Goenka Model United Nations

Committee : United Nations Women

Portfolio : The Federal Republic of Germany

Agenda : Abortion Rights in the U.S.A – Balancing Law & Choice

General Speaker’s List : Speech ( 70 sec ) ( 20 sec ) Yield to Floor

Honourable Chair, Distinguished Delegates,

The Federal Republic of Germany reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the

principles of dignity, liberty, and justice. As enshrined in Article 1 of the German
Basic Law, “Human dignity shall be inviolable. It is the duty of all state authority
to respect and protect it.” This is not merely a constitutional statement—it is our
legal obligation and moral compass.

Germany’s position is clear: access to safe and legal abortion is a fundamental

aspect of human dignity and reproductive justice. Under §218a of our Criminal
Code, abortion is permitted within twelve weeks following mandatory, non-directive
counseling, preserving the right of the woman to choose—not in isolation, but with
dignity and informed care.

In 2022, Germany repealed §219a, ensuring women can access unbiased, scientific
information about abortion from qualified professionals. This policy shift was
commended by CEDAW, aligning us more closely with UNFPA and WHO standards.

Germany proposes:

 A UN-certified digital abortion information portal;

 Cross-border medical cooperation for safe access;
 Reproductive Rights Observatories under UN Women;
 Integration of CEDAW General Recommendation 35 to recognize forced
motherhood as gender-based violence.
As Gloria Steinem famously stated, “The ability to decide whether or when to have
children is the basis of every other form of freedom.” It is our duty to safeguard
that freedom through action—not rhetoric.

We also call for full incorporation of CEDAW General Recommendation No. 35 on

gender-based violence, recognizing forced motherhood as a violation of human
rights.

Bodily autonomy is not subject to political convenience—it is protected by law,

guided by justice, and owed to every woman.

Thank you.

Moderated Caucus Speeches :

1. Ensuring Access to Abortion in Conflict and Humanitarian Settings

Honourable Chair, Esteemed Delegates,

The Federal Republic of Germany stands unwavering in affirming that humanitarian

crises must not be used as pretexts to violate human rights. In war zones, denying
abortion to women—especially survivors of sexual violence—amounts to institutional
cruelty.

We reaffirm our support for the UNFPA's Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP)
and call for its full, enforceable integration into all emergency response mechanisms.
Germany actively funds reproductive health access for refugees in the Sahel and
Middle East through its cooperation with UNFPA and WHO.

To quote UNFPA: "Access to sexual and reproductive health care in emergencies

saves lives and protects dignity."

Let us remember the words of Dr. Natalia Kanem, Executive Director of UNFPA:
"No woman should be forced to carry the child of her rapist simply because she
crossed a border."

This is not just about care—it is about restoring humanity to the world’s most
vulnerable.
Thank you.

2. Cultural and Religious Barriers to Abortion Access

Honourable Chair, Distinguished Delegates,

Culture and religion are pillars of identity, but never justifications for the subjugation
of women. The Federal Republic of Germany condemns the misuse of tradition to
institutionalize reproductive coercion.

We advocate for the launch of a UN Women Interfaith Alliance for Reproductive

Freedom, promoting dialogue, education, and values-based reform rooted in dignity
and human rights.

As Malala Yousafzai rightly said: "We cannot all succeed when half of us are held
back." Reproductive justice is not a Western ideal—it is a global necessity.

Furthermore, CEDAW General Recommendation No. 24 calls on States to eliminate

discrimination “in the provision of healthcare based on stereotyped gender roles
and cultural patterns.”

Let us build bridges—not barriers—between tradition and choice.

Thank you.

3. Role of UN Women in Advancing Global Abortion Access

Honourable Chair, Fellow Delegates,

The Federal Republic of Germany views UN Women as the rightful global steward
of reproductive freedom, and urges a transition from advocacy to infrastructure and
enforcement.

We propose the creation of a UN Women Global Reproductive Justice Fund,

alongside regional Access Compliance Panels, to ensure implementation of treaties
such as ICCPR, CEDAW, and the Maputo Protocol.
As stated by Michelle Bachelet, former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights:
"Women’s rights are not negotiable. Reproductive rights are human rights."

Let UN Women not merely observe progress, but command it with global legitimacy,
enforcement, and partnership.

Germany is committed to co-sponsoring and funding these initiatives through its

ongoing contributions to UNFPA, UN Women, and IPPF.

Thank you.

4. Ensuring Informed Consent in Abortion Procedures

Consent is not a procedural checkbox—it is the cornerstone of bodily autonomy.

The Federal Republic of Germany ensures informed consent through non-directive

state counselling, enabling women to decide freely—without coercion, misinformation,
or moral policing.

We urge UN Women to establish a Global Protocol on Informed Consent, mandating

that every woman receives:

 Scientifically accurate information,

 Available in multiple languages,

 Adapted for minors and persons with disabilities.

As bell hooks, feminist theorist, rightly said: "When we choose to love, we begin
to move against domination… we begin to move toward freedom." Consent is that
choice.

As per General Comment No. 22 of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and

Cultural Rights, “All health care, including reproductive services, must be delivered
in a manner that ensures free and informed consent.”

Germany calls for standardisation of this right—globally.

Thank you.
5. Sex Education - Teenagers

Germany strongly believes that education is prevention. Our national curriculum

ensures age-appropriate, scientifically accurate sexual education to empower youth
and reduce abortion rates.

We propose a UN Women Global Toolkit on Comprehensive Sexuality Education,

tailored for diverse cultural contexts and school systems.

UNESCO confirms: “Comprehensive sexuality education leads to delayed sexual

debut and fewer unintended pregnancies.”

Knowledge is protection. Education is empowerment. Let’s equip the next generation

with both.

Thank you.

Important Questions which delegates can ask

1. Technical Illegality Under Penal Code § 218

Concern: Germany's criminal code (§218 StGB) continues to label abortion as

illegal, albeit non-punishable within limitations. This legal fiction perpetuates
stigma and chilling effect on providers and women seeking care.
Official Response: The Federal Constitutional Court (1993) upheld this legal
dichotomy, framing it as a compromise between fetal protection and women’s
rights. Yet UN treaty bodies—such as the ICCPR Committee during Germany’s
7th periodic review—have flagged this framework as inconsistent with
international human rights obligations, urging Germany to reform it.
Source:

 UN ICCPR Committee, Concluding Observations (2021): technical illegality

criticized.

 BVerfG ruling: enforced the legal compromise.

2. Mandatory Counselling and 3-Day Waiting Period

 Concern: Women are required to undergo state-mandated counselling focused
on promoting continuation of pregnancy and observe a mandatory 72-hour
waiting period—even when legally entitled to abortion. UN and WHO
characterize these requirements as medically unnecessary and rights-inhibiting.
Official Response: Germany has resisted repealing this requirement, citing
constitutional protections and the need for informed decisions. However, the
2024 government-appointed expert commission recommended eliminating these
requirements for abortions in the first trimester, and a cross-party draft law
was introduced in November 2024.
Sources:

 CEDAW Concluding Observations, 2017 & 2023: calls for removal.

 Expert Commission, Reuters Apr 2024.

3. Geographic Disparities and Provider Shortages

Concern: Rural and conservative regions like Bavaria and Saxony suffer from
no or minimal abortion access due to provider refusals or absences.
Official Response: Germany's federal system places responsibility on the
Länder, but there is no legally binding requirement to ensure regional service
coverage. The expert commission of 2024 explicitly named these disparities
as rights-violating and urged national-level corrective measures.
Sources:

 Reuters, “Experts recommend legalising abortion…” (Apr 15, 2024).

 CEDAW, 2023: geographic access concern.

4. Conscientious Objection by Medical Professionals

Concern: Health-care staff can refuse to provide abortion services based on

moral grounds. In areas with few providers, this can eliminate access entirely.
Official Response: German law recognizes conscientious objection without
 robust referral obligations. While international bodies like WHO and CEDAW
acknowledge the right to objection, they emphasize the state’s duty to ensure
alternative provider options. Germany has not yet implemented mandatory
referral policies.
Sources:

 CEDAW 2023 Concluding Observations.

 WHO, Safe Abortion Guideline 2022 (reference).

5. Advertising Ban on Provider Services (§219a StGB) – Prior to 2022

Concern: Until §219a was repealed in July 2022, doctors could not publicly
state they performed abortions, limiting information.
Official Response: The Bundestag removed §219a in 2022 following UN and
domestic pressure. Though providers can now declare services offered,
Germany lacks a central registry, and information gaps persist, particularly for
marginalized groups.
Sources:

 Reuters Apr 2024 (commission recommendation).

