Cambridge IGCSE: First Language English 0500/12
Cambridge IGCSE: First Language English 0500/12
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report f or
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes f or the May/June 2025 series f or most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
• the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
• the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
• the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
• marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
• marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
• marks are not deducted for errors
• marks are not deducted for omissions
• answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however, the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Examiners use a system of annotations as a shorthand for communicating their marking decisions to
one another. Examiners are trained during the standardisation process on how and when to use
annotations. The purpose of annotations is to inform the standard isation and monitoring processes
and guide the supervising examiners when they are checking the work of examiners within their team.
The meaning of annotations and how they are used is specific to each component and is understood
by all examiners who mark the component.
We publish annotations in our mark schemes to help centres understand the annotations they may
see on copies of scripts. Note that there may not be a direct correlation between the number of
annotations on a script and the mark awarded. Similarly, the use of an annotation may not be an
indication of the quality of the response.
The annotations listed below were available to examiners marking this component in this series.
Annotations
partially ef f ective Y Y Y Y Y
development Y
explanation/ Y
meaning
overview or Y Y
organisation (ef f ective (overview)
organisation
/ overview)
repetition Y Y Y
viewed – including Y Y Y Y Y
blank and
additional pages
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 1
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R5 (25 marks):
and Question 1(f) only tests writing assessment objectives W2 and W3 (5 marks):
1(a) R5 1
1(b)(i) R1 and R2 2
1(b)(ii) R1 2
1(c) R2 2
1(d)(i) R1 and R5 2
1(e) R1 and R2 3
W2 and W3 5
Total 30
1(a) What were the first food trucks called, according to the text ? 1
• chuckwagons
1(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
1(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
• modern are exclusively food and drink outlets whereas chuckwagons sold
a wider range of products other than food and drink / carried medical
supplies
• cookie on chuckwagons offered services beyond the chef role
• food produce sold fresh today whereas chuckwaggons sold preserved
food
Identify two reasons why food trucks are becoming more popular with
customers.
• nostalgia
• street food more fashionable
• innovation / use of technology
• can find location easily via website
Explain why many business people prefer operating mobile food trucks
to running restaurants in permanent locations.
Answers which are entirely in the words of the text should not be credited.
1(f) According to Text B, how and why are old buses being used? 15
You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own
words as far as possible.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 1(f) (Table A, Reading and Table B
Writing).
Table A, Reading
0 0 • No creditable content.
Table B, Writing
3 4–5 • A relevant response that is expressed clearly, fluently and mostly with
concision.
• The response is well organised.
• The response is in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate), using a
range of well-chosen vocabulary which clarifies meaning.
2 3–2 • A relevant response that is generally expressed clearly, with some evidence
of concision.
• There may be some lapses in organisation.
• The response is mainly expressed in the candidate’s own words (where
appropriate) but there may be reliance on the words of the text.
0 0 • No creditable content.
Note 1: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and d erived from the texts.
Question 2
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R4 (25 marks):
2(a)(i) R1 1
2(a)(ii) R1 1
2(a)(iii) R2 1
2(a)(iv) R2 1
2(b)(i) R2 1
2(b)(ii) R1 1
2(b)(iii) R1 1
Total 25
2(a)(i) Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as 1
the words underlined:
Any interested person watching might notice that this large bus was
different from the buses they sometimes saw in their country.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
2(a)(ii) The bus company was still really helpful after the bus had been sold. 1
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
2(a)(iii) The disastrous end to their journey was when the bus ended up in a 1
river.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
2(a)(iv) The writer and their fellow travellers showed incredible immaturity to 1
think that they could make such a journey without mishap.
Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
correct answer.
2(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the 1
words underlined:
It’s difficult to envisage how cut off from our previous lives we were
back then. Mobile phones and emails weren’t yet invented. There was no
internet linking different countries and cultures. To phone home was
expensive and public phones weren’t easy to find. I was away two years
and managed to phone home twice.
2(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the 1
words underlined:
2(b)(iii) Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the 1
words underlined:
2(c) Use one example from the text below to explain how the writer suggests 3
the attitude of the owner of the orange juice.
This is the story of that big, red double-decker bus. This isn’t a
children’s story, and if you try reading it to children, they’ll soon lose
interest in the increasingly petty details of our daily life. In one early
letter to my parents, I wrote: ‘We had yet another meeting yesterday to
sort out grievances.’ This latest inquest had been into who’d drunk
someone’s orange juice from the fridge. The devastated owner knew
some had been ‘stolen’ because he’d marked the level of the liquid in
the bottle.
Explain how the writer uses language to convey meaning and to create
effect in these paragraphs. Choose three examples of words or phrases
from each paragraph to support your answer. Your choices should
include the use of imagery.
This question is marked for the ability to select powerful or unusual words and
for an understanding of ways in which the language is effective. Expect
responses to provide words / phrases that carry connotations additional to
general meaning.
Mark holistically for the overall quality of the response, not for the number of
words chosen, bearing in mind that for the higher bands there should be a
range of choices to demonstrate an understanding of how language works, and
that this should include the ability to explain images. It is the quality of the
analysis that attracts marks. Do not deduct marks for inaccurate statements;
simply ignore them.
