenhausen Dänemark, Prinz Gustav von
51 Daniel 150, 182 Dankrede 130 Darmstadt, Erb-Prinz von 67
Darinstadt, Georg von 67 | Dassel, von 29, 45, 93, 111, j 127, 159,
1SS Daube 117 Dauber 117 Daubert 150 Dautzenrodt 117
Dautzcnroidt 117 Dawint 117 Decher 117 Decimator 193 Decken,
von der, St.-T. j von Dachenhausen Dedekind 150 Dederich 16
Degenkardt 150 Degenkolb 169, 171 Dehne 193 Deichet t 16
Deichmann 16, 1S2 Deinert 56 Deker 32 Delitzsch, von 181 Delus 4
Demcke 79 Demuth 1S2 Denner 1S1 Dennius 82 Densing S2
Dennstedt 150 Deunstedt, von 150 Deuso 31 Densso 16 Depp 117
Derschau, von 193 Deschner 165, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173
Dessau, Prinz Eugen von 70 Dessau, Fürst Leopold von 68 Dessow
66, 68 Destouches, von 62 Deterdink 82 Detmering, St.-T. von
Dachenhausen Deutsch 193 Deutzenroth 117 Devrient 77, 78
Deyerlein 150 Deyling 194 Dickel 117 Dickhardt 117 Dickhart 117
Didel, St.-T. Kob Diderici S2 Dieck 117 Diecker 117 Dieckhartt 117
Dieder, St.-T. v. Dachenhausen Diegel 117 Diehl 116, 117, 120 Diehm
117 Diel 117 Dielauss 4 Diele 117 Diell 117 Dielle 117 Dielsch 4
Diem 117 Diemer 16 . Dienstbach 117 Dientzbach 117 Dieren 63
Dierer 159 Diericke, von 6S Dießkau, von 1S1 Dieterich 16, 162
Dietmann 1 Dietrich 6, 117 Dietsch 169 Dietz 93. 117 Dietze 117
Dietzel 135 Dietzschler 117 Digel 117 Digell 117 Dilbins, St.-T. Kob
Diler 102 Dilisch 4 Dillenius 32 Dilliger 138 Diinpfel 32, 94 Dinßbach
117 Dippel 117 Dippmann 30 Diöszeghi 145 Dioszeghy 176
Di(5szeghy, von 145 Dioszegi 145 Dioszegy 145 Diözsegi 162
Discheler 117 Ditterich 117 Dittlers von Dittendorf Ii Dittmer 193 Ditz
117 Ditz v. Kupferberg 18 Dives 1S1 Dyele 117 Dyll 117 Dobareuth,
von 172 Döbbers 150 Dobelyn, von 150 Dobeneck, von 141
Dobenecker 61, 127 Döbener 117 Döbler 56 Döbner 117 Dobrzycki 7
Dbbschutz 36 Döding 82 Doenhof 67 Doerfling 67 Dohm 82 Dohna
66, 68 Dohna, Burggraf zu 45 Dohna, Graf zu 67 Dölme 115 Donat,
von 52 Donatus 193 Donnert 115 Donny 56 Dolgen, von 150 Doli
117, 135 Dollmeyer 117 Dolsius 182 Doltius 1S2 Dorfelt 39 Dorff er
193 Döring 115, 117, 150 Doringer 117 Döringk 1 15 Dörner 117
Dornmann 117 Dorpowki 6, 7 Dorrie 82 Döschuer 165, 173 Doser
150 Drachstadt 181, 193 Dralle 32 Drechsler 1S2 Drcckmeyer 82
Dreier 193 Drepper 82 Dresanus 150 Dreschner 190 Dressler 150
Drewitz 115 Drevvord, von 150 Dreyer 82 Dreyliaupt 145 Dreyhaupt,
von 180, 181 Dreyssig 181 Dridorf, de 100
 VII — Driebitz 175 Driessen 69 Droege 15, 31 Dröge 15,
16, 31, 83 Droop 18S Drosler 20 Drost 103 Drvberg, von 150
Du'back 115 Dubenscheich 117 Dii fei 83 Drifft 150 Duffour von
Feronce 53 Dühren, von 103 Dtincli 117 Düncli 117 Diinche 117
Dnncker 14 Dungener 117 Dungern, Frli. von 45, 46, 131, 147, 163
Dunges 171 Düngk 117 Dunin 6 Dur 117 Dürer 63, 150, 160 Dürfeid
114, 1S1 Düring 16, 32 Düringen SIS Dürre 146 Dürrfeld S3
Durweitzen 117 Dutschler 117 Dutzenrodt 150 Duvernoy 180 Dwell
103 E. Ebbinghausen 83 Ebelin 101 Ebeuretter 33, St.-T. Kob
Eberbacli 150 Eberbach, von 150 Eberhard 16, 162 Eberhardt 32
Eberlein 150 Ebertus 83 Ebenvin 101 Echter 31 Eck 45 Eckardt, von
181 Eckart 47 Ecke 115 Eckel 117 Eckend orpius 83 Eckhard 117
Eckhardt 56 Eckmühl 143 Eckstein 117 Edelnig 117 Edelmann 162