 German Bundestag repeal documentation July 2022.

6. Telemedicine Restrictions on Medical Abortion

Loophole: Although WHO standards support medical abortion up to 12 weeks via

telemedicine, Germany restricts services to 7 weeks gestation, forcing many to seek
in-person care or travel abroad.
Response: WHO and the Center for Reproductive Rights have highlighted that
Germany’s gestational limit is out of step with global best-practice and international
human rights standards. A government-appointed expert commission in April 2024
explicitly criticized such discrepancies and recommended aligning policy with WHO
 guidance. Germany now faces international scrutiny on telemedicine barriers that
disproportionately impact rural and vulnerable populations.
Sources:

 Reuters: “Experts recommend legalising abortion…” (Apr 9, 2024) X (formerly

Twitter)+5Yahoo News+5ThePrint+5Reuters

 Center for Reproductive Rights press release (Apr 15, 2024) Center for
Reproductive Rights+1The Guardian+1

7. Absence of Buffer Zones at Clinics

Loophole: Women still face harassment at abortion clinics. Germany lacked any
nationwide buffer-zone law, leaving clinics vulnerable.
Response: As of 13 November 2024, an amendment to the
Schwangerschaftskonfliktgesetz introduced a 100 m buffer zone around clinics,
making harassment an administrative offense punishable by up to €5,000. The
Library of Congress confirms implementation and enforcement responsibility lies with
the Länder.
Source:

 LOC Global Legal Monitor (Nov 18, 2024) The Library of Congress

8. Decline in Abortion Providers

Loophole: The number of abortion providers declined by nearly 50% over two
decades, with many rural areas left underserved.
Response: In April 2024, the expert commission cautioned that shrinking provider
numbers jeopardize access and recommended decriminalisation to attract more
professionals. However, Germany’s legislative bodies have yet to address funding or
medical training to reverse this trend.
Source:

 Reuters (Apr 15, 2024) AP News+2Reuters+2The Guardian+2

9. ⚖ Politicisation of Judicial Appointments on Abortion

 Loophole: Appointment of pro-abortion judges faces political resistance, as seen
with Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, whose nomination was postponed amid ideological
scrutiny.
Impact: Reuters (July 2025) reports her candidacy was “shelved … after right-wing
criticism of her pro-abortion stance,” illustrating how judicial independence on
abortion-related cases is under political pressure.
Source:

 Reuters (July 16, 2025) Reuters+1Reuters+1

10. ⚠ Commission Recommendations Waiting on Legislation

Loophole: Despite unanimous expert endorsement to decriminalise first-trimester

abortion, Germany has yet to submit a legislative bill for parliamentary debate.
Response: Reuters coverage indicates that while the expert commission delivered
recommendations in April 2024, implementation is stalled pending government
action. Constitutional court challenges have been threatened by opposition
members.
Source:

 Reuters (Apr 15, 2024)

11. International Standards vs. Domestic Lag

Loophole: Germany’s abortion framework remains stricter than many EU peers

regarding access, gestational limits, and legal clarity.
Response: Reuters notes that Germany still treats abortion as criminal unless
specific conditions apply, unlike more liberal systems in France, Spain, and the UK.
The 2024 commission concluded this inconsistency demands legal modernisation.
Source:

 Reuters comparative article (Apr 15, 2024)

12. No Centralized Provider Registry

 Loophole: Germany lacks an official, searchable directory of abortion providers, a
gap that disproportionately affects non-German speakers and vulnerable women.
Response: While §219a was repealed in 2022, no federal mechanism exists to
establish or regulate such a registry. UNHRC and CEDAW have repeatedly urged
improved transparency, yet no federal action has followed.
Source:

 CEDAW Observations (2017/2023) Center for Reproductive Rights (implied context)

13. Economic Barriers Persist

Loophole: Abortions under counselling require women to pay €350–600, unless they
qualify as low-income, amounting to financial stress and deferred access.
Response: UN and WHO have highlighted the inconsistency of access under
universal health models. Germany’s 2024 commission noted this as a human rights
issue, but reimbursement remains restricted and contested politically.
Source:

 Center for Reproductive Rights (Apr 15, 2024) Center for Reproductive Rights

 Reuters coverage (Apr 9, 2024)

14. Harassment Laws Implementation Varies

Loophole: Though buffer zones are now law, enforcement across states is
inconsistent. Women continue to report intimidation and emotional distress.
Response: Reuters has documented ongoing political debate over enforcement
standards, with some states resisting full implementation due to free speech
concerns.
Source:

 LOC Global Legal Monitor The Library of Congress

 Reuters U.S. buffer zone analog (contextual comparison)

15. Legislative Inaction Despite Expert Advice

 Loophole: Fourteen months after the expert commission’s report, no draft legislation
has been formally introduced—even though it remains government policy to consider
reform by 2025.
Response: Reuters (2024) and German parliamentary records confirm no formal bill
has been scheduled. Opposition parties have threatened constitutional challenges,
and no timeline is set. This legislative inertia undermines Germany’s credibility
under international human rights obligations.
Source:

 Reuters (Apr 9 & 15, 2024

reproductiverights.org

Germany has a historic opportunity to modernise its abortion law

November 14, 2024 — The proposed legislation would fully legalise abortion on request
up to 12 weeks of pregnancy and remove the mandatory three-day waiting period.

reproductiverights.org

Germany Faces Growing Pressure to Reform its Outdated Abortion ...

October 24, 2024 — The bill proposes to legalise abortion on request up to 22 weeks and
fully decriminalise those obtaining abortion care.

reuters.com

Abortions in first 12 weeks should be fully legalised in Germany ...

April 15, 2024 — Women in Germany now typically require counselling to obtain a legal
abortion within the first 12 weeks, with exceptions including for victims ...


theguardian.com

Abortions in first 12 weeks should be legalised in Germany ...

April 15, 2024 — Abortions in Germany should be legalised within the first 12 weeks of
pregnancy, a government-appointed commission has recommended. While ...

pbs.org

Experts group says abortion in Germany should be decriminalized ...

April 15, 2024 — Currently, abortion is considered illegal in Germany but not punishable
if a woman undergoes mandatory counseling and a three-day wait period ...

facebook.com

12-week abortions should be legalized: German commission

April 15, 2024 — A government-appointed commission recommended that abortion be

legalized in Germany during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.

reuters.com

Experts recommend legalising abortion in Germany, media reports say

April 9, 2024 — Germany should legalise abortions within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy,
a government-appointed commission has recommended, several media outlets reported
on ...


 un.org

[PDF] CEDAW/C/DEU/CO/9 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of ...

May 31, 2023 — It notes that a commission on reproductive self-determination and

reproductive medicine has been appointed to examine whether abortions in ...


hrw.org

Letter to the UN Special Procedures on Abortion Rights in the US

March 2, 2023 — The proliferation of abortion bans in the US has decimated reproductive
autonomy — the power to control all aspects of one's reproductive health ...

reproductiverights.org

[PDF] U.S. Abortion Laws in Global Context - Center for Reproductive Rights

September 20, 2022 — improve access to abortion by removing mandatory waiting

periods and reducing third-party authorization requirements, among other things. In ...


qlrc.qld.gov.au

Review of termination of pregnancy laws Consultation Paper

December 13, 2017 — Gestational limits on the performance of terminations of

pregnancy also sometimes operate as a matter of clinical practice. health practitioner.


duke.edu

[PDF] gender-blind: international human rights on abortion

November 18, 2012 — ... CEDAW Concluding Observations: El Salvador (2017) ¶ 36(a). 398
See ... protection of the law, in Article 26 of the ICCPR.1045. Notably ...


un.org
 [PDF] A Global Study on the Implementation of United Nations Security ...

