Urban Farming: A Case Study on Sustainable Agriculture in Metropolitan
Areas
Abstract
This case study examines the rapid adoption of urban farming in metropolitan areas,
focusing on its role in promoting sustainable agriculture, reducing food deserts, and
fostering community engagement. The research combines literature review, survey data,
and expert interviews to highlight key drivers, challenges, and long-term implications.
Keywords
Urban Farming, Sustainable Agriculture, Food Security, Community Development, Green
Economy
Literature Review
Urban farming has gained traction globally due to increased urbanization and food security
concerns. Studies by FAO (2019) and WHO (2021) suggest that urban agriculture can
enhance nutritional outcomes and reduce environmental impacts. Rooftop gardens,
hydroponics, and community allotments are cited as successful implementations in cities
like Singapore and Toronto.
Methodology
This study adopts a mixed-methods approach: a survey of 250 urban farmers across three
cities, semi-structured interviews with agricultural policy experts, and analysis of municipal
farming policies. Data was collected between March and July 2024.
Data & Analysis
Survey results show that 68% of respondents began urban farming for health and
sustainability reasons, while 54% cited rising food costs. Expert interviews revealed that
lack of policy support and funding remain significant barriers. Data analysis indicates
strong potential for scaling urban farming in densely populated areas.
Conclusion
Urban farming is a viable solution for enhancing urban food security and promoting
environmental sustainability. Policy reforms, funding initiatives, and public awareness
campaigns are essential to overcome existing barriers and scale up operations.
References
FAO. (2019). The State of Food and Agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
WHO. (2021). Urban Agriculture and Nutrition. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Smith, J., & Lee, R. (2023). Urban Farming Innovations. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture,
45(2), 112-128.