0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views3 pages

Guide-Effective Issue Monitoring

The document outlines a systematic approach for effective issue monitoring, self-assessments, and follow-up to enhance audit processes. It includes three phases: tracking and validation of issues, client self-assessments, and strategic follow-up and escalation, emphasizing the importance of ownership and psychological safety. Additionally, it provides practical tips, templates, and a team action plan to ensure timely remediation and accurate reporting.

Uploaded by

Ibrahim Aqeel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views3 pages

Guide-Effective Issue Monitoring

The document outlines a systematic approach for effective issue monitoring, self-assessments, and follow-up to enhance audit processes. It includes three phases: tracking and validation of issues, client self-assessments, and strategic follow-up and escalation, emphasizing the importance of ownership and psychological safety. Additionally, it provides practical tips, templates, and a team action plan to ensure timely remediation and accurate reporting.

Uploaded by

Ibrahim Aqeel
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Guide: Effective Issue Monitoring, Self-Assessments & Follow-Up

Objective: Establish a proactive system to track audit findings, validate remediation,


and empower clients to self-identify risks.

Phase 1: Issue Tracking & Validation

1. Standardize Issue Logging:


o Mandate consistent issue descriptions (e.g., "Weakness + Risk + Root
Cause").
o Tool: Centralized tracking system (e.g., AuditBoard, TeamMate, Excel).
2. Set SMART Remediation Plans:
o Require owners to define:
§ Actions (concrete steps)
§ Deadlines (≤ 90 days for high-risk issues)
§ Evidence required (e.g., screenshots, policy updates).
3. Validate Closure:
o Test evidence (don’t take "it’s done" at face value).
o Red Flag: Issues closed with "process updated" but no staff training.

Phase 2: Client Self-Assessments (CSA)

4. Design Purpose-Driven CSAs:


o Scope: Focus on high-risk areas (e.g., financial controls, compliance).
o Structure: Use simple questionnaires (Yes/No + evidence requests).
o Example: "Are vendor contracts reviewed annually? Attach sample
review logs."
5. Facilitate Honest Reporting:
o Position CSAs as improvement tools (not "gotchas").
o Offer training sessions to clarify expectations.
6. Review & Challenge:
o Cross-check CSA responses against existing data (e.g., past audits,
incident reports).
o Key Question: "Why does this control gap exist if self-assessed as
'effective'?"
Phase 3: Follow-Up & Escalation

7. Proactive Monitoring:
o Monthly check-ins with issue owners (15 mins/video call).
o Tool: Automated reminders 14 days before deadlines.
8. Escalate Strategically:
oLevel 1 (7 days late): Email owner + manager.
o Level 2 (14 days late): Notify senior leadership.
o Level 3 (30+ days late): Report to Audit Committee with root-cause
analysis.
9. Report Effectiveness:
o Track KPIs:
§ % issues closed on time
§ Repeat issue rate
§ CSA accuracy vs. audit testing.

Critical Principles

• Ownership ≠ Audit: Clients own fixes; audit owns verification.


• IIA Standards Alignment: Standard 2500 (Monitoring) and 2600
(Communicating Results).
• Psychological Safety: Reward transparency in self-assessments.

Pro Tips to Prevent Failures

✅ Automate Tracking: Use workflows in GRC tools to auto-flag overdue items.


✅ Root Cause Focus: Tag issues by cause (e.g., "Training gap," "System limitation").
✅ Heat Map Reporting: Visualize overdue issues by department/risk level for
committees.
Templates & Tools

1. Issue Tracking Template:

Due Evidence
ID Issue Description Owner Status
Date Tested

Access reviews not


A1 IT Dir 15/10/25 Open N/A
performed
2. CSA Design Checklist:
o☑ Max 15 questions
o ☑ Clear evidence requirements
o ☑ Anonymous submission option (if culture allows)
3. Escalation Workflow:

Team Action Plan

1. Audit all overdue issues > 60 days this month.


2. Pilot a CSA for top 3 risk areas (e.g., access controls, vendor onboarding).
3. Report "repeat issues" to the Audit Committee next quarter.

You might also like