The Global Study on the implementation of resolution. 1325 is an important part of the
United Nations global agenda for change to better serve the world's most ...


uva.nl

[PDF] UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) - Research Explorer

79 Polish Parliament Rejects Bill Seeking to Ease Strict Abortion Law, REUTERS (July 12,
2024). ... government ... 44 CEDAW, Concluding Observations on the Combined ...

jstor.org

How Activist Groups Use Human Rights Rhetoric In The Fight ... - jstor

In Germany, abortion is, in simple terms, legal and available until the 12-week mark at
which point abortion becomes criminalized for both physicians and ...


europa.eu

[PDF] Gendered aspects of sexual and reproductive health

Abstract. This study, commissioned by the European Parliament's Policy. Department for
Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the.


europa.eu

[PDF] Backlash in Gender Equality and Women's and Girls' Rights in the EU

the 16th week without consultation or a prescribed waiting period, and no justification is
needed from ... concern in recent years, as the UN CEDAW Committee
POSITION PAPER

1. Criminal Code §§ 218 and 218a StGB – Framework for Non-Punishable

Abortions

Germany maintains § 218 of the Strafgesetzbuch, which criminalizes abortion;

however, under § 218a StGB, Termination is non-punishable if performed within 12
weeks post conception, following mandatory neutral pregnancy-conflict counselling
at a state-approved centre and observing a minimum waiting period of three days,
with issuance of a “Beratungsschein” certificate required. This legal structure
reflects Germany’s constitutional balancing between fetal life protection and the
woman's rights, as upheld by the Federal Constitutional Court decisions of the
early 1990s (1975 and 1993 rulings).
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK611897/,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Germany,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Constitutional_Court_abortion_decision%2C_1975)

2. Schwangerschaftskonfliktgesetz (SchKG) – Counselling & Access Framework

The Act on Help in Conflict Situations in Pregnancy (SchKG)—enacted in 1995—

lays down legally binding frameworks for the neutral counselling requirement, the
structure of state-approved counselling centres (including mandated staffing
standards like one full-time counsellor per 40,000 inhabitants), waiting periods,
issuance of the Beratungsschein, and provisions allowing for means-tested
reimbursement for low-income individuals. It also formally authorizes conscientious
objection for providers, while obligating states to ensure geographical counselling
coverage. (https://abortion-policies.srhr.org/country/germany/)

3. Repeal of § 219a StGB – Decriminalisation of Information

In June–July 2022, Germany’s Bundestag repealed § 219a of the Criminal Code,

which had prohibited medical practitioners from advertising or even stating they
offer abortion services. The repeal was adopted on 24 June 2022, confirmed by
Bundesrat on 8 July 2022, and effective 18 July 2022. All prior convictions were
annulled, thus fully decriminalising factual medical information provision. Germany
informed the UN Human Rights Committee (ICCPR) and the CEDAW Committee,
which welcomed this reform. https://c-fam.org/human_rights/germany-abortion-tbs-
ccpr/, https://c-fam.org/human_rights/germany-abortion-tbs-cedaw/)
4. UN Treaty Bodies’ Recommendations & Germany’s Responses (ICCPR,
CEDAW, UNHRC)

Germany has been subject to concluding observations by ICCPR, UNHRC, and

CEDAW. ICCPR acknowledged the repeal of § 219a as progress but raised
concerns over mandatory waiting periods and continued criminalization under
§ 218a. CEDAW (2023) commended information reforms and the appointment of a
reproductive self-determination commission, but expressed concern over regional
provider disparities, mandatory counselling, waiting periods, and lack of full
insurance coverage. Germany responded by referencing constitutional jurisprudence
and societal consensus, though committing to progressive evaluation. (https://c-
fam.org/human_rights/germany-abortion-tbs-ccpr/, https://c-
fam.org/human_rights/germany-abortion-tbs-cedaw/)

5. Government Action against Harassment & Protection of Clinic Access

Official German authorities have faced pressure, including from UN human rights
mechanisms, to address long-term street harassment by anti-abortion activists
outside state-approved counselling centres. Courts have ruled in 2011–12 that such
harassment constitutes inhuman or degrading treatment, particularly when women
cannot avoid it due to mandatory counselling requirements. In response, the
German government initiated legislative measures to protect facility access and
restrict protests near clinics, echoing treaty bodies’ requests for remedial action.
(https://www.djb.de/presse/stellungnahmen/detail/st18-04,
https://www.djb.de/presse/stellungnahmen/detail/st20-06e)

II. Financial Coverage, State-Funding & Statistical Data

6. State Funding Regime & Cost Reimbursement Policies

According to InformedHealth.org (NCBI), where abortion is performed under the

counselling model, costs range from €350 to €650 depending on region and
method (medication vs surgery). If the applicant’s net income is below €1,446 per
month (higher thresholds apply for those with children or high rent), the federal
state (Sozialamt) reimburses all medical and counselling fees. Public health
insurers cover full costs for abortions performed due to medical necessity or rape;
private insured or uninsured persons seek reimbursement prior to the procedure.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK611898/)

7. Annual Abortion Statistics & Trends (Destatis Official Data)

Germany’s Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) reports approximately 99,948

abortions in 2020, 94,596 in 2021 (−5.4%), and approximately 104,000 in 2022,
marking a 9.9% increase from 2021 and the highest level since 2012. In 2022,
96.2% of abortions were conducted under the counselling arrangement, and the
abortion rate was approximately 59 per 10,000 women of reproductive age.
(https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-Environment/Health/Abortions/_node.html)

III. UN Compliance & Germany’s International Alignment

9. Alignment with WHO Safe Abortion Standards

Germany’s regulations permit medical abortion (mifepristone/misoprostol) up to 63

days (approx. nine weeks gestation), and vacuum aspiration up to 12 weeks, in
line with WHO clinical guidelines. These methods are approved and supported in
national clinical guidelines and permitted under medical indication rules when fetal
or maternal health is at risk. Germany also supports telemedicine self-managed
abortion services, consistent with WHO recognition of these models.
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK611898/, https://www.who.int/news-
room/feature-stories/detail/self-management-of-medical-abortion-via-telemedicine-in-
germany)

10. German Government Engagement with UN Human Rights Obligations

Germany engages constructively with UN treaty bodies such as ICCPR, CEDAW,

and UNHRC, providing responses to critical concluding observations. It cites
constitutional court rulings (1975, 1993) and internal political consensus in justifying
retention of § 218a. Germany has established a commission on reproductive
self-determination to study potential decriminalisation reforms. Despite criticism
regarding mandatory counselling and financing, Germany maintains dialogue and
policy evaluation. (https://c-fam.org/human_rights/germany-abortion-tbs-cedaw/)

Concluding Remarks (Germany’s Position)

Germany reaffirms its commitment to ensuring that abortion-related laws respect
both fetal life and women’s rights in accordance with constitutional mandates and
international human rights law. Germany upholds its legal framework (§ 218/218a,
SchKG), has fully decriminalised information dissemination (§ 219a repeal), provides
means-tested state funding, and continues engagement with UN human rights
mechanisms (ICCPR, CEDAW, UNHRC). Germany remains open to legislative
evolution through its reproductive self-determination commission and stands ready to
enhance access, reduce regional disparities, and comply fully with WHO and UN
standards.

1. Importance of Granting Reproductive Rights to Women

1. Fundamental Human Right: Reproductive freedom is

enshrined under international treaties including the ICCPR
Articles 3, 17, 26 and CEDAW Article 12, obligating
signatory states like Germany to uphold autonomy, privacy,
and non-discrimination in health decisions.

2. Health and Mortality Link: WHO data affirms that restricting

reproductive access correlates with increased maternal
mortality, unsafe abortions, and mental health burdens.

3. Enabler of Gender Equality: UN Women outlines that bodily

autonomy directly supports SDG 5 targets such as
eliminating gender-based discrimination, ensuring access to
reproductive healthcare, and achieving equality in decision-
making.

4. Economic and Social Participation: UNFPA emphasizes that

access to contraception and reproductive services enhances
 women’s educational attainment and labour force
participation, positively impacting national GDP.

Sources:

 https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-
mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-
political-rights

 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preventing-
unsafe-abortion

 https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/health-and-
reproductive-rights/facts-and-figures

 https://www.unfpa.org/resources/my-body-my-life-my-world-
state-world-population-2021

2. Key German Laws and Policies on Abortion and

Reproductive Health

1. Repeal of §219a (2022): Germany abolished the ban on

advertising abortion services, empowering doctors to offer
factual information—a landmark shift aligned with CEDAW
recommendations.

2. Buffer Zone Legislation (2024): Legally enforces 100-meter

no-harassment zones around clinics and counselling centres
to protect women from intimidation, now an administrative
offence.
3. Partial Criminalisation (§218a): Abortion remains technically
criminal after 12 weeks, except under mandatory
counselling—a legal compromise long criticized by UNHRC
and CEDAW.

4. Telemedicine Initiatives: Germany has begun limited

telemedicine abortion pilot projects for early-stage
pregnancies (<7 weeks), especially during COVID-19,
partially in line with WHO guidance.

