Transcription:

I'm here to talk to you about Indian education, higher education in particular. But I'm actually
going to start with demography. How many of you here are under 35? Okay, that seems pretty
representative of the country. 65% of India is under 35. How many of you are under 25? Okay,
then you're not so represented because actually we have half the Indian population pretty much
under 25. We are an amazingly young country. In fact, if you just take the age group from 10 to
19, there are 226 million Indians poised, in other words, to enter higher education, going
through school and ready for higher education. Now this is amazing because it's happening at a
time when the rest of the world is aging. If you look at the average age in India today, it's 28. Of
course, don't ask about the gaps since we heard about gaps between the average age of the
Indian person and of the Indian cabinet. I think we hold the world record for that. But that's
another matter. That's another TED Talk, right?

But what you've got with this average age is a time when the rest of the world is changing. So
by 2020, the average age in Japan is going to be 47. In China, it's going to be heading well past
40. Europe, 46. The United States, youthful US, also 40. And India's average age is going to be
29. So we are potentially the people who are the youthful, productive, dynamic, young
population ready to work and transform the world. The kinds of role that, say, China played in
the last generation could be ours in the next. In fact, the International Labour Organization has
worked out that by 2020, we'll have 116 million people in the age group of starting work, 20 to
24 is what they calculate. And China will only have 94 million at the same time. So we really are
poised to do that. And by the way, other countries will have a serious deficit. It's estimated that
the US will have 17 million short in terms of how many people they need in working age. We in
India have the people. But do we have the ability to equip the people to take advantage of this,
to be the workhorse or the work engine for the world?

See, we get it right. We educate and train them. We really transform not just our own economy
and our society, but the world. If we get it wrong, the demographic dividend I'm talking about
becomes a demographic disaster. Because we've already seen in 165 of our 625 districts what
happens when unemployed, frustrated, undereducated young men become prey to the
blandishments of the Maoists and prey to the gun and the bullet. So education in our country is
not just a social or economic issue. It's even a national security issue. We've got to equip our
people to take advantage of what the 21st century offers them.

Now this is the story in a nutshell. Four E's:

Expansion was our first priority in education. Why? Because the British, and I won't even ask if
any of you here, left us in 1947 with a 16% literacy rate. There were only 400,000, 4 lakh
students in the entire country in higher education. We had 26 universities, fewer than 700
colleges. So obviously expansion was essential. We've gone right from that 16% to 74% literacy
today. We've gone from 26 universities to 650 universities. We've gone from those 400,000
students, 4 lakh students to 20 million students in higher education today. And we have 35,000
colleges as well instead of the 700 colleges we had then. So expansion has taken place.

We've also had to fight for the second E of equity, that is including the excluded from education.
Trying to reach out to the unreached. The people who didn't get a fair shake in education for
reasons they couldn't help. Gender, an obvious reason. When we had that 16% literacy rate,
you know what the female literacy rate was? 8.9% at the time of independence. Just 1 out of 11
Indian women could read and write. Caste, region, religion, all sorts of people got left out of the
system. We had to bring them in. And that became a big challenge and a priority for education.

In getting those two things more or less right, I don't know how well we did on the third E, which
is the E of excellence. Obviously you need quality. And we set about setting up institutions of
great quality in our country. The IITs are a good example. In fact, it's part of Jawaharlal Nehru's
vision that the IIT in Kharagpur was established back in 1956, the year I was born. And it was
doneon the site of a British detention center, the Hijli detention center. So a symbol of political
oppression became instead a symbol of hope, of technology, of looking to the future. But for the
IITs, the IIMs, a few good institutions, I'm sure you can all pick your few around the country,
these have tended to be islands of excellence floating on a sea of mediocrity. The average
Indian higher education institution is simply not of the quality that you and I, all of us in this
audience, would like to see. And that ties into the fourth E that I've added to this catechism,
employability.

Talk to employers, talk to CEOs, what do they tell you? That they're simply not satisfied with the
quality of the graduates they're getting. Even in the T of TED, the technological area,
engineering graduates, half a million engineering graduates a year. But if you talk, for example,
to the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, they did a survey, 64% of
employers are not satisfied with the quality of graduates they're getting. Some companies are
running, essentially, re-education places. Infosys has a gigantic campus in Mysore. And it's not
on-the-job training, which big companies tend to do. It is, in fact, really a full year's education for
the people they've already hired to make up for the deficiencies of what they've learned and not
properly learned in college. Now that's the scale of the challenge that we face.

What are we doing about it? A great deal needs to be done. Of course, we are trying to put in
kids into the system at an early age. The RTE, the Right to Education Act. If kids were out of
school in the old days, it was their parents' fault. Today, if they're out of school, it's the state's
fault. The government is committed to actually getting them an education. We've got more and
more money being pumped in by the system at all levels. For example, many of you may have
gone to prestigious universities. Lots of people in India don't. They go to state universities,
which are grossly underfinanced. We've come up with a scheme to pump central money into the
state universities so they actually have resources to do something with the students they have
there.

Money isn't the whole answer. There is an entire challenge in terms of addressing things like the
gender gap. That's a gap that despite what the earlier speaker said, we don't want to embrace,
right? It's a gap we must, must overcome. Right now, women's literacy is 66%. Better than the
8.9, but still means that one out of every three Indian women still can't read and write. We have
to overcome that. We need to catch the ones who've been left out of the net. Adult literacy, huge
challenge.

