Cambridge IGCSE ™: First Language English 0500/12
Cambridge IGCSE ™: First Language English 0500/12
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report f or
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes f or the February/March 2025 series f or most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level components, and some Cambridge O Level
components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level
descriptions for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these
marking principles.
 •    the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
 •    the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
 •    the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
 •    marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
      is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
      referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
 •    marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
 •    marks are not deducted for errors
 •    marks are not deducted for omissions
 •    answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
      features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
      meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
 Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
 instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
 Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
 (however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
 responses seen).
 Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
 not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Examiners use a system of annotations as a shorthand for communicating their marking decisions to
one another. Examiners are trained during the standardisation process on how and when to use
annotations. The purpose of annotations is to inform the standard isation and monitoring processes
and guide the supervising examiners when they are checking the work of examiners within their team.
The meaning of annotations and how they are used is specific to each component and is understood
by all examiners who mark the component.
We publish annotations in our mark schemes to help centres understand the annotations they may
see on copies of scripts. Note that there may not be a direct correlation between the number of
annotations on a script and the mark awarded. Similarly, the use of an annotation may not be an
indication of the quality of the response.
The annotations listed below were available to examiners marking this component in this series.
partially effective Y Y Y Y Y
development Y
                   explanation/                                                    Y
                   meaning
                   overview or                          Y (effective               Y
                   organisation                         organisation               (overvie
                                                        / overview                 w)
lifted material Y Y
repetition Y Y Y
                   summative                         Y                       Y         Y
                   comment                           Reading                 Reading   Reading
                                                     Writing                           Writing
                   viewed –                                                            Y
                   including blank
                   and additional
                   pages
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the texts.
Question 1
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R5 (25 marks):
and Question 1(f) only tests writing assessment objectives W2 and W3 (5 marks):
1(a) R5 1
1(b)(i) R1 2
1(b)(ii) R1 2
1(c) R1 2
1(d)(i) R1 and R5 2
1(e) R1 and R2 3
Total 30
    1(a)        Give two examples of animals which migrate (other than humpback                      1
                whales) according to paragraph 1.
                •    Monarch butterflies
                •    European swallows
1(b)(i) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
1(b)(ii) Using your own words, explain what the text means by: 2
                Give two ways in which migration differs from other types of animal
                movement.
                Identify two things scientists had to do before they were able to study
                how far the plains zebras travelled during migration.
                •    sedate them
                •    tag them / fit satellite trackers (to zebras)
                Explain what researchers in the second study did to test what might
                influence the direction in which migrating zebras travelled.
                Using your own words, explain why some people might not accept the
                findings of the study as conclusive.
Answers which are entirely in the words of the text should not be credited.
     1(f)       According to Text B, what are the reasons why changes to animal                   15
                migrations have occurred and why are these changes worrying?
                You must use continuous writing (not note form) and use your own
                words as far as possible.
                Use the Marking Criteria for Question 1(f) (Table A, Reading and Table B
                Writing).INDICATIVE READING CONTENT
                1  food in landfills distracts them / junk food offers easier feeding option
                2  global warming
                3  migration guards against parasites
                4  urbanisation / expansion of cities / increased infrastructure
                5  habitat divided / manmade barriers
                6  efforts to solve the problem aren’t working / attempts to re-establish
                   routes have failed / does not appear to be reversible
                7 affects ecosystem (in destination/Africa)
                8 increased competition for resources for resident non-migratory
                   species
                9 (lose) research generated by migration / will learn less about human
                   behaviour
                10 species in decline
                11 deforestation / destruction of stopover sites
0 0 • No creditable content.
Table B, Writing
    3         4–5       •    A relevant response that is expressed clearly, fluently and mostly with
                             concision.
                        •    The response is well organised.
                        •    The response is in the candidate’s own words (where appropriate), using a
                             range of well-chosen vocabulary which clarifies meaning.
    2         3–2       •    A relevant response that is generally expressed clearly, with some evidence
                             of concision.
                        •    There may be some lapses in organisation.
                        •    The response is mainly expressed in the candidate’s own words (where
                             appropriate) but there may be reliance on the words of the text.
0 0 • No creditable content.
Note 1: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the te xts.
Question 2
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R4 (25 marks):
2(a)(i) R1 1
2(a)(ii) R2 1
2(a)(iii) R1 1
2(a)(iv) R1 1
2(b)(i) R1 1
2(b)(ii) R2 1
2(b)(iii) R2 1
Total 25
   2(a)(i)      Identify a word or phrase from the text which suggests the same idea as                   1
                the words underlined:
                Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
                correct answer.