Sources:

 https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2022-06-
27/germany-repeals-provision-prohibiting-advertising-of-
abortion-services/

 https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2024-11-
18/germany-harassment-abortion-counseling-illegal/

 https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared%20Docum
ents/DEU/INT_CEDAW_COC_DEU_53729_E.pdf

 https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/self-
managed-abortion-via-telemedicine-in-germany

3. Awareness, Education, and Counselling Measures

1. Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA): Runs

nationwide sexuality and reproduction campaigns across
schools, migrant communities, and youth centres in multiple
languages.
2. BMFSFJ’s “Mother and Child” Foundation: Allocates over
€92 million annually to pregnant women in hardship,
supporting housing, healthcare, and prenatal costs.

3. Mandatory Counselling System (§219): Offers state-certified,

free, confidential counselling services to all women seeking
abortions—prioritizing informed consent.

4. Digital Access Expansion: Germany invests in online portals,

counselling helplines, and multilingual educational materials
ensuring inclusive outreach for vulnerable women.

Sources:

 https://www.bzga.de/home/

 https://www.bmfsfj.de/resource/blob/94020/4e026962bf90f9906a
7be64a692b4f3f/infoblatt-mutter-und-kind-englisch-data.pdf

 https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__219.html

 https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/meta/en/pregnancy-and-the-desire-
to-have-children-224060

4. Progress Toward SDG 5 – Gender Equality in Germany

1. Voluntary National Review (VNR) 2021: Germany’s official

SDG report confirms focus on gender equity in healthcare
access, reproductive education, and legal rights.

2. Beijing+30 Review (2024): UN Women commended

Germany's efforts but identified implementation gaps in
 migrant and rural outreach, and inadequate legal reform in
§218.

3. National Gender Strategy (2020): Establishes cross-

ministerial plans to align health policy with SDG 5.6 on
universal reproductive rights and services.

4. Federal Statistical Portal: Real-time gender equality

indicators (education, health, violence, employment) are
tracked to ensure compliance with SDG 5 benchmarks.

Sources:

 https://sdg-indikatoren.de/en/5/

 https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2024-
09/b30_report_germany_en.pdf

 https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/themen/gleichstellung/gleichstellun
gsstrategie/gleichstellungsstrategie-englisch-198408

 https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-
Environment/Social-Statistics/Gender/Gender-Equality-
Index/_node.html

5. Public Funding and Financial Commitments to Reproductive

Health

1. Counselling and Education (BZgA): Entirely state-funded,

BZgA’s budget includes youth sexuality education,
contraceptive awareness, and clinic referrals.
2. Mother and Child Foundation Grants: Germany disburses
€92+ million annually in non-repayable grants for pregnant
women, administered by local governments.

3. Insurance-based Coverage: While abortion itself is not

publicly funded under §218a, medical abortions with clinical
indication (e.g., danger to health) are covered by public
health insurance.

4. Federal Budget Allocations: Germany’s 2021 Ministry for

Families and Women allocated €13.1 billion overall, with a
major share for reproductive, maternal, and child health
programmes.

Sources:

 https://www.bzga.de/infomaterialien/sexualaufklaerung/

 https://www.bmfsfj.de/resource/blob/94020/4e026962bf90f9906a
7be64a692b4f3f/infoblatt-mutter-und-kind-englisch-data.pdf

 https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__218a.html

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Ministry_for_Family_Affairs
,_Senior_Citizens,_Women_and_Youth

6. Statistical Monitoring and Medical Oversight

1. Robert Koch Institute (RKI) Reports: 94,596 abortions in

2021; 95.8% counselling-based; 4.1% medically indicated;
only 0.05% for criminal causes (rape).
2. Abortion Timing: 42.2% before 7 weeks; 33.6% during
weeks 7–8; 21% at 9–11 weeks; <3% after 12 weeks with
valid indication.

3. Long-Term Trends: Abortions dropped from ~135,000 in

1996 to under 95,000 in 2021; rate fell from 8.0 to 6.65 per
1,000 women aged 15–44.

4. NCBI Findings (Peer-Reviewed): Confirms decline in late-

term abortions, increase in use of mifepristone and early
pharmacological interventions.

Sources:

 https://www.rki.de/EN/Content/Health_Monitoring/Health_Report
ing/GBEDownloadsJ/FactSheets_en/JHealthMonit_2022_02_Ab
ortion_Germany.pdf

 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9275520/

 https://www.destatis.de/EN/Themes/Society-
Environment/Health/Abortions/_node.html

 https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/sexual-
and-reproductive-health/data-and-statistics
United States of America

1. In light of the Dobbs decision, how does the U.S. plan to guarantee
equitable access to reproductive healthcare in states with full bans?

2. What safeguards exist to protect women’s rights in jurisdictions where

abortion has been criminalized?

3. How does the U.S. ensure that its global commitments to gender equality
remain intact despite the erosion of domestic protections?

4. What policy response is planned to mitigate the public health impact of

restricted access, especially for marginalized communities?

5. How does the U.S. intend to support cross-state and international

reproductive justice initiatives in light of growing demand?

🇨🇦 Canada

1. What mechanisms ensure equitable abortion access in remote provinces and

among Indigenous populations?

2. How does Canada reconcile provider conscientious objection with patients’

right to time-sensitive reproductive care?

3. What policies are in place to strengthen Canada’s role as a reproductive

rights sanctuary for international partners?

4. In what ways does Canada fund and support cross-border collaborations on

reproductive health with developing nations?

5. How is Canada scaling awareness campaigns to promote bodily autonomy

among youth and marginalized communities?

🇮🇪 Ireland

1. What steps is Ireland taking to strengthen abortion service delivery post-

repeal of the 8th Amendment?
 2. How does the state ensure access is not hindered by geographic,
institutional, or ideological constraints?

3. Does Ireland plan to expand the legal time window for termination beyond
12 weeks?

4. What role does Ireland envision for itself in promoting reproductive rights
within the EU and globally?

5. How are public health systems ensuring that abortion care is provided
without delay or discrimination?

🇵🇱 Poland

1. With recent judicial reforms restricting access, how does Poland safeguard
women’s right to life and health under EU law?

2. What measures are being considered to reduce preventable maternal deaths

linked to abortion denial?

3. How does Poland respond to mass public demonstrations and international

concern over its reproductive policies?

4. Does Poland have plans to reconsider its legal framework in light of growing
domestic and international pressure?

5. What support, if any, is extended to women forced to travel abroad for

reproductive services?

🇲🇽 Mexico

1. How is Mexico ensuring federal decriminalization rulings are enforced in

conservative and rural states?

2. How is protection extended to medical professionals offering abortion services

in high-risk regions?

3. What role does Mexico play in supporting reproductive rights across Latin
America?
 4. How does Mexico facilitate abortion access for Indigenous women and other
marginalized groups?

5. What frameworks exist to standardize post-abortion care and psychological

services across all regions?

🇧🇷 Brazil

1. What steps is Brazil taking to improve reproductive health access amid a

conservative legal climate?

2. How does the Brazilian government address the healthcare disparities faced
by Afro-Brazilian and Indigenous women?

3. Are there legal reforms being considered to expand access beyond life-
threatening or rape-based exceptions?

4. How does Brazil align its reproductive policies with the Inter-American
Commission on Human Rights' standards?

5. How is civil society involved in promoting safe abortion awareness and

education?

🇦🇷 Argentina

1. How is Argentina ensuring abortion access is not undermined by provider

refusal in certain provinces?

2. What mechanisms exist to prevent institutional obstruction of legal abortion

services?

3. How does Argentina support post-abortion healthcare and reintegration

programs?

4. Is the government taking steps to reduce disparities in access between

urban and rural populations?

5. How does Argentina’s legal framework influence broader Latin American

policy reform?
🇮🇳 India

1. Despite legal amendments, how is India improving the quality and reach of
reproductive health services in rural districts?

2. How does India monitor implementation of the MTP Act to prevent systemic
denial or delay?

3. What efforts are being taken to integrate sex education across all
educational boards?

4. How does India ensure equitable care for LGBTQ+, disabled, and unmarried
individuals under reproductive health law?

5. What is India’s strategy to counter deep-rooted stigma against abortion in

conservative regions?

🇨🇳 China

1. With shifting demographics, how is China balancing its population strategy

with reproductive autonomy?

2. What safeguards exist to ensure abortion access for unmarried or

undocumented women?

3. How is the government addressing the ethical issues surrounding historical

forced abortion practices?

4. Does China have any plan to counter discriminatory sex-selective abortions?

5. How is China collaborating internationally on reproductive rights and maternal

health?

🇦🇫 Afghanistan

1. What legal rights, if any, do Afghan women have under Taliban rule to
access basic reproductive healthcare?
 2. How is Afghanistan addressing the humanitarian crisis of unsafe abortions
and related maternal deaths?