The following notes are a guide to what good responses might say about the
selections.
Candidates can make any sensible comment, but only credit those that are
relevant to the correct meanings of the words in the context and that have some
validity. Alternative acceptable explanations should be credited. Credit
comments on effects created by non-vocabulary choices such as grammar /
syntax and punctuation devices. These must be additional to comments on
vocabulary.
2(d) Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to
choices.
Paragraph 5
Overview: the bus has been transformed into a functional but compressed
living space which draws attention due to being old and unusual.
• our world was inside (that double decker bus): everything / all their
possession are onboard; they are confined inside the limits of the bus
socially too
• an overloaded display case of rattling glass and metal on wheels :
the bus is noisy and crowded; on show wherever they go; packed in;
unsafe, incongruous
• People stared in; we gazed out: like exhibits in a shop or museum; two
way – intrusive interest from people outside, considered them odd; amazed
/vacant expression on the passengers’ faces
• completely gutted: everything taken out; all signs of previous life
removed
• (its normal entrance doors) sealed up: sense of being trapped;
claustrophobic; difficult to get out
• gained access squeezing through: getting inside wasn’t easy; no normal
doors left; tricky process to get inside; impractical
• magicking snug bunk beds: amazing creativity / power; extremely skilled
craftsperson ;(a little too) small, though cosy place to sleep
• ingenious storage seats: clever design to make the best use of space
• almost adequate kitchen area/table: not quite fit for purpose; a bit too
small, but best possible
• disappearing to reveal various emergency supplies, spares and
snacks nestled secretly beneath: extension of magical powers – seats
when lifted off have items they might need stored beneath; nature of
supplies and spares unclear though ‘snacks’ also there suggests these
too may not be that vital
• sliver of space (escaped): every single piece of space; no matter how
thin; has been utilised
2(d) Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to
choices.
Paragraph 6
2 4–6 • The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that
communicate less well.
• The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain why
they are used.
• Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
• They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific
words.
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and d erived from the texts.
Question 3
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R3 (15 marks):
3 You are Vic. Shortly after the whole trip ends, you write a letter to a 25
friend telling them about your experience.
• describe the preparations for the trip and how you came to be
involved
• outline the different challenges faced once the journey began and
how these were resolved
• explain what you think everyone learned through the experience and
looking back what you all should have done differently and why.
Base your letter on what you have read in Text C, but be careful to use
your own words. Address each of the three bullet points.
Use the Marking Criteria for Question 3 (Table A, Reading and Table B
Writing)
Candidates should select ideas from the text (see below) and develop them
relevantly, supporting what they write with details from the text. Look for an
appropriate register for the genre, and a clear and balanced response which
covers the three areas of the question, is well sequenced, and is in the
candidate’s own words.
Annotate A1 for references to the preparations for the trip and how you came
to be involved.
Annotate A2 for references to the different challenges faced once the journey
began and how these were resolved.
Annotate A3 for references to what you think everyone learned through the
experience and looking back what you all should have done differently and
why.
3 A1: describe the preparations for the journey and how you came to be
involved
A2: outline the different challenges faced once the journey began and
how they were resolved
• limited space (det. snug bunk beds, removable seats, kitchen area/table)
[dev. designed convertible objects / made the most of the space they did
have / lack of privacy]
• bus breaking down (det. mechanical crisis, bus company sent out spares)
[dev. ran out of spares/didn’t have the right spares with them / had to learn to
fit spares]
• manoeuvring the bus (det. taller than average double-decker, damaged
overhead bridges, cables and lines) [dev. learned to avoid bridges etc when
they could; / coped with different terrains (differently)]
• squabbles over supplies (det. ‘stolen’ orange juice) [dev. lots of argument]
• communication back home (det. expensive to phone home; wrote letters
home) [dev. could only phone home when they found a public phone box /
limited options for contact / felt distant from home]
• finance (det. growing expenses / planned adverts didn’t happen; got jobs
fruit picking) [dev. lack of money for fuel threatened to stop the journey;
everyone had to be prepared to do manual work]
A3: what you think everyone learned through the experience and looking
back what you should have done differently and why
5 13–15 • The response reveals a thorough evaluation and analysis of the text.
• Developed ideas are sustained and well related to the text.
• A wide range of ideas is applied.
• There is supporting detail throughout, which is well integrated into the
response, contributing to a strong sense of purpose and approach.
• All three bullets are well covered.
• A consistent and convincing voice is used.
4 10–12 • The response demonstrates a competent reading of the text with some
evidence of basic evaluation or analysis.
• A good range of ideas is evident.
• Some ideas are developed but the ability to sustain them may not be
consistent.
• There is frequent, helpful supporting detail, contributing to a clear sense of
purpose.
• All three bullets are covered.
• An appropriate voice is used.
1 1–3 • The response is either very general, with little reference to the text, or a
reproduction of sections of the original.
• Content is either insubstantial or unselective.
• There is little realisation of the need to modify material from the text.
3 5–6 • Language is clear but comparatively plain and/or factual, expressing little
opinion.
• Ideas are rarely extended, but explanations are adequate.
• Some sections are quite well sequenced but there may be flaws in structure.