   2(a)(ii)     Seeing the flashing signals on the computer screen stops Lotta                            1
                worrying that the trackers will not work.
                Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
                correct answer.
  2(a)(iii)     Even though there are still a few bird species left alive, there is no                    1
                longer any money available to pay for scientists to study them.
                Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
                correct answer.
  2(a)(iv)      Lotta explains how the migrating birds begin by taking different routes                   1
                before they rejoin each other to find where the fish are.
                Accept cloze responses that repeat all / some of the question stem with the
                correct answer.
   2(b)(i)      Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the                        1
                words underlined:
   2(b)(ii)     Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the                        1
                words underlined:
                •    pinpoint : highlight / show the exact place / locate / indicate the position /
                     target the place they end up
  2(b)(iii)     Using your own words, explain what the writer means by each of the                         1
                words underlined:
                •    witness: observe / take note of / see (the evidence) / watch / look (at) /
                     view / personally experience
    2(c)        Use one example from the text below to explain how the writer suggests                     3
                Lotta’s attitude to the project.
                I’m not sure when dreaming of this last desperate project began, but it’s
                part of me now as much as the instinct for breath. It swallowed me
                whole – a fantasy quest, securing a place on a fishing vessel and having
                its captain carry me far south following the longest natural migration of
                any living creature.
                Explain how the writer uses language to convey meaning and to create
                effect in these paragraphs.
                The following notes are a guide to what good responses might say about the
                selections.
                Candidates can make any sensible comment, but only credit those that are
                relevant to the correct meanings of the words in the context and that have some
                validity. Alternative acceptable explanations should be credited. Credit
                comments on effects created by non-vocabulary choices such as grammar /
                syntax and punctuation devices. These must be additional to comments on
                vocabulary.
                Overview: Contrast between Lotta's skilled, careful actions and the fear of the
                bird wanting to escape.
                • (Her wing) clips the hair-thin wire (closing the basket gently): delicate
                     movement; tiny nudge of the sensitive trip-wire triggers the trap; the action
                     of the lid shutting is not sudden but careful, to avoid harming the bird;
                     equipment is non-threatening (materials used are natural/traditional)
                • (I) approach, not breathing, reluctant to scare her: wary, moving
                     forwards; does not want to frighten bird; punctuation mirrors the hesitant
                     movement towards the bird; sense of anticipation
                • (She) ruffles feathers: small shaking movement of plumage; puffing up
                     as if annoyed
                • (a) small burst of defiance: effort to resist, show of anger or protest; a
                     weak refusal to cooperate, though has no choice, tiny and ineffective
                • deftly looping: carefully, gently and skilfully wrapping (the band) around
                • (The) plastic tightens firmly, securing: artificial material, grips the bird’s
                     leg; won’t fall off/can’t easily be removed; possible overtones of effect of
                     humans/ pollution
                • (her) heartbeat pounds fast and fragile (inside my palm): stress is
                     affecting the bird’s heart rate; speeding it up, sounds delicate as if it might
                     break, emphasises the need for extreme care; bird feels
                     captured/imprisoned
                • (I) place her back in her nest, edging away: carefully positioning the bird
                     where she should be in her place of relative safety, moving away slowly bit
                     by bit; gentle actions designed to minimise impact, cautious; apologetic;
                     nervousness is incongruous as bird is far smaller than the human
                • (She) explodes free, swooping at me suddenly: quick brief movement,
                     flying suddenly out/upwards and then down at Lotta as if retaliating
                • (a) shrill cry: high pitched noise; piercing shriek; anguish, pain, surprise;
                     outraged at treatment
                Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to
                choices.
                Only credit comments on stylistic effect where these are explicitly linked to
                choices.
    2         4–6       •    The response provides a mixture of appropriate choices and words that
                             communicate less well.
                        •    The response may correctly identify linguistic devices but not explain why
                             they are used.
                        •    Explanations may be few, general, slight or only partially effective.
                        •    They may repeat the language of the original or do not refer to specific
                             words.
Note: All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in
candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills
demonstrated. Nonetheless, the content must be clearly related to and derived from the te xts.
Question 3
This question tests reading assessment objectives R1, R2 and R3 (15 marks):
      3         You are a journalist. You have interviewed Ennis and Lotta months after               25
                they have returned from their trip. You write a magazine article about
                Lotta’s research project and the conservation work they are both now
                involved in.
                Base your article on what you have read in Text C but be careful to use
                your own words. Address each of the three bullets.