3. What international monitoring mechanisms does the Afghan government

cooperate with on women's health?

4. How does the regime address reproductive rights in the context of survivors
of gender-based violence?

5. Does the government allow NGOs or international partners to operate safe

reproductive health clinics?

🇯🇵 Japan

1. Why does Japan continue to require spousal consent for abortion, and are
reforms being considered?

2. What national policies exist to protect reproductive autonomy for single

women and minors?

3. How is Japan expanding access to abortion pills and non-invasive

procedures?

4. What is being done to address systemic stigma and mental health post-
abortion?

5. How does Japan promote reproductive education in schools and through

media platforms?

🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia

1. In line with Vision 2030, how does Saudi Arabia intend to modernize its
approach to reproductive healthcare?

2. What legal provisions exist for victims of rape or incest to access abortion?

3. Are there national initiatives to introduce reproductive health awareness in

schools or religious institutions?
 4. How does Saudi Arabia address rising international concern over its gender-
based healthcare policies?

5. Is the Kingdom considering adopting guidelines from the WHO or UNFPA on

safe abortion protocols?

🇳🇬 Nigeria

1. With high maternal mortality due to unsafe abortions, what reforms are being
prioritized?

2. How does Nigeria comply with the Maputo Protocol’s reproductive health
mandates?

3. Are public hospitals mandated to provide reproductive services to conflict-

affected populations?

4. How is reproductive education being expanded in school curricula across all

states?

5. What steps are being taken to train healthcare providers in offering legal,
non-discriminatory abortion services?

🇮🇷 Iran

1. What avenues for legal abortion exist for survivors of sexual violence under
Iran’s current laws?

2. How does Iran monitor maternal health outcomes in relation to abortion

restrictions?

3. Are there any initiatives to revise laws in accordance with Islamic

jurisprudence supporting life and dignity?

4. How does Iran collaborate with WHO or international humanitarian agencies

on reproductive health?

5. What medical training is provided to ensure safe obstetric practices despite

legal limitations?
🇪🇬 Egypt

1. With abortion laws among the strictest in the region, what legal exceptions
are practically permitted?

2. How does Egypt intend to meet SDG 3.7 on universal access to

reproductive health services?

3. Are public health campaigns or education programs in place to inform

women of their rights?

4. What is the government's response to data on unsafe abortion-related

complications?

5. Are there inter-ministerial reforms being considered to harmonize public

health and criminal law?

🇫🇷 France

1. Following the constitutionalization of abortion rights, how will France protect

against potential future political reversals?

2. How is the government working to standardize reproductive services across

overseas territories?

3. What support systems are provided for migrants and asylum seekers seeking
abortion services?

4. How does France contribute to EU-wide reproductive rights resilience amidst

rising extremism?

5. What role do French medical associations play in promoting abortion

accessibility and ethics?

🇦🇺 Australia

1. How does Australia ensure equal access to abortion in conservative or

remote jurisdictions?
 2. What role does the federal government play in enforcing standardized
national abortion guidelines?

3. How does Australia address gender-based disparities in reproductive health

outcomes?

4. Are Indigenous communities meaningfully consulted in reproductive health

policy formulation?

5. How is Australia combating abortion stigma and misinformation in digital and

social spaces?

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

1. Why has abortion not yet been fully decriminalized in England and Wales
under modern legal standards?

2. How is access being improved in Northern Ireland post-devolution?

3. What are the UK’s plans to support abortion rights defenders in politically
conservative constituencies?

4. What accountability systems are in place for NHS regions failing to provide
timely abortion care?

5. How does the UK support global reproductive rights as part of its foreign
development strategy?

🇿🇦 South Africa

1. Despite a liberal abortion framework, what interventions are being taken to

address access gaps in rural provinces?

2. How does South Africa regulate conscientious objection to ensure it doesn’t

block legal access?

3. What legal or financial support is extended to survivors of unsafe abortions?

4. How is South Africa working to strengthen abortion rights in regional blocs

like the African Union?
 5. What public education programs are in place to counteract abortion-related
disinformation?

1. Topic: The Role of Telemedicine and Medication in Abortion

Access

Moderated Caucus Speech (Germany):

Honourable Chair, esteemed delegates,

The Federal Republic of Germany firmly affirms that telemedicine
is a fundamental enabler of safe abortion access, especially for
vulnerable populations. Since 2021, Germany has permitted
medical abortion via teleconsultation during the COVID-19
pandemic—an emergency adaptation later upheld by medical
bodies (Bundesärztekammer, 2021).
We urge all states to adopt the WHO’s 2022 guideline, which
affirms that self-managed medical abortion with remote support is
safe and effective up to 12 weeks (WHO, 2022).
Globally, however, 45% of abortions remain unsafe (WHO, 2022),
especially where telemedicine is banned. Germany calls for
international cooperation, digital infrastructure investment, and
cross-border medical collaborations to expand access while
maintaining regulatory safeguards.

Thank you.

Suggested POIs & Answers:

 POI: “How can Germany ensure safe telemedical abortion in

countries with poor digital access?”
Answer: “Germany proposes bilateral technical assistance
 programs to bolster digital health networks in low-income
settings, in line with SDG 3.c.”

 POI: “Is there data to prove telemedicine abortions are as

safe as in-clinic?”
Answer: “Yes. WHO and Guttmacher Institute confirm equal
efficacy and lower costs in over 25 peer-reviewed studies
(Guttmacher, 2021; WHO, 2022).”

Sources:

 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240039483

 https://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/

 https://www.guttmacher.org/

2. Topic: Decriminalization of Abortion: A Public Health Approach

Moderated Caucus Speech (Germany):

Distinguished delegates,
Germany views abortion not as a criminal act, but a healthcare
necessity. Although abortion in Germany is technically illegal
under §218 of the Penal Code, it is permitted within 12 weeks
under counseling (§218a), aligning legal boundaries with public
health imperatives.
Germany’s approach has led to one of the lowest abortion-related
mortality rates in Europe (0.01%) (Eurostat, 2023). In contrast, in
countries where abortion is criminalized, unsafe procedures cause
up to 7 million complications annually (WHO, 2022).
We advocate for decriminalization globally, not to encourage
abortion, but to protect women’s lives, uphold the ICCPR (Article
6), and ensure access to post-abortion care. We call on Member
States to reframe abortion as healthcare, not homicide.

Thank you.

Suggested POIs & Answers:

 POI: “How does Germany reconcile decriminalization with

religious sentiments?”
Answer: “By mandating pre-abortion counseling, Germany
balances moral considerations with health rights—modeling
respect for all beliefs.”

 POI: “What is Germany’s stance on international legal

reforms for abortion decriminalization?”
Answer: “Germany supports UN HRC Resolution 35/22 and
encourages ICCPR-based reform across national
jurisdictions.”

Sources:

 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion

 https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat

 https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/resolutions/hrc-resolution-
3522-elimination-discrimination-against-women-and-girls

3. Topic: Legal Ambiguities in Abortion Laws: Impact on

Healthcare Delivery
Moderated Caucus Speech (Germany):

Honourable Chair,
The Federal Republic of Germany stresses that ambiguous
abortion laws paralyze healthcare systems, instill fear among
providers, and endanger patients. A 2023 UNFPA report confirms
that legal uncertainty causes denial of emergency abortion
services in rape, incest, or threat-to-life cases across 32 states.
In Germany, despite legality under conditions, confusion persists
due to criminal code overlap—forcing recent reforms like the 2022
repeal of §219a which had prohibited doctors from advertising
abortion services (German Parliament, 2022).
We urge global clarification and harmonization of abortion laws in
compliance with CEDAW General Recommendation 24, ensuring
doctors are empowered—not prosecuted. Germany calls on WHO,
UN Women, and civil society to facilitate model legislation and
policy dialogue.

Thank you.

Suggested POIs & Answers:

 POI: “What role should international law play in a nation’s

abortion policy?”
Answer: “While sovereignty is respected, international norms
like ICCPR and CEDAW provide a legal framework to
prevent human rights violations.”

 POI: “How has Germany tackled its own ambiguities?”

Answer: “Through legal reform, public consultations, and
 updated medical education, ensuring both compliance and
clarity.”