Edling 117 Edlingk 117 Egenholf 16 Egenoff 16 Egenolf 16, 32
Egenolph 16 Eggert 176 Eggert, von 103 Egnolff 16 Ehrenberg, von
63 Ehrlich, St.-T. Kob Eiben 83 Eichenauer 145 Eichinger 16 luchler
5b Eickstedt, von 62 Eiffler 56 Eigenholff 16 Eigman 117 Eigniann
117 Eigner 43, 44 Eilbel 166 Eilniar 104 Einierinann 117 Eingell 117
Elnhausen, von 181 Einmann 117 Einsiedel, von G5 Eisele 114
Eisenach 67, 117 Eisenberg 182 Eißentraut *17 Eitner 70 Ekher ISO
Ekkehart 102 Elbert S3 Elbing 02 Elenheinz 32 Elers 182 Eiert 193
Elisabeth, die heilige 61, 12S Ellenberger 1S1 Ellinger 150 Ellinghaus
56 Ellrich 1S2 ! Eisner 56 Eltinger 19 Elvers, von 62 Elvers-Bietgast,
von 62 Enibhard 117 Etubhardt 117 Einershofen, von 183 Einhard
117 Emhardt 117 Emmerich 101, 103 Einrieb 117 Ende 115 Ende,
von 05 Frhr. vom Ende 1S1 End eis 117 Enderß 117 Endres 117
Engel 16, 115, 117 Engelbostel von 30 Engelbrecht 112, 113, 181,
193 Engelhard 117 Engelhardt 117 Engellhard 117 Engelmau 150
Engels 177 Engelschall 1S2 Engering 83 Engetingen 83 Engmann
117 Engmann 117 Ennders 117 Elingmann 117 Eppeinsheim 102
Eppenheimer 102 Epstein 94 Erasmi 103 Erb-Brcckhausen 83 Erbach
45 Erbe 117 Erck 117 Eickel 117 Erff 150 Erfurt 56 Ergel 182 Erhard
150 Eringeshusen, de 46 Ermanius S3 Ermel 117 Ermell 117 Ermisch
64, 80, 162 Ernst 117 Ernst August, Herzog von Weimar 12S Ernst
der Fromme von Sachs.-Ootha 128, 145 Erp-Brockhausen 83 Erschel
182 Eschenbach 56, 138 Eschwege, von 137 Eseler 117 Eseller 117
Eßler 117 Etling 117 Ettling 117 Etzel 193 Eucken-Addenhausen von
50 Eulenburg, Gräfin zu 50 Euler 117 Euller 117 Eullner 117 Eulner
117, 167 Evinus 182 Eward 35 Exter, von S3 Ey 79 Eyfimann 117
Eyman 117 Eymerer 117 Eymerher 117 Eymerman 117 Eyrnig, St.-T.
Kob Eysen 115 Eysenkremer 117 Eysennach 117 Ezzelnigen 102 F.
Faber 16, 32, 150, 189 Fabri 150 Fabricius 83, 1S2, 193 Fach 151
Fahius 117 Fahrenheit 193 Falck 117, 193 Falkenberg 9
Falckenhainer 117 Falckenheiner 117 Falkenhainer 1 17 Falsch 150
Farvvych 83 Fasant 117 Fasel 114 Fasold 150 j Fasolt, von 193 j
Faul! 117 Faulwurst 117 Fay 117 Feclienbach, von 143 Federau 193
Fehrenbach 61 Fehrmann 193 Feigel S3 Feilitzsc'h, von 16, 02 Feiser
117 Feldhauß 117 Feldpush 117 Feller 115, 117 Felsch 1S2 Feltmann
117 Fenderer 117 Fenner 117, 151 Fensterer 151 Fentzke 55 Ferber
117 Ferdinand II., Kaiser 95, Ob Ferdinand, Prinz 66 Ferentz 5(>
Fernau 117 Fernhorn 151 Fernne 117 Fester 134 Fetter 194 Feußer
117 Fey 117 Feyerabend 193 Feyser 117 Feyßer 117 Ficinus 115
Ficker 120, 145 Fiddeler 117 Fideller 117 Fiebiger 56 Fiecker 40, 129
Fiedeler 1 17 Fiedler 56, 1S2 Fieker 14, 30, 77, 79, 94, 113, 12S,
129, 160, 190 Fielitz 115 Fienck 117 Fiengk 117 Fiescher 117 Figken
129 Fikher 32 Fili 117 Filtz 115 Finck 67, 117 Fincke 117 Fingerhutli,
St.-T. Kob Fingke 117 Fink 117 Finke 83 | Finkenstein 162
Filikenstein, Graf von 70 Finster 55, 56, 115 Fintzel 129 Fischbach 83
Fischer 16, 32, 62, 56, 83, 96, 117, 130, 140, 151, 162, 175, 17S,
183, 191, 193 Flauaus 117 Fleischbein 127 Fleischbein von Kleeberg
127 Fleischer 182 Fleischhauer 151 Flammenkampf 83 j Flemink 102
i Flemming 115
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade

Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and

personal growth!

textbookfull.com