I went off to a village in Tamil Nadu not far from Kanchipuram and I met women who in their 50s
and 60s were learning to read and write. And people think sometimes what's the point? Some of
their own family members, their husbands think what's the point? The answer is it changes their
lives. It empowers them in real ways. I spoke to a woman called Chitra Mani who told me,
proudly wrote her name in Tamil on a piece of paper. And I said, so what does being able to
read mean and read and write mean to you? And she said, now I can see the destination of the
bus where it's going. I don't have to ask somebody where that bus is going. I know where I can
go. When I get to the big city of Kanchipuram, I can read the street signs. I can find where I
need to go. I don't feel helpless anymore. That kind of, that empowerment is what literacy gives
people in a very fundamental and real way.

And we're trying to do that, of course, for those who've dropped out early on in the days before
we got to that 74%. The younger kids, we've got them into school now. We have something
called a gross enrollment ratio, the percentage of children of a certain age, of the age
appropriate for a particular level of education. Well, at primary school now, our gross enrollment
ratio is 116%. We've actually enrolled more kids than we thought existed at that age group
because some of the older ones are coming in too. Bad news is as you grow up the level, it
starts dropping. So by the eighth grade, I'm afraid it's down to 69%. By the 10th grade, 39%.
And by college, our gross enrollment ratio is about 18% against the global average of 29%. So
clearly we still need to do more. Our expansion hasn't gone enough. We haven't managed to get
everyone to stay in the system. Some of them actually need vocational training. They're not all
going to become white-collar clerks or officials or IAS officers, right? So we need to try and
catch them and get them into vocational training.

But how do you do that in a culture where for 3,000 years, if you wanted to be a cobbler or a
carpenter, you better have an uncle or a father who's a cobbler or a carpenter because nobody
else is going to teach you. The transmission of knowledge of tradecraft in our country has
always been through the gene pool. It's one of the reasons why the sons of politicians tend to be
politicians also. And of Bollywood movie stars, same story. So we need to get master craftsmen.
Why is itwith a country of 1.2 billion people that we should have a nationwide shortage of
masons, of plumbers, of certified electricians? We need to get more vocational training. Of
masons, of plumbers, of certified electricians. We need to get more vocational training into the
system. We're doing that, we're now rolling out the whole concept of community colleges so that
kids can go in, have some academic learning, lots of vocational training, and at the end of two
years, if they show tremendous academic promise, they can go back to a university. If not, they
leave with a two-year certificate and they go off and do a useful trade in a society that is
clamoring for these skills. So these are the kinds of changes that we are trying to bring about
and move along.

But there's a change that the government alone can't do. You know, if you look at the need for
research and innovation, you've heard a lot of that, I'm sure, in the course of the TED Talks.
Research is something which the government wants to double the amount of money it's
spending on research from 1% of GDP to 2%. We haven't had the money to pump into it yet.
But innovation requires new ways of thinking. I heard you had a talk about hyper-thinking, I
missed it. But new ways of thinking mean learning to think out of the box, learning to create.

I know we're famous for Jugaad, right? You Google the words frugal innovation and the top 20
hits will all relate to Indian inventions. We've invented the world's cheapest electrocardiogram,
the simplest and cheapest EKG, the cheapest insulin injection, the world's cheapest small car,
the Tata Nano, all that's come. But all these have been things invented elsewhere that we have
stripped down, made more affordable, more replicable, more relevant to our conditions. We
need to do things that others haven't done before, which we used to do in our culture. We're the
land that invented the zero. Remember how the Romans used to write their numerals in long
strings of letters? Until an Indian thought of the idea of zero emerging from the notion of
Shunyata in Hindu and Buddhist thinking. And that came into the zero, Shunya, which
transformed global mathematics. We need to think like that again. We need to come up with
ideas.

We have 17% of the world's brains. Why do we only have 2.8% of the world's research output
coming out of our country? Well, perhaps we need to start in the classroom. Get our kids not
just to have their heads filled full of facts and textbook materials and teachers' lectures. Because
frankly, that gives you a well-filled mind. But in the era of the internet, you don't need a well-filled
mind. You've got Google, right? You can find out anything you want with two clicks of the
mouse. What you need is a well-formed mind. A mind that reacts to unfamiliar facts and details.
That can actually synthesize information that it hasn't studied before. A mind, in other words,
that can react to the bigger examination called life. Which doesn't actually only give you things
you're prepared for. And for that you need a mind that's shaped by original thinking. A mind that
doesn't just ask the teacher why, but why not.

I've actually had a little experience of out-of-the-box thinking myself. I wear glasses. I don't need
them to read. I don't need them to see you folks on the front. But if I want to catch somebody in
the back row there, I have to look through glasses. But because I hardly ever wear them, I keep
losing or breaking them. I shove them in a pocket bag against a wall or something. They crack. I
put them on a lap. When I get up, they fall down. Somebody steps on them. They break. In the
first three months of this year, I lost or broke six pairs of glasses. So I was telling a friend about
this. And he said, simple solution. Baba, can't you think of that? I said, look, there is no easy
solution. Because for 150 years, glasses have been made in one way, right? They're joined
together at the center and they hang over your ears. That's what I find inconvenient, so I take
them off. And he said, no, no, no, no, no. We'll find a different way. You can reimagine glasses in
a way that they're not going to hang over your ears or be joined in the middle. And this is what
he did. I'm wearing them right now. And I want to see anybody at the back. I just pull that
together. There are two magnets in the middle that click together. And I can see you all at the
back. Now, it's a silly example, perhaps. But it's an example of how one can think out of the box.
Things, familiar objects can be thought of in ways they haven't been thought of before. And that
way, we can move forward in the world.

I have no doubt that the challenges are enormous. There is simply no question that here, in our
country, we have to become literate. But there is one piece of good news. 95% of our
12-year-olds across India can read and write. So the future looks good. And as far as the
workforce is concerned, if we can get all these other pieces in place, we can say to the rest of
the world, we're coming. Thank you very much. Thank you.