Sources:

 https://www.bundestag.de/

 https://www.unfpa.org/resources/state-world-population-2023

 https://www.ohchr.org/en/treaty-bodies/cedaw/general-
recommendations

4. Addressing Social Stigma Faced by Women After Abortion

Speech (Germany):
Honourable Chair, distinguished delegates,
Germany recognizes that abortion-related stigma—rooted in
cultural norms, punitive laws, and discriminatory policies—inflicts
profound harm. Individuals are often labeled morally inferior,
leading to secrecy, psychological distress, and social isolation
PubMed+2NCBI+2Global Fund for Women+2. A systematic review
demonstrates that stigma increases anxiety, restricts access to
quality care, and silences women from reporting complications
arXiv+2PubMed+2PubMed+2.

Germany therefore advocates for multi-level interventions—public

education campaigns, stigma-sensitive training for healthcare
providers, legal reform to remove discriminatory penalties, and
inclusive hotlines or support networks—to ensure women feel
supported, not shamed, in seeking post-abortion care.

Thank you.
Suggested POIs & Answers:

 POI: “What proven strategies reduce stigma in societies with

strong taboos?”
Answer: “Collaborations with women’s rights organizations
and peer-led accompaniment networks, as demonstrated in
Latin America and Africa, normalize abortion and provide
safe spaces for care and solidarity .”

 POI: “How can states integrate anti-stigma training in

medical curricula?”
Answer: “Germany proposes technical cooperation with UN
agencies to develop provider training modules emphasizing
respectful, non-judgmental care and confidentiality.”

Sources:

 UNFPA adolescent stigma reports The Times of

India+8Global Fund for Women+8Reddit+8AP
News+15PubMed+15United Nations Population Fund+15

 Am J Public Health systematic review on stigma PubMed

5. Whether Spousal Consent Should Be Required for

Abortion

Speech (Germany):
Honourable Chair, esteemed colleagues,
Germany holds that requiring spousal consent for abortion
unjustifiably undermines women’s autonomy and violates
international human rights doctrine, including CEDAW and ICCPR
Article 23. Third-party consent requirements are linked to delays
in care and catastrophic outcomes; UNFPA recommends that
states presume individual capacity and eliminate unnecessary
consent barriers .

Germany asserts that consent should be exclusively the choice of

the pregnant individual—free from coercion, state interference, or
familial gatekeeping. This legal clarity ensures swift, dignified, and
equitable care delivery.

Thank you.

Suggested POIs & Answers:

 POI: “Is there a human rights rationale against third-party

consent mandates?”
Answer: “Yes. The UN Human Rights Committee and
CEDAW emphasize the presumption of individual legal
capacity—third-party consent disables consent rights
fundamentally Global Fund for Women+3United Nations
Population Fund+3PubMed+3.”

 POI: “How can governments phase out spousal consent

safely?”
Answer: “Through stepwise law reform, public awareness,
and provider training, in consultation with civil society and
rights-based actors.”

Sources:

 UNFPA human rights standards document United Nations

Population Fund
 6. Implementing Sexual Education for Teenagers to Prevent
Unwanted Pregnancies

Speech (Germany):
Honourable Chair, respected delegates,
Germany affirms that comprehensive sexuality education (CSE)
is critical in preventing unintended early pregnancies. UNFPA
reports that almost half of all pregnancies—121 million annually—
are unintended, and over 60% end in abortion, of which nearly
half are unsafe, contributing significantly to maternal mortality
UNFPA EECA. Adolescents face elevated risks: in sub-Saharan
Africa, girls aged 15–19 are twice as likely to die during
childbirth compared to women over 20, largely due to early
pregnancy-related complications and unsafe abortions UNFPA
ESARO.

UNFPA’s Cairo Programme and ICPD affirm that adolescent

programming combining age-appropriate sexual health information,
gender equality education, and youth-friendly services is proven
effective United Nations Population Fund+2United Nations
Population Fund+2Wikipedia+2. Germany supports comprehensive
sex education in schools globally and urges integration with
modern contraception access and confidential health services.

Thank you.

Suggested POIs & Answers:

  POI: “Is there evidence that CSE reduces teen pregnancy
and abortion rates?”
Answer: “Yes. Meta-analyses show that CSE programs
reduce unintended pregnancies and risky behaviors,
particularly when gender and rights are included in
curriculum design Wikipedia.”

 POI: “How can Germany support implementation in

conservative contexts?”
Answer: “Through capacity-building, curriculum translation
pilots, community engagement, and alignment with national
human rights obligations via UNFPA partnerships.”

Sources:

 UNFPA adolescent health and pregnancy data

Wikipedia+10UNFPA ESARO+10United Nations Population
Fund+10

 Meta-analysis and CSE impact review Wikipedia

7. Preventing Forced Abortions

Speech (Germany):
Honourable Chair, distinguished delegates,
Germany condemns forced abortions—a severe violation of bodily
and reproductive autonomy recognized internationally as a form of
reproductive coercion and even torture. Recent determinations by
the UN Human Rights Committee—such as the case of a 14-year-
old girl in Guatemala forced to carry a pregnancy resulting from
rape—underscore the grievous harm inflicted when legal abortion
is formally permitted but inaccessible in practice, leading officials
to deny critical services and perpetuate impunity AP
News+1Human Rights Watch+1.

States must ensure access to safe abortion in all permitted

cases—including rape, incest, or health risks—and must eliminate
coercion by guardians, medical staff, or authorities. Germany calls
for legally mandated monitoring systems, survivor support
measures, enforced informed consent protocols, and accountability
mechanisms in line with ICCPR and CIDCP rights.

Thank you.

Suggested POIs & Answers:

 POI: “What obligations do states have to monitor forced

abortion claims?”
Answer: “Under ICCPR, states must investigate credible
reports, ensure survivors access full health services, and
support rehabilitation—including education and psychosocial
care—per the Guatemala ruling AP News.”

 POI: “How should governments enforce protection?”

Answer: “By instituting mandatory training for officials,
creating reporting channels for coercion, removing legal
barriers to legal abortion, and providing reparative support.”

Sources:

 AP News/UN Human Rights Committee Guatemala case AP

News
🇩🇪 Summary from Germany’s Perspective – UN Women:
Abortion Rights Agenda

1. Global Legal Landscape and Inequality

Germany recognizes the glaring disparity in abortion access

worldwide. While over 60% of women live in countries where
abortion is legal (UN Women), 45% of all abortions remain
unsafe (WHO), predominantly in regions with restrictive laws like
Nigeria, Honduras, El Salvador, and Poland.
Germany is deeply concerned by these inequalities, particularly
where abortion is criminalized or denied even in cases of rape or
threats to life.

Germany’s stance: Access to abortion is a fundamental

healthcare right. Criminalization violates CEDAW and ICCPR,
and Germany supports decriminalization as a public health
imperative (WHO, UN Women).

2. The Post-Dobbs Reality in the United States

Germany notes the overturning of Roe v. Wade via the Dobbs

decision as a critical rollback of reproductive rights, with 14
U.S. states enforcing near-total bans, and vague exceptions
leaving providers legally vulnerable. Minority and low-income
women are disproportionately impacted due to the Hyde
Amendment, which restricts federal funding (NYT, Planned
Parenthood Action).
Germany’s stance: These legal uncertainties threaten women’s
bodily autonomy and the ethical practice of medicine. Germany
supports legislative clarity, codification of abortion rights, and
equitable healthcare coverage.

3. Telemedicine & Medication Abortion

Germany acknowledges the increasing role of telehealth and

medication abortion—particularly mifepristone, which accounts for
over 60% of U.S. abortions (Guttmacher). However, legal risks
and surveillance practices, especially in the U.S., Poland, and
Nigeria, hinder widespread adoption.

Germany’s stance: Telemedicine is a safe, cost-effective solution

backed by WHO and must be legally protected. Germany
promotes cross-border frameworks and legal shielding for both
patients and providers.

4. Unsafe Abortions and Health System Burdens

Globally, unsafe abortions contribute to 5–13% of maternal

deaths, costing health systems over $553 million annually to
treat complications (WHO, UN Women). Nations like Zambia and
Honduras deter providers from offering services due to fear of
criminal prosecution.

Germany’s stance: These deaths are preventable. Governments

must ensure legal access, provider protection, and post-abortion
care. Germany advocates for comprehensive provider training
and protection clauses.

5. Stigma, Surveillance, and Social Harm

Germany identifies social stigma, digital surveillance, and

misinformation as modern barriers. Countries like Poland and
some U.S. states use data from health apps or online searches
to prosecute women, infringing privacy rights (NYT, Amnesty).

Germany’s stance: Stigma must be dismantled through public

campaigns, anti-discrimination legislation, and privacy reforms.
Abortion must be treated as a medical service—not a moral crime.