                Use the Marking Criteria for Question 3 (Table A, Reading and Table B
                Writing)
                Candidates should select ideas from the text (see below) and develop them
                relevantly, supporting what they write with details from the text. Look for an
                appropriate register for the genre, and a clear and balanced response which
                covers the three areas of the question, is well sequenced, and is in the
                candidate’s own words.
                Annotate A1 for references to what Lotta did to prepare for the research project
                and the challenges she faced.
                Annotate A2 for references to why Lotta needed Ennis’s help with the project
                and why he decided to help her.
                Annotate A3 for references to how Ennis and Lotta felt about what happened
                on their journey and the changes they hope to bring about in the future .
      3         A1: what Lotta did to prepare for the research project and the challenges Lotta
                faced
                • Catch the birds (det. basket trap; only found/caught three) [dev. can be
                    aggressive / nervous creatures]
                • Putting trackers on the birds (det. lightweight, need to be quick, plastic
                    fastener) [dev. difficult / skilful / practice / not affect(ing) the birds]
                • Planning / previous study (det. mapped routes the birds have taken,
                    software, laptop, scientist, notes) [dev. identified patterns in birds’
                    behaviour]
                • Camping at the cliff (det. tent blown away, outside in the wild for days)
                    [dev. cold / uncomfortable]
                • Rental car (det. cheap, remote area) [dev. no public transport / needs to
                    carry equipment / too far to walk]
                • Money (det. no longer funding for research) [dev. has had to finance this
                    trip herself / does not know how long she can go on for]
                A2: why Lotta needed Ennis’s help with the project and why Ennis decided to help
                Lotta
                • Find fish (det. birds will show where the fish are) [dev. misses his way of
                    life / misses the fish(ing) / wants to know if fish still exist / Lotta offers him
                    hope]
                • No cameras (det. trackers only pinpoint where the birds are) [dev. need to
                    be able to see what the birds are doing]
                • Transport / boat (det.(captain of) Raven, birds fly south for the winter) [dev.
                    fulfilling a dream / needs to follow across water / experienced navigator]
                • Interested in birds (det. want to know how they survive, last colony) [dev.
                    impressed by the birds’ endurance / affinity with movement across the
                    ocean]
                • Lotta’s tenacity (det. finds him in the café, spent the night on the harbour,
                    followed him back to the boat) [dev. recognises Lotta’s passion for the
                    project / convinced by Lotta / resurrects his own passions]
                A3: how Ennis and Lotta felt about what happened on their journey and the
                changes they hope to bring about in the future
                • Storm (det. signals stopped) [dev. scary / thought the birds had died]
                • Initial disappointment on arrival at the ice-face (det. no sign of life after
                    months of travel) [dev. devastating / lowest point / lost all hope]
                • Have to walk (det. can get no further by boat) [dev. don’t want to give up
                    / still hoping for something / boat damaged by the journey]
                • Found terns (det. sees one, then hundred; colony) [dev. feeding on fish /
                    thriving]
                • Whale (det. huge, laughter as fin appears) [dev. thought there were no
                    more / believed to be extinct / other species may not be extinct after all]
                • Large bay (det. clean, untouched waters, unspoiled ice) [dev. thrilled /
                    hugely significant discovery / seemed unreal / hope for the future / may
                    be other discoveries ]
                • Commitment to protecting what is left / repopulating areas ( det. learn
                    from their experience) [dev. education / need to listen to scientists and act
                    / continue research / more responsible fishing or hunting / inspire others
                    to help]
Table A, Reading
    5       13–15       •    The response reveals a thorough evaluation and analysis of the text.
                        •    Developed ideas are sustained and well related to the text.
                        •    A wide range of ideas is applied.
                        •    There is supporting detail throughout, which is well integrated into the
                             response, contributing to a strong sense of purpose and approach.
                        •    All three bullets are well covered.
                        •    A consistent and convincing voice is used.
    4       10–12       •    The response demonstrates a competent reading of the text with some
                             evidence of basic evaluation or analysis.
                        •    A good range of ideas is evident.
                        •    Some ideas are developed but the ability to sustain them may not be
                             consistent.
                        •    There is frequent, helpful supporting detail, contributing to a clear sense of
                             purpose.
                        •    All three bullets are covered.
                        •    An appropriate voice is used.
    1         1–3       •    The response is either very general, with little reference to the text, or a
                             reproduction of sections of the original.
                        •    Content is either insubstantial or unselective.
                        •    There is little realisation of the need to modify material from the text.
    3         5–6       •    Language is clear but comparatively plain and/or factual, expressing little
                             opinion.
                        •    Ideas are rarely extended, but explanations are adequate.
                        •    Some sections are quite well sequenced but there may be flaws in structure.