6. Sexual Education & Prevention

Germany strongly supports Comprehensive Sexual Education

(CSE). As evidenced in Sweden and the Netherlands, where teen
pregnancies are among the lowest, proper education significantly
reduces unintended pregnancies and abortions (UNFPA, WHO).

Germany’s stance: Sex education must be science-based, age-

appropriate, and compulsory in school systems. Germany calls on
all nations to invest in preventive reproductive education.

7. Recent Progressive Reforms as Models

Germany applauds constitutional and legal reforms in:

  🇫🇷 France (2024): Enshrining abortion in the Constitution

 🇲🇽 Mexico (2023): Supreme Court decriminalization

 🇦🇷 Argentina (2020): Legalization and reduced maternal

mortality

These nations serve as models of progressive reform, balancing

public will, legal rights, and health standards.

8. Germany’s Domestic Policy Example

Germany currently allows abortion within 12 weeks post-

mandatory counseling under §218a. As of 2023, an expert
commission has recommended decriminalizing abortion entirely,
aligning it with general medical law—reflecting growing consensus
that abortion is a healthcare issue, not a criminal one (German
Bundestag, WHO).

Key Issues for Delegates to Raise (Germany-Aligned

Focus):

 Codifying abortion rights as fundamental healthcare access

 Expanding telehealth under safe, regulated, protected

conditions

 Decriminalizing abortion to reduce stigma, fear, and provider

shortages

 Eliminating spousal/third-party consent requirements

  Integrating comprehensive sex education and modern
contraception access

 Investing in anti-stigma public health campaigns

 Ensuring data privacy and legal protection in digital health

environments

 Pressuring states with total bans to align with UN human

rights standards

Germany’s Verified Financial Commitments – Based on Official

Sources

1. Germany’s Contribution to UNFPA Core Resources

 In 2022, Germany pledged €57 million as a flexible core

contribution to UNFPA’s global operations, ranking among
the top donors Reddit+15United Nations Population
Fund+15United Nations Population Fund+15.

 In 2024, its core funding amounted to €42.5 million, directed

toward UNFPA’s core programming United Nations
Population Fund+3United Nations Population Fund+3United
Nations Population Fund+3.

2. Support to UNFPA Maternal & Newborn Health Thematic

Fund

 Germany committed €12 million toward this Fund spanning

up to 2027, with €3.6 million disbursed in 2024 United
Nations Population Fund.
3. Bilateral Rights-Based Family Planning Initiative (BMZ /
FP2030)

 At the 2019 Nairobi Summit, Germany pledged €100 million

annually (2019–2023) to rights-based family planning and
reproductive health under BMZ United Nations Population
Fund+11Countdown 2030+11Family Planning 2030+11.

 This Initiative was extended through 2025, although no

funding target has been disclosed beyond 2023 Countdown
2030.

 Combined funding in 2022–2023 totalled approximately €200

million, with 25 % (~€50 million/year) focused specifically on
family planning activities Family Planning 2030+3Family
Planning 2030+3Family Planning 2030+3.

4. Total SRH/FP and SRHR Disbursements (Including Bilateral

& Multilateral Support)

 In 2022, Germany’s SRH/FP funding across bilateral and

multilateral channels reached €103 million, or about 0.3% of
its Official Development Assistance (ODA) Family Planning
2030+2Countdown 2030+2United Nations Population Fund+2.

 In 2023, SRH/FP support declined slightly to €98 million,

while its overall SRHR commitment (inclusive of broader
thematic funding) stood at €309 million (an 11% reduction) .

 Germany’s BMZ Initiative including multilateral components

counted around €133 million committed for 2023 Countdown
2030.
 Summary Table

Category / Instrument Year(s) Amount (€)

UNFPA Core Contribution 2022 €57 million

UNFPA Core Contribution 2024 €42.5 million

Until €12 million (incl. €3.6

Maternal & Newborn Health Fund
2027 M in 2024)

BMZ Rights-Based Family 2019–

€100 million annually
Planning Initiative 2023

BMZ Bilateral & Multilateral 2022–

~€200 million
Commitment 2023

SRH/FP Total Disbursement 2022 €103 million

SRH/FP Total Disbursement 2023 €98 million

Broader SRHR Commitment (incl.

2023 €309 million
thematic funding)

BMZ Initiative + Multilateral

2023 €133 million
Components (2023)

Key Delegate-Oriented Talking Points (Formal MUN-ready)

1. “In 2022, Germany allocated €57 million to UNFPA core

resources, solidifying its position as a top-three contributor
 globally, enabling flexible programming and sustained global
reach.” bmz.de+12United Nations Population Fund+12United
Nations Population Fund+12United Nations Population
Fund+1Countdown 2030+1Wikipedia+7Family Planning
2030+7Countdown 2030+7Family Planning 2030+4Countdown
2030+4Family Planning 2030+4

2. “In 2024, Germany’s core contribution was €42.5 million,

combined with €3.6 million specifically to UNFPA’s Maternal
& Newborn Health Fund; total commitment to the Fund
spans €12 million through 2027.”

3. “Under BMZ’s Initiative on Rights-based Family Planning,

Germany pledged €100 million per year (2019–2023),
extended through 2025, with roughly 25 % allocated directly
to family planning services annually.” Family Planning
2030+2Family Planning 2030+2Family Planning 2030+2

4. “Germany’s SRH/FP funding peaked at €103 million in

2022, modestly declining to €98 million in 2023, while the
broader SRHR portfolio totalled €309 million in 2023—
representing a sustained multi-sectoral commitment.”
Countdown 2030

5. “BMZ initiatives combined with multilateral mechanisms

contributed ~€133 million in 2023, demonstrating Germany’s
commitment to both direct government partnerships and
UN-led multilateral initiative.” Countdown 2030
Should you require MUN-formatted citations, footnoted
references, or speech-ready lines crafted for floor delivery, I can
provide refined versions next.

Sources

You said:

please give the entir elink after pointer

ChatGPT said:

Certainly, Shubh. Below is the fully formatted list of Germany’s

financial and programmatic contributions to sexual and
reproductive health and rights (SRHR), each with full, direct links
to the official or UN-recognized source — ideal for citation during
MUN sessions or EB briefings.

🇩🇪 Germany’s Verified SRHR Funding & Support – With Full

Links

1. UNFPA Core Contribution – €57 Million in 2022

“In 2022, the Federal Republic of Germany pledged €57 million

as a core, flexible contribution to UNFPA’s global SRHR
programming, solidifying its status as a top global donor.”
 Source:
https://www.unfpa.org/updates/world-health-summit-germany-
announces-eu57-million-flexible-contribution-unfpa

2. UNFPA Core Contribution – €42.5 Million in 2024

“In 2024, Germany contributed approximately €42.5 million to

UNFPA’s core resources, reaffirming its leadership in global
reproductive health diplomacy.”

Source:
https://www.unfpa.org/updates/germany-leading-way-supporting-
maternal-health-most-vulnerable-countries

3. Maternal & Newborn Health Thematic Fund – €12 Million

(2023–2027)

“Germany committed €12 million to UNFPA’s Maternal & Newborn

Health Thematic Fund, with €3.6 million disbursed in 2024 to
support maternal healthcare systems in low-resource countries.”

Source:
https://www.unfpa.org/updates/germany-leading-way-supporting-
maternal-health-most-vulnerable-countries

4. Humanitarian Support to UNFPA – €7 Million Over 3 Years

(2022–2024)
“Germany allocated €7 million to the UNFPA Humanitarian
Thematic Fund over three years to ensure reproductive healthcare
access during emergencies.”

Source:
https://www.unfpa.org/updates/germany-provides-7-million-for-life-
saving-humanitarian-support

5. Additional Humanitarian Support – US$2.2 Million in 2024

“Germany further committed US$2.2 million in 2024 to respond to

reproductive health emergencies in conflict zones, in addition to
its €7 million multi-year humanitarian commitment.”

Source:
https://www.unfpa.org/updates/germany-strengthens-partnership-
unfpa-respond-women-and-girls-most-neglected-humanitarian

6. BMZ Rights-Based Family Planning Initiative – €100

Million/Year (2019–2023)

“Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and

Development (BMZ) committed €100 million per annum for rights-
based family planning and maternal health programs, under its
2019–2023 initiative.”

Source:
https://www.countdown2030europe.org/germany
7. Extension of BMZ SRHR Funding Beyond 2023

“Though the initial €100 million/year initiative concluded in 2023,

Germany announced an extension of its rights-based reproductive
health support through 2025, though no fixed figure has been
released.”

Source:
https://www.fp2030.org/germany-bmz

8. SRH/FP Total Disbursement – €103 Million (2022)

“Germany’s total disbursement for sexual and reproductive health

and family planning (SRH/FP) in 2022 was €103 million, as per
Countdown2030Europe's validated donor tracking.”

Source:
https://www.countdown2030europe.org/germany

9. SRH/FP Disbursement – €98 Million (2023); Broader SRHR –

€309 Million

“In 2023, Germany’s SRH/FP expenditure decreased slightly to

€98 million, while its total commitment to broader SRHR
programming reached €309 million, including gender equality and
maternal care components.”

Source:
https://www.countdown2030europe.org/germany
10. Multilateral SRHR Funding Estimate – ~€133 Million (2023)

“Germany’s estimated multilateral and bilateral SRHR commitment

in 2023, through BMZ and global health instruments, totalled
approximately €133 million.”

Source:
https://www.countdown2030europe.org/germany

ormal Responses When the Answer Is Not Currently Available –

MUN Style

1. "The Delegation of [Country] appreciates the query and

will furnish a comprehensive response shortly via formal
note or chit, pending internal verification."

2. "We acknowledge the importance of the question posed

and respectfully request the committee’s indulgence as we
consult our national brief; a detailed clarification shall
follow in due course."

3. "The delegation is currently in the process of obtaining

the precise data requested and will communicate an
informed response via diplomatic note at the earliest
opportunity."

4. "In the interest of providing accurate information, the

delegation requests to revert via an official chit once
internal consultations are concluded."

5. "We humbly request the committee’s patience as the

delegation confirms relevant details; a formal response will
be submitted in writing momentarily."
USA speech
Honorable Chair, esteemed delegates,

The Federal Republic of Germany reaffirms its unwavering

commitment to a rules-based international order, grounded in
mutual respect, democratic principles, and international law.

While the United States remains a vital transatlantic partner,

Germany does not equate alliance with acquiescence. Our foreign
policy is guided not by convenience but by conviction—particularly
in matters concerning human rights, bodily autonomy, and gender
equality.

On the issue at hand, we urge the committee to distinguish

sovereignty from impunity. Germany maintains a principled stance:
where individual rights are under threat—be it in the Global North
or South—silence is not diplomacy, it is complicity.

We therefore call upon the United States to engage

constructively, in alignment with international frameworks, and
invite this committee to uphold both national integrity and
universal rights. Germany shall continue to collaborate, but never
compromise on its values.

I yield the floor

🇩🇪 Germany & UN Women – Financial & Strategic Commitments

1. €50 Million Cross-Country Humanitarian Support (2024–25)

“Germany committed an additional €50 million in humanitarian

assistance to UNHCR, UNICEF, and UN Women to strengthen
gender-responsive actions in Ethiopia and neighboring countries.”
Full link: https://ethiopia.un.org/en/289812-germany-commits-
additional-50-million-euro-cross-country-humanitarian-responses UN
Women+10The United Nations in Ethiopia+10Capital
Newspaper+10

2. 30 % Gender Quota in Corporate Supervisory Boards (since

2016)

“Since January 1, 2016, a legal mandate requires publicly listed

and co-determined companies to reserve a minimum of 30 % of
supervisory board seats for women.”
Full link: https://www.unwomen.org/en/get-involved/step-it-
up/commitments/germany Wikipedia+13UN Women+13Morgan
Philips Insights+13
Additional background: https://worker-participation.eu/About-
WP/What-s-new/30-female-quota-in-supervisory-boards-of-German-
DAX-companies Morgan Philips Insights+5Worker
Participation+5Financial Times+5

Delegate-Ready Overview Table

Initiative /
Timeline Commitment & Full Link
Instrument

€50M to UNHCR/UNICEF/UN
Cross-Countr
Late 2024 → 2025 Women ➜
y
https://ethiopia.un.org/en/28981
Initiative /
Timeline Commitment & Full Link
Instrument

Humanitarian 2-germany-commits-additional-
Support 50-million-euro-cross-country-
humanitarian-responses
TIME+15The United Nations in
Ethiopia+15allAfrica.com+15

30 % female quota in
Boardroom supervisory boards ➜
Gender Since 01 Jan 2016 https://www.unwomen.org/en/ge
Quota t-involved/step-it-
up/commitments/germany

Insight via case

study ➜
https://worker-
Further participation.eu/About
Enterprise -WP/What-s-new/30-
Data female-quota-in-
supervisory-boards-
of-German-DAX-
companies

🗣 Key Delegate Lines (with Embedded References)

1. “In late 2024, Germany allocated €50 million for cross-

country UN humanitarian responses—funding UN Women’s
 gender-sensitive operations in Ethiopia and the region.” [Full
link above] UN Women+10The United Nations in
Ethiopia+10YouTube+10

2. “Since 2016, Germany enforces a 30 % gender quota in

publicly listed and co-determined companies, aligning
domestic policy with UN Women’s Step It Up gender
equality commitments.

Commitment under ICCPR & UN Human Rights Committee

(HRC)

Germany regularly engages with the ICCPR framework, submitting

Concluding Observations and official responses. In 2005, it
submitted its responses to the ICCPR committee as Germany's
official state party report (CCPR/CO/80/DEU/Add.1).
Full link:
https://www.refworld.org/reference/statepartiesrep/hrc/2005/en/32796
Refworld+1Refworld+1

2. UN Human Rights Council Candidacy & Commitments

Germany applied for and secured a seat on the UN Human

Rights Council for 2023–2025, pledging feminist foreign policy,
diversity, climate justice, and support for ICC and climate-related
human rights jurisprudence.
Full link: https://ishr.ch/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Germany-
Pledge-1.pdf ISHR
3. Universal Periodic Review (UPR)

Germany underwent its fourth UPR in November 2023,

reaffirming its engagement with global human rights mechanisms.
Full link: https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-
releases/2023/11/germanys-human-rights-record-be-examined-
universal-periodic-review OHCHR

4. Support from OHCHR & International Advocacy

The Human Rights Committee lauded Germany’s refugee

solidarity and protections during its ICCPR review; Germany has
maintained a standing invitation to UN Special Procedures.
Full link: https://reliefweb.int/report/germany/dialogue-germany-
human-rights-committee-commends-solidarity-receiving-refugees-and
OHCHR+5ReliefWeb+5ISHR+5

5. UN Women & Gender Equality

Germany’s legal frameworks fully align with SDG 5 indicators.

According to UN Women (Feb 2024):

 100% legal frameworks in place promoting gender equality.

 Adolescent birth rate: 0.1 per 1,000 girls (2021).

 Women in parliament: 35.3%.

Full link: https://data.unwomen.org/country/germany
ReliefWeb+2UN Women Data Hub+2Auswärtiges Amt+2
Additionally, Germany collaborates on major platforms like the
“Beijing+30” review to advance gender equality.
Full link: https://www.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/2024-
09/b30_report_germany_en.pdf UN Women+1UN Women+1

6. Refugee Rights & Anti-Discrimination Efforts

Despite strong legal foundations, Human Rights Watch (2024)

flagged a rise in hate crimes against migrants, religious
minorities, Jews, Muslims, and LGBT groups.
Full link: https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-
chapters/germany Human Rights Watch+1Wikipedia+1

7. Pandemic Preparedness (WHO Collaboration)

In May 2021, Germany and the WHO launched a global

pandemic data hub in Berlin to enhance early alert systems.
Full link: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/germany-calls-
global-reset-fight-pandemics-2021-05-05/ Reuters

8. International Humanitarian Aid

Germany pledged €60 million in December 2024 to Syria for

education, women’s rights, with allocations including €3 million to
a UN women’s fund.
Full link: https://www.reuters.com/world/germany-plans-62-mln-
boost-syrian-schools-projects-2024-12-30/ Reuters+1ISHR+1
9. UN Women Campaign & Climate–Gender Programs

Germany collaborated with UN Women and partners on the “We

the Women” campaign for sustainable futures.
Full link: https://unpartnerships.un.org/women-rise-for-all
unpartnerships.un.org

10. ICC Backing & HRC Mechanisms

Germany supports ICC operations, HRC commissions (e.g.

Ukraine), and was instrumental in securing recognition of the right
to a healthy environment at the HRC in 2021.
Full link: https://ishr.ch/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Germany-
Pledge-1.pdf ISHR

11. Freedom of Expression Controversies

In Nov 2023, Germany was criticized by Muslim-majority countries

for restricting pro-Palestinian expression and not effectively
addressing Islamophobia.
Full link: https://www.reuters.com/world/germany-accused-
silencing-pro-palestinian-voices-un-rights-forum-2023-11-09/